(UBS) TomTom Catch a bolting horse or chasing cars?

* HERE sale drives scarcity value
The prospect of a possible sale of Nokia's mapping asset (HERE) - widely speculated
now at $4bn (Bloomberg 19/5/15) or 2.9x '16E revenue clearly underscores the
strategic value in mapping assets including TomTom. In this note we assess what the
scenarios are for the industry and what the differences are between TomTom and HERE
to derive a value of TomTom. We recognised at the end of 2014 that M&A would be a
driver in mapping in 2015, and this formed part of the reason for us upgrading at the
time from Sell to Neutral. Our analysis now suggests on a sum of the parts basis a
TomTom value of €10.2/share and we remain Neutral.

* Positives in the fundamentals
We see a number of positives in TomTom in addition to the value perceived in mapping
including: 1) Strong automotive bookings driving revenue beyond 2015; 2) According
to our analysis, every 2% increase of content & services as % of sales has a positive
impact of 119bps on gross margin and we expect product mix to improve going
forward; and 3) If Nokia HERE is being acquired by a car manufacturer consortium,
TomTom will become the last independent map data provider.

* Forecast changes
We increase our automotive revenue forecast by 20%/44%, respectively, in '16E/'17E
on the back of strong order bookings, increasing our gross profit by 5%/11% in
'16E/'17E.

* Valuation: DCF-based price target from €7.00 to €10.30 (WACC 9%, g2%)
As is generally the case, management teams of acquiring companies tend to have a
more optimistic view of the strategic longer-term value than our fundamental view of
the value of the cash flow inherent in companies (evidenced in both CSR/Transmode
acquisitions) – arguably reflective of the low cost of financing currently. We believe
TomTom – driven up by M&A in the sector - is the same, and there is an increasing
disconnect between our fair value and others' view of its strategic value. This makes
valuing the entity difficult (the stock is implying c.11% EBIT margins vs 7% '15E). In this
note we revisit this, but we remain Neutral.