>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance/SSS
: OOMA +10.5%, MEI +6.2%, SEAC +4.5%, PLNT +1.4%, OXM +0.5%, CPB +0.5%, COST +0.4%

M&A news: LCI MM +29.1% (to be acquired by Verizon's (VZ) AOL for $1.75/share), +15.4% (to acquire Kremers Urban Pharmaceuticals for $1.23 bln; expects the deal to be accretive to adjusted EPS in FY16 in the mid-high single digits and 20-25% in FY17)

Select EU related names showing strength: ASML +3.1%, ERIC +1.9%, AZN +1.8%, SNY +1.6%, MU +1%, NVO +0.9%

Other news: GERN +19.3% (announces publication of two papers in The New England Journal of Medicine that highlight the potential of imetelstat in hematologic malignancies ), ISR +9% (extended its international distribution agreement with Karlheinz Goehl-Medizintechnik Goehl), ACAD +9% (submits a New Drug Application to the FDA seeking approval for NUPLAZID for the treatment of psychosis associated with Parkinson's disease), CYTX +7.6% (announced that the first patient has been enrolled and treated in the ADRESU trial), SUNE +3.8% (Bloomberg profiles interview CEO who indicated cash flows might be coming in 2016), TTPH +3.2% (announces that the FDA has granted Qualified Infectious Disease Product and Fast Track designations for IV TP-271), SYT +2.8% (authorizes $2 bln share repurchase program; divests seed business; reiterates the full year guidance), MNOV +2.5% (reports the first advanced ALS patient enrolled in Phase 2 clinical trial of MN-166), ARMH +2.3% (IBM (IBM) announced an expansion of its Internet of Things platform -- called IBM IoT Foundation - through an integration with ARM (ARMH)),DOW +2% (commences its exchange offer for the split-off of a significant portion of its chlorine value chain ), NAVB +2% (awarded a $1.8M fast track NIH SBIR grant for the evaluation of Tc99m tilmanocept), TSLA +1.9% (Musk tweets "Model 3, our smaller and lower cost sedan will start production in about 2 years. Fully operational Gigafactory needed."), ATRO +0.9% (selected to supply the Passenger Service Units, on a new family of long-range Boeing (BA) 777X aircraft), NUE +0.8% (announced $900 mln share repurchase program)

Analyst comments: FMS +3.4% (upgraded to Buy at Goldman), FRAN +2.5% (upgraded to Outperform at Wedbush), SFUN +2% (upgraded to Buy at Credit Agricole), HAL +1.6% (upgraded to Buy at HSBC), SLB +1.2% (upgraded to Buy at Citigroup), FR +1.1% (upgraded to Outperform at Raymond James), EBAY +1% (upgraded to Neutral at Piper Jaffray
)

(BFW) Israel Govt Weighs Transfer of Authority Over Gas Plan: Radio


Israel Govt Weighs Transfer of Authority Over Gas Plan: Radio
2015-09-03 12:22:46.626 GMT


By Calev Ben-David
(Bloomberg) -- Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu working on
plan to transfer authority over natural gas framework from
Economy Ministry to cabinet, Israel Radio says, without citing
sources

* Netanyahu will move forward on plan next week only if he is
certain it will be approved by Knesset
* NOTE: Gas policy has stalled in Economy Ministry
* NOTE: Israel’s Deri to Wait for New Antitrust Head to Deal
With Gas {NTP3VG6JTSEE}


Link to Company News:{DLEKG IT <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{DEDRL IT <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{AVNRL IT <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{RATIL IT <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{NBL US <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{ISRAL IT <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>}
First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the reporter on this story:
Calev Ben-David in Jerusalem at +972-2-640-1105 or
cbendavid@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Amy Teibel at +972-2-640-1107 or
ateibel@bloomberg.net

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
Gapping up: GERN +20%, LCI +19.7%, CYTX +13.2%, ISR +6.2%, SEAC +4.5%, FMS +4.4%, ASML +2.9%, SUNE +2.9%, TSLA +2.5%, OOMA +2.2%, ARMH +2%, ERIC +1.9%, SNY +1.8%, HAL +1.8%, NVO +1.7%, SWKS +1.7%, AZN +1.5%, FAST +1.5%, MU +1.3%, FIT +1.2%, SLB +1.2%, RIO +1.2%, BABA +1%, ATRO +0.9%, TOT +0.9%, NUE +0.8%, SHPG+0.6%, GPRO +0.5%, OXM +0.5%, CIEN +0.5%

Gapping down: FIVE -8.5%, VRNT -7.1%, CTLT -6.8%, MIND -5.4%, JOY -4.3%, NEOS -3.1%, RLI -2.2%, DV -2.1%, ETH -1.8%, SDRL -1.5%, PLNT -0.8%, HY -0.7%, LE -0.5%

(GS) Global Markets Daily: Bull market interrupted


 

 

Goldman Sachs Global Macro Research

 

Global Markets Daily: Bull market interrupted (Timcenko)


Published September 3, 2015

  • After a mid-August downturn, markets remain unsettled and volatility remains elevated …
  •  
  • … but, over the past year, elevated volatility has been positively correlated with strong forward returns.
  •  
  • The risk of sharp and swift downturns in risky assets remains, fuelled by high equity valuations, elevated rate volatility and questions about forward growth, in particular in China.
  •  
  • As the global cycle enters the Slowdown phase, the frequency of drawdowns may increase, as future prospects become less transparent …
  •  
  • … but, historically, after the initial fall, stocks tend to regain most, sometimes all, of the lost ground within the next 3 to 12 months.
  •  
  • The August equity selloff was one of the swiftest on record …
  •  
  • … with limited low cross-sectional dispersion of returns and limited apparent macro profile.
  •  
  • If equities are to continue to recover, the key is a stabilization of growth.
  •  


1. Market overview

Yesterday, it was the turn of a market uptick: after Tuesday’s sharp losses, the S&P 500 was up 180bp, amid relatively light trading. Oil prices registered a similar rally, with a 180bp gain coming on the heels of the previous day’s very large 770bp slide. The Dollar broadly strengthened as well, and yields in the US sold off a couple of basis points. The VIX index also eased slightly, once again closing below the 30 mark.

Wednesday’s macro data pickings were relatively meager. At 190K, the August ADP National Employment Report was a touch below expectations. The Fed’s Beige Book, an anecdotal summary of business conditions reported by regional banks, was consistent with continuing expansion.

Noteworthy data releases and events over the next few days include Service PMI releases for most major economies, the ECB meeting today and the US non-farm payrolls release on Friday.

2. Bull market interrupted, once again

After a remarkably quiet period earlier this year, the US equity market, alongside other key global markets, has hit some rough waters over the last few weeks. In a period of little more than a week, the S&P 500 and Germany’s DAX indices retreated around 12%, Chinese H-shares fell around 14%, US 10-year yields rallied close to 2%, and oil prices fell sharply to below $30/bbl. Since then, markets have regained some of the lost ground, but volatility remains elevated and daily price seesawing continues. After languishing in the low-teens for the better part of the year, the 'fear factor' index, also known as the VIX, spiked to above 40 during the height of the market downturn and remains elevated. This marked only the seventh episode in its quarter-century history when it has broken the 40 mark, but – at least so far – it did not stay there for more than a single day.

We often refer to these sharp and sudden downturns in the market as 'drawdowns' (see Global Economics Weekly: Equity drawdowns: Bull market interrupted, not the dawn of a new era, July 10, 2013). Drawdowns represent a measure of maximal 'pain' that holding a position inflicts, defined as the most negative peak-to-trough move over a period of time. While it is intimately related to other measures of risk, it more explicitly expresses what stands to be lost when holding a particular position.

Earlier this year, we wrote about an elevated risk of 'drawdowns' (see GOAL: Upgrading credit to Overweight; heightened equity drawdown risk, Mar 27, 2015), fuelled by a confluence of higher rate volatility, high valuations, the Greek crisis and worries about EM growth. Indeed, it appears that one of the main catalysts for the current drop is concern surrounding China growth. While market pullbacks of the magnitude we just witnessed do occur, they are relatively rare outside of recessions, and, as we will outline below, often lead to positive returns in subsequent months. Over the last year in particular, elevated volatility was positively correlated with strong forward returns (see Global Macro Risks in Focus: Risk off moves turning indiscriminate, Aug 25, 2015, Exhibit 14).

3. Drawdowns abound in Slowdown

Over the past 25 years, the median drawdown of the S&P 500 index over a period of one month has been around 3%, and 5.5% over a quarter. Not surprisingly, they are the most common and the most violent during the Contraction phase of the business cycle, when growth is falling at an accelerated pace, and the most benign during the Expansion phase, when growth is positive and sequentially improving.

According to our Global Leading Indicator (see Global Leading Indicator: August Final GLI – Slide into Slowdown, Sep 1, 2015), the global cycle is currently in the Slowdown phase, when global growth is positive but sequentially weakening. When the cycle is in Slowdown, the median drawdown for the S&P 500 during a three-month period is around 5%.

Starting in 1985, there were 31 episodes of the S&P 500 falling by 10% or more during a period of at most two months. (We limited the 'window' over which we look for the worst peak-to-trough performance in order to study forward returns over longer horizons – from one quarter to one year – relative to the registered trough.) Of all of these sharp drawdown episodes, 35% occurred in Slowdowns, 30% in Recovery and Contraction, and only around 5% in Expansion.

Elevated incidence of sharp drawdowns in Slowdown is not coincidental. The Slowdown phase often tends to be 'opaque' and difficult to navigate. Indeed, it has two possible 'exits': one is back to Expansion and a return to strong positive trends, and the other is to extend downturn into Contraction and to result in further market weakness. It is no surprise, then, that significant (that is, worse than 10%) drawdown episodes happen most often during Slowdowns. This is even more exacerbated if we exclude recession periods when negative returns are a norm: outside of recessions, Slowdowns account for 2 out of 5 of 10%-or-worse drawdowns.

4. Once the storm passes, returns tend to improve too

Once the 'worst' of the drawdown is over, prices tend to recover over a period of time that is, for most global equity indices, roughly twice as long as the drawdown period itself lasted. On the face of it, this suggests that a week-long drawdown – more-or-less a period of time we went through in mid-August – will take two weeks to return back to previous levels. But there are some important caveats here. First, the current episode was among the 'fastest' on record – 'black Monday' in 1987, markets drops during the GFC and the European crisis in the summer of 2011 were the only instances when the market gave up 10% or more in less time than now. Second, there is substantial uncertainty around this estimate. And, third, the recovery period tends to get longer for deeper drawdowns. However, in defence of the '1-for-2' rule for the recovery period, it held reasonably well during various 'mini-drawdowns' over the course of last year.

More formally, after a drop of 10% or more in the S&P 500 index, median forward returns tend to become positive. Over all 31 instances of drawdowns we studied, and relative to the market trough, one-month, three-month and one-year forward returns were all positive, with the market returning to pre-drawdown levels between 3 and 12 months after the onset of the drawdown.

5. Current episode: Low dispersion of returns suggests low macro content

A cross-section of asset returns often contains information on the fundamental drivers of market moves, as the 'principal' market driver tends to be correlated with a spread between best-performing and worst-performing assets. The opposite is, however, also true: a lack of asset returns’ dispersion, or an unclear distinction between market winners and losers, suggests a lack of a 'principal' market driver, or an organizing theme that can explain market shifts. This is often the case in sharp 'risk-off' market moves that, while possibly reflecting pent-up pressures, often do not have proximate fundamental catalysts.

The current episode is one such example. Looking both at global equity indices and US equity sectors, the cross-sectional dispersion of equity returns was lower only two other times – once again, during Black Monday and during the European crisis in 2011.

In addition, there is the natural question: what is this episode like? A cross-section of asset returns can offer some suggestions here too: the correlation of returns between different episodes singles out the European crisis from 2011 as the past episode most similar to the recent experience, when the profile of equity returns turned out to be most similar to what we have observed now.

6. Is it over yet?

That, indeed, is the question. Past episodes of drawdowns outside of recession periods and market downturns over the past year suggest that these episodes tend to be relatively short-lived and lead to slow and gradual improvements over subsequent weeks and months. But that is, clearly, conditioned by decent global growth. The global cycle has slowed down over the last three months, and it continues to do so, buffeted among other things by questions about Chinese growth and by the overall softening of fundamental data. Thus, a possible equity recovery after the August squall is strongly linked to the stabilization of the global growth picture.

7. Tactical Trading Views

The following trading ideas from the Global Markets Group reflect shorter-term views, which may differ from the longer-term ‘structural’ positions included in our ‘Top Trades’ list further below.

On Rates:

  1. Stay short 10-year US Treasuries and long 10-year Bunds, opened on 17 Jul 2015 at a spread of 153bp, with a target of 190bp and a stop loss of 130bp, currently trading at 139bp.

8. Recommended Top Trades for 2015

Longer-term structural views are expressed in our Top Trade recommendations. These are typically managed with a wide stop, and assessed on the basis of whether the fundamentals continue to support the medium-term investment theme.

  1. Stay long EUR/$ downside via 1-year 1.00/0.95 put spread (originally at 1.20/1.15 with a premium of 70bp EUR at initiation), expiring on 20 Nov 2015, opened at a spot EUR/$ of 1.253 on 20 Nov 2014, currently at 1.122.
  2. Close constant maturity 10-year US Treasury 3.00-3.50% ‘cap-spread’, funded by selling a corresponding 2.24-1.75% ‘floor spread’ , opened on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential return of 0%.
  3. Close long Dec-2015 Eurostoxx 50 3150/3450 ‘bull’ call spread on 19 Feb 2015, opened at 101.5 on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential payout of c1.8-to-1.
  4. Close long risk on the 5-year CDX HY 23 junior mezzanine tranche (the 15-25% portion of the loss distribution) on 6 Apr 2015, opened at 495bp on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential unlevered gain of 5.2%.
  5. Close long basket of EM crude oil importers stock markets, implemented via equal part of TWSE and NIFTY indices (XU030 closed as of 1 Apr 2015), opened at 100 on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential loss of 8%.
  6. Close short CHF/SEK on 15 Jan 2015, opened at 7.70 on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential loss of 16.5% including carry.
  7. Close short Dec-15 LME Copper futures and long Dec-15 LME Nickel futures on 23 March 2015, for a potential gain of 0.3% on the relative value trade.
  8. Close long USD against a basket of HUF and ZAR on 21 Jan 2015, opened at 100 on 20 Nov 2014, for a potential gain of 8% including carry.
  9. Stay long USD against a basket of ZAR and KRW (on a spot basis), opened at 100 on 3 Feb 2015, with a target of 115 (extended from 110) and a stop on a close below 97.5 (raised from 95), currently at 112.8.

 

 
 

 

 

http://t.sidekickopen01.com/e1t/o/5/f18dQhb0S7ks8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9gXrN7sKj6v5dlQxW4XyQDd4WrNJRW5wf5Jx3LvrVvW85mN421k1H6H0?si=5651968104595456&pi=92fce104-79ef-400a-b569-d96c62481100

(ZeroHedge) Russian Military Forces Arrive In Syria, Set Forward Operating Base

While military direct intervention by US, Turkish, and Gulf forces over Syrian soil escalates with every passing day, even as Islamic State forces capture increasingly more sovereign territory, in the central part of the country, the Nusra Front dominant in the northwestern region province of Idlib and the official "rebel" forces in close proximity to Damascus, the biggest question on everyone's lips has been one: would Putin abandon his protege, Syria's president Assad, to western "liberators" in the process ceding control over Syrian territory which for years had been a Russian national interest as it prevented the passage of regional pipelines from Qatar and Saudi Arabia into Europe, in the process eliminating Gazprom's - and Russia's - influence over the continent.
As recently as a month ago, the surprising answer appeared to be an unexpected "yes", as we described in detail in "The End Draws Near For Syria's Assad As Putin's Patience "Wears Thin." Which would make no sense: why would Putin abdicate a carefully cultivated relationship, one which served both sides (Russia exported weapons, provides military support, and in exchange got a right of first and only refusal on any traversing pipelines through Syria) for years, just to take a gamble on an unknown future when the only aggressor was a jihadist spinoff which had been created as byproduct of US intervention in the region with the specific intention of achieving precisely this outcome: overthrowing Assad (see "Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad").
As it turns out, it may all have been just a ruse. Because as Ynet reports, not only has Putin not turned his back on Assad, or Syria, but the Russian reinforcements are well on their way. Reinforcements for what? Why to fight the evil Islamic jihadists from ISIS of course, the same artificially created group of bogeyman that the US, Turkey, and Saudis are all all fighting. In fact, this may be the first world war in which everyone is "fighting" an opponent that everyone knows is a proxy for something else.
According to Ynet, Russian fighter pilots are expected to begin arriving in Syria in the coming days, and will fly their Russian air force fighter jets and attack helicopters against ISIS and rebel-aligned targets within the failing state.
And just like the US and Turkish air forces are supposedly in the region to "eradicate the ISIS threat", there can't be any possible complaints that Russia has also decided to take its fight to the jihadists - even if it is doing so from the territory of what the real goal of US and Turkish intervention is - Syria. After all, it is a free for all against ISIS, right?
From Ynet:


According to Western diplomats, a Russian expeditionary force has already arrived in Syria and set up camp in an Assad-controlled airbase. The base is said to be in area surrounding Damascus, and will serve, for all intents and purposes, as a Russian forward operating base.

In the coming weeks thousands of Russian military personnel are set to touch down in Syria, including advisors, instructors, logistics personnel, technical personnel, members of the aerial protection division, and the pilots who will operate the aircraft.
The Israeli outlet needless adds that while the current makeup of the Russian expeditionary force is still unknown, "there is no doubt that Russian pilots flying combat missions in Syrian skies will definitely change the existing dynamics in the Middle East."
Why certainly: because in one move Putin, who until this moment had been curiously non-commital over Syria's various internal and exteranl wars, just made the one move the puts everyone else in check: with Russian forces in Damascus implicitly supporting and guarding Assad, the western plan instantly falls apart.
It gets better: if what Ynet reports is accurate, Iran's brief tenure as Obama's BFF in the middle east is about to expire:


Western diplomatic sources recently reported that a series of negotiations had been held between the Russians and the Iranians, mainly focusing on ISIS and the threat it poses to the Assad regime. The infamous Iranian Quds Force commander Major General Qasem Soleimani recently visited Moscow in the framework of these talks. As a result the Russians and the Iranians reached a strategic decision: Make any effort necessary to preserve Assad's seat of power, so that Syria may act as a barrier, and prevent the spread of ISIS and Islamist backed militias into the former Soviet Islamic republics.
See: the red herring that is ISIS can be used just as effectively for defensive purposes as for offensive ones. And since the US can't possibly admit the whole situation is one made up farce, it is quite possible that the world will witness its first regional war when everyone is fighting a dummy, proxy enemy which doesn't really exist, when in reality everyone is fighting everyone else!
That said, we look forward to Obama explaining the American people how the US is collaborating with the one mid-east entity that is supporting not only Syria, but now is explicitly backing Putin as well.
It gets better: Ynet adds that "Western diplomatic sources have emphasized that the Obama administration is fully aware of the Russian intent to intervene directly in Syria, but has yet to issue any reaction... The Iranians and the Russians- with the US well aware- have begun the struggle to reequip the Syrian army, which has been left in tatters by the civil war. They intend not only to train Assad's army, but to also equip it. During the entire duration of the civil war, the Russians have consistently sent a weapons supply ship to the Russian held port of Tartus in Syria on a weekly basis. The ships would bring missiles, replacement parts, and different types of ammunition for the Syrian army."
Finally, it appears not only the US military-industrial complex is set to profit from the upcoming war: Russian dockbuilders will also be rewarded:


Arab media outlets have recently published reports that Syria and Russia were looking for an additional port on the Syrian coast, which will serve the Russians in their mission to hasten the pace of the Syrian rearmament.
If all of the above is correct, the situation in the middle-east is set to escalate very rapidly over the next few months, and is likely set to return to the face-off last seen in the summer of 2013 when the US and Russian navies were within earshot of each other, just off the coast of Syria, and only a last minute bungled intervention by Kerry avoided the escalation into all out war. Let's hope Kerry has it in him to make the same mistake twice.

(Exane) ARM Holding : Royalty rate increase is the main growth driver

Royalty rate increase is the main growth driver

No doubt about it, the smartphone market will be weaker than expected. However, higher royalty
rate per chip from migration to 64-Bit / Multicores / big.LITTLE is the main growth driver for ARM,
not unit volumes. The recent sell-off opens a great buying opportunity.

Cutting our smartphone market forecasts
Our Telecom Equipment team has updated its forecasts for the global smartphone market post
Gartner’s Q2 15 update. It now expects a 13% rise in smartphone volumes to 1.4bn units
(previously +15% to 1.48bn) and a modest 6% growth in 2016 to 1.48bn. This essentially translates
the impact of a weaker Chinese market but also a weaker US market in 2016 as lower operator
subsidies will depress the replacement rate.

Fine tuning our model: EPS cut by 4% on 2016 and 3% on 2017
We have cut our 2016–17 EPS to reflect the weaker smartphone market. Importantly, the biggest
hit to smartphone volumes will be at the low end (3G China), where royalties are 3–4x lower than
at the high end. We assume the high-end smartphone market will hold roughly flat this year and so
have made negligible changes at Apple and only minor cuts at Samsung.

Investment thesis unchanged
Despite fears on end-demand, namely in China, we reiterate our view that ARM’s revenue growth
will be driven essentially by 64-Bit migration in 2015–16 and by Octacore in 2016–17. Beyond that,
we see Networking as the most promising and substantial opportunity for ARM and expect it to
constitute the next source of growth. The stock is now trading at 26.3x 2016 EPS; a level not seen
since 2009. We view the sell-off as a great buying opportunity. We have cut our DCF-based TP by
4% to 1,300p and reiterate our Outperform rating.