>>> US After Hours Summary: MODN +26.7%, MKL +7%, ISSC +6.7%

After Hours Summary: MODN +26.7%, MKL +7%, ISSC +6.7%, LOX -30.6%, RAX -10.6%, QLYS -9.4% following earnings/guidance

After Hours Gainers: Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings: MODN +26.7%, MKL +7%, ISSC +6.7%, CPSS +6.1%, SSNI +5.7%, SYUT +5.1%, RICK +3.6%, MTSI +3.2%, CAP +3.1%, TARO +3.1%, PRI +2.9%, CYS +1.4%, MERU +0.2%, MAS +1.3%, RLD +1%, IMMU +0.8%, MOH +0.5%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: AXLL +7.6% (co and Lotte Chemical signed preliminary agreement to partner on proposed ethane cracker in Louisana), LJPC +6.7% (Co and The French National Institute of Health and Medical Research, today announced an exclusive worldwide license agreement to develop hepcidin agonists), SSNI +5.7% (co released statement in support of CEPT outcome to free up additional radio spectrum in Europe), HOLX +2.4% (President & CEO discloses purchase of 198.9K shares at $20.615-20.95, worth $4.1 mln), INVN +2.2% (co and STMicroelectronics (STM) announced settlement of pending patent litigation), 

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings: BLOX -30.6%, RAX -10.6%, QLYS -9.4%, BNNY -8%, WPX -7.5%, CPST -6.7%, ACAS -5.9%, AMKR -4.1%, WBMD -3.4%, KS -3.1%, SKH -2.7%, URBN -1.8%, NUAN -1.7%, FTK -1.6%, CMP -1.4%, CRK -1.1%, AIN -1%, GDOT -0.5%, OMI -0.5%, HIW -0.5%, WCN -0.3%, MAA -0.1%, PXD 0%, MERU 0.2%, MOH 0.5%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: NMM -4.7% (announced public offering of 5.5 mln common units), MGNX -3.3% (announced proposed public offering of 2.5 mln shares of common stock; 1.5 mln being offered by MacroGenics, 1 mln by existing shareholders), ARRY -2.1% (T. Rowe Price disclosed 7.2% passive stake), STON -2.0% (announced public offering of 1.8 mln common units), ASTM -1.2% (filed for ~1.75 mln share common stock offering by selling shareholders), ATO -1.2% (announced public offering of 8 mln shares of common stock), SCMP -1.0% (named Peter Greenleaf CEO)

Sony Suffering Seen as Prelude to Loeb-Inspired Revamp: Real M&A

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Sony Suffering Seen as Prelude to Loeb-Inspired Revamp: Real M&A 2014-02-10 21:43:31.264 GMT

(For a Real M&A column news alert: SALT REALMNA <GO>.)

By Brooke Sutherland, Tara Lachapelle and Cliff Edwards Feb. 10 (Bloomberg) -- Sony Corp.’s latest earnings disappointment held a silver lining: the company’s willingness to entertain some of activist investor Daniel Loeb’s suggestions. And it may be just the beginning. The Tokyo-based company forecast a $1.1 billion annual loss as it sells the personal-computer business and splits the TV- manufacturing division into a separate unit that it may divest eventually. While falling short of Loeb’s calls for a bigger breakup, the moves sparked an 11 percent jump in the shares last week, and followed a pledge to provide more transparency in Sony’s financial statements. “This goes a long way towards what Dan Loeb was talking about,” Lawrence Haverty, a fund manager at Gamco Investors Inc. in Rye, New York, said in a phone interview. Gamco oversees $47 billion and owns Sony shares. “I like the idea of first things first and one step at a time. There’s an awful lot of really encouraging stuff that’s happening.” More changes are needed at the $17 billion company, said Hudson Square Research Inc., which suggests spinning off a portion of Sony Entertainment, the unit that encompasses film and music, as Loeb suggested last May. Or Sony could follow the lead of rival Panasonic Corp. and continue to sell off pieces of its electronics business, said Jefferies Group LLC. Sony’s insurance and banking unit, which contributed the most operating income in the year ended March 2013, also could be split off as a separate company, Gamco’s Haverty said. John Dolak, a spokesman for Sony in the U.S., didn’t respond to a phone call or e-mail requesting comment. A representative for Sony in Japan didn’t respond to an e-mail sent after normal business hours.

Loeb Push

Loeb, who heads hedge fund Third Point LLC, urged Sony in May to sell as much as 20 percent of its entertainment division in an initial public offering so that the company could focus on turning around the struggling electronics business. At the time, shareholders had lost more than $100 billion in market value since 2000, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. After Sony Chief Executive Officer Kazuo Hirai and the board rejected the proposal in August, the activist investor said he was “disappointed” with the decision and intended to “explore further options to create value for Sony shareholders.” Last month, Third Point called for a “serious effort to restructure the PC and TV businesses,” according to a letter sent to the hedge fund’s investors. Third Point declined to comment last week.

Right Direction

Sony announced Feb. 6 that it’s selling the Vaio computer business to buyout firm Japan Industrial Partners Inc. and splitting its TV manufacturing unit into a separate operating entity. CEO Hirai also said he hasn’t ruled out a divestiture of the TV division in the future after receiving “various offers.” The company’s shares had their the biggest three-day gain in more than eight months on news of the sale. Before the rise, Sony had dropped 18 percent since Loeb first pushed for changes. Separating “the TV segment and selling the PC business are steps in the right direction to unlock value,” Todd Lowenstein, a Los Angeles-based fund manager at HighMark Capital Management Inc., which oversees about $17 billion, wrote in an e-mail. Sony has more to do and should reconsider Loeb’s advice on the entertainment spinoff, according to Daniel Ernst, a New York-based analyst at Hudson Square. The unit makes the “Spider-Man” movies and represents music artists such as Miley Cyrus.

Undervalued Shares

Sony is cheaper than most of its peers. Last week, it was valued at a 28 percent discount to its net assets. Consumer electronics makers with market values exceeding $1 billion have a median price-book ratio of 1.7, data compiled by Bloomberg show. “The shares are quite undervalued,” Albert Saporta, the head of research at Makor Capital Ltd. and a managing director at AIM&R, said in a phone interview. ‘We’re pretty much on the same wavelength as Daniel Loeb.’’ Based on the sum of its parts, Sony should be valued at least 50 percent more than last week, Haverty of Gamco said. That implies about $25 per American depositary receipt, or about 2,500 yen a share. The stock closed at 1,691 yen last week. Today, Sony shares gained 0.7 percent to 1,702 yen. Its ADRs fell 0.8 percent to $16.68. Sony could consider spinning off its financial services unit, which is consistently profitable and could exist on its own, Haverty said. The company sold shares in the division in 2007 and currently retains a majority stake in the unit, which has a market value of about $7 billion.

Electronics Exit?

Others think Sony’s focus should instead be on selling more assets in its consumer electronics division. Competitor Panasonic has jumped about 57 percent in the last 12 months in part because of shrinking its TV and handset business, and Sony should take note, according to Atul Goyal of Jefferies. “For them, salvation is an exit from electronics,” Goyal said in an interview last week with Bloomberg Television. “If there’s any buyer whatsoever in the electronics business -- and there might still be some today for TV and others -- get out now.” Besides TV’s, Sony makes products including digital cameras, headphones, MP3 players and speakers. While Haverty said he would be happy to see Sony break up, he’s optimistic about the prospects for the TV business, which he said is showing the most promise among Sony’s electronics products. Sony may make a comeback in the next 18 months as the company introduces ultra high definition TV sets that cost as much as $25,000 to meet consumer demand, he said. 

‘New Cycle’

“The consumer electronics business, I don’t really want to be an owner of that,” Haverty said. “But within electronics, investors have a shot at making money on the television business. It has a shot of working because we’re going into this new cycle.” It’s difficult for Japanese companies to make drastic changes, said Masahiko Fukasawa, co-Japan representative and managing director at AlixPartners LLP. “Discussions over strategy at Japanese companies are veiled in a haze,” Fukasawa said. “It’s hard for them to make a decision to dispose of a business that is sometimes profitable and sometimes not. In our view, it’s a waste of resources trying to sustain a business with little expectation for growth.” While Sony’s management may not think seriously about a transformation unless performance suffers even more, the moves announced last week signal at least somewhat of a shift in the company’s attitude toward the consumer electronics business, according to Goyal of Jefferies. “These are the first baby steps in the right direction,” the analyst said. “If they continue, that’s a good sign.”

For Related News and Information: Sony Forecasts $1.1 Billion Loss as Hirai Misses TV Profit Goal NSN N0LJ2B6KLVRK <GO> Sony Rejects Loeb Push to Sell Part of Entertainment Unit NSN MR3FS70D9L35 <GO> Sony’s $100 Billion Lost Decade Supports Loeb Breakup: Real M&A NSN MMVU6A6KLVRN <GO> Loeb Pushes for Sony Breakup With Entertainment IPO Proposal NSN MMT2F06S972K <GO> Sony deal news: 6758 JT <equity> TCNI MNA <GO> Real M&A columns: NI REALMNA <GO> Top deal news: DTOP <GO>

--With assistance from Mariko Yasu in Tokyo and Beth Jinks in New York. Editors: Beth Williams, Sarah Rabil

To contact the reporters on this story: Brooke Sutherland in New York at +1-212-617-0448 or bsutherland7@bloomberg.net; Tara Lachapelle in New York at +1-212-617-8911 or tlachapelle@bloomberg.net; Cliff Edwards in San Francisco at +1-415-617-7074 or cedwards28@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Sarah Rabil at +1-212-617-5992 or srabil@bloomberg.net; Anthony Palazzo at +1-323-782-4228 or apalazzo@bloomberg.net

>>> US Notable after hours earnings movers

Notable after hours earnings movers: MODN +26.7%, MERU +18.5%, ISSC +6.7%, BNNY -8.6%, RAX -8.3%, QLYS -7.6%

Companies trading higher after hours following earnings/guidance:

MODN +26.7%, MERU +18.5%, ISSC +6.7%, SYUT +5.1%, RICK +5%, CAP +3.1%, PRI +0.7%, CYS +0.6%, MOH +0.5%, WPX +0.1%

Companies trading lower after hours following earnings/guidance:

BNNY -8.6%, RAX -8.3%, QLYS -7.6%, AMKR -3.8%, KS -3.7%, PXD -2.6%, CPST -2.4%, URBN -1.8%, CPSS -1.7%, WBMD -1.3%, SSNI -1.2%

>>> US Close Dow+0,05% S&P+0,16% Nasdaq+0,54%

Closing Market Summary: Stocks Post Modest Gains Ahead of Yellen Testimony

The stock market began the new trading week on a subdued note. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nasdaq, and S&P 500 posted gains between 0.1% and 0.5% with the Nasdaq Composite ending in the lead.

Overall, the session had a ‘wait-and-see' feel as many participants stuck to the sidelines ahead of tomorrow's Humphrey-Hawkins testimony on monetary policy. Although Fed Chair Janet Yellen is expected to strike a similar tone to the latest FOMC policy statement, the testimony will be the first public appearance for the new Fed Chair. Janet Yellen's prepared remarks will be released at 8:30 ET while the Q&A before the House Financial Services Committee is scheduled to begin at 10:00 ET.

The limited participation was reflected in today's trading volume as only 640 million shares changed hands at the NYSE. In fact, the final tally marked the lowest daily volume since January 28.

Seven out of ten sectors posted gains with health care (+0.9%) ending in the lead. The group outperformed throughout the session thanks in part to the relative strength of biotechnology. The iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB 250.72, +4.39) advanced 1.8% and also provided support to the Nasdaq Composite.

Like health care, the remaining countercyclical sectors also finished in the green, posting gains between 0.4% and 0.7%.

Things were a bit more mixed on the cyclical side where financials (+0.1%), technology (+0.3%), and materials (+0.4%) outperformed while consumer discretionary (-0.04%), energy (-0.6%), and industrials (-0.6%) lagged.

Notably, the industrial sector was pressured by broad weakness among transports. The Dow Jones Transportation Average fell 1.0% as 17 of its 20 components ended in the red. The bellwether complex lagged for the second consecutive session after coming up short of its 50-day moving average (7272) on Friday.

Elsewhere, the energy sector finished behind the remaining groups as large components like Chevron (CVX 111.69, -0.36) and ExxonMobil (XOM 89.52, -1.06) lagged. The two Dow members lost 0.3% and 1.2%, respectively.

Treasuries settled modestly higher with the 10-yr yield off one basis point at 2.67%.

Tomorrow, the wholesale inventories report for December will be released at 10:00 ET.

* Nasdaq Composite -0.7% YTD  * S&P 500 -2.6% YTD  * Russell 2000 -3.7% YTD  * Dow Jones Industrial Average -4.7% YTD

>>> Follow up: Republican leaders said to be leaning towards extending debt ceil

Follow up: Republican leaders said to be leaning towards extending debt ceiling limit to Mar 2015, but will request bringing back military benefits that were previously cut (as previously theorized by washington insiders) - financial press
- Will no longer request avoiding the medicare cuts as part of the deal 
- Agree to 'pay for' the debt ceiling increase by extending the sequester program 
- Vote on the debt ceiling could come on Feb 12 
- Reminder: Republicans are meeting tonight to discuss their strategy for the upcoming debt ceiling deadline

FT : A dangerous mistake lies at Bitcoin’s intellectual core

A dangerous mistake lies at Bitcoin’s intellectual core

We need the flexible and timely policy that cryptocurrencies rule out, says Mark Williams
Bitcoins bitcoin©Bloomberg
This weekend Russia became the latest country to crack down on Bitcoin. China has already banned its citizens from buying the “cryptocurrency”, which functions like cash in that it can be transferred anonymously from one person to another without the involvement of a central clearing house. Western regulators are also watching nervously.
The role that Bitcoin can play in facilitating illicit trade has so far attracted most comment. Silk Road, a secret website where contraband was bought and sold, showed that a virtual currency can be more useful to a drug dealer than cash, which must be carried, or bank transfers that leave an electronic trail.

Real though these concerns are, they miss the far more serious threat from the economic ideas behind Bitcoin. An individual or group using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto first described the workings of the virtual currency in 2008. The following year they released the first version of the software that issues Bitcoins and keeps track when of they are spent. By then, many had come to doubt whether dollars, euros and other government-issued currencies would hold their worth – and whether orthodox monetary institutions were the best way to promote prosperity. Bitcoin has gained a following partly because it seems to show us how we can do without money issued by the state. Currency could be nationless.
Keeping money stable and trustworthy has traditionally been a function of national governments. By controlling the money supply and targeting interest rates, the authorities try to promote job creation and economic growth, while preventing runaway inflation that would cause the system of market exchange to break down. Calibrating monetary policy to the needs of the economy is an enormous undertaking. Central banks such as the US Federal Reserve employ hundreds of people to analyse economic data, chart the best path for monetary policy and explain their decisions to the public.
Bitcoin is designed to take these jobs away from central bankers and give it to a simple algorithm instead. Since an autonomous computer system cannot react to complex data such as the unemployment rate or the level of output, Bitcoin uses a fixed formula to control the currency supply. New tokens will be minted at a predetermined rate until a ceiling is reached some time around 2140, after which supply of the currency will stop growing.
Nakamoto’s writings seem to indicate that the motivation, at least in part, was the libertarian ideal of putting money creation beyond the reach of meddling central bankers. But this is a mistake. It ignores the ebbs and flow of economic cycles – a reckless approach that is the equivalent of a doctor giving penicillin to every patient without first checking whether they are suffering from infection, depression or mania.
Some newer competitors to Bitcoin try to correct this, allowing the supply of the currency to grow indefinitely in an attempt to generate low but positive inflation. Others incorporate penalties for hoarding, which are intended to ensure that the tokens circulate more freely. While these are a marked improvement over Bitcoin, they all share the same flaw. The state of the economy does not depend solely on the pace of money creation but also on patterns of human behaviour that are too complex to capture in a simple rule.
That is why we need central bankers who can adjust monetary policy to promote prosperity when people behave in unexpected ways. True, the experts in charge of monetary policy in the years before 2008 failed to prevent the financial crisis. But their decisive action in its aftermath is widely credited with preventing a depression. Without a massive expansion in the money supply, many countries may now be dealing with serious deflation. Yet it is precisely this kind of flexible and timely policy reaction that cryptocurrencies aim to rule out.
The software behind Bitcoin is a remarkable technical achievement but those who tout such systems as a way of saving capitalism are profoundly wrong. Governments should be wary of allowing any virtual currency, unless they first find a way of putting central bankers back in charge.

FT : Serco wins first UK government contract since ban lifted

Serco wins first UK government contract since ban lifted

Serco has won its first contract with the British government since a ban on it bidding for public sector work was lifted 10 days ago.
The outsourcing group saw off rival Babcock to secure a £15m deal with the Ministry of Defence over six years with an option to double the length of the contract.
The work – a retender of an existing Serco contract – involves maintenance and support services at the Royal Air Force missile detection and early warning base at Fylingdales in North Yorkshire – one of the most sensitive military sites in the UK.

Mike Murphy, analyst at Numis, said the deal demonstrated “the government’s willingness to look forward and be commercial, rather than political, in its contract awards”.
Serco is still under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office for allegedly overcharging on electronic monitoring contracts, while staff have been referred to the police for manipulating figures on transferring prisoners to courts in the southeast.
Last week it was also revealed that the group had a multimillion-pound contract to manage community punishments in London cut short amid claims the scheme has been “a disaster”.
Serco was due to run the £37m community payback project for four years until 2016 but concerns were raised when a BBC inquiry alleged that offenders were not properly supervised.
Serco has denied the allegations and the Ministry of Justice said ministers wanted to overhaul all probation services nationally “to ensure a consistent approach”.
An investigation into healthcare services run by Serco in Suffolk also last week called on the company to improve, although it found “no evidence of harm to patients”.
Despite Serco’s troubles, the Cabinet Office decided two weeks ago that it was sufficiently cleansed of recent scandals to be allowed to return to bidding for public sector contracts.
The company is still searching for a new chief executive after Chris Hyman resigned in October in the wake of the scandals.
Government contracts in the pipeline include a £400m, 10-year deal to run the defence estate, which is expected to be awarded imminently.
Serco is competing against Capita for the deal, which involves helping the Defence Infrastructure Organisation manage 2,500 staff and 230,000 acres of land covering conservation sites, offices, barracks, homes and military bases.
Serco’s troubles have raised doubts over the company’s financial position. Last month the group issued a profit warning after admitting the continuing fallout from the scandals meant profits for 2014 would be 10-20 per cent lower than the £277m investors had been expecting.
David Greenall, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, warned at the time that with debt likely to be about £700m this year and earnings falling, the company’s balance sheet was becoming a source of concern.
Duncan Mackison, managing director for defence at Serco, said: “RAF Fylingdales plays a critical role in defending the nation . . . We are delighted that both the MoD and RAF continue to have confidence in our ability to deliver a high quality service.”

(RTR) Vodafone Could Spend $30B-40B on Acquisitions

(Reuters) - Vodafone Group Plc could have the capacity to spend $30 billion to $40 billion on acquisitions in coming years and no deal should be too big if it makes strategic sense, Chief Executive Vittorio Colao said on Monday.

Colao told reporters he was exploring possibilities for big acquisitions on top of investments in Vodafone's existing business after a $130 billion windfall it will get from an asset sale to Verizon Communications later this month.

"We are looking at acquisitions that are sizeable and could transform the company," said the executive at a media roundtable in New York where he laid out his strategy for the world's second-largest mobile operator.

"The theory is that if an acquisition makes sense you should not be worried by the size because shareholders should approve it," he added.

Vodafone may have $40 billion spending money after returning most of the Verizon deal proceeds to shareholders and investing $30 billion in its network over roughly two years if the company sticks to its target for a ratio of two to one for debt to earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, he said.

While the executive was careful not to name any acquisition targets he said Vodafone is keen to build up its fixed-line assets in Europe, its enterprise business around the world and its mobile business in emerging markets.

He said that Vodafone has a roughly 16 to 17 percent share of the total telecommunications market and that it could conceivably increase this to a range of 20 to 23 percent.

Vodafone is selling its 45 percent stake in Verizon Wireless, the biggest U.S. mobile service, to Verizon, which already owns 55 percent of that company and controls the asset.

FT : Buffett-backed BYD behind first all-electric London cab fleet

Buffett-backed BYD behind first all-electric London cab fleet

Warren Buffett-backed Chinese carmaker BYD will launch London’s first ever all-electric taxi fleet on Tuesday, pulling ahead of global rivals such as Nissan in the race to roll out zero emission cabs by 2018.
BYD’s move into London transport comes ahead of a 2018 deadline set by Mayor Boris Johnson for all of the city’s taxis to be zero-emission, which has sparked a battle between manufacturers to develop green vehicles.

The Chinese manufacturer, 9.9 per cent owned by Mr Buffett, will initially launch a fleet of 20 electric cars operated by Thriev, a taxi company, less than two months after supplying the first-ever fully-electric buses to the capital.
“Londoners are typically early adopters to new technology . . . and we are very happy to be first and beat the deadline by a few years. This is where the electric vehicle technology will shine,” Isbrand Ho, managing director of BYD Europe told the Financial Times.
“Look at Boris, he rides a bike to work,” said Mr Ho. “London is at the forefront of zero emission. It is doing the right thing.”
Nissan, the world’s most successful electric car manufacturer, and the London Taxi Company (LTC), which builds the iconic ‘black cab’, are both developing fully-electric models ahead of the 2018 deadline.
Mr Johnsons’ office says taxis account for more than a third of all the exhaust emissions in the city, and the major’s push for zero-emission cabs comes as part of a wider drive by the British government to make the country a major market for electric vehicles.
BYD is also in talks with potential manufacturing partners to start building the electric e6 models in the UK, Mr Ho said, and is in advanced talks with other taxi companies to bring more of their electric vehicles to London.
For the past four decades, a consortium that became part of engineer Manganese Bronze and is now known as LTC manufactured the archetypal FX4 London cab, with its oversized front grille, long, high bonnet and roomy back seat.
But LTC, now owned by Chinese carmaker Geely, finds its market-dominance under pressure from Mercedes-Benz’s Vito vans, Nissan’s entry into the market, and other, zero-emission vehicles from manufacturers such as Metrocab – part of the Frazer-Nash group of companies.
The BYD taxis, available to hire through a phone application similar to those used by companies such as Hailo and Uber, have a driving range of 186 miles and will use a network of battery chargers installed across London by British Gas to refuel.
The company has fleets of electric taxis across China, and in Colombia and Hong Kong, and is in talks to launch a new fleet in Singapore, Mr Ho said.