WSJ : Biden Administration Drops Plan to Ban Menthol Cigarettes

Biden Administration Drops Plan to Ban Menthol Cigarettes
White House had been weighing health benefit of ban against angering Black voters

The Biden administration is reversing course on its plan to ban menthol cigarettes, after the White House weighed the potential public-health benefits of banning minty smokes against the political risk of angering Black voters in an election year.

The administration is expected to announce on Friday that it is delaying a decision on whether to impose a ban, contending that it needs more time to consult with outside groups on the matter, according to people familiar with the matter. There is no timeline for the administration to revisit the decision as President Biden competes with former President Trump for votes in November.

Menthols account for more than a third of all cigarettes sold in the U.S. each year and are predominantly used by Black and Hispanic smokers. Some 81% of Black smokers used menthols in 2020, compared with 30% of white smokers and 51% of Hispanic smokers, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

The Biden administration in 2021 began pursuing a ban on menthol cigarettes, saying the policy move would reduce youth initiation, increase the success rate for smokers trying to quit and address health disparities among people of color. The plan was part of the administration’s Cancer Moonshot initiative to reduce the death rate from cancer.

The Food and Drug Administration had been expected to adopt a new rule banning menthols last year, but the plan was delayed as the White House mulled its political repercussions.

Some Black community leaders had fought the measure, saying a ban would expand the illicit market for cigarettes and lead police to racially profile Black smokers. The American Civil Liberties Union and some members of the Congressional Black Caucus expressed similar concerns.

The two largest U.S. cigarette makers, Altria Group MO -0.40%decrease; red down pointing triangle and Reynolds American, disputed the FDA’s conclusions on the health effects of menthols and argued that a ban would have unintended consequences.

Reynolds makes Newport, the leading U.S. menthol-cigarette brand, and funded opposition efforts by Black leaders. British American Tobacco BATS -0.47%decrease; red down pointing triangle in 2017 spent about $50 billion to take full control of Reynolds American.

For decades, cigarette companies marketed menthol brands such as Newport, Kool and Salem to Black people, distributing free packs in Black neighborhoods and running magazine and billboard ads depicting Black smokers. The companies also encouraged the belief that menthols had a medicinal effect.

A study from the University of Waterloo in Canada, which evaluated bans on menthol cigarettes in Canada and the European Union, projected that a U.S. ban on menthol cigarettes would prompt 1.3 million smokers to quit, including more than 380,000 Black smokers, in the first four to 23 months after the ban went into effect.

California and Massachusetts have implemented their own bans on menthol cigarettes, as have more than 100 municipalities across the U.S. The EU imposed a similar ban in 2020.

FT : Anglo American set to be bought or broken up after rejecting £31bn BHP offe

Anglo American set to be bought or broken up after rejecting £31bn BHP offer, investors believe
UK-listed company says Australian miner’s takeover approach ‘significantly undervalues’ it

Investors believe mining company Anglo American is set to be bought or broken up even after the 107-year-old London-listed group rejected a £31bn hostile takeover approach from Australian rival BHP.

Anglo on Friday said BHP’s indicative all-stock offer “significantly undervalues” the company and would be “highly unattractive” to its shareholders.

But investors including activist hedge fund Elliott Management are circling and Anglo chief executive Duncan Wanblad now faces a fight to keep the FTSE 100 company intact.

“I cannot see Anglo existing as an independent company by the end of the year in its current form,” said one top-10 Anglo shareholder.

The company’s position has been further complicated by US-based Elliott building up a $1bn stake using derivatives, roughly equivalent to 2.5 per cent of the company’s shares, according to regulatory filings.

Analysts and investors have predicted Anglo’s rejection of the offer will encourage competitors such as Glencore and Rio Tinto to table rival bids and BHP to improve its price. BHP has until May 22 to make a formal approach under UK takeover rules.

The move on Anglo represents the latest attempt by Melbourne-based BHP — known colloquially as “The Big Australian” in its home market — to reshape the global mining industry.

Under Mike Henry, the company veteran who was appointed chief executive four years ago, BHP has refocused its business on what it calls “future-facing” minerals, including copper and potash, while disposing of its oil and gas exploration assets.

The current all-stock approach excludes Anglo’s platinum and iron ore businesses in South Africa, which are independently listed in Johannesburg. BHP said, if successful, it would review Anglo’s other assets such as De Beers diamonds and manganese operations in South Africa.

South Africa’s ruling African National Congress, which is preparing for general elections in May, reacted with anger to the proposed break-up of one its most-storied companies.

Recommended

News in-depthAnglo American PLC
Why South Africa is Anglo American’s ‘poison pill’

“If [companies] don’t want South African assets, then they don’t want Anglo,” Gwede Mantashe, the country’s mining minister, told the Financial Times on Friday. “Anglo is a South African industry. Anglo isn’t a foreign entity. It was born and grew here, out of our cheap labour . . . so you can’t want Anglo and not want South Africa.”

Some large Anglo shareholders said this week they expected BHP to make a higher offer. As a result, BHP’s shares closed 4.6 per cent lower on Friday amid investor concerns about the company overpaying. The decline lowers the valuation of the bid from £31bn to under £30bn.

BHP declined to comment on Anglo’s rejection of its proposal.

Anglo’s share price rose a further 3.5 per cent on Friday on the news of the Elliott stake. They are up more than a fifth this week.

Haaretz : Explained: Why Is This Week in the Israel-Gaza Campus Wars Different F

Explained: Why Is This Week in the Israel-Gaza Campus Wars Different From All Other Weeks?
Columbia University President Minouche Shafik was supposed to speak at the December congressional hearing that proved disastrous for the presidents of Harvard and Penn. By a stroke of luck, she was out of town. In retrospect, U.S. campuses might be looking different today had she made herself available

NEW YORK – Israel has withdrawn most of its troops from Gaza, and a steady stream of humanitarian aid is finally making its way into the devastated Strip.

With the worst of the fighting between Israel and Hamas behind us, why now, of all times, are the tensions sparked by the war suddenly spinning out of control on campuses across America?

It turns out that an event in Washington that wasn't even supposed to take place at this time has ignited some of the biggest student protests around the country since the Vietnam War.

  • Jewish students are no longer safe at Columbia University
  • Nazis and Zionists: The Columbia protests according to two tribes and two algorithms
  • Columbia University's president is the latest scapegoat in America's antisemitism wars

What triggered it all?

The event that set everything in motion was an April 17 congressional hearing on rising incidents of antisemitism at Columbia. Nemat Minouche Shafik, the university's president, had originally been invited to attend the hearing held by the House committee on higher education in December, along with three of her colleagues – the presidents of Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania and MIT. She notified the committee that she would be out of the country then, and her hearing date was rescheduled for April 17.

So Shafik had four months to learn from the mistakes of her colleagues – two of whom lost their jobs because of their disastrous testimony. Flanked by the co-chairs of Columbia's Board of Trustees and the co-director of the university's task force on antisemitism, Shafik came prepared with many of the answers the Republican-controlled committee wanted to hear. She acknowledged that Columbia hadn't done a good enough job cracking down on antisemitism and promised to do better.

To prevent their president from stealing the limelight from their struggle, pro-Palestinian student groups on campus sprang into action a few hours before Shafik boarded her flight to the capital. They pitched dozens of tents on Columbia's east lawn without obtaining the necessary permits. They called it the "Gaza Solidarity Encampment." And even when, several times throughout the day, they were ordered to leave or face disciplinary action, they stayed put.

After returning to New York the following day, Shafik saw an opportunity to show the congressional committee she meant business. She asked the New York Police Department for help in evicting the students. More than 100 were suspended and taken into custody in this extraordinary crackdown. If Shafik had hoped that photos and footage of students being herded into police trucks, their hands zip-tied behind them, would extinguish the rebellion, it accomplished the exact opposite.

Within hours, hundreds of students had occupied the west lawn, just across the walkway. Within days, they had pitched their tents again. Since early last week, Columbia has been restricting access to its main campus in Morningside Heights to university ID holders. Following the arrests, hundreds of anti-Israel activists have been gathering on the sidewalk of Broadway just outside the locked campus gates holding their own loud protests, sometimes in coordination with the students camping out inside.

Drawing inspiration from Columbia, pro-Palestinian student groups across the country have been setting up their own encampments in solidarity with Gaza, in defiance of university rules. In recent days, the movement has gone international, with tent cities cropping up at universities as far away as Australia.

As the protests have swept across the country, the crackdown has intensified. On Thursday, police reportedly used tear gas to fend off protesters at Emory University in Atlanta. On Wednesday, state troopers were called in to restrain protesters at the University of Texas at Austin.

On Thursday, the University of Southern California announced that it was closing its campus until further notice, and that the main graduation ceremony would be canceled this year, after nearly 100 students were arrested following clashes with campus police and the LAPD. At New York University, the administration set up a plywood wall to block a main campus plaza, after several protesters were arrested there this week, and at Harvard, the main Palestinian student group was expelled.

Where do things stand at Columbia right now?

The campus is bracing for another possible showdown between the administration and the protesters Friday. After the demonstrators repeatedly ignored orders to dismantle the new encampment, Shafik announced at 10 P.M. Tuesday that she would give them two hours to disperse or face consequences. Rumors began to spread that she intended to call in the National Guard this time. Hundreds of students headed out to the campus in the middle of night, bracing for a possible historic event.

At about 3 A.M., the administration extended its deadline to 8 A.M. Just as time was running out, a breakthrough was reported in negotiations between student leaders and the administration, and the ultimatum was extended for another 48 hours. According to the administration, the protesters had agreed to take down their tents, among other concessions.

The protesters, meanwhile, say they have no intention of packing up until the university meets their demands to divest from Israel and grant amnesty to all students and faculty members who were suspended or fired for participating in the protests.

Shafik is in a tough position. Bringing in the National Guard or the NYPD would likely add further fuel to the flames. It might also cost the president her job, as many members of the faculty and the university senate are furious that she summoned police to campus last week.

On the other hand, if she allows the anti-Israel protesters – whose rhetoric has sometimes crossed the line into antisemitism – to continue flouting the rules, she will have lost her authority and be seen as breaking her promise to make Columbia a safe place for Jewish students.

The deadline of 8 A.M. Friday has already passed. Columbia has yet to take action to clear the south lawn, as it has threatened. That doesn't mean it won't.

Could there be another reason this is all happening now?

For sure. It is spring, the weather is getting warm, the trees are blooming, and who doesn't want to be outside this time of year? It is not a coincidence that in the bitter cold of December, when the presidents of Harvard, Penn and MIT faced hostile questioning in Congress about antisemitism at their schools, no student protesters were pitching tents on campus and trying to steal the show.

Neither is it a coincidence that the last time police arrested students at Columbia was also in April – April 1968. Springtime is always a great season for protests.

Haaretz : The Israeli Artist Whose Twist on French Masters Is Impressing Paris

The Israeli Artist Whose Twist on French Masters Is Impressing Paris
For her exhibit at the Musée d'Orsay, Nathanaëlle Herbelin's works have been placed next to paintings by revolutionary French Postimpressionists. She tells Haaretz how she takes that legacy forward

Open gallery view
Nathanaëlle Herbelin at her Paris atelier. 'I remember painting on my bed when I was a girl. Painting has always been a therapeutic tool for me.'Credit: Anaïs Boileau


When Nathanaëlle Herbelin studied painting two decades ago, Israel's plastic arts world was thick with conceptual art, and painting was considered a fringe pursuit. Those were the days when Israel's Hamidrasha art school was riding high, and the Israeli style Want of Matter ruled the day. Figurative painters were virtually turned away.

Herbelin was born in Israel to a French father and an Israeli mother, and grew up in the town of Tzoran northeast of Tel Aviv. After the army, she left Israel to study in Paris.

"I remember painting on my bed when I was a girl. Painting has always been a therapeutic tool for me, and I was drawn to realistic painting. I painted Scouts' shirts and was my class' painter, " she says.

Herbelin wasn't accepted to the Thelma Yellin High School of the Arts near Tel Aviv, "which turned out for the best: I think they were looking for teenagers who were more in tune with conceptual art. I found myself painting with former Soviet artists who gave me technical tools that I use to this day. I decided that this was what I wanted to pursue, and I felt that it would be hard to express in Israel."

Herbelin dreamed of attending Paris' École des Beaux-Arts. "Paris is a city of radical conservatism, and that suited me fine," she says. "It was very hard to get accepted to the Beaux-Arts. I lost 10 kilos [22 pounds] studying for the exams. And it worked. I studied there for six years. I went to a prep school and then did five years of studies – and also won a scholarship and studio space."


After graduating, she exhibited her work in galleries in Paris and New York, and in group exhibits in other cities. She was hardly shown in Israel save for a solo exhibit at the Umm al-Fahm Art Gallery and one at the Institut Français in Tel Aviv.

Open gallery view
Nathanaëlle Herbelin, 2022. 'Paris is a city of radical conservatism, and that suited me fine.'Credit: HV-studio / Nathanaëlle herbeli

In recent years, she has been spending most of her time in Paris. Her parents, sister – painter Emmanuelle Herbelin – and brother Yehonatan live in Israel. Yehonatan is author of the novel "I Was There," which takes place in the Gaza Strip.

Two years ago she married her French partner, Jérémie Werner, and the two have a daughter together. About a year ago her Paris studio was visited by Musée d'Orsay curators Christophe Leribault and Nicolas Gausserand, who had stumbled across her paintings at a solo exhibit in an unusual Paris exhibition space in 2022. That exhibit was curated by Philippe Ségalot, who was international head of contemporary art at Christie's

"I saw an abandoned space with a unique atmosphere," Herbelin says. "We decided not to make it a sales exhibit – in this way we broke the commercial aspect. It was like a pop-up exhibit for a few days, presented at the same time as Art Basel. People actually stood in line to see it."

'Paris' power is that I know painters and friends from all over – Italian, Chinese, Georgians, Iranians, Jews and Muslims – and it's all very enriching.'
Herbelin was nine months pregnant when Leribault and Gausserand visited her studio; they offered her a solo exhibit. She was surprised and flattered. The Musée d'Orsay is one of the city's three leading museums, after the Louvre and the Pompidou Center. The d'Orsay, a bastion of Impressionism, shows very little contemporary art. Her work is being shown there until June 30.

"I told them, 'Well done: You're either very progressive guys or you have no idea how busy with the baby I'm going to be,'" Herbelin says.

She kept working on the exhibit even after October 7. "The people at the d'Orsay were very respecting and sensitive; I felt a lot of support with the difficulties I went through," she says. "They didn't see a connection with my exhibition, which was in the works a long time before that as a dialogue between 19th-century painters and the current reality in the Middle East.

Open gallery view
Painter Nathanaëlle Herbelin at her atelier in Paris.Credit: Anas Boileau
"I think my name doesn't automatically brand me as Israeli or Jewish. I mean, I don't hide it; people know I'm Israeli. It's mentioned in the exhibit's text, but my paintings are universal and inviting. So far, nobody has asked me about Israel. It doesn't come up as a subject in conversations. But it may happen."


Grandma's ghost

Herbelin agrees that the subject of antisemitism remains complicated; it's hard to distinguish criticism of Israel from antisemitism.

"It comes in waves, and I think it will pass this time too," she says. "Criticism of Israel and Jews has a flip side. French people also think that Jews are smart and good, and Jews are very involved in cultural affairs. The Jewish community here is large and powerful."


Either way, Herbelin's private life is filled with people from different cultures. "Paris' power is that I know painters and friends from all over – Italian, Chinese, Georgians, Iranians, Jews and Muslims – and it's all very enriching. I've become friends with several Muslims," she says.

"One of them, Ahmed, lives in the 18th arrondissement and earns a living as a sawyer. I came over to have a few things fixed, and he always struck me as melancholy. He emigrated from Egypt and couldn't leave Paris for his father's funeral because he has no residency permit. I donated a painting for him to sell and also painted him once. I mostly paint universal and personal themes, but sometimes I touch on political or social themes."

Open gallery view
From the exhibit at the Musée d'Orsay.Credit: Objets Pointus
At the opening of her exhibit, Herbelin said that during her first decade in Paris, before she met Werner, her only family in France was her grandmother, who died two months before she and her future husband met. Once a week she would ride to the suburbs to visit her grandmother and wash her clothes.

"Now, three years after she passed away, I'm a young mother and, God knows, I devote 20 percent of my time to doing the laundry. And when I shrink almost all of my love Jérémie's pants, I think of her."

Herbelin adds that her grandmother kept all of her "worst paintings."

'I was painting a bar manager named Augustin, a good friend of mine who fell asleep while I was painting. He was a pretty bad model.'
"When she died, I had to take back a hundred paintings to the studio, and now I'm improving them, adding layers," she says. "It's like living with ghosts. Painting on the paintings I brought over from her place keeps reminding me of her."

When she was young, Herbelin wandered among the works of Degas, Monet, Manet, Courbet and Camille Corot at the Musée d'Orsay. In her current exhibition, the curators have placed her work among paintings by the artists of the Nabis movement, a revolutionary Postimpressionist group founded in 1888 and 1889 at the Académie Julian in Paris. The artists of that stream whose work appears with Herbelin's include Pierre Bonnard, Édouard Vuillard and Félix Vallotton. (The name Nabis derives from the Hebrew word for "prophet.")

Open gallery view
La chambre sacrée des érythréens, 2020, Nathanaëlle Herbelin.Credit: Nicolas Lafon / Nathanaëlle Herbelin
In the accompanying text, the curators write that Herbelin's art provides a sense of continuity to the history of painting. As they put it, the paintings present a new dynamic of relationships, a preoccupation with women's body hair, female pleasure and a contemporary female gaze that responds directly to the male gaze of the 19th century. The palette, motifs and delicate touch are reminiscent of Bonnard, Vuillard and Vallotton.

The exhibit's catalog is a modest affair; Herbelin wrote part of it, with the rest by the curators and sometimes even the models. Some of the work on display is pretty big, and some tiny. The smallest pieces are sketches that the artist did for herself, though many of them are of very high quality. She examined subjects before switching to a large format.

What things interest you most in painting?

"Personal subjects that everybody can identify with, both domestic scenes and interpersonal relations. It's hard for me to paint about political or social subjects that I haven't experienced myself.

"For example, I was painting a bar manager named Augustin, a good friend of mine who fell asleep while I was painting. He was a pretty bad model, but in the end a painting emerged that depicted a French guy who could be any other young man around the world, dozing on a green couch with his spotted shirt and an ashtray."

Open gallery view
From the exhibit at the Musée d'Orsay, Paris.Credit: Objets Pointus
Open gallery view
Jérémie au bain, 2023, by Nathanaëlle Herbelin.Credit: Thomas Merle
Exposed and natural

Regarding the juxtaposition with the Nabis, there's Herbelin's painting of a woman who seems to be examining the hairs of her bikini line with her chest exposed. Alongside it is a 1918 painting by Bonnard of a young woman washing her body in a basin. The use of color is somewhat similar, but the time and story are different. In this pairing, Herbelin and the curators illustrate the change in painting over 100 years.

There are also paintings in which Herbelin is the model; sometimes even in the nude. For her 2022 work "Être ici est une splendeur," she couldn't find a suitable model, so she gave it a go herself. She started with one of those small sketches and switched to the large format as seen in the exhibition.

In the catalog she explains that while working on the painting she read a book by German artist Paula Modersohn-Becker, who in 1906 was the first woman to do a nude self-portrait. Herbelin writes: The fact that Becker portrayed herself in the nude while pregnant piqued Herbelin's curiosity; Becker wasn't actually pregnant at the time.

About a year and a half later, Becker really did become pregnant – and continued to portray herself. When she gave birth in November 1907, she planned to retire and focus on her family, but she died suddenly about three weeks later – apparently a complication from the birth.

"I decided to portray myself as if I were pregnant, as a kind of tribute to Paula, a tribute that also expressed my desire to have a child," Herbelin says. "And then two months after the painting was created, I became pregnant too."

She's particularly interested in partnerships and family. The exhibition includes a painting of a couple, Madeleine and Clément, embracing on a bed and barely dressed. "To me they looked like an inspiring couple," Herbelin says. "When I painted them I also wanted to be in such a relationship; it was before I met Jérémie."

Open gallery view
Michel, Emmanuel, Berhe and Zina, Levanda 1, 2020, by Nathanaëlle Herbelin.Credit: Nicolas Degrave / Tajan / Nathanaëlle Herbelin
In one painting Werner is seen in a bathtub totally nude. "He's exposed and natural, just as for hundreds of years it seemed natural to us to see nude women in paintings," Herbelin says. "People who look at the painting are surprised that he agreed to be a nude model, but if he were a woman nobody would consider it unusual."

In another painting, her daughter Elisha is lying on her and nursing. Herbelin writes that when Elisha was born she knew things that her mother apparently has forgotten. She took her mother's breast in her tiny mouth and seemed to glue herself to her. Weaning is difficult and she's still nursing. Nursing is a primitive, crude phenomenon, so Herbelin is so happy to be able to do something so archaic.

To what extent is your Israeliness reflected in the paintings?

"Now I'm painting things related to the war. I'm also painting Israeli scenes; for example, I'm drawn to fruit-and-vegetable stands. I always have pictures of rabbis there in the background, behind the fruits and vegetables. It's a very Israeli landscape.

Open gallery view
Cecilia, 2021, Nathanaëlle Herbelin.Credit: Objets pointus / Nathanaëlle Herbelin / Galerie Jousse Entreprise
"During the coronavirus I was living in Tel Aviv's Neveh Sha'anan neighborhood and I painted a group of Eritreans [asylum seekers] on Levanda Street. They lived four to a small room. This painting is considered exotic in Europe, but I didn't want to show it in Paris. I donated it to the Tel Aviv Museum of Art."

Why not show Israeli things in Paris?

"I fight identity politics in the art world. I don't want to give the Europeans the gift they want so much. They expect political art from me, but I feel that that's a discussion that has to take place in Israel. When I painted children after October 7 – children from Israel and children from Gaza – I didn't want to show them here in Paris."

Herbelin says that in Israel too she sometimes feels like a prisoner when she's expected to touch on subjects she's not always keen to tackle. "There's a lot of death and suffering and complexity in Israel, and that sometimes enters the painting even if I'm not living in Israel. But I want people to let me breathe," she says.

Did you think about trying something from contemporary art such as installations, presentations or video art?

"It's good that there's contemporary art and new techniques. That means that the world is progressing. Painting is something much more ancient. It's from the era of caves. The art that you're referring to has no connection to painting. It's fine that there's contemporary art, and I like to go to art exhibitions like that, but it's the way I like to go to the movies."

Open gallery view
From the exhibition at the Musée d'Orsay. Left: Pierre Bonnard, Nu accroupi au tub, 1918. Right: Nathanaëlle Herbelin, 2023 ,Pince a'e'piler, version 2.Credit: Sophie Crepy
Do you feel that you're living in the wrong era?

"On the contrary, I feel as if I'm an emissary of painting in the current era. That's why I'm also so interested in the history of painting. And like every painter today, I'm carrying the torch of painting and feel that I'm contributing something to it."

There's the notion that when people wander around a museum somewhere around the world, they often feel that what's interesting is the artist's biographical background rather than the work itself. Are you familiar with that?

"Totally – the feeling that the story is more important than the work of art. It's good that they're including more unknown artists, but sometimes I wander around museums and feel that the audience has to tolerate inferior art only because the museum's directors have embraced affirmative action."

Do you feel that you have a defined style?

"I prefer to change. In general I prefer to paint from observation rather than from photos; the painting emerges much more alive that way. That's why I invite people to the studio and replace objects. The human and physical changes in the studio are always exciting.

"In a painting from a photo there's less adrenalin, it's less exciting and more technical. There were subjects I was forced to paint from a photo because that was the only way possible, but today in such cases I manage to distance myself enough from the photo to enter an imaginary world and play around so that it becomes interesting."

This question might be a bit annoying, but if people have been painting for thousands of years, what does your painting contribute to the world? In what way are you different from thousands of artists who showed people in situations quite similar to yours?

"It's like with poetry, for example. There have been many great poets, but people still write poems. I make art because I have a need to do so, because I can't do anything else.

"Look how many people go to painting classes at every age – the way people go to writing workshops. It's important to me to convey emotion in my paintings. At the exhibition I see people crying.

"It's important to me to create art that isn't condescending. It's important to bring people back to museums, to give them faith in a museum. Let them have a moment of beauty. The world is tough, after all."