FT : Carrefour seeks way out of strategic impasse

Carrefour seeks way out of strategic impasse
Retailer’s CEO Alexandre Bompard is examining range of options including disposals as share price lags peers

The French supermarket group was in talks with Canada’s Alimentation Couche-Tard to sell itself in a €16.2bn deal which would have created a transatlantic retail giant.

However that proposal was rapidly shut down by France’s finance ministry within a matter of days, on the grounds that it threatened the country’s food security. Later that year, Carrefour and smaller privately held French rival Auchan ended talks over a €19.4bn tie-up after the two sides failed to agree on terms and Carrefour faced opposition from some of its top shareholders. 

In the intervening years the Paris-listed group’s share price has stagnated at around €15 while it trades at a sizeable discount to the MSCI Europe Food & Staples Retailing index. Carrefour’s market capitalisation has also shrunk by more than a quarter to under €10bn since chief executive Alexandre Bompard took the helm in 2017.

That is partly why the 52-year-old executive has been examining a wide range of options with its advisers to boost valuation, four people with knowledge of the situation said.

Scenarios have included disposals, including Carrefour’s operations in Italy or Poland, one of the people said, who cautioned the deliberations which were first reported by Bloomberg were at a preliminary stage.

“What is certain is that Bompard is looking for a way out of Carrefour’s current situation. He can’t be satisfied with the current valuation,” said one of the people. “Conversations like this always take a long time to come to a decision because you’re weighing it against alternative scenarios such as a transaction on the whole.”

Bompard has been frustrated by Carrefour’s performance, several people familiar with the situation said. But gaining momentum in the competitive, low margin grocery retail business is notoriously difficult — especially as inflation has put pressure on consumers.

It is even more challenging in the fractured, highly competitive French market, which accounted for over a third of Carrefour’s global 14,930-strong store network and just under half of its €94.1bn in sales and operating income of €2.26bn last year.

The fifth largest supermarket group in Europe by sales, Carrefour has gained market share in its core French market in the past year — moving from 19 per cent at the start of the year to 21.4 per cent according to Kantar — thanks to investment in cutting prices and acquiring smaller rivals Cora and Match from Belgium’s Louis Delhaize group earlier this year. 

Over the years Bompard has aggressively cut costs and prices to woo customers and invested in ecommerce to catch up with competitors. He has also converted underperforming large format stores into franchises.

Carrefour has more than halved its product price gap with Leclerc, the historical price leader in France, compared to last year, analysts at Barclays noted. 

However while sales and cash generation have improved, operating margins have been difficult to budge and have declined slightly over the past three years, moving from 3.06 per cent in 2021 to 2.67 per cent last year.

Sales in France fell 3 per cent on a like-for-like basis to €11.7bn in its most recent quarter although volumes improved as the company invests in pricing amid fierce competition.

“This competitive pricing strategy is bearing fruit — Carrefour has started to regain market share in volume terms,” analysts at Barclays wrote. “A recovery in French margins is key for future earnings growth. The management team’s focus is on turning around domestic operations.”

Carrefour declined to comment for this story.


The question is what now. Selling out of non-core markets is a tactic Carrefour has employed before. It exited China, which was lossmaking, in 2019 as part of a global consolidation strategy after a period of rapid expansion that stretched the company’s resources. It also sold out of Taiwan in 2022, and departed Colombia in 2012.

“Exit multiples were very good for Colombia and Taiwan. Sales like this have been done before in the industry, and by Carrefour. It makes sense to retrench on the core when business is challenging,” said Cedric Lecasble, analyst at Stifel.

Spain and Brazil are both strong markets for Carrefour so are unlikely to be top candidates if Carrefour were to move forward with asset sales, Lecasble added. However mature, non-core European markets like Italy, Belgium, Romania or Poland could make sense, he said. 

The most radical solution would be a sale, such as to private equity groups. While the option has been floated by advisers over the years, the idea is fraught with difficulty, the people said. People close to the company insist it is not on the table.

Pharmaceutical giant Sanofi’s proposed deal to sell its consumer health division to American private equity firm Clayton Dubilier & Rice in October set off a political firestorm. The French state has decided to take a small stake in the €16bn spin-off in order to guarantee its interests on issues like jobs and health supply chains. 

“Carrefour is one of the biggest employers in the country, and a private equity sale implies cost retrenchments and job cuts. The opposition on the social and political sides would be huge,” said Lecasble. 

Those constraints, plus the difficulties of the sector, may dampen interest. When the prospect had been floated to private equity in the past “the reaction has been: to do what with it?” said another banker in Paris. “The exit and synergies aren’t obvious.”

But with the share price still depressed and management keen for answers, “now could be a time to look at it, and other options, again,” said a third banker. 

FT :BHP chief sees signs of recovery in China after September stimulus

BHP chief sees signs of recovery in China after September stimulus
Mike Henry says ‘green shoots’ in property, where miner’s iron ore and copper fuel construction

The head of Australian miner BHP has said he sees long-awaited “green shoots” in China’s depressed property market after Beijing unveiled a stimulus package to try to boost the economy.

The world’s largest mining group relies on China’s construction industry to fuel demand for its iron ore and copper, and Mike Henry, chief executive, said there were signs of recovery.

“We’re finally starting to see some green shoots,” he said in a Financial Times interview in Tokyo. “If you look at the parts of the economy that are lagging, it has been consumption and property. Surprise, surprise, it comes back to consumer confidence.”

Henry said policymakers needed to structure stimulus in a way that built consumer confidence, while cautioning: “I don’t know that it’s ever going to be just a matter of money.”

China launched a stimulus package in September, including interest rate cuts and funding for the stock market. Following the measures, sales for the 100 biggest property developers rose year on year in October for the first time in 2024.

Lawmakers have spent three years grappling with a seismic property showdown and are meeting in Beijing this week after previously signalling more support for local governments that rely heavily on land sales.

BHP is the world’s third-largest producer of iron ore, a key steelmaking ingredient, and a top miner of copper, widely used for electrical wiring when buildings are finished. The health of China’s property sector has thus been a big factor in driving commodities prices and profit levels.

Henry suggested that iron ore prices might not be buoyed much beyond their current level of just above $100 a tonne as China’s excess steel production would be channelled towards domestic real estate. He said that would help ease surging Chinese steel exports, on course to be the highest since 2016.

The BHP chief also addressed speculation about deal activity.

In May, it dropped a £39bn takeover pursuit of UK mining rival Anglo American, yet under UK rules it can come back with an offer at the end of this month, when a six-month embargo expires.

A recent visit by Henry and Catherine Raw, BHP’s head of mergers and acquisitions, to South Africa, where BHP no longer has operations but Anglo has platinum and iron ore mines, has fuelled speculation that the mining industry heavyweight could soon table another offer.

Henry said the visit had “nothing to do with the acquisition opportunity”, claiming instead it was for general relationship-building with new ministers in Pretoria, as well as for visiting investors and people related to a BHP-backed nickel project in Tanzania.

BHP landed itself in a pickle last week over comments by chair Ken MacKenzie, who said at the company’s annual meeting it had “moved on” from the failed Anglo takeover attempt.

The company later backpedalled, issuing a statement saying Mackenzie’s comments were not intended as formal market guidance that no further offer would be made.

FT :The end of Germany’s dysfunctional coalition offers Europe new hope

The end of Germany’s dysfunctional coalition offers Europe new hope
Paralysis in Berlin is a big reason the EU is ill-prepared for Donald Trump’s return

Barely 12 hours after Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election, his America First policy claimed its first European victim with the collapse of Germany’s coalition government.

The three coalition partners — Olaf Scholz’s Social Democrats, the Greens of economy minister Robert Habeck and the liberal Free Democrats of finance minister Christian Lindner — have been at loggerheads for months over policy to the point of paralysis. On Wednesday, they convened to try to resolve their differences over a €9bn hole in the 2025 budget.

The dispute over the fiscal shortfall — a tiny sum set against planned expenditure of more than €2tn — was in reality a proxy for a much wider, and ultimately unbridgeable, ideological divide. Scholz and Habeck have long wanted Lindner to agree to relax Germany’s strict debt rules so the government can spend more on defence, support for Ukraine and reviving the economy. Scholz argued on Wednesday that with Trump’s return to the White House, Russia’s war against Ukraine was precisely the kind of emergency that allows the rules to be relaxed. Lindner refused and was fired, spelling the end of the coalition.

It was a rare display of decisiveness by Scholz who, with some justification, rounded on his finance minister, accusing him of acting irresponsibly and in bad faith. It is easy to blame Lindner and the FDP. They have instigated many of the coalition’s bust-ups for their own political gain. The FDP’s poll rating has sunk below the 5 per cent threshold for representation in the Bundestag and Lindner was looking for a reason to bail out. His timing is terrible, given how much is at stake for Germany’s prosperity and security at this juncture. But the bickering and indecision afflicting the government had become untenable.

Europe is badly prepared for a Trump presidency. Its strategy has been to hope for the best rather than plan for the worst. It has lacked a sense of urgency in arming Ukraine and bolstering its own security. Germany’s political shambles is not the only reason. France is in political disarray and President Emmanuel Macron has suffered a dramatic loss of authority. The big European economies are in the doldrums and budgets are under severe strain. But the EU is invariably stuck when there is a power vacuum in Berlin. Germany is Europe’s indispensable nation. The EU cannot revive its economy or take on more responsibility for its own security unless Berlin deploys its fiscal firepower to make it happen, whether at home or through the EU, in the form of more joint borrowing.

Scholz was at his most impressive when he declared a Zeitenwende, or watershed moment, for his country in the wake of Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022. He promised a long-term commitment to turn Germany into a military power, “with the strength of our own” to keep tyrants such as Putin in check. But his ambition quickly ran out of steam. And while his government rapidly weaned German industry off Russian fossil fuels, the economy is suffering the consequences and is struggling to find a new growth model.

Many Germans feel their country needs new direction and ideas. The Social Democrats and Greens have haemorrhaged popular support. Scholz on Wednesday appealed to the opposition Christian Democrats to find common ground on the urgent need for measures to support the economy and strengthen defence. Germany must not follow America, where “ideology has made co-operation across political boundaries almost impossible”, he said. Scholz is right, not least because Germany’s political system is designed for coalition government. However, the CDU is likely to see that as an attempt to play for time and enhance Scholz’s legacy, when they would prefer fresh elections even sooner than March.

The so-called red-yellow-green or “traffic light” coalition was seriously on the blink and could not continue. But it is regrettable that the EU’s most powerful member will be consumed by an election campaign just as Trump returns to office threatening punitive tariffs against German and European imports, a withdrawal of the US security umbrella and an unfair peace deal for Ukraine. A divided Germany has a lot to lose.

FT : Chinese exports soar as Beijing prepares for trade tensions with Donald Tru

Chinese exports soar as Beijing prepares for trade tensions with Donald Trump
China could respond to aggressive new tariffs with bigger stimulus action or currency depreciation, say analysts

China’s exports soared in October and its trade surplus ballooned, official data showed on Thursday, just days after Donald Trump won the US presidential election with promises of sweeping tariffs to suppress imports from China.

The central bank also set its official exchange rate against the dollar at the lowest level in a year, in a sign that Beijing is expecting further depreciation pressure on the renminbi following Trump’s victory.

President Xi Jinping called Trump on Thursday to congratulate him on his electoral victory, according to Chinese state news agency Xinhua. Xi told Trump that trade between the world’s two largest economies would “benefit from co-operation and suffer from confrontation”, it reported.

But the bumper export figures are expected to inflame tensions between Trump’s incoming administration and Beijing, which could respond to aggressive new tariffs with bigger stimulus action, said analysts and bankers.

China’s dollar-denominated exports rose 12.7 per cent year on year in October, exceeding an average forecast of 5 per cent by analysts surveyed by Bloomberg and a gain of 2.4 per cent in September.

Imports declined 2.3 per cent last month, worse than a Bloomberg forecast of a 2 per cent fall and 0.3 per cent growth in September.

Trade between China and the US was more subdued than the headline figures but still showed strong growth. Exports rose 8.1 per cent in October, while China’s imports from the US climbed 6.6 per cent.


Chinese analysts said China’s burgeoning trade surplus — which hit $95.7bn in October compared with forecasts of $75bn — would provoke Trump, who could undo President Joe Biden’s work in repairing communication between the countries.

“Of course China will be on top of the list,” said Wang Dong, a professor at Peking University. “The stability, the relative improvement that we have been witnessing . . . will probably come to an end,” he added, predicting “a resumption of enmity and antagonism between Washington and Beijing”.

The People’s Bank of China has maintained a strong renminbi policy this year, keeping its daily reference rate — which sets a 2 per cent trading band for the currency — within an unusually narrow range.

The fixed rate on Thursday of Rmb7.166 a dollar marked the currency’s sharpest one-day weakening since April 2022 and came after it tumbled 1 per cent against the dollar on Wednesday.

Trump has threatened to impose 60 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods, which analysts said could spur Communist party leaders, who have been reluctant to embark on a wholesale fiscal stimulus, into more determined action to boost the economy.

Chinese lawmakers are expected on Friday to unveil a fiscal package that will include debt swaps for troubled local governments and potentially additional stimulus measures.

A Trump win “is not necessarily bad for China as this may ‘pressure’ Beijing [to implement] a bigger stimulus”, Qi Wang, chief investment officer for wealth management at UOB Kay Hian, wrote in a note.

But analysts do not anticipate a spending “bazooka” to prop up lagging household demand, which has been hit by a prolonged property slowdown and risks plunging the economy into a deflationary spiral.

“Everyone is expecting a big China fiscal stimulus post the US election.” said a senior investment banker at a US financial institution in Hong Kong who wished to remain unnamed. “I think markets will be far more driven by that than anything else . . . in the near term.”

The size of any additional stimulus will depend on Trump’s new tariffs, experts said. Analysts estimated prior to Trump’s victory that Beijing would need to spend Rmb10tn ($1.4tn) on stimulus directly targeting households, rather than Chinese policymakers’ preferred tools of infrastructure investment and local government refinancing.

“Debt swaps are one item of the package, but there will be other expenditures to stimulate consumption,” said Ma Wei, associate researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a government think-tank in Beijing. “Maybe not in the form of giving money to everyone like in the US, but giving some subsidies to ordinary people to buy goods like cars and electronics.”

Ma predicted policymakers would wait until December or January to announce additional measures. China’s Communist party leadership will hold their annual Central Economic Work Conference, a landmark meeting for economic policy, in December.

>>> US After Hours Summary: APP +28.4%, LYFT +21.5%, BROS +16.8%, FRSH +15.4%, Z

After Hours Summary: APP +28.4%, LYFT +21.5%, BROS +16.8%, FRSH +15.4%, ZG +14.3%, GH +13.4%, QCOM +6% higher on earnings; APPS -41%, CDLX -29.9%, SEDG -21.1%, MELI -9.2%, DUOL -5.9% lower on earnings

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: APP +28.4% (also increases its share repurchase authorization by $2 bln), LYFT +21.5%, BROS +16.8%, FRSH +15.4% (also authorizes new $400 mln share repurchase program), ZG +14.3%, GH +13.4%, MKSI +11.2%, WAY +8.2%, UPWK +8% (also to acquire Objective AI, announces new $100 mln share repurchase auth), MEOH +7.8%, ZIP +7.3%, ELF +6.8%, RLJ +6.8%, HUBS +6.7%, RAMP +6.5%, LZ +6.3%, BBSI +6%, QCOM +6% (also authorizes a new $15 bln stock repurchase plan; also files mixed shelf securities offering), CPRX +5.6%, ASPN +5.3%, MCK +5.2%, KIND +5.2%, CERT +5.1%, ALNT +5%, ARDT +4.6%, TTWO +4.4%, VTLE +3.9%, WK +3.8%, KD +3.7%, PYCR +3.7%, CDE +3.5%, HCAT +3.4% (also to acquire Intraprise Health), VCYT +3.3%, CXW +3.2%, GILD +3%, MODV +2.7%, RCUS +2.7%, MWA +2.6%, VAC +2.5%, RPD +2.3%, AMED +2.3%, LTM +2.1%, COHR +2%, ANSS +1.9%, MFC +1.7%, SITM +1.3%, ACAD +0.9%, ET +0.8%, ODD +0.8%, COTY +0.7%, GFL +0.7%, RGNX +0.6%, VSTO +0.6%, LB +0.5%, VZIO +0.5%, FICO +0.2%, GNK +0.2%, AWR +0.1%, BTG +0.1%, CXT +0.1%, FSK +0.1%, KAR +0.1%, KGS +0.1%, RNR +0.1% (also increases share repurchase auth to $750 mln), SKT +0.1%, STE +0.1%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: EBS +19.3% (brincidofovir will be included in a clinical trial), SEER +2.4% (SEER enters into co-marketing and sales agreement with TMO), ABUS +1.8% (files $300 mln mixed shelf securities offering), BBIO +1.5% (Viking Global (Andreas Halvorsen) affirmed 13.4% active stake), TMO +0.8% (SEER enters into co-marketing and sales agreement with TMO), IDXX +0.2% (amends supply agreement)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: APPS -41%, CDLX -29.9%, SEDG -21.1% (also names new Chairman), WOLF -18.7%, MTCH -15%, CRSR -12.9%, CLOV -12.9%, KVYO -11.2%, CTVA -9.7%, JXN -9.3%, MELI -9.2%, KRUS -8.7%, AMC -5.9%, DUOL -5.9%, ARM -5.5%, TNDM -5.4%, BYND -5.3%, ACLS -5.2%, RXRX -5.2%, EOLS -5.1%, RGLD -5%, FBIN -4.4%, SUI -4.4% (also announces restructuring and CEO retirement), AGI -4.3%, TRIP -4.1%, OR -3.9%, IIPR -3.6%, JOBY -3.6%, KW -3.4%, STR -3.4%, CWAN -3.3%, DV -2.9%, AEE -2.8%, CLNE -2.8%, JANX -2.5%, KNTK -2.3%, RVMD -2.3%, TS -2.3% (also approves a $700 mln follow-on share buyback program), FSLY -2%, NTR -2%, WES -1.8%, ALB -1.7% (also provides update on operating structure review; announces a 6-7% workforce reduction), SRPT -1.6%, RLAY -1.4%, ENLC -1.2%, DLX -1%, MRO -1%, APA -0.9%, IONQ -0.9% (also to acquire Qubitekk; also partners with ANSS to enhance engineering simulation), TPC -0.9%, ECG -0.9%, CHRD -0.7% (also authorizes new $750 mln share repurchase program), HL -0.6%, VSAT -0.6%, BALY -0.5%, CYTK -0.5%, OSUR -0.5%, QTWO -0.5%, BMBL -0.3%, COOK -0.3%, PR -0.3%, VECO -0.3% (also receives $50+ mln of orders in 2024 for its WaferStorm system), ADTN -0.2%, LAW -0.2%, RDN -0.1%, SBGI -0.1%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: CNTX -5.4% (files $250 mln mixed shelf securities offering), KMT -1.1% (files mixed shelf securities offering), MHK -0.9% (COO to retire, names new COO), COST -0.3% (reports Oct comps), CDMO -0.2% (to be acquired for $12.50/sh by investment firms)

FT : Keith Jarrett: The Old Country: More From the Deer Head Inn — top-drawer pi

Keith Jarrett: The Old Country: More From the Deer Head Inn — top-drawer piano-trio jazz
This recording of the pianist’s 1992 gig with bassist Gary Peacock and drummer Paul Motian sounds fluid, focused and fresh

Delaware’s intimate Deer Head Inn occupies a special place in Keith Jarrett’s journey from child prodigy to jazz superstar. It was there that the pianist, fresh out of school, played his first serious jazz trio gig. And it was also there, as drummer with the house trio, that he spent weekends jamming with the venue’s regular visiting jazz stars. In 1964 Jarrett moved to New York. Sideman duties with Charles Lloyd and Miles Davis followed. In 1975 his solo piano recording The Koln Concert established Jarrett as one of his generation’s few jazz superstars.

Yet his affection for that early-years venue never waned and in 1992, some 30 years after moving to New York, Jarrett returned to the Deer Head Inn for a full-to-the-rafters fundraising gig. Gary Peacock, from Jarrett’s Standards Trio, was on bass and Paul Motian, from Jarrett’s American Quartet, was on drums. It was the only time this particular trio line-up ever played together and the pianist and drummer had not performed together for 16 years. Jarrett delivered a lead voice tour de force and the rhythm section an ad hoc masterclass of support.

Seven songs from that gig, released in 1994 under the title At the Deer Head Inn, are established highlights of Jarrett’s voluminous discography. Now, for the first time, The Old Country releases the remaining eight. Jazz standards still mix with songbook evergreens, the trio dovetail brilliantly and the playing is fluid, focused and fresh. Jarrett describes the event as “a reunion and a jam session at the same time,” which exactly fits the music’s warmth, ease and sense of mutual respect.

The opener finds Jarrett at his melodically inventive best, the angularity of Monk’s “Straight No Chaser” is captured and Nat Adderley’s “The Old Country” is soulful and bittersweet. There’s a moving cover of “How Long Has This Been Going On” and the ballad is played beautifully. Here’s top-drawer piano-trio jazz that consistently holds sway.

TechCrunch : What Trump’s victory could mean for AI regulation

What Trump’s victory could mean for AI regulation

A grueling election cycle has come to a close. Donald Trump will be the 47th president of the U.S., and, with Republicans in control of the Senate — and possibly the House — his allies are poised to bring sea change to the highest levels of government.

The effects will be acutely felt in the AI industry, which has largely rallied against federal policymaking. Trump has repeatedly said he plans to dismantle Biden’s AI policy framework on “day one” and has aligned himself with kingmakers who’ve sharply criticized all but the lightest-touch regulations.

Biden’s approach
Biden’s AI policy came into force through executive order, the AI Executive Order, passed in October 2023. Congressional inaction on regulation precipitated the executive order, whose precepts are voluntary — not compulsory.

The AI EO addresses everything from advancing AI in healthcare to developing guidance designed to mitigate risks of IP theft. But two of its more consequential provisions — which have raised the ire of some Republicans — pertain to AI’s security risks and real-world safety impacts.

One provision directs companies developing powerful AI models to report to the government how they’re training and securing these models, and to provide the results of tests designed to probe for model vulnerabilities. The other provision directs the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to author guidance that helps companies identify — and correct for — flaws in models, including biases.

The AI EO accomplished much. In the last year, the Commerce Department established the U.S. AI Safety Institute (AISI), a body to study risks in AI systems, inclusive of systems with defense applications. It also released new software to help improve the trustworthiness of AI, and tested major new AI models through agreements with OpenAI and Anthropic.

Critics allied with Trump argue that the EO’s reporting requirements are onerous and effectively force companies to disclose their trade secrets. During a House hearing in March, Representative Nancy Mace (R-SC) said they “could scare away would-be innovators and impede more ChatGPT-type breakthroughs.”

Because the requirements lean on an interpretation of the Defense Production Act, a 1950s-era law to support national defense, they’ve also been labeled by some Republicans in Congress as an example of executive overreach.

At a Senate hearing in July, Trump’s running mate, JD Vance, expressed concerns that “preemptive overregulation attempts” would “entrench the tech incumbents that we already have.” Vance has also been supportive of antitrust, including efforts by FTC chair Lina Khan, who’s spearheading investigations of big tech companies’ acqui-hires of AI startups.

Several Republicans have equated NIST’s work on AI with censorship of conservative speech. They accuse the Biden administration of attempting to steer AI development with liberal notions about disinformation and bias; Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) recently slammed NIST’s “woke AI ‘safety’ standards” as a “plan to control speech” based on “amorphous” social harms.

“When I’m re-elected,” Trump said at a rally in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, last December, “I will cancel Biden’s artificial intelligence executive order and ban the use of AI to censor the speech of American citizens on day one.”

Replacing the AI EO
So what could replace Biden’s AI EO?

Little can be gleaned from the AI executive orders Trump signed during his last presidential term, which founded national AI research institutes and directed federal agencies to prioritize AI R&D. His EOs mandated that agencies “protect civil liberties, privacy, and American values” in applying AI, help workers gain AI-relevant skills, and promote the use of “trustworthy” technologies.

During his campaign, Trump promised policies that would “support AI development rooted in free speech and human flourishing” — but declined to go into detail.

Some Republicans have said that they want NIST to focus on AI’s physical safety risks, including its ability to help adversaries build bioweapons (which Biden’s EO also addresses). But they’ve also shied away from endorsing new restrictions on AI, which could jeopardize portions of NIST’s guidance.

Indeed, the fate of the AISI, which is housed within NIST, is murky. While it has a budget, director, and partnerships with AI research institutes worldwide, the AISI could be wound down with a simple repeal of Biden’s EO.

In an open letter in October, a coalition of companies, nonprofits, and universities called on Congress to enact legislation codifying the AISI before the end of the year.

Trump has acknowledged that AI is “very dangerous” and that it’ll require massive amounts of power to develop and run, suggesting a willingness to engage with the growing risks from AI.

This being the case, Sarah Kreps, a political scientist who focuses on U.S. defense policy, doesn’t expect major AI regulation to emerge from the White House in the next four years. “I don’t know that Trump’s views on AI regulation will rise to the level of antipathy that causes him to repeal the Biden AI EO,” she told TechCrunch.

Trade and state rulemaking
Dean Ball, a research fellow at George Mason University, agrees that Trump’s victory likely augurs a light-touch regulatory regime — one that’ll rely on the application of existing law rather than the creation of new laws. However, Ball predicts that this may embolden state governments, particularly in Democratic strongholds like California, to try to fill the void.

State-led efforts are well underway. In March, Tennessee passed a law protecting voice artists from AI cloning. This summer, Colorado adopted a tiered, risk-based approach to AI deployments. And in September, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed dozens of AI-related safety bills, a few of which require companies to publish details about their AI training.

State policymakers have introduced close to 700 pieces of AI legislation this year alone.

“How the federal government will respond to these challenges is unclear,” Ball said.

Hamid Ekbia, a professor at Syracuse University studying public affairs, believes that Trump’s protectionist policies could have AI regulatory implications. He expects the Trump administration to impose tighter export controls on China, for instance — including controls on the technologies necessary for developing AI.

The Biden administration already has in place a number of bans on the export of AI chips and models. However, some Chinese firms are reportedly using loopholes to access the tools through cloud services.

“The global regulation of AI will suffer as a consequence [of new controls], despite the circumstances that call for more global cooperation,” Ekbia said. “The political and geopolitical ramifications of this can be huge, enabling more authoritarian and oppressive uses of AI across the globe.”

Should Trump enact tariffs on the tech necessary to build AI, it could also squeeze the capital needed to fund AI R&D, says Matt Mittelsteadt, another research fellow at George Mason University. During his campaign, Trump proposed a 10% tariff on all U.S. imports and 60% on Chinese-made products.

“Perhaps the biggest impact will come from trade policies,” Mittelsteadt said. “Expect any potential tariffs to have a massive economic impact on the AI sector.”

Of course, it’s early. And while Trump for the most part avoided addressing AI on the campaign trail, much of his platform — like his plan to restrict H-1B visas and embrace oil and gas — could have downstream effects on the AI industry.

Sandra Wachter, a professor in data ethics at the Oxford Internet Institute, urged regulators, regardless of their political affiliations, not to lose sight of the dangers of AI for its opportunities.

“These risks exist regardless of where you sit on the political spectrum,” she said. “These harms do not believe in geography and do not care about party lines. I can only hope that AI governance will not be reduced to a partisan issue — it is an issue that affects all of us, everywhere. We all have to work together to find good global solutions.”

TechCrunch : What Trump’s win might mean for Elon Musk

What Trump’s win might mean for Elon Musk

Elon Musk – the billionaire CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI, and the owner of The Boring Company, Neuralink, and X – took a sharp swing to the right this election to support president-elect Donald Trump, using his vast wealth, influence, and megaphone on X to influence the outcome of the election.

Musk’s support came in spite of Trump’s anti-EV stance and climate change skepticism, and it’s a pivot from the executive’s relationship with Trump years ago. Musk served on two advisory councils during Trump’s first term, but left them both in protest of Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accords.

Musk – who is worth over $260 billion and donated over $100 million to a pro-Trump super PAC – is now poised to be the incoming president’s most influential political and business adviser. Trump promised Musk the position as head of a new Department of Government Efficiency during a September appearance at the Economic Club of New York.

(Musk has nicknamed the not-yet-formed department DOGE, a nod to his meme cryptocurrency, causing the coin to jump in market capitalization over 6% in the last 24 hours.)

The role could give the billionaire executive the power to recommend deep cuts to what he thinks of as a “vast federal bureaucracy…holding back America in a big way.”

During Trump’s victory speech, he gave his biggest donor a shout out, calling him a “super genius” and adding that “we need to protect our geniuses.” Trump said separately on Tuesday night, “A star is born, Elon.”

Many have predicted that there will be a falling out between the two huge personalities before Trump’s four-year term is over, but even if a fraction of Musk’s plans for DOGE become reality, it could mark one of the most consequential instances of a businessman helping shape the policy and regulations that govern his businesses.

Here’s what we think a Trump win means for Musk and his businesses.

Using the Tesla method to cut government spending
While Trump has gained power largely by marketing himself as a good businessman, despite several bankruptcies, Musk can at least claim that he has been successful in his endeavors (X notwithstanding). According to Jon McNeill, former president of Tesla, that’s due to a formula that is centered around innovation through subtraction and radically simplifying problems.

This includes steps like questioning every requirement, deleting every step possible in the process before building them back in, and automating workflows. We should expect to see Musk take a similar approach to government spending if he is appointed to his promised role, which would task him with conducting a “complete financial and performance audit of the entire federal government and making recommendations for drastic reforms,” according to comments made by Trump in September.

On Tuesday night, Musk said he would look to trim the fat of all government agencies, livestreaming a Q&A as he flew on a private jet from Texas to watch the election results with Trump at Mar-a-Lago.

“There’s a lot of duplicate responsibility where multiple agencies actually have overlapping portfolios,” Musk said. “There’s a lot of people that work for the government that we just need to transition them to more productive roles in the private sector.”

Musk noted that job cuts would be done “in a humane way” and floated the idea of paying government employees for two years while they searched for new jobs. He also mused about imposing term limits on bureaucrats.

“We still want to see regulations, they just need to be necessary,” he said. “I liken it to referees on a field. You don’t want to have no referees, but you don’t want to have more referees than players. That’s crazy.”

How an ‘EV mandate,’ or lack of one, could impact Tesla
Musk’s businesses have themselves received government assistance across numerous administrations. Most recently, Tesla benefitted from the Biden Administration’s Inflation Reduction Act, which provided hundreds of billions in subsidies for investing in renewable energy projects, as well as EV tax credits for buyers.

Tesla has earned more than $2 billion in 2024 from clear air credits that it sells to other automakers under Environmental Protection Agency rules.

Now Trump, who has talked previously about ending a non-existent “EV mandate,” is expected to roll back many of Biden’s EV policies. If he ends subsidies for EVs, that could be additional good news for Tesla given that many of its rivals are still trying to catch up to it.

“Tesla has the scale and scope that is unmatched in the EV industry and this dynamic could give Musk and Tesla a clear competitive advantage in a non-subsidy environment,” Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said.

Tesla stock is up almost 15% Wednesday.

Accelerating SpaceX’s mission to Mars
SpaceX stands to benefit from the Trump administration, too. During his first term, Trump enacted a number of major changes to American space policy, including standing up the U.S. Space Force and re-establishing the National Space Council for the first time in 24 years. There aren’t anticipated to be any major changes to America’s space priorities, especially its flagship program to return humans to the moon, Artemis. But the 2024 Republican Party platform included a clear, albeit brief, paragraph that space was a key emerging industry in which America should play a leading role: the country will send astronauts “back to the moon, and onward to Mars,” the document states.

In recent weeks, Trump has significantly upped his talk of space exploration. At an October 24 rally, he gave SpaceX’s crewed missions to Mars his blessing: “We will land an American astronaut on Mars. Thank you, Elon. Get going, get that spaceship going, Elon.” In a separate speech, he said he wanted “to reach Mars before the end of my term.”

The next Earth-Mars transfer window is in 2026, so an uncrewed mission to Mars could indeed take place before the end of this second Trump term. It’s likely no coincidence, given the time Musk and Trump spent together on the campaign trail, that this is the most recent timeline that Musk himself has given for SpaceX’s plans for the Red Planet: “The first Starships to Mars will launch in 2 years…If those landings go well, then the first crewed flights to Mars will be in 4 years,” he said on X.

Hitting those timelines could require changes within the Federal Aviation Administration, which regulates commercial launches in the United States. SpaceX has been waging an increasingly public war of words over the FAA’s purported inability to keep up with the pace of commercial innovation. The agency’s “superfluous” delays, as SpaceX put it in a recent blog post, could be a prime target for Musk’s proposed Department of Government Efficiency.

Musk isn’t the only space billionaire eager to make connections with the President: Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin welcomed a visit from Trump at the end of October. (On the same day, the Washington Post, owned by Bezos, announced it would not endorse a presidential candidate for the first time in the paper’s history.)

X and xAI
As for X, the Musk-owned social media platform, and xAI, his burgeoning AI company, the impacts of Trump’s win are less clear, though Musk has begun to speculate already on potential ripple effects.

More than 200 advertisers have stopped advertising on X since Musk took over, including Apple, Disney, IBM, Paramount, and Sony. Musk thinks that will change now that Trump has won the White House.

A recent global survey conducted by market research firm Kantar found that 26% of marketers plan to decrease spending on X in 2025 due to concerns that extreme content on the platform could damage their brands. Still, during Musk’s recent appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, he said, “I think if Trump wins, we’ll see probably most of the boycott lift.”

X has also been the focus of several federal investigations, including from the Federal Trade Commission, which has investigated the platform’s privacy practices under Musk, of whom FTC Chair Lina Khan has been openly critical. In late October, Musk said, “She will be fired soon.”

Musk has also gone head-to-head with the Securities and Exchange Commission over the years. Last year, the agency sued Musk and tried to subpoena him in relation to his purchase of Twitter stock and disclosures about his investment in the company. Musk called for a “comprehensive overhaul” of the SEC in response.

Meanwhile, Musk’s AI company, xAI, which is reportedly hoping to raise several billion dollars atop its recent $6 billion Series B at a $40 billion valuation – might benefit from a lack of AI regulation from the Trump administration. Experts say they expect a light-touch regulation approach from Trump, one where he relies on existing legislation rather than passing any new laws.

Matt Mittlesteadt, a research fellow at George Mason University, thinks the biggest impact to AI could come from trade policies. Trump has proposed a 10% tariff on all U.S. imports and 60% on Chinese-made products, which could have an economic impact on the AI sector.

TechCrunch : OpenAI acquired Chat.com fo $15.5m

OpenAI bought Chat.com, adding to its collection of high-profile domain names.

As of this morning, Chat.com now redirects to OpenAI’s AI-powered chatbot, ChatGPT. An OpenAI spokesperson confirmed the acquisition via email.

Chat.com is one of the older domains on the web, having been registered in September 1996. Last year, it was reported that Hubspot co-founder and CTO Dharmesh Shah acquired Chat.com for $15.5 million, making it one of the top two all-time publicly reported domain sales.

The domain name doesn’t appear to have changed hands since it sold last year, indicating that OpenAI isn’t hosting ChatGPT on Chat.com — so this probably doesn’t represent a brand change.