(MS) Engie : 1st Take: Engie looking at controlling

What is new: According to la Lettre de l'Expansion (16/11/15), Engie's CEO
has asked financial advisors to look into a scenario that would allow Engie to
gain back control of Suez.

Engie currently owns 33.7% of Suez. The article says that Suez's activities
would fit well with Engie's strategy to focus on regulated markets and invest in
the energy transition, while selling thermal assets in the US. The companies
have not commented on this article – this corresponds to the policy of both
companies to never comment on press rumours.

On balance, we see a lack of obvious strategic rationale for such a deal. We
expect the focus at Engie to be more on streamlining its current portfolio
rather than extending it, and continue to believe that Suez could be a plausible
candidate for asset rotation (see our related Engie Insight note of Oct 13). The
announcement today by the Belgian Safety authority allowing the restart of
Doel 3 Tihange 2 helps de-risk the Engie equity story (1st Take: Restart of
Belgian reactors confirmed by safety authority). We can now focus on the
next important step: details on the new restructuring story in February,
including new cost cutting targets, more asset rotation and, possibly, more
return of cash to shareholders.

Our view: while we note the content of the article, the strategic
rationale mentioned for such a deal would be unclear to us, and so for 3
reasons.
1/ Water and Waste does not fit into the strategy of becoming a global
energy company: In our recent report on Engie dated 13/10/15, we
explained that Engie's strategy was to be a global energy company, focusing
on gas and electricity regulated assets, renewables, energy services, as well as
the gas value chain and power generation in growth geographies. It is not
obvious that Suez fits into this description, being a water and waste
management company (although a portion of its water activity is indeed
regulated). Energy production is only a small subset of the energy from waste
business.
2/ Potential synergies around joint marketing to industrial customers
are not obvious to us: SEV increasingly focuses on industrial clients (for
instance for Industrial Water treatment and Hazardous Waste treatment), and
these clients could also be interested in energy saving services. After all, this is
Veolia’s business model, combining Water, Waste and Energy Services. Yet we
remain unconvinced about the value derived from combining Energy with
Water and Waste – for proof, Engie has been able to make strong progress and
become the world leader in energy services that it is today without the help of SEV.

3/ Recent rebranding sets Suez apart from Engie: the rebranding was
aimed at aligning the old GDF Suez name to the group strategy focusing on
Energy. The new Suez corporate identity ensures that confusion with Engie is
now pretty much impossible. We view the rebranding of the 2 groups earlier
this year as an indication that the paths of the 2 companies have been
gradually moving in different directions.
•Why do we believe Suez could be a plausible candidate for asset
rotation, rather than a target for control? Suez is posting strong growth at
the bottom line (+13% EPS CAGR 2015-18e), but the SEV businesses of water
and waste management are not aligned with Engie’s ambition to become a
global leader in energy. We also note that Engie only has a 33.6% stake in SEV.
As a principle, Engie would rather own controlling stakes in its core businesses,
as is the case for all its energy holdings whether listed businesses (eg
Tractebel, Glow) or non listed fully consolidated entities (E&P division). We
note however that Engie CEO G Mestrallet has repeatedly said that Suez
remains core to Engie, with the latest example being during the 1Q15
conference call on 27/04/15. The 2 groups remain close, sharing selected
industrial projects together.
•A gradual path of reduction of Engie’s influence over Suez: since 2008,
Engie has demonstrated a gradual yet clear path to reduce its influence over
Suez, with the listing of Suez allowing Engie to reduce its economic stake from
100% to 34%. The full consolidation was maintained due to the shareholders’
pact. But its non–renewal in 2013 means that the entity is now only
consolidated as an associate.
•The valuation argument: given Suez's current level (trading at 19.7x PE16e)
relative to Engie (at 14.2x PE16e) a deal would be dilutive, even before
considering the level of premium that Engie would have to attach to an offer
for control.
On balance, we see a lack of obvious strategic rationale for such a deal
and continue to believe that Suez could be a plausible candidate for
asset rotation.
What form of asset rotation ? As we wrote recently, a disposal could be
structured via a sale to an industrial partner or a market placement. History
provides good examples, with the listing of Suez orchestrated by Engie in
2008, or the various conversation between Suez/Engie and other groups. Over
the past decade, VIE and GSZ/SEV have held talks with Vinci and Air Liquide,
respectively (although these talks were very brief and did not lead to any form
of agreement), latest evidence being in October 2012 for an aborted business
combination between the 2 competing companies (see our report dated
22/10/2012).

(JPM) Suez Env. : Potential Engie stake increase: a look at the rationale

Potential Engie stake increase: a look at the rationale and the numbers

SEV shares are up strongly today on speculation that Engie may be considering taking back control (from 33.5%
currently). Given Engie management has stated that SEV is non-core, this has come as a surprise: the stake was
widely seen until now as a candidate for disposal. In the absence of a denial from Engie (which has chosen not
to comment so far) we expect the speculation to sustain SEV shares at or above current levels, almost regardless
of valuation/fundamentals. A full takeover would be required under French law if Engie was to raise its stake
above 50% and given recent performance of SEV shares, this would not be immaterial from a leverage
perspective (we estimate +0.6x on ND/EBITDA if the deal was financed with debt). We expect Engie to
announce a substantial disposal programme at its CMD in Q2 2016, which could help free up capital for
reinvestment in focus areas (energy services, PPA generation and networks in growth markets). Buying out SEV
at a significant premium to the current price is unlikely to qualify as a priority for long term Engie shareholders,
and we see scope for disappointment if this was confirmed.

* Claims that Engie is looking at taking back control of SEV are surprising. La Lettre de l'Expansion
reported yesterday in a very brief article that Engie is looking to take back control of Suez Environnement,
which was partially spun off in 2009 as a pre-condition of the GDF/Suez merger. We see the source as
relatively credible and so far Engie has not formally denied the claim; as such we expect today’s share price
gains to be sustained and speculation to persist. That being said, the report comes as a real surprise – Engie
and Suez Environnement spent money and time splitting their operations and establishing separate brand
names; Engie management has publicly stated for a number of years that the SEV stake was non-core, as a
result this was widely seen as a disposal candidate. We would also note that Engie is accustomed to executing
complex M&A transactions; a leak on a transaction of such magnitude would also be quite surprising.

* Full takeover would be compulsory under French law. The French commercial code stipulates that a full
takeover is rendered compulsory if a company that owns between 30% and 50% of a listed entity increases its
stake by more than 1% over a period of 12 months (article 234-2). The Autorite des Marches Financiers
(AMF) may grant an exemption where a company that already owns between 30-50% increases its stake if it
intends to keep it as a long-term holding and doe not exceed the 50% threshold (article 234-5). As such, our
understanding is that Engie would not be able to increase its holding in SEV above 50% without launching a
full takeover offer.

* Running the numbers. Assuming Engie was to launch a full takeover offer for SEV funded with debt and
assuming a 20% premium to yesterday’s close (cash out €7.4bn), we estimate EPS accretion of 5-7% in 2016-
18E (based on a pre-tax cost of debt of 2.5%). The impact on leverage would be significant in our view, with
2016E ND/EBITDA increasing to 3.1x (Engie definition) versus 2.5x pre-acquisition which is also the
maximum leverage the company has long targeted. As such, should Engie decide to make a takeover for SEV
quickly (i.e. before significant disposals can be executed), we would not exclude a mixed offer (shares and
cash) or a partial rights issue to fund a cash offer, as was the case for International Power.

* We expect SEV shares to be sustained; on balance the read is negative read for Engie. If not denied, we
expect the speculation of a potential take over by parent Engie will sustain SEV shares at or above the current
level (almost regardless of fundamentals and valuation). That being said, the AMF may require a statement
from Engie at some point if the impact on SEV shares continues to be obvious. As for Engie, one could argue
the benefits of integrating SEV’s engineering business (Degremont), but we doubt investors will be won over
by the concept of returning to the early 2000s model of a “multi utility” offering. We believe investor interest
in Engie has been growing as the obvious remaining restructuring story among large European utilities,

(BofA-ML) European telecom : French Spectrum auction almost over - benign outcom

French Spectrum auction almost over – benign outcome

* Iliad armed with solid spectrum, benign outcome overall
For once, the result of the French 700MHz auction was more benign than expected, with
the price per block coming below our expectations, and more importantly no “nuclear”
scenario that would have been an Iliad without spectrum. Although a disciplined auction
made sense with both NUM-SFR and Bouygues downplaying the need for 700MHz
spectrum, the outcome was always uncertain. We don’t see direct short-term
implications for potential consolidation, with all players well equipped with low-band
spectrum. However, the “no-talk” period on spectrum ends, and both NUM-SFR and
Orange continue to see rationale for consolidation talks to re-open.

* ARCEP confirms end of French 700MHz auctions
• Auction over after two days and 10 rounds. Total cost: €2.8bn (12% above reserve
price of €2.5bn).
• Orange and Iliad granted with 2 blocks for €932m each, SFR and Bouygues got 1
block for €466m each.
• Secondary auction to determine block allocation by Nov 19th, limited cash outlays
expected
• Coverage obligations (France metro): 98% pop 17 Jan 2017, 99.6% T+15 years.
Coverage obligations in each “department”: 90% pop by 17 Jan 2027, 95% T+15
years. Coverage obligations in less dense areas: 50% 17 Jan 2011, 92% 2027,
97.7% T+15 years
• Payment terms: 4 yearly payments (25% each of total amount), first payment at
attribution of spectrum, and 12 month intervals. 1% of revenues, 20 year period


* Stock implications
• Orange (Buy): starting to build a differentiated spectrum portfolio versus SFR and
Bouygues Tel, with more spectrum in both 700MHz and 2.6GHz. We remain
constructive on Buy-rated Orange on revenue recovery, efficiency and valuation
support
• Iliad (Buy): the auction outcome is a clear positive for Buy-rated Iliad, avoiding a
potential squeeze by competitors. Q3 were solid and pave the way for further
revenue and EBITDA delivery, but higher capex drain mid-term FCF generation
• Bouygues (Neutral): spectrum position remains very solid post auction, with the
same holding as NUM-SFR despite a much smaller subs base, and a total of 25% of
spectrum holding in the market vs a 14% market share.
• NUM (Neutral): we were not expecting an aggressive bidding from NUM-SFR post
the increase in leverage to fund the Vivendi stake payment. NUM-SFR will have to
continue to invest to match the quality gap with leaders, and appears open to
relaunch consolidation discussions in the medium term. We see long term value on
delivery, but revenue improvement required.

(CS) Italian Luxury - Tod's Upgraded to Neutral from Underperform

* Downside risk becoming more limited
* We are upgrading Tod's Group to Neutral (from Underperform)
The sentiment on the stock among both sell-side and buy-side analysts remains overly negative. We now struggle to see more downside risk to the shares after being the second worst performer after Prada in our luxury universe in
the past two years.

* Tod's Group is potentially reaching trough earnings. 
Consensus EPS has come down by 50% in the past two years, but we have not seen any meaningful cut to forecasts for nearly a year. We now feel confident about current market expectations for 2016, factoring in a modest rebound in
margin from the historically low level of 2015. Sales growth should technically improve as the group starts lapping two years of easy comps in 4Q15. We forecast +2% LFL in 2016 after -5% in 2015e and -7% in 2014.

* A long-awaited revamp of the handbags offering. 
Tod's has performed well below peers in handbags in the past three years. We attribute this to the lack of
real newness until the recent launches of the S/S'15 and A/W'15 seasons. This includes the Wave bag launched in 4Q which seems to be faring particularly well and was partly responsible for the LFL improvement at the beginning of 4Q, according to management. We model positive growth in handbags for Tod's in 2016, which should be accretive to gross margins.

* Valuation remains too rich to be more constructive. 
Tod's Group is trading at 22x 2016e P/E, representing a 25% premium to our luxury universe. Earnings visibility may have improved, but we deem it too early to see earnings upgrades. In addition, we do not forecast earnings growth to
be any better than our sector average and ROIC has yet to recover.

* We are retaining our Outperform rating on Salvatore Ferragamo. 
It is a high-beta stock in our universe and has therefore been heavily penalized by disappointing sector trends in 3Q. Earnings visibility may not be as good as before, but the relative earnings momentum is still positive, with consensus EPS down 5% in the past 12 months against 10% for our universe overall. We believe the recent share price correction has been overdone with the stock de-rating to 19x 2016e P/E on our numbers, well below its historical average and almost on par with its peer group average.

>>> What to look at today - 18th of November 2015

Dow+0.04% S&P-0.11% Nasdaq+0.03% Russell-0.24% VIX : 18.84 ( +3.75%)
US Market closed near its flat line. European Terrorists threats weighted on the market in the afternoon. Six sectors ended the day with losses while health care (+0.4%) ended in the lead thanks to daylong strength in biotechnology, IBB +1.3%, energy (-1.1%) underperformed notably, crude oil lost 2.4%, ending the pit session at $40.74/bbl, Utilities -1.8%, Consumer Staples Falt with WMT+3.5% on earnings, HD+4.4%. DKS-9.4% after missing and lower guidance, UA & LULU lower too. Volume were above average with more than 1bil shares traded. US After Hours JACK +3.7%, VIPS +2%, RADA -8.9%, SQM -2.1%, MCUR -1.9%, CTXS -1.9% following earnings/guidance. Asian Market trading around the flat line, digesting new terrors threats in Europe...Xi added China economy is still in reasonable range and dealing well with temporary headwinds. China property prices also showed more signs of recovery. Across all 70 top cities surveyed, y/y 0.1% growth was the first in 14 months after falling 0.9% in Sept. PBoC has resumed weakening Yuan midpoint fix after taking a pause yesterday, presumably on expectation of eventual strength as the currency is absorbed into the IMF SDR. Ahead of tomorrow's BOJ policy decision, one survey was unanimous in expectation that no further stimulus would be announced.

Nikkei +0.09% Hang Seng -0.08% Shanghai -0.23%

Eur$ 1.0646 JPY 123.23 CNY 6.3846 GBP 1.5198 CHF 1.0154 RUB $65.2082 WTI $41.02(+0.86%)

S&P -0.07% EuroStoxx -0.58% Da -0.48% SMI -0.34%

Macro :
- France’s Macron Says Security Measures Won’t Slow Economy: AFP
- Hedge Fund With 138% Gain Says China Shorts Easier to Spot
- Gross Partner ‘Worried’ About Size, Pace of Fed Rate Rises
- SNB Still Has Currency Firepower to Fight ECB Policy Fallout (1)

Keep an eye on :
- ABI BB : AB InBev Director de Spoelberch Sells EU1.72m of Brewer’s Stock
- AI FP : Air Liquide to Buy Airgas for $143/Share in Cash, Airgas Poison Pill Threshold Cut to 10% Vs 15%
- AI FP : Air Products Shuns Packaged Gas as Rival Puts Airgas in Play: BI
- AKER NO : Aker 3Q NAV NOK18.9b; Saw Detnor, Akastor Write Downs in 3Q
- BARC LN : Barclays Said Facing at Least $100m Fine on Forex From U.S.: FT
- BLT LN : BHP Billiton May Need to Cut Div. If Credit Rtg at Risk: UBS
- BINCK NA : BinckBank Plans New Growth Strategy, Aims to Expand Services
- GYC GY : Grand City 3Q Net Attributable More Than Doubles
- EGPW IM : Enel to Absorb, Delist Enel Green; Issue New Shrs to EGP Holders
- EGP PL : Mota-Engil Africa Extends Acceptance Period to Buy Own Shares
- ORA FP : Orange, Iliad Won 2 Blocks Each in Mobile Auction: Regulator
- REP SM : Repsol Says Bolivia Project Gas Output Hits 19m Cubic Meters/Day
- SEV FP : Engie Denies Hiring Banks Following Reports of Suez Control
- SYNN VX : Ahead of tomorrow's BOJ policy decision, one survey was unanimous in expectation that no further stimulus would be announced.
- UC IM : UniCredit Agreed to Sell 3.2% Bank of Italy Stake: Ansa
- VOW3 GY : German Justice Min. Expects VW to Treat Customers Equally: Funke

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 18th of November 20

>>> Up
*ANTOFAGASTA RAISED TO NEUTRAL VS SELL AT GOLDMAN
*BRENNTAG RAISED TO BUY AT KEPLER CHEUVREUX
*KAZ MINERALS RAISED TO NEUTRAL VS SELL AT GOLDMAN
*SEMPERIT RAISED TO BUY VS HOLD AT DEUTSCHE BANK
*TOD'S RAISED TO NEUTRAL VS UNDERPERFORM AT CREDIT SUISSE

>>> Down
*CAPITAL STAGE CUT TO NEUTRAL VS OUTPERFORM AT MACQUARIE
*ESURE CUT TO HOLD VS BUY AT PEEL HUNT
*ING CUT TO REDUCE VS HOLD AT KEPLER CHEUVREUX

>>> PT Change


>>> Initiation
*ATALAYA MINING RATED NEW BUY AT PEEL HUNT, PT 150P
*ESSENTRA RATED NEW BUY AT CITI; PT 900P
*SCHAEFFLER RATED NEW BUY AT HSBC, PT EU18
*SCHAEFFLER RATED NEW NEUTRAL AT CITI; PT EU13.5
*SCHAEFFLER RATED NEW BUY AT DEUTSCHE BANK; PT EU16

>>> Call
>> Stock
*HUNTING PLC ADDED TO CONVICTION LIST AT GOLDMAN, REMAINS BUY

>>> US After Hours Summary: JACK +3.7%, VIPS +2%, RADA -8.9%, SQ


After Hours Summary: JACK +3.7%, VIPS +2%, RADA -8.9%, SQM -2.1%, MCUR -1.9%, CTXS -1.9% following earnings/guidance

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings: JACK +3.7%, VIPS +2%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: MIFI +11.8% (announced that Wells Fargo Bank has increased the Company's five-year senior secured revolving credit facility to $48 million), NSC +6.4% (Canadian Pacific (CP) proposed to acquire the company in cash and stock at a 'sizeable premium'), UVE +6.1% (co issued a statement 'correct misleading allegations and misinformation presented by Lakewood Capital'), COMM +5.2% (mentioned positively by Maverick Capital's Lee Ainslie at Robin Hood conference), DEPO +4.3% (acquired the rights to Cebranopadol from Grünenthal GmbH), RDEN +3.6% (co's President of Global Fragrances, Joel B. Ronkin, resigned to accept a position as CEO of a privately-held personal care organization), AXLL -1.7% (appointed Timothy Mann as CEO)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings: RADA -8.9%, SQM -2.1%, MCUR -1.9%, CTXS -1.9%, AMCN -0.8%, GBDC -0.5%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: OME -3.3% (Wynnefield filed an amended 13D disclosing letter sent as follow up to several earlier communications detailing concerns and doubts related to the credibility of the 'purported strategic review process'), WMGI -0.9% (announced a secondary offering of 4.5 mln shares by an affiliate of Warburg Pincus)

>>> Asian Update

Asian Mid-session Update: China property prices grow for the first time in over a year; Terror vigilance still high as 2 flights to Paris diverted

***Economic Data***
- (AU) AUSTRALIA Q3 WAGE PRICE INDEX Q/Q: 0.6% V 0.6%E; Y/Y: 2.3% (matches 17-year lows) V 2.3%E
- (AU) AUSTRALIA OCT WESTPAC LEADING INDEX M/M: +0.1% V +0.1% PRIOR
- (AU) Australia Sept Conference Board Leading index m/m: -0.1% v -0.4% prior

***Index Snapshot (as of 02:30 GMT)***
- Nikkei225 +0.6%, S&P/ASX +0.4%, Kospi +0.1%, Shanghai Composite +0.2%, Hang Seng +0.1%, Dec S&P500 flat at 2,048

***Commodities/Fixed Income***
- Dec gold -0.3% at $1,065/oz, Jan crude oil +0.8% at $42.04/brl, Dec copper -1.4% at $2.07/lb
- (US) API Petroleum Inventories: Crude: -0.48M v +6.3M prior; First draw in 6 weeks
- (CN) China National Coal Association (CNCA): China Jan-Oct coal consumption 3.2B tonnes, -4.7% y/y - China Daily
- (CN) China Iron and Steel Association (CISA) official: Steel production in 2016 may fall to 783M tons from estimated 806M in 2015 - financial press

- USD/CNY: (CN) PBoC sets yuan mid point at 6.3796 v 6.3724 prior; Weakest Yuan setting since Aug 31st
- (CN) China MoF sells 7-yr bonds at 3.126%
- (JP) BOJ offers to buy ¥400B in 1-3yr JGBs, ¥400B in 3-5yr JGBs, ¥400B in 5-10yr JGBs
- (AU) Australia MoF (AOFM) sells A$800M in 4.25% 2026 Bonds; avg yield: 2.97%; bid-to-cover: 3.06x

***Market Focal Points/FX***
- Asian markets were modestly higher in the morning session, but mild optimism has given way to some caution in afternoon hours. The aftermath of the Paris terror attacks remains embedded in the most immediate market sentiment, as seen in the US hours when police had reportedly been called in about explosives at the Hanover soccer stadium in Germany. In the Asian hours, there were reports that two separate Air France flights to Paris - one from LA and one from Washington - have been diverted to other airports. Both flights landed safe and no passengers were harmed. In the mean time, France air force continues to conduct raids on an Isis in Syria, this time with assistance from Russia.

- China Pres Xi spoke at the APEC summit in the Philippines, noting continued uncertainty and instability in global economy despite some signs of sustained recovery. Xi added China economy is still in reasonable range and dealing well with temporary headwinds. China property prices also showed more signs of recovery. Across all 70 top cities surveyed, y/y 0.1% growth was the first in 14 months after falling 0.9% in Sept. M/M growth of 0.1% was slower than 0.2% prior but still marked the 6th month of gains. PBoC has resumed weakening Yuan midpoint fix after taking a pause yesterday, presumably on expectation of eventual strength as the currency is absorbed into the IMF SDR.

- Economic data have been largely contained to Australia, where the most notable datapoint was the Q3 Wage Prices. Wage inflation remains soft - a 17-year low in y/y rate - and figures to be considered by the RBA in the context of strong job creation reported last week. Ahead of tomorrow's BOJ policy decision, one survey was unanimous in expectation that no further stimulus would be announced. AUD/USD was down about 25pips at 0.7090 late in the day, while USD/JPY was down about 20pips from the highs below 123.30.

***Equities***
US equities / ADRs:
- NSC: CP confirms recommends combination; sends letter of proposal; +2.5% afterhours
- COMM: Maverick capital makes positive comments (already holds stake) at Robin Hood conference; +2.1% afterhours
- JACK: Reports Q4 $0.65 (adj) v $0.65e, R$354M v $358Me; +4.2% afterhours
- VIPS: Reports Q3 $0.12 v $0.12e, R$1.36B v $1.41Be; +3.2% afterhours
- CTXS: Raises FY16 $4.40-4.50 v $3.88e (prior $3.85-3.90); Cuts Rev +1-2% y/y (implies $3.13-3.16B v $3.25Be) (prior $3.24-3.25B); Gives initial results of its operations review, to layoff 1.0k positions; -1.8% afterhours

Notable movers by sector:
- Consumer discretionary: Car Inc 699.HK -1.1% (9-month result); Bosideng International Holdings 3998.HK -1.4% (guidance); Odakyu Electric Railway Co 9007.JP +1.9% (FY15/16 guidance)
- Financials: CITIC Securities 6030.HK +4.3% (possible restructure speculation); China CITIC Bank 998.HK +1.2% (to set up bank with Baidu)
- Industrials: Orica ORI.AU +3.2% (FY15 prelim result)
- Technology: Kingsoft Corp 3888.HK +3.2% (Q3 result)
- Materials: Cudeco CDU.AU -25.0% (impairment); BHP BHP.AU -2.5%, Fortescue FMG.AU -2.9% (Iron ore declines)
- Utilities: DUET Group DUE.AU +0.6% (raises FY16 dividend guidance)

(GS) Strategy Espressos - Part 1 & 2

In Strategy Matters: Momentum, rotation and value traps (October 15, 2015) we discussed the prospects for changes in sector leadership in the market. At that time, there had been a rapid and powerful rotation within several equity markets, resulting in a reversal of the trends that had been dominant throughout most of the year; in particular, EM and commodity-exposed stocks bounced strongly. This reversal of the previous performance led to much pain for many investors and raised questions about the sustainability of these moves.

Our main messages were that:

1.    While the momentum reversal in late September and early October had been sharp, it was not unprecedented. Since 2004, there have been eight previous momentum rotations in the market that were similar in magnitude to the one that started at the end of September. Many were short lived and we expected this one to be too.

2.    We looked at value traps — long-run secular underperformers — and found that many enjoyed strong bounces in relative performance while still in a secular downtrend. Most such sectors historically experienced some bottoming of fundamental return drivers (such as ROE) before they started to recover in any sustainable way.

3.    We argued that the rally in secular underperformers (commodities and capex plays in particular) at the start of October was more due to positioning than fundamentals. We expected the rotation to be short-lived and for the previous pattern of outperformance by more domestic, consumer-facing stocks to resume before long with renewed weakness in commodity- and industrial-capex-related sectors.

 

Much has changed in the past month and, based on our measures of momentum, the leadership within the European equity market has once again reversed.

The September/October market reversal has reversed strongly
EU Momentum Long/Short (GSRPEMEP Index), Jan-15 = 100

Source: Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.

 

One important driver of the September/October rotation was the delayed expectations of a rise in US interest rates following the September 'dovish' Fed meeting. Coinciding with a bounce in commodity markets, this helped to trigger a rally in many EM FX cross rates as well as equities. But, with the more recent renewed confidence in an imminent rate 'lift off' in the US, coupled with yet further weakness in commodity markets, the previously weaker sectors have once again suffered poor performance.

 

Previously weaker sectors have once again suffered poor performance
Market-relative price performance of European sectors, year to Sept. 28 and Oct. 9 to present

Source: Datastream, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.

 

To examine rotations, we used the momentum basket GSRPEMEP (European Momentum Long/Short, price return/price return). This index is constructed using European stocks (approx. the largest 80% by market cap in Europe). The prior 11 months of price performance, one month ago, is standardised across regions/sectors and adjusted for volatility to provide a z-score (momentum factor) that is comparable across all stocks. The target portfolio goes long the top 20% of z-scores for the long leg, and the bottom 20% for the short leg. To this target portfolio, tradability constraints are applied (liquidity, turnover, sector/region weight) to generate the long and short baskets (GSRPEMEL/GSRPEMES=GSRPEMEP). It is rebalanced monthly.

Looking at this index of momentum over a longer period reveals that the experiences at the start of October were by no means unique. We have found at least eight previous similar episodes (see below).

 

The most recent downward shift in momentum was not extraordinary…
Left: EU Momentum Long/Short (GSRPEMEP Index), Log scale and Sep-04 = 100; Right: Examining the shifts in momentum

Source: Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.

 

 

We found that the average had generated a shift of -15% in the momentum index. Of course, they were not all equivalent in length, thus when we considered the annualised shift in performance, the average was 84%.

 

 

The reversal of the reversal!

The reversals from these historical rotations has varied quite a bit. The speed depends to some degree on precisely which low we take as a measurement point. The table below is based on the low dates in the table above, but often a sharp reversal of momentum is followed by a sideways move for a while before a change in momentum asserts itself, meaning historical reversals of momentum may not have happened as quickly as the one we have just experienced. Nevertheless, the general pattern we have seen recently, with a reversal of the momentum unwind, is not unprecedented in terms of direction. That is to say, most momentum unwinds, such as the one that we experienced in October, do not last long.

 

…as is the recent reversal of the reversal
Left: EU Momentum Long/Short (GSRPEMEP Index), Log scale and Sep-04 = 100; Right: Examining the shifts in momentum

Source: Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.

 

Animportant feature of the market that is worthy of note is that, while previous leadership in the market has reinforced itself, the correlation of stock performance across the market has come down. Sector leadership has largely reverted to the pattern that prevailed before October, but stock performance has become less correlated. This is partly a reflection of the earnings season and more idiosyncratic news flow, but it is also probably a function of a less clear market direction.

 

The strong momentum trend has re-asserted itself, but stock correlations are now falling
STOXX Europe 600 1m and 12m pairwise correlations

Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research.

 

Where do we go from here?

 

In our view,many of the themes that we have looked at this year remain very much relevant. The domestic economies in Europe and the US are holding up well, and consumption is being supported by resilient labour markets. At the same time, the weakness in EM industrial end demand, coupled with low commodity prices and decreasing commodity capex, are serving as important and continued headwinds for many industrial stocks.

In general, we think EM markets are likely to remain weak for two key reasons:

 

1.    While US interest rate rises are now expected in December, the forwards imply a slower rise than we think is likely and the market-implied gap between our baseline projections and forwards grows over time from around 40bp at end-2016 to around 80-90bp at end-2017. Our US economics team’s modal forecast calls for 100bp of cumulative hikes during 2016 (Fed Funds would end the year at 1.4%) and a further 100bp of tightening during 2017 (at the end of which Fed Funds would stand at 2.4%). One of main reasons why we expect a higher trajectory for policy rates is that, with the US economy expected to continue to expand faster than its 1.75% potential rate of growth, pressures on wages and core inflation will build, but the market does not appear to be pricing this. Indeed, core US CPI inflation is already trailing just below 2%. Market prices imply that US policy rates will, at best, hover close to zero in real terms over the coming three years. If these expectations change, it may put more downward pressure on EM economies and markets.

2.    EM imbalances have started to improve in many cases, owing to weak domestic demand and significant exchange rate adjustment. However, EM assets tend to bottom in the year before the end of the deleveraging cycle, suggesting that we could continue to see weakness at least well into 2016. Our economists note that credit gaps have already begun to shrink in Korea, Thailand and the CE-3 but gaps remain wide and bank earnings are still outsized in China, Brazil, Chile, Malaysia and Indonesia (for details, see: Emerging Markets Analyst: 15/18 - The EM Credit Cycle Part 2: Varying paths of deleveraging, November 13, 2015).

 

Furthermore, we see more downward pressure on commodity markets, particularly in metals (for details, see: Metal Detector: Copper poised to move even lower November 11, 2015).


For these reasons,
we continue to prefer more domestic-demand-exposed sectors and services, and remain negative on the capex cycle and areas exposed to this, particularly in EM.

 

 

 

 

http://t.sidekickopen01.com/e1t/o/5/f18dQhb0S7ks8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9gXrN7sKj6v5dlQxW4XyQDd4WrNJRW5wf5Jx3LvrVvW85mN421k1H6H0?si=5651968104595456&pi=ec412dbe-29b7-4501-8466-805d319a6525

>>> US Close Dow+0.04% S&P-0.11% Nasdaq+0.03% Russell-0.24%

Closing Market Summary: S&P 500 Rejected By 200-Day Moving Average

The stock market finished the day on a flat note after enjoying an opening rally that briefly placed the S&P 500 (-0.1%) above its 200-day moving average (2,064). The benchmark index was up around 0.7% during late morning action, but steady afternoon selling ensured a lower finish.

The second-half retreat accelerated after police officials in Hanover, Germany confirmed that a credible bomb threat forced the cancellation of a soccer match between Germany and the Netherlands. Press reports suggested that an emergency vehicle loaded with explosives was found at the soccer stadium, but this was refuted by the German Interior Minister just before the market closed for the day.

Treasuries notched their highs in reaction to the news, but to be fair, they spent the day in a steady climb off their lows that were set around 10:30 ET. The 10-yr note ended the day with a modest gain, pressuring its yield two basis points to 2.26% after testing the 2.31% level during morning action.

Six sectors ended the day with losses while health care (+0.4%) ended in the lead thanks to daylong strength in biotechnology. To that point, the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB 329.14, +4.25) gained 1.3%, helping keep the Nasdaq Composite ahead of the broader market. However, that was a small victory considering the Nasdaq returned to its flat line as large cap tech sector (unch) components struggled, overshadowing a good showing from the chipmaker space where the PHLX Semiconductor Index gained 0.6%.

Similar to technology, most cyclical sectors ended the day with modest losses while energy (-1.1%) underperformed notably. The growth-sensitive sector struggled from the start after surging more than 3.0% on Monday. As for today, the sector retreated while crude oil lost 2.4%, ending the pit session at $40.74/bbl.

Although the energy sector posted a notable loss, the group still ended ahead of the utilities sector, which lagged throughout the day, settling lower by 1.8%. Elsewhere among countercyclical groups, the consumer staples sector ended flat, masking a 3.5% spike in the shares of Wal-Mart (WMT 59.92, +2.05) after the retail giant reported a one-cent beat. Meanwhile, another retailer—Home Depot (HD 126.18, +5.34)—also had a solid showing, spiking 4.4%, in reaction to better than expected results, but the consumer discretionary sector was limited to a slim gain of 0.2%.

In other earnings of note, Dick's Sporting Goods (DKS 36.96, -3.85) tumbled 9.4% after missing estimates and lowering its guidance. The report cast a pall over apparel retailers with the likes of Under Armour (UA 84.99, -5.01), Finish Line (FINL 15.52, -0.40), and Lululemon (LULU 44.09, -1.15) falling between 2.5% and 5.6%.

Today's session generated above-average activity with more than a billion shares changing hands at the NYSE floor.

Economic data included CPI, Industrial Production, and NAHB Housing Market Index:

  • The October Consumer Price Index was right in-line with expectations. Both total CPI and core CPI, which excludes food and energy, increased 0.2%.
    • Total CPI is up 0.2% year-over-year on an unadjusted basis while core CPI is up 1.9%, which is steady with the year-over-year change seen in September
  • October Industrial Production declined 0.2% on top of an unrevised 0.2% decline in September while the consensus estimate called for a 0.1% increase
    • Total industry Production is up 0.3% year-over-year
    • The October weakness was driven entirely by the mining and utilities groups, which saw output decline 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively, while manufacturing output increased 0.4%, which was the biggest gain since a 1.0% jump in July and the first increase in the last three months
  • The NAHB Housing Market Index for November fell to 62 from an upwardly revised 65 (from 64) while the consensus expected the reading to come in at 64.5

Tomorrow, the weekly MBA Mortgage Index will be released at 7:00 ET while October Housing Starts (consensus 1.173 million) and Building Permits (consensus 1.137 million) will be reported at 8:30 ET. Also of note, the Federal Reserve will release the minutes from its October meeting at 14:00 ET.

  • Nasdaq Composite +5.3% YTD
  • S&P 500 -0.4% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average -1.9% YTD
  • Russell 2000 -4.2% YTD