*PUTIN DIDN'T AGREE ON CEASE-FIRE, RUSSIA NOT PARTY TO CONFLICT

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

BN 09/03 09:02 *KREMLIN SPOKESMAN PESKOV COMMENTS ON PUTIN, POROSHENKO TALKS BN 09/03 09:01 *PUTIN, POROSHENKO LARGELY AGREED ON STEPS NEEDED FOR TRUCE BFW 09/03 08:55 *PUTIN DIDN'T AGREE ON CEASE-FIRE, RUSSIA NOT PARTY TO CONFLICT BFW 09/03 08:52 *PUTIN, POROSHENKO DISCUSSED STEPS TO CEASE-FIRE: PESKOV

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Putin Didn’t Agree on Cease-Fire, Russia Not Party to Conflict 2014-09-03 08:57:52.145 GMT

By Joanna Ossinger Sept. 3 (Bloomberg) -- Putin, Poroshenko discused steps to cease-fire, Putin spokesman Dmitry Peskov says. * NOTE: Earlier, Putin, Poroshenko Agree on Permanent Cease- Fire in Ukraine, Ukraine president said {NSN NBBHIX6K50Y0<Go>}

For Related News and Information: First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>} First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Joanna Ossinger at +1-212-617-7789 or jossinger@bloomberg.net

(BFW) Goldman Sachs Survey Shows 9 Banks Expected to Fail ECB Tests


Goldman Sachs Survey Shows 9 Banks Expected to Fail ECB Tests
2014-09-03 08:20:22.74 GMT


By Jurjen van de Pol
Sept. 3 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs cites outcome of
survey among 125 institutional investors, according to note.
* Expects on avg 9 banks will fail tests
* Says risk perception of banks hasn’t materially changed
since Oct. 2013 survey
* Raises aggregate recapitalization est. to EU51b vs EU28b
* NOTE: ECB scheduled to release results of tests, examination
of balance sheets of 128 euro-area lenders next month


For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Jurjen van de Pol in Frankfurt at +49-69-9204-1104 or
jvandepol@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
James Ludden at +44-20-7673-2645 or
jludden@bloomberg.net

(MS) 2020 Vision: Long Live the Expansion...S&P 3000 in 2020?

2020 Vision: Long Live the Expansion

The US expansion is more than five years old, but business cycles don't die of old age. Herein we discuss why this could be the longest US expansion ever, and how to gauge when it could end.

We believe a prolonged period of deleveraging in the US, coupled with an uneven global recovery, are just two of the reasons why this could prove to be the longest US expansion – ever. Supporting our theory are:

* The world economy is not in sync. Major regional economies are at different points along the growth cycle. In general, DM is leading while EM is lagging.
* Volatility in the US continues to trend lower, which can extend the life of expansions.
* Deleveraging in the US is ongoing, albeit largely complete, and balance sheet priorities have shifted.
* Interest payments on debt burdens are ultra-low, and household debt dynamics suggest there exists a sizable cushion protecting consumers in a rising interest rate environment.
* Capital spending and inventories do not look stretched.
* Corporate management hubris and other corporate metrics of overheating remain muted.
* Several broad economic indicators in the US have only just reached “normal” expansionary levels and are far from looking unsustainable.

(BofA-ML) European Banking...upside risks dominate

…and around we go. Upside risks dominate

* QE: capturing the imagination
Data is poor enough and inflation low enough that we now
expect further ECB innovation. We think Draghi’s Jackson
Hole speech demands he follow with action; a reversal of
the early summer ECB position. Looser TLTRO
requirements are a possible first step but the end point
could be QE on a grand scale – why not equities, or noneuro
government bonds? Key for us is we are entering a
period where the possibilities may appear endless – fertile
ground for bank stocks.

* AQR/ stress tests: likely a wash
With its other hat on, the ECB will announce its AQR and
stress test results at the end of October. We see the
uncertainty not as where potential underprovisioning lies or
where capital and funding weaknesses are. Six years on,
the market has good clarity on these; we run our own AQR,
analysing write-offs and broadly-defined problem credit to
adjust provisioning quality. The question is what the ECB is
going to ask the banks to do about their weaknesses. Our
base case remains it will ask little – a wasted opportunity.

* …but you never know
Should the ECB find the political backing to deliver a robust
stress test, we see capital risks at the Greek banks,
Popular, Sabadell and MPS. Key Buys are euro area banks
where we see low AQR tail risk but that offer attractive
valuation and QE gearing include Commerz, Intesa, BNP,
Bank of Ireland and Caixabank.

* Margins: rising before falling
Ultimately, very low rates are bad for margins. However,
the benefits of higher liability spreads from the collapse in
sovereign yields will come through quickly, while the
pressure on asset margins will be slow. We see customer
spreads benefiting in 2015 – but analyse the pressure from
fading carry trade income, especially in Spain. Euro area
banks will struggle to meet NII targets further out: low credit
demand, low rates and a flat curve are a difficult
combination. QE compresses credit spreads - and is a
response to weak GDP, not a complement to recovery

* UK offers real growth
In contrast to the central-bank dominated, low growth euro
area, we see the UK offering “normal” stocks, with
accelerating domestic revenue growth and lower-for-longer
bad debts. Capital uncertainty has fallen sharply: owners
can look forward to rapidly and sustainably rising cash
dividends. We have Buy ratings on Barclays, HSBC,
Lloyds, Paragon and StanChart

* M&A: one day
Fragmented industries with weak top line growth are classic
M&A candidates. Were the AQR to prove robust, it could
pave the way for the cross-border consolidation the ECB
desires. However, our own AQR suggests material potential
provisioning shortfalls in many M&A candidates. M&A plays
with credible provisions are Commerzbank and Erste

(Les Echos) Franck Riboud gives operational management of Danone

Franck Riboud gives operational management of Danone

Franck Riboud, Danone's boss, became chairman of the leader for dairy products. Emmanuel Faber became CEO.
Change in governance at Danone. Franck Riboud, fifty-eight, disengages from the operational management of the group to take over the presidency and thus be able to concentrate entirely on strategic thinking about the future of the company in the long term. The creation of a strategic committee, which he will chair, has also been approved by the board of directors of French food group. Major decisions should be done in the coming months, as the sale of the division of medical supply business and new acquisitions in the areas of child nutrition or water bottle.
Emmanuel Faber, fifty years, until COO, became CEO and be responsible for the operational management as of October 1. Bernard Hours, fifty-eight, also previously Chief Operating Officer, will leave the group. However, it should keep "links with Danone," said Laurent Sacchi, Managing Director at the Presidency.
Good governance
Arrived in 1997 in the group, Emmanuel Faber there was successively in charge of development and particularly in mergers and acquisitions and finance before becoming the head of Asia at a time that was particularly difficult to manage: Chinese partner, Mr Zhong, who the French group had formed a joint venture under the name of Wahaha, did not respect the agreements between the two companies. Danone could not enforce its rights against the Chinese court, although Mr. Zhong has marketed its own account of manufactured products for the joint venture with Danone. After this painful and costly for the group episode, Emmanuel Faber returned to France, where he was appointed Chief Operating Officer.
The reorganization of the group is "in no case" to any challenge to the management of Franck Riboud, says Laurent Sacchi: "On the contrary, the board confirmed in his position as Chairman and entrusted the strategic thinking on the future of Danone. "Nothing in the statutes of the group does not provide a date when Franck Riboud leave. Its mandate is voted in general meeting every three years.
Separate the roles of chairman and CEO is, for many, a sign of good governance. In France, the CAC 40, such a structure is however an exception. Until the announcement Tuesday by Danone, 35 groups with a board of directors, 27 leaders combined the two roles of chairman and CEO. Only eight had dissociated functions (this is the case at Airbus Group, AlcatelLucent, BNP Paribas, Credit Agricole SA, Gemalto, Pernod Ricard, Sanofi and Solvay). Danone joins that small group. On financial markets , investors may fear that the former CEO did not change his leadership, unless they prefer to focus on the personality of Emmanuel Faber.

(Jefferies) Glencore - NExt Big Deal...

* Key Takeaway
Now that the Xstrata acquisition has been fully integrated and Glencore is
entering a period of strong FCF, a Glencore bid for Anglo American could
be coming, as we have long expected (see our report from Feb 2013 here).
GLEN shares should outperform AAL shares in the medium term, but we see an
increasing possibility of Glencore buying Anglo next year. GLEN continues to be
one of our top picks in the sector.

* The strategic rationale for Glencore to bid for Anglo: When it acquired Xstrata
last year, Glencore 1) upgraded the quality of its asset portfolio and thereby reduced the
cyclicality of its earnings, 2) increased the amount of control it has over the supply of
commodities, 3) provided more feed to grow its trading business, and 4) unlocked value
from synergies. We would expect the same benefits to result from a Glencore acquisition of
Anglo American. Media reports have speculated about a potential combination of these two
companies for the past two years. Anglo's CEO, Mark Cutifani, commented in a WSJ story
just yesterday that Anglo is open to a takeover if the price is right. Our analysis indicates that
Glencore will be best positioned to do this deal if Glencore shares outperform Anglo shares
over the next 6-12 months, as we expect.

* Big synergy potential: We estimate that a Glencore acquisition of Anglo would create
at least $1.5bn of operational and revenue synergies per year. Our analysis indicates that
an offer of 5.3 GLEN shares for each AAL share (we would not expect Glencore to offer any
cash) would be about 12% EPS accretive for Glencore by year 3. This merger ratio would
imply a 25% premium to Anglo's current share price. If Glencore shares outperform, the
required ratio to get to a 25% premium would decline, and a deal could get done at a ratio
closer to 5.0.

* Antitrust risk is manageable but not immaterial: As we discuss in detail herein,
antitrust risk relating to a Glencore acquisition of Anglo could be an issue in platinum,
copper, and South African coal. However, structural remedies could overcome these hurdles.

* White knights unlikely to emerge: Our analysis indicates that a white knight for Anglo
will not emerge, although Rio cannot be totally ruled out. The lower the probability of a
white knight emerging, the more likely it is that Glencore acquires Anglo.

* Valuation/Risks
Glencore is one of our top picks in the sector. The main risks for the company are operational,
financial and macro (China). GLEN trades at a 2015E P/E of 13.3x and EV/EBITDA of 8.1x.