(BFW) China Cuts 1-Year Lending Rate by 0.25 Percentage Point



BN 05/10 09:07 China Cuts 1-Year Interest Rates by 0.25 Percentage Point
BFW 05/10 09:06 *CHINA CUTS 1-YEAR INTEREST RATES BY 0.25 PERCENTAGE POINT
BFW 05/10 09:05 *CHINA CUTS 1-YEAR LENDING RATE BY 0.25 PERCENTAGE POINT
BFW 05/10 09:05 *CHINA CUTS 1-YEAR DEPOSIT RATE BY 0.25 PERCENTAGE POINT
BN 05/10 09:04 *CHINA CUTS INTEREST RATES

China Cuts 1-Year Lending Rate by 0.25 Percentage Point
2015-05-10 09:21:47.40 GMT


By Bloomberg News
(Bloomberg) -- PBOC cuts 1-yr lending rate by 0.25
percentage point to 5.1%, according to statement on central
bank’s website.
* PBOC also cuts 1-yr deposit rate by 0.25 percentage point to
2.25%, it says
* PBOC raises deposit-rate ceiling to 150% of benchmark from
130% of benchmark: statement
* Rate cut, deposit ceiling change effective May 11: statement


Link to Company News:{PBCZ CH <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>}
First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story:
Penny Peng in Beijing at +86-10-6649-7719 or
ppeng18@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Andrew Monahan at +852-2977-6483 or
amonahan@bloomberg.net

NYT : Uber Fund-Raising Points to $50 Billion Valuation

Uber Fund-Raising Points to $50 Billion Valuation

SAN FRANCISCO — Uber is fund-raising again.

The mobile car-hailing application is in early talks to raise a new round of financing that could value the start-up at $50 billion, according to a person familiar with the discussions, who spoke anonymously because the process is confidential. Uber could raise around $1.5 billion, given the amount of interest from investors in the company, the person said.

The new capital will not be used primarily for expansion purposes, unlike Uber’s previous financing rounds. Instead, the funding is strategic, with an eye on partnerships, the person said.

Uber declined to comment. The fund-raising was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.

An engineer from the service Here drives a mapping vehicle in Britain. A consortium of automakers is seeking to buy Here, and Uber is said to be bidding.Uber Joins the Bidding for Here, Nokia’s Digital Mapping ServiceMAY 7, 2015
Uber, based in San Francisco, has raised money relentlessly in recent years at rapidly swelling valuations. So far, the company has raised more than $4 billion as it moves into new markets globally, disrupting established taxi and other transportation industries by letting people request rides through their smartphones. The company was founded in 2009 and is led by Travis Kalanick, who is chief executive.

In December, Uber closed a $1.2 billion round of financing that valued it at $40 billion. The company then moved to accommodate additional investors like Baidu, the Chinese Internet giant.

That round followed one in June, when the service said that it had raised $1.2 billion at a valuation of $17 billion.

At a $50 billion valuation, Uber would be the world’s most valuable private start-up, topping the Chinese electronics maker Xiaomi, which was last valued at $45 billion. It would also be worth more than publicly traded companies like FedEx, with a market value of $48 billion, and Nissan Motor, with a capitalization of $47 billion.

The divide between Uber and other “unicorns” — Silicon Valley’s term for billion-dollar start-ups — would also grow. Even at its current $40 billion valuation, it was nearly triple that of other elite Silicon Valley start-ups like the data analysis firm Palantir, according to the research firm CB Insights. Among Silicon Valley start-ups, only Facebook had attained a $50 billion valuation as a private company.

Uber’s new fund-raising discussions come as many Silicon Valley start-ups have been on a fund-raising tear. This week alone, the lending start-up Affirm said it has raised $275 million in debt and equity at an undisclosed valuation, while Zenefits, a software-as-a-service start-up, said it had raised $500 million at a valuation of $4 billion. The fund-raising has also taken place against a more compressed time period, with Zenefits boosting its war chest in less than a year from a previous financing round.

The action is not only taking place in the United States. This week, drone maker DJI, which is based in Shenzhen, China, said it raised $75 million from venture capital firm Accel Partners.

(Reuters) Exclusive: Mylan chairman tells investors he would consider buying Tev

Exclusive: Mylan chairman tells investors he would consider buying Teva

Generics drugmaker Mylan NV (MYL.O), which is in the middle of a three-way takeover battle, has said it is unwilling to sell itself to Israeli rival Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd (TEVA.TA), but would consider buying that company down the road, Mylan Executive Chairman Robert Coury told investors this week.

The company has been steadfast in its refusal to combine with Teva and is instead encouraging shareholders to support its own $34 billion unsolicited offer for over-the-counter drugmaker Perrigo Co Plc (PRGO.N).

Teva made an unsolicited $40 billion bid for Mylan last month, and it was rejected. Teva said on Tuesday it will move ahead with its plans to acquire Mylan if the Perrigo deal is not completed.

Mylan's Coury said in a statement in April the company has studied a possible combination with Teva for some time. Mylan concluded a deal would be "without sound industrial logic or cultural fit" and would attract antitrust scrutiny.

Mylan said in April it would not engage with Teva until the company was willing to offer more than $100 per share.

Speaking privately to investors this week, however, Coury was more willing to consider a deal with Teva after the Perrigo transaction is completed, as long as Mylan is the buyer, sources told Reuters.

Mylan Chief Executive Officer Heather Bresch explained to Reuters in an interview the logic behind Coury's comments. Mylan has a better management team and integrated global supply chain, as well as a superior track record with acquisitions. That would make it more capable than Teva to lead the potential combined company, she said.

A deal could make sense following a Mylan-Perrigo combination and more time for Teva's management to "clean up" the company.

"We were just saying in a hypothetical situation, if it ever were to happen after all these other things, the only way it could happen is with us," Bresch said. She added antitrust concerns would still exist.

The investor sources declined to be named because they are not authorized to speak with the media.

A Teva spokesman said the company remains deeply committed to a deal with Mylan and that there is strong strategic and cultural fit in combining the two companies.

Mylan management is meeting privately with top investors this week in New York and Boston to drum up support for its bid for Perrigo. Perrigo last week rejected Mylan's latest offer worth $75 and 2.3 Mylan shares per Perigo share, up from a previous $60 in cash and 2.2 shares.

Mylan, which makes the EpiPen product for severe allergies, is incorporated in the Netherlands and can take advantage of Dutch provisions that would make a hostile takeover difficult.

Pressure has been growing on Jerusalem-based Teva for new revenue sources. Its biggest selling drug, multiple sclerosis injectable treatment Copaxone, faces competition from oral treatments and cheaper generics in the coming years.

>>> PartnerRe suitor Exor has strong rationale to raise bid, bankers say - Anal

Deal Reporter

PartnerRe suitor Exor has strong rationale to raise bid, bankers say - Analysis

Exor (BIT:EXO) is seen as having a strong rationale to raise its bid for PartnerRe (NYSE:PRE) even as it remains unclear whether its previously tabled offer is superior, said industry bankers and a shareholder.

Earlier today, Reuters reported that at Exor’s board, at its meeting on Tuesday, will consider bumping its USD 6.4bn bid for PartnerRe in response to Axis Capital Holdings’ (NYSE:AXS) own sweetener. Exor interrupted Axis’ proposed nil-premium merger of equals last month, prompting Axis to add a USD 11.50-per-share dividend to its offer.

Exor’s current proposal values PartnerRe at USD 130 per share and is all-cash. Axis’ improved offer implies a valuation of USD 125 per share, and argues that synergies bridge the gap in value.

Governance groups whose recommendations are influential amongst shareholders have yet to weigh in, creating an opportunity for Exor to sway investors now with a minor bump, the first banker said.

Investors might also require a bump from Exor to be comfortable with the rival offer given PartnerRe management’s recommendation to go forward with the Axis deal, said a minor PartnerRe shareholder.

Still, the shareholder said Exor's current cash offer is already stronger than the Axis sweetener. The cash offer likely exceeds the value of future synergies between the fundamentally different entities Axis and PartnerRe, he said, and removes the risk that they might not be realized.

The Axis deal is also less certain because it carries execution risk, the shareholder said. Axis founder John Chairman warned against his former company making an overly dilutive counterbid that could harm Axis, prior to Axis’ decision to bump its offer. If his view is shared by other Axis shareholders, they could tank the proposed merger of equals at the shareholder vote required to validate the deal.

Axis and PartnerRe have yet to schedule the shareholder vote. A person briefed on the matter suggested a late June to early July timeframe.

An Axis shareholder revolt is made more likely by recent takeover rumors, the shareholder argued. A direct insurance provider capable of capturing greater synergies could step in to bid for Axis, likely at a premium to its dilutive proposed deal, he said, asking, “Then what happens to PartnerRe?”

As recently as yesterday, Exor remained confident that its bid was financially and strategically superior to Axis’ sweetened proposal, said a person briefed on the matter. Exor declined to comment when reached today.

While Exor could stay on the sidelines in the hopes that the Axis deal crumbles, two industry bankers said the company is more likely to be proactive.

Exor is unlikely to have gone public with its best and final bid as an initial gesture, the bankers said. The Agnelli family, Exor’s owner, is known for savvy deal-making and is being advised by BDT & Co., a bank with deep expertise in hostile deals, the first banker said. One of BDT’s members organized the buyout consortium from which Alleghany (NYSE:Y) emerged to buy Transatlantic Re (NYSE:TRH) in 2011, ending a five-month takeover battle among Allied World (NYSE:AWH), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A/B), Enstar (NASDAQ:ESGR) and Validus Holdings (NYSE:VR).

The current bid probably represents a fair value for PartnerRe, but Exor’s deep pockets would allow for a sweetener, the bankers said.

(Barron's) Cover Story : Honeywell’s Shares Are a Better Bet Than GE’s

Honeywell’s Shares Are a Better Bet Than GE’s

The industrial company has delivered the kind of results for a decade that GE is now hoping to produce.

Long-suffering General Electric shareholders had cause to cheer last month when the conglomerate announced it would shed its finance arm to focus on its core industrial business. Honeywell International investors may have even more reason to celebrate. Through the huge overhaul, GE has indicated that it can deliver 10% earnings growth annually from its industrial side in the next four years, compared with about half that in its previous form. But Honeywell, an established industrial player, remade itself more than a decade ago and has been delivering on promises of 10%-plus profit growth ever since. It expects to continue to generate that level of growth over the next five years, and, based on its record, there’s every reason to believe it.

In contrast to GE (ticker: GE), which saw its shares lose 33% of their value in the past 13 years as its strategy meandered and its massive financial operations foundered, Honeywell’s stock (HON) has risen 200%. Sales have nearly doubled to $40 billion, and its market value has mushroomed to $80 billion from $20 billion.

Honeywell CEO David Cote has made good on his promises. Photo: Gary Spector for Barron's
The Morristown, N.J.–based company has achieved this growth by successfully managing scores of products, ranging from its familiar home thermostats to sophisticated airplane-cockpit controls to security systems and turbochargers.

Having met an aggressive five-year growth plan that ended in 2014, Honeywell has greater ambitions today. “The stuff that we have coming is even more exciting than the stuff we’ve already done,” says David Cote, the outspoken chief executive responsible for revamping and reinvigorating Honeywell since coming on board in 2002. “We do a very good job of ‘seed planting,’ ” says the GE alumnus and onetime contender to succeed former CEO Jack Welch.

With most of Honeywell’s major businesses doing well, its shares, trading last week at $101.58 -- 16.6 times this year’s expected earnings -- could appreciate by about 20% in the next year and by close to 50% longer term. That’s if it continues to live up to its forecasts and to improve margins. After a recent dividend hike, the stock yields 2%. Shareholders of GE, which fetches a premium to Honeywell, face a more uncertain path.

“Whatever GE can grow at, Honeywell can grow faster and with less risk,” says Scott Lawson, portfolio manager and industrials analyst at Dallas-based Westwood Holdings Group, with $20 billion under management. He expects Honeywell to increase earnings by 12% a year in the next three years, based on management projections. “I am making the assumption Honeywell management will perform with the consistency and proficiency they’ve displayed in the past 10 years,” says Lawson.

HONEYWELL DIVIDES ITS BUSINESSES into three segments: aerospace and avionics, which are responsible for 39% of sales; automation and controls, which kicks in 36%; and performance materials, which contributes 25%.

Aerospace is benefiting from new contracts and more flight hours, while avionics has gained market share, aided by strong demand for its cockpit systems. The segment also should get a lift as U.S. defense spending stabilizes and foreign defense budgets expand.

The automation and control unit, which includes heating, cooling, lighting, and security systems for homes and businesses, is expected to grow 4% to 5% annually over the next few years. Commercial sales have been picking up, and demand for “smart” systems and energy-efficient buildings plays to Honeywell strengths.

Even the performance-materials unit, which has been affected by the ailing oil and gas industry, is expected to make a strong contribution. One big opportunity is its Solstice air-conditioning refrigerant, which stands to gain as European countries require new cars to use a low global-warming refrigerant. That should help the group generate 5% to 6% sales growth.

Honeywell is diversified across business lines and geography, with 45% of revenue coming from the U.S.; 32% from other developed countries; and 23% from developing countries, including China and India. More and more, the focus is on emerging markets, or what Cote refers to as “high-growth regions,” where sales are rising by 10% a year.

All of these businesses are tied together by the operating prowess of Cote and his disciplined management team. A process wonk, Cote is a devotee of W. Edwards Deming, an American engineer and management consultant whose theories were adopted by the Japanese following World War II. They are credited as the force behind the country’s postwar economic revival. Cote has sent managers to Toyota car plants in Kentucky to learn more about the production techniques Deming espoused.


Cote’s latest innovation is the Honeywell Operating System “Gold” program, giving more decision-making power to managers at 74 units within its aerospace, performance-materials, and automation-and-control divisions. The idea is to foster a more entrepreneurial culture that’s responsive to customers and gets product to market faster using the support and efficiencies of a large company.

The CEO is best known for his skill in identifying the best mix of high-margin businesses, boosting productivity, negotiating on prices, keeping costs low, and creating a positive, striving culture.

One indication of his management success: Honeywell has supplanted GE as the favorite hunting ground for executive-search firms looking to fill top jobs.

“We are really going to just drive the hell out of growing a lot faster than anybody else,” says Cote of his team’s objectives.

ASIDE FROM THE ABILITY to make things efficiently, Honeywell offers investors a balance sheet with $7 billion in cash, a selective appetite for acquisitions, a commitment to buy back shares under the right conditions, and a dividend that has risen 10 times since 2005. Its pension fund is practically fully funded.

So you can forgive Cote if he sounds like Rodney Dangerfield at times, complaining that his stock doesn’t get the respect Honeywell’s performance deserves.

He points to the company’s relatively strong first-quarter results in a tough environment: Earnings rose 10%, to $1.1 billion -- the high end of guidance -- while operating profit margins expanded by more than two percentage points. The company raised its earnings outlook for the year, to $6 to $6.15 a share from $5.95 to $6.15.

Although sales came in weaker than expected, they still grew 2% on an organic basis. Pinched by foreign-currency hedging and the divestiture of a business, Honeywell reduced its full-year sales revenue forecast to $39 billion to $39.6 billion from $40.5 billion to $41.1 billion. The company maintained its full-year cash-flow guidance of $4.2 billion to $4.3 billion, up from $3.9 billion a year ago. All in all, Honeywell turned in one of the top performances in the industrial group.

“I think we’re underrated based on our financial performance” is a frequent Cote lament and one he reiterated in our recent phone interview. “We have the lowest price/earnings multiple out there.”

At its recent price, Honeywell trades at 15 times 2016 earnings estimates of $6.69 a share (see table below). That’s well below the 17 times that investors assign to multi-industrial companies on average. Competitors such as GE, 3M (MMM), and Danaher (DHR) trade well above 17 times. By comparison, the Standard & Poor’s 500 is priced at 16 times forward earnings, and its earnings growth rate is a relatively paltry 5%.


Some contend Honeywell should command a premium to its peers not only because of its consistent growth but also for its high-margin software capabilities. More than half of its 22,000 engineers are software developers, and many of its advances, such as building management systems and intelligent sensors for offices and homes, are software driven. That gives it the characteristics of a technology stock, says Jon Naimon, of New York–based Light Green Advisors. It’s just a lot cheaper.

Naimon adds that software-based businesses get a high portion of recurring revenue and higher margins than other businesses. “It’s an underrated high-tech company whose software assets aren’t well recognized,” he says. The stock, Naimon says, would be more fairly valued at a multiple closer to Danaher’s, resulting in a price of about $120 a share.

ONE KNOCK AGAINST Honeywell has been that its profit margins fall short of competitors’. But the gap is closing rapidly as it controls costs more tightly and moves into more profitable businesses. Margins have expanded to 16.6% from 13% in 2009 and are expected to approach peers’ by 2018.

Some critics have also groused about the firm’s capital allocation, questioning the lack of acquisitions. In December, it agreed to buy Datamax-O’Neil, a maker of printers used in bar-code scanning, from Dover for under $200 million, but high prices have kept it from making any major purchases in the past 12 to 18 months.

“We’ve come too far in 13 years to all of a sudden lose our minds when it comes to acquisitions,” Cote notes. “I’m going to stay pretty conservative. We will continue to actively look, but we are going to be smart about it, too, because getting the right price makes a difference.”

COTE IS RIGHT about how far Honeywell has come. It was in disarray when he took the reins in 2002, after a merger with Allied-Signal in 1999 (it took the Honeywell name) and a subsequent, failed bid by GE to buy the company.

Cote was recruited from TRW by former Allied-Signal chief Lawrence Bossidy, also a GE alum. Bossidy had come out of semi-retirement to help restore order after the European Commission had scuttled the GE takeover.

Cote tightened accounting controls, brought together warring political factions, and cut costs. Most importantly, he re-established the company’s credibility, most recently by meeting its five-year plan through 2014. Now, Cote and his team are focused on their new plan, which extends to 2018.

At Honeywell’s March investor conference, Cote ticked off a number of goals. He expects 4% to 6% average annual-sales growth from existing businesses, bringing total revenue to $46 billion to $51 billion; an additional $5 billion to $8 billion in revenue could come from strategic mergers and acquisitions. That would result in an extra $1 a share in earnings that could exceed $9 a share by 2018.

If M&A falls short and net cash exceeds $1 billion to $2 billion, Cote is committed to buying back shares to get the extra bang in earnings per share.

Continued operational improvements and cost containment will lift margins by another two percentage points, to 18.5% or more from the 16.6% in 2014. Cote expects Honeywell to generate $30 billion to $33 billion in cash -- $10 billion of that to be paid out in dividends. He’s also targeting a dividend payout ratio of 40%, up from the current 34%.

“The outperformance is going to continue,” Cote vows. Taking him at his word has usually proved profitable to Honeywell shareholders. GE investors can only wait and hope things work out.

(Barron's) Conservative Party Win Is Good News for Banks

Conservative Party Win Is Good News for Banks
Beneficiaries include companies that might have suffered under a Labour-led government, such as utilities, outsourcing providers, and banks.

Investors in Great Britain got some unexpected good news Thursday. Surprising pollsters and pundits, the Conservative Party, led by Prime Minister David Cameron, won a slender majority in parliamentary elections.

Victory for the Conservatives, known as the Tories, means there will be no drawn-out negotiations with rivals to form a coalition and removes some of the uncertainty weighing on the British pound and on United Kingdom equities in the near term.

Sterling racked up a gain of more than 1% against the dollar, and was trading at $1.543 Friday afternoon , its highest level since February. London’s benchmark FTSE 100 index surged 0.9%, as investors breathed a huge sigh of relief that something like a political status quo has been maintained.

It is an outcome that few, if any, had predicted. Opinion polls suggested that the Tories and the Labour Party would win the lion’s share of the votes, but neither would win enough seats in the House of Commons, the lower house, to govern alone.

But the Tories won 331 of the 650 seats up for grabs, surpassing the 325 needed for a majority.

Political pundits spent weeks poring over coalition possibilities. The Scottish Nationalist Party was expected to be the king maker. The SNP did better than expected, securing 56 seats, largely at the expense of Labour, which won only 232 in a disappointing showing.

Stewardship of the British economy was a central theme in the campaign, and voters clearly felt more comfortable leaving management in the hands of the center-right Tories.

Defying International Monetary Fund forecasts, the Tories, in coalition with the Liberal Democrats for the past five years, have steered the U.K. away from recession to a position of health. Gross domestic product growth this year is estimated at 2.8%, above the European average.

Conservative governments are more pro-business than their Labour foes. Historically, in the month after a Tory election win, the FTSE 100 index has outperformed by five percentage points, while after a Labour victory it has underperformed by one percentage point, says John Baker, who manages the JPMorgan Intrepid European fund (ticker: VEUAX). “That could be a profitable trade,” he says.

Beneficiaries include companies that could have suffered under a Labour-led government, such as utilities and outsourcing providers. Those sectors were targeted by Labour for price caps and more regulation.

Arguably, the biggest winner is the banking sector. Labour had advocated squeezing an extra 800 million pounds ($1.23 billion) from the bank levy, an annual tax on the value of debts in U.K. banks, which would have cut 2016 consensus earnings by 2% to 8%.

It is an emotional issue for London-based HSBC Holdings (HSBA.UK) and Standard Chartered (STAN.UK). Both have enormous asset bases overseas. HSBC last month said that it was considering moving its domicile to another jurisdiction. HSBC’s sizable contribution to government coffers would be difficult to replace. In all likelihood, a Tory government could seek to strike bargains on the banking levy with HSBC and Standard Chartered to ensure they stay put.

Another positive for banks could be a pickup in the housing market. Fears that Labour would impose a tax on high-end homes or other duties have given consumers cause to put off making those kinds of decisions in recent months.

But with a more certain outlook, there could be a pickup in activity. Royal Bank of Scotland Group (RBS.UK), a leading lender, could benefit.

RBS shares rallied 6.1% Friday to close at £3.52. They have performed poorly in 2015, losing about 11% in value, while the Stoxx Europe 600 banks subsector has added about 15%. RBS trades at 13 times 2016 projected earnings of 25 pence per share, but just 0.7 times tangible book value, a preferred measure among analysts for assessing the worth of banks.

The government owns about 62% of RBS as a result of a bailout during the financial crisis. Chancellor George Osborne has indicated that selling down that stake would be a priority after the election. Eradicating that overhang would be positive.

Lloyds Banking Group (LLOY.UK) also has a clearer path ahead. Defeat for Labour removes the threat of market-share caps, which presented a tail risk for Lloyds. It is on course for a core Tier 1 capital ratio of about 14.6% in 2016, which should drive a rerating. Lloyds shares, which closed at 87 pence Friday, trade at 11 times forecast 2016 earnings, and at a price-to- tangible book value of 1.6 times.

THE TORY WIN COMES AT A PRICE in the longer term. Cameron has pledged to hold a referendum on U.K. membership in the European Union by the end of 2017, an event that could haunt sterling for the next couple of years.

An EU exit would be damaging for the U.K., creating barriers to trade and investment. Analysts suggest there is little chance that the U.K. will leave the EU, but, as this election has shown, predictions can be wrong.

Another potential headache: The SNP’s strong showing in Scotland could prompt calls for a rerun of last year’s referendum on Scottish independence. That’s something the new government would want to avoid.

(BFW) Ahold, Delahize Decline to Comment on Merger Talks Report


MORE: Ahold, Delahize Decline to Comment on Merger Talks Report
2015-05-09 09:20:26.913 GMT


By Celeste Perri and James G. Neuger
(Bloomberg) -- Ahold, Delhaize spokesmen separately say
companies decline to comment on market speculation.
* Earlier: Delhaize, Ahold in preliminary talks on possible
merger, De Tijd and L’Echo report, citing “several
sources”
* Link to report


Story Link:NSN NO2LOJ6S9728<GO>

Story Link:NSN NO2O856JIJUP<GO>

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story:
Celeste Perri in Amsterdam at +31-20-589-8505 or
cperri@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Celeste Perri at +31-20-589-8505 or
cperri@bloomberg.net
Steve Bailey

>>> Weekly Update

Weekly Market Update: Tory Surprise and US Jobs Report Save the Week

Global equities lost altitude through Thursday as the parade of poor economic data and bond market choppiness continued. Early in the week, the ADP jobs report raised real worries that the US would see another anemic payrolls number for April, while Chinese trade data was concerning. There was no breakthrough on Greece, with both sides seemingly committed to forcing negotiations down to the wire. The global bond market rout continued apace this week and the surge in yields kept pressure on stocks worldwide, nudged further by Fed Chair Yellen weighing in on equity valuations. The stampede out of stocks and bonds sent European indexes to their lowest levels in two months. Note that the UST 10-year yield peaked just below 2.3% on Wednesday and then headed back below 2.12%, while the 10-year Bund peaked around 0.777% on Thursday and quickly dropped below 0.540% by Friday. The surprise landslide victory by the Conservative government in UK elections and Friday's not-too-hot, not-too-cold US jobs report helped equities recoup their losses for the week, with DJIA gaining 0.9%, the S&P500 adding 0.4% and the Nasdaq ending just above flat.

Fed Chair Yellen raised eyebrows on Wednesday after commenting on equity market valuations in a panel discussion. "I would highlight that equity market valuations at this point generally are quite high," said Yellen. "There are potential dangers there." Commentators compared Yellen's remarks to her call on biotech valuations a year ago as well as Alan Greenspan's notorious "irrational exuberance" comments. "We've also seen the compression of spreads on high-yield debt, which certainly looks like a reach for yield type of behavior," added Yellen. She also warned that another potential trouble spot was low long-term interest rates, which could spike as the Fed normalizes its policy, causing disruption across the financial system.

On Thursday, European bond yields had a serious hiccup, with the yield on the German 10-year Bund surging by as much as 21 bps to 0.80%, its highest level since last November, before easing back below 0.60%. Interestingly, peripheral Europe yields saw weaker gains and then fell significantly as buyers stepped in. There was no apparent proximate cause for the spike, besides a general lack of liquidity. Analysts have begun watching the rebound in yields with a certain degree of skepticism: the oil price rebound helped blunt fears of outright deflation, relieving some of the pressure on yields. The euro has reversed course and has begun strengthening, and European stocks have been heading lower in the face of Greek chaos. Economic data is not showing a big improvement in the real economy.

The April jobs report showed the US labor market bounced back firmly from the anemic March results. April non-farm payrolls rose to 228K, about in line with expectations, but the March figure was slashed to 86K from the already disappointing 126K. Unemployment fell to 5.4% from 5.5% in March. Hourly earnings fell slightly, raising worries that wage pressures were not sufficient to deliver much more economic growth. The biggest jobs growth was in white-collar and healthcare sectors, construction saw modest gains, while manufacturing was flat.

The US trade deficit rose 43% y/y to $51.5 billion in March (a six-month high), reflecting a surge of imports that followed the settlement of the West Coast port dispute. Exports edged up 0.9% to $187.8 billion, but imports leaped a record 7.7% to $239.2 billion. Economists say the numbers were less favorable than those used to calculate advance Q1 US GDP, however it remains unclear how much the imports will boost March inventory numbers and their impact on Q1 US GDP revisions.

UK Prime Minister David Cameron won an absolute majority in Britain's Parliamentary elections, taking 326 of the 650 seats up for grabs in the House of Commons. The outcome was surprising after weeks of polls that had been predicting a dead heat between Labour and the Conservatives. Labour's Ed Miliband said he would step down as party leader after his party's share fell to 229 seats from 258 prior. Nick Clegg resigned as leader of the Liberal Democrats after a disastrous result for his party, whose representation fell to eight seats from 57 prior.

Negotiations between Europe, the IMF and Greece went back and forth again this week and became even more divisive. Greek Finance Minister Varoufakis reinserted himself in the mix, denying he had been sidelined and claiming he was prepared to go "down to the wire" in talks. Greece made its payment to the IMF this week, while the next big payment is €745 due on May 12th. There were no signs that the two sides would be able to reach a deal at the Eurogroup meeting on Monday, May 11th. The ECB doled out another ELA expansion to the Greek banking system but deferred making a decision on collateral haircuts to next week. The ECB has used bank collateral obligations as a bargaining chip in bailout negotiations, and by deferring the decision it allows the EU to put a bit more pressure on the Greeks.

The gains in oil prices continued through midweek, with WTI coming within a dollar of the $70 level on Wednesday after the DoE weekly report included the first draw-down in crude inventories since early January. There has been a persistent feeling that the worst of the oil rout is over and prices were seeking a new, higher level, however traders warned of persistent weakness in the physical market (and it was softness in crude deliveries that wreaked havoc late last summer). EIA and OPEC data shows the world still producing more oil than it consumes, and a report that Iranian oil production capacity would be around 3.96M bpd in 2016 helped take futures off their highs.

The March quarter earnings season is slowly winding down. Ecommerce giant Alibaba saw revenue up nearly 50%, with users and mobile metrics rising sharply. Chairman Jack Ma also decided to reinvigorate his management team by bringing in a new CEO. Comcast hit an important milestone, as subscribers for internet service now outnumber cable TV subscribers. Sprint's headline numbers were a bit disappointing, but its widely watched churn rates improved. Green Mountain tanked after missing top- and bottom-line expectations and cutting its FY forecast. Whole Foods said it would launch a new "value-oriented" chain, upsetting some investors. Metlife and Prudential reported firm first quarter results.

McDonalds unveiled its big turnaround strategy. The main focus will be reorganization into four new corporate segments in an effort to strip away unwanted layers of management. McDonald's will also refranchise more than 3,000 restaurants through 2018, bringing its total percentage of franchised restaurants to 90% from 81% globally. Improving food quality will be a top priority. Friday MCD reported April SSS that were down again, by 0.6% globally, but the stock rallied after the decline was less then generally expected.

Lumber Liquidators suspended sales of Chinese laminate flooring, bowing to accusations that the products had dangerous levels of formaldehyde. The firm insisted that while 97% of 26,000 indoor air quality tests with kits provided by the company came back clear, it would suspend sales until a special committee looking into all allegations wrapped up its work. The sudden gain in LL's stock price after the announcement evaporated within hours. Meanwhile, activist Whitney Tilson told CNBC that the development would be the decisive point in the eventual collapse of Lumber Liquidators and disclosed he had "materially increased" his short position.

Alexion Pharmaceuticals agreed to pay a huge premium to buy rare disease specialist Synageva BioPharma for $8.4 billion in cash and stock. Notably, Synageva has no products on the market. Alexion officials said the deal will help their company accelerate and diversify its revenue growth and expand its manufacturing abilities. Alexion's shares tumbled after the deal was announced as investors decided the firm was overpaying.

Trade data out of China showed more signs of slowing growth in the domestic economy. April imports declined for the sixth month in a row, and it was the fourth consecutive month in which imports dropped by a double digit percentage. Chinese exports fell for the second straight month, dismissing hopes of a seasonal rebound while adding to the expectation the PBoC is close to stepping in again. Meanwhile, the China April final HSBC manufacturing PMI sank lower, racking up the biggest contraction in a year. The Shanghai Composite traded down by over 7.5% at its low point of the week before Friday's 2% rally on rate cut expectations. Inflation data due out early Saturday morning in China is expected to show CPI continuing a rebound off of five-year lows registered in January.

>>> US Close Dow+1,39% S&P+1,17% Nasdaq+1,42% Russell+0,77%

Closing Market Summary: Employment Report Helps Stocks Erase Weekly Losses

The stock market enjoyed a broad-based surge on Friday, which helped the S&P 500 (+1.4%) erase its weekly loss. As a result, the benchmark index added 0.4% for the week.

Equity indices registered the bulk of their gains at the open thanks to a pair of factors that underpinned the sharp spike before the first trade was made in the cash market. First, the UK general election proved surprising as conservatives expanded their presence in the parliament and won 331 of 650 seats. Meanwhile, Ed Miliband (Labour), Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrats), and Nigel Farage (UKIP) resigned from leading their respective parties. Although the results were surprising, markets cheered the preservation of status quo with UK's FTSE surging 2.3%.

Index futures held modest gains following the election results and they extended their gains once the U.S. Nonfarm Payrolls report for April beat expectations (223K; consensus 218K); however, it is worth noting that the March reading was revised down to 85K from 126K and hourly earnings growth remained weak (+0.1%; consensus +0.2%).

The report sparked a fire under equities and Treasuries as lackadaisical wage growth is likely to be used as an argument in favor of the Federal Reserve maintaining its current policy stance for longer. Treasuries soared in reaction to the report, but they retreated from their highs during the afternoon. Still, the 10-yr note ended in the green with its yield down four basis points at 2.14%. The benchmark yield narrowed its weekly increase to two-basis points and ended the week beneath its 200-day moving average (2.19%).

All ten sectors finished the day in positive territory and only three groups posted gains slimmer than 1.0%. Materials (+1.6%) and health care (+1.6%) jockeyed for the lead throughout the session, but the energy sector (+1.6%) overtook them both as part of a late rally. On a related note, crude oil rose 0.7% to $59.42/bbl.

Moving on, the health care sector received a boost from biotechnology with iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB 351.93, +7.82) spiking 2.3%, and above its 50-day moving average, which had been an area of focus during the past two weeks.

Interestingly, today's broad advance masked the underperformance among a couple other high-beta areas like chipmakers and transport stocks.

The PHLX Semiconductor Index gained 1.0%, but spent the day behind the broader market as NVIDIA (NVDA 20.81, -1.68) weighed. Shares of NVDA fell 7.5% after the company reported in-line results and guided lower. That being said, the broader technology sector (+1.4%) ended a step ahead of the broader market with large cap names like Apple (AAPL 127.52, +2.26), Google (GOOGL 548.95, +6.91), and Microsoft (MSFT 47.75, +1.05) picking up the slack. Microsoft was a standout, climbing 2.3% after Reuters reported the company is no longer looking to acquire Salesforce.com (CRM 72.40, -2.12).

Elsewhere, the industrial sector (+1.2%) settled just behind the broader market even as transport stocks underperformed with the Dow Jones Transportation Average advancing 0.6%. Five components of the bellwether complex registered losses with Landstar System (LSTR 63.18, -0.86) sliding 1.3%.

Today's participation was below recent averages as 759 million shares changed hands at the NYSE floor.

Economic data included Nonfarm Payrolls and Wholesale Inventories:
  • Nonfarm payrolls added 223,000 new jobs in April, up from a downwardly revised 85,000 (from 126,000) in March while the consensus expected an increase of 218,000 
    • Private payrolls increased by 213,000 jobs in April after adding a downwardly revised 94,000 (from 129,000) in March while the consensus expected an increase of 215,000 
    • The average hourly wage increased 0.1% in April after increasing a downwardly revised 0.2% in March 
      • The average workweek remained at 34.5 hours for a second consecutive month 
      • The combination of the increase in payrolls and wages along with constant hours pushed aggregate earnings levels up 0.3% in April. Earnings were flat in March 
    • The unemployment rate fell to 5.4% in April from 5.5% in March, which met consensus expectations 
  • Wholesale inventories increased 0.1% in March after increasing a downwardly revised 0.2% (from 0.3%) in February while the consensus expected an increase of 0.3% 
    • The BEA assumed that wholesale inventories increased 0.6% in the advance Q1 2015 GDP report. The downside miss in March combined with the revisions to February will result in a downward revision to first quarter GDP when the second estimate is released at the end of the month 
There is no economic data on Monday's schedule.
  • Nasdaq Composite +5.4% YTD
  • S&P 500 +2.7% YTD
  • Russell 2000 +2.3% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average +2.0% YTD