Farfetch: What Went Wrong?
The London-based luxury e-commerce giant, which has lost 97 percent of its market value in the last two years, has suffered from lack of focus, writes Imran Amed.
LONDON — Back in June 2007, the same year I started writing BoF, I met an enthusiastic and passionate Portuguese entrepreneur named José Neves. We had been introduced to each other by mutual friends and began exchanging ideas on how the fashion industry could transform itself into a modern, digitally savvy sector by embracing the new technologies that were changing the way we all lived, worked and, yes, shopped. I was really impressed with José's vision. He seemed to be able to see things that most industry players would not: that the same technologies that were transforming other consumer sectors would inevitably come for fashion too.
A couple of years later, as José's vision for his new company Farfetch continued to crystallise, I sat down with him for an in-depth interview where he laid out his plan to “create a world class infrastructure supported by a top-notch team, and then put all that to the service of the world’s most interesting retailers and their web sites.”
It was a simple, powerful idea that instantly made sense to me. Some of the best fashion boutiques around the world, despite having a powerful eye for curation, were not able to fund, set up and manage their own e-commerce operations to scale their businesses beyond their local markets — and Farfetch could help with that.
This, combined with the fact that Farfetch did not take on the risk of owning inventory made it a compelling business model that attracted the interest of venture capitalists who over the years pushed Farfetch to expand and grow to realise the vision of becoming the Amazon of the fashion industry, a platform upon which the whole industry could operate its e-commerce businesses. According to Crunchbase, Farfetch went on to raise more than $1.6 billion, including an IPO in 2015 which raised $885 million.
But this week, as we waited for a ruling from the European Commission on the company’s plan to acquire a 47.5 percent stake in its rival, Yoox Net-a-Porter Group, many analysts noted that Farfetch shares have lost 97 percent of their value in the last two years, a spectacular drop. Its market capitalisation has plummeted from a pandemic high of $26 billion in February 2021 to just over $600 million today.
In August, Farfetch announced that its revenue dropped 1 percent in the second quarter of 2023 from a year earlier to $572 million and downgraded its sales outlook for the full year by $500 million, to $4.4 billion.
I’ve been thinking about how things went so wrong at Farfetch, and my thoughts kept coming back to this: the fashion industry and the financial markets no longer understand the company’s increasingly complex vision and have little faith that the company, which has never consistently made a profit, can get back on track.
In 2015, the company began a spree of acquisitions, starting with Browns (meaning that Farfetch would now be taking on inventory and operating physical stores), the intellectual property from Condé Nast’s failed e-commerce venture Style.com (a brand that the company has never used), sneaker reseller Stadium Goods in 2018 (which moved Farfetch into the resale business and further into physical retail), New Guards Group in August 2019 (meaning that Farfetch now operated brands like Off-White and Palm Angels, including design, manufacturing and even more physical retail), and in 2022, Violet Grey. (The company was Farfetch’s first move into beauty and, according to a source who spoke to The Business of Beauty, is now up for sale).
In addition to these acquisitions, Farfetch now also operates white-label platform solutions for a variety of brands and retailers, including Neiman Marcus (into which it invested $200 million as part of an unusual deal), a business in China in partnership with Richemont and Alibaba and its original business which now works more than 1400 sellers in 50 countries.
The cautionary tale here for any entrepreneur taking on huge amounts of funding is the importance of maintaining focus. Over the years, as Farfetch went on its acquisition spree, it drifted further and further away from its original vision of being a technology platform for the fashion industry. As tempting as it may be to raise more money and acquire scale (and, sometimes profitability, as was the case with New Guards Group) through acquisitions, when you start stitching together so many disparate pieces you end up with a patchwork quilt that nobody understands.