(Recode.net) AOL Has Been in Talks to Spin Off HuffPost as Part of Verizon Acqui


AOL Has Been in Talks to Spin Off HuffPost as Part of Verizon Acquisition Deal

ccording to numerous sources, while it has been negotiating its deal to sell to Verizon, AOL has also been in advanced discussions with a number of parties to spin off its flagship Huffington Post content unit.

The talks have been most serious with Axel Springer, the German media conglomerate, but a number of private equity firms have also expressed interest in the high-profile property. Sources said the Huffington Post has been valued at above $1 billion in this scenario that would either be a complete sale or, more likely, structured as a joint venture.

The move would be designed to bring more investment for growth for the Huffington Post, which AOL bought several years ago for $300 million. High content costs and the ability to monetize those assets — AOL also owns TechCrunch and a number of other content properties — has been hard for the company.

AOL’s earnings report from Q1 spells out the difference quite clearly: Its “Brand” group — which includes HuffPo and TechCrunch — grew its revenue by eight percent over the past year and posted operating income of $13 million. Meanwhile, its “Platforms” group — which specializes in automated ad sales on other publishers’ properties — grew by 21 percent but lost $10 million.

Of course, Verizon could pony up more dough for the site’s leader, Arianna Huffington, part of a alleged strategy to own more content. But sources said a spin-off was far more likely. Source said AOL’s other content properties have not been part of these talks, although there may be others interested in them.

Arianna Huffington, who now works for the phone company, is likely to support any deal in which she and her unit gets more money to grow globally. It has been aggressively expanding since it was bought by AOL, opening new sites across the world. It is set to launch four more soon, including in China.

In an interview with Re/code this morning, Armstrong didn’t address that scenario directly, although he seemed to leave the door open. “We’ve spoken to partners about content and scaling,” he said. “Obviously, we’ve seen a lot of interest in the content brands we have. So over the course of the summer, stay tuned.”

I’d take that as a yes, as Armstrong has a tendency to be cagey to the point of obfuscation. He has long denied any talks with Verizon, including when rumors of an acquisition deal surfaced earlier this year. And when I asked him directly last week after hearing those acquisition discussions were again taking place, he also denied explicitly that they were serious.

I guess not. Thus, today, Arianna Huffington and Tim Armstrong work for the phone company.

No comments all around, as you might imagine.

(Oscar Gruss - Makor) Pall Corp First /thoughts

Pall Corp (PLL) - Thermo Fischer Scientific (TMO) purchased Life Technologies (LIFE) in January 2013. Deal price was $76.00/share ($13.1B MC, $15.2B EV, 38% takeover price premium) and TTM multiples (including $275M synergies or 7.2% of $3.84B revs) were 11.0x EV/EBITDA ($1.38B) and 17.1x P/E ($4.56 EPS). The unaffected LIFE TTM valuations multiples (@ $55/share) were 10.5x EV/EBITDA ($1.11B, 29% margin) and 17.1x P/E ($3.21 EPS); existing debt leverage was 2.2x.

The PLL takeover price is reported to be $120/share ($12.8B MC, $13.9B EV); Danaher (DHR) is reported as the most likely acquirer with an all-cash price. Assuming 5%-7% synergies of 2016E $2.94B Revs ($145M-$205M range) at a 20% tax rate, a $120/share deal price (22% premium to prior 20 day $98.40 average closing price) implies takeover valuation multiples of 15.9x-14.9x EV/EBITDA ($874M-933M) and 22.5x-20.8x P/E ($5.34-$5.78 EPS). The unaffected PLL 2016E valuation multiples are 15.9x EV/EBITDA ($727M) and 23.3x P/E ($4.23 EPS); current debt leverage is 2.9x.

Life sciences companies are currently hot commodities which is reflected in the greatly increased standalone and deal valuation multiples between the LIFE/TMO deal and the potential PLL acquisition.

DHR is reported to be the leading contender as it can pay an all-cash deal consideration; TMO would likely have synergies with its LIFE acquisition but would need to have equity funding (either as part of the deal terms or issuing new stock) as it has almost $16B debt (~4x 2015E $4.17B EBITDA). DHR has a slightly larger MC than TMO ($59B vs. $51B) but only $3.4B debt; DHR with 2015E $4.77B EBITDA clearly has the capacity to lever its balance sheet to outbid TMO and a proven cost cutting culture, both which should contribute to an acquisition of PLL being highly cash EPS accretive (as reported earlier today).

>>> Actavis focusing on bolt-ons; wary of large hostile takeovers

Deal Reporter

Actavis focusing on bolt-ons; wary of large hostile takeovers
Actavis (NYSE:ACT), the Ireland-based pharmaceutical company, will concentrate its M&A search on bolt-ons and is reluctant to pursue hostile takeovers, according to executives.

On the 1Q15 earnings call held Monday (11 May), Deutsche Bank analyst Gregg Gilbert asked CEO Brenton Saunders to comment on the near-term desire to pursue a large acquisition.

“Our commitment to maintain our investment-grade rating is of critical importance to us,” the CEO replied. “We will continue to look at bolt-on deals as a matter of course.”

He added that with its current cash constraints, a transformational deal would have to be “truly compelling” for Actavis to use equity.

Later in the session, Piper Jaffray analyst David Amsellem asked about the company’s priorities in terms of US or ex-US bolt-ons for its Generics business.

President, Generics and Global Operations Robert Stewart said while Actavis opportunistically looked at M&A in the US, it already had scale in the country and did not believe further buys would provide it with anything meaningful. He noted that the only area of interest could be a portfolio of injectable products.

“Outside the US, we’re always looking at different geographies that we’re already strong (in),” Stewart continued, noting the purchase of UK-based Auden Mckenzie as an example. “We may look in certain markets where there might be some tuck-in type acquisitions to just increase our overall strength there, more portfolio based, more small company type of transactions.”

He added that the company did not require a large acquisition within the Generics business to remain competitive.

Earlier on the call, Cowen analyst Ken Cacciatore asked if Actavis would consider being less passive in approaching a larger player for a takeover opportunity.

“Doing a hostile deal against a large-going concern, like we’ve seen in the industry over the last 12 months, is value-destroying,” CEO Saunders said.

Saunders noted that Actavis was experienced at integrating buys, with its respectful treatment of a target’s people key to its success. He added that there were opportunities for hostile deals when buying a single product or research program for which staff were not key to the operation.

“But in most of these businesses, people are such a large part of the equation, I think, going hostile in virtually every instance is a mistake. There could always be an exception to that,” Saunders said.

Generics interest

Separately, Goldman Sachs analyst Jami Rubin noted that there were companies that could be willing to pay a very high multiple for Actavis’ Generics business and asked if there was a way to sell the unit in a tax-efficient manner.

Saunders said the space was “in a bit of turmoil,” with two hostile situations in progress. He noted that while selling the Generics business in a tax efficient way would be very difficult, the fact that Actavis considered the unit to have strategic value was of greater importance.

Asked by JPMorgan analyst Christopher Schott whether the company would consider separating its Brand and Generics franchises if its share price remained at current valuations, the CEO said Actavis’ lower than normal stock levels would not cause it to consider selling the Generics business.

He added that the company had only recently closed its purchase of Allergan and needed to integrate the deal and demonstrate to shareholders the value of the combined business.

Recent efforts

In his prepared remarks, Saunders said Actavis had completed one of the largest deals in the healthcare industry over the past 10 years during the first quarter, its USD 66bn purchase of Allergan. Actavis expanded its international portfolio with the acquisition of Auden Mckenzie and sharpened its brand therapy focus with the disposals of its respiratory business and Aptalis Pharmatech, he said. The CEO added that Actavis had also previously sold its generic products in Australia.

The company announced in November last year its agreement to buy California-based health care company Allergan for USD 219 per share in cash and stock. In February 2015, Actavis announced a USD 8.4bn offering to finance the cash portion of the deal.

When combined with Allergan, Actavis’ brand portfolio includes six franchises in therapeutic categories, including: Dermatology and Aesthetics; CNS; Eye Care; Women’s Health & Urology; GI and Cystic Fibrosis; and Cardiovascular and Infectious Disease. The company’s Generics portfolio includes more than 1000 generics, branded generics, established brands and OTC products.

Actavis used JPMorgan for the Allergan deal, along with Arthur Cox, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Covington & Burling, Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg, Weil Gotshal & Manges and Loyens & Loeff.

For previous sizeable acquisitions, including the purchases of Forest Laboratories in 2014 and Warner Chilcott in 2013, advisors have included BofAML and Greenhill on the financial side, as well as Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Loyens & Loeff and Latham & Watkins for legal. The latter was also retained for the Auden Mckenzie deal and several earlier buys.

Actavis has global headquarters in Dublin, Ireland and US administrative headquarters in Parsippany, New Jersey.

On the call, Actavis reported total debt of USD 44bn at the end of the quarter, with a leverage ratio of 4.1x debt-to-pro-forma adjusted EBITDA. The company has a market capitalization of USD 118.4bn.

(GS) The New Oil Order - A self-defeating rally

Market rebalancing derailed by price rally…
The oil market rebalancing has started: weak prices in 1Q15 pushed producers to cut capex while supporting demand. This led to a recovery in prices further fueled by relief that US crude stocks would not breach capacity, strong demand and rising Middle East tensions. The rise in prices was further supported by oil screening as cheap relative to E&P equities, drawing cross-asset investors into buying crude. But while the rally in oil prices has closed the valuation gap to equities, these trade on historically high multiples and oil itself is now trading at a premium to its own still weak fundamentals in our view. We therefore view this rally as derailing this rebalancing and setting the stage for sequentially weaker prices, especially with oil speculative length as long as when oil traded at $100/bbl.

… given still weak current and forward fundamentals
First, while US crude builds turn to draws, it is total petroleum stocks that matter, as rising product stocks will depress refining margins and weigh on crude prices. Second, our updated supply and demand balance points to an only gradual decline in elevated inventories in 2016 as production growth from low-cost producers such as Saudi, Iraq and Russia help offset strong demand growth and declining non-OPEC ex. US production. Further, we don’t see the US rig curtailment as large enough yet to put production on a persistent downward trend with risk to our flat Iranian production path skewed to the upside. Third, we believe that WTI oil prices settling above $60/bbl will eventually lead US producers to ramp up activity, draw down a large well backlog and hedge, given improved returns with costs down by c.20%. Fourth, the broader imbalance of too much capital looking for opportunities in the energy space remains intact.

Sequential price decline still required
As a result, while low prices precipitated the market rebalancing, we view the recent rally as premature with crude oil prices expensive relative to current and forecast fundamentals. Ultimately, with evidence at hand that US producers responded aggressively to low prices, the burden of proof has shifted to how they will respond to the recent recovery and whether low-cost producers can sustainably deliver higher production. This may as a result delay the sequential decline in prices until this fall, especially as we approach a period of seasonally stronger summer demand.

>>> Ahold and Delhaize merger proposal could hit some setbacks; unions want more

Ahold and Delhaize merger proposal could hit some setbacks; unions want more clarity regarding merger talk
There could be some obstacles in merger discussions between listed Dutch and Belgian food retailers Ahold and Delhaize, Belgian daily L’Echo reported. The report cited four setbacks that could prevent the operation from being successful.

First are the unions, which are threatening to go on strike if Delhaize does not reveal more details about the merger discussions. The report noted that the Belgian retailer announced 1,800 job cuts in a restructuring last year.
Second is the low success rate of mergers in the food retail sector, as pointed out by analysts at Bernstein.
Third is the implementation of the merger and practical issues, such as the location of the future headquarters. Pierre-Alexandre Billiet, CEO of retail trade magazine Gondola, was cited as saying the issue is very complex. If the combined entity wants to retain its European character, then Brussels would be the logical choice, he stated. The report however said that the tax rate amounts to 25% in the Netherlands compared to 33.99% in Belgium, although Delhaize's effective rate was 17.5% in 2014. The group could also decide to move its headquarters to the US, given the importance of their business in that country. Regarding management, the report said many people see Ahold current boss Dirk Boer heading the merged entity, while Frans Muller could leave and Mats Jansson, chairman of the board of Delhaize, could become the new chairman of the enlarged group.
Fourth and finally, agreeing on a price is a tricky matter. While the two parties have a similar valuation, the report cited analysts at Pertercam as calculating that Ahold generates more free cash flow, while Delhaize's EBITDA ratio is better. An analyst at Degroof added that mergers in the food retail sector are not as expensive as other sectors because the profitability of the players is low. Gino Van Ossel, a professor and expert in the retail food sector, claimed that the transaction could result in a merger of equals or in Ahold becoming the acquirer, given that the company has the financial means to do it.
Speaking about the advantages of the merger, the report cited the savings, the timing, the geography, and the shareholders as elements that plead in favour of a tie-up: The synergies could amount to anywhere from EUR 500m to over EUR 1bn, estimated by analysts at Petercam, ABN Amro and Rabobank;

In terms of timing, both groups are financially healthy, with Delhaize having restructured its operations in Europe and in the US, and Ahold having a coffer full of cash, according to retail professor Claude Boffa.

The two groups are very similar in terms of geographic presence, especially on the US East Coast and in the Benelux, while having very few duplicate operations. Billiet said that attaining a larger size is a critical strategy in the food retail sector, where profit margins are low.

Finally, the report noted that no shareholders are expected to block or hinder the discussions between the parties. Ahold shareholders are institutional investors, while the control of investor families in Delhaize is believed to amount to fewer than 20% of the share capital, analyst Hans D’Haese claimed. Delhaize will also welcome two new independent board members in the coming days in replacement of two families’ representatives, the report noted.

The socialist union BBTK wants Delhaize to be more open about the progress the group is making regarding a potential merger with Ahold, Belgian daily De Standaard reported, citing a letter from BBTK.

In the letter the union threatened to go on strike if Delhaize, which employs 1,800 people, remains unclear about its intentions to merge with Ahold. The union fears job cuts and lower wages.


Link to original article (L'Echo) {http://www.lecho.be/detail.art?a=9632621&n=3005&ckc=1}
Link to original article (De Standaard) {http://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20150511_01675003}
L'Echo, De Standaard

(BFW) Sika Founders Say No Agreement w/ Sika After Meeting Magistrate


Sika Founders Say No Agreement w/ Sika After Meeting Magistrate
2015-05-12 13:25:59.61 GMT


By Jan-Henrik Förster
(Bloomberg) -- Sika AG and founding Burkard family didn’t
reach agreement before magistrate of Baar, Schenker-Winkler
Holding, the investment vehicle of the family, says in e-mailed
statement.
* Negotiations about restriction of voting rights didn’t bring
agreement
* Schenker-Winkler will file complaint to Cantonal Court of
Zug in coming days to appeal against all decisions made at
AGM
* Sika couldn’t be immediately reached for comment
* NOTE: Sika Offers to Buy Burkard Family Shares,
SonntagsZeitung Says
* NOTE: Sika Drops in Legal Hangover From Investor Battle Over
Takeover


For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Jan-Henrik Förster in Zurich at +41-44-224-4116 or
jforster20@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Mariajose Vera at +49-89-244478-803 or
mvera1@bloomberg.net
Dylan Griffiths

(JPM) Raised Syngenta to Neutral from Underweight - price target raised to SF370

JPMorgan Chase and Co Raised Syngenta to Neutral from Underweight - price target raised to SF370 from SF240
- Firm believes management is likely to consider methods to improve equity return profile of Syngenta as a standalone business for its shareholders
- Firm notes that the main options open to syngenta appears as; a sale/de-emphasis of the American corn and soybean seeds businesses, a re-allocation of capital into shareholder returns or an acquisition in Syngenta’s ‘core’ business areas in due course, and an acceleration of cost cutting
- Firm factors in a 50% probability that the company will be acquired at SF500 in firm's DCF model