TheChek News Flow

• This framework suggests, first, that much of the recent shortfall of inflation from our 2 percent objective is attributable to special factors whose effects are likely to prove transitory.
• As the solid blue portion of the bars shows, falling consumer energy prices explain about half of this year's shortfall and a sizable portion of the 2013 and 2014 shortfalls as well. Another important source of downward pressure this year has been a decline in import prices, the portion with orange checkerboard pattern, which is largely attributable to the 15 percent appreciation in the dollar's exchange value over the past year. In contrast, the restraint imposed by economic slack, the green dotted portion, has diminished steadily over time as the economy has recovered and is now estimated to be relatively modest.
• Fortunately, prospects for the U.S. economy generally appear solid. Monthly payroll gains have averaged close to 210,000 since the start of the year and the overall economy has been expanding modestly faster than its productive potential. My colleagues and I, based on our most recent forecasts, anticipate that this pattern will continue and that labor market conditions will improve further as we head into 2016.
• Although the unemployment rate may now be close to its longer-run normal level--which most FOMC participants now estimate is around 4.9 percent--this traditional metric of resource utilization almost certainly understates the actual amount of slack that currently exists: On a cyclically adjusted basis, the labor force participation rate remains low relative to its underlying trend, and an unusually large number of people are working part time but would prefer full-time employment.
• First, the real federal funds rate is currently somewhat below the level that would be consistent with real GDP expanding in line with potential, which implies that the unemployment rate is likely to continue to fall in the absence of some tightening. Second, participants implicitly expect that the various headwinds to economic growth that I mentioned earlier will continue to fade, thereby boosting the economy's underlying strength. Combined, these two judgments imply that the real interest rate consistent with achieving and then maintaining full employment in the medium run should rise gradually over time. his expectation, coupled with inherent lags in the response of real activity and inflation to changes in monetary policy, are the key reasons that most of my colleagues and I anticipate that it will likely be appropriate to raise the target range for the federal funds rate sometime later this year and to continue boosting short-term rates at a gradual pace thereafter as the labor market improves further and inflation moves back to our 2 percent objective.
• As I noted, most of my colleagues and I anticipate that economic conditions are likely to warrant raising short-term interest rates at a quite gradual pace over the next few years.
• The economic outlook, of course, is highly uncertain and it is conceivable, for example, that inflation could remain appreciably below our 2 percent target despite the apparent anchoring of inflation expectations. Here, Japan's recent history may be instructive.
• The Committee is monitoring developments abroad, but we do not currently anticipate that the effects of these recent developments on the U.S. economy will prove to be large enough to have a significant effect on the path for policy.
• Why not hold off raising the federal funds rate until the economy has reached full employment and inflation is actually back at 2 percent? The difficulty with this strategy is that monetary policy affects real activity and inflation with a substantial lag. If the FOMC were to delay the start of the policy normalization process for too long, we would likely end up having to tighten policy relatively abruptly to keep the economy from significantly overshooting both of our goals. Such an abrupt tightening would risk disrupting financial markets and perhaps even inadvertently push the economy into recession. In addition, continuing to hold short-term interest rates near zero well after real activity has returned to normal and headwinds have faded could encourage excessive leverage and other forms of inappropriate risk-taking that might undermine financial stability. For these reasons, the more prudent strategy is to begin tightening in a timely fashion and at a gradual pace, adjusting policy as needed in light of incoming data.

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings: JBL +9.3%, NKE +7.9%, AEHR +6.2%, CTAS +0.1%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: BLPH +80.9% (positive data from an interim analysis of its Phase 2 long-term extension study of INOpulse for the treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension; receives SPA for its phase 3 PAH program), MRVL +5.3% (announced restructuring of its mobile platform business, expects the initiative to result in annualized operating expense savings in the range of $170-220 mln), WMIH +4.1% (received approval to list on Nasdaq effective September 28), ADRO +3.7% (to acquire BioNovion for EUR 29 mln), RAI +1.0% (Bloomberg reporting Japan Tobacco is in talks to acquire ~$5 bln of RAI's assets)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings: INAP -15.1%, PIR -7.4%, BBBY -0.9%, BHLB -0.7%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: PETX -8.0% (provided product update; co does not believe AT-004 or AT-005 in their current, first-generation forms will capture the desired lymphoma market opportunity), CTIC -3.9% (announced a 10 mln share registered direct offering at $1.57 per share), EMES -3.6% (withdrew its previously announced distribution guidance for 2015 due to 'difficult' market conditions in its Sand and Fuel segments), SLW -1.0% (received notices of reassessment from the Canada Revenue Agency relating to its 2005 to 2010 taxation years), DB -0.9% (ordered to face $190 mln U.S. government tax fraud lawsuit, according to Reuters report)