WSJ : Falling Oil Prices Test OPEC Unity



Falling Oil Prices Test OPEC Unity

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries Knows It Must Cut Production to Lift Prices; Unclear is Whether Its Members Will Agree
As global crude prices plunged earlier this month, Venezuela’s foreign minister asked to see Saudi Arabia’s top oil official at a climate-change conference on Margarita Island, off the South American coast.

Ali al-Naimi, the Saudi oil minister, was expecting a plea to reduce oil output and bolster markets. In anticipation, according to people familiar with the matter, he brought a message to Venezuelan Foreign Minister Rafael Ramirez : Saudi Arabia won’t cut production on its own.


Mr. Naimi is expected to repeat the message to delegates at a meeting of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries in Vienna later this month, according to Saudi officials and fellow OPEC officials.

At stake is whether OPEC, a group of some of the world’s biggest oil producers, can still operate as a global cartel amid infighting and expanded global production, notably from the U.S. shale-oil boom. A failure to broker a deal for a collective cut would weaken the group’s already-sagging influence over global prices.

“The upcoming OPEC meeting is going to be the most difficult one during this century,” said Mohammad al-Sabban, a former senior adviser to Mr. Naimi. “It seems that OPEC has forgotten how to cooperate.”

Within the group, officials are increasingly worried its divisions contribute to weaker prices. “If OPEC fails to reach an agreement,” one OPEC official said, “oil prices will keep on falling.”

The group now pumps about half a million more barrels a day than its target of 30 million barrels a day, according to the International Energy Agency. Members are considering a commitment to rein in production to the group’s target level, OPEC delegates said, effectively cutting production sharply.

Together, OPEC member countries still produce more than one-third of the world’s oil supply. Since 1984, the cartel has reduced output 11 times to address oil price falls, according to Deutsche Bank, with cuts totaling 1.24 million barrels a day, on average.

Each time, Brent crude prices, the international benchmark, rose in the two to three months following OPEC action, Deutsche found.

A collective move to cut output could boost prices, but it would also rob OPEC members of revenue. It is unclear how long such vulnerable OPEC economies as Venezuela and Nigeria could afford to limit production without reopening the spigots.

Unlike past meetings, this month’s gathering poses an added dilemma. By keeping oil prices high, the group would encourage oil investments, including U.S. shale production. The U.S. has flooded markets with new crude, contributing to lower prices, but its shale production requires relatively high oil prices to make money.

That is an incentive for OPEC to do nothing for now—if members can survive the pain of lower prices in the short term.

Privately, Saudi Arabia doubts the 11 other OPEC members would live up to a collective commitment to cut output, according to Saudi officials and Saudi oil-industry executives. And Riyadh isn’t willing to bear the pain of a unilateral cut, these officials and executives said, fearful of losing customers amid the current squabbling.

The uncompromising Saudi stance stems from the 1980s, when Saudi Arabia cut production sharply to bolster oil prices as substantial new oil supply emerged from the North Sea and the U.K.

Instead of standing by Riyadh, other OPEC producers kept pumping and tried to wrest away market share.

“Saudi Arabia has definitely made it clear that defending the oil market is a collective responsibility, and no member country should expect Saudi Arabia to swing alone,” said Mr. Sabban, the former aide to Mr. Naimi. “If there is no agreement on this very basic principle, then Saudi Arabia will continue defending its market share.”

Saudi Arabia, with its large cash reserves, is cushioned from short-term price weakness. Still, the kingdom needs Brent to average $99 a barrel to balance its budget this fiscal year, Deutsche Bank estimates. It is currently trading just under $80 a barrel, a four-year low.

While oil-market dynamics are complex, two broad issues underlie the commodity’s recent fall. The IEA estimates the U.S. is adding roughly one million barrels of oil a day each year to global supply, thanks to shale oil. The return of an unexpectedly large amount of supply from such strife-ridden countries as Libya and Iraq has added to the glut.

Meanwhile, growth in global oil demand has slowed, particularly in Asia. In March, the IEA expected annual oil consumption to grow by 1.35 million barrels of oil a day in 2014. Its estimate has since nearly halved, with the paring of forecasts for global growth.

Repercussions of the OPEC debate go well beyond the borders of its members. Lower oil prices are slamming Russia, for example, which is already squeezed by Western sanctions and a tumbling currency.

U.S. consumers are benefiting from lower prices at the pump. But lower prices also shrink cash flow at many U.S. oil companies, particularly those engaged in relatively expensive shale-oil production.

If weaker prices force some producers—particularly U.S. shale producers—to abandon their most expensive wells, then the market could eventually work in OPEC’s favor.

In early October, Saudi officials led by Nasser al-Dossary, Saudi Arabia’s national representative to OPEC, attended a seminar in New York organized by an energy consultancy. Mr. Dossary privately communicated to attendees that Riyadh wasn’t alarmed by the price slide and wouldn’t unilaterally cut its output, according to people familiar with the matter.

Attendees interpreted the remarks as a signal Saudi Arabia would try to undermine North American shale-oil production by allowing prices to slip to a point where some shale projects would be uneconomic.

And some analysts took a move earlier this month by Saudi Arabia to drop its crude prices in U.S. markets as a sign it was trying to undercut shale producers.

A person familiar with the Saudi visit to New York said analysts misinterpreted Mr. Dossary’s message and that Riyadh wasn’t targeting shale producers. Attempts to reach Mr. Dossary or the Saudi oil ministry media office were unsuccessful.

Industry officials familiar with the Saudi price cut said it was aimed only at protecting market share among U.S. refiners.

>>> Fed's Powell (FOMC voter): To begin process of choosing new risk free rate -

Fed's Powell (FOMC voter): To begin process of choosing new risk free rate - CNBC 
- Meeting with banks today on Libor
- Japan in a very challenging situation
- Timing of rate hike totally dependent on data; expects to raise rates sometime in 2015 given the current trajectory, perhaps mid-2015
- See progress toward our 2% inflation target but inflation is likely to remain low for some time

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to disappointing earnings/guidance
: ATEA -19.8%, SCOK -13.7%, ROX -13.6%, VPCO -3.3%, SVA -2.9%, RNA -2.5%

M&A news: DWA -13.7% (Dreamworks Animation and Hasbro (HAS) M&A talks may be fading, according to reports), HAL -4% (Baker Hughes & Halliburton (HAL) to combine in stock and cash transaction valued at $34.6 bln or $78.62/ BHI share), VRX -1.3% says if they are not successful in removing a majority of directors in order to facilitate negotiations, they will likely retract their offer for AGN)

Select metals/mining stocks trading lower: HMY -4%, GFI -2.3%, AU -2.2%, AU -2.2%, GOLD -1.1%, SLV -1%

Select oil/gas related names showing early weakness: PTR -2%, PBR -1.4%, STO -1%, BP -0.9%, TOT -0.7%

Other news: GSAT -12.5% (stock fell in after-hours Friday as Cramer was no longer bullish on Mad Money; note that CEO disclosed stock purchases this morning), INO -11.8% (to independently develop prostate cancer immunotherapy; will maintain collaboration and license agreement with Roche (RHHBY) for Inovio's Hepatitis B Immunotherapy), DNR -6.5% (announces management changes and key elements of the company's plans for 2015 that will be presented at their annual analyst day; also downgraded to Neutral from Outperform at Credit Suisse), JRJC -2.7% (announces change in auditing firm), LNKD -2.5% (may be attributed to article in FT FT that Facebook (FB) may introduce ‘Facebook at Work' website), LOCO -2.4% (commenced a proposed public follow-on offering on behalf of certain of the company's stockholders to offer 6 mln shares of the company's common stock), AZN -2.2% (presents data from Phase III studies of Lesinurad in combination with Allopurinol in gout patients), MU -2.1% (still checking), TSEM -1.7% (still checking), PFE -1.6% (still checking), PFE -1.6% (forms global strategic alliance with Merck KGaA (MKGAY.PK) to jointly develop and commercialize anti-PD-L1 to accelerate presence in immuno-oncology), SNE -1.4% (weak mkts in Japan overnight), YELP -1.4% (still checking), TM -1.3% (weak mkts in Japan overnight), DE -1% (Berkshire Hathaway sells position in DE; prior stake was around 4 mln shares)

Analyst comments: TUBE -2.7% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup), ODP -2.2% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Goldman), NOK -2% (downgraded to Underperform from Mkt Perform at Raymond James), IMPV -1.3% (downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at JP Morgan), KMX -1.3% (downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Morgan Stanley), HTZ -1.3% (downgraded to Market Perform from Outperform at Wells Fargo), AEG -1.2% (downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA/Merrill
)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to strong earnings/guidance
: CMGE +5.1%, TSN +3.9%, JD +1.8%

M&A news: BHI +16.1% (Baker Hughes & Halliburton (HAL) to combine in stock and cash transaction valued at $34.6 bln or $78.62/ BHI share), AGN +4.2% (Allergan may be very close to $215/share deal to be acquired by Actavis (ACT), according to reports), PT +4.2% (cont M&A spec), HAS +4.1% (Dreamworks Animation and Hasbro (HAS) M&A talks may be fading, according to reports)

Other news: CADC +53.1% (still checking), ADES +20% (receives positive NASDAQ panel decision; co given until March 27th, 2015 to submit delinquent filings), CLDX +13.6% (announced an interim update from the Phase 2 ReACT study of rindopepimut), FOLD +12.5% (announces positive Phase 3 Data on cardiac and composite endpoints from Fabry Monotherapy Study), SSE +3.3% (Carl Icahn discloses updated portfolio position), OXGN +2.5% (cont momentum pre-mkt), TKMR +1.7% (announces licensing and collaboration agreement with Dicerna (DRNA)), NVAX +1.3% (initiates Phase 2 clinical trial of RSV vaccine in elderly subjects ), TRP +1.2% (Activist may soon send letter to TRP urging company to look at tax strategy, according to reports), ALU +1% (still checking), ESRX +0.8% (Berkshire Hathaway discloses new 449K share stake), PTEN +0.8% (BHI peer)

Analyst comments: MSTX +11.1% (reinstated with a Buy at Canaccord Genuity), PRTO +5.5% (initiated with a Outperform at Robert W. Baird; initiated with a Buy at Stifel), MTG +1.9% (added to Conviction Buy list at Goldman), CSTM +1.6% (upgraded to Outperform from Mkt Perform at Bernstein), THOR +1.4% (upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at Wells Fargo), VOLC +1.4% (upgraded to Outperform from Neutral at Credit Suisse), BBY +0.7% (target raised to $42 at Stifel)

>>> BHI/HAL : M&A Call

Baker Hughes: Haliburton M&A Call
Do not believe potential divestitures will diminish the overall value; believes would have a number of interested buyers in some of the units it would potentially sell off

>>> BHI / HAL Pre market HAL -4.67% BHI +15.65%

$19 +1.12 deal terms...

BHI Trading with 11.2% Discount for now pre -market ...look wide as even if the deal is not easy and could be long...will price 7/8% spread...Break fee is big so I Guess that HAL should have done its due dilignece before starting ths process...Week end press was mentioning some PE fund already in contact with HAL to buy some of BHI activities...could see drive ro more deals maybe in europe as we see PE fund starting to invest in Europe...

Keep an eye on SBMO as HAL own a 12% Stake in the company...

>>> Tyson Foods beats by $0.10, reports revs in-line; guides FY15 EPS in-line; c

Tyson Foods beats by $0.10, reports revs in-line; guides FY15 EPS in-line; co reports record Q4 sales and record 2014 sales and adj. EPS

Reports Q4 (Sep) earnings of $0.87 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.10 better than the Capital IQ Consensus Estimate of $0.77; revenues rose 13.6% year/year to $10.11 bln vs the $10.14 bln consensus.
  • Co issues in-line guidance for FY15, sees EPS of $3.30-3.40 vs. $3.33 Capital IQ Consensus Estimate.
  • "This is an exciting time as we integrate Hillshire Brands and Tyson Foods," Smith said, "and I believe that when we look back on this merger years from now, we'll see it as a watershed event. We're setting higher expectations and anticipating more growth and increased profitability, specifically in the Chicken and Prepared Foods segments."
  • "In the long-term, our Chicken segment should generate a 7-9% return on sales, although we expect fiscal 2015 to be particularly strong with a return of more than 10%."
  • "Fiscal 2015 should be another great year and is already off to a strong start... as we look ahead to 2016, we see continued success and growth."

WSJ : Halliburton to Buy Baker Hughes for $34.6 Billion

Halliburton to Buy Baker Hughes for $34.6 Billion
Cash and Stock Deal Follows Weeks of Discussions

Halliburton Co. has agreed to buy oil field company Baker Hughes Inc. in a stock-and-cash deal valued at $34.6 billion after weeks of discussions.

Halliburton’s $78.62-a-share offer has an enterprise value of $38 billion, based on Halliburton’s closing price on Nov. 12. Upon completion, Baker Hughes shareholders will own about 36% of the combined company.


The deal comes after weeks of discussions turned hostile. The Wall Street Journal reported last week that Halliburton and Baker Hughes were in talks. The deal would help the big oil-field services companies contend with falling oil prices. Halliburton made its initial proposal to Baker Hughes on Oct. 13.

Halliburton intends to finance the cash portion of the acquisition through a combination of cash on hand and fully committed debt financing. If required by regulators, Halliburton will divest businesses that generate up to $7.5 billion in revenues, and will pay a $3.5 billion termination fee if the transaction fails due to regulatory problems.

The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2015.

On a pro forma basis, the combined company had 2013 revenues of $51.8 billion, more than 136,000 employees and operations in more than 80 countries around the world.

The new company will have a combined board of 15 members, including three from the Baker Hughes board. Halliburton Chief Executive Dave Lesar will continue as CEO.

Write to Angela Chen at angela.chen@dowjones.com