We conclude that:
a.
To the extent that we have ruled that the European Union's claims under Articles 3.1(a),
3.1(b) and Article 3.2 of the SCM Agreement
are within the scope of this proceeding,
these claims are unfounded because: (i) certain measures challenged by the
European Union are not subsidies provided to
Boeing after the end of the implementation
period; and (ii) where we find that the measures at issue are subsidies provided to
Boeing after the end of the implementation
period, the European Union has failed to
establish that any of these subsidies is contingent in fact upon export performance or
upon the use of domestic over imported goods.
b.
To the extent that we have ruled that the European Union's claims under Article III:4 of
the GATT 1994 are within the scope of this proceeding, the European Union has failed to
establish that any of the measures at issue is inconsistent with Article III:4 of the
GATT 1994.