WSJ : China Is Winning the Minerals War

China Is Winning the Minerals War
Western efforts to make a dent are languishing; ‘China is not just standing still waiting for us to catch up’

SINGAPORE—For the past few years, the West has been trying to break China’s grip on minerals that are critical for defense and green technologies. Despite their efforts, Chinese companies are becoming more dominant, not less.

They are expanding operations, supercharging supply and causing prices to drop. Their challengers can’t compete.

“China is not just standing still waiting for us to catch up,” said Morgan Bazilian, director of the Payne Institute at the Colorado School of Mines. “They are making investments on top of their already massive investments in all aspects of the critical-minerals supply chain.”

Take nickel, which is needed for electric-vehicle batteries. Chinese processing plants that dot the Indonesian archipelago are pumping out vast quantities of the mineral from new and expanding facilities, jolting the market.

Meanwhile, Switzerland-based mining giant Glencore is suspending operations at its nickel plant in New Caledonia, a French territory, concluding it can’t survive despite offers of financial help from Paris. The U.K.’s Horizonte Minerals, whose new Brazilian mine was expected to become a major Western source, said last month that investors had bailed, citing oversupply in the market.

At least four nickel mines in Western Australia are winding down.

Lithium projects in the U.S. and Australia have been postponed or suspended after a surge in Chinese production at home and in sub-Saharan Africa.

The only dedicated cobalt mine in the U.S. also suspended operations last year, five months after local dignitaries attended its opening ceremony. Its owners say they are struggling against a flood of Chinese-produced cobalt from Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Last year, non-Chinese production of refined cobalt declined to its lowest level in 15 years, according to Darton Commodities. The share of lithium mining done within China or by Chinese companies abroad has grown from 14% in 2018 to 35% this year, according to Fastmarkets, a commodities information provider. Over the same time, lithium processing done within China has risen from 63% in 2018 to 70%, according to Fastmarkets.

The breakneck expansion has assailed Western producers, who say China’s domestic economy can’t always absorb the flood of minerals its firms bring to market. Slower-than-expected electric-car sales growth in China last year meant there were fewer takers for China’s mineral surge, contributing to the crash in global prices.

What’s more worrying for Western producers is that there is little sign of a letup.

“It’s just the way China does things. They have tended to build more capacity whether it’s in aluminum, or cement, or nickel,” said William Adams, head of base metals research for Fastmarkets. Chinese companies “all gun for market share, and the consequence for that is you get oversupply.”

Western officials, too, are sounding the alarm. In response to a question last month about China’s dominance in nickel, Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said the market had been flooded, making businesses in free-market democracies uneconomic.

“It is our belief that that behavior can be intentional, can be happening with the purpose of driving companies in our country, in those of our allies, out of business,” she said. Freeland didn’t provide further details or any evidence for the claim.

China’s Foreign Ministry didn’t respond to a request for comment.

‘The big bad wolf’
Chinese companies are continuing to ramp up, thanks to years of aggressive acquisitions. Zijin Mining, a Chinese state-backed company, said it would increase lithium production by around 85 times this year from a low base, and by a further five times next year.

The projected growth stems from its 2022 purchase of a Western asset—a premium untapped mine in Argentina—that is scheduled to begin pumping out lithium this year.

The mine was discovered in 2015 when Waldo Perez, an Argentinian-born geologist, took samples at a remote lake 13,000 feet above sea level in the Andes, which turned out to be part of a massive lithium deposit. He formed a Canadian company called Neo Lithium with partners, secured the mineral rights, listed it on the Toronto Stock Exchange and stepped up exploration.

Constantine Karayannopoulos, Neo Lithium’s chairman at the time, said he courted potential suitors—miners and makers of EV batteries alike—from Japan, Germany, the U.S., South Korea and Australia, but there was little interest. With lithium prices rising at the time, he said they were wary of joining the “feeding frenzy” and shelling out a lot of money for the mine in case it turned out to be a bust.

The three best offers the company received were from Chinese companies, including the winning $750 million bid from Zijin, whose largest shareholder is a Chinese state-owned firm.

The sale passed a Canadian government review but perturbed conservative lawmakers in the country and in the U.S.

Karayannopoulos said he was protecting shareholder interests and there was little to be done about “some very far removed non-stakeholders complaining that we shouldn’t be selling this to the big bad wolf.”

“The Chinese were true believers but the Westerners were not,” said Perez, the geologist who discovered the deposit and was Neo Lithium’s chief executive at the time of the sale.

‘Single-member OPEC’
China has many advantages in the race to lock up minerals. Its miners are deep-pocketed and aggressive, making bets in resource-rich countries that Western companies have long viewed as corrupt or unstable, such as Indonesia, Mali, Bolivia and Zimbabwe. State banks provide financing for power plants and industrial parks abroad, paving the way for further private Chinese investment.

China’s rapid industrial development also means its companies have spent decades fine-tuning the art of turning raw ore into metals. They can set up new facilities quickly and cheaply. A paper published in February by the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies pegs the costs of building a lithium refinery outside China as three to four times higher than building one within the country.

In eastern Indonesia, Chinese companies have built a fleet of highly efficient nickel and cobalt plants over the past few years after mastering a technology Western miners long considered glitchy and expensive. The plants run on coal power, some of it new, at a time when the world is looking to phase out dirty energy.

“It’s just a simple, straightforward engineering capability that the Chinese have that has been lost in the rest of the world,” said Jim Lennon, managing director for commodities strategy at Macquarie, an Australian bank. “The Chinese have this overwhelming competitive advantage now that can’t really be addressed.”

Talon Metals is trying to compete. The company, headquartered in Toronto, controls a rich underground nickel reserve in central Minnesota—a mine the White House says is part of its plan for breaking U.S. mineral dependence on China. The Energy Department has earmarked more than $100 million for Talon to build a refinery in North Dakota to process ore from Minnesota and elsewhere in North America.

Tesla agreed to buy the nickel for car batteries.

“U.S. policymakers on both sides of the aisle realize we cannot allow China to become a ‘single-member OPEC’ for critical minerals like nickel,” Sean Werger, Talon’s president, said last month, referring to the oil cartel formed by many of the world’s top producers to coordinate supply.

But some investors have soured on Talon, whose share price on the Toronto Stock Exchange has dropped around two-thirds over the past two years amid a flood of Chinese nickel from Indonesia. Many analysts say projects outside Indonesia will struggle to take off unless nickel prices rise significantly. Talon says its high-quality ore gives it an edge, that it is using innovative technologies to boost revenue, and that there is still demand for U.S.-mined minerals.

Like other Western miners, Talon says it isn’t a fair fight. Chinese nickel companies receive cheap state financing as part of a “strategic imperative to gain control over pricing,” said Todd Malan, Talon’s director of external affairs. “All the Western projects have to meet market-based economic criteria.”

Australia’s Queensland Pacific Metals is developing a nickel-processing plant in Australia to refine imported ore from New Caledonia and sell it to General Motors. But last month Queensland Pacific said it would limit further expenditure on the nickel project and instead focus on drilling for gas, citing low nickel prices and challenging market conditions.

The mineral industry is a national priority for Beijing. Metals and mining investments under its Belt and Road Initiative hit record levels last year, according to a report by Australia’s Griffith Asia Institute. Chinese official lending for minerals projects in developing countries typically offers lower rates than commercial loans, according to AidData, a university research lab at William & Mary in Virginia.

Meanwhile, Western companies struggle to get loans. Amos Hochstein, a top White House energy adviser, said this month that Western banks are reluctant to finance projects in risky mineral-rich countries and that China is often the only player.

U.S. legislation passed in 2022 offers electric-vehicle manufacturers incentives to buy minerals domestically or from countries with whom the U.S. has free-trade agreements. Starting next year, batteries could be disqualified for subsidies if they contain minerals that are mined or processed by Chinese companies.

Last Tuesday the White House announced new tariffs on China, including on critical minerals such as natural graphite that Beijing dominates.

Western miners are hopeful that these provisions will eventually drive demand for their minerals, though some are concerned carmakers could find workarounds. They also hope Chinese companies will dial down production.

“At today’s prices, the economics for new greenfield projects, particularly in the West are not supported,” Kent Masters, chief executive of Albemarle, the largest U.S. lithium producer, said this year. Unless prices rise, Masters has said he doesn’t think there is a “business case” for a complete Western lithium supply chain.

WSJ : A Chinese Phone Maker Did Something Apple Couldn’t: Make an EV

A Chinese Phone Maker Did Something Apple Couldn’t: Make an EV
Xiaomi makes rice cookers, smartphones, lamps and now a car, showing how low the barriers to entry have become in the world of electric vehicles


BEIJING—Xiaomi is a Chinese company known for its rice cookers, robot vacuums, air purifiers and smartphones. Now, it has pulled off what Apple, its longtime rival, couldn’t: Make an electric car and bring it to market.

And it did it in three years.

In its home market, Xiaomi 1810 -2.52%decrease; red down pointing triangle—pronounced SHAU-mee—is cranking out its SU7 sedan to a waiting list of buyers after its launch in late March. Since early April, the Beijing-based company said it had delivered more than 10,000 of the electric vehicles and received nearly 90,000 binding orders.

Priced between $30,000 and $42,000, the company says the SU7 can go up to 500 miles on one charge, undercutting comparable versions of the Tesla Model 3 in China by around $4,000 and outrunning it by around 200 miles per charge.

Xiaomi’s feat illuminates a new reality in the century-old automotive business: The barriers to entry for making a car have shrunk in recent years with the emergence of electric vehicles. And in this new reality, China is speeding way ahead.

As the hardware has become simpler, the focus for what makes an appealing product has shifted decisively to software and features.

“New EVs are more like computers with batteries on wheels,” said Paul Gong, head of China autos research at UBS. “Chinese carmakers are now ahead of almost everyone else along the entire EV supply chain.”

To save on time and costs, the company adopted practices from Tesla and other automakers, mined its own product-development know-how and plugged into China’s fast-moving car supply chain. Years of honing laptops, blenders and petcams helped it develop features tailored to a fickle consumer base, including a detachable panel of physical buttons that magnetically clips on below the 16.1-inch center screen for those who don’t like to control their volume or seat via touch screen.

Consumer-product expertise also helped in the integration smartphone, car and household devices. For example, the phone screen can be mirrored on the touch screen. When the car is in a “going home” mode, once it reaches a set distance from home, smart lights and air conditioners switch on inside the residence.

In April, at China’s biggest annual car show, executives from the world’s largest car brands crowded around the Xiaomi stall. Wang Chuanfu, chief executive of Warren Buffett-backed BYD, China’s biggest EV maker, told Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun that he had initially doubted Xiaomi could pull it off, but said he had been proved wrong. “That’s no small feat. Respect!” he said, according to video footage of the exchange.

Eyeing Tesla
Xiaomi is the world’s third-largest smartphone maker, after Apple and South Korea’s Samsung Electronics. But making cars required a whole new level of complexity, Lei told state broadcaster China Central Television in an April interview—even without having to make the internal combustion engine that has made traditional cars so nettlesome to produce.

Xiaomi brought on some 6,000 people to work on the car project, Lei said. Some were recruited from foreign carmakers such as Porsche and BMW; others were transferred from other departments, said Ma Yingbo, a member of Xiaomi’s marketing team. Among the cars Xiaomi looked to for inspiration was Tesla’s Model 3.

To simplify development and reduce costs, Xiaomi adopted Tesla’s process of “gigacasting,” which employs large-scale, high-pressure aluminum die-casting to create the car’s frame. The process combines hundreds of manufacturing steps into one, saving on components, weight, cost and time.

Xiaomi also had to innovate. The liquid aluminum that gets injected into the die-casting machine has to be a certain variety that can withstand an extraordinary amount of pressure. Xiaomi had to come up with its own material, building an artificial-intelligence program that used a method known as deep learning to simulate how different materials would behave when placed inside the die-cast machine, Ma said.

China speed
Xiaomi joined with Beijing Automotive Group to begin its plant project using the state-owned company’s car-making license. From there, it took Xiaomi half a year to design the plant and an additional 15 months to build it, with the remainder of the three-year road to launch spent dealing with approvals, quality control and standards.

The company only seriously started looking into entering the car sector after the U.S. government blacklisted it in January 2021 for what it said were ties to China’s military, prohibiting Americans from investing in Xiaomi, Lei told CCTV. (In May 2021, Washington agreed to remove the company from the blacklist.)

On the day of the blacklisting announcement, Lei recalled gathering board members for an emergency meeting, worried that Xiaomi could soon lose access to American components and would no longer be able to make smartphones. In short, Lei said, Xiaomi needed to find new ways of making money.

In March 2021, Xiaomi declared its intention to join the ranks of Chinese EV makers and pledged to invest $10 billion over the next decade.

From one model to mass production
Xiaomi’s entry catapulted it into the top 10 EV newcomers in China and intensifies a drawn-out price war in China’s EV market, where more than 100 brands are vying for a slice of the world’s biggest auto market—many of them unprofitable.

Lei expects only five to eight companies to survive and said that Xiaomi is currently selling at a loss. To turn a profit, Xiaomi would have to produce 300,000 to 400,000 of the SU7 each year, he told CCTV.

Xiaomi needs to quickly increase production to meet demand. Customers who ordered the car in late April will have to wait 40 to 50 weeks for delivery.

There have been reports in Chinese-language media of the car being involved in minor crashes and an SU7 breaking down shortly after delivery. The company didn’t respond to requests for comments on those reports.

Last week, the U.S. increased tariffs on Chinese EVs to roughly 100%. Xiaomi has said it would focus on the China market in the next three years. The company didn’t make Lei available for an interview.

Know thy customer
As the hardware for electric vehicles becomes simpler, what increasingly determines success in China is a car’s software and features, executives say.

For that, Xiaomi could rely on its in-house expertise of household products and gadgets. The company is intimately familiar with customers’ lifestyle preferences and tapped those insights for its product development, said Tu Le, who splits his time between China and the U.S. and is the managing director of the industry research firm Sino Auto Insights.

When Lei showed the SU7 to BYD’s Wang, he said that from the start Xiaomi spent a lot of time trying to make the car appealing to female buyers. “We figured out who calls the shots,” said Lei, according to the video footage, explaining that it was usually women who made the final buying decision.

One feature that was particularly popular with female customers, he said, was the car’s sun protection on its glass roof. Xiaomi said that the fortified tinted glass keeps the car cool in the sun and blocks UV rays—a feature appreciated by Chinese women eager to shield their skin from the sun.

The SU7’s dashboard can also plug into Xiaomi’s wider software ecosystem, showing the driver’s Xiaomi phone display and allowing anyone with other Xiaomi devices to control them through the car.

“In that sense, SU7 feels more like another gadget in the Xiaomi world,” said Sino Auto Insights’ Le.

Earlier this year, Apple ended its yearslong push to create its own electric vehicle, daunted by the increasing difficulty the company faced as it spent billions trying to catch or exceed the capabilities of existing carmakers.

Upon learning of Apple’s exit, Lei said he instructed employees to ensure the SU7 would work with Apple’s proprietary CarPlay software, which displays iPhone screens on car dashboards, he told CCTV.

Ma Xiaoyun, a student from the northern Chinese city of Tianjin, said he bought a Xiaomi phone in addition to the car just so he could experience their seamless integration with his household devices, such as his water filter and robot vacuum cleaner.

But what appeals the most to the 21-year-old Ma is the car’s acceleration, advertised as 0 to 62 miles an hour in 2.78 seconds—a pace of acceleration reminiscent of some versions of the Porsche Taycan, which costs at least four times as much as the SU7. “I’m getting a lot for the money,” he said.

WSJ : Li Auto Shares Shed 19% on Weak Earnings, Tough Outlook

Li Auto Shares Shed 19% on Weak Earnings, Tough Outlook
Shares were on track for their biggest one-day selloff in more than two years

Li Auto LI -12.78%decrease; red down pointing triangle shares fell sharply in Hong Kong after the Chinese hybrid-vehicle specialist unveiled weaker-than-expected earnings and guidance after a lackluster launch of its first fully-electric model.

Shares were 19% lower at 80.70 Hong Kong dollars (US$10.35) by midday Tuesday, on track for their biggest one-day selloff in more than two years. Li Auto’s U.S.-listed ADRs slid 13% overnight.

Investors are reacting to Li Auto’s first-quarter earnings report late Monday, which showed an operating loss and a big miss on profits after it increased spending on research and development, and other operating expenses. Revenue rose 36% compared with the same period a year earlier but was down 39% from the preceding quarter as Li Auto struggled with the rollout of its first all-electric model.

The market was also reacting to Li Auto’s outlook as it guided for second-quarter deliveries of 105,000-110,000 vehicles, and revenue of up to 31.4 billion yuan, equivalent to $4.34 billion. The guidance was stronger compared with the second quarter of 2023, but well below its fourth-quarter performance. Chief Financial Officer Tie Li said in an earnings call that the April-June period will be “the most difficult quarter for the company in this year.”

Nomura analyst Joel Ying wrote in a note that the numbers mean Li Auto would need average monthly sales of about 60,000 vehicles in the second half of the year to achieve its annual sales target, which he thinks will be a challenge for the company.

CCB International analyst Qu Ke said the sales guidance was disappointing but the company’s announcement that it would postpone the launch of new vehicles could be helpful.

“Delay of [the launch of] EVs is for the best for Li Auto…since no one is making money out of it except BYD and Tesla given their massive volume output,” Qu said.

Bernstein analysts led by Eunice Lee said the delay was a positive strategy as it would buy Li Auto some time for product development and to reduce its margin dilution this year. Li Auto is “hitting a speed bump, not a roadblock,” analysts wrote in a note.

Li Auto managed to maintain a 20%-plus gross margin in the first quarter, although its margin on vehicles slipped to 19.3% from 19.8% a year ago and 22.7% in the fourth quarter because of changes in its pricing strategy. The company said it doesn’t currently have further plans for price cuts, though Goldman Sachs analysts forecast more price reductions in the second half of the year due to intense competition in China’s EV market.

“We see the next few quarters being a transition period for Li Auto,” Goldman Sachs analysts led by Tina Hou wrote in a note.

FT : Portugal’s national airline boss urges state to keep stake after sell-off

Portugal’s national airline boss urges state to keep stake after sell-off
TAP CEO Luís Rodrigues wants to lure non-aviation investors to ease competition concerns

The chief executive of Portugal’s national airline TAP has called on the government to maintain a stake in the flag carrier as he expects its planned sell-off to start in earnest within months.

Luís Rodrigues also wants to bring in non-aviation investors to ease competition concerns amid growing unease in Brussels over the prospect of an industry dominated by a handful of the region’s big airline groups. 

The Portuguese government put TAP up for sale last year, opening the way for more airline consolidation in Europe, and a potential bidding war involving the EU’s major carriers.

The new centre-right minority government, which was elected in March, said on the campaign trail it wanted to sell 100 per cent of the airline.

But Rodrigues stressed the state should keep a stake in the carrier, particularly given Portugal’s dependence on tourism. 

“My recommendation would be for the Portuguese government to maintain a position there, to be part of the whole development process,” he said.

“Just to make sure that if actors change, nobody will come in with a different agenda,” he added, pointing as an example the need to serve Portugal’s autonomous islands, Madeira and the Azores.

“I think some time we may be ready for a 100 per cent sale, but let’s take that step by step.”

Prime minister Luís Montenegro said during the election campaign that a 100 per cent stake sale should come with safeguards to protect Portugal’s strategic interests, such as maintaining Lisbon as a hub airport.

The previous government said it wanted to sell more than 50 per cent of the company but less than 100 per cent and keep a stake in the hands of the state.

Europe’s three big airline groups IAG, Air France-KLM and Lufthansa, which own a range of subsidiaries and want to expand further, have expressed an interest in TAP amid a sharp rise in dealmaking across the sector.

The Portuguese airline offers strong links to Brazil and the lucrative South American market for companies that do not already have a foothold there, as well as a way into Africa through its routes to the Portuguese-speaking countries of Angola and Mozambique.

IAG has already agreed a deal to buy Spain’s Air Europa, while Lufthansa has taken a 41 per cent stake in ITA Airways, the successor company to Alitalia.

Air France has also taken a 20 per cent stake in struggling Scandinavian airline SAS as part of a deal involving private equity firm Castlelake and the Danish state.

Rodrigues said he expected the airline to keep its brand name and identity in any deal and suggested the government might want to involve private equity or other investors rather than sell directly to one airline, partly to help ease competition concerns in Brussels.

IAG and Lufthansa’s deals are being investigated by EU regulators.

“If we design a sale that is not 100 per cent [of the airline], and that may be not necessarily to one group but to airlines [plus] finance or private equity, or local capital, which is always a good thing politically, that might be much more fluid and easier,” Rodrigues said. 

However, he remains convinced the industry trend towards consolidation will continue. “I believe we need a little more consolidation in Europe.”

He added: “I would love by the end of 2025 for the whole thing to be done with . . . That’s not going to be easy, but if everything goes all right, I think that’s possible.”

FT : Activist investor builds stake in Reckitt after baby formula verdict

Activist investor builds stake in Reckitt after baby formula verdict
Eminence Capital began buying shares in March when they were hit by a $60mn US damages award

Activist investor Eminence Capital has built a stake in Dettol and Nurofen maker Reckitt, piling further pressure on the consumer goods group whose share price has plunged over fears that its baby formula business could be on the hook for billions in damages.

Eminence, which has been leading an activist campaign against FTSE 100 gambling group Entain, owns at least 0.5 per cent of Reckitt’s stock, after it began buying up shares in March as they sank towards an all-time low, according to people familiar with the matter.

Shares in Reckitt, which also manufactures Lysol detergent and Durex condoms, are down about 15 per cent this year after a US jury ruled in March that one of its infant formulas had caused the death of a premature infant, and ordered the consumer goods company to pay $60mn in damages.

Analysts have estimated the total liability from the infant formula litigation could be anywhere between £400mn and £8bn.

The group’s market value was about £40.5bn at market close in London on Monday.

The presence of the New York-based activist fund, which has around $6.7bn of assets under management, on Reckitt’s shareholder register was likely to increase calls for Kris Licht, its chief executive, to push through a sale of the baby formula division, the people said.

Eminence also believed Reckitt’s management could do more to improve operating margins, which have shrunk in recent years, they added.

Eminence declined to comment. Reckitt did not immediately respond when contacted for comment.

Other activist investors were also circling Reckitt, according to people familiar with the matter, with investors believing that the fallout from the Illinois jury’s verdict had disproportionately weighed down its stock price. Eminence’s shareholding, which has not previously been reported, is below the UK disclosure threshold of 3 per cent.

Reckitt’s acquisition of infant formula manufacturer Mead Johnson for $17bn in 2017 is now widely regarded as a misguided move. The company has previously tried unsuccessfully to offload the business and sold its Chinese unit to private equity group Primavera for $2.2bn.

Reckitt has recently appointed a new chair, former Sky boss Sir Jeremy Darroch, who is also on the Disney board.

Speaking to the Financial Times following a 14 per cent one-day share price decline in March, Licht said Reckitt would appeal against the verdict and insisted that it had no liability.

Eminence has yet to meet Reckitt’s management and board in person, but has corresponded with the company. It is unlikely the activist investor would push for a management shake-up, according to a person familiar with its thinking.

Eminence founder and chief executive Ricky Sandler earlier this year took a board seat at Ladbrokes owner Entain and played a pivotal role in pushing for Entain’s chief executive Jette Nygaard-Andersen to leave and the naming of a new chair.

As well as the infant formula crisis, Reckitt shareholders have contended with a first-quarter revenue hit in the company’s Middle East business, after it reported an accounting anomaly.

>>> US After Hours Summary: TRNS +3.8% up on earnings; NDSN -12.4%, PANW -8.3% d

After Hours Summary: TRNS +3.8% up on earnings; NDSN -12.4%, PANW -8.3% down following quarterly results; PTON -5.9% dropping on global refinancing

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: TRNS +3.8%, DJT +0.8%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: LRMR +23.4% (FDA removes partial clinical hold), INFU +7.8% ($20 mln repurchase plan), APA +0.4% (over $700 mln in asset sales), DYN +0.2% ($300 mln stock offering), FWRD +0.2% (CFO to step down; names interim CFO), CAAP +0.1% (reports April traffic data)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: NDSN -12.4%, PANW -8.3%, HSAI -4.9%, KEYS -2.7%, ZM -0.7%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: PTON -5.9% (launching global refinancing), FIHL -4.1% (launches secondary stock offering), ZS -2.3% (trading in sympathy with PANW), TALK -1.8% (CFO stepping down; names new CFO), FTNT -1.7% (trading in sympathy with PANW), SUZ -1.5% (discussing higher bid for International Paper, according to Reuters), CRWD -1.5% (trading in sympathy with PANW), LNC -1.3% (stock offering related to incentive compensation plan), NRIX -0.9% (Board Chair stepping down; names new Chair), NWL -0.9% (files $2.75 bln mixed shelf), OKTA -0.9% (trading in sympathy with PANW), HL -0.5%, ALG -0.2% (strike at subsidiary ends), MO -0.1% (submits supplemental Premarket Tobacco Product Application to FDA), T -0.1% (provides updates ahead of conference; on track to meet financial guidance)

TechCrunch : VinFast crash that killed family of four now under federal investig

VinFast crash that killed family of four now under federal investigation

The top vehicle safety regulator in the U.S. has launched a formal probe into an April crash involving the all-electric VinFast VF8 SUV that claimed the lives of a family of four, TechCrunch has learned.

The crash happened in Pleasanton, California at about 9 p.m. on April 24. Police told local news outlets at the time that it appeared the vehicle lost control before crashing into an oak tree and catching fire. A spokesperson for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) told TechCrunch on Monday that its Special Crash Investigations division will “document the crash circumstances and the ensuing fire.”

The victims, who have been identified by the Alameda County Sheriff’s Department as Tarun and Rincy George, and their two children, did not own the vehicle.

A few days after the crash, a complaint was lodged with NHTSA that explained the owner had loaned the EV to a co-worker. The purported owner had experienced at least one instance where the car’s lane assist feature had jerked the vehicle to the right, according to the complaint.

The National Transportation Safety Board told TechCrunch on Monday that it has not opened an investigation into the crash. The Pleasanton police department said its own investigation is ongoing. VinFast did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Vietnamese EV-maker VinFast started shipping its VF8 SUV to the U.S. in early 2023. The rollout has not gone well. The company was pilloried by reviewers for poor quality. In May 2023, it issued a recall over problems with the dashboard screen going blank. At least one other complaint lodged with NHTSA at the time this article was published references an incident where the driver assistance system unexpectedly turned the wheel.

>>> US Close Dow -0.49% S1P +0.09% Nasdaq +0.65% Russell +0.32%

Closing Stock Market Summary
The Nasdaq Composite (+0.7%) logged another record closing high, support by gains in mega caps and semiconductor-related names. The S&P 500 (+0.2%) and Russell 2000 (+0.3%) also closed with gains and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-0.5%) fell nearly 200 points.

Market breadth favored advancers by a slim margin at both the NYSE and at the Nasdaq. The overall upside bias was driven by carryover momentum following last week's solid gains in addition to the strength in mega caps and chipmakers. The PHLX Semiconductor Index (SOX) jumped 2.2% and the Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) logged a 0.7% gain.

NVIDIA (NVDA 947.80, +23.01, +2.5%) was a winning standout from both spaces after several analysts raised their price targets in front of NVDA's earnings report Wednesday afternoon. Microsoft (MSFT 425.34, +5.13, +1.2%) also logged a decent gain after introducing Co Pilot+ PCs and in front of its Build Developers Conference, which starts tomorrow.

The S&P 500 information technology sector (+1.3%) led the index by a wide margin, benefitting from price action in its semiconductor and mega cap components.

The heavily-weighted financial sector logged the largest loss, falling 1.2%. This price action was due in part to a sizable loss in JPMorgan Chase (JPM 195.58, -9.21, -4.5%) after turning lower in response to CEO Dimon saying at its Investor Day that the company is not expecting to buy back a lot of stock at these levels.

The consumer discretionary sector (-0.7%) was the next worst performer due to losses in Amazon.com (AMZN 183.54, -1.16, -0.6%) and Tesla (TSLA 174.95, -2.51, -1.4%). Declines in retailer components also contributed to the underperformance of the consumer discretionary sector in front of earnings report from some influential names in the space this week.

Market rates settled slightly higher, acting as a limiting factor for equities. The 10-yr note yield settled two basis points higher at 4.44% and the 2-yr note yield rose two basis points to 4.84%.

There was no US economic data of note today and will be none tomorrow. The Minutes from the April 30-May 1 FOMC meeting and the Existing Home Sales report for April will be released Wednesday, the weekly jobless claims report and New Home Sales report for April will be released Thursday, and the Durable Goods Orders for April will be released Friday.

  • S&P 500:+11.3% YTD
  • Nasdaq Composite: +11.9% YTD
  • S&P Midcap 400: +8.6% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: +5.6% YTD
  • Russell 2000: +3.7% YTD