WSJ : Investors See Interest-Rate Cuts Coming Soon, Recession or Not

Investors See Interest-Rate Cuts Coming Soon, Recession or Not
Recent data has fueled bets that cuts could come under a variety of circumstances

Wall Street is gearing up for rate cuts.

Twenty months after the Federal Reserve began a historic campaign against inflation, investors now believe there is a much greater chance that the central bank will cut rates in just four months than raise them again in the foreseeable future.

Interest-rate futures indicated last week a roughly 60% chance the Fed will lower rates by a quarter-of-a-percentage point by its May 2024 policy meeting, up from 29% at the end of October, according to CME Group data. The same data has pointed to four cuts by the end of the year.

Investors, battered by the Fed’s efforts to slow the economy, have reacted by driving the S&P 500 up nearly 9% this month. That is despite the wagers reflecting different possible paths for the economy, not all of them favorable for stocks.

One place where rate-cut bets are showing up is in the bond market, where yields on longer-term bonds have retreated further below those on short-term ones. Treasury yields largely reflect expectations for what short-term rates set by the Fed will average over the life of a bond. As a result, such a move is typically viewed as a warning of a looming recession, with investors betting the Fed will need to slash rates to stimulate growth.

This month’s rally in stocks signals many investors anticipate a more benign outcome. Their hope: inflation falls back to the Fed’s 2% target, growth remains steady, but the Fed cuts rates a modest amount anyway as insurance against an unnecessary slowdown.

Still, there is evidence that traders are betting on both economic scenarios. Investors celebrated this month’s round of inflation reports, which showed a broad deceleration in price increases. But there has also been a string of more worrisome data, including weaker-than-expected surveys of purchasing managers and an uptick in the unemployment rate.

“You’re really talking about a distribution of outcomes that range between the Fed doing nothing next year to the Fed cutting aggressively next year,” said Rob Waldner, fixed income chief strategist at Invesco.

Waldner is among those who believe the threat of a recession has increased. But he said his base case is still that the Fed delivers insurance cuts without a downturn.

Investors caution that it is still possible that the Fed doesn’t cut rates in 2024, potentially pushing bond yields higher again. The U.S. economy over the past couple of years has proved resilient, and the Fed has repeatedly raised rates higher than investors were expecting.

Even if inflation continues to moderate, the Fed is less likely to cut the better the economy performs, said Thanos Bardas, global co-head of investment-grade fixed income at Neuberger Berman. There are signs that consumers and businesses “have adapted to the higher-interest-rate regime,” he said.

The stock market’s recent surge marks a shift from the previous three months, when longer-term yields shot higher, bets on rate cuts were scaled back and stocks generally slumped, while data showed a jump in economic growth.

Investors say there are reasons why stocks can thrive when growth is slowing and even when the chances of a moderate downturn are rising.

All else equal, lower long-term Treasury yields can boost stocks by reducing the incentive for investors to shift their money into bonds. Investors had also feared that a 10-year Treasury yield approaching 5% could trigger a recession by pushing up borrowing costs for businesses and consumers, even if those fears weren’t showing up in bond yields themselves.

Adding to those concerns, many worried that yields were being driven higher by a surge in new Treasurys needed to fund a growing federal budget deficit, not just by a strong economy and bets on higher-for-longer rates.

This month’s bond rally, which has pulled the 10-year yield below 4.5%, got its start on Nov. 1 when the Treasury Department boosted auction sizes of longer-term bond sales by less than most investors were expecting. That bolstered the case that yields had climbed more than was justified by economic fundamentals, making their decline especially welcome.

Fed officials have consistently said that they aren’t close to discussing rate cuts.

But they have also signaled that they expect to lower rates, even absent a recession, once they are confident that inflation will reach their objective. In their last forecast in September, the median official expected rates to end next year a half of a percentage point lower than at the start of the year, or a quarter of a percentage point below where they are now.

“The time will come at some point, and I’m not saying when, that it’s appropriate to cut,” Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in September.

Investors’ new positioning on rates reflects other factors than their baseline forecasts. Many think that the Fed will likely cut rates by less than 1 percentage point next year. But they still are making that wager because they see a reasonable chance of even larger cuts.

In past recessions, the Fed has typically cut rates by about 3 to 4 percentage points over a year, said Sonu Varghese, global macro strategist at Carson Group, a financial advisory firm. As a result, bets on the Fed cutting rates by 1 percentage point could be interpreted as investors believing that there is a 25% to 33% chance of a recession in 2024.

However, taking into account bets on more modest insurance cuts, the perceived chance of a recession should be seen as lower, perhaps around 20%, Varghese said.

WSJ : China Scrambles to Contain a Looming Shadow-Bank Meltdown

China Scrambles to Contain a Looming Shadow-Bank Meltdown
Investors have protested against Zhongzhi, which has missed payments on some of its products

Chinese authorities are taking more forceful action to contain the growing financial troubles of one of the country’s biggest shadow lenders.

Police in Beijing said over the weekend that they had taken “criminal coercive measures”—a euphemism for arrests—against multiple employees of Zhongzhi Enterprise. The privately held conglomerate operates several businesses that sold investment products to many wealthy individuals and companies in China, and has struggled for months to make promised payments to investors.

The police probe is an escalation of China’s response to the problems at Zhongzhi, which last week said it was insolvent and had at least $31 billion more liabilities than assets. Zhongzhi said it had been highly dependent on the decision-making of Xie Zhikun, its founder and largest shareholder, who died in December 2021.

Over the summer, Zhongrong International Trust, which is part of the group, defaulted on many of its high-yielding investment products and fueled fears of financial contagion from China’s worsening property downturn. In September, two large state-owned financial institutions stepped in to provide assistance to Zhongrong, which had around $108 billion of assets under management at the end of 2022.

Zhongzhi is on the brink of becoming one of China’s biggest corporate failures in years. The firm’s collapse could deal a major blow to investor confidence at a time when China’s economy is still struggling to return to health and its stock market is languishing.

Investors who bought Zhongzhi products have gathered in social-media groups and in person over the past few weeks and tried to figure out ways to pressure the conglomerate to repay them, according to people familiar with the matter.

At one recent protest, dozens of people hung banners and shouted slogans such as “Zhongzhi, return us our money!” and “contract fraud!,” according to a video seen by The Wall Street Journal.

In a social-media post on Saturday, a branch of the Beijing police department asked investors to come forward to report their losses. But some investors said they were reluctant to do so since they might get implicated in the process, and felt they weren’t likely to get most of their money back.

Zhongzhi last week said it has liabilities of $59 billion to $64 billion, and assets of $28 billion. The total amount it owes could be far larger because the company didn’t include off-balance sheet liabilities in its calculation, said Zerlina Zeng, a senior analyst at CreditSights, a research firm.

“The recovery rate for investors will be very, very low,” said Zeng.

Chinese businesses have lost money, too. Since August, at least 17 publicly listed companies in mainland China have said in stock-exchange filings that they didn’t receive interest or principal payments on products managed by Zhongrong. Those missed payments add up to the equivalent of $153 million.

In September, police in Shenzhen took similar actions against the wealth-management unit of China Evergrande. The property developer and its subsidiaries had raised around $13 billion by selling investment products to domestic investors. After Evergrande slid into financial distress in 2021, it struggled to make payments on them.

Zhongzhi caters mainly to wealthy investors, typically requiring its clients to invest the equivalent of at least $420,000 in its products, according to marketing documents for several funds seen by the Journal. The firm offered annual returns of around 7% to 8% last year, the documents show. There were few limits on what these funds could invest in.

China’s sprawling trust industry, which had more than $3 trillion in assets under management at the end of June, has long been a source of financial support for property developers.

The property slump could pressure more trust companies, said Xiaoxi Zhang, an analyst at Gavekal Research. However, as the trust sector is still relatively small compared with China’s financial system, any broader spillover is likely to be limited, she said.

FT : How much FDI is China actually attracting?

How much FDI is China actually attracting?
Less. A lot less

Pretty much everyone agrees that foreign direct investment has collapsed in China. But pretty much no one seems to agree on exactly how far it’s collapsed — including inside China.

Some of this is simply due to the fact that economic data is tricky to collect and subject to frequent revisions, especially knotty stats like FDI in large countries like China. Moreover, China has a . . . unique approach to economic statistics, which means people often try to reverse-engineer more accurate data from other series.

But no amount of lipstick could make the provisional third-quarter FDI data look better. The preliminary balance of payments data from China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange released earlier this month indicated that inward FDI fell into negative territory for the first time since the series began in 1998.


Yet another set of official data seems to differ, in scale if not directionally.

SAFE indicates that cumulative FDI was just $15bn in the first nine months of the year — an almost 92 per cent slump since 2022’s total. However, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce puts it at a more moderate 33 per cent decline to $128bn in the first three quarters.


The second chart is from an interesting new paper by Nicholas Lardy, a senior fellow and resident China wonk at the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Most of the discrepancy is actually pretty easy to explain. SAFE measures FDI on a net basis, while the Ministry of Commerce measures it gross. However, there are also other methodological issues that can complicate things.

SAFE’s net measure has usually been much higher than the ministry’s gross one because it includes things like Chinese offshore IPOs, minority private equity and venture capital investments and reinvested profits of foreign firms as FDI.

That the SAFE measure fell below the ministry’s data in 2022 indicates that foreigner investors began yanking money out then, presumably after the west’s economic response to Russia invading Ukraine and rising tensions around Taiwan.

And the $113bn gap between the two measures in 2023 indicates that they’re now ditching Chinese investments and pulling money out at a remarkably rapid pace. Here’s Lardy:

Foreign firms operating in China are not only declining to reinvest their earnings but — for the first time ever — they are large net sellers of their existing investments to Chinese companies and repatriating the funds . . . These outflows exceeded $100 billion in the first three quarters of 2023 and are likely to grow further based on trends to date.

If we extrapolate the net FDI number calculated by SAFE to an annualised $20bn in 2023 (as Lardy notes, that might actually be optimistic given the collapse we’re seeing) that means China is on track to attract less FDI than Poland did in 2022, and less than half of what Sweden did, according to Unctad.

This goes a long way towards explaining why Xi Jinping went on an American charm offensive earlier this month.

He even gladhandled US business executives in San Francisco, stressing that China is “both a super-large economy and a super-large market” and “a partner and friend of the US”. (This might be an easier sell if he wasn’t also forcing foreign business executives in China to attend lectures on “Xi Jinping Thought”.)

Lardy’s certainly sceptical . . . 


Time will tell whether President Xi’s words will first stem the current large foreign direct investment (FDI) outflows and eventually lead to a resumption of the net FDI inflows that China has enjoyed for more than four decades. A safe assumption is that it will take more than words to accomplish this objective.

FT : Schaeffler raises Vitesco offer as it pushes into electric vehicles

Schaeffler raises Vitesco offer as it pushes into electric vehicles
Billionaire Schaeffler family is trying to acquire the rest of the German group

Germany’s billionaire Schaeffler family has increased its offer for Vitesco Technologies as the heirs to the car parts supplier step up efforts to expand their presence in electric vehicles.

Schaeffler, which is controlled by Georg Schaeffler and his mother Maria-Elisabeth Schaeffler, on Monday said it had lifted its offer for Vitesco to €94 a share from the €91 it bid last month.

The Schaefflers already own 49.9 per cent of Vitesco as well as 46 per cent of German tyremaker Continental.

In a joint statement on Monday, Schaeffler and Vitesco said they had reached agreement over the terms of a deal that would see the businesses combined.

The decision to raise the offer to Vitesco’s remaining shareholders was “made after careful consideration of the prevailing market sentiment, and underscores Schaeffler’s confidence in the significant synergies and the value creation potential” of the deal, the statement said.

The family, which has made its money from Germany’s role as a world-leading carmaker, is uniquely exposed to the industry’s historic switch to EVs — a field in which China has quickly gained dominance.

FT : Julius Baer to review private debt business

Julius Baer to review private debt business
Swiss wealth manager’s decision comes amid financial crisis at Austrian property group Signa

Julius Baer chief executive Philipp Rickenbacher said Switzerland’s second-biggest wealth manager would review its private debt business in the wake of the crisis engulfing Austrian property group Signa.

According to people familiar with the matter, Julius Baer is one of the biggest lenders to Signa, a European luxury developer whose assets include a stake in KaDeWe, Germany’s most famous department store, and the Chrysler Building in New York.

Shares in Julius Baer have dropped 16 per cent since it revealed last week that it was taking a SFr70mn ($80mn) provision against losses in its credit portfolio.

Shares dropped another 2 per cent when the market opened on Monday after the Swiss lender said the provision stemmed from its single largest exposure in its private debt loan book, which amounted to SFr606mn. The shares later reversed some of the fall in morning trading to be down 0.3 per cent.

“We regret that a single exposure has led to the recent uncertainty for our stakeholders,” Rickenbacher said. As a result, “we will review our private debt business and the framework in which it is conducted”.

Founded by René Benko, Signa has amassed a €27bn property portfolio but has been hit hard by rising interest rates. This month, Signa said it had appointed a new chair to restructure the group and Benko would be stepping back from the company.

Signa owes approximately €13bn to banks and investors, according to an analysis by JPMorgan. However, the group’s complicated structure and opacity mean it has been hard for lenders to assess how much risk there is to their capital.

The Financial Times has previously reported on a €364mn loan Julius Baer had extended to the Selfridges Group, the company behind the upmarket London department store, which is part-owned by Signa.

Julius Baer, which did not explicitly state the counterparty was Signa due to client confidentiality requirements, said its SFr606mn exposure consisted of three loans to different entities within a “European conglomerate” related to “commercial real estate and luxury property”, which was now subject to restructuring.

The lender said its total private debt loan book amounted to SFr1.5bn, including 21 other counterparties.

Julius Baer said it would book further provisions if required, though it added that even under a “hypothetical loss scenario”, its common equity tier one capital ratio — a measure of its financial strength — would drop from 16.1 per cent to 14 per cent, well above its regulatory requirement of 8.2 per cent.

Vontobel analyst Andreas Venditti said while the bank’s capital position was strong, there were still questions about its Signa exposure.

“The key question remains highly uncertain,” he said. “What collateral does Julius Baer hold and how much is it still worth?”

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 27th of Novembre 2023 V2(+)

>>> Up
* Aperam Raised to Neutral at Oddo BHF; PT 32 euros (+)
* Elior Group Raised to Buy at Deutsche Bank (+)
* Genmab Raised to Buy at NYKREDIT; PT 2,600 kroner
* Grenergy Renovables PT Raised to 60 euros from 50 euros at RBC
* Micron PT Raised to $71.50 from $58.50 at Morgan Stanley
* Outokumpu Raised to Outperform at Oddo BHF; PT 5.50 euros (+)
* Rightmove Raised to Buy at Peel Hunt
* Rightmove Raised to Buy at Numis; PT 675 pence (+)
* Roku Raised to Buy at Cannonball Research; PT $116 (+)
* Sandnes Sparebank Raised to Buy at Pareto Securities
* SEB Raised to Buy at AlphaValue/Baader
* SpareBank 1 SMN Raised to Buy at Pareto Securities
* Sparebanken Vest Raised to Buy at Pareto Securities
* YPF ADRs Raised to Neutral at Goldman; PT $17.10

>>> Down
* Afya Cut to Neutral at JPMorgan; PT $23
* Baltic Classifieds Group Cut to Add at Peel Hunt
* BASF Cut to Underweight at Morgan Stanley; PT 39 euros
* CNH Industrial PT Cut to $15 from $20 at UBS
* Deutsche Konsum REIT-AG Cut to Underperform at Oddo BHF
* Entain Cut to Sell at Goldman; PT 820 pence
* EQT Cut to Hold at Nordea
* Eutelsat Cut to Neutral at Goldman; PT 4 euros
* HelloFresh Cut to Add at AlphaValue/Baader
* Moneysupermarket Cut to Add at Peel Hunt; PT 305 pence
* Novartis Cut to Sell at Redburn; PT 80 Swiss francs (+)
* Okta Cut to Market Perform at JMP
* Santander Bank Polska Cut to Sell at Goldman; PT 410 zloty
* Sunndal Sparebank Cut to Hold at Norne Securities; PT 121 kroner (+)

>>> Initiation
* Bank of Cyprus Rated New Overweight at Euroxx Securities (+)
* Beerenberg Rated New Buy at SpareBank; PT 25 kroner
* BioArctic Rated New Buy at Kempen & Co; PT 350 kronor
* Compass Group Reinstated Hold at Numis; PT 1,900 pence
* H&M Reinstated Buy at Pareto Securities; PT 205 kronor (+)
* Hexagon Rated New Reduce at Inderes; PT 102 kronor
* Inficon Rated New Hold at Octavian; PT 1,130 Swiss francs (+)
* InterContinental Hotels Reinstated Hold at Numis; PT 5,600 pence
* Vivoryon Therapeutics NV Rated New Buy at Kempen & Co

>>> Call
* BASF Downgraded at Morgan Stanley on Cost Curve Challenges
* Corteva Cut to Hold at Berenberg as Crop Protection Growth Slows
* Deutsche Bank Says Equity Positioning Rises to Modest Overweight (+)

Miss Tweed : The Estée Series: 3-Why it makes sense for LVMH to buy the company



From: Laurent Chekroun (MAKOR CAPITAL MARKET) At: 11/26/23 14:08:19 UTC+1:00
Subject: Miss Tweed : The Estée Series: 3-Why it makes sense for LVMH to buy the company
The Estée Series: 3-Why it makes sense for LVMH to buy the company

The Estée Lauder Companies has come under the spotlight. Its share price has collapsed since January after a series of profit warnings, but it’s been rising steadily in the past three weeks. It is up 18 percent since Nov. 1. LVMH has denied any interest in acquiring the company, but investors are speculating that it could buy a stake or eventually make a bid. Some insiders also think an activist investor could build a position in order to put pressure on the company to nominate a new CEO and change its strategy.

Having lost two thirds of its value in the past two years, the Estée group has become an irresistibly undervalued asset for the shrewd financier and LVMH boss Bernard Arnault. Some industry insiders believe a mega transatlantic deal could be on the cards at some point. But in the short term, what is most likely is that LVMH buys a stake first and the Lauder family publicly welcomes the move, saying it shows how promising and attractive the company’s brands are.

LVMH did the same with the Tod’s Group. In 2021, it raised its stake from 3.2 percent to 10 percent. The company’s controlling family, the Della Valle, have said that if one day they were ready to sell the company, they would sell it to Arnault.

LVMH knows that it cannot go aggressive on the Lauder family. They are perceived as royalty in the United States. If it did, the group would run the risk of U.S. consumers turning against them and starting to boycott Tiffany & Co. Arnault is an intelligent man. He knows how important it is for LVMH to be well regarded in the United States.

Several fund managers told Miss Tweed earlier this month they were buying shares in the Estée company on the expectation that LVMH could buy a stake, make an offer or that an activist investor may acquire a significant holding. There is no visible evidence of LVMH buying shares in the Estée Lauder Companies. However, several industry sources believe the group could already be buying shares under the radar – like it did in Hermès 15 years ago using equity derivatives.

Last week, Miss Tweed reported several sources close to LVMH saying it was not keen to buy the Estée company because it was still struggling to digest its $16 billion acquisition of Tiffany & Co. The French group argued that it would not have enough captains to lead the ship since the acquisition of the U.S. jeweler. depleted its talent pool. Of course, many good people at the Estée company would stay, but LVMH would need to bring in a strong executive team of at least 20 people to get going, including a CEO, a few marketing maestros and regional chiefs.

LVMH does not want investors to know that it’s actually ready to take on the U.S. beauty giant now worth $44 billion on the stock market, up from $41 billion two weeks ago. “It’s clearly a major undervalued asset for Bernard Arnault,” one senior industry source said about LVMH’s CEO and controlling shareholder. “I am sure that Arnault is on this… and money is not a problem.”

PERFECT STORM
For LVMH, it’s the perfect storm. Investors lost faith in management after the company missed expectations several times this year and in 2022. The controlling Lauder family is divided over who should lead the group, making it an ideal target for Arnault, a past master at exploiting rifts within families. That’s how he got control of many prestigious brands including Guerlain and Hennessy.

Leonard Lauder, the 90-year-old patriarch, son of Estée, officially retired from the board at the annual shareholder meeting on Nov. 17. He remains the guardian of the family spirit and a highly respected and authoritative figure who turned the Estée Lauder Companies into a global multinational with an impressive portfolio of brands including M.A.C., La Mer, Jo Malone London and Tom Ford.

Like his niece Jane Lauder, 50, the second-biggest family shareholder after him, Leonard thinks it’s time for CEO Fabrizio Freda to go after nearly 15 years, during which he has pocketed several hundreds of millions of dollars, sources close to the company have said. The Lauder family needs to find a replacement, but no descendant of Estée has been selected yet to lead the company in the 21st century. There’s also a father-and-son rivalry going on as well. Leonard’s son William, 63, who is executive chairman, stands opposed to his father’s view and wants Freda to stay for now.

At the AGM, William reiterated “to the board, our stockholders and our employees that we remain steadfast in our commitment to the long-term continuity of the Estée Lauder Companies as a family-controlled enterprise, because we see the enormous and exciting potential of this business.”

REMEMBER THE HERMÈS HANDBAG WAR
If the Lauder family were willing to sell – which they are currently not – LVMH would surely make a move, industry insiders predict. And if they don’t want to sell, Arnault may find a way to get them to change their mind. He is a fine strategist. Let’s remember how LVMH took the Hermès family by surprise, announcing in 2010 that it had built up a 17 percent stake in the French luxury brand, which it would later increase to 23 percent. That year, Jean-Louis Dumas, the man who built Hermès into a global empire and designed the strategy still implemented today, passed away. Dumas was a visionary and the man who kept the Hermès family together. His disappearance made the Dumas, Guerrand and Puech controlling families – all descendants of Emile Hermès – vulnerable, and Arnault tried to take advantage of their grief and soul-searching.

Ultimately, Arnault did not win what the media dubbed the “handbag war.” He had to let go when Hermès family members united and created a controlling structure that made it impossible for any of them to sell their shares for two decades. When LVMH tried to buy Hermès – which it always denied – many Hermès family members, including people who were in banking and other sectors, joined the maker of the prized Kelly and Birkin handbags to defend it. At the AGM of the Estée group, Gary Lauder, 61, Leonard’s youngest son, a venture capitalist who has never been involved much with the company, joined the board. He may prove useful to help the family defend itself against Arnault if need be. The Lauder family have a 35 percent stake in the company but 84 percent of voting rights. Therefore, in theory, nothing can happen without their approval.

“LVMH are certainly not going to map out their plans, they don’t want anybody to know,” a senior industry source said. There is a strong rationale behind such a deal. For LVMH, it would boost its presence in North America, where its brands Dior, Guerlain and Givenchy could be stronger. Also, LVMH has suffered from a drop in wine and spirit sales in that region. “Diversification is the name of the game and beauty is a good bet,” the industry source said.

LVMH would bring Estée its marketing might and its ability to organize hard-hitting, high-profile events and ad campaigns with celebrities and influencers that get consumers’ attention and help its brands gain market share. The two groups could mutualize their distribution networks – fundamental to success in the beauty business. Together, they would represent a strong rival to L’Oréal, particularly in North America, where the French group would be dwarfed by this newly born behemoth.

WHAT ABOUT TOM FORD?
If LVMH made a bid, it’s likely that anti-trust regulators would force LVMH to sell parts of the Estée group, which it may want to do anyway as it may not want to take on all of the Estée group’s brands. It would be interesting to see how things would pan out for Tom Ford, the Estée company’s biggest success story. It owns the Tom Ford name, but the fashion brand business has been acquired by Italy’s Zegna Group. What would happen to that relationship if LVMH took over? This would be an interesting aspect of the deal if one was to come to the table.

Also, the Tom Ford brand has a perpetual license with Italian eyewear maker Marcolin. LVMH could strike a deal with Marcolin so that it continues to manufacture Tom Ford eyewear or buy the Italian company.

Marcolin’s private equity shareholder PAI Partners would no doubt be in favor of an LVMH bid. It’s been trying to find a buyer for Marcolin for years. The time has come to move on and sell its controlling stake. Last year, PAI Partners tried to sell Marcolin to U.S. eyewear company Marchon but the deal was scuppered by the announcement that the Tom Ford brand was being put up for sale, creating uncertainty about Marcolin’s future income, as Miss Tweed reported in July 2022.

The Tom Ford license represents more than half of Marcolin’s revenue. After the Estée Lauder Companies bought Tom Ford for $2.8 billion in November last year, Marcolin bought the Tom Ford eyewear business for €250 million this year. That means they own this business now. PAI Partners declined to comment.

LVMH knows it needs to tread carefully if it wants to buy the Estée Lauder Companies. Diplomacy will be key. LVMH and the Estée Lauder Companies declined to comment for this report.

WSJ : Origin Energy Bidder Doesn’t Know How Much Largest Shareholder Wants

Origin Energy Bidder Doesn’t Know How Much Largest Shareholder Wants
AustralianSuper, which owns about 17% of Origin, has consistently opposed a deal

SYDNEY—The consortium bidding to acquire Origin Energy ORG -0.35%decrease; red down pointing triangle for nearly US$11 billion still doesn’t know what price the Australian power company’s biggest shareholder wants to get a deal done, despite spending more than a year trying to win its support.

The lack of engagement with AustralianSuper prompted the bid group, led by Brookfield Asset Management, to start focusing on a backup offer for Origin that requires the support of fewer shareholders, EIG Global Energy Partners CEO R. Blair Thomas told The Wall Street Journal.

Details of that backup proposal by Brookfield and EIG’s MidOcean Energy unit were outlined by Origin last week. Their first offer remains live: Origin would be taken over and then broken up so that its liquefied natural gas interests would be owned by MidOcean, while Brookfield and Singapore sovereign-wealth funds Temasek and GIC would own the remaining energy markets assets.

Now, however, there is a second proposal given the likelihood that the first proposal fails to gather the support of shareholders owning 75% of Origin’s stock at a Dec. 4 meeting.

This second proposal involves Origin selling its generation and retail assets to Brookfield as a first step. Only later would EIG buy the slimmed-down Origin and its gas-production business.

AustralianSuper, which owns about 17% of Origin, has consistently opposed a deal. It says the bid group’s best-and-final price of 9.43 Australian dollars per share, equivalent to US$6.21, is too low given Origin’s assets and potential role in Australia’s energy transition. The pension fund also rebuffed an opportunity to retain an investment in Origin as an unlisted company once it was taken private by the consortium.

In an interview Monday, Thomas said AustralianSuper’s public rejection of that chance to join the consortium without any behind-the-scenes engagement was a “lightbulb moment” that led to the group pivoting toward its new approach.

“Brookfield bent over backwards and sent a letter to AustralianSuper offering one more time to try to engage, and AustralianSuper rejected it and released a letter without ever speaking to them,” Thomas said. “That was when it was obvious to me that this was just a waste of time.”

Thomas said that AustralianSuper’s Nov. 13 statement that it wouldn’t discuss taking a post-takeover interest in Origin marked the point at which the consortium began to more tightly focus on its so-called Plan B. AustralianSuper which is the country’s largest superannuation fund with about A$300 billion in assets under management, declined to comment.

“Up until then, we had spent the better part of a year thinking it was just a matter of time until we got engagement and we would reach some commercial understanding,” Thomas said.

In its earlier public statements, AustralianSuper has indicated that it wants to remain invested for the long term. It has steadily increased its stake from less than 13% in March, which was when Origin agreed to back a takeover.

Origin is Australia’s fourth-largest emitter of greenhouse gasses because much of the electricity that it generates comes from plants that burn thermal coal. But its retail brand, assets, and grid connectivity make it an appealing target for investors seeking to bet on the energy transition.

Brookfield says it wants to accelerate Origin’s investment in renewables and storage assets. It said it would spend between A$20 billion and A$30 billion building out Origin’s renewables and storage assets over the decade to 2033, far outstripping Origin’s suggestion of a more than A$3 billion investment. Brookfield says opposition to the bid, which it views as compelling, is limited to a handful of shareholders.

“I can’t tell you exactly what it is they want,” Thomas said of AustralianSuper. “They haven’t told us exactly what would get them to say ‘yes’. They haven’t told us what they think fair value is. They haven’t shared any of their analysis.”

The Origin board is considering the backup offer, which last week it said appears inferior.

“These things are jigsaw puzzles,” Thomas said. “I wouldn’t expect there to be wholesale changes but I do think there are some things around the margin that we can do that would make it more attractive for the board.”

>>> Stoxx 600 Pre-Market Indications

  • AMS-Osram (DQW1 TH) +2.7%
  • Sanofi (SNW TH) +1%
    • Sanofi’s Dupixent Shows Strong Efficacy in Second Lung Trial
  • Diageo (GUI TH) +0.9%
  • Coloplast (CBHD TH) +0.9%
  • Vodafone (VODI TH) +0.9%
  • Nel (D7G TH) +0.7%
  • Enel (ENL TH) +0.6%
  • Maersk (DP4B TH) +0.5%
  • NIBE Industrier (NJB TH) +0.4%
  • Novo (NOV TH) +0.4%
  • Equinor (DNQ TH) -1%
  • Evotec SE (EVT TH) -1.1%
  • Air France-KLM (AFR0 TH) -1.1%
  • Rio Tinto (RIO1 TH) -1.1%
  • JDE Peet’s (JDE TH) -1.2%
  • Erste (EBO TH) -1.4%
  • Thyssenkrupp (TKA TH) -1.4%
  • BASF (BAS TH) -1.6%
    • BASF Downgraded at Morgan Stanley on Cost Curve Challenges
  • HelloFresh (HFG TH) -1.7%
    • HelloFresh Cut to Add at AlphaValue/Baader

>>> TradeGate Pre-Market Indications

DAX:
  • BASF (BAS TH) -1.6%
    • BASF Downgraded at Morgan Stanley on Cost Curve Challenges
MDAX:
  • Redcare Pharmacy NV (RDC TH) +0.8%
  • Vitesco (VTSC TH) -0.6%
    • *SCHAEFFLER INCREASES OFFER PRICE FOR VITESCO TO €94/SHR
  • HelloFresh (HFG TH) -1.4%
    • HelloFresh Cut to Add at AlphaValue/Baader
SDAX:
  • SFC Energy (F3C TH) +4.4%
    • SFC Energy AG announces mid-term targets for 2028
  • SGL (SGL TH) +2.3%
  • MorphoSys (MOR TH) +1.5%
  • BayWa (BYW6 TH) -2%