>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
Gapping up: CNVR +31.2%, ASTI +16.3%, ULTA +15.9%, LXRX +8.4%, SPWH +7.6%, CVTI +7.6%, XPO +5.9%, VNET +5.3%, HTZ +4.5%, BTX +3.7%, DRI +3.5%, TASR +2.9%, BDSI +2.8%, ADS +2.4%, NVO +2.3%, BCS +2%, CRTO +1.8%, TNET +1.5%, FUEL +1.4%, SCOK +1%, MU +1%, SAN +1%, PRAN +0.9%, YHOO +0.7%

Gapping down: OXBT -8.9%, CHKE -7.9%, HCN -3.3%, SDRL -2.8%, IAG -2%, HDS -1%, RIG -1%, GOLD -0.9%, SLV -0.8%, MCP -0.6%

WSJ : Activist Investors Build Up Their War Chests

Activist Investors Build Up Their War Chests
Third Point Raises $2.5 Billion That the Hedge Fund Could Deploy by Year-End; Others Add to Their Coffers

CEOs, beware: Activist investors who target America's corporations are gathering more ammunition.

A number of the largest activists are raising billions of dollars, in an effort to take advantage of their increasing clout in boardrooms and above-average hedge-fund returns.

Daniel Loeb's Third Point LLC recently raised a $2.5 billion war chest that the hedge fund could deploy by year-end, people familiar with the matter said Thursday. Other activists, including Trian Fund Management LP, Pershing Square Capital Management LP and Jana Partners LLC, are also expanding the size of their coffers, people familiar with those firms said.

Funds under management by these activists and others grew by $9.4 billion in the first half of the year to $111 billion, gaining more in that period than in the previous two years combined, according to industry researcher HFR. Mr. Loeb and some other activists have described the current environment as the best they have seen for raising cash.

The gains come as activists, who typically buy stakes in companies and agitate for strategic or financial changes, are now a force to be reckoned with at U.S. companies. The investors, once dismissed as corporate raiders, have gained board seats or forced change at such blue-chip companies as Microsoft Corp. MSFT +0.34% and Procter & Gamble Co. PG -0.18%

The investors have also turned in returns that have outperformed their hedge-fund peers of late. Through August, activist investors returned an average 5.9% for the year, according to HFR, compared with a 3.9% gain for hedge funds in general. Still, both trailed the S&P 500's 9.9% gain. Third Point's flagship fund was up 6.4% after fees, including a 1.7% gain in August.

Investors say successful activist campaigns can create returns that are independent of broader market conditions.

Mr. Loeb raised his new funds over about two weeks this August. The amount is one of the largest sums a hedge fund has amassed so quickly, according to fund experts.

Third Point plans to use the funds to buy up stock in several large companies in the U.S. and abroad, people familiar with the plans said. It was unclear Thursday which companies Third Point has homed in on and whether the hedge fund already has stakes in them.

Third Point's recent reluctance to take money—it even gave back over $1 billion to investors late last year—likely contributed to the strong interest, but the fundraising also illustrates investors' continued appetite for exposure to activists.

Third Point will now manage a new high of $17.5 billion, cementing it as one of the largest activist investors on Wall Street, past the roughly $15 billion managed by William Ackman's Pershing Square and Jeffrey Ubben's ValueAct Capital Management LP.

Third Point told investors this week that Mr. Loeb hoped to work constructively with the management teams in his coming activist positions.

The hedge fund received investor requests totaling $3.4 billion, well over the $1.5 billion the fund had been targeting, Third Point told investors. The money came from more than 150 investors, nearly all of them existing clients, one of the people said.

"Managers who can do that are few and far between," said Bob Leonard, Credit Suisse Group AG CSGN.VX -0.63% 's head of capital services, which introduces hedge funds to potential investors. "It takes pedigree and track record to be able to flip the switch and get that kind of capital."

Pershing Square's Mr. Ackman is counting on the current demand to help fuel his attempt at a $3 billion initial public offering for a fund in Europe this year to provide more permanent capital.

Pershing Square recently hired Deutsche Bank AG DBK.XE -0.64% and UBS AG UBS -0.34% for the process, according to people familiar with the plans. Pershing Square's flagship fund rose 25% in the first half of the year, according to a letter to investors.

"The popularity of activism as a strategy has increased due to the potential it offers for substantial returns," Mr. Ackman wrote in a letter to investors last month.

Similar arguments are being made by other large activists taking in more money.

Trian, led by Nelson Peltz, Peter May and Ed Garden, raised about $1 billion in the first half and is on pace for another $1 billion by the end of the year, according to one person familiar with the fund. Trian's total assets currently stand at about $10 billion, most of which is currently in the firm's funds that lock in investors for longer periods of time, the person said.

Jana's total has risen to $11 billion, according to a person familiar with the matter, though only a portion of its investing is considered activism.

Elliott Management Corp. received commitments for $3.3 billion from investors in the span of about three months last year. Elliott currently manages about $25 billion, with activism part of the total.

(BFW) Ryanair Valuation Premium to Airline Peers Rises, Tops EasyJet


Ryanair Valuation Premium to Airline Peers Rises, Tops EasyJet
2014-09-12 06:44:58.825 GMT


By Brian Lysaght
Sept. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Ryanair has extended its valuation
premium vs peers, highlighting the stock has recovered from a
profit warning last year that sent the airline’s shares
tumbling.
* Compared to its 5 main European rivals, Ryanair’s blended
12-month forward P/E of 14.7x is at a 39% premium to peers,
above its 20% avg. premium over the past year, according to
Bloomberg data
* EasyJet trades on 11.1x 12-month forward earnings, in line
with the past year, with Irish rival Aer Lingus on 12.2x,
Air France on 9.9x, IAG at 9x, Lufthansa 6.7x
* Ryanair has gained ~41% since a Nov. 4 profit-forecast cut
when the stock fell 12.6%; SXXP travel index up ~14% since
then
* On July 28, Ryanair raised its earnings forecast for the
current year; consensus earnings ests. call for a 28% y/y
rise in net income for current FY and 13% next year vs
EasyJet’s 13%/11% expected net income rise (NOTE: cos. have
different financial year-ends)
* Ryanair passenger traffic “growing strongly,” and recent
service enhancements are positive for yields, Cantor
Fitzgerald (buy) said in a Sept. 10 note
* Says airline’s cash flow leaves room for another special
div., even after its $22b Boeing planes order
* Ryanair has the highest consensus rating among SXXP
airlines; 76% of the 25 analyst ratings recommend investors
buy, highest percentage in the travel index
* Ryanair’s avg. PT of EU8.15 implies ~8% upside, lags
EasyJet’s ~23% upside to avg. PT

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Brian Lysaght in London at +44-20-7330-7908 or
blysaght@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
James Ludden at +44-20-7673-2645 or
jludden@bloomberg.net
Tim Barwell, Cormac Mullen

(BFW) Afren Multiples Unsustainably Cheap If No New Issues Arise: UBS


Afren Multiples Unsustainably Cheap If No New Issues Arise: UBS
2014-09-12 06:29:31.919 GMT


By James Cone
Sept. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Afren down 36% since CEO, COO were
suspended over alleged receipt of unauthorized payments, appears
mkt pricing in major drop in future cash flows even though co.
sees no negative effect on operational, financial position, UBS
says in note.
* UBS (buy): drop almost equivalent to Afren losing license to
operate in Nigeria, such revocation typically only when work
commitments unsatisfied
* Says Afren is not operator of any of its Nigeria
licenses, no indication partners haven’t met contractual
obligations, can find no examples of revocation linked
to payments to 3rd parties
* OML 113 license due for renewal Feb. 2018; no reason to
believe extension won’t be granted
* Without any new issues, valuation of 2.8x 2015 EV/debt-
adjusted cash flow, 0.37x NAV “unsustainably cheap”
* Co. can rebuild mgmt to restore confidence or assess if
underlying assets might be worth more with other
industry players
* NOTE Aug. 28: Afren Falls After Suspending Two More
Directors in Probe
* Afren is biggest decliner in SXEP oil & gas index YTD, down
44%


For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
James Cone in London at +44-20-7673-2572 or
jcone@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
James Ludden at +44-20-7673-2645 or
jludden@bloomberg.net

FT :Superyacht spats sail into rougher legal waters

Superyachts moored in glitzy locations such as Monaco or Portofino have long been the playthings of oligarchs or tech billionaires, but until the 2008 financial crisis, their owners preferred to settle disputes over the vessels in private.
However, in the past few months a number of unprecedented legal battles over superyachts have been fought in public, giving a rare glimpse of an industry previously renowned for its gentlemanly discretion.

There are estimated to be no more than 6,000 40-metre-plus yachts in the world.
Famous names include Eclipse, owned by Russian oligarch and Chelsea football club owner Roman Abramovich, and the £120m Octopus, which belongs to Paul Allen, the billionaire co-founder of Microsoft.
This year, a host of high-profile superyacht cases have been fought in the High Court in London involving individuals such as the New York telecommunications entrepreneur Micharel Hirtenstein, financier Nat Rothschild and Russian property developer Kirill Pisarev.
John Leonida, partner of the law firm Clyde & Co, said parties were now more willing to fight court battles. “Before 2008, the causes of action were always there, but people didn’t litigate – it was sorted out by a phone call or behind closed doors,” he said.
He said that after the financial crisis there was a shift in attitude.
The High Court heard a dispute between Mr Hirtenstein and the law firm Hill Dickinson over a 47m luxury yacht called Il Sole.
Mr Hirtenstein, who had purchased the yacht in 2010, had brought a claim against the firm after Il Sole’s starboard engine suffered a failure 12 miles at sea. He sued Hill Dickinson for professional negligence in handling the purchase of the yacht, alleging the law firm failed to obtain a personal guarantee under which a claim could be made for loss.
A warranty of the yacht’s condition had been given by the seller Candyscape. Mr Hirtenstein had thought this was backed by a personal guarantee from property tycoon Christian Candy, the beneficial owner of the selling company and developer of London’s One Hyde Park building.
Mr Hirtenstein believed this as he had been told so by his lawyer at Hill Dickinson. But no such personal guarantee existed. In July the judge ruled in favour of Mr Hirtenstein against the law firm but said he had suffered no loss and was awarded nominal damages.


Other legal cases have involved disputes between the super-rich and their yacht brokers or over finance. The Court of Appeal in February ruled on a complex dispute involving the construction of a 71.5-metre luxury yacht called Project Nato commissioned by Swallowfalls, an Isle of Man company linked to Nat Rothschild.
Other cases have involved oligarchs from former Soviet Union. The late Boris Berezovsky lost a legal action in 2010 against yacht broker Edmiston over the sale of a 110-metre $148.5m yacht called Darius he had ordered to be built in a Bremen shipyard, and was ordered to pay €7.2m in commission.
In another case in April this year, Florida yacht brokers Moran Yacht and Ship Inc sued Mr Pisarev in London’s High Court over an alleged claim for commission over sale of the 47-metre yacht 4You. They claimed they showed the boat to wealthy Russian Alexander Miliavsky and one of his companies bought it 21 months later for €19.8m. They claimed they were entitled to commission but their claim was dismissed by the court.
Lawyers say the number of cases reaching the courts is the tip of the iceberg as most disputes involving the construction of super yachts have arbitration clauses and so are usually heard behind closed doors.
Before the financial crisis, new money made in the hedge fund industry or in technology poured into superyachts and rising prices of yachts meant that would-be owners were just keen to secure a boat.
“It is an industry in which large yachts often change hands quietly without the press even knowing,” said Richard Coles, partner at law firm Gateley and co-editor of Law of Yachts and Yachting. “So if there is a dispute, the last things people want is for their affairs to be aired in public so court is not usually the first option. But the amounts of money involved are large and times are not easy,” he added.
Quentin Bargate, partner at the law firm Bargate Murray, said some increase in litigation may have been because yacht brokers were finding life tougher after the financial crisis.
“There is a tendency to fight over every penny,” he said. “Money is tighter and the tax regulators have increased their interest in superyachts and are being more aggressive. Disputes that would have been dealt with by gentlemen’s agreements or by a handshake are now more likely to end up in the hands of lawyers like me.