(Seek.Alpha) Substantial Upside As USA Truck's Turnaround

challenges and opportunities facing the trucking business and barely mentions SCS.

From a management perspective, it makes tons of sense to focus on the trucking business. The SCS business is doing well, and the trucking business's value will dwarf SCS if the turnaround's momentum continues. However, this is exactly why a spin-off makes sense: it would allow SCS management to focus on growing the business even faster, allow the trucking management to dedicate all of their time to the turnaround, and allow investors to more clearly see and value each business. In addition, a spin-off of SCS could make USAK a more viable acquisition candidate, as a potential acquirer could pick up just the trucks and drivers without paying for the SCS division they may or may not want.

Summary

To wrap this up, an investment in USAK at today's prices offers substantial upside from either a continued turnaround towards industry average operating metric or an acquisition at a substantial premium. With two activists holding large positions in the company and a potential strategic acquirer holding another large position, the board will be motivated to continue executing on the turnaround plan and delivering shareholder value.

(Challenges) PIB, prostitution et drogue: l'Italie joue le p

PIB, prostitution et drogue: l'Italie joue le profit, la France la vertu

L'office des statistiques italien va incorporer l'économie souterraine dans le calcul de la richesse nationale comme l'exige Bruxelles. L'Insee opte pour la double comptabilité. Matteo Renzi, le Premier ministre italien, peut dire merci aux pontes de la mafia pour la prospérité d'une partie non négligeable de leurs activités économiques... On pourrait croire à une blague, mais l'affaire est très sérieuse. L'agence de statistiques Istat, l'équivalent de l'Insee en France, a annoncé qu'elle allait prendre en compte les revenus générés par la prostitution, la drogue et les divers trafics (cigarettes, alcool...) pour calculer le Produit intérieur brut (PIB) de l'Italie.

Contacté par Challenges.fr, Gian Paolo Oneto, le patron de la direction de la comptabilité nationale à l'Istat, se défend en arguant que "les règles sont les mêmes pour tous les pays de l'Union européenne. Eurostat nous a donné les 'guides lines'. Nous devons les appliquer !"

Pour justifier l'incorporation de l'économie souterraine dans le calcul de la richesse produite, le fisc italien se réfère à un alinéa d'ESA 2010. Ce texte, rédigé par Eurostat (l'agence en charge des statistiques de l'UE) définit les nouvelles normes comptables européennes. Elles rentreront en vigueur en septembre 2014. A la page 15, le document stipule: " La définition d'une transaction implique que l'interaction entre les unités institutionnelles se fasse d'un commun accord (…) Les activités économiques illégales doivent être considérés comme des transactions quand toutes les unités parties prenantes le font par accord mutuel. De ce fait, achats, ventes ou troc de drogues illégales ou d’objets volés sont des transactions quand le vol ne l’est pas." 

Comment évaluer l'économie illicite?

Oui, mais comment évaluer le montant des transactions illégales sur le sol italien ? On imagine mal un membre de la Camorra, la mafia napolitaine, téléphoner à un statisticien de l'Istat pour lui faire part de ses gains et de la croissance de son activité ! "Effectivement, c'est pas la bonne méthode", répond hilare Gian Paolo Oneto.

Après avoir repris son sérieux, il détaille: "Nous allons nous appuyer sur les données de la police et de la justice qui ont une bonne connaissance du volume et des prix des produits stupéfiants et des services des prostitués. Nous ferons appel aux ONG qui travaillent avec les drogués et les prostitués." Avant de retourner à sa besogne, il lâche à la dérobée: "Vous savez, en Italie, nous avons une tradition dans l'évaluation de l'économie souterraine !"

De son côté, l'un des porte-paroles d'Eurostat s'étonne de la polémique que peut susciter la prise en compte des revenus de la drogue et de la prostitution dans le calcul du PIB. "Nous ne faisons que nous conformer aux normes internationales ! Les Etats-Unis les ont mis en application l'année dernière. Et puis le principe d'inclure les revenus de l'économie illégale était déjà inscrit dans les textes européens depuis 1995 avec les normes ESA 95. Il n'y a donc rien de nouveau !"

Quoiqu'il en soit, ESA 2010 est une aubaine pour l'Italie, l'un des "hommes malades" de la zone euro. En treize ans, l'Italie a connu quatre périodes de récession. Et en 2011, le pays a frôlé de près la faillite suite à l'attaque des marchés et à l'augmentation des taux d'intérêt sur sa dette abyssale, qui dépasse les 120% de son PIB.

Une aubaine pour le gouvernement italien

Du coup, la prise en compte de l'argent de la drogue et de la prostitution est plutôt une bonne nouvelle pour le pays... Selon la Banque d'Italie, l'économie criminelle représenterait 10,9% du PIB en 2012. D'après une étude de l'institut italien Demoskopika, le chiffre d'affaires de la 'Ndrangheta a atteint 53 milliards d'euros en 2013, presque autant que Peugeot et Airbus! Selon les Nations-Unies, cette fois, les quatre organisations mafieuses ('Ndrangheta, Cosa Nostra, Calabre, Sacra Corona Unita) dégagent un chiffre d'affaires de 116 milliards d'euros, soit 5,9% du PIB!

Ce fait dire à Giuseppe Di Taranto, économiste et professeur à l'université de Rome, contacté par Bloomberg, que "Matteo Renzi aura une plus grande marge de manœuvre budgétaire." Il ajoute: "même si cela est dur à quantifier, il est certain que ça aura un impact positif sur la croissance."

De quoi redonner le sourire au gouvernement italien. Ce dernier a annoncé il y a peu des prévisions de l'ordre de 0,8% de croissance pour 2014. En comptabilisant les revenus tirés des activités mafieuses, la croissance pourrait dépasser les 1%, voire même avoisiner les 1,6%. Ce qui ferait de l'Italie l'un des moteurs de la zone euro !

Et en France ?

Pour l'Insee, il n'est pas question d'inclure l'économie illégale dans le calcul du PIB. Joint par Challenges, l'organisme public est catégorique: "Nous n'incorporons pas les activités illégales dans ses estimations, dans la mesure où les circonstances dans lesquelles s'effectuent ces activités (dépendance des consommateurs de stupéfiants, esclavage sexuel dans certains cas) ne permettent pas de considérer que les parties prenantes s'engagent toujours librement dans ces transactions." En France, les activités économiques échappant à l'impôt sont estimées à moins de 10% du PIB selon une étude du très sérieux institut allemand de veille économique IAW.

L'Insee tient, par ailleurs, à opérer un distinguo entre, d'un côté, l'économie souterraine, interdite, et de l'autre l'activité dissimulée. Cette dernière (travail au noir dans la construction ou contrebande de tabac par exemple) "n'est généralement pas de nature illégale, même si elle s'exerce dans un cadre qui ne respecte pas toutes les dispositions légales." Et d'ajouter: "C'est pourquoi les comptes nationaux incorporent depuis longtemps dans leurs estimations des redressements pour tenir compte de l'activité dissimulée. L'ensemble des corrections au titre de l'activité dissimulée représente 3,4% du PIB français en base 2010."

Une double comptabilité

Pour clarifier la situation, l'Insee assure que la prostitution est partiellement déclarée au fisc. "Les revenus correspondants sont bien pris en compte par l'Insee dans la mesure du PIB. La prostitution clandestine, en revanche, en est exclue", précise l'institut de statistiques.

Mais l'Insee reconnaît qu'une correction sera apportée au PIB pour être conforme aux exigences de Bruxelles. Mais, elle promet que cette dernière ne figurera pas dans les données publiées sur son site Internet.

De fait, la France se doit de respecter les normes européennes y compris sur le plan statistique. Cependant, l'Union européenne laisse la possibilité aux Etats de calculer comme ils veulent le PIB au niveau national. Mais par souci d'harmonisation, les 29 membres de l'UE doivent appliquer les normes ESA 2010 et les transmettre à Eurostat. A défaut, elles ne seraient plus comparables.

FT : Piketty findings undercut by errors

Piketty findings undercut by errors

Thomas Piketty’s book, ‘Capital in the Twenty-First Century’, has been the publishing sensation of the year. Its thesis of rising inequality tapped into the zeitgeist and electrified the post-financial crisis public policy debate. But, according to a Financial Times investigation, the rock-star French economist appears to have got his sums wrong. The data underpinning Professor Piketty’s 577-page tome, which has dominated best-seller lists in recent weeks, contain a series of errors that skew his findings. The FT found mistakes and unexplained entries in his spreadsheets, similar to those which last year undermined the work on public debt and growth of Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff. The central theme of Prof Piketty’s work is that wealth inequalities are heading back up to levels last seen before the first world war. The investigation undercuts this claim, indicating there is little evidence in Prof Piketty’s original sources to bear out the thesis that an increasing share of total wealth is held by the richest few. Prof Piketty, 43, provides detailed sourcing for his estimates of wealth inequality in Europe and the US over the past 200 years. In his spreadsheets, however, there are transcription errors from the original sources and incorrect formulas. It also appears that some of the data are cherry-picked or constructed without an original source. For example, once the FT cleaned up and simplified the data, the European numbers do not show any tendency towards rising wealth inequality after 1970. An independent specialist in measuring inequality shared the FT’s concerns. Contacted by the FT, Prof Piketty said he had used "a very diverse and heterogeneous set of data sources ... [on which] one needs to make a number of adjustments to the raw data sources. "I have no doubt that my historical data series can be improved and will be improved in the future ... but I would be very surprised if any of the substantive conclusion about the long-run evolution of wealth distributions was much affected by these improvements," he said. His contention to have found a "central contradiction of capitalism" has in recent months made him a hero of the left. Although his conclusions have stirred controversy, there has, until now, been near unanimous praise for the quality of his statistical work. On a tour of the US last month, Prof Piketty met Jacob Lew, US Treasury secretary, gave a presentation to the White House Council of Economic Advisers and lectured at the International Monetary Fund and the UN. Nobel prize-winning economists have heaped praised on Mr Piketty’s work. Professor Paul Krugman of Princeton University, said it was safe to say the book "will be the most important economics book of the year – and maybe of the decade". Professor Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University said Prof Piketty’s "fundamental contribution" was the provision of data on the distribution of wealth. It was the subject of laudatory reviews in the Financial Times and other publications. In Britain, Ed Miliband, Labour leader, told the Evening Standard: "I’m in the early stages of the book. In a way, he is symptomatic of what people are actually feeling". In his response to the FT, Prof Piketty said that more recent data not in his work showed "the rise in top wealth shares in the US in recent decades has been even larger than what I show in my book".

Rosneft May Buy Stake in North Atlantic Drilling From Seadrill

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Rosneft May Buy Stake in North Atlantic Drilling From Seadrill 2014-05-24 12:54:29.250 GMT

By Stephen Bierman and Elena Mazneva May 24 (Bloomberg) -- Russian oil producer may buy “significant stake” in North Atlantic Drilling under cooperation agreement signed at St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. * North Atlantic to enter Russian onshore drilling mkt, get L- T onshore, offshore drilling contracts, Rosneft says in statement * Rosneft, Seadrill, North Atlantic Drilling sign letter on 6 harsh environment offshore drilling rigs, with possible expansion to up to 9: statement * Co. doesn’t disclose stake, price in statement * NOTE: Seadrill owns 70% of unit

Link to Company News:{SDRL NO <Equity> CN <GO>} Link to Company News:{NADL NO <Equity> CN <GO>} Link to Company News:{ROSN RM <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information: First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>} First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the reporter on this story: Elena Mazneva in Moscow at +7-495-771-7729 or emazneva@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Torrey Clark at +7-495-771-7709 or tclark8@bloomberg.net

Germany Plans to Nationalize Toll Collect Operations: Focus

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Germany Plans to Nationalize Toll Collect Operations: Focus 2014-05-24 12:50:37.241 GMT

By Cornelius Rahn May 24 (Bloomberg) -- German Transport Minister Alexander Dobrindt wants govt to take over truck-toll venture to ensure income beyond 2018, Focus magazine reports, citing internal report to transport committee of German parliament. * Toll Collect system needs to be revised for extension to all 30,000 km of federal roads * Ministry calculations show tender to find new operators, setting up new system would take 6 yrs * Extending existing contract by 3 yrs not feasible * Germany has option to nationalize Toll Collect by Feb. 28, 2015 * Deutsche Telekom spokeswoman declined immediately to comment. Representatives for Daimler didn’t immediately return calls seeking comment. * NOTE: Toll Collect venture includes Daimler, Deutsche Telekom as partners, runs commercial-vehicle tolls on country’s Autobahn limited-access highways

For Related News and Information: First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO> First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story: Cornelius Rahn in Berlin at +49-30-70010-6212 or crahn2@bloomberg.net To contact the editor responsible for this story: Kenneth Wong at +49-30-70010-6215 or kwong11@bloomberg.net

Pfizer Likely to Say Won’t Make Formal Bid for AstraZeneca: Sky

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

BN 05/24 12:05 *PFIZER LIKELY TO SAY WON'T MAKE FORMAL BID FOR ASTRAZENECA: SKY

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Pfizer Likely to Say Won’t Make Formal Bid for AstraZeneca: Sky 2014-05-24 12:06:22.738 GMT

By Mike Harrison May 24 (Bloomberg) -- Pfizer likely to issue a statement on May 26 which will confirm its intention not to make a formal bid at this stage for AstraZeneca, Sky says, citing unidentified senior sources.

Link to Company News:{AZN LN <Equity> CN <GO>} Link to Company News:{PFE US <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information: First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>} First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mike Harrison at +44-20-7073-3564 or mharrison5@bloomberg.net

InterContinental Hotels Rejects Takeover Bid From U.S.: Sky

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

InterContinental Hotels Rejects Takeover Bid From U.S.: Sky 2014-05-24 12:03:09.566 GMT

By Max Julius May 24 (Bloomberg) -- InterContinental Hotels Group has rejected a takeover bid from the U.S. that valued the co. at ~GBP6b, Sky News says, citing unidentified sources. Sky also reported today: * InterContinental’s board met a few weeks ago to consider offer; dismissed it as too low * U.S.-based bidder not identified * Co. is braced for the bidder or a rival to return * Unidentified spokeswoman for InterContinental declined to comment

Link to Company News:IHG LN <Equity> CN <GO>

For Related News and Information: First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO> First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story: Max Julius in London at +44-20-3525-8917 or mjulius4@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Max Julius at +44-20-3525-8917 or mjulius4@bloomberg.net

Lafarge CEO Confident of Timeline for Holcim Merger: Le Temps

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Lafarge CEO Confident of Timeline for Holcim Merger: Le Temps 2014-05-24 09:45:56.397 GMT

By Patrick Winters May 24 (Bloomberg) -- Swiss newspaper Le Temps cites interview w/ Lafarge CEO Bruno Lafont. Lafont also cited as saying: * Lafarge-Holcim asset-sale proposals will be made public this yr * Lafarge-Holcim merger won’t be affected by French foreign takeover decree * NOTE: April 7, Holcim-Lafarge Seek Disposals for $40 Billion Merger Backing NSN N3OA1U6TTDSP<GO> * NOTE: May 15, EU to Examine French Anti-Takeover Decree ‘Very Thoroughly’ NSN N5M4756S973F<GO>

For Related News and Information: First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO> First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story: Patrick Winters in Zurich at +41-44-224-4117 or pwinters3@bloomberg.net To contact the editor responsible for this story: Simon Thiel at +44-20-7673-2814 or sthiel1@bloomberg.net

NY Post : Amazon escalates standoff with publisher Hachette

Amazon escalates standoff with publisher Hachette

Amazon escalates standoff with publisher Hachette

If you’re hoping to pre-order books by J.K. Rowling, Michael Connelly and other Hachette Book Group authors, you’ll have to go somewhere besides Amazon.com.
An ongoing standoff between Amazon and one of the leading New York publishers has intensified. The online retailer, which already had been slowing delivery on a wide range of Hachette titles, has removed pre-order buttons for such books as Connelly’s “The Burning Room” and Rowling’s “The Silkworm,” a detective story she wrote under the pen name Robert Galbraith.
Previous changes had been more subtle. The listing for the paperback of J.D. Salinger’s “Nine Stories” says delivery will take three to five weeks and offers “Similar items at a lower price,” including a collection of Ernest Hemingway stories published by Scribner.
“We are doing everything in our power to find a solution to this difficult situation, one that best serves our authors and their work, and that preserves our ability to survive and thrive as a strong and author-centric publishing company,” Hachette said in a statement Friday issued through spokeswoman Sophie Cottrell.
Amazon declined to comment. Numerous Hachette authors have criticized Amazon in recent weeks, including Sherman Alexie and James Patterson, who on his Facebook page noted that the purchase of books written by him, Malcolm Gladwell, Nicholas Sparks and others had been made more difficult.
“What I don’t understand about this particular battle tactic is how it is in the best interest of Amazon customers,” Patterson wrote. “It certainly doesn’t appear to be in the best interest of authors.”
Amazon and Hachette are reportedly at odds over terms for e-book prices, at a time when Amazon is in a position of strength and vulnerability. The Seattle-based company is the most powerful force in the book market, believed to have a share of more than 60 percent of e-book sales and at least a third of book sales overall. Rivals have struggled to compete with Amazon’s discounts and customer service.
But recent earnings reports have been disappointing and Amazon’s stock prices, which surged for years despite narrow profits, have dropped sharply in 2014.
Amazon has a history of aggressive actions with publishers, most dramatically in 2010 when it removed the buy buttons for releases by Macmillan, where authors include Jonathan Franzen, Bill O’Reilly and Augusten Burroughs. The issue was also e-books. Apple was about to launch its iBookstore and Macmillan, Hachette and other publishers, worried over Amazon’s $9.99 offerings for popular e-books, wanted Amazon to accept a new system – the agency model – that would allow publishers to set the prices.
Amazon relented, but the system unraveled after the U.S. Department of Justice sued Apple and five publishers in 2012 for alleged price fixing. The publishers, including Macmillan and Hachette, settled and a federal judge in New York last year ruled against Apple.
Other books currently being delayed or otherwise disrupted include Tina Fey’s “Bossypants,” Gladwell’s “The Tipping Point” and Brad Stone’s “The Everything Store,” a critical portrait of Amazon and founder Jeff Bezos.

Barron's : What Will Google Buy Next? 12 Potential Targets

What Will Google Buy Next? 12 Potential Targets
Why Ruckus Wireless, ST Microelectronics, Splunk, and Nuance Communications could all be on Google's shopping list.

With the Nasdaq Composite Index up just 0.2% for the year, and with tech stocks in double-digit declines in recent months, thoughts turn to the amusing parlor game of guessing who might get bought.

Of course, there's no guarantee any deals will get done in this environment. Many stocks may now be trading at bargain prices from the viewpoint of a rich acquirer, but that means they're also probably fetching far less than what the target company thinks it's worth. In any event, if you want to play the game, there's no better place to look for a cash-rich acquirer than Google (ticker: GOOGL).

Analysts estimate Google will generate $17.5 billion in free cash flow, boosting its already sizable $59 billion hoard this year. And the search giant is nothing if not acquisitive, doing 176 transactions in the past five years, including minority stakes and outright acquisitions, according to data from Bloomberg.

Past deals have been significant, including the November 2006 purchase of YouTube for $1.65 billion; the March 2008 purchase of ad network DoubleClick, for $3.1 billion; the May 2012 purchase of Motorola Mobility for $12.9 billion; and the acquisition, in February, of home automation start-up Nest Labs for $3.2 billion.

Google has even said it may need as much as $30 billion of its cash overseas to make acquisitions in coming years, Bloomberg's Brian Womack reported just last week, citing a regulatory filing.

Adding fuel to the fire, Google recently instituted a third class of stock, the so-called C shares, which have the same economic terms, but no voting rights, making it easier for Google to do stock-based deals without diluting control.

So what might Google buy next?

Consider the logic of Google's business. From a thousand-foot view, "Google is like the ultimate tax on the Internet," says Mark Mahaney, who follows the stock for RBC Capital Markets. Meaning, Google always finds ways to extract money from use of the Internet in its myriad forms, whether that is via Web searching on a traditional desktop computer or a phone running Google's Android software.

Android, which it gives away free, extends Google's ad sales to mobile. His point: If not directly, Google nevertheless eventually finds a way to extract a penny.

Looked at another way, Google's M&A follows the playbook set down by Leonard Kleinrock, a UCLA professor of computer science who was one of the founders of the Internet. In a 2003 article, Kleinrock wrote that while it has become pretty ubiquitous, there's still a need to make the 'Net even more pervasive, a kind of invisible digital nervous system linking everything and constantly enmeshed everywhere in our digital lives.

For Google, those are the magic words: The more the Internet is pervasive, the more it can collect in "taxes" for helping us use it on a daily basis. And so Google has gone after things that can make the Internet more present at every moment, like Nest, which promises to make your home and all the activity in it another point on its network.

Looking at the unfinished business of the Internet, as Kleinrock would describe it, there are still areas where Google could help extend connectivity. As I was writing this column, media reports claimed Google is working with Ruckus Wireless (RKUS), which has spent years putting Wi-Fi hotspots in metro areas to extend wireless Web access for phones and tablets. With a market value of $804 million, it could be snapped up by Google in the blink of an eye.

If not Ruckus, there are a number of Wi-Fi service providers that would also be small change, including iPass (IPAS), Boingo Wireless (WIFI), and Gogo (GOGO). With Comcast (CMCSA) talking about building out Wi-Fi networks as well, these companies could all be acquisition candidates if Google doesn't take them.

GOOGLE ALSO NEEDS TO CONSIDER wearables, says RBC's Mahaney. Naturally, since wearables promise to be the extension of the Internet into further corners of our lives. Closely held wearables makers Jawbone and Fitbit fit the bill. A more dramatic step for Google would be to buy one of the chip makers that are enabling semiconductors for wearable technology. That could include Europe's STMicroelectronics (STM), which has a market value of $8.5 billion, or smaller players such as $211 million QuickLogic (QUIK). NXP Semiconductors (NXPI) might be an excellent target to consider, but at $15 billion, it's a stretch.

Outside of the devices themselves, somebody has to help the world manage and understand the many millions of such wearable computers that will proliferate. Splunk (SPLK), which came public in 2012, is popular for its data-sifting software that helps companies analyze tons and tons of data, from online comments to video images. Morgan Stanley tech analyst Francois Meunier recently remarked to me that Splunk could end up being "the Google of the Internet of Things," referring to the collection of connected devices beyond traditional computers.

At $5.4 billion, Splunk would be a manageable deal, though closely held competitor Sumo Logic is also growing fast and could be an interesting alternative.

Another part of making the Internet ubiquitous is to make it operate behind the scenes in a transparent fashion, and speech-recognition technology is important in that regard. Despite Google's own progress with the technology, buying a prominent supplier like Nuance Communications (NUAN), at $5 billion, might have some appeal.

ONE OF THE BIGGEST CHALLENGES for Google is to make sure it keeps a hand in all Internet activity. There is always a danger it will lose out as that activity migrates away from basic search. Facebook (FB) poses a greater and greater threat to Google, in theory, as more and more activity disappears within its maws. But Facebook is too big to buy.

The other threat is Amazon.com (AMZN), whose transactions threaten the retail ad selling that Google does. For the moment, Google is doing fine just selling ads to Amazon, which Mahaney says is among the top 10 buyers of keywords on Google, along with eBay (EBAY).

The next big challenge for Google will be China. The company's service has been shut out of the largest Internet market. And that market contains a surging amount of retail activity in the hands of Chinese companies that Google can't legally buy, including social networker Tencent Holdings (2988.Hong Kong) and retail giant Alibaba Group Holding.

Will any of it happen? Your guess could be as good as mine, but it certainly is fun to speculate.