9to5 : Here are the cars that support Apple Wallet’s car key feature

Here are the cars that support Apple Wallet’s car key feature

At WWDC in 2020, Apple announced a new car key feature that lets people use the Wallet app on the iPhone or Apple Watch to control their car. While adoption of this feature has been slow, head below to find the full list of cars that support Apple car key integration.

What is Apple car key?
This feature lets users add their car key to the Wallet app, then use the wallet app to lock, unlock, and start their car. While specific implementations vary depending on the carmaker, there are a few different ways Apple’s car key feature can be used:

  • Passive entry: Approach your car with your device, it unlocks, start your car when inside, and walk away from your car with your device, it locks.
  • Proximity: Lock, unlock, and start the car by holding your device close to the door handle or key reader.
  • Remotely: You can use your device to remote lock and unlock your car, and use other features.

The car key feature also includes support for Express Mode. This feature allows you to use your car key without unlocking your device, or authenticating with Face ID, Touch ID, or a passcode. The Wallet app also supports sharing your car key using things like Messages, Mail, and AirDrop.

What cars support Apple car key?

BMW
2021 – 2023 1 Series
2021 – 2023 2 Series
2021 – 2023 3 Series
2021 – 2023 4 Series
2021 – 2023 5 Series
2021 – 2023 6 Series
2021 – 2023 8 Series
2021 – 2023 X5
2021 – 2023 X6
2021 – 2023 X7
2021 – 2023 X5 M
2021 – 2023 X6 M
2021 – 2023 Z4
2022 – 2023 i4
2022 – 2023 iX
2022 – 2023 iX1
2022 – 2023 iX3
2023 i3
2023 i7
2024 i5


BYD
2022 – 2023 HAN

Genesis
2023 GV60
2023 G90

Hyundai
2023 Palisade
2023 IONIQ 6
2024 Kona EV

Kia
2023 Telluride
2023 Niro
2024 Seltos
2024 EV9

Lotus
Emeya EV

Mercedes-Benz
2024 E‑Class

More to come?
As of right now, these are the only cars that Apple says support car key. Ideally, adoption will only continue to grow, but we’ll have to wait for more announcements from automakers to know for sure.

Barrons : FOMO Is Dead. Welcome to the ‘OMO’ Stock Market.

FOMO Is Dead. Welcome to the ‘OMO’ Stock Market.

FOMO, or the “fear of missing out,” is a well-known social-media phenomenon. Now, one investment strategist says she is OMO—“OK missing out”—when it comes to this year’s stock market rally because she’s nervous about earnings and how high prices have gotten.

“I wouldn’t be taking as big of a risk because of valuations,” says Julie Biel, chief market strategist at Kayne Anderson Rudnick, an investment firm with nearly $60 billion in assets under management. “It’s terrifying how narrow the rally has been.”

Stocks had a tough week, with the S&P 500 index dropping about 1% and the Dow Jones Industrial Average down nearly 2% following the hotter-than-hoped-for consumer inflation report released on Wednesday. Valuations, though, still look stretched—the S&P 500 is trading for more than 21 times 2024 earnings estimates, above its average for the past five and 10 years, after gaining 8% this year.

“You need growth to surprise to the upside,” Biel says. “If not, high multiples can get compressed, and that can happen quickly. Investors will run for the exits.”

And growth is what corporations need to deliver when they report first-quarter earnings and guidance for the rest of the year.


Several big financials kicked off the profit parade with mixed results on Friday. Wells Fargo and Citigroup shares had muted moves, but JPMorgan Chase fell as CEO Jamie Dimon warned that “the global landscape is unsettling” and that “persistent inflationary pressures...may likely continue.” Goldman Sachs Group, Bank of America, and Morgan Stanley report this coming week. So do Taiwan Semiconductor, Johnson & Johnson, and UnitedHealth Group as well as United Airlines, CSX, Procter & Gamble, and Netflix.

Analysts are expecting profit growth of just 3.6% for companies in the S&P 500 for the first quarter, according to FactSet. And that’s being driven largely by tech—think Nvidia, Super Micro Computer, and artificial intelligence—and parts of healthcare, namely weight-loss-drug makers Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk.

“We’re still seeing this dichotomy or dispersion in earnings,” says Joe Amato, chief investment officer at Neuberger Berman, noting that profits for companies in many other cyclical sectors might actually decline in the first quarter.

Earnings are expected to improve as the year progresses; second-quarter profits are forecast to rise nearly 10% and earnings for all of 2024 are estimated to be up 11% from 2023 levels. “We should start to see better balance,” Amato said. “Companies should gain some earnings momentum because of the resilience of the U.S. economy.”

It’s put up or shut up time. Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise Financial, says he’s unsure whether consumers and corporate customers can continue to spend enough to support broader earnings growth. Overall inflation may be receding—or not—but many Americans still feel tapped out, particularly as rent costs and gas prices keep soaring. “A lot of companies are finding it to be a harder time to raise prices,” Saglimbene says.

Hopefully, demand for goods and services won’t evaporate. Wall Street needs strong earnings even more than usual as rate cut hopes fade. The good news is that stocks usually follow profits, so strong earnings growth—even in the face of higher interest rates—could offset worries about inflation and a less-dovish Federal Reserve.

Is that asking too much?

FT : In defence of Europe’s tankmakers

In defence of Europe’s tankmakers
Thanks to the turbulent geopolitical environment, weapons manufacturers are having a moment

A fondness for European defence stocks has been a somewhat oddball hobby for most of the last decade or two, but like V-neck jumpers, the sector is firmly back in fashion. So much so, in fact, that it is looking a little overdone. (I didn’t realise the jumpers were out either, but our style pages informed me of my ignorance last week.)

Many investors succeeded in ignoring the defence sector altogether for years, particularly in the period before Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. It was, of course, naivety in retrospect but compelling at the time.

Makers of bullets, bombs and tanks fell from favour at the height of the sustainable investing boom. When asset managers could barely open their mouths without uttering the letters E, S and G — investment with environmental, social or governance aims — this sector often got the cold shoulder. Again, Vladimir Putin has succeeded in reminding well-meaning money managers that funding companies that try to protect non-aggressor states from harm can still sit comfortably in a virtue-seeking portfolio. In a client podcast last month, Ian Douglas-Pennant, an analyst covering the sector for UBS Research, joked that his client visits across continental Europe now are often characterised by fund managers asking him for a rundown on everything they have missed while they have been hunting for opportunities elsewhere or constrained by ESG considerations. “Can you bring me up to speed on the last 20 years?” they ask. He is happy to oblige.

The performance of the sector this year has been really something. While shiny US tech stocks and chipmakers have sucked in the bulk of fund managers’ attention, European defence has, if you’ll pardon the pun, rocketed. Goldman Sachs’s basket of European defence stocks has pushed 40 per cent higher just this year.


Demand for the sector has clearly woken up. Investment manager VanEck said its exchange-traded fund tracking European defence companies has drawn in $500mn in the year since it launched — a build-up that “illustrates the importance of defence nowadays for investors”, said Martijn Rozemuller, chief executive of VanEck Europe. “Traditionally, the defence industry has been a rather sensitive topic, especially in Europe. However, the outbreak of war in Ukraine and other areas of tension and conflict around the world have changed the way many people view defence policy.”

Among the striking examples in the sector, stocks in the UK’s BAE Systems have climbed by 15 per cent this year — streets ahead of the broader UK index. Germany’s Rheinmetall, which makes ammunition, is up a staggering 83 per cent. Bavaria’s Renk has gained 71 per cent just since it listed in February. Among other things, Renk makes slide bearings for tanks. I do not know what tank slide bearings are, and many other buyers of the shares probably do not either, but they do know that with conflict under way in both Israel and Ukraine, and commitments from a host of European governments to lift defence spending, betting on good fortune for companies in the sector makes sense.

These stocks are tiny flecks in comparison to the giant that is Nvidia, with its market capitalisation north of $2tn, but some of the gains are of a similar magnitude, if not bigger. As Douglas-Pennant at UBS points out, plenty of fund managers are latching on to the phenomenon. 

Nothing moves in a straight line in markets, and so it is perhaps no surprise that this week, the trend came a little unstuck. Rheinmetall shed 7 per cent, while BAE dropped 4.5 per cent. It was the worst day for the sector since the 2020 Covid crisis blasted markets.

This still leaves these stocks standing far above where they started the year, but nonetheless, it is a serious knock. One trigger for this appears to have been a note from Goldman Sachs, in which analysts Peter Oppenheimer and Sharon Bell, among others, said while they are “relatively constructive on the European defence outlook, we are not recommending EU defence given the challenging valuation premium and strong run of outperformance”.

The sector has, they suggested, simply done just too well for its own good. Goldman’s basket of related stocks has pushed higher almost constantly since the invasion of Ukraine, leaving them with valuations some 45 per cent higher than the broader market, compared with an average lag of 7 per cent. Time, it seems, for some investors to pause.

It is rare to find a sector in Europe that drops back simply because it has been such a runaway success. Luxury — Europe’s other key investment theme — has taken a hit from investor unease at Kering’s strategy and at the slow-burning economic malaise in China. They are both meaningful reasons for weakness, but not quite the same thing. 

For defence, this week’s wobble stems from a broad community of investors who ignored the sector for years, now hugging it a little too tightly. Longer term, though, it is hard to see a strong case for a serious decline. The US may have its shiny AI stocks but in this geopolitical environment, the manufacturers of Europe’s bullets and tanks really count for something.

WSJ : The EV Battery of Your Dreams Is Coming

The EV Battery of Your Dreams Is Coming
Quiet developments signal that over the next five years we will see technological leaps

In the next five years, significant upgrades to the batteries in electric vehicles should finally hit the market. In the works for decades, these changes are likely to mean that by 2030, gas vehicles will cost more than their electric equivalents; some EVs will charge as quickly as filling up at a gas station; and super long-range EVs will make the phrase “range anxiety” seem quaint.

One reason you might not be aware of these impending technological leaps is that they’ve long been overshadowed by flashier efforts at replacing existing lithium-ion battery tech in EVs altogether. Again and again, those promised battery “breakthroughs” failed to break through, which has left investors holding the bag and consumers disappointed.

Almost all of these coming developments are upgrades to the same tried-and-true lithium batteries that others have promised to disrupt. This gives them a huge advantage: They can be manufactured in existing facilities, and fit into existing supply chains. This matters because previous investments in battery-manufacturing capacity are so enormous—more than $30 billion in 2023 alone, according to BloombergNEF—that they make it that much harder for any technology that can’t be manufactured in those facilities to be competitive.

BMW’s 2025 battery rollout
It’s possible to optimize many features in a battery, from how fast it can charge to how many years it can last. One of the most important measures of a battery’s performance is how much energy a manufacturer can cram into a given battery cell, which is known as its energy density. Typically, that energy density has gone up a few percentage points a year, and it’s those slow, cumulative, hard-won gains that have gotten us to where we are today.

Bigger jumps in the energy density of batteries are rare. But BMW recently announced that it will begin selling the first vehicle using the company’s new platform for EVs, which it calls “Neue Klasse,” in 2025. These vehicles will have a new kind of battery which will hold more than 20% more energy than the previous type, and charging speed and range will also improve by up to 30%, says a BMW spokesman.

What makes possible these improvements are a new, cylindrical shape for the battery cells, and tweaks to their chemistry.

New battery chemistries in 2026
Massachusetts-based battery-component manufacturer SES AI is on track to help automakers deliver vehicles with an additional leap in the energy density of their batteries in 2026, says Chief Executive Qichao Hu.

SES AI is already the first company in the world to deliver to an automaker advanced prototypes of batteries with a particular kind of new tech, and is working with GM, Hyundai and Honda. In 2025, SES AI expects to deliver the next iteration of its cells, which are suitable for use in a fleet of prototype vehicles.

If GM decides that the first vehicles to get SES AI’s new batteries should be, say, electric Hummers, then the company would help GM build 100 prototype Hummer EVs with the new technology, and they would then be run through a gantlet of tests for nine months to a year, Hu says. If all goes well, by 2026 the batteries should be ready to be put into production.

The key to SES AI’s technology is solid lithium metal, which is used in place of the graphite that’s in today’s lithium-ion batteries.

Battery 101
To understand why that matters, it helps to know a little bit about how today’s batteries work. A typical EV battery is like a sandwich made of thin layers. First there’s what’s known as an anode, made of graphite. Suffusing the whole cell is a liquid electrolyte—like Gatorade, but it has lithium salts instead of sodium. Then a thin “separator”—picture something like saran wrap. Finally there’s a cathode, which is a mix of various metals, typically lithium, nickel, manganese and cobalt.

When a battery is pushing electricity to the motor of a vehicle, lithium ions are moving between the anode and the cathode, through the plastic separator, which has microscopic holes just big enough for lithium ions to move through. It’s the physical movement of those lithium ions from one side of the battery sandwich to the other that generates current.

In theory, a lithium metal anode can hold 10 times as many lithium ions as a graphite one. All other things being equal, this means the energy density of a battery using lithium metal in place of graphite could be up to 50% higher.

The result, says Hu, is that automakers could someday offer affordable EVs that have the same range as today’s high-end ones. That would mean even entry-level EVs might go 300 miles on a charge. High-end EVs with bigger batteries could, in turn, set new records for range, besting current record-holders which top out at around 500 miles.

Because the lithium metal in SES AI’s batteries replaces just one part of the battery cell, it can be incorporated into existing assembly lines. Currently, there are two dominant types of batteries for EVs, one optimized for high-end vehicles, and the other for lower-cost ones such as Tesla’s Model 3 and the coming tidal wave of affordable Chinese EVs. SES AI’s lithium metal technology works in both.

Superfast charging by 2028
SES AI is hardly the only company promising significant upgrades to today’s batteries within the next few years. StoreDot, a battery startup based in Israel, is working on new battery tech for making EVs charge so quickly that filling them up could someday be comparable to stopping at a gas station in a conventional vehicle.

StoreDot counts BP, Daimler Truck, Volvo and Vietnamese EV maker VinFast as investors and partners. StoreDot has announced that the first automaker to incorporate its batteries for “ultrafast charging” will be Geely-owned Polestar.

Like SES AI, StoreDot aims to replace the graphite anode in a typical battery with something different. Instead of lithium metal, StoreDot is using silicon in order to increase both the energy density and the charging speed of a battery.

Adding silicon to batteries is something battery makers have been doing for years, and has been key to some of the incremental gains in capacity that have already happened in the past decade. What’s different about StoreDot’s tech is that the company is figuring out how to replace the graphite in batteries entirely, with a substance that is up to 40% silicon.

StoreDot has delivered prototype batteries to automakers, and its current tech—which Polestar is testing—can enable a car’s battery to add 100 miles of range in just five minutes of charging. By 2028—just two years after SES AI’s batteries are set to debut in production vehicles—the company’s engineers aim to deliver to automakers a battery that can add 100 miles of range in just 3 minutes, says Chief Executive Doron Myersdorf.

2030 and beyond—the ‘Holy Grail’ of battery tech?
Briefly a darling of the 2020 to 2021-era SPAC boom, publicly traded solid-state battery maker QuantumScape has since had a rough time, in terms of its valuation. But the company is on track to deliver its first batteries suitable for testing in vehicles by sometime next year, says Quantumscape’s chief technology officer, Tim Holme. From there, it’s up to automakers to determine how quickly they’ll incorporate these batteries into new vehicles.

BMW is currently working with QuantumScape competitor Solid Power on developing solid-state batteries, but “all-solid-state batteries are still several years away from large scale production,” says a BMW spokesman.

Solid-state batteries have been called the holy grail of battery tech because, in theory, they should be able to beat existing batteries by every measure that counts, including charge time and energy density. But they come with a number of challenges, including the way they physically expand and contract when they are charged and discharged.

QuantumScape Chief Marketing Officer Asim Hussain says the company has solved this problem, and many others, and that unlike many of its competitors, it regularly releases test data showing the performance and durability of its batteries.

In EVs, no rollout of new battery tech is a sure thing until it has passed automakers’ extensive internal testing. Even then there can be problems, like when GM had to recall tens of thousands of Chevy Bolts on account of the risk of fires in their battery packs.

This means all of the timetables battery makers have proposed can—and do—slip. Even so, the next five to 10 years should see a steady drumbeat of new battery technologies that yield performance gains beyond the incremental improvements we’ve seen over the past couple of decades. That’s likely to have profound implications both for adoption of EVs, and for which EV makers win and lose.

WSJ : U.S. Steel Shareholders Approve Sale to Japan’s Nippon Steel

U.S. Steel Shareholders Approve Sale to Japan’s Nippon Steel
The $14.1 billion deal still faces regulatory reviews, opposition from United Steelworkers union, members of Congress

United States Steel shareholders approved the sale of the storied company to Japan’s Nippon Steel 5401 -0.36%decrease; red down pointing triangle, in the midst of union opposition and ongoing regulatory reviews that are raising doubts about the $14.1 billion deal.

U.S. Steel shareholders’ X -2.13%decrease; red down pointing triangle approval of the deal was widely expected. Investors are in line to receive $55 in cash for each of their U.S. Steel shares—more than double U.S. Steel’s stock price last August when the company disclosed that it was considering offers.

U.S. Steel said that investors representing 71% of the company’s shares voted on the deal, and of the shares voted, 98% supported the sale. Roughly 29% of shares weren’t voted.

“The overwhelming support from our stockholders is a clear endorsement that they recognize the compelling rationale for our transaction,” said David Burritt, U.S. Steel’s chief executive.

Takahiro Mori, Nippon Steel’s vice chairman who negotiated the deal, said Friday’s vote was a significant step toward completing the acquisition. “From the outset, our goal has been clear—to protect and grow U.S. Steel in the U.S. market,” he said.

U.S. Steel’s stock has been trading well below the purchase price, reflecting investors’ anxiety about the remaining hurdles for the deal to close. The shares declined 2.1% Friday to close at $41.33.

The Pittsburgh-based company selected Nippon Steel over a lower cash and stock offer from U.S. Steel’s main domestic rival, Cleveland-Cliffs. The Tokyo-based company is the world’s fourth-largest steelmaker and has pledged to use its deep pockets and production technology honed at its Japanese mills to upgrade U.S. Steel’s aging plants.

Nippon Steel has told the United Steelworkers union it is willing to invest $1.4 billion to improve equipment at U.S. Steel’s older plants, some of which have operated for more than a century. But Nippon Steel’s promises so far have done little to alleviate opposition that flared immediately after the companies announced their deal in December.

The union, which represents about 10,000 hourly U.S. Steel hourly workers, has said it doubts that Nippon Steel is committed to maintaining U.S. Steel’s contract with the union and dismissed the company’s pledges to refrain from layoffs and plant closings as meaningless gestures.

The union said Friday that U.S. Steel executives and shareholders voting for the deal gave priority to their own financial gains over the company’s employees and retirees. “Thankfully, the vote isn’t the end of the story: The decision ultimately isn’t simply up to shareholders and executives,” the union said.

President Biden has said he is opposed to foreign-ownership of U.S. Steel, but hasn’t said explicitly that he would block the deal. Democratic and Republican lawmakers have called for the deal to be blocked, arguing that allowing a foreign-owned company—even from a close U.S. ally in Japan—could undermine U.S. national security if steel is needed for defense purposes.

“If you do reach a true national security emergency, we have substantially less leverage over a Japanese firm than an American firm,” Ohio Republican Sen. J.D. Vance said in an interview this week.

U.S. Steel has said it doesn’t produce steel for military equipment. Most of the company’s sales come from supplying sheet steel to the auto, appliance and construction industries.

The Justice Department is reviewing the merger for market-concentration concerns. Nippon Steel operates a handful of businesses in the U.S. that process steel or produce finished goods with steel. The department recently asked for more information on Nippon Steel’s partnership with steelmaking giant ArcelorMittal in an Alabama steel mill, according to people familiar with the matter. That mill supplies steel to some of the same industries as U.S. Steel.

U.S. Steel considered Nippon Steel’s lack of steel production plants in the U.S. as an advantage over other companies’ bids for the company, including Cleveland-Cliffs, which U.S. Steel’s lawyers warned would likely face a difficult antitrust review. Cleveland-Cliffs and U.S. Steel are the only domestic suppliers of iron ore used to make steel and the dominant producers of automotive steel and steel used in electric-vehicle motors.

The Nippon Steel deal is also under a national-security review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. The Treasury Department-led committee of government agencies is expected to take months to complete an investigation of potential national security aspects of the deal.

The committee can recommend that the president block a deal, but it usually prescribes remedies to address potential national-security risks.

The 123-year-old U.S. Steel is one of the oldest continually operated public companies in the U.S. This year’s presidential election has heightened interest in the deal as Biden and former President Donald Trump jostle for votes from steelworkers and other blue-collar workers in battleground states with large manufacturing workforces. The United Steelworkers union last month endorsed Biden for re-election shortly after he came out against the deal.

The White House has framed Biden’s opposition to the deal as mostly about supporting U.S. Steel workers. Biden said Wednesday during remarks with Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida at the White House that he is committed to American workers, and said he is committed to America’s alliance with Japan.

Kishida, speaking at the same event, reminded the U.S. to adhere to procedures based on law in evaluating the deal. Kishida said that Japanese businesses in the U.S. already employ nearly 1 million people.

“Investment from Japan to the U.S. can only increase upwards in the months and years to come,” he said.

Opponents of the deal have questioned whether Nippon Steel’s business interests in Japan will compromise its management of U.S. Steel. The steelworkers union this week lambasted Nippon Steel for asking the International Trade Commission to lift long-lasting U.S. tariffs on tin-plate from Japan.

Cleveland-Cliffs and U.S. Steel, the only steelmakers in the U.S. that produce the tin-coated steel used in food cans and jar lids, have laid off hundreds of workers and idled tin-plate production in recent years. Cleveland-Cliffs attributed its February decision to close its Weirton, W.Va., tin-plate mill this month to lower-cost imports.

“We are now seeing further evidence that Nippon Steel will continue to prioritize its Japanese operations at the expense of U.S. workers,” the union said. “Nippon must not be allowed to acquire U.S. Steel facilities.”

Nippon had no immediate comment.

WSJ : Salesforce in Advanced Talks to Buy Informatica

Salesforce in Advanced Talks to Buy Informatica
Deal for data-management software firm would be among Salesforce’s largest if completed

Salesforce CRM -1.61%decrease; red down pointing triangle is in advanced talks to acquire data-management software provider Informatica INFA -0.85%decrease; red down pointing triangle, according to people familiar with the matter.

Redwood City, Calif.-based Informatica has a market capitalization of more than $11 billion after a 43% run-up in its shares this year as traders bet on a deal.

One potential complicating factor: The price that was being discussed is below Informatica’s Friday closing stock price of $38.48 as a result of the recent jump.

San Francisco-based Salesforce specializes in cloud-based software that helps sales staff manage customer relationships.

Informatica helps companies manage their data across cloud and on-premise systems, allowing organizations to better analyze the data they collect. It counts companies ranging from Unilever to Toyota and Deloitte as customers, according to its website.

Informatica has recently launched new tools building on its artificial-intelligence capabilities as an AI craze sweeps across the tech industry. Last year it debuted Claire GPT, a generative AI tool to help companies handle data.

Salesforce has historically had a voracious appetite for deals, having made over 70 acquisitions since 2006, according to data from FactSet.

A deal for Informatica would rank among Salesforce’s largest and be its biggest since it closed the roughly $28 billion acquisition of workplace-collaboration products company Slack Technologies in 2021. Slack was Salesforce’s biggest acquisition ever. A few years prior, Salesforce agreed to buy data-analytics platform Tableau Software for more than $15 billion.

Salesforce’s approach to dealmaking drew a swarm of at least five activist investors last year including Elliott Investment Management and Starboard Value.

To appease the activists, Salesforce said that it disbanded a committee focused on M&A, as it turned its focus toward improving profitability and operations. It also named ValueAct Capital Chief Executive Mason Morfit to its board along with two other new members.

Elliott had been gearing up for a proxy battle but backed down after Salesforce unveiled cost cuts and bigger share buybacks, among other measures.

That and the prospect of AI enhancing its product offerings has helped Salesforce stock rebound sharply since late 2022. It has notched a further increase of roughly 15% so far this year, bringing Salesforce’s market capitalization to roughly $285 billion.

Marc Benioff once again became the company’s sole CEO in early 2023, after Bret Taylor vacated his co-CEO position. Taylor had earlier shared the top role with Benioff for about a year.

Benioff has been grappling with how to curb the business’ deceleration after a pandemic-fueled boom in 2021. In February, Salesforce guided toward lower-than-expected revenue growth this year, in part because of a weakness in professional services.

Private-equity firm Permira and the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board in 2015 took Informatica private in a transaction valued at $5.3 billion after roughly 15 years as a public company. The business went public again in 2021.

>>> US Close Dow -1.24% S&P -1.46% Nasdaq -1.62% Russell -1.93%

Closing Stock Market Summary
The stock market finished the week with solid losses. The Dow Jones Industrial Average logged a 1.2% decline, the S&P 500 fell 1.5%, the Nasdaq Composite slid 1.6%, and the Russell 2000 closed with a 1.9% loss.

Heightened geopolitical uncertainty in front of a weekend contributed to today's sell-off. Concerns were related to reports that Iran could soon attack Israel, which also sent oil prices higher ($85.58/bbl, +0.58, +0.7%) due to worries about supply disruptions.

Treasuries also settled with solid gains today in response to the geopolitical angst, but still registered declines on the week as participants recalibrated rate cut expectations. The 2-yr note yield fell nine basis points today, and jumped 15 this week, to 4.88%. The 10-yr note yield declined eight basis points today, and climbed 12 this week, to 4.50%.

Another sticking point for investors today was global growth concerns after China reported weaker-than-expected exports (-7.5% yr/yr) and imports (-1.9% yr/yr) for March.

Just about everything participated in the broad retreat. The equal-weighted S&P 500 declined 1.6%. Weakness in the semiconductor space had an outsized impact on index losses, though, following news that Chinese telecom companies have been ordered to replace U.S.-made processors in their equipment by 2027. The PHLX Semiconductor Index (SOX) slid 3.3%.

All 11 S&P 500 sectors registered declines ranging from 0.7% (utilities) to 1.8% (materials).

The Q1 earnings reporting period started on a weak note today after JPMorgan Chase (JPM 182.79, -12.64, -6.5%) CEO Jamie Dimon made some cautious-sounding macro comments and the bank left its net interest income guidance for 2024 unchanged from its prior view.

Citigroup (C 59.68, -1.03, -1.7%) and Wells Fargo (WFC 56.47, -0.22, -0.4%) also logged declines after their earnings results.
  • Nasdaq Composite: +7.4% YTD
  • S&P 500:+7.8% YTD
  • S&P Midcap 400: +4.3% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: +0.8% YTD
  • Russell 2000: -1.2% YTD

Reviewing today's economic data:
  • March Import Prices 0.4% --- prior 0.3%
  • March Import Prices ex-oil 0.1% ---- prior 0.2%
  • March Export Prices 0.3% --- prior revised to 0.7% from 0.8%
  • March Export Prices Ex-Ag 0.4% --- prior revised to 0.6% from 0.8%
  • The preliminary April University of Michigan Index of Consumer Sentiment checked in at 77.9 (consensus 78.8) versus the final reading of 79.4 for March. In the same period a year ago, the index stood at 63.7.
    • The key takeaway from the report is the uptick in inflation expectations, which follows form with the larger-than-expected increase in the March Consumer Price Index and the view from various Fed officials that stickier inflation readings mean the Fed can be patient before cutting rates.

Looking ahead, Monday's economic calendar features: March Retail Sales (prior 0.6%) and Retail Sales ex-auto (prior 0.3%) at 8:30 ET; February Business Inventories (prior 0.0%) and April NAHB Housing Market Index (prior 51) at 10:00 ET.

FT : BlackRock assets under management hit record $10.5tn

BlackRock assets under management hit record $10.5tn
Net income rises 36% in first quarter

Roaring equity markets and the popularity of a new spot bitcoin exchange traded fund powered BlackRock to record assets under management of $10.5tn and net income that rose by more than one-third.

The world’s largest money manager reported a 36 per cent year-on-year jump in net income to $1.57bn in its fiscal first quarter, on an 11 per increase in revenue to $4.7bn. Those figures, as well as adjusted net income of $1.47bn, all beat the expectations of analysts polled by Bloomberg.

However, net inflows of $57bn disappointed, dragged down by $19bn of outflows from cash management products.

Chief executive Larry Fink pointed in a statement on Friday to a “strong pipeline” of opportunities. “We see significant growth potential in infrastructure, technology, retirement and whole portfolio solutions,” he said.

BlackRock was one of a dozen providers to launch a spot bitcoin exchange traded fund in the first quarter but its product has been the runaway success story: it reached $10bn in assets in record time and now has $18.7bn. That helped power total flows into ETFs in the quarter to $67bn.

Most of the $1.4tn year-on-year increase in assets under management was due to rising equity markets. In the US, the S&P 500 had its best first quarter since 2019. Fixed income funds reported inflows of $42bn and equity funds received $18bn.

“What people are going to focus on is their ability to gather assets. It’s a mixed bag,” said Kyle Saunders, analyst at Edward Jones.

BlackRock and other asset managers have been predicting a big rotation into fixed income, but the US Federal Reserve’s decision to keep interest rates at a 23-year high has thus far depressed demand.

Technology revenues, which investors like because they are somewhat less tied to market gyrations, were up $37bn year on year to $377bn.

BlackRock’s operating margin improved to 35.8 per cent, slightly better than analysts expected. The money manager announced small job cuts in January as part of a broader effort to control costs.

BlackRock shares were up about 2.6 per cent in pre-market trading on Friday. The company’s stock price is down slightly in 2024, after a strong fourth quarter during which time it rose more than 25 per cent.