FT : The story behind Spain’s solar power meltdown

The story behind Spain’s solar power meltdown
Pedro Sánchez calls his country a ‘global benchmark’ in the transition to greener energy, but prices — and profits — have plunged

The dusty terrain has been levelled by tractors and rammed with ranks of metal rods. They will soon support thousands of solar panels, rotated by mini-motors being screwed on by construction workers in 35C heat.

“Setting up a solar plant is ultimately like building a factory in the countryside,” says Miguel de la Rosa, an engineering chief for project owner Zelestra, as cable reels and crates of electrical gear imported from China sit in the dirt, ready for connection to the power grid early next year.

The project in Belinchón, a municipality 50km south of Madrid, is another tract of sun-baked Spain now blanketed by rectangles of black silicon, but it may also be the final echo of an era of breakneck growth.

Photovoltaic cells have been the building blocks of a solar power boom spurred by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, whose support for renewables, combined with Spain’s abundant sunshine, has driven a wave of construction. Since he took power in 2018, energy developers have built solar parks, proved that power generation had attractive returns and pulled in capital from yield-hungry investors.

In 2023 and 2024, Spain added more solar power capacity than any other European country except Germany, whose economy is more than twice its size. Aggressive bidding between competitors in the M&A market drove prices for existing projects ever higher.

At some times in spring, as much as 60 per cent of Spain’s electricity comes from the sun. That has enabled Spain to slash its use of gas and coal-fired power stations. Consumers have reaped the rewards, as cheap electricity frees the country from the angst elsewhere in Europe over utility bills.

Sánchez calls his country a “global benchmark” in the transition to greener, carbon-free energy as Europe, the world’s fastest-warming continent, bears the brunt of climate change. But the sunlit uplands of solar have begun to overheat.

Spain has built so much solar capacity that at certain times of day it produces far more electricity than it needs. Prices have plunged as a result, dragging down owners’ profits with them. Over the past year, “day ahead” wholesale electricity prices were zero or even negative 10 per cent of the time, according to data from grid operator Red Eléctrica. In May, they were at zero or below for one-third of the entire month.

Free power is gratifying for customers, but bad for generators. Some solar operators are told to shut down by Red Eléctrica to curb oversupply, via “curtailment” orders for which they are not always compensated.

The hit to profits has been compounded by another blow: the Iberian blackout in late April, which began in Spain and left 58mn people without power for at least five hours, and in many places for much longer.

The government has concluded that solar power did not cause the outage, but its prevalence in the energy mix is important context for what went wrong.

Investors and power companies said their doubts about the adequacy of the Spanish electricity system had been confirmed by the blackout.

They do not question solar’s essential role in the clean energy transition. But due to oversights or overconfidence, they say Spain has not adapted to its reliance on solar energy. Prices and demand are too low. Its grid and use of battery storage are behind the times. In a country that is a test case for renewables, the solar boom appears to have gone too far, too fast.

Legacy projects such as Zelestra’s are being completed, but a sharp slowdown in new projects is forecast for 2026. M&A activity has switched to fire sales. Solar projects that were selling for €200,000 per megawatt two years ago are now on the market for €28,000-€89,000, according to nTeaser, a deals marketplace.

“The sector is suffering the consequences of oversupply, which is having a very grave effect on the profitability of solar projects,” says Mario Ruiz-Tagle, who heads the Spanish business of Iberdrola, Europe’s largest utility.

Yet the building is supposed to continue apace. Today Spain has 36GW of total solar capacity and the government’s target is to reach 76GW by 2030.

“What the government says in its road map is one thing,” says Pablo Martínez, Iberia lead at Modo Energy, a data provider. “But the industry and the price signals in the market say something else.”

When Sánchez became Spain’s Socialist prime minister, he ended a run of barren years for renewables. A previous leftwing government had used subsidies to encourage an incipient solar sector but, as the Eurozone crisis deepened, a subsequent conservative administration swiped away that support in 2012-13 as part of efforts to reduce public debt.

Sánchez helped restart a solar boom by committing himself to decarbonisation and easing some permitting. He did not offer subsidies — neither the kind of clean energy tax credits in Joe Biden’s now semi-repealed Inflation Reduction Act in the US, nor the fixed price guarantees that the UK offers renewable generators.


What mattered to investors was Sánchez’s assurance of no more U-turns. But the blackout that hit at 12.33pm on April 28 highlighted the shortcomings of a vital part of the system: the electricity grid.

The government has blamed the outage on mistakes by both Red Eléctrica and the utilities that run gas and nuclear power stations, saying they failed to damp down a voltage surge on the grid. But its official report noted something else: the surge was linked to instability at a solar plant. At 12.03pm, an unnamed facility in Badajoz in western Spain produced an “anomalous” oscillation in grid frequency — the rate at which the electrical current alternates. It was so big it registered in France and Germany.

The presence of a solar plant in the causal chain was telling. No longer is the Spanish system centred on a few dozen fossil fuel and nuclear plants whose huge turbines are located close to urban demand hubs. Instead, it relies on a web of smaller renewable plants dispersed across rural areas, including 54,000 solar installations. They generate power intermittently, depending on cloud cover and the rotation of the earth, and do not help to stabilise grid frequency and voltage in the same way as giant gas and nuclear turbines.

“This transformation has pushed the grid to the limits of the generation mix,” said José Bogas, chief executive of Endesa, a big Spanish utility, in May. But, he added, “we have continued to operate the system as we used to”.

While Spain has championed investment in solar parks, the grid has been neglected. According to BloombergNEF, it has been Europe’s stingiest grid investor since 2020, putting only $0.30 into the grid for every $1 invested in renewables, versus a pan-European average of $0.70.

“Spain was very early and very fast with renewable deployment, but it has not been as speedy as some others with planning,” says Axel Thiemann, chief executive of Sonnedix, an international power producer that generates renewable energy in the Iberian peninsula.

The authorities had been happy to see renewable energy production rising while grid costs, which generally get passed on to consumers, stayed affordable, says one executive at a big energy producer who asked not to be named. “They exhausted the economic model to the most cost-efficient point,” the executive adds. But the blackout showed “there are no free lunches”.

As long ago as 2017 a group of European grid operators, Entso-e, warned that the growth of renewables risked creating instability in the grid and called for the deployment of devices that mimic the stabilising function of turbines, known as grid-forming inverters. Portuguese grid operator Ren, whose system was dragged down by the Spanish outage, made concrete proposals for investments in shock absorbing equipment in a December 2024 plan.

But Spain’s minority government acted only after the network collapsed, unveiling new “anti-blackout” legislation in June. “There’s been more regulation in the past few weeks than in the past five years,” says Iberdrola’s Ruiz-Tagle.

Joan Groizard, Spain’s secretary of state for energy, told the Financial Times that “we’ve reflected not only on how we reinforce the electricity system now, but how we prepare a system that will continue to evolve” up to 2030.

The legislation gave Red Eléctrica a long list of new orders, requiring it to do more to control voltage, to deploy new technology, and to use extra leeway to adapt its planning when circumstances change.


But Groizard adds a caveat. “Let’s remember that the key opportunity here is price competitiveness. If I massively increase investment in the grid without any clear criteria, and as a result drive up costs on electricity bills, I will no longer be competitive.”

On July 22 that point became moot. The legislation was voted down in Spain’s Congress in a rebellion led by both conservatives and the hard left, who complained the government was not holding anyone to account for the blackout. The government is now trying to achieve some of the same goals via regulatory reforms that do not need parliamentary approval.

“What happened was a serious act of irresponsibility on the part of the groups that voted against the bill,” says Sara Aagesen, Spain’s deputy prime minister and energy minister.

In some ways, Spain’s solar energy boom is a victim of its own success.

In spring and autumn, the sun is still strong enough to maximise solar output, but mild temperatures mean consumers have no need for things like air conditioning or heating.

The result is that the day-ahead electricity price set by OMIE, the Iberian market operator, falls to zero or below. On May 11, the spot price hit a record low of minus €15 per megawatt hour.

But that does not mean every generator is giving away electricity for free. Power producers have pioneered the use of long-term supply contracts, known as power purchase agreements (PPA), which they sign with corporate clients for 10-20 years to secure price stability.

Zelestra’s Belinchón project, a 150MW facility planned last year when the market was less strained, has a deal with a group of pharmaceutical companies including Takeda and Teva. When it was signed, the average PPA price in Spain was €39 per megawatt hour, according to Our New Energy, a services group.

But zero prices in the spot market remain a problem, says Zelestra’s Moreno, because they make clients less inclined to sign solar-only PPAs.

Spain has limited options for the surplus energy on its hands. Exporting large volumes to the rest of Europe is unfeasible because its grid links to France are limited. So the solution to the glut is storage.

Several power producers, including Rolwind, Grenergy, Sonnedix and Zelestra, are now switching their attention to batteries. Their bet is that charging them during solar hours and discharging them in the evening will do two things: lift daytime prices off the floor and give them more electricity to sell profitably at peak hours.

“The operators of existing plants know that to defend themselves against the price curve they need to install batteries,” says Luis Marquina, head of Aepibal, a battery trade group.


Others argue batteries are not a panacea, in part because they cannot match the vast capacity of hydro plants that store energy by using it to pump water uphill. But in recent years both California and Australia, big generators of solar power, have successfully used batteries to flatten out prices.

In Europe, the UK has installed 5GW of battery capacity while Italy has 1GW, according to Rabobank. Energy executives say that Spain — with only 60MW of battery capacity — has again been behind the pack. One obstacle is a slow permitting process, says Moreno, even when batteries are just being added to an existing solar plant.

Another complaint is that while batteries can help prevent blackouts by providing backup generation or voltage control, Spain — unlike the UK — has not set up a regulated market where owners can get paid to offer those services.

Measures to tackle those barriers were a pillar of the anti-blackout legislation. But while it remains blocked, and the alternative regulatory reforms are pending, some investors say there is too much financial risk in batteries.

Shuffling supply and demand around during the day masks a more profound challenge: Spain’s overall electricity consumption is flat — no higher last year than it was in 2004.

Hopes have been pinned on industries abandoning natural gas and using green electricity to generate heat for ceramics, glassmaking or food processing. This is on top of bold forecasts for electric vehicles and heat pumps replacing gas boilers.

“Electrification has not been as fast as we would have hoped in Europe overall, but in Spain in particular. In a rational world you would say low prices incentivise consumption and that has not happened,” says Sonnedix’s Thiemann.


Power utilities counter that industrial demand for cheap power is emerging, but cannot be satisfied because the grid does not have enough capacity.

The bottleneck is in securing an access point from Red Eléctrica, because the petition process is clogged. Utilities had to reject 34GW of 67GW in requests last year, says Aelec, a trade group that represents Iberdrola, Endesa and EDP.

One-third came from data centres and US tech giants including Amazon, Meta and Microsoft have all announced big Spanish projects that require huge amounts of power. “There is an enormous appetite from the data centres,” says Moreno. “They consider Spain the number one place to go in Europe.”

But the companies will face familiar obstacles. “Grid interconnection? It’s going to take a long time to assess. Permitting? It’s hard,” he adds. “The interest is real. The speed at which they can actually build is uncertain.”

Spain’s problem is not that its solar boom went too fast, “it’s that the government has been too slow”, says another energy executive.

Energy minister Groizard demurs. The rejected anti-blackout bill sought to resolve the grid access problem by prioritising genuine projects — and the regulatory initiative replacing it tries to do the same.

More generally, he argues that generation capacity had to be built before demand would follow. By his rationale, solar oversupply and zero prices are not a failure, but “transitional” phenomena that are now attracting industry as they were meant to.

“There will be a balance between supply and demand at competitive prices,” Groizard says, “within just a few years.”

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 11th of August 2025

>>> Up
* Admiral Raised to Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 3,300 pence
* Airbnb Raised to Buy at DBS Bank; PT $165
* Airbnb Raised to Neutral at Phillip Secs; PT $127
* Asmodee Raised to Buy at SEB Equities; PT 145 kronor
* Chesnara Raised to Buy at Peel Hunt
* Corbion Raised to Neutral at Van Lanschot Kempen; PT 16 euros
* Demant Raised to Buy at ABG; PT 315 kroner
* Disney Raised to Buy at DBS Bank; PT $135
* Freeport Raised to Overweight at Morgan Stanley; PT $48
* Maersk PT Raised to 8,450 kroner from 7,800 kroner at JPMorgan
* Recordati Raised to Buy at Jefferies; PT 61.50 euros
* Symrise Raised to Buy at Baader Helvea; PT 100 euros

>>> Down
* C3.ai Cut to Underperform at DA Davidson; PT $13
* Elementis Cut to Neutral at JPMorgan; PT 186 pence
* Glaston Cut to Reduce at Inderes; PT 1.25 euros
* Just Group Cut to Hold at Jefferies; PT 219.20 pence
* Sandvik Cut to Sell at Nordea; PT 210 kronor
* Technip Energies Cut to Hold at Fearnley; PT 44 euros
* WithSecure Cut to Hold at Nordea

>>> Initiation
* Metlen Energy & Metals Rated New Overweight at Morgan Stanley
* Sea1 offshore Inc Rated New Buy at ABG; PT 38 kroner

>>> Call
* Admiral Raised at Morgan Stanley, Investment Case More Balanced
* Elementis Upside More Limited After Rally, JPMorgan Downgrades
* Recordati Raised to Buy at Jefferies, Momentum Being Masked

WSJ : Activist Investor to Push Avantor to Make Changes or Sell Itself

Activist Investor to Push Avantor to Make Changes or Sell Itself
Engine Capital has a roughly 3% stake in the life-sciences company

  • Engine Capital has taken a 3% stake in Avantor and may reveal it on Monday.
  • Engine believes Avantor should pursue an immediate sale or make changes, such as refreshing the board.
  • Avantor’s stock has dropped nearly 50% this year, giving it a market value of $7.8 billion.

Activist investor Engine Capital has built a stake in Avantor AVTR 1.05%increase; green up pointing triangle and plans to push the life-sciences company to sell itself or make other changes, according to people familiar with the matter.

The details
The investment firm could reveal its roughly 3% stake in Avantor on Monday, the people said.

Radnor, Pa.-based Avantor sells lab equipment and supplies used by life-sciences companies and others. The company has a market value of about $7.8 billion after its shares fell nearly 50% so far this year.

Engine believes the company should either pursue an immediate sale or make changes that could include a board refresh, increased stock buybacks, cost cuts or selling noncore parts of its business, the people said.

Engine thinks the entire company could sell for between $17 and $19 a share, according to the people. Shares closed Friday at $11.50.

The investment firm also believes shares could trade as high as $26 apiece by the end of 2027 if the company were to make the necessary changes on its own, the people added.

The context
Demand for Avantor’s products has dropped, especially in the government and education sectors, due to research funding cuts by the Trump administration. Its shares were already on a downward slide when the company announced the departure of its longtime chief executive officer in April, which caused them to drop further.

Avantor made its debut on the public market in 2019 after being owned by private-equity firm New Mountain Capital.

Engine was founded in 2013 by Arnaud Ajdler. It launched a proxy fight at ride-share company Lyft earlier this year, but withdrew its nominees after Lyft agreed to expand its share buyback program.

>>> TradeGate Pre_Market Indications

DAX:
  • Merck KGaA (MRK TH) +1.3%
  • Symrise (SY1 TH) +1.2%
  • Adidas (ADS TH) +1.1%
  • Siemens Healthineers (SHL TH) +1%
  • Henkel (HEN3 TH) -0.6%
  • Rheinmetall (RHM TH) -1.2%
MDAX:
  • Redcare Pharmacy NV (RDC TH) +2.2%
  • Aixtron (AIXA TH) +1.2%
  • Evotec (EVT TH) +1.2%
  • GEA Group (G1A TH) +1.2%
  • Thyssenkrupp (TKA TH) +1.2%
  • Fuchs (FPE3 TH) -1.1%
  • Hensoldt (HAG TH) -1.4%
  • RENK Group (R3NK TH) -1.5%
SDAX:
  • Kloeckner (KCO TH) +2.1%
  • Cancom (COK TH) +1.5%
  • Kontron (KTN TH) +1.4%
  • Befesa (BFSA TH) +1.3%
  • Friedrich Vorwerk Group SE (VH2 TH) +1.1%
  • MLP (MLP TH) -0.8%

>>> Stoxx 600 Pre_Market Indications

    • Novo (NOV TH) +2.8%
    • Atlas Copco (ACO4 TH) +2.1%
    • Investor AB (IVSD TH) +1.9%
    • Unilever (UNVB TH) +1.9%
    • Rolls-Royce (RRU TH) +1.4%
    • Legal & General (LGI TH) +1.2%
    • Diageo (GUI TH) +1.2%
    • Equinor (DNQ TH) +1.1%
      • Watch Oil Stocks Ahead of US-Russia Talks on Ukraine
    • Redcare Pharmacy NV (RDC TH) +1.1%
    • Wolters Kluwer (WOSB TH) +1.1%
    • Saab (SDV1 TH) -1%
    • Dassault Aviation (DAU0 TH) -1%
    • Fuchs (FPE3 TH) -1.1%
    • Rheinmetall (RHM TH) -1.5%
    • Reply (REJA TH) -1.6%
    • Kongsberg (KOZ1 TH) -1.7%
    • Thales (CSF TH) -1.7%
    • Hensoldt (HAG TH) -2.2%
    • RENK Group (R3NK TH) -2.3%
    • Orsted (D2G TH) -8%
      • *ORSTED PLANS RIGHTS ISSUE TO RAISE GROSS PROCEEDS OF DKK60B

>>> TradeGate Pre_Market Indications

  • Novo (NOV TH) +2.8%
  • Atlas Copco (ACO4 TH) +2.1%
  • Investor AB (IVSD TH) +1.9%
  • Unilever (UNVB TH) +1.9%
  • Rolls-Royce (RRU TH) +1.4%
  • Legal & General (LGI TH) +1.2%
  • Diageo (GUI TH) +1.2%
  • Equinor (DNQ TH) +1.1%
    • Watch Oil Stocks Ahead of US-Russia Talks on Ukraine
  • Redcare Pharmacy NV (RDC TH) +1.1%
  • Wolters Kluwer (WOSB TH) +1.1%
  • Saab (SDV1 TH) -1%
  • Dassault Aviation (DAU0 TH) -1%
  • Fuchs (FPE3 TH) -1.1%
  • Rheinmetall (RHM TH) -1.5%
  • Reply (REJA TH) -1.6%
  • Kongsberg (KOZ1 TH) -1.7%
  • Thales (CSF TH) -1.7%
  • Hensoldt (HAG TH) -2.2%
  • RENK Group (R3NK TH) -2.3%
  • Orsted (D2G TH) -8%
    • *ORSTED PLANS RIGHTS ISSUE TO RAISE GROSS PROCEEDS OF DKK60B

WSJ : The Engineering Marvel That China Hopes Will Help Wean It Off Foreign Ener

The Engineering Marvel That China Hopes Will Help Wean It Off Foreign Energy
A $167 billion power project promotes Chinese self-sufficiency while unsettling neighbors downstream


  • China has started building a $167 billion hydropower project to help it become self-sufficient in energy.
  • The project could generate triple the output of China’s Three Gorges Dam, but raises environmental and geopolitical concerns.
  • The plan avoids the pitfalls of a megadam, relying on tunnels cut through high mountains to harness the power of a diverted river.

HONG KONG—China has begun the construction of a giant hydropower project at the earthquake-prone edge of the Tibetan plateau, a spectacular engineering feat that is central to Beijing’s enduring mission to become self-sufficient in critical areas such as energy.

The $167 billion facility will require digging tunnels that plunge through high mountains to harness the power of a river that sharply descends through the deepest and possibly longest canyon on the planet.

If its planners succeed—after shrugging off objections from neighbors—the project could generate triple the output of the world’s largest hydroelectric facility, China’s Three Gorges Dam, which is big enough to power around 40 million Chinese homes.

The endeavor is a dramatic example of China’s determination to become self-reliant in areas of national importance, from technology to food, a yearslong campaign that has gained momentum as Beijing’s rivalry with the U.S. intensifies. China imported nearly a quarter of its energy supply in 2023, a level of dependency that Beijing is working hard to undo.

The plan, slated to be the world’s most expensive infrastructure project, will also plow money into a struggling Chinese economy and bring jobs and business to a remote and sensitive corner of China where Beijing is trying to engineer the loyalty of the Tibetan population. A planned $7 billion high-voltage transmission network will deliver electricity from the site in Tibet to Guangdong province, the economic center on China’s southeast coast, and the cities of Hong Kong and Macau.

But the project on the Yarlung Tsangpo River has stirred accusations that it will give Beijing the power to strangle resources beyond its borders, where the river flows into northeastern India and then south through Bangladesh.

It has also raised fears of environmental damage and potential disaster in the mountainous, seismically active region. The location is one of vast biodiversity, featuring rare primates and a wider range of big cats, from snow leopards to Bengal tigers, than anywhere else in the world.

China has yet to reveal the details, but it is evident that the design aims to avoid the pitfalls of some of the original plans, which included using nuclear explosions to blast a route north.

“It’s super clever,” said Ruth Gamble, an environmental historian at La Trobe University in Australia who studies Himalayan rivers. “I don’t like dams, but as far as dams go it avoids all the wrong stuff.”

The project achieves that because it likely won’t rely on a megadam to generate power.

Instead, according to interviews, online postings by Chinese hydrologists and a review of official statements, the project involves drilling deep tunnels that begin above and emerge below the Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon—essentially cutting across a U-shaped bend that descends nearly 2 vertical miles over more than 300 miles. It is expected to include dams at the top and bottom of tunnels in which diverted water drives turbines.


Chinese Premier Li Qiang, inaugurating the project last month, called it a “project of the century.”

Experts say it appears to emphasize “run-of-the-river” design, using the water’s flow without relying on significant storage behind a dam.

“This dam doesn’t take the water out of the river,” said Mark Giordano, a geography professor at Georgetown University. “It’s a tunnel that reroutes it from one part of the Chinese river, through the tunnel and enters the river again on the Chinese side before flowing to India.”

The bigger issue for China and its downstream neighbors could be the dam’s location in an area with a history of huge earthquakes. In 1950, a magnitude-8.6 earthquake centered about 50 miles northwest of where the Yarlung Tsangpo enters India struck the region, killing more than 4,500 people and setting off hundreds of landslides, including some that blocked rivers.

“It’s a high earthquake zone, so that’s clearly a risk,” said Giordano.

China has carried out extensive hydropower projects in recent decades in an effort to boost its supply of renewable energy. The Three Gorges Dam, which was completed in 2006, created a 400-mile reservoir on the Yangtze River and forced the relocation of 1.3 million people.

Where the Three Gorges Dam aroused skepticism, even within China’s rubber-stamp legislature, the Yarlung Tsangpo project has met with far less resistance, a sign of Beijing’s growing confidence in hydropower construction—and its ability to quash even nominal dissent.

But news of the project has prompted protests from across the border. Pema Khandu, chief minister of the neighboring Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh, has called it a “water bomb” that poses an existential threat to his constituents because untimely releases of water could exacerbate seasonal flooding.

India has responded with plans to build a megadam on the river, in part to control the flow.

Adding to tensions, Beijing claims Arunachal Pradesh as its own territory, referring to it as southern Tibet. The relationship between China and India has been strained by territorial disputes, including a deadly military clash in 2020.

China, India and Bangladesh have no agreement for managing the river, which becomes the Brahmaputra in India and eventually joins the Ganges in Bangladesh.

China has rejected criticism from states downriver, which say they could suffer from changes in the flow of water and sediment. The project will “speed up clean energy development, improve local people’s life and proactively respond to climate change,” said Guo Jiakun, a spokesman for China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
To the east of the Yarlung Tsangpo, where Tibet meets Sichuan province, China is already building a series of dams along the upper reaches of the Yangtze, the country’s longest river. More than a dozen dams are planned for that section of the river, known as the Jinsha, which is now the site of the world’s second-largest and fourth-largest dams by installed capacity.

The Yarlung Tsangpo has been comparatively untouched. A group of Chinese hydrologists estimated in 2022 that the river was generating just 2% of its potential hydropower capacity.

Exiled Tibetans in India say they also have concerns about the work being done in their homeland, and some projects have prompted protests, including the Yebatan dam on the Upper Jinsha, which Tibetans protested last year because some villages and historic monasteries would be inundated.

“When disaster happens, it’s the local Tibetans that face the consequences,” said Lobsang Yangtso, an environmental researcher with the International Tibet Network based in India.

WSJ : Nvidia, AMD to Give U.S. 15% Cut on AI Chip Sales to China

Nvidia, AMD to Give U.S. 15% Cut on AI Chip Sales to China
Unusual arrangement follows Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s meeting with Trump

  • Nvidia and AMD will give the Trump administration a portion of AI chip sales to China.
  • The Trump administration will receive 15% of sales from Nvidia’s H20 AI chip exports to China.
  • The revenue agreement came after Nvidia CEO met with President Trump to discuss chip tariffs.

Nvidia NVDA 1.07%increase; green up pointing triangle and Advanced Micro Devices AMD 0.21%increase; green up pointing triangle have agreed to give the Trump administration a portion of the sales from their artificial-intelligence chips to China, unusual agreements that deepen their relationships with the U.S. government.

The Trump administration will receive 15% of the sales as part of a deal to approve exports of Nvidia’s H20 AI chip to China, according to people familiar with the matter. That could amount to billions of dollars given demand for the H20 chips and is the latest example of the White House employing novel tactics to raise revenue.

The administration has reached the same agreement with AMD for its MI308 chip, the people said. Details of the arrangements and the financial structures are still being worked out.

The Commerce Department began issuing licenses for Nvidia to send its H20 chip to China Friday, following through on a July promise. Over the weekend, the agency started moving licenses for the AMD chip, some of the people familiar with the matter said.

Exports of the H20 and MI308 were halted in April, when trade tensions between the U.S. and China were simmering. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has gone on a charm offensive since then, talking to officials in both countries about the need to do business with one another.

“We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets,” Nvidia said in a statement Sunday. “While we haven’t shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide.”

The revenue agreement came after Huang met with President Trump on Wednesday, the same day Trump announced tech companies that invest in the U.S. would be exempt from new chip tariffs. The Financial Times earlier reported on the agreements.

It is unusual for companies to essentially pay for export licenses. The agreements follow criticism from national-security hawks who fear the chips and other technology will boost China’s AI ecosystem and military.

Nvidia has said its chips don’t get diverted to U.S. adversaries in large quantities. Administration officials say the H20 isn’t a top-performing chip and that they want Nvidia to compete with China’s Huawei around the world.

The Nvidia and AMD licenses are some of the only licenses being granted while the U.S. and China continue negotiating on trade. Access to semiconductors is one of the biggest priorities for the Chinese and advantages for the U.S.

Nvidia developed the H20 specifically for the Chinese market in 2023 after the Biden administration placed export restrictions on more advanced AI chips. The chip uses the company’s Hopper architecture, which allows for tens of thousands of cores, or processing units that can each handle simultaneous computations, and is less powerful than Nvidia’s latest series, known as Blackwell.

The chip isn’t advanced enough to quickly train large language AI models, but is useful for inference functions, or the processes by which models that have already been trained can draw conclusions from new data.

Chinese authorities have raised concerns about H20 chips, cautioning that they aren’t environmentally friendly and could come with security risks. Nvidia said this month that the chips don’t have so-called “backdoors” that allow them to be controlled or accessed remotely.

The Trump administration has made exporting U.S. AI to the rest of the world a top priority, hoping that American chip and model companies become the standard globally.

Chinese models from companies such as DeepSeek and Alibaba are taking hold in many countries, increasing pressure on the U.S. to continue improving its capabilities in that area.