CrunchBase : Andreessen Horowitz Closes In On Up To $7B In New Funds — Report

Andreessen Horowitz Closes In On Up To $7B In New Funds — Report

Andreessen Horowitz, known for early bets on then-startups such as Facebook, Instagram and Airbnb, is reportedly “weeks away” from closing on as much as $7 billion in new funds.

A16z is targeting $6.9 billion for a “master feeder fund,” per the report in Axios. The firm expects a final close in early April on between $6.5 billion and $7 billion.

Per the report, half of the raise — as much as $3.5 billion — would go to the firm’s fourth growth fund. A16z announced its last growth fund in early 2022 at $5 billion, so the new growth fund would be significantly less.

The firm also is not raising dedicated early-stage or seed-stage funds, but instead splitting money by subsector. That will include 15% for an AI infrastructure fund and an AI apps fund, and also 10% for an “American dynamism” fund which would support national interests such as aerospace, defense, public safety, education, housing, supply chain, industrials and manufacturing.

There also will be a 10% allocation for a gaming fund.

The new venture market
It was just late last year when firm founder Marc Andreessen penned his “The Techno-Optimist Manifesto.” The 5,000-word “manifesto” basically says technology is the cure for — not the cause of — the world’s ills and comes complete with an enemy list and even a “meaning of life” entry.

Despite the optimism, a16z has actually seen its deal flow fall every quarter since Q1 2023, per Crunchbase data. However, it should stop that streak this quarter.

News of the new funds come as venture firms are still struggling with the downturn in the industry. Earlier in the week, The Information reported Boston-based OpenView Venture Partners plans to return 75% of a $571 million fund it raised a year ago to its limited partners. Late last year the firm decided to wind down.

There have been reports that other firms have had trouble raising new funds after struggling to give LPs significant returns after the salad days of 2021. ​​Even some large, well-established firms had to change fundraising plans last year to adjust to the evolving market this year, as both San Francisco-based Founders Fund and New York-based Tiger Global announced cuts to their new funds.

CrunchBase : Startups Are Still Buying Fewer StartupsB In New Funds — Report

Startups Are Still Buying Fewer Startups

For venture-backed startups, it’s historically rather common to wind up selling to another startup. Lately, however, the pace of these deals has been slowing down.

In all of 2023, just over 650 funded startups globally were acquired by other funded startups, per Crunchbase data, the lowest total in three years. This year, meanwhile, is off to a similarly slow start, as charted below:


Smaller deals
Disclosed deal sizes have also been skewing smaller. True, there are exceptions, like Databricks’ $1.3 billion purchase of MosaicML last summer. But overall, the median disclosed-size deal in 2023 was around $30 million, down from about $40 million in 2022.

The disclosed numbers provide a very limited view, however. That’s because in the vast majority of these deals, buyers don’t reveal what they paid.

Even so, it’s likely few are home-run exits. Generally speaking, when a startup buys another startup during a tough fundraising environment, the acquired company’s founders and investors aren’t getting a huge return on their investment, observed Healy Jones, vice president of financial strategy at startup advisory firm Kruze Consulting.

Rather, in an environment of falling startup valuations across many sectors, the goal for a sale tends to be more modest. If an acquisition can make investors whole, generate some return for founders, and provide employees with good jobs going forward, it’s commonly considered worth pursuing.

Big acquirers aren’t biting
Given that overall M&A activity is down, the actual share of startup acquisitions where the acquirer is another startup remains pretty high.

Since the beginning of last year, for instance, more than 80% of acquired startups — roughly 766 companies — sold to another startup, per Crunchbase data. Just 142 startups sold to public companies.

Large-cap technology companies, in particular, have not been active startup buyers in recent quarters. Selling to one of the “Big Five” most valuable U.S. tech companies — Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Nvidia — is no longer a realistic avenue to exit.

While they don’t lack cash, antitrust concerns are a big worry for large-cap acquirers these days. Even when they do announce large purchases — like Adobe’s planned acquisition of Figma — there’s a risk that regulators will object. Startups, by contrast, are far less likely to attract regulatory scrutiny for their M&A forays.

Large-cap acquirers also have other reasons for holding back on M&A dealmaking, Healy observed. Taxes are a big issue, as large companies don’t want to open themselves up to new avenues of taxation. “There’s a reason Apple is one of the most profitable companies in the world and they pay very little in taxes,” he said.

Because public company valuations are so dependent on meeting or exceeding analyst expectations, there’s also reticence to make M&A moves that could jeopardize earnings predictability.

Startups are stuck with startups
Just like a game of musical chairs, startups looking for a partner have limited options. When cash is running low, and an acquisition looks like the most promising strategy, another startup may be the only willing and available buyer.

While they’re probably not paying top dollar, one upside is that there’s still opportunity for the acquiree to see its technology and products scale — albeit maybe under a new name.

Business Of Fashion : Why Frasers Group Shuttered Matchesfashion

Why Frasers Group Shuttered Matchesfashion
In the latest blow to the luxury e-commerce sector, the embattled Matches is closing down just over two months after being acquired by Frasers Group as relationships with brands have reportedly soured.

Frasers Group is putting Matchesfashion into administration, just over two months after the retail giant acquired the struggling luxury e-tailer for £52 million ($66.6 million), The Business of Fashion has confirmed.

Frasers Group originally bought Matchesfashion (which rebranded to Matches late last year) to increase its position in luxury, but brands have begun to sever ties with Matches as some of them have not received payments for months, according to a report in Sky News.

“Whilst Matches’ management team has tried to find a way to stabilise the business, it has become clear that too much change would be required to restructure it, and the continued funding requirements would be far in excess of amounts that the Group considers to be viable,” Frasers Group said in a statement. “In light of this, Frasers has been informed that the directors of Matches have taken the decision to put the Matches group into administration. Frasers remains committed to the luxury market and its brand partners.”

It’s an unfortunate conclusion that was once inconceivable for Matches. Founded in the late 1980s by Tom and Ruth Chapman as a brick-and-mortar store in London, Matches was once a profitable company renowned for its curated selection of emerging brands. It eventually went online in 2007, launching a storefront and app that grew to carry more than 500 top luxury brands, including Balenciaga and Gucci.


In 2017, private-equity firm Apax Partners acquired Matches at a reported $1 billion valuation, and by 2019, the company’s sales peaked at £431 million. But once the pandemic hit in 2020, Matches’ losses soon began to mount: It struggled to navigate lockdown restrictions as competition from e-commerce rivals such as Farfetch, Net-a-Porter and Mytheresa ramped up. Apax Partners also pumped millions in improving Matches’ backend operations and the user experience on the site.

Matches shuffled through four chief executives in four years before hiring former ASOS CEO Nick Beighton in 2022 to grow the business. Beighton overhauled the executive team, installing industry veterans from Farfetch and Frasers Group as chief commercial officer, chief financial officer and chief operating officer. He also increased the number of brands offered on the platform and introduced a rental service.

But those initiatives did little to improve the company’s fortunes. Matches ended fiscal 2023 with £40 million in losses on the basis of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation, up from £25 million in the previous year. Its sales also dropped to £380 million during the same period.

Matches’ grim ending is the most severe outcome so far of the ailing luxury e-commerce sector’s continuing woes. Retailers including Farfetch and Net-a-Porter went from industry darlings to cautionary tales as digital customer-acquisition costs ballooned and pressure to discount crippled margins. Perhaps most consequentially, luxury brands have increasingly reduced their wholesale presence as they’ve encouraged consumers to buy directly on their own e-commerce sites, putting the brands themselves in direct competition with platforms like Matches.

London-based Farfetch, which connects luxury boutiques to its marketplace and provides e-commerce software for brands and retailers, narrowly escaped bankruptcy when it was acquired by South Korean e-commerce giant Coupang last December. In February, the company’s founder, José Neves, and a cadre of other top executives exited the business. Crucial brand partners like Gucci have stopped selling on its marketplace, validating fears that Farfetch will lose value under Coupang’s ownership.

Frasers Group’s decision to shutter Matches also highlights growing impatience among investors that were once eager to pump money into luxury e-commerce. Other pioneering luxury e-tailers are at risk of suffering the same fate. Swiss luxury conglomerate Richemont attempted to sell Yoox-Net-a-Porter to Farfetch before the platform landed in its own financial troubles. The fate of YNAP, which continues to be a loss leader for Richemont, also hangs in the balance as the company continues to seek a buyer.

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:
  • ASLE -20.1%, BBAI -18.9%, GCO -15.5%, RWAY -14.6%, COOK -13.1%, PBR -11.5%, MGNX -9.8%, DOMO -8.9%, MDB -8.5%, CTOS -7.7%, SVV -7.1%, ARCT -5.6%, MRVL -5.5% (also authorizes new $3 bln share repurchase program), COST -4.1%, EOLS -2%, AVGO -1.6%, METC -1.6%, NAPA -1.5%
Other news:
  • AMLX -78.8% (topline results from PHOENIX a global)
  • DKL -11.3% (prices offering of 3116884 common units at $38.50 per unit)
  • RDNT -8% (prices offering of 4.55 mln shares of common stock at $44.00 per share)
  • MAX -7.1% (launches 3 mln share offering)
  • NDLS -6.9% (names new CEO)
  • CLAR -5.1% (Board of Directors approves two of its top shareholders to increase their positions up to 15.0% and 26.7% of shares outstanding)
  • APGE -1.9% (prices offering of 6774193 shares of common stock at $62.00 per share)
  • AGCO -1.6% (files mixed shelf securities offering)
  • AVO -1.6% (names new COO)
  • AKRO -1.5% (announces publication of Phase 2b SYMMETRY Cohort D Study)
  • MBI -1.4% (CFO to step down names new CFO)
  • ZYME -1.3% (files for 5086521 shares of common stock by selling shareholders)
  • FWRG -1.2% (6 mln share offering)
Analyst comments:
  • AKA -5.7% (downgraded to Hold from Buy at Truist)
  • FIGS -2.6% (downgraded to Perform from Outperform at Oppenheimer)
  • AVAV -2.2% (downgraded to Neutral from Outperform at Robert Baird)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:
  • PRCH +22.8%, IOT +15.2%, HCI +9.9%, SWBI +9.7%, DOCU +9.2%, FNKO +8.9% (also CFO/ COO Steve Nave to resign; names new CFO; COO position to remain unfilled), GPS +7.9%, GRND +7.9%, SNPO +5.1%, LOCO +3.6%, TGB +3%, TSM +2.9% (Feb revs), AQN +2%, GWRE +1.2%
Other news:
  • DAWN +16% (amended Viracta License Agreement)
  • KYTX +4.2% (Kyverna Therapeutics and Stanford University Agree to Evaluate KYV-101 in Patients with Non-Relapsing and Progressive Forms of Multiple Sclerosis)
  • LCTX +3.5% (files $200 mln mixed shelf securities offering)
  • ATHA +2.9% (presents clinical and preclinical data supporting therapeutic potential of fosgonimeton in alzheimer's and parkinson's diseases at AD/PD 2024 International Conference)
  • SPRY +1.7% (reviews recent clinical updates and commercial opportunity)
  • ML +1.1% (files $50 mln mixed shelf securities offering)
  • LDOS +1% (awarded $158 mln US Air Force contract)
Analyst comments:
  • CVNA +5.8% (upgraded to Sector Perform from Underperform at RBC Capital Mkts)
  • GE +1% (upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JP Morgan)

WWD : As It Prepares to Raise Prices Again, Chanel Explains Why Its Classic Flap

As It Prepares to Raise Prices Again, Chanel Explains Why Its Classic Flap Bag Is a Great Investment
A global campaign featuring Brad Pitt and Penélope Cruz emphasizes the timeless nature of the iconic handbag.

PARIS — With a high-profile advertising campaign featuring Brad Pitt and Penélope Cruz, Chanel is launching a major push in the handbag category designed to set it apart from competitors and underline the long-term value of its classic flap bag.

The French luxury house unveiled the film earlier this week at the start of creative director Virginie Viard’s fall ready-to-wear show, ahead of a global launch on March 27 that will include print, outdoor, cinema and digital, including paid social advertisements.

“For us, the bag is one of the icons of the brand and to talk about an icon, who better than two icons?” Bruno Pavlovsky, president of fashion and president of Chanel SAS, told WWD in an exclusive interview.

Chanel decided to make the focus its 11.12 handbag, a reinterpretation of the 2.55 handbag launched by Karl Lagerfeld when he took the creative helm of the house in 1983.

In recent years the brand has steadily raised the price tag of its star product, placing it in the same bracket as rival Hermès while launching trademark infringement lawsuits against luxury secondhand retailers The RealReal and What Goes Around Comes Around.

As it prepares for another round of price increases, the house wants to emphasize the longevity of the design, which guarantees that unlike its seasonal offerings, it will never go out of style.

“Aside from ready-to-wear, this bag is the only thing that Mademoiselle Chanel, Karl and Virginie have in common. It’s the one you see again and again on the runway,” Pavlovsky said.

“At Chanel, we like to call it a ‘couturière’ bag,” the executive continued, noting that founder Gabrielle “Coco” Chanel was inspired by men’s military satchels to create her signature bag with chain straps.

“The way it’s constructed and produced is really in a ‘couturière’ style because it’s sewn and turned inside out. It’s constructed like a jacket,” he explained. “That’s what sets us apart from many other brands in terms of technique. We approach it as fashion, not necessarily as leather goods.”

The campaign film, directed by Inez van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadin, shows Pitt and Cruz reenacting the roles originally played by Anouk Aimée and Jean-Louis Trintignant in the classic French film “Un homme et une femme” (“A Man and a Woman”) — including the restaurant scene where they flirt with a Chanel bag conspicuously placed on the table.

Marion Destenay Falempin, image director for fashion at Chanel, said director Claude Lelouch gave his permission for the remake, and even makes a cameo walking his dog on the boardwalk in the French seaside town of Deauville, where the ads were shot.

“He told us that the Chanel bag placed on the table was the one that Anouk Aimée used in real life,” she said, noting that Aimée was a close friend of Coco Chanel.

“When we were thinking about who would be this iconic couple in 2024, 57 years after the original film, Penélope Cruz immediately came to mind, because she really carries forward the history of seductive, inspiring and strong women at Chanel,” Destenay Falempin said.

Cruz has been a face of Chanel since 2018, and Viard had long wanted to bring back Pitt, who in 2012 became the first male ambassador for its bestselling No.5 perfume. The two actors costarred in Ridley Scott’s 2013 crime thriller “The Counselor” but had never been cast opposite each other as romantic leads.

“It was through this campaign and this shoot that they finally met,” said Destenay Falempin. “Virginie loves New Wave cinema, and so does Penélope. And Brad sang the ‘da ba da ba da’ theme song for three days straight. We ended up singing it all together.”

Chanel is a partner of the Deauville American Film Festival, which this year celebrates its 50th anniversary, so the timing of the homage made sense. Beyond that, Deauville was where Chanel launched her business in 1912, revolutionizing fashion with her sleek, fluid designs that helped to liberate women from their corsets.

The company has since grown into a megabrand, with revenues of $17 billion in 2022, up 17 percent year-on-year. Roughly half of those gains were due to price increases, and the rest volume, according to chief financial officer Philippe Blondiaux.

For the past few years, Chanel has increased its prices in March and September, and Pavlovsky confirmed another round of hikes was imminent, despite the slowdown in luxury spending that is causing many brands to ease up on price increases. He declined to provide additional details, except to say the rise will be in line with inflation.

“We’re not chasing a market positioning, but we’re raising our prices to cover our costs. Most of our competitors have already increased their prices this year. We haven’t raised ours, so yes, there will be an increase fairly soon,” he said.

With regional price differentials smoothed out, the increase will be the same everywhere, except for Japan, where prices will go up a little extra to compensate for the weakness of the yen, he added.

The price of a Chanel Medium Classic bag has gone from $5,800 in 2019 to $10,200 in 2024, an increase of 75 percent, according to New York-based reseller Madison Avenue Couture. While the current price matches the one on Chanel’s website, the brand said it does not confirm historical data.

Its strategy of exclusivity has prompted grumbling from certain customers, with some even threatening a boycott, but Pavlovsky was sanguine.

“Price increases can become an issue when the quality doesn’t match the cost. We work very hard continuously to reinforce the quality of our products,” he said, citing growing competition to source the best quality leather and the cost of training staff.

“The iconic bag requires 278 steps, and that’s a real skill. Before they can master every stage, craftspeople must spend several years in the workshop. That’s something we want to preserve now more than ever, so we will pay what it takes to ensure the quality of our products is always beyond reproach,” he added.

He believes connoisseurs of the brand understand that its lambskin tends to be more fragile than grained calfskin — an indirect response to those that have complained of wear and tear on the delicate material. “It’s really the most sophisticated, the most exceptional quality, so you have to be more careful,” Pavlovsky said.

“I understand the price may be perceived as very high, but we’re talking about a luxury product, so not everyone is able to deliver that. People also come to us for this historic know-how of the brand, which in my opinion justifies the price,” he added. “When you talk about watches and cars, you see that there’s no limit.”

While Chanel maintains it does not implement quotas, Pavlovsky noted it has waiting lists for certain styles. And he sought to reassure clients that the brand is not trying to block them from reselling their bags, despite its recent win against What Goes Around Comes Around following a protracted battle in a New York federal court.

“Our customers are free to sell their products on the secondary market. That’s fine by us,” said the executive, who added the onus is on sellers to provide sales receipts and certificates to verify the authenticity of the goods, since Chanel considers that resale platforms are not qualified to provide that service independently.

“We call on marketplaces to respect the brands,” he continued. “You can’t use brand codes without permission. That’s the first thing. And secondly, only Chanel, or only the original brand, can authenticate its products.”

With bag prices easily in the five figures, Chanel has been adding private salons to most of its stores, including its recently reopened shop-in-shop at department store Galeries Lafayette’s flagship in Paris. “If you look at the last 10 years, the average size of our stores has virtually doubled because we need these intimate spaces for customers who require privacy,” he explained.

In addition, the brand is opening more dedicated spaces for its “Chanel & moi” program, which offers after-sales services including restoring and repair. Each bag or wallet on chain comes with a five-year warranty.

“We plan to open them in virtually all the big cities where we have a presence,” Pavlovsky said. After Hong Kong, Japan and London, the next locations will be in South Korea and New York City.