>>> US After Hours Summary: PVH +15.8% up big on earnings and repurchase plan;

After Hours Summary: PVH +15.8% up big on earnings and repurchase plan; LPRO -12.3% falls on quarterly results and new CEO announcement

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: MVST +34.2%, PVH +15.8% (also to enter $500 mln ASR), PRGS +7.8% (also names new CEO and COO and files mixed shelf offering)

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: JACK +2.8% (names new CEO), EL +1.4% (to face lawsuit over sales in China, according to Reuters), HI +0.4% (completes sale of Majority Stake in Milacron injection molding and extrusion business for $287 mln), DUK +0.3% (nuclear plant receives approval to extent operations), FCX +0.3% (Q1 operational update), BA +0.2% awarded $2.46 bln U.S. Air Force contract mod), FLR +0.1% (awarded construction contract), FMC +0.1% (agreement with Bayer to commercialize products containing Isoflex active in EU and Great Britain), STM +0.1% (sign GaN agreement with Innoscience), LMT +0.1% (awarded $600 mln U.S. Air Force contract mod)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: LPRO -12.3%, CELC -5.5%, VATE -5%, RCAT -1.7%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: EE -6.5% ($150 mln stock offering), DBVT -2.5% (to delay 10-K filing), CWAN -2% (stock offerings), TKR -1.5% (CEO departing; names interim CEO), BIGC -1% (CTO departing), LYV -0.9% (down on Trump possibly signing EO targeting scalping, according to Reuters), BMA -0.4% (appoints new CEO), CACI -0.2% (cooperative R&D agreement with U.S. Military Academy), ARDT -0.1% (appoints new COO), VAL -0.1% ($352 mln contract for drillship)

>>> US Close Dow +1% S&P +0.55% Nasdaq -0.14% Russell -0.56%

Closing Stock Market Summary
The S&P 500 (+0.6%) and Dow Jones Industrial Average (+1.0%) closed at or near highs after rebounding off early session lows. The Nasdaq Composite (-0.1%) also staged a rebound after trading down as much as 2.7% at its low, but still settled slightly below Friday's close.

The initial decline in equities reflected some hesitation about Wednesday's implementation of reciprocal tariffs. Headlines over the weekend impacted investors' sentiment after reports that the Trump administration is considering broader tariffs on April 2, including a 20% universal tariff on all imports from all countries.

The news also sparked some safe-haven buying in Treasuries, which dissipated as selling eased in equities. The 10-yr yield settled one basis point lower at 4.25% after hitting 4.19% earlier. The 2-yr yield settled unchanged at 3.91% after hitting 3.85%.

Many stocks participated in the recovery efforts, leading the equal weighted S&P 500 to close 0.8% higher. Mega cap shares were largely left out of the improvement. NVIDIA (NVDA 108.38, -1.29, -1.2%), Microsoft (MSFT 375.39, -3.41, -0.9%), Amazon.com (AMZN 190.26, -2.46, -1.3%), and Tesla (TSLA 259.16, -4.39, -1.7%) were influential losers from the space.

The price action in AMZN and TSLA pinned the consumer discretionary sector in negative territory, down 0.2% from Friday.
The remaining ten sectors registered gains led by consumer staples (+1.6%) and financials (+1.3%).
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: -1.3% YTD
  • S&P 500: -4.6% YTD
  • S&P Midcap 400: -6.5% YTD
  • Russell 2000: -9.8% YTD
  • Nasdaq Composite: -10.4% YTD

Reviewing today's economic data:
  • March Chicago PMI 47.6 vs. 45.3 consensus; prior revised to 45.0 from 45.5

Looking ahead to Tuesday, market participants receive the following data:
  • 9:45 ET: Final March S&P Global U.S. Manufacturing PMI (prior 49.8)
  • 10:00 ET: February Construction Spending (consensus 0.4%; prior -0.2%), February job openings (prior 7.740 mln), and March ISM Manufacturing Index (consensus 49.8%; prior 50.3%)

>>> DBV Technologies to delay 10-K filing

DBV Technologies to delay 10-K filing (6.82 +0.62)
  • The Registrant has been delayed in completing the preparation of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (the "Form 10-K"). The Registrant has been working to secure financing through a private placement to fund the continued development of the Viaskin Peanut program to finance the preparation and submission of the Biologics License Application ("BLA") and to finance the launch readiness and commercialization preparation of Viaskin Peanut in the United States (the "Financing"), as detailed in the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-36697) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on March 31, 2025.
  • The Registrant has spent a considerable amount of time and effort on discussions and negotiations with respect to the Financing. In addition, the Registrant is currently assessing the impact that the Financing will have on the disclosures in the Form 10-K regarding the adequacy of its liquidity for the next twelve months as required by generally accepted accounting principles and SEC disclosure requirements.
  • These discussions, negotiations and assessments have diverted significant management time and resources from the Company's processes for reviewing and completing its financial statements and related disclosures in a manner that would permit timely filing of the Form 10-K without unreasonable effort or expense. As such, the Registrant's auditors have not yet been able to complete their review of the Form 10-K.

Reuters - Estee Lauder faces US legal challenge over China sales practices

Estee Lauder faces US legal challenge over China sales practices
  • Judge finds omissions, half-truths in Estee disclosures
  • Estee said to conceal impact of gray market crackdown
  • Estee not immediately available for comment


NEW YORK, March 31 (Reuters) - Estee Lauder (EL.N), opens new tab must face a lawsuit accusing the cosmetic giant of defrauding shareholders by concealing its overdependence on improper gray-market sales in China, a federal judge in Manhattan ruled on Monday.

U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian said shareholders identified "several misleading omissions" and "half-truths" in Estee disclosures, related to the negative sales impact from a January 2022 government crackdown on the "daigou" gray market.

Shareholders in the proposed class action said Estee became dependent in China on "daigou," or duty-free purchases by resellers, after the COVID-19 pandemic began, especially in the Hainan province.

They said the New York-based company concealed the truth about how the crackdown was hurting sales until November 1, 2023, causing its shares to plunge 19% and wiping out about $8.7 billion of market value.

"Defendants attributed the decline to everything but the crackdown and reassured investors that an upswing was coming soon," Subramanian wrote.

"What matters is that Estée Lauder touted the reasons for its success while leaving out the parts of the truth it found inconvenient," he continued. "The telling of half-truths -- that's what the securities laws don't tolerate."

The Estee defendants also include former Chief Executive Fabrizio Freda and former Chief Financial Officer Tracey Travis.

Estee and lawyers for the defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

In seeking a dismissal, the defendants said there was neither proof of fraudulent intent, nor a showing that legally actionable false statements caused shareholder losses.

But the judge said Freda and Travis should have been able to pinpoint the "daigou" crackdown as a major cause of falling sales, cited accusations about their attentiveness to sales data and that Estee devoted an entire team to analyze "daigou" sales.

The proposed class action covers shareholders from February 3, 2022 to October 31, 2023.

Estee shares have lost nearly half their value since the latter date in part because of China, which accounted for about one-quarter of sales in 2024.

The case is In re Estee Lauder Co Securities Litigation decision, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 23-10669.

FT : Harrods offers alleged Mohamed Al Fayed victims up to £200,000 in damages

Harrods offers alleged Mohamed Al Fayed victims up to £200,000 in damages
Cap criticised by lawyers representing scores of women who say store’s late former owner sexually abused them

Harrods is offering up to £200,000 each to victims of alleged sexual abuse by the luxury department store’s late former owner Mohamed Al Fayed under a compensation scheme published on Monday.

Lawyers for the company at MPL Legal shared details of the settlement process following claims of sexual assault, including rape, against Al Fayed last year.

Victims stand to be paid general damages of up to £200,000, according to the documents. The scheme also allows for other types of claims, such as work impact payments of up to £150,000 for loss of employment opportunities resulting from sexual assault. Individuals can apply for more than one form of compensation.

Details of the scheme come six months after the BBC broadcast allegations about Al Fayed, who died in 2023 aged 94. The Egyptian businessman owned and controlled Harrods between 1985 and 2010, when he sold it to a Qatari sovereign wealth fund.

Lawyers for alleged victims gave a mixed response to the settlement scheme.

Richard Meeran, partner at Leigh Day, which represents 27 women, acknowledged the scheme “may be a preferable option for many”. However, he said “it seems that Harrods hopes to avoid the scrutiny of court litigation and prolonged ongoing reputational damage”.

KP Law, which is representing more than 260 women, said Harrods had not listened to its feedback on the scheme and that there were “serious concerns about its adequacy and fairness”.

The firm criticised the cap on damages, and claimed that documentation requirements were “overly intrusive”. It also said the scheme “fails to reflect [the] individual complexities” of each person’s experience.

Lawyers at Irwin Mitchell, representing a number of alleged victims including former Harrods employees, said “it could be argued that the scheme doesn’t quite go far enough to reflect the gravity of what happened here, with some of the damages payments remaining low and narrow in scope”. However, it added, “we do cautiously welcome the scheme”.

Victims can still take Harrods to court if they decide the settlement scheme is not suitable for them.

Harrods, which is funding the scheme and has apologised to victims, said that “while nothing can undo the abuse which survivors have suffered”, it “wants everyone who is eligible to receive this compensation”.

It added: “The intention is to provide survivors with a trauma-informed alternative to litigating against Harrods.”

The company said it would be premature to comment on the total number of claims it could receive.

Applications to the scheme are limited to those who have potential claims against Harrods for acts of sexual abuse perpetrated by Al Fayed, according to the documents.

Victims can apply for compensation until March 31 next year, although Harrods said it may extend the deadline.

WSJ : A Wild Quarter for U.S. Stocks Sends Investors Abroad

A Wild Quarter for U.S. Stocks Sends Investors Abroad
Tariff uncertainty and a flagging tech trade drag the S&P 500 and Nasdaq lower to start 2025

Worries about tariffs and the economy sent the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite to their worst quarters since 2022, a setback that is pushing some investors overseas..

The Trump administration’s whipsaw rollout of a tariff fight with America’s biggest trading partners has analysts trimming forecasts for economic growth and lifting estimates for inflation. The tech trade that carried indexes to new highs is fizzling. Investors big and small have been shifting bets to Europe—where new spending plans could jolt a lethargic economy—and beyond.

Monday’s action highlighted the volatility pummeling markets in recent weeks. U.S. stocks opened sharply lower following a global selloff overnight, before an afternoon rally carried the broad index to its largest intraday recovery in more than two years.


“For the first time in a while, you can have a conversation about: Might European equities be the best place to be for the next two or three years?” said John Porter, chief investment officer at Newton Investment Management, which has been buying European stocks in many of its strategies in recent months. “You can have that conversation for reasons other than they’re cheap.”

The S&P 500 is struggling to claw its way out of a correction after falling 10% from its February record. The tumultuous quarter has left the U.S. stock benchmark down 5.1%, far behind the gains of indexes overseas. The dollar has weakened, leaving investors wondering if the pullback from investing in U.S. assets heralds the start of a long-term regime.

It is a far cry from the end of 2024, when the S&P 500 capped a second consecutive year of more than 20% gains. Cooling inflation had allowed the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates three times in a row. Election Day victories by President Trump and congressional Republicans seemed to presage tax cuts, deregulation and boom times ahead.

Few money managers are ready to proclaim an age of European dominance. But some are considering the possibility that years of middling results from the continent’s stock markets could give way to sustained strong performance.

While European stocks have long been cheaper than U.S. shares relative to companies’ earnings, the continent’s sluggish economy and less tech-oriented market had turned off many investors.

Now, with the U.S. warning Europe not to take its military protection for granted, Germany and other countries have announced major increases in defense spending that some economists think could jump-start the region’s economy.

Investors are rushing to get in on the action. The Stoxx Europe 600 index has outpaced the S&P 500 by 11.9 percentage points so far this year, on track for its largest quarterly lead since the start of 2015, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Among defense stocks in Europe, Rheinmetall in Germany has more than doubled while Thales in France has climbed 78%.

Bank of America’s March global fund manager survey showed a record rotation out of U.S. stocks, leaving a net 23% of respondents underweight shares of American companies. Preference for eurozone equities, meanwhile, leapt to its highest level since July 2021.

For European stocks to lead over the long term, many investors say governments would need to adopt business-friendly policies such as eased regulation. Last year, former European Central Bank President Mario Draghi proposed wide-ranging changes intended to boost Europe’s productivity.

At T. Rowe Price, the asset allocation committee has been favoring international stocks over U.S. shares as it looks out over the next six to 12 months, said Sébastien Page, head of global multiasset and chief investment officer. But Page, who oversees more than $550 billion for the firm, isn’t calling for a decadelong regime shift.

“Long term, I still think that U.S. tech dominance will continue,” he said. “You can’t count U.S. tech out.”

Big U.S. tech stocks have powered the market higher in recent years. Since the end of 2019, Nvidia shares have soared roughly 1,800%, while Apple has advanced about 200% and Microsoft 140%. That compares with gains of 73% for the S&P 500 and 30% for the Stoxx Europe 600.

The tech giants have pulled back recently. Nvidia, the darling of the artificial-intelligence boom, stumbled after the emergence in January of an AI model from Chinese company DeepSeek that appeared to rival Western versions while using less-advanced chips. Its shares are down 18% this year, while Apple and Microsoft have fallen 13% and 10%, respectively.
Most S&P 500 sectors are higher so far this year. Groups that tend to be resilient in downturns, such as healthcare, consumer staples and utilities, have advanced, but so have financials, a segment whose fortunes are closely linked to the health of the economy.

Still, investors’ nerves remain evident. Gold, seen as a haven in times of trouble, has rallied 17% this year and is trading at records. And investors who have grown more worried about the economic outlook have snapped up Treasurys, driving the yield on the benchmark 10-year note down to 4.254%, from 4.577% at the end of last year.

While consumer sentiment has dropped, the labor market has remained in decent shape and retail sales rose modestly in February. Many investors think the economy can continue to hum along—especially if the U.S. settles on a trade policy so businesses can plan their next moves.

“If that uncertainty continues for a very long time, I think you’re just going to see a lot of people sitting on their hands, not making a decision on capital budgets for the year, projects, hiring,” said Tiffany Wade, senior portfolio manager at Columbia Threadneedle Investments. “That would have some serious negative economic repercussions.”

WWD : Consumer Behaviors Emerge as Anxiety Rises Over Fear of Unexpected Expense

Consumer Behaviors Emerge as Anxiety Rises Over Fear of Unexpected Expenses
New research from Splitit and Pymnts highlights consumer sentiments in light of economic uncertainty today.

In its latest research report, Splitit teamed up with Pymnts for a survey of more than 7,000 U.S. consumers to gauge stress levels amid rising economic uncertainty. The report found rising financial strain with anxiety reaching new levels — especially among parents and younger adult consumers — highlighting shifting approaches to financing.

“From trade turbulence to market volatility, Americans are navigating a growing list of financial challenges,” said Nandan Sheth, chief executive officer of Splitit. “Consumers are feeling very anxious at the moment.”

Across all consumers more than 53 percent told the company that they are concerned about affording unexpected expenses in 2023 citing rising anxiety over economic uncertainty. This percentage rises to 63 percent of Gen Z consumers. The authors of the report said the report’s findings are “especially crucial as leading indicators point to a broad decline in consumer confidence, driven by worries over the impact of tariffs on household finances.”

Survey respondents listed emergency car repairs (42.9 percent) and home repair costs (34.3 percent) as just two of the unplanned expenses that “often come with a hefty price tag.” Home repairs are highlighted in the report as the most expensive category, carrying a median spend for consumers of $2,112.

Half of consumers cited the rising costs of goods as the top reason why they expect to make fewer impulse purchases this year. Still, 36 percent of consumers said they made an impulse purchase of at least $250 in the last three months, with a median spend of $497.

Citing consumer anxiety, Sheth said the company “[sees] consumers becoming more strategic in managing unplanned expenses, balancing financial stability with flexible payment options. Credit card-linked installments provide a smart way to handle life’s surprises, allowing shoppers to leverage their existing credit lines while maintaining financial flexibility. With many consumers already accustomed to using their credit cards for these types of purchases, this approach offers a seamless and responsible way to stay in control in today’s uncertain economy.”

Overall, the research found that consumers are relying on both credit cards and alternative financing to manage emergency and impulse spending. According to the report, only 9 percent of consumers use buy now, pay later for emergency purchases, instead defaulting to credit cards. Thirty-eight percent of Baby Boomers said they rely on credit cards for emergency costs.

Importantly, the findings found that “credit accessibility continues to shape purchasing behavior.” Consumers are more likely to finance unexpected expenses when they have strong credit while those who hesitate to make unplanned purchases often have below-average credit and limited financing options.

When asked about their spending behaviors for BNPL, 45 percent of users said that knowing their purchase would be approved was a key factor in their decision to use BNPL. Forty-eight percent of consumers who made their latest impulse purchase with a credit card paid it off in full at the next statement, while 30 percent used installment plans. Unsurprisingly, Gen Z is leading the way in the shift toward credit card-linked installment plans with 24 percent reporting the use of merchant-offered installment plans — a rate that doubles the rate of older generations.

>>> Fed's Williams (voter): It's early days of figuring out impact of tariffs; T

Fed's Williams (voter): It's early days of figuring out impact of tariffs; There's still a lot of uncertainty around tariffs and details matter - press interview
- Full impact of tariffs can play out over long horizon; Need open mind on how long tariff impacts will last
- Tariffs will impact prices
- Consumer goods should see quick pass through from tariffs; Intermediate goods could see slow impact from tariffs
- Definitely a risk of inflation being higher than Fed forecasts
- My forecast that inflation will be relatively stable this year with upside risks
- Uncertainty is very high right now, more concerns about slowing economy
- Won't predict odds of recession, economy is currently very solid amid good job market
- Won't discount weak survey and anecdotal data; Uncertainty appears to be impacting behavior
- Fed won't allow high inflation to take route- Economy doesn't have stagflation right now
- Expects economy to continue to grow but at slower pace than last year
- Monetary policy has been really well positioned; Policy is moderately restrictive
- Fed needs to follow what it learns from data
- Fed needs to keep longer-run inflation expectations anchored; Longer-run inflation expectations are anchored today
- Slowing balance-sheet runoff was natural next step

>>> Fed’s Barkin (non-voter for 2025): Base case is its going to take a while be

Fed’s Barkin (non-voter for 2025): Base case is its going to take a while before we get clarity - CNBC
- Besides tariff rates, there is consumer response
- Suppliers are emboldened, says they'll have to pass on higher prices
- Consumers say they're tired of paying higher prices
- Not convinced that higher prices will be passed on or that there won't be inflation
- To cut rates you need confidence on inflation
- When we use stagflation think of inflation expectations becoming unanchored; we are not seeing that now
- Data right now is okay, but there is a risk on the employment side due to tariffs
- This is not the time to say how many rate cuts I've penciled in for this year; Now is not the time for forward guidance on policy
- Nervous about inflation and employment data
- Reiterates that the Fed is in no hurry to cut rates; Retains a wait and see policy
- The balance sheet runoff could be slower for longer

TechCrunch : OpenAI plans to release a new ‘open’ language model in the coming m

OpenAI plans to release a new ‘open’ language model in the coming months

OpenAI says that it intends to release its first “open” language model since GPT‑2 “in the coming months.”

That’s according to a feedback form the company published on its website Monday. The form, which OpenAI is inviting “developers, researchers, and [members of] the broader community” to fill out, includes questions like “What would you like to see in an open-weight model from OpenAI?” and “What open models have you used in the past?”

“We’re excited to collaborate with developers, researchers, and the broader community to gather inputs and make this model as useful as possible,” OpenAI wrote on its website. “If you’re interested in joining a feedback session with the OpenAI team, please let us know [in the form] below.”

OpenAI is facing increasing pressure from rivals such as Chinese AI lab DeepSeek, which have adopted an “open” approach to launching models. In contrast to OpenAI’s strategy, these “open” competitors make their models available to the AI community for experimentation and, in some cases, commercialization.

In a recent Reddit Q&A, Altman said that he thinks OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history when it comes to open-sourcing its technologies.

“[I personally think we need to] figure out a different open source strategy,” Altman said. “Not everyone at OpenAI shares this view, and it’s also not our current highest priority … We will produce better models [going forward], but we will maintain less of a lead than we did in previous years.”