The Information : What a Wonder-Grubhub Deal Would Mean

What a Wonder-Grubhub Deal Would Mean

Wonderful news! Deals are happening. Exhibit A: Marc Lore’s food startup Wonder is close to a deal to buy Grubhub, The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday afternoon. That’s an intriguing acquisition for Lore, a veteran e-commerce entrepreneur, as it’s something of a change in direction.

Those with long memories of Wonder will recall that the startup began life as a mobile kitchen and food-delivery startup, using custom-made vans to park in people’s driveways and cook meals based on celebrity chef recipes. That rather ambitious strategy proved too much even for Lore, a master salesperson, who two years ago laid off staff and pivoted to operating restaurants that doubled as kitchens preparing meals for delivery.

Wonder’s special sauce, you might say, is that it lets people choose from lots of different cuisines when they order, which Wonder makes in its kitchens. So Wonder is already in the restaurant-delivery market, but not in a way that directly competes with DoorDash or UberEats, which handle delivery for restaurants of any kind. Buying Grubhub would drastically change that situation, pitting Wonder against much bigger and more prosperous rivals.

Of course, Wonder hasn’t confirmed the deal, and without details we don’t exactly know how it will work. But you can bet that Lore has found his brand of bespoke meals—albeit based on the cooking of famous chefs—wasn’t proving compelling enough for customers who can choose from any restaurant. Whether a Grubhub purchase will make a difference, though, is a big gamble.

After all, Grubhub doesn’t appear to have been doing that well. It has been owned for the past three years by European delivery firm Just Eat Takeaway, which paid $7.3 billion in stock for the company in 2021. But for two of those three years, Just Eat Takeaway has been trying to sell it. You can’t blame the Europeans for the quick change of mind: Just Eat Takeaway quickly began seeing declining sales in North America—Grubhub’s home.

And those declines haven’t finished. In quarterly financial updates, Just Eat Takeaway has preferred to highlight its growth excluding North America. In the third quarter of this year, it reported an 11% decline in orders in North America, which followed a 9% decline in the first half. Grubhub was also burning cash as of the first half, Just Eat Takeaway said.

The Journal report said Grubhub would fetch less than $1 billion, a massive loss on what Just Eat Takeaway paid. The only bright spot for Lore might be a recently expanded deal between Amazon and Grubhub, which lets Amazon customers order from Grubhub on Amazon. Wonder just hired Amazon’s grocery chief, Tony Hoggett, further cementing ties.

Lore, of course, has a history with Amazon, having sold his Diapers.com startup to Amazon more than a decade ago. You have to wonder whether he will end up selling Wonder to Amazon, particularly if a Trump administration relaxes antitrust guidelines as much as people hope. This is one deal that’s worth watching over a good meal.

The Information : How Elon Musk’s Supercomputer Freaked Out AI Rivals

How Elon Musk’s Supercomputer Freaked Out AI Rivals
Elon Musk has stunned rivals by building a supercomputer for xAI bigger and faster than ever before, fueling a race to supersize data centers by OpenAI and others.

The Takeaway
Elon Musk has managed to create a giant supercomputer for xAI in record time by disregarding some of the customary methods and precautions companies use to build data centers.

On a sunny day last month, a propeller plane made multiple passes in the air over a large industrial building surrounded by grassy fields near downtown Memphis, Tenn., as its passengers snapped photographs and videos of the facility.

It was a secret reconnaissance mission. Elon Musk had recently converted the building from a former manufacturing plant for home appliances into a data center that housed one of the largest clusters of servers in the world for training artificial intelligence models. The speed with which Musk had built that AI supercomputer for his latest startup, xAI, had sparked anxiety and confusion among leaders at rivals such as OpenAI.

The passengers on the plane—employees of a data center competitor—were attempting to gain whatever insights they could about the operations of the closely guarded facility, according to someone with direct knowledge of the flight and photos viewed by The Information. They took note of the bevy of gas-powered turbines Musk had trucked in to provide the facility with power, and they looked for clues about how xAI was controlling the heat put out by the servers inside the building, the person said.

The spy plane in Memphis is one sign of the high stakes involved in one of the most expensive races in the history of technology. Microsoft, Meta Platforms, Google and Amazon are each pouring tens of billions of dollars into new data centers to power the advanced new forms of AI that undergird ChatGPT and other applications.

It’s a risky bet based on a simple belief that the bigger a cluster of servers is, the better the AI it can produce. The scramble to supersize those clusters began in late 2022 with OpenAI’s launch of ChatGPT, the chatbot whose popularity sent shock waves across the tech industry.

Musk—who co-founded and initially funded OpenAI but later split from it—joined the data center race after it had already started. But through a combination of ambition, indefatigability and disregard for some of the conventional methods of building data centers, he has still managed to make a major splash.

Two things about Musk’s supercomputer have jolted competitors: its size and the speed with which xAI built it. The supercomputer, fittingly known as Colossus, consists of 100,000 graphics processing units, the chips best suited to training and running AI software. That is several times bigger than similar supercomputers built in the past by Meta and other tech giants.

Stringing together so many GPUs into a single supercomputer isn’t as simple as it sounds because of how much power the servers consume and bottlenecks in the networking equipment used to connect the chips to each other. And completing the project as quickly as xAI did is unheard of.

Musk and Nvidia, the AI chip powerhouse that supplied the GPUs for Colossus, said the data center and supercomputer were built in just 122 days. On a recent podcast, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said a GPU cluster of that size would normally take three years to plan and design and an additional year to get working.

“No question that nobody slept,” Huang said of the Colossus project on a recent podcast.

“As far as I know, there’s only one person in the world who could do that,” Huang added. “Elon is singular in this understanding of engineering and construction and large systems and marshaling resources.”

Musk appears to have built the Memphis data center so quickly in part by cutting a few key corners—for example, by moving forward without having secured enough power from the electric grid to run Colossus. But defying such norms is part of the playbook Musk has used again and again at his other companies.

At Tesla, for example, he once sidestepped the need for permits to expand a car factory in California by setting up an assembly line in a parking lot for its Model 3 vehicle. And at SpaceX, he constantly pushes engineers to get rid of parts on its rockets that he views as unnecessary or to use cheaper components that were not designed for space applications.

Even though xAI’s AI tools are still far behind those of OpenAI, the speed with which he built his supercomputer raised alarms with Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO. After Musk posted on X about it, Altman got into an argument with infrastructure executives at Microsoft, telling them he was concerned xAI was moving faster than Microsoft, according to a person who heard his remarks.

He worried that xAI could soon have a more powerful supercomputer than OpenAI did. That concern has prompted OpenAI to seek alternatives to Microsoft for the first time.

Right now, one of those alternatives is under construction along a dusty stretch of flat land in Abilene, Texas, roughly three hours west of Dallas, where a group of companies is preparing the site for a data center that will eventually house a 100,000-chip cluster for OpenAI next year.

Construction at the site is moving quickly. On a recent tour, a guide who worked for one of the project’s contractors pointed out how most of the buildings don’t yet have walls on all of their sides. The contractors are building most of the facility’s components off-site so that they can install parts quickly when they arrive.

It may not be long before even the supercomputers in Abilene and Memphis look relatively small. Some big tech companies, including Microsoft, have discussed data center projects that would contain millions of GPUs and cost more than $100 billion each.

The one-upmanship is likely to continue, as nearly everyone in the data center business is keeping close tabs on what their competitors are up to.

“The data center market is very small, and everybody is paying attention to what is going on,” said John Arcello, who leads the advanced data center team at DPR Construction, which builds data centers for large companies including Meta and is working on the Abilene project.

‘Gigafactory of Compute’

Early this year, Musk began putting together the computing horsepower he needed to build xAI, a company he had founded in 2023 as a serious contender in AI. At the time, he was already renting GPUs from Oracle to train the initial version of Grok, xAI’s large language model.

To improve Grok’s quality, he needed access to much more computing capacity. In May, he held a video call with prospective xAI investors as part of an effort to raise billions of dollars for the startup. He laid out a vision to them of building the world’s largest supercomputer, which he called the “gigafactory of compute”—a reference to Tesla’s gargantuan factories around the world—according to an investor who attended the meeting.

Huddled around a table with fewer than a dozen other xAI employees, Musk revealed his plan to connect 100,000 of Nvidia’s H100s—the most advanced GPUs from the company then on the market—into a single cluster. A chart on the screen said xAI would build its supercomputer in about one-fifth the time it would take most companies to do so.

One of the xAI slides said that the company was operating at “ludicrous speed” and promised that “Elon is personally responsible for delivering the data center on time.”

Musk told investors he hadn’t yet decided whether xAI would partner with a cloud provider on the project or proceed on its own.

A few weeks later, a handful of Oracle executives logged onto a video meeting with Musk to discuss the first option. Musk proposed that Oracle—whose founder, Larry Ellison, is a close friend of Musk—build xAI’s supercomputer, which would have made the AI startup one of Oracle’s largest customers, The Information previously reported.

Musk wanted the xAI data center to be located in a former Electrolux appliance manufacturing facility in Memphis, and he wanted it done by fall 2024. But on the call, Oracle executives told Musk they didn’t think they could build it as quickly as he was demanding, according to someone who attended the meeting.

Oracle staff noted that the building Musk wanted to use didn’t have access to enough power to support the number of chips he wanted Oracle to put in it, the person said. Musk quickly grew frustrated with the pushback from the Oracle executives.

Ultimately Musk decided xAI would work on the Memphis data center without Oracle.

“Oracle is a great company…but, when our fate depends on being the fastest by far, we must have our own hands on the steering wheel, rather than be a backseat driver,” he said on X, following publication of a story in The Information about how the talks broke down.

Power Plans

To meet his aggressive timeline, Musk pushed local officials in Memphis to approve the data center in record time. Luckily for xAI, Memphis was eager to give him what he wanted so the city could attract his business.

“We worked even longer hours, took every text and phone call at any hour of the day so that we were reflecting this sense of drive that matches this company and its expectations,” Ted Townsend, chair of the Greater Memphis Chamber, told the Daily Memphian.

In early June, Townsend announced publicly that Musk had picked Memphis as the location for xAI’s supercomputer.

Over the next few weeks, Musk and his team at xAI gutted the Memphis manufacturing facility to make room for rows and rows of racks that would house the Nvidia GPUs. They set up electrical, mechanical and plumbing equipment and installed a water cooling system for the servers.

One major hitch for Musk’s breakneck construction schedule could have been electrical power. Initially, there wasn’t enough of it at the Memphis site for all of xAI’s power-hungry GPUs. Normally, that’s the kind of problem that could derail or delay a data center project.

But Musk came up with a stopgap solution: He brought in mobile, natural gas–powered turbines to provide supplemental power while he waited for local authorities to approve a request for an additional 100 megawatts of power at the site. The Tennessee Valley Authority agreed to that request last week.

Musk’s move prompted immediate pushback from a coalition of local environmental groups, who wrote to the local health department that xAI was polluting the air by operating gas combustion turbines without permits. An executive who works on data centers at Microsoft said there’s no way the company would have been able to do something similar, given its climate goals and initiatives.

“To have basically an un-permitted power plant come in and set up shop is alarming and really disrespectful to the community,” said Amanda Garcia, a senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center, which opposed the Tennesse Valley Authority’s decision. “Air pollution is a huge challenge in southwest Memphis.”

Other factors likely helped Musk finish the project quickly. For example, executives in the data center business said Colossus almost certainly didn’t have to undergo and pass any compliance tests before xAI could start using the cluster. That’s mainly because xAI was planning to use the supercomputer for its own needs rather than renting it out to other clients.

In contrast, Microsoft has to undergo several data security tests before handing over servers to OpenAI or other Azure cloud customers, who expect a certain level of uptime or privacy standards, according to someone with direct knowledge of the process.

“We have all these different industry certifications that we have to pass,” said Raul Martynek, CEO of data center operator DataBank. “I’ll guarantee you the [xAI] data center can’t pass those types of things.”

Musk’s effort to stand up Colossus has encountered a fair amount of skepticism. Several data center executives said it is extremely difficult to retrofit buildings, such as manufacturing plants, for GPU servers and liquid cooling systems. Over the past few months, the data center has experienced outages, according to two people who have spoken with xAI employees.

The problems haven't appeared to slow xAI down. Musk and Nvidia have said they started the first training run for the next Grok model only 19 days after they brought the first server rack into the data center.

In a recent interview, Antonio Gracias—a close friend of Musk’s and a longtime investor in his companies, including xAI—said xAI is rethinking the entire process of building data centers “from first principles and trying to make it cheaper, better, faster.

“I’ve seen this movie at Tesla, SpaceX, other companies, where it’s Elon, but it is also dozens of engineers being led in a mission to create the very best, most effective system possible,” he said.

Peer Pressure

As word of Musk’s supercomputer progress spread this summer, senior data center executives at Amazon, Microsoft and Google began calling staffers at Nvidia with versions of the same question: How was Musk able to move so quickly on his supercomputer?

Officials from some of these and other companies, including Meta, also called a small competing cloud provider to see whether the company could provide them with data center capacity faster than what they could build themselves, according to someone who spoke to the companies.

Their eagerness to unpack the mysteries of the project has only increased as more information about the Memphis data center has trickled out. Data center and cloud executives have closely studied images from the facility to see what they can glean about its design.

Musk has published several photos from inside the data center on X. And last month, a blogger published a video on YouTube after taking a tour of the Colossus data center (the video, an unusual peek behind the curtain of the facility, was sponsored by Super Micro Computer, which supplied some of the data center servers to Musk).

Meanwhile, Oracle—xAI’s would-be partner on the Memphis project—signed its deal to provide computing capacity to OpenAI not long after the talks with xAI broke down over the summer. The Information was first to report that the new OpenAI data center would be located in Abilene, where Oracle had signed an agreement to work with startups Crusoe and Lancium to develop the site.

Last month, Crusoe raised more than $3 billion to develop the initial phase of the data center, which will contain 100,000 of Nvidia’s forthcoming GPUs, known as GB200s.

As Musk did in Memphis, Crusoe is pushing to get the project done quickly. Arcello from DPR, whose firm is contracting with Crusoe on the project, said it’s one of the fastest builds he’s ever worked on. The firms began discussing the data center design in March and broke ground on the project in June.

A few weeks ago, construction crews at the Abilene site were busy cutting down trees to make room for a new electrical substation and pouring as much concrete as they could truck in on a daily basis. OpenAI has asked its partners on the project to consider using gas turbines in case there are any issues getting power to the site on time, according to three people with direct knowledge of the request.

On a recent tour at the site, a guide was asked why there was so much fuss about building the data center so quickly.

“Whoever can get their [supercomputer] faster…could pretty much rule the world,” the guide said.

FT : BioNTech strikes $950mn deal for Chinese drugmaker Biotheus

BioNTech strikes $950mn deal for Chinese drugmaker Biotheus
Acquisition is latest example of western drugmakers turning to China to tap innovation

BioNTech has acquired Chinese cancer drugmaker Biotheus in a near $1bn deal, as the Covid-19 vaccine maker taps into the country’s health sciences expertise to develop promising immunotherapy drugs.

The deal gives the German biotech control of a drug class that has shown potential to outperform Merck’s blockbuster cancer treatment Keytruda, the best-selling drug globally in 2023 with $25bn in sales.

BioNTech will make $800mn in upfront payments to Biotheus, a drugmaker based in Guangdong province, with milestone payments of up to $150mn.

Uğur Şahin, chief executive of BioNTech, said the company believed that the Biotheus drug “has the potential to set a new standard of care in multiple oncology indications”.

The acquisition is the latest example of western drugmakers turning to Chinese companies to tap into innovation, often at lower cost. 

Merck, GSK and AstraZeneca all struck licensing deals in the country last year, as part of a record $44.1bn of annual investment in Chinese biotechs, according to UBS research.

But the deal comes as the challenges of doing business in China have become more apparent for pharmaceutical companies.

AstraZeneca’s China president and former and current executives have been detained in cases allegedly involving the illegal importation of cancer drugs, while the US is moving to restrict collaboration between American pharmaceutical and biotech companies and key Chinese drug manufacturers through the Biosecure Act. 

BioNTech is using its windfall from the Covid-19 vaccine that it produced with Pfizer to establish itself as an oncology specialist. It is making large investments in clinical trials to develop a portfolio of cancer vaccines and “antibody drug conjugates”, a targeted form of chemotherapy.

But it has yet to develop a clinically approved drug beyond its Covid-19 vaccine. Şahin previously told the Financial Times that it hoped to launch its first cancer treatment by 2026. 

The company had previously reached a $55mn licensing deal with Biotheus but by acquiring the company, it will have full control over its BNT327/PM8002 drug, which it will advance through late-stage clinical trials in lung and breast cancers, the company said.

Keytruda has been approved in 40 different treatment areas. It is a type of drug known as a “checkpoint inhibitor”, which works by preventing cancer cells from disabling the immune system, allowing it to recognise and destroy tumour cells.

New drugs such as BioNTech’s newly acquired BNT327/PM8002 add a component that tackles VEGF, or vascular endothelial growth factor, which promotes tumour growth.

Shares in Summit Therapeutics, a US biotechnology company, rose from $12 to over $30 in September after it published data showing that its PDL-1-VEGF drug outperformed Keytruda in treating lung cancer. 

BioNTech shares rose almost 40 per cent after Summit’s data was published, with investors assessing its drug as one of the most promising candidates in the field.

>>> US Gapping Up / Gapping Down

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance:

DAVE +33.5%, RKLB +28% (also signs multi-launch agreement with satellite operator; also awarded a federal defense contract), PAY +25.1%, RSKD +17%, CAVA +16.6%, HNST +16.5%, NTRA +12.9%, FNA +12%, MRSN +10.9%, RDCM +10.7%, DNA +10.4%, SSYS +9.2%, CAE +8.6% (also CEO to step down), SPOT +8.3%, TSEM +8%, FIHL +7.8%, CYBR +7.8%, AMBC +7.7% (also authorizes new $50 mln share repurchase program), RPAY +7.5%, HBM +5.6%, NPCE +4.9%, FLUT +4.8%, PRDO +4.6%, CRNX +4.2% (also to showcase pipeline advancements), PUBM +3.4%, SDRL +3.4%, DHT +2.8%, ICUI +2.8% (also creates joint venture), SU +2.3%, RXT +2.1%, MODG +1.7%, HUT +1.6%, BHVN +1.5%, CNC +1.5%,
Other news:

SPIR +18.8% (announces strategic business update; debt to be eliminated)
HNRG +18% (signs term sheet with data center developer to supply power for 10+ years; also reports earnings)
DSP +17.2% (acquires IRIS.TV)
RIVN +9.4% (RIVN and Volkswagen (VWAGY) to launch joint venture)
MRVI +7.4% (Exec Chairman disclosed the purchase of 175,000 shares)
IMUX +4.3% ( publication of data From Phase 1/1b clinical trial of IMU-856 in the peer reviewed journal, The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology)
IONQ +3.2% (issued 5 new patents)
AB +2% (reports Oct AUM)
AMGN +1.7% (issues statement on MariTide Phase 1 data)
MESO +1.3% (filed a new issue announcement)
ORA +1.1% (to sign $200 mln contract for New Zealand plant)
Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance:

CHGG -16.4% (also undertakes additional restructuring, $300 mln increase to securities repurchase program), PGNY -14.2%, ZI -14%, SIBN -13.6%, RKT -12.3%, OABI -11.1%, RUM -10.7%, PSFE -9.3%, MARA -8.6%, IAS -7.6%, CART -6.5%, LIF -6.4%, PLUS -6.3%, SWKS -6.2%, SOUN -6.1%, LNW -5.6%, DOX -5.1%, PRTA -3.5%, MTTR -2.7%, QXO -2.7%, WULF -1.9%, CNNE -1.5%, NVEI -1%, MLR -0.8%
Other news:

SAVE -71.6% (moving toward bankruptcy after merger talks with ULCC break down, according to WSJ; files Form 12b-25; unable to file 10-Q; provides operating metrics update)
GRPN -20.7% (negotiates with convertible notes holders; also reported Q3 results)
SGMO -10% (files $500 mixed shelf securities offering)
GDYN -6.9% (prices offering of 5.75 mln shares of common stock at $17.25 per share)
VVX -5.8% (prices secondary offering of 2.5 mln shares of common stock at $61.00 per share)
ETNB -3.9% (prices upsized $125.0 mln offering consisting of common stock and warrants)
SMCI -2.8% (files to delay its 10-Q)
HQY -2.2% (CEO to retire, names new CEO)
SHOP -1.9% (files mixed shelf securities offering)
MIST -1.6% (files $250 mln mixed shelf securities offering)
OS -1.5% (15 mln share offering)

>>> US Research Calls

Research Calls I

Upgrades:
BankUnited (BKU) upgraded to Overweight from Equal Weight at Wells Fargo; tgt raised to $48
BASF AG (BASFY) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Jefferies
CCC Intelligent Solutions (CCCS) upgraded to Overweight from Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; tgt raised to $15
Cummins (CMI) upgraded to Outperform from In-line at Evercore ISI; tgt raised to $408
Equity Residential (EQR) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Stifel; tgt raised to $81.50
Downgrades:
Angi Inc. (ANGI) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup; tgt lowered to $2
Angi Inc. (ANGI) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman; tgt lowered to $2.50
BioAtla (BCAB) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at H.C. Wainwright
Camden Property (CPT) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Stifel; tgt raised to $121
CareCloud (CCLD) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at ROTH MKM; tgt lowered to $3.50
Caterpillar (CAT) downgraded to Underperform from In-line at Evercore ISI; tgt raised to $365
Coty (COTY) downgraded to Hold from Buy at TD Cowen; tgt lowered to $8.50
Doximity (DOCS) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Canaccord Genuity; tgt raised to $60
Eaton (ETN) downgraded to In-line from Outperform at Evercore ISI; tgt raised to $389
ESAB Corp. (ESAB) downgraded to Underperform from In-line at Evercore ISI; tgt raised to $122
Illinois Tool (ITW) downgraded to Underperform from In-line at Evercore ISI; tgt raised to $255
Int'l Paper (IP) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at Exane BNP Paribas; tgt $48.20
Others:
Airship AI Holdings (AISP) initiated with a Buy at The Benchmark Company; tgt $6
America's Car-Mart (CRMT) initiated with an Equal-Weight at Stephens; tgt $50
Atlanticus (ATLC) initiated with an Overweight at Stephens; tgt $54
Axalta Coating Systems (AXTA) initiated with an Outperform at Evercore ISI; tgt $47
Commvault Systems (CVLT) initiated with an Outperform at Oppenheimer; tgt $200
Credit Acceptance Corp. (CACC) initiated with an Equal-Weight at Stephens; tgt $452
Dover (DOV) initiated with a Neutral at UBS; tgt $217
Emerson (EMR) initiated with an Outperform at Exane BNP Paribas; tgt $155
Enova International (ENVA) initiated with an Overweight at Stephens; tgt $108
EZCORP (EZPW) initiated with an Equal-Weight at Stephens; tgt $13
FirstCash (FCFS) initiated with an Overweight at Stephens; tgt $137
Fortive (FTV) initiated with a Neutral at UBS; tgt $84
Jumia (JMIA) initiated with a Sector Perform at RBC Capital Mkts; tgt $5
Katapult Group (KPLT) initiated with an Equal-Weight at Stephens; tgt $9
Opus Genetics (IRD) resumed with a Buy at H.C. Wainwright; tgt $8

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

Gapping up:
DAVE +48.1%, RKLB +30.2%, PAY +24%, HNRG +16.7%, HNST +16.7%, NTRA +14.7%, DSP +14.6%, CAVA +14.5%, MLR +13.3%, RIVN +12.1%, FNA +12%, DNA +12%, MRVI +11.2%, AMBC +7.7%, SPOT +7.5%, RPAY +7.5%, MESO +7.4%, CAE +7.4%, FIHL +6.7%, HUT +6.2%, NPCE +4.9%, SDRL +4.8%, PRDO +4.6%, ICUI +4.5%, IMUX +4.3%, PUBM +3.3%, IONQ +3.2%, SSYS +3.1%, DHT +3%, AMGN +2.8%, LAZR +2.7%, RXT +2.4%, SU +2.2%, CNC +1.5%, EXAI +1.4%, GPI +1.2%, AER +1%, EXP +0.8%, ORA +0.8%, NATL +0.7%, OXY +0.7%
Gapping down:
SAVE -64.6%, GRPN -20.5%, SIBN -17.5%, CHGG -15.8%, ZI -14.7%, RKT -13.7%, PGNY -13%, SGMO -11.1%, OABI -11.1%, CART -9.1%, RUM -8.6%, IAS -7.6%, GDYN -7.2%, MARA -7.2%, SWKS -6.4%, LIF -6.4%, PLUS -6.3%, SOUN -6%, VVX -5.5%, DOX -5.1%, SMCI -4.6%, OS -4.4%, DOLE -3.9%, LNW -3.7%, PRTA -3.5%, AB -2.6%, ETNB -2.2%, SHOP -1.8%, MIST -1.6%, CRNX -1.6%, WULF -1.6%, UPST -1.5%, CNNE -1.5%, MTTR -1.4%, RXRX -1.1%, RGEN -1%, VKTX -1%, NVEI -1%

TechCrunch : Snowflake hackers identified and charged with stealing 50 billion A

Snowflake hackers identified and charged with stealing 50 billion AT&T records

The U.S. government has accused Connor Moucka and John Binns of being the hackers who broke into the systems of AT&T, stealing around 50 billion customer call and text records.

In July, AT&T said hackers stole the phone records of “nearly all” of its cellular and landline customers, as well as calls and text message records — such as who contacted whom by phone or text — but not the content of the messages. At the time, AT&T said it would notify around 110 million AT&T customers of the breach, and that the records were stolen from its systems hosted on Snowflake, a provider of cloud services for data analysis.

Until the Department of Justice’s indictment against the two hackers, which was filed on Sunday, the total number of stolen AT&T customer records was unknown.

The document does not mention AT&T. Instead, it mentions “Victim-2,” describing it as “a major telecommunications company located in the United States,” which was breached around April 14. When AT&T previously confirmed it was breached, it said the company learned of the hack on April 19. This means that both the description of what kind of company Victim-2 is, and the dates of its breach, align with what AT&T had publicly disclosed, making it almost certain that Victim-2 is indeed AT&T.

AT&T did not respond to a request for comment.

DOJ spokesperson Emily Langlie declined to comment.

Overall, according to the indictment, Moucka and Binns accessed “billions of sensitive customer records,” and were successful in extorting at least three victims of at least 36 bitcoin (around $2.5 million when the victims paid) over a span of almost a year, from around November 2023, until October 10 of this year.

Prosecutors say Moucka, who lived in Canada, is also known online as “judische,” “catist,” “waif,” and “cllyels,” and Binns, who lived in Turkey, was known as “irdev”and “j_irdev1337.” Moucka was arrested in Canada last week. Binns was previously arrested in Turkey, according to 404 Media.

In August, Binns took credit for the AT&T breach with The Wall Street Journal. Moucka, through his moniker “Judische,” told 404 Media that he thought he’d be arrested soon.

AT&T is just one of several victims who had sensitive data stolen from their Snowflake instances. Over the last months, hackers also broke into Santander Bank, Ticketmaster, and around 165 other corporate customers. All these companies use Snowflake.

Prosecutors alleged that by breaking into the victim companies’ Snowflake instances, the hackers stole troves of sensitive personal and corporate data, including social security numbers, driver’s license numbers, passport numbers, and banking information, which makes these Snowflake-related breaches some of the worst cyberattacks of the year. In some cases, the hackers also asked victims for a ransom by threatening them with leaking the stolen information, threats that they followed up on at times.

Wired previously reported that AT&T paid a hacker $370,000 in an attempt to get them to delete the stolen records. Prosecutors said in the indictment that Victim-2 paid a ransom to the hackers.

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 13th of November 2024 V2(+)

>>> Up
* Air Liquide Raised to Buy at Jefferies; PT 190 euros
* AstraZeneca Raised to Buy at Nordea; PT 11,253.71 pence
* AstraZeneca Raised to Buy at Intron Health; PT 120 pence
* Axway Software Raised to Buy at Kepler Cheuvreux; PT 33 euros (+)
* BASF Raised to Buy at Jefferies; PT 53 euros
* Berkeley Raised to Buy at Investec; PT 4,700 pence (+)
* Bristol Myers Raised to Outperform at Daiwa; PT $65
* Barclays Strategists Say European Profit Downgrades May Moderate (+)
* De' Longhi Raised to Buy at Intesa Sanpaolo; PT 35.50 euros (+)
* Endesa Raised to Buy at HSBC; PT 24.20 euros
* FLEX LNG Raised to Buy at Fearnley; PT 320 kroner (+)
* Holcim PT Raised to 110 Swiss francs at Oddo BHF
* Ibstock Raised to Buy at Deutsche Bank (+)
* Siemens Energy PT Raised to 47 euros at Kepler Cheuvreux
* Spectris Raised to Neutral at Davy; PT 2,650 pence (+)
* Springvest Raised to Accumulate at Inderes; PT 8.50 euros
* Swiss Life Raised to Outperform at KBW; PT 790 Swiss francs
* Systemair Raised to Buy at Nordea; PT 110 kronor
* Taylor Wimpey Raised to Buy at Investec; PT 153 pence (+)
* Vitec Software Group Raised to Buy at ABG; PT 575 kronor

>>> Down
* Ageas Cut to Market Perform at KBW; PT 50 euros
* Baloise Cut to Market Perform at KBW; PT 159 Swiss francs
* Bechtle Cut to Hold at Kepler Cheuvreux (+)
* Brenntag Cut to Neutral at Citi; PT 58 euros
* Deutsche Post Cut to Equal-Weight at Barclays; PT 37.50 euros
* DS Smith Cut to Underperform at BNPP Exane; PT 480 pence (+)
* Evonik Cut to Underperform at Jefferies; PT 16.60 euros cut from 21 euros
* FLEX LNG Cut to Hold at Pareto Securities; PT 276 kroner
* I-RES Cut to Equal-Weight at Barclays; PT 90 euro cents
* Jenoptik Cut to Hold at Hauck & Aufhaeuser; PT 20.60 euros (+)
* K+S Cut to Underperform at Jefferies; PT 8 euros
* Neste Cut to Neutral at Grupo Santander; PT 15 euros
* Serco Cut to Hold at Shore Capital
* SoftwareONE Cut to Hold at Kepler Cheuvreux (+)
* Spirit Air PT Cut to $1 from $2 at TD Cowen (+)
* Storebrand Cut to Underperform at KBW; PT 99 kroner
* Symrise Cut to Hold at Jefferies; PT 120 euros
* Tesla Cut to Sell at Phillip Secs; PT $230 (+)

>>> Initiation
* Computacenter Rated New Buy at Kepler Cheuvreux; PT 2,500 pence (+)
* Monte Paschi Reinstated Buy at HSBC; PT 7.20 euros
* Softcat Rated New Reduce at Kepler Cheuvreux; PT 1,550 pence (+)

>>> Call
* Barclays Strategists Say European Profit Downgrades May Moderate (+)

>>> Stoxx 600 Pre-Market Indications

  • Just Eat Takeaway (T5W TH) +13%
    • Just Eat Takeaway.com Sells GrubHub for Ent. Value of $650M
  • Siemens Energy (ENR TH) +7.6%
    • Siemens Energy Mid-Term Targets Seen as Positive: Street Wrap
  • RWE (RWE TH) +4.6%
    • RWE Plans €1.5 Billion Buyback as US Politics Cloud Investments
  • Rolls-Royce (RRU TH) +2.1%
    • Rolls-Royce Moves to Placate Airlines With Trent 1000 Task Force
  • Allianz (ALV TH) +1.7%
    • Allianz Sees Profit at Top of Forecast After Strong Quarter (1)
  • Legal & General (LGI TH) +1.3%
  • Air Liquide (AIL TH) +1.3%
  • BASF (BAS TH) +1.2%
  • Deutsche Post (DHL TH) -1.2%
    • Deutsche Post Cut to Equal-Weight at Barclays; PT 37.50 euros
  • Verbund (OEWA TH) -1.3%
  • Dassault Systemes (DSYA TH) -1.3%
  • Diageo (GUI TH) -1.3%
  • Repsol (REP TH) -1.4%
  • Qiagen (QIA TH) -1.8%
  • Bechtle (BC8 TH) -2%
    • Bechtle Cut to Hold at Kepler Cheuvreux
  • Ageas (FO4N TH) -2.6%
    • Ageas Cut to Market Perform at KBW; PT 50 euros
  • Evonik (EVK TH) -2.9%
    • Evonik Cut to Underperform at Jefferies; PT 16.60 euros
  • K+S (SDF TH) -3.3%
    • K+S Cut to Underperform at Jefferies; PT 8 euros