>>> Opera Software could be takeover target for Qihoo - Dagens Naeringsliv, Fina

Opera Software could be takeover target for Qihoo - Dagens Naeringsliv, Finansavisen

Opera Software, the listed Norwegian software company, is rumoured to be a takeover target for Chinese mobile and online security solutions provider, Qihoo, according to Dagens Naeringsliv.

The Norwegian business daily reported that Opera saw its share rise by 6% within half an hour on Friday morning. A Norwegian newswire report wrote in conjunction to the share price increase that the Norwegian broker Arctic Securities had informed its clients that Opera has attracted the takeover interest of Qihoo, after which trading of the Opera share was halted just minutes later. The paper reported that Opera was contacted by the Oslo stock exchange but the trading halt was still in place awaiting an announcement from the company when the exchange closed on Friday afternoon.

The paper reported that Opera announced in August that it had seen takeover interest from several companies.

The item cited Opera's Founder and ex-shareholder, Jon von Tetzchner, who said he knew nothing about a possible sale of the company but he commented that he was surprised a sale has taken as long as it has. He added that Opera has been up for sale ever since he left the company.

The paper also cited an Opera spokesperson who declined to comment on von Tetzchener's comments or what it is going on with Opera.

The original article appeared in print, Page 4.

Meanwhile, Finansavisen cited another Opera spokesperson who said that various rumours have been circulating throughout the autumn and no announcements will be made until there is something definite to announce.

A Danske Bank analyst told the business daily that he believes it is 75% likely that Opera's Consumer and licencing division will be sold. He pointed out that Qihoo could be interested due to the fact that 50m of Opera's 350m users are in India, 20m are in Russia and 10m are in China. He also speculated that Qihoo may be interested in integrating its search engine in Opera's browser.
Dagens Naeringsliv, Finansavisen

(GS) *EUROPE OIL SERVICES SECTOR RAISED TO NEUTRAL AT GOLDMAN

*AKER SOLUTIONS CUT TO SELL VS NEUTRAL AT GOLDMAN
*GIVAUDAN CUT TO NEUTRAL VS BUY AT GOLDMAN
*ORION OYJ RAISED TO NEUTRAL VS SELL AT GOLDMAN
*PETROFAC CUT TO NEUTRAL VS BUY AT GOLDMAN
*TECHNIP RAISED TO BUY VS NEUTRAL AT GOLDMAN
*TENARIS RAISED TO BUY VS NEUTRAL AT GOLDMAN
*WOOD GROUP CUT TO SELL, ADDED TO CONVICTION SELL LIST: GOLDMAN

WSJ : Thailand’s TCC Group to Buy Groupe Casino’s Stake in Big C


Thailand’s TCC Group to Buy Groupe Casino’s Stake in Big C
 
TCC to pay €3.1 billion for Casino’s 59% stake in hypermarket

Groupe Casino SA has agreed to sell its stake in Thai hypermarket operator Big C Supercenter PLC for $3.46 billion (€3.1 billion) to a Thai billionaire, according to people familiar with the matter, marking a major step in the French grocer’s plans to cut its debt.

Thai tycoon Charoen Sirivadhanabhakdi’s holding company, TCC Group, will buy Casino’s 58.6% stake in Big C Thailand for 252.88 baht a share ($7.10), these people said. They added that an agreement between the two could be announced before the market opens in Asia on Monday morning.

The sale is a key step in Casino’s attempts to reduce its debt pile. The retailer launched a €4 billion deleveraging plan in 2016 which includes selling its stake in the Thai supermarket as well as Vietnam retail assets. Ratings agency Standard & Poor’s in January put the French retailer’s debt on “negative watch” for a possible downgrade to junk status, citing concerns over weakness in Brazil and the retailer’s high debt pile.

The sale, which is expected to complete on March 31, will allow Casino to hit 80% of its €4 billion deleveraging target, the people said.

Casino makes about 40% of its sales in Latin America, where a prolonged recession in Brazil has led to falling sales and declining profitability. Management remains bullish on Brazil, but the slowdown has made it more difficult for Casino to support the same level.

In December, the grocer disclosed plans to sell its Vietnamese retail operation and some of its real-estate holdings in Colombia—sales of which are ongoing.

In the process of selling its Vietnam unit, Casino received a number of expressions of interest for its larger Thai unit and decided to sell that asset as well.

For Mr. Charoen, the deal boosts his retail presence in Thailand. He already owns a listed consumer products company called Berli Jucker PCL, which has interests from trading to packaging and retail. Last month, Mr. Charoen’s TCC Group closed a €655 million acquisition of Metro Group’s cash & carry wholesale business in Vietnam.

In recent years, deal hungry Thai tycoons like Mr. Charoen, the son of an ethnic Chinese street vendor in Bangkok, have been among the biggest spenders in the region.

Mr. Charoen started a small distillery with partners after dropping out of school and successfully bid for government liquor concessions in Thailand. Since then, he has expanded his business to include wide-ranging interests from real estate to finance and agriculture. He became a household name in 2013 when he bought a controlling stake in Singapore-listed conglomerate Fraser & Neave that valued the firm at $11 billion.

Casino entered the Thai market in 1999 when it acquired a stake in Big C, before adding rival Carrefour SA’s Thai operations in early 2011. Big C is now Thailand’s second-largest hypermarket operator after Tesco PLC’s Thai unit.

As of September last year, Big C and its subsidiaries operated 697 stores in Thailand. The company posted net profit of $38 million for the third quarter ended in September, down 14.5% over the same period last year.

(MS) Global Reflections

Feels like each day we’re headed a little further down the rabbit hole. What started as markets experiencing growth scare related turbulence seems to have now turned into a full on nose-dive as markets now look to be discounting a recession. Manufacturing weakness has been known as are the struggles within industrials, commodities, and materials but this week the other shoe dropped with US Services signaling it may be headed in the same downward direction evidenced by the non-manufacturing ISM falling to a two-year low. In fact, this week was marred with red flags being raised across the globe; European banks earnings have been mostly dismal, growth dependent stocks have drastically lowered outlooks, US construction spending was weak despite the warmest December on record, and Asian PMIs continued to paint a bleak picture, and Chinese consumer income confidence fell to a historically low reading. Furthermore, even the “love my stocks, hate the market” mentality that most investors have clung to through these treacherous markets now seems to slipping as indicated by our PB data which saw this week only the third day in five years that both longs were sold and shorts covered to the magnitude seen on our desk. Amid the broader downturn of commodities, markets, and positioning which have culminated in a type of “Wall Street Recession”, the more pertinent question I believe is whether or not this weakness will manifest itself into a “Main Street Recession”.
The bears have made it clear; there are plenty of signs pointing to recession above and beyond the aforementioned ones. At the micro level for instance, several companies sent unsettling messages; American Electric Power(AEP) & Southern (SO) both reported a significant decline in industrial demand, consumer names Kohl’s (KSS), Decker Outdoors (DECK), Hanesbrands (HBI), & Ralph Lauren (RL) all reported weakness and lowered guidance, and Linkedin (LNKD) and Tableau’s (DATA) lowered guidance’s also drummed up concerns given that weakness in their long-tailed sales contracts may suggest that SMEs are pulling back on spending more broadly. The yield curve has also flattened and given that one of the most consistent and well-followed indicators of oncoming recession happen to be an inverted yield curve, this is another red flag. It last inverted in late 2006 and correctly signaled the oncoming recession in 2008/09. Severalother key market metrics — BBB and high-yield bond spreads, the S&P 500’s Schiller P/E, and equity volatility — are currently at levels typically seen in recessions as well . This week has also seen several unusual dislocations which have caused much consternation. The Wash Rinse Repeat market of Oil, Commodities, Currencies, Credit, and Equities, once again was in a jam as we saw a weaker dollar and lower oil as well as separately seeing markets roll right over despite receiving a dovish message from Fed President Dudley midweek. While the list looks to be mounting, recession is still a debate and by no means a foregone conclusion; our US Economist Ellen Zentner still only gives it a 20% probability. However, in the spirit of reminding investors that any given point in the cycle opportunities still exist, our US Research team has put together a list of stock ideas if a downturn does occur. The list, “Names to Own / Avoid in a Recession”, includes names to own such as Acceleron (XLRN), Amgen (AMGN), Chubb (CB), Danaher (DHR), Kraft Heinz (KHC), McDonalds (MCD), and Verisk (VRSK) as well as names to avoid like American Airlines (AAL), Bloomin’ Brands (BLMN), Coach (COH), GoPro (GPRO), Outfront Media (OUT), Sprint (S), and Time (TIME). Please ask for the report.
Despite all of the doom and gloom being presented, there is potentially a silver lining for markets. For instance, while the headline number came in below expectations at 151k, the NFP report was otherwise quite positive. The unemployment rate fell by a tenth to 4.9%, wage growth expanded by 2.5, and participation was also higher than expected.We also saw signs of easing credit in the mortgage space, auto sales rising 2% in January after pulling back 5% in December, and oil even ended on the right side of the $30 mark , albeit overall being down on the week. Moreover and most importantly, I am firmly focused on earnings as I believe seeing some sort of growth will be key to sustaining and holding up the markets. Admittedly, the bar for earnings is lower so while beats are less impressive, if we can still get to anywhere between $120-125 of EPS implying even a slight level of growth I believe that will help instill confidence for many. One of the brightest signs of growth from earnings this week was surprisingly in the industrials sector. Broadly, 4Q15 EE/MI sales were actually in-line with expectations or better, tonnage growth at industrial-exposed LTLs ArcBest (ARCB) and Old Dominion Freight (ODFL) inflected higher in January, and Hubbell (HUBB), Fastenal (FAST), WW Grainger (GWW), and Emerson (EMR) all pointed to an improvement in January trends. Given that this sector has been one of the most pointed to by bears as evidence of a recession these recent data points should certainly raise the question of whether trends are reversing. Finally, ammunition of Central Banks has been a topic I have frequently debated and with Central Banks sending the message that they are willing to be accommodative and in some cases, “do whatever it takes”, I can’t help but feel that markets are implicitly supported by a policy floor. For those looking for opportunities which are best capable of navigating the challenged environment, a good list to start with is that of companies with high quality franchises including Amazon (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), Gilead Sciences (GILD), Google (GOOGL), Bank of America (BAC), Qualcomm (QCOM), Starbucks (SBUX) and XL Group PLC (XL). Unfortunately, many of these stocks have been beaten lately as investors have been caught off sides with too much risk and been forced to reign in their exposures or book profits. No other area potentially highlights this greater than in tech, where “Nasdaq” exposures comprised over 40% of N. America net exposures. Nevertheless, markets lurched lower and investors cut exposures; by the end of the week our MS New Tech Basket (MSXXNTCH) — which is comprised of 20 different stocks — was down -8% on Friday. Furthering that point was Google (GOOGL) who ended the week down almost 8% despite posting the fastest Google Websites rev growth ex-FX since 4Q11 and at one point becoming the world’s most valuable company. One of the only bright spots to note in tech this week was that I took a dive into the unfamiliar world of Millennials, downloading Venmo and by booking through AirBnB; wish me luck,
Looking at that list, it seems no surprise that many of the perceived highest quality companies are also some of the largest, most well-owned and therefore most recently among the worst punished. Recalling back to 2015, one of the more telling statistics of this group was around the outperformance of the largest names in the S&P500 where the difference between the average return of the top 10 names by weight and the average of all the other 490 names was nearly 20%. So far this year, the mega-cap cohort appears to be continuing to shine as earnings show that the S&P100 has beat earnings by +4.7% and beat by 1.2% on sales while the rest of the S&P 500 beat EPS +2.0% and missed sales by -1.6%. As they say, size matters. Sticking with that concept, 42 companies within the S&P have the same total market capitalization as the next 458 and therefore, regardless of if you believe the S&P will move up or down, either way these 42 names — or 44% of the S&P 500’s market capitalization and 46% of earnings — will have a large part to say in the matter. With that in mind, our US Equity Strategist Adam Parker has done a deep dive into this segment of the market attempting to contextualize what growth rates are in the price, where we think our fundamental analysts appreciably differ from consensus, and offer some quantitative approaches for stock selection. Based on that analysis, Bank of America (BAC), Gilead (GILD), IBM (IBM), JP Morgan (JPM), and Citigroup (C) are likely to generate excess return over Exxon Mobil (XOM), Disney (DIS), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY), UnitedHealth (UNH), and Chevron (CVX). Please ask for Adam’s work around the Large Caps.
Energy has been one the biggest sources of pain for markets, whether it be directly or indirectly given it’s far reaching impacts on both a sector and geographical basis. This week both ConocoPhillips (COP) and Exxon Mobil(XOM) sounded the alarm as the former was forced to cut its dividend and the latter suspend its buyback program. However, what has been somewhat reassuring is that prices appear to have settled and while many are still assessing the impacts of prolonged lower prices on other assets, investors also seem to be discussing the scenarios necessary for oil to rebound. Ironically perhaps, while ‘Lower for Longer’ used to refer to the Fed’s rate policy on rates, our Energy Commodity Strategist, Adam Longsonnow suggests it more accurately reflects the price of oil on the back of his forecast revisions where he now expects low oil prices to persist for longer than we previously assumed. The expectation is for oil to finish the year around $30 and remain volatile until 2017. China has been slowing, reducing demand, however oil inventories have been rising, creating an unbalanced supply demand, skewing price to the downside. Given this backdrop, we continue to like names that have solid assets, healthy growth rates and (most importantly) strong balance sheets; Total (FP FP), Eni (ENI IM), BP (BP/ LN), Cimarex (XEC), Noble* (NBL) and EQT (EQT) are top picks while also going short Whiting Petroleum (WLL), Murphy Oil (MUR) and Southwest Energy (SWN) is an attractive way to pair off given these volatile markets. Looking across to Financials which have been heavily scrutinized given the loan book exposure to energy, is too likely early to be positive on energy-exposed US mid-caps BOK Financial (BOKF), Cullen/Frost (CFR) and Zions Banc (ZION), whereas the US large-caps look oversold, specifically for names such as Bank of America (BAC), US Bancorp (USB) and BB&T (BBT). In Europe, these forecasts reinforce our caution on Standard Chartered (STAN) as well as DNB (DNB NO) which this week reported moderately higher oil-related provisions.
In Europe, energy exposure has clearly not been the only issue for banks which intra-week were down nearly 12% before recovering to end the week down around 5%. It is really starting to feel like Q3 again given the dispersion in share price performance around result as SEB (SEBA SS) and ING (INGA NA) both up nearly 10%, against Credit Suisse (CSGN SW) down more than 10% after reporting its first full-year loss since 2008 after booking a big impairment charge at its investment banking business which suggests that challenges facing management may be underestimated. Meanwhile UBS* (UBSN SW), another key restructuring play also disappointed with lower than expected operating performance in Wealth Management and Investment Bank but managed to nearly negate those concerns by reporting that its balance sheet currently sits at a healthy 14.5% CET1 ratio as well as by declaring an ordinary and special dividend equivalent to 5% yield. The need for a strong balance sheet certainly seems to be a theme for European banks and given that the better capitalized banks have already de-rated so much, there looks to be little reason to be bullish the lower quality names such as Deutsche Bank (DBK GY), Commerzbank (CBK GY), Unicredit (UCG IM), Barclays (BARC LN). Potentially the more frustrating and demoralizing region as it pertains to earnings growth, what was a potential glimmer of hope this year has already faded. . In the last four weeks alone, consensus 2016 EPS growth for MSCI Europe has fallen from 6.1% to just 3.8% today. The declines have been largest in commodity sectors, but we have also seen a sharp deterioration broadly too. Earnings declines notwithstanding, the banks sector is still showing a significant amount of dispersion in large cap, liquid names and should be on the radar of anybody seeking opportunities internationally. Fortunately, for those interested the European Financials Conference in London is just over one month away and with over 115 (90+ w/ CEOs & CFOs) of Europe's key financial institution present, it is an excellent forum to better assess the opportunity set. Please ask for more details on the conference if you are interested.
Over in Asia, the week felt relatively quiet (HSI -2.0%) as we await China’s FX reserve number for January (out Sunday). Whether the current dollar weakness is a new trend or not is hard to say, but the pressure on CNY will likely ease if it is. With the FX numbers expected to fall by around $188bn to $3.2tn (exceeding the record $106bn decline in December), there may be some upside given a 1) a very bearish expectation with the range of MoM declines from 120bn (the most bullish) to 200bn (the most bearish) and the fact that 2) China has started reinforcing many of the existing outflow rules this month (which they did not do previously in December). Strategist Jonathan Garner updated his EM/APXJ Industry Framework since its inception in Nov 2015. His industry framework ranks the largest 100 country/industry groups in EM/APXJ equities based on 13 qualitative and quantitative measures, incorporating country models and analysts’ bottom up views. The key upgrade includes Korea Semiconductor and China Utilities to OW and key downgrades includes ASEAN consumer services, HK Div Financials to UW, ASEAN Banks to UW, Taiwan Insurance and India Banks to EW. Notable large-cap stocks within OW industries include KEPCO (015760 KS), Sun Hung Kai Properties (16 HK), Ping An Insurance (2318 HK),SK Hynix (000660 KS), TSMC (2330 TT), Guangdong Investment (270 HK) and Infosys (INFO IN) . Bellwether AIA (1299 HK) was down 9% intraday Wednesday post news that Union Pay International is capping debit and credit cards at $5,000. However, concerns on the negative read through for AIA are overblown as overseas purchases have always been subject to a $5,000 cap…now they are just going to enforce this limit. Earnings this week were relatively quiet but I would highlight Amorepacific* (002790 KS) and Lenovo* (922 HK). Amorepacific* (002790 KS), which despite missing consensus 4Q numbers on extrapolated positive read through from LG H&H’s strong growth in duty free, showed strong growth momentum across all geographies/channels (+38% YoY OP growth). Despite a 3Q beat Lenovo was down 10% on concerns that ongoing cost cutting measures will erode competiveness; cost cutting is simply not a durable long-term strategy. Market Internet Analyst Rob Lin remain bullish on Baidu (BIDU US) ahead of the upcoming print and expects in-line 4Q15 results driven by 32% YoY revenue growth. Given the onslaught of negative earnings revisions and falling ROEs, some of the stocks that offer stable return and growth but are trading cheap relative to their historic valuations include: E.Sun Financial (2884 TW), Hollysys (HOLI US), Weibo Corp ( WB US), and AviChina (2357 HK). In a market where it seems that nothing can be said with conviction, the one thing I feel wholeheartedly confident about saying is that the Chinese markets won’t go down next week. Unfortunately, it will be because they are closed for the New Year.
Japan is often called the Land of the Rising Sun, but given the Nikkei is now back below 17,000 and the Yen is resisting any depreciation, the impact of negative rates in the absence of growth will likely be negligible as Japan increasingly is looking anything but Sunny or Rising. This week (Topix -4.4%) marked JPY’s largest weekly advance against USD since 2009. FX Strategist Hans Redeker notes that the negative rate is unlikely to drive much more diversification out of Japan given the current risk backdrop and the advanced stage of diversification from Japan’s pension funds. It is starting to feel like QE3 should have a different meaning - Quickly Eroding 3: Market Sentiment, Yen Weakness, and Investor Confidence in Central Banks. Given a continued thirst for yield, our derivatives team introduced a new liquidity-weighted, 80-member basket (MSJNJPYD Index) targeting high dividend, high ROE names. I’d highlight meaningful Real Estate & JREIT exposure here makes it a more liquid alternative to the TSE REIT index (also less liquid). Also, the basket excludes banks but does include Dai-ichi Life (8750 JP). Real Estate Analyst Omuro-san also did a deep dive into JREITs and reiterated his Attractive sector view on account of stocks looking undervalued as yield products, shareholder returns are high, and the limited impact of negative rates on the sector. JREITs now rank ahead of developers and housing stocks. His top picks are: Japan Excellent (8987 JP), Japan Hotel REIT (8985 JP), and Japan Real Estate (8952 JP). This quarter will likely mark the 13th straight quarter of earnings beats in Japan, but comes on the back of downwardly revised consensus estimates (vs. prior quarters of beats on upwardly revised consensus estimates). Unlike in the US, on an absolute basis earnings in Japan are still showing YoY growth. At a third of the way through Topix earnings (by market cap), operating income (ex-fins) have beaten consensus by 2.7%. The biggest beats have come from Real Estate, Textiles & Apparels, Shippers, Services & Chemicals, whereas Metals, Airlines and Electric Appliances have missed. Notably, Sharp (6753 JP) was up (17%) after announcing it is considering a deal with either of INCJ or Hon Hai* (2317 TT). Some major beats on earnings this week include: Terumo (4543 JP), Nikon (7731 JP) and Yamada Denki (9831 JP). The negatives include: Mitsumi Electric (6767 JP) and Net One Systems (7518 JP). A few more name to highlight that look cheap and show stable return and growth: Bridgestone (5108 JP), Mazda Motor (7261 JP), and Mitsubishi Heavy (7011 JP).
In what has become one of our strongest idea-rich reports, our Alpha Team updated their Call Categories report this week, which classifies each stock by the nature of its investment story in an attempt to position key forward looking stock calls by Morgan Stanley Research over the last month. For January, the team highlights several names within Self-Help: Estee Lauder (EL), General Electric (GE) and Children’s Place Inc (PLCE) where the company's systems implementations, store fleet optimization, and expansion into wholesale and international franchising are all providing support to operating income while the children's apparel environment remains highly promotional. On the secular growth front, O’Reilly Auto (ORLY) will benefit from a number of secular drivers – a growing and aging auto fleet, healthy underlying parts demand, market share gains, expanding gross margins, and minimal e-commerce pressure. On the short side, the team sees several stocks as likely to de-rate in the near term, including Telesites SAB (SITESL MM) which LatAm TMT’s Michel Morin sees as overextended given that it currently trades at a 2016e EV/EBITDA of ~20x, above global tower peers at 13-18x and at a material premium to Mexican infrastructure stocks at 11-13x. The report goes on to also highlight HCA Holdings (HCA), Symantec (SYMC), Ameriprise Financial (AMP), Newell Rubbermaid (NWL), Teva Pharmaceuticals (TEVA) and Microsoft (MSFT) on the positive side and Whiting Petroleum (WLL), Nordstrom (JWN) and VF Corp (VFC) on the negative side. Please ask for the full report.
Focus on single names was also on display in our bi-weekly “Global Sales Idea” meeting which included ServiceMaster Global Holdings (SERV US), Estee Lauder Companies (EL US) and Recruit Holdings (6098 JP) pitched as longs and EuropCar Group (EUCAR FP) pitched as a short. ServiceMaster Global Holdings (SERV US), a leading provider of essential residential services, has, in its seven years as a private company, made significant improvements to its operations. Denny Galindo, therefore, likes the cash-flow prospects and sees upside to his $48 12-month price target. Estee Lauder Companies (EL US) is likely to see topline growth acceleration driven by its non-heritage brands, while heritage brands are going through a turnaround period. Favorable channel- and brand mix, as well as greater pricing power make Dara Mohsenian believe that EL should continue to grow faster than its CPG peers, with in-line valuations to the group. Last up on the long side, Recruit Holdings’ (6098 JP) momentum remains positive in existing businesses and mgmt has a healthy appetite towards business investment. The key themes for Recruit are the pursuit of investments and profit growth over the next year. This stock has already proven resilient in a tricky market environment, and Testuro Tsusaka-san opines that the outperformance is likely to continue. Lastly, from a short angle EuropCar Group (EUCAR FP) is very attractive given that OEM funding costs are on the rise and used car prices are rolling over. Anne Grube sees that both factors represent earnings risk for Europcar, which could follow the path already laid out by CAR and HTZ here in the US, as they have significantly de-rated.
Nevertheless, please find below a selection of this week's data points, charts and research from each region (Europe, US, Latam, Asia, Japan, EEMEA) that I believe points to an inflection or material change for individual sectors, companies and/or the macro environment this week. I have tried to avoid the obvious beats and misses and instead highlight what I thought to be the more significant trends and inflection points.
Have a great weekend,
Nick


*Included in my 2016 Global Ideas Deck. Please ask for the presentation.

TRENDS & INFLECTION POINTS

Positive

ìUS – Housing – James Egan, US Housing Strategist, is assessing the health of the housing market. Amid concern related to the US economy, housing has been an area of stability. Even though elements of one recent survey suggest that the rate of household formations is slowing, he thinks it is mostly a blip in the data. He continues to remain constructive that the rate of household formations remains above long-term average levels, particularly given demographic factors and improving signs around lending reflected in the Fed’s Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey. Housing prices are also improving, partly driven by tight supply – which is driving housing starts. Total housing starts finished the year at 1,111k – the highest level we’ve seen since 2007 and multifamily starts now at their highest levels since 1987.

ì Europe – Economics & Strategy – With weaker oil prices, the EU referendum and a more dovish governor, MS Chief UK Economist Jacob Nell and team expect a wait-and-see stance from the MPC. They expected an unchanged 8-1 vote to stay on hold and a shift to a more dovish near-term stance, driven by three recent developments. First, the sharp fall in oil prices weighs on near-term inflation, which they believe will not rise above 1% until September. Second, they now expect the EU referendum in the summer rather than the autumn, bringing forward the related uncertainty, which they expect will slow growth and keep the MPC on hold. And finally, there has been a clear dovish turn in the governor’s stance: he said unequivocally, "now is not yet the time to raise interest rates”. They expect GBP to have a volatile Thursday, given the market's aggressive pricing for low rates for longer. Their focus will be on the MPC's assessment of risks from the global economy and higher market volatility. They remain sellers of GBP/USD on rebounds as they expect reduced flows into UK assets this year. Front-end GBP rates currently price in around a 30% probability of a rate cut from the MPC over the next 12 months. This is difficult to justify, given MPC communication to date. They suspect that the current pricing is driven more by broader expectations that DM central banks will have to ease more, so the pricing for the MPC may remain rich for some time, regardless of domestic fundamentals. The EU referendum also poses a downside risk which could justify the current premium, although they do not believe it is the reason the market has rallied.

ì China – Macau – With a shift in sentiment, Gaming Research analyst Praveen Choudhary has turned more positive in his 2016 outlook, and upgraded his view on Macau from cautious to inline. His top picks are Galaxy (27 HK) and Melco Crown (MPEL US). They upgraded the industry based on; 1) After several negative GGR revisions, GGR growth expectations have largely remained stable since July 2015. EBITDA margin has largely remained stable since 1Q15 despite weaker GGR; 2) Mass revenue decline has narrowed to single digit in December; 3) Valuation has become much more reasonable.
ì US – Airlines – Rajeev Lalwani, US Airlines Analyst, is looking at how airlines would perform in a recession and thinks the risk reward of his group has improved considerably post the YTD sell-off. In his recession scenario, he found that the group would hold its own as potential earnings declines would be about one-half the 100%+ reductions seen in 2009. Among the carriers, based on his scenario analysis, earnings would likely be down least for ultra-low-cost carriers, then low cost / leisure airlines, followed by the legacies. Within the groups, Allegiant (ALGT), Alaska (ALK), and Delta (DAL) rank well and American (AAL), Hawaiian (HA), and United (UAL) less so

ìEurope – Autos & Auto Parts – îAuto supplier organic growth is seen as a structural story, but MS EU Auto Parts analyst Victoria Greer and team find that industry mix improvements, driven by cheap credit, have been a major cyclical support. Supplier organic growth has been well ahead of auto volume growth for the past six years, supported by structural trends (reducing emissions, move to autonomous driving). Over the same period, they estimate that the falling cost of debt has been a c.300bps annual tailwind to price/mix in the US auto market, and almost 600bps for the European OEMs' global businesses (excluding China local production). This has been a major cyclical support to auto suppliers: it implies underlying market growth well ahead of production; and supplier content is typically much higher on premium cars. Any deterioration in the cost of credit, credit availability or used car prices could reverse this benefit – the YoY cost of credit for European OEMs is now rising. Credit is the key risk to their FY16outlook, with suppliers' PE premium vs. the OEMs and US peers at all-time highs. Move Valeo to UW.

ì Japan – J-REIT – Tomoyoshi Omuro-san, Japan Real Estate Analyst notes that Amid an uncertain external environment, he expects J-REITs to be re-rated. Stocks look undervalued as yield products, shareholder returns are high (payout ratio approaching 100%), property market are improving, and BoJ purchasing is supportive. He believes the impact from BoJ's introduction of negative rates will be limited. He reiterates his attractive industry view and sets his industry preference as J-REIT, real estate, and housing (formerly real estate, J-REITs and housing). Although real estate stocks have a higher valuation upside, with the external environment remaining unsettled, he believes J-REITs are a more obvious option as a yield product due to the high beta of real estate stocks. (2) He has revised price targets in keeping with changes in his earnings forecasts.
ìUS – Banks – Ken Zerbe and Betsy Graseck, US Mid-Cap and Large-Cap Banks Analysts respectively, have compiled a summary of individual bank exposure to energy lending. They look at the size of energy exposure, the amount of reserves, and percentage of tangible book among others. In the midcap space, Ken tends to favor banks that have no energy exposure and that can grow loans faster than peers given niche business models while maintaining better-than-peer credit quality — specifically BKU, FRC, SBNY, and SIVB, all rated Overweight. In large caps, Betsy likes BAC and RF.

ì Europe – UK Food Retail – According to figures published by real estate consultancy firm Barbour ABI over the weekend, Lidl has stepped up its UK expansion plan by issuing almost three times as many planning applications as Aldi for new supermarkets in 4Q15. Lidl filed 48 applications, worth ~£150m in construction costs alone, during the three months to the end of 2015. Aldi filed 17, by comparison, during the same period. For the whole of 2015, Lidl filed a total of 104 applications. Aldi filed 101. As a result, Lidl has posted a material acceleration in its total sales and sales density growth in recent quarters: in 4Q15, Lidl sales increased by +20% y-o-y (vs. +16% for Aldi and -0.3% for the industry in total) as per Kantar data. In1Q15, Lidl sales had been up 'only' +12% y-o-y as a comparison (vs. +20% for Aldi and +1.0% for the industry in total). MS EU Food Retailer Analyst Edouard Aubin and team estimate that in 4Q15, Lidl posted a LFL sales increase of approx. +10% in the UK, adjusting the Kantar data for the company's store expansion program. This compares to ~0% for Tesco, 0.4% for Sainsbury (15 weeks to 9 January, as reported in its Q3 IMS) and+0.2% for Morrisons (9 weeks to 3rd January). With total European sales reaching ~€80bn in 2015, Lidl is now the largest grocer in Europe, ahead of Carrefour, Tesco and Aldi, by a wide margin.

ì Australia – Engineering & Construction – Nicholas Robison, Australia Engineering, Chemicals, and Packaging Analyst thinks macro E&C conditions remain weak, however the steps required to form a bottom are converging. After three years of almost solely negative signposts the first evidence of incremental market rebalancing is emerging with: 1) administrations and M&A removing capacity; 2) proactive balance sheet repair (reducing incentives to act irrationally); and 3) a broader range of work coming to the market (other than mining / oil & gas construction). With differentiation now appropriate he makes his first upgrades in ~3 years – DOW to OW, UGL to EW. AMC and ORA have scope to use capital to supplement growth in more challenged markets. Both stocks are expected to highlight this lever at 1H16 – ORA through bolt-on M&A and AMC by way of an additional buy back. He continues to see the upside that could emanate from this capital allocation as greater for ORA with consensus still unrealistically, in his view, expecting ORA to deleverage. With his FY16-18e EPS estimates 2-10% ahead of the Street – ORA is his top pick.

Negative
î US Media – Ben Swinburne, US Cable & Satellite Analyst, believes the escalation of sports rights will continue and is emerging as a major long-term risk to networks. Looking forward, given the risk of (1) accelerating cord-shaving and (2) secular (shift to digital) and cyclical (waiting for next recession) pressures to TV ad spending, fixed sports obligations inside of major media companies create greater downside earnings risk than exposure to non-sports programming. For example, in 2016/17 both Disney and Time Warner will see the NBA rights fee step-ups negatively impact their margins. He would view CBS losing its contract for Thursday Night Football as a positive but reiterates his Overweight rating given CBS’ advertising outlook. Meanwhile, he is below consensus on the cable segment at Disney and think upcoming F1Q results will likely pressure the premium multiple. The negative skew toward sports rights, reinforces his Cautious industry view.

î Europe – Oil & Gas – In 2015, oil companies took Final Investment Decisions for just six projects. This year, the number is likely to be even lower. This included Johan Svedrup (Statoil, Norway), Maria (Wintershall, Norway), West Nile Delta (BP, Egypt), Appomattox (Shell, Gulf of Mexico), Culzean (Maersk, UK) and Go FLNG (Perenco, Cameroon). Combined, these six projects present a capex commitment of ~$58bn, a fraction of what the industry typically did in previous years. As a result of delays over the last two years, there is now a sizeable 'inventory' of upstream projects that could be undertaken if and when market conditions make them sufficiently attractive. Outside US shale, they count 232 projects in pre-FID stage. If all were undertaken, the total investment required would be ~$1.0tn. Funding those investments provides a further constraint that they cannot screen for at the project level. That will need to be resolved at the corporate level, and partly depends on which projects companies want deprioritize. However, with oil prices in line with the forward curve – $32-37/bbl in 2016 – and some spending commitments for maintenance and FIDs from prior years, capex budgets are under even greater pressure than in 2015. Also, with industry cost coming down rapidly now, operators have an incentive to wait, which has the added side-effect that it leads to even greater supply chain weakness and further cost deflation. Therefore, it is likely that not all nine will go ahead.

î China – Energy & Chemicals – Andy Meng, China Energy & Materials Analyst believes the profit warnings from PetroChina and COSL imply more downside risk to upstream earnings in 2016. Andy Meng believes that the poor 4Q15 results highlight the earnings risk in 2016 and that upstream earnings will continue to miss consensus materially. PetroChina profit warning expects 2015 net profit to decline 60-70% YoY from Rmb107bn in 2014, this implies 2015 net profit of Rmb32-43bn and 4Q15 net profit of Rmb1-12bn. Andy believes the wide range of 4Q15 results mainly reflects the uncertainty of book value revaluation gain. Assuming the high-end earnings are reported in 4Q15, the 2015 full-year results would be 7% below his estimate and 12% below consensus. In 2016, Andy’s earnings estimates are 87% below consensus. COSL also reported profit warning with 2015 net profit expects to decline 85% YoY from Rmb7.5bn in 2014 and implies 2015 net profit of Rmb1.1bn and 4Q15 net loss of Rmb125mn. If so, COSL 2015 full-year results would be 26% below Andy’s estimate and 51% below consensus. For 2016, Andy’s earnings estimates are 77% below consensus.

î EEMEA – SA Retailers – Competition is rising, the SA economy is deteriorating – what does this likely mean for apparel growth? Michelle Olivier’s (our SA retail analyst) proprietary analysis suggests ~9% 2015-18 CAGR – hardly enticing. Yet could different return requirements allow new entrants to take market share? Even though she lowered her earnings estimates for Mr Price, it still has the largest earnings downside risks followed by Truworths (7%-9%), should real disposable income growth slow to +0.7%, combined with a 100bps rate increase and low consumer confidence levels (-8) in 2016. Foschini (OW) and Woolworths (OW) top picks.

î LatAm – Brazil Banks – Jorge Kuri (our LatAm banks analyst) took a detailed look at how the banks' new guidance compares with consensus estimates. He thinks Itaú's new guidance better reflects the ongoing challenges on revenues and provisions than is the case at Bradesco. Itaú's net income using the mid-point of the guidance range is around R$19.6bn (13% below current consensus of R$22.7bn); while Bradesco's net income at the mid-point of the guidance range is R$18.9bn, 11% above current consensus of R$16.9bn. He reiterates his bearish view on Brazilian banks and believes another leg of underperformance is ahead.
î US Oil – Adam Longson, US Energy Commodity Strategist, is lowering his oil price forecasts and Andrew Sheets, Chief Cross Asset Strategist, is looking at the implications of a lower for longer oil environment across asset classes. On Oil, Adam’s revised forecast is below. He expects 4 factors to delay rebalancing and keep prices subdued for longer than previously forecast: 1) Weaker than expected demand; 2) Higher than expected supply; 3) Rising inventories; and 4) Increased hedging incentives. Over the longer term (2018+), Adam writes that materially higher prices will be needed to keep the market in balance. See below for his updated Brent price forecasts

î Europe – Leisure & Hotels – MS EU Leisure & Hotels Analyst Jamie Rollo and team’s monthly travel agents survey shows the "wave" season made a solid start, but that this faded after the stock market weakness, Istanbul attacks, and Zika. Their webscraping survey suggests cruise pricing has weakened as well. China remains a fundamental concern for us. They trim their RCL PT to $99. Agents cited particularly strong demand for the Caribbean and Alaska, boosted by the strong economy, USD, new ships, new advertising campaigns, and refreshed product. Promotions are high, but continue to be amenity- rather than price-led, with RCL recently tightening its price integrity policy. However, demand seems to have slowed in recent weeks after the Istanbul terrorist attacks, weak stock market, Presidential election distraction, and Zika virus. Cruise lines are not panicking but some agents indicate perks are rising and rates falling slightly. Agents say Royal Caribbean's product continues to resonate more than Carnival's with consumers. Quantitative webscraping of cruise prices shows prices weakening recently. YoY average 2016 price increases have weakened for most lines since their last webscraping one month ago, including Carnival (+10% to +5%),Royal Caribbean (+15% to +13%), Celebrity (0% to -4%), Princess (2% to -2%),Costa (+6% to -1%) and P&O (+3% to -6%). The bigger hit at the premium lines and European lines reflects their larger exposure to more exotic deployments and destinations that are perceived to be riskier. Contemporary lines are still enjoying price increases taken in Q4, but some of these seem to be reversing too. They caution about reading too much into webscraping given calendar / channel shifts, but this data is concerning.

î India – Economics – Chetan Ahya, Chief Asia Economist report that the RBI kept key rates unchanged, in line with expectations. With the RBI on pause, the repo rate remains at 6.75%.The reverse repo rate and marginal standing facility rate remain at 5.75% and 7.75%, respectively. The cash reserve ratio (CRR) remains unchanged at 4%. In its policy statement, the RBI highlighted that it expects inflation to decelerate to 5% by end-F2017 and will be closely tracking actual inflation data to assess moderation in inflation trajectory. In particular the statement highlights: "The Reserve Bank continues to be accommodative even as it leaves the policy rate unchanged in this review, while awaiting further data on the development of inflation. Chetan expects another 25-50bps of rate cuts and holds to his view that inflation will be sustainably lower at 4.75% YoY in QE Mar-17, with risks to the downside. Drivers of inflation remain benign (rural/urban wages, fiscal deficit, global commodity prices) and supportive of a deceleration in inflation outlook.
î US OTAs – Brian Nowak, US Internet Analyst, is reiterating his caution on the OTAs in 2016 due to slowing room night growth and continued deteriorating room night economics. Meanwhile, PCLN's cost of bookings is rising at record levels – PCLN's ratio of bookings growth to ad spend growth is set to fall 16% in 2015. Given these trends, he is lowering his expected forward margins. He is also modestly reducing his forward room night growth and take rates (due to macro uncertainty in Europe and increased competitive pressure). Both EXPE and PCLN have sold-off recently but Brian stays on the sidelines until he sees a source of upward revisions
î Europe – Retailing – EU Retail Analyst Geoff Ruddell and team think trading conditions in 2016 will be less benign than in either2014 or 2015. Although they do not anticipate the operating environment being especially challenging, they think consensus forecasts are significantly too high. Despite recent weakness, they retain their 'Cautious' stance. Whilst the retailers have struggled to capitalize on it, they think the operating environment has been unusually supportive over the last couple of years. In the coming year, however, they expect weaker demand growth, more opex inflation and greater FX pressures on sourcing costs. They don’t expect 2016 to be especially difficult, but they do think it will be more challenging than 2014 or 2015. Although the sector has fallen 10%since the beginning of November (twice as much as the wider UK market) they believe that many of the retailers are still significantly over-valued. They continue to see 20%+ downside in ASOS, Halfords, Pets at Home, Dunelm and Dixons Carphone, all of which they continue to rate at Underweight.

î China – Consumer Discretionary – Robby Gu, China Discretionary Analyst sees limited improvement in 2016 as he expects air conditioning channel destocking will last for two summers instead of consensus expectation of only one. He continues to rate Midea as his top pick. He does not expect demand to recovery strongly this year, due to flat new property sales growth and low probability of replacement demand surprising on the upside. Therefore, his revenue forecasts for Midea and Gree are 6-13% below consensus in 2016-17. But inventory risk is still manageable. Despite slower industry growth, he believes strong players will benefit from supplier consolidation, product mix upgrade, efficiency improvement and favorable raw material cost trend. He believes Midea to widen its lead over peers in the next three years, driven by its leading e-commerce strategy (online sales accounts for 12% of revenue), efficiency gains from expansion of Annto logistic network, and exposure to small appliance segment. Its collaborative innovation with tech giants bodes well for its future in the smart home business, and recent ventures with Yaskawa and investment in Kuka also lay the foundation for its development in robotics. The stock is attractively valued at 8.3x 2016 P/E or 5.2x ex-cash, vs. 13% recurring EPS CAGR in 2014-17.

î EEMEA – Russian Retailers – Falling oil, a weaker RUB and incremental additional trade restrictions (Turkey) will inevitably lead to higher inflation at a time when the consumer surely cannot bear it, and retailers are struggling to pass it through. Nick Ashworth (our EEMEA consumer analyst) has seen top line slowdowns in 2H for most, but he believes this will likely continue in 1H16 given the very tough comp base, following a strong start to 2015 before consumer behaviour changed. This should mean EBITDA margin contraction for most. The current macro woes could lead to consolidation in the market over the next 1-2 years.
CHARTS
US Equity L/S Gross & Net Leverage Exposure
As of yesterday, Gross exposure is currently at 150%. We haven’t seen de-grossing recently because funds have sold longs, however, they have also added shorts and hedges. If market continues to have big swings on the downside, it’s more likely that funds will begin to degross. On the flipside, 1-day nets have come down to 45% as of yesterday which is near multi-year lows.

The Correlation of Returns within the Mega Capitalization Cohort is High versus History
Chief US Equity Strategist Adam Parker highlights that the correlation within mega-cap stocks has risen from markedly lower levels in July 2014 and is high today relative to history. This increased correlation is due in part to macro forces, such as slowing growth in China, continuing weakness in crude oil, constant questions about the Fed path, dollar strength, and other factors.
P&C Pricing Pressures

P&C Insurance Analyst Kai Pain is out with his detailed 2016 Property & Casualty Insurance Primer. Inside, he gives a) an industry overview, b) key investment considerations, c) company specific details and theses, d) emerging trends, and e) insight to performance around catastrophes
Domestic Loan Demand & Standards
US Large Cap Banks analyst Betsy Graseck notes in her Fed Sr. Loan Offer Survey note that many (30% of large bank respondents) expect to tighten standards this year in the corporate book as uncertainty in the energy sector and possible knock-on impacts to industrial economy weigh on credit officers. 25% of respondents expect to raise interest rates charged on C&I loans. Banks also expect an increase in delinquencies and charge-offs for all categories of commercial loans in 2016, which is in-line with MSe, given historically low levels and expected credit deterioration in the energy portfolios. Partial offset is from mortgage, where banks expect to ease standards for GSE-eligible and nonconforming jumbo mortgage loans, and interest rates to rise (alongside spreads). She expects average y/y loan growth to increase from 4.9% in 2015 to 5.5% in 2016.
US Economics – Potential GDP
Our Chief US Economist Ellen Zentner pegs US potential GDP growth at 1.5%Y. This estimate takes into account her sobering view of the economy's supply side dynamics that assumes only a gradual climb in productivity to around 1%Y and very slow growth in the labor force of around 0.5%Y.
The Only Way Is Down (with Apologies to Lovers of 1980s Music Hits)
For those too young to know or too old to remember, The Only Way Is Up was not just an 80s pop music hit
by Yazz and the Plastic Population, but also a big in central bank policy making circles. Relive it on Youtube or here!
Source: Morgan Stanley Research
A dreadful January of deteriorating markets and rising recession fears went out with a bang for central bank watchers when the BoJ unexpectedly announced that it was lowering its deposit rate into negative territory for most of the new excess reserves created in the banking system in future. With this step, the BoJ aims to lower money market rates (and through them also bond yields) while limiting the burden on the banking system and depositors more broadly. For some observers, this unexpectedly bold action marks a regime shift: Others see it as less of a change than the previous bold step in late 2014 and if anything are concerned about hints that the BoJ is starting to run out of assets to buy. In his speech today, Governor Kuroda stressed that further rate reductions are possible and that “there are no limits” to the BoJ’s easing campaign. But after four European central banks, including the ECB, have taken similar steps over the previous two years, central bank watchers seem to have become a bit blasé about the fact that you would now need to pay for the privilege of depositing your excess cash somewhere. That said, there is a key difference between the two policy tools central banks employ at the current juncture, i.e., asset purchases and negative rates. In the view of Elga Bartsch and Chetan Ahya, MS Global Co-Heads of Economics, negative interest rates tend to have stronger ramifications on the exchange rate. While this is very much a local issue for small, open economies, it could potentially become a global issue for larger economies. Download the Complete Report (1) Download the Complete Report (2) Download the Complete Report (3)
So where will 2015 EPS end up? (EM has been downgraded 40% + over last 12 mths) – 2015FY Consensus EPS by Region
This is likely Japan's 13th straight quarter of earnings beat but on back of downwardly revised consensus estimates - Full year F3/16 company guidance for earnings are down as well. F3/16 full year consensus earnings are down by 4% since the end of last earnings season (mid November, 2015). In addition, F3/16 full-year guidance by companies has been revised down as well for net income by 2.0% since end of last earnings season. Guidance for operating income and revenues (both ex financials) have been revised slightly down, by 0.2%. Download the Complete Report

Japan and US Best Estimates Whilst EM and APxJ Missed Thus Far for Oct-Dec Quarter 2015
Globally, Japan and S&P 500 have thus far beat consensus earnings this quarter while APxJ and EM have missed. S&P 500 earnings in aggregate have beat consensus estimates by 4.4%, with 56% mcap reported. In contrast, APxJ and EM, with only 19% and 23% mcap reported thus far, have missed consensus earnings by 5.8% and 6.2%, respectively. Download the Complete Report

European Momentum Continues to Roll Over
Source: MS Baskets Team and Alpha Team
After a 4% move in the Long/Short momentum basket yesterday, it is down another 1% today. The maximum duration of a momentum sell off since 1988 is 7 months, with an average of 1.9 months (3.6 for the worst 10).

Positioning in Japan – Impact on Banks
Japan positioning seems unlikely to hurt the banks given their ‘risk-on’ status going forward given that the long/short ratio is currently 1.26 which is extremely risk-off versus a high at 1.7x last July. It has only been lower in September 2011 through Nov 2012. Anecdotally, Long only accounts think sell-off is fundamentally overdone, and L/S accounts currently do not have appetite to buy banks given macro concerns regarding East Asia/China growth.

JREITS are coming into the spotlight for the first time since 2007
Real Estate Analyst, Omuro-san notes that amid an uncertain external environment, he expects J-REITs to be re-rated. Stocks look undervalued as yield products, shareholder returns are high (payout ratio approaching 100%), property market are improving, and BoJ purchasing is supportive. He believes the impact from BoJ's introduction of negative rates will be limited. (1) He reiterates his Attractive industry view and set his industry preference as J-REIT, real estate, and housing (formerly real estate, J-REITs and housing). Although real estate stocks have a higher valuation upside, with the external environment remaining unsettled, he believes J-REITs are a more obvious option as a yield product due to the high beta of real estate stocks. (2) He has revised price targets in keeping with changes in his earnings forecasts. Download the Complete Report

EM Flows (14 Straight Weeks): US$0.67bn In Outflows This Week
Dedicated EM equity funds (GEMs + EM Asia + EMEA and LatAm regional funds) reported outflows of US$0.67 bn for the week ended February 3, 2016. Excluding China A share equity fund flows, this week's outflows from EM funds amounted to US$1.1 bn. This marked the 14th consecutive week of outflows for dedicated EM equity funds. EM Asia regional funds reported largest outflows of US$0.52 bn, followed by GEM regional funds with outflows of US$0.16 bn. Outflows in LATAM funds were negligible. Meanwhile, EMEA regional funds reported inflows of US$0.01 bn this week. Dedicated EM ETF funds reported outflows of US$0.25 bn, while non-ETF/active funds reported outflows of US$0.42 bn in the current week. Dedicated EM non-ETF/active funds have continued to report outflows since May 2015. Download the Compete Report

Colombia’s Current Account Vulnerability – 7% GDP
Something’s got to give to rebalance Colombia’s economy and Luis Arcentales & Arthur Carvalho (our LatAm economics team) suspect that economic growth is the weakest link. As Colombia’s economy adjusts to lower oil prices, three major challenges have emerged: a widening current account deficit, a rising and persistent inflation, and a deterioration of the fiscal accounts. Luis & Arthur think the policy response to the three challenges should be twofold: further interest rates hikes should help curb inflation and improve the current account, while cutting government spending may be the only possible way to reach the authorities’ fiscal objectives. Download the Complete Report

RESEARCH

Positive

ì US – Ally Financial – Cheryl Pate, US Consumer & Specialty Finance Analyst, sees ALLY as the best execution story in her coverage, delivering 1) healthy credit performance, 2) prudent loan growth, while growing share and 3) capital return. She is reducing her price target marginally from $28 to $27, yet still sees >60% upside. Increased volumes in growth channels have come with only modest mix shift, and importantly, a corresponding increase in yields. In fact, consumer auto risk adjusted margins (NIM - NCO) improved 18bps in 2015, even with a 8bp increase in auto NCOs. Despite the positive fundamentals, Cheryl believes the stock is currently pricing in a recession, with significant credit deterioration and used car pricing pressures. Upcoming catalysts for ALLY are: 1) next week's investor day and 2) the institution of buybacks and a dividend through 2016 CCAR. Download the Complete Report

ì Europe – Amundi – MS EU Diversified Financials analyst Anil Sharma and team believe the share price will rise relative to the industry over the next 30days.This is because the stock has traded off recently, making short term valuation much more compelling. Adjusting earnings for surplus capital, Amundi trades on sub 11x calendar 2016 P/E (crediting ~1/2 the €1.3bn surplus only), which is the lowest in the EU traditional AM sector (avg. ~13-14x). Into results on 12Feb, they view the discount vs. peers as too wide and see scope to narrow given:(i) potential for flow beat vs. consensus with recent Q415 data suggesting Amundi inflows ahead of Q3; (ii) no Brexit risk; (iii) limited exposure to the UK's FCA competition review and; (iv) mark to market impact likely less severe vs. Peers given large fixed income skew (~70% of AUM) where YTD moves have been less severe than equities. They estimate that there is about a 70% to 80% (or "very likely") probability forth scenario. Estimated probabilities are illustrative and assigned subjectively based on their assessment of the likelihood of the scenario. Download the Complete Report

ì India – Hindustan Unilever – Nillai Shah, India Consumer Analyst upgrade Hindustan from EQ to OW. Contrary to popular perception, he expects stable volume trends for most categories for 2016 with broadly similar growth trends in both urban and rural areas. HUL is emerging as a clear winner based on the results of this survey. The strategy of multiple brands at multiple price points is working well across categories. There is a marked shift in the consumer perception of HUL brands in this survey vs. his earlier survey results (published on February 2, 2014). This includes brands like Wheel (vs. his previous survey, which favored Ghari), Lifebuoy (vs. his previous survey, which favored Dettol), and Surf. Over the next 12 months, his survey results suggest a marked improvement in performance for HUL’s brands across categories and especially some mass-market brands in rural areas. Download the Complete Report

ì EEMEA –Turkish Airlines – Rising security issues and competition risk have driven Turkish Airlines down ~20%, vs a market down only ~10%. Muneeba Kayani (EEMEA Industrial analyst) views these concerns as overdone regarding the impact of lower tourist arrivals on traffic. It was transfer traffic that drove Turkish Airlines' passenger growth in 2014-15, when direct travel remained flat, so Muneeba expects traffic to grow despite security concerns in Turkey. In addition, Muneeba’s fare checks reveal Turkish Airlines' fares are competitive, and higher margins can be maintained because fuel is a larger component of its total costs than for peers, it has competitive ex-fuel unit costs, competition (in particular from Gulf carriers) is not new, and she expects lower currency headwinds. At 6.4x FY16e EV/EBITDA, Turkish Airlines trades at a premium to network peers at 4.7x but this is supported by its higher growth (15% 2015-17e EBITDA growth vs 8% for peers). Her 2016-17e EPS increases by 28% due to 7% higher EBITDA and lower fleet capex estimates. Download the Compete Report

ì US – H&R Block – Thomas Allen, US Gaming and Leisure Analyst, is reiterating his Overweight rating on H&R Block. He likes HRB’s defensive characteristics, sizeable capital return opportunity and ACA tailwinds in the event of a recession. Following its bank sale, the company has guided to $3.5B of buybacks over the next 3.5 years and Thomas sees upside to $4B. ACA should be a growing driver in F16 as higher penalties (expected to increase from $200 on avg to $400-500 in the '16 tax season and $800 in '17) and stricter IRS enforcement should result in a greater number of filers seeking exemptions and going on exchanges, both pricing opportunities for HRB. Download the Complete Report

ì Europe – Vivendi – News flow around a possible deal with BeIn Sports is accelerating. MS EU Media & Internet analyst Adrien de Saint Hilaire and team think the market would welcome a deal. Under the right terms, this would underpin their positive view on a Bolloré-driven turnaround of Canal+. Stay OW. Discussions are said to have resumed early January and an agreement or failure to get a deal done could be announced by end of February or early March. These articles follow similar reports in Les Echos (14 January 2016) and BFM (23 December 2015). They also come a few weeks after Vincent Bolloré heralded a "€2bn investment plan" for Canal+ (BFM, 13 November 2015).Neither Vivendi nor BeIn Sports has commented on these press reports. They believe striking a deal could make sense for both parties. i) The French pay-tv profit pool is shrinking with Canal+ suffering from subscriber drain, while BeIn Sports is largely loss-making and its growth rate appears to be slowing. ii) Both will have to fight new kids on the block in the content market (e.g. Altice, Netflix). iii) A sale to Canal+ plus would give BeIn Sports' Qatar-backed owners an opportunity to exit a loss-making business in this low-oil price environment. iv) Vivendi has plenty of cash and treasury shares available to finance a deal. v) In Spain, BeIn Sports operates under a JV with Mediapro. vi) Canal+ previously responded to domestic competition by acquiring TPS and a stake in Orange Cinema Series (OCS). Download the Complete Report

ì Korea – Amorepacific – Kelly Kim, S. Korea Consumer Analyst reiterates an OW on Amorepacific post 4Q15 results. Excluding year-end employee incentives, 4Q15 results (+38% YoY OP growth) showed strong growth momentum across all geographies/channels – domestic cosmetics OP +61% YoY led by duty free sales +63% YoY and China sales +55% YoY. Mgmt’s 2016 guidance looked conservative (again) with China +30% YoY (vs MSe +40% YoY combined with margin expansion on robust growth of new brands) and duty free +low-20% YoY (vs MSe +44%), but Amore has a track record of consistently beating guidance 2015 actual OP was 19% above original guidance. Investors have become increasingly concerned about anything China-related and potential impact on Korea cosmetics names. It doesn’t help that MOTIE’s Jan exports data showed cosmetics exports materially slowing to +2% YoY in 3WJan vs +53% YoY in 2015. Kelly is not concerned about Amore’s topline growth in China and expects strong export momentum to continue in 1Q16 with +40% YoY. For long-term investors, this shouldn’t be a cause for concern as long as end sales stay strong. Download the Complete Report
ì LatAm – Wal-Mart De Mexico – Walmex's sales in January surprised positively (again) at SSS +9.7%, showing acceleration in growth exactly when the comparison base started to get tougher. Franco Abelardo (LatAm retail analyst) believes Walmex's good top line performance has been driven both by a positive momentum in Mexico's consumer space (that is lasting longer than Franco initially expected) and by Walmex's internal initiatives, including aggressive pricing versus competition. While the latter is positive from a market share perspective, it may also result in further margin pressure – for instance, Franco estimates that EBITDA margin for Walmex in Mexico contracted 110 bps Y/Y in 4Q15. Download the Complete Report

ì US – Avago – Craig Hettenbach, US Semiconductors Analyst, is raising his price target on Avago from $170 to $180 post the Broadcom acquisition announcement as he sees the synergy opportunity ultimately exceeding $1bn or 2-3X that of the transformative and successful LSI deal. This provides Avago a key lever to drive margin expansion, compensating for an otherwise slow growth environment. The acquisition of Broadcom catapults Avago to the third largest semiconductor supplier. Meanwhile, the pro forma market cap of $58bn is now above Texas Instruments, providing generalist investors another stock to choose from in this market cap range and at a 25% valuation discount. Craig is putting the spotlight on what he views as an unparalleled semiconductor franchise in networking, which should become an increasingly important part of the story (40% of sales, often overlooked). Finally, even after lowering estimates in wireless for Avago and Broadcom, Craig stresses that the next move in consensus estimates should be up, a rarity in the group. Download the Complete Report

ì Europe – Danone – Waters has become Danone's biggest growth driver in recent years. Whilst MS EU Food Producers Analyst Eileen Khoo and team think a 2016 slowdown could reignite market debate on the division's growth outlook, their 'deep-dive' suggests 7-12% LFL, resilient margins and ROIC upside medium term. They are now more bullish on Waters' LT prospects. Danone's stellar turnaround of its Waters business, from a trough of -4% LFL in 1Q09 to +11% average LFL and 7% EBIT CAGR over the last five years has confounded sceptics who viewed the business as commoditized and Aquadrinks as a short-term 'gimmick'. Whilst the division contributed only 6%of group growth in 2009, this has grown to >45% in 2014, helped by leading innovation, Aquadrinks growth (>25% growth in 2010-14) and a revival in Western Europe. In 2016, however, Waters is likely to be impacted by destocking of Danone's Mizone brand in China (c.30% of its total Waters sales) - this could reignite debate on the risk of growth slowdown, margin pressure and competitive risk for Waters, in their view. Danone's share price historically has reacted negatively to concerns on growth slowing. But their proprietary analysis gives us comfort on the favourable structural dynamics enjoyed by the Waters business, and they would be buyers on any short-term concern on growth for this division. They adjust their estimates to reflect a short-term slow down, but higher longer-term growth in Waters. Download the Complete Report

ì China – Baidu – Rob Lin, China Internet Analyst reiterates OW on BIDU going into results next week with PT: US$229, implying 32x non-GAAP ‘16e P/E and 50% upside. Rob expects an in-line quarter with +32% rev growth (mid-point of the guidance) and increasing mobile contribution. Mobile ad load increase should boost the overall search rev while mobile click through rate may have surpassed that of PC in the quarter. A risk here though is that GDP growth correlates well with BIDU core search rev growth. Although mobile is incremental this time due to increased user time spent and advertising rev, Rob is not ruling out some softness in key accounts (30% of rev) going forward. Hence, he takes down rev by 3%/2% in 2016/17e leading to 5%/6% cuts in non-GAAP EPADS – core search rev + 25% YoY in 2016. BIDU’s video biz iQiyi could surprise on the upside thanks to strong advertising rev and membership fees. iQiyi surpassed 10mn subscribers in the last quarter and traffic went up sharply thanks to its exclusive TV show “Running Man.” Regardless, O2O spending is a key driver of BIDU’s share price, and will cap the upside for now as 4Q15 earnings are set to decline 23% due to this O2O drag. Download the Complete Report

ì EEMEA– Ulker Initiation – Nick Ashworth (EEMEA consumer analyst) initiates at OW (PT TL24) and positions Ulker as his top pick in Turkey due to its best-in-class growth (2014-17e EPS CAGR of 21% versus mature FMCG peers at 11-12%), optionality of stronger export growth, and valuation - it trades on a similar multiple (21x 2016 PE) to FMCG peers. Nick sees a positive risk-reward skew at Ulker, driven by upside to export volumes (thanks to the Pladis distribution platform) and upside to margins (helped by scale and further cost saving measures). Nick models a 2015-17 sales CAGR of 17%, helping push 21% EPS CAGR. For an FMCG company, this is strong. It is almost twice the growth of a mature FMCG, for the same multiple (22x 2017 EPS). Download the Compete Report

Negative
î USXeroxBrian Essex, US Software & Services Analyst, is downgrading Xerox from OW to EW and is lowering his price target from $13.50 to $12. While he views the split as a positive catalyst, he is adjusting his estimates lower on weaker core fundamental performance and outlook. He also sees incremental risk to a CFO search still in process, initiation of a CEO search for the Services business, financing costs and restructuring initiatives associated with the spin. His price target of $12 is based on 10.0x FY16e EPS of $1.17, relatively in-line with peers going through transition and restructuring efforts. Download the Complete Report

î Europe – Saipem – MS EU Oil Services analyst Rob Pulleyn and team downgrade Saipem to Underweight relative to their coverage universe. Following their reassessment and adjustment of the risk-reward profiles for all the stocks in their coverage universe, Saipem compares less favorably. Their base, bear and bull valuations imply 19% downside to their price target, 64% downside to the bear case and 81% upside to the bull case. Despite the attractive upside to their bull case, this spread is consistent with their Underweight-rated names. They also consider valuation demanding for Saipem. The current price implies: P/BV of 0.7x, which compares to their forecast ROE of 2-4% 2017/18, and at the rights issue price of €0.362 the P/BV would be 0.5x.On EV/ IC, they estimate that the stock trades at 0.8x for ROCE also of 2-3%. This is demanding vs Technip trading at 2016 EV/ IC of 1x with ROCE >10%, Subsea 7 trading at 0.4EV/IC and Wood Group at 1.3x EV/ IC for >10% ROCE.EV/2016 EBITDA 6x, at a significant premium to peers such as Technip at 3.8x (which is net cash).FCF yield of 4% for 2016 and 5% for 2017 is not overly attractive, and risks for FCF forecasts are skewed downwards. P/E of 21x their 2016 estimates compares to Technip at 9x. Download the Complete Report

î ASEAN – Axiata Group – Navin Killa, ASEAN Telecoms and Media Analyst downgrades Axiata to UW as there are sizeable exposures to fast-growing and relatively underpenetrated mobile markets, such as Indonesia, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and India, together with steady cash flow from domestic operations. Historically, the government has offered telecom spectrum using a "beauty contest" – but the 2016 budget proposes that spectrum will be redistributed and offered for bidding. With plunging oil prices, the government deficit is targeted at 3.1% of GDP vs. 3.2% in 2015 and 3.4% in 2014, prompting the need for funding measures. New domestic competition and capex risk from domestic spectrum auction limit upside to stock price. Download the Complete Report

î LatAm – Itau Unibanco – Last quarter delinquency soared yet the balance sheet transfers helped. Itaú was able to meet bottom line expectations by using a large chunk of its excess reserves for loan losses. Jorge Kuri (our LatAm banks analyst) calculated that around R$1,822 million of pre-tax earnings, or 21% of the total, came from the balance sheet. Delinquency soared, way above Jorge’s already very negative expectations. The bank provided 2016 guidance that includes a significant jump in provisions next year. The consensus numbers have to adjust downward; as Jorge has argued before, current consensus of 13% net income growth for Itaú is unrealistic. Jorge’s forecast is -5%. Download the Complete Report

î US – Sysco – Vinnie Sinisi, US Retail, Food, & Drug Analyst, is downgrading Sysco from EW to UW given valuation and the lack of any meaningful positive medium-term catalysts. SYY’s valuation versus the S&P 500 is near the 90th percentile of the 10-year range. Additionally, consensus estimates imply an upward inflection in earnings after a multi-year period of essentially no growth. His $40 price target remains the same and is in-line with the current share price. Download the Complete Report
î Europe – Logitech – Logitech has the highest exposure in MS EU Tech analyst Andrew Humphrey and team’s coverage to a structurally challenged PC market, and they think fully prices in long-term targets. They think FY17e guidance at the March 2nd investor day could disappoint on margins, and downgrade to UW. Management has reorganised Logitech around newer growth verticals (Mobile Speakers, Video Collaboration), in tandem with a vigorous cost-reduction programme. The shares have traded up to the top of the historical valuation range at 1.1xEV/Sales and 12x EV/EBIT, and they think now fully price in long-term targets. From here they see more downside potential than upside, given PC-related peripherals will be ~60% of FY17e revenue in a market declining in double digits with weak macro. They think Logitech would still need to invest heavily to offset PC-related declines, and operating leverage could drive margins to undershoot. This is the largest exposure in their coverage to a part of the market where they expect greatest structural challenges, and they are concerned at 60%potential downside to fair value in their bear scenario. Download the Complete Report

î ASEAN – International Container Terminal Service – ICTSI underperformed MSCI PH by 36% in 2015 on earnings concerns amid global trade headwinds. Three years of price gains were erased in 2015. Yet Daniel Lau, ASEAN Healthcare and Transportation Analyst anticipates a further de-rating in 2016 as earnings come under pressure from lower throughput and given the margin impact from new port expansions and higher financing charges after an increase in perpetual financing. He initiates with a counter-consensus Underweight rating. Hi price target of PP34 is based on an EV/EBITDA multiple of 8x, 20% below the 10-year mean. Download the Complete Report
î US – GoPro – James Faucette, US Communications Systems & Applications Analyst, is reducing his PT from $12 to $9 and remaining UW due to the ramp in opex that will cause higher than expected losses for the foreseeable future. James had previously given the stock credit for ~$3/share in cash and marketable securities on the likelihood that management could choose to preserve cash and run the business for profitability. However, he thinks yesterday afternoon's commentary suggests substantial cash burn as management attempts to stimulate demand to return the company to growth. Download the Complete Report
î Europe – Credit Suisse – Q4 poses 4 tough questions for the company’s transformation plan. At ~0.75x 16e TNAV, or 9.3x 17e, there should be value, but MS EU Banks analyst Huw Van Steenis and team find risk-reward more attractive elsewhere. Move to EW. CS missed its pro forma capital ratio by 80bpsthrough higher-than-anticipated one-offs and the inability to lower RWAs enough. Whilst they appreciate that patience is required to look through to2018, CS has missed its only near-term target. They think this suggests CS's strategy may have been too top-down. The sub IPO of the Swiss unit should help capital ratios. However, weak capital formation, further litigation and expectations for incremental restructuring suggest a risk that CS could need to sell more, conceivably diluting earnings further to reach the 13% cT1 target (vs11.4% today). They no longer see CS's target of 13-14% RoE in 18e as plausible. Their new price target is based on 18e RoE nearer 10%. The fundamental challenge for CS, in their view, is its high operational leverage. Eg the new Markets division made a loss, even excluding one-offs in Q4. With management today signalling that cost cutting will be challenging, given its desire to reinvest, they believe its original cost-cutting strategy could come under review. They now forecast sales and trading -representing one-third of the Group's leverage capital - to be a near break-even business in 16e, well below that of its peers, and they lack confidence on18e PBT. Download the Complete Report

î China – Guangdong Alpha Animation and Culture – Ansel Lin, China Telecoms and Media Analyst thinks the transition from TV to new media and exposure to film investments helps premium content providers, but he sees significant downside risk to consensus estimates given uncertainty around new initiatives. At expensive 2016 P/Es of 49-71x on his estimates, he initiates on Alpha at UW with 31% downside. As it is the leading animation company with full value chain operations, he expects Alpha to accomplish IP-based OSMU content development after the acquisition of U17.com, the largest original comics web-platform in China. However, he has low visibility on this development due to 1) the variance of target customers between U17.com (teenagers and youth) and Alpha's existing business (low K12 age); 2) the change of strategy to high-budget IP content production; and 3) the hit-or-miss risk of content development. He estimates 13.7/23.3/21.7% revenue/OP/NPAT CAGR in 2014-17, and his earnings are 19-29% below consensus in 2016-17. He thinks positives are more than priced in at 71.1x 2016 P/E, and his price target is based on 50x 2016 P/E (a discount to film CP peers' target P/E at 60-70x due to low earnings visibility). Download the Complete Report

Barrons : A U.K. Broadcaster Ripe for the Picking

A U.K. Broadcaster Ripe for the Picking
Ad revenue for ITV is growing and production is carrying more of the load. That makes it a valuable asset.

United Kingdom television broadcaster ITV , the company behind programs like Duck Dynasty and Hell’s Kitchen, is sending out all the right signals.

ITV’s shares (ticker: ITV.UK) had a stellar year in 2015, rising 28%. They may not repeat that performance in 2016, but this year could prove to be another productive one.

Net advertising revenues are forecast to show steady growth this year and earnings per share can climb at a double-digit rate. ITV’s shares closed in London on Friday at 2.56 pounds sterling ($3.70), giving the company a market value of £10.52 billion. They could be worth £3.25 in 12 months’ time, suggesting upside of more than 20%.

The stock trades for less than 15 times projected earnings for 2016. It is compelling viewing compared with rivals such as Italy’s Mediaset (MS.Italy), which trades at a multiple of more than 32, and Germany’s ProSiebenSat.1 Media (PSM.Germany), at about 17. ITV has unsponsored American depositary receipts (ITVPY) that were trading in New York on Friday afternoon at $37.33.

London-based ITV is an integrated broadcasting and production company that operates the largest family of free-to-air and pay channels in the U.K. It delivers its content across over 20 platforms, including its Website, via satellite, and through direct content deals with services such as Amazon.com and Netflix.

IN 2014, ITV’S CHANNELS bagged a 22% share of the U.K. television audience and 46% of advertising, which it uses to fund programming. ITV Studios, its content business, is one of the U.K.’s largest production companies, making programs for its own channels and for rivals like the British Broadcasting Corporation. ITV also licenses programs and formats to broadcasters in other countries.

With the U.K. economy expected to grow 2.2% in 2016, a pace similar to last year’s, the outlook for advertising in 2016 is encouraging. ITV’s advertising revenues are forecast to grow 5% this year to £1.83 billion, although they could begin to retreat in 2017 as viewing figures are projected to shrink because of competition from other platforms.

The sales contribution from ITV Studios is increasing along with the demand for content, allowing the broadcaster to slowly reduce its dependence on traditional advertising revenues. ITV Studios’ share of revenues is projected to rise to 28% by 2018 from 25% this year. It has made a string of acquisitions to bolster its offerings.

Investors “should view content production as the most likely source of additional upside in the next few years,” says Bernstein senior analyst Claudio Aspesi, who rates ITV at Outperform with a £3.25 price target.

Another channel for growth could open up if regulations are relaxed. The British free-to-air television market is the most heavily regulated in Western Europe, and Aspesi argues that some of the rules are obsolete in an age of Internet-delivered video. He notes, however, that no changes are imminent and that ITV has learned to operate efficiently within the U.K. guidelines.

ITV also has scope to sharpen its online focus. Its 11% share of online videos served by key streaming TV companies is half that of its linear television audience—that is, viewers of scheduled programming. It will need to boost its online efforts as revenues from television advertising decline. ITV has significantly increased the content it makes available online, a sign that the platform is a key part of its strategy.

ITV IS FORECAST TO EARN £667 million, or 18 pence per share, on revenues of £3.17 billion in 2016, compared with net income of £573 million, or 16 pence a share, on £2.95 billion in revenues last year.

A negligible level of debt—an estimated 0.3 times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization in 2016—means that it can be generous to shareholders. It could pay a special dividend of £250 million this year, which would push the yield close to 5%.

No wonder investors can’t take their eyes off their screens. Mark Slater, co-founder and chief investment officer at London’s Slater Investments, sees an upside between 50% and 75% over the next three years. “ITV is highly cash generative, controls access to a rare mass audience, has a strong and growing content arm, and is not aggressively priced,” says Slater. “It is a strategic asset that many large media companies would like to own.”

ITV’s largest shareholder is U.S. cable tycoon John Malone’s Liberty Global (LBTYA), which has built a 10% stake since 2014. Liberty Global has been accumulating content providers, or at least stakes in them. A price tag of £14 billion to £15 billion isn’t beyond Liberty Global, but it has been busy with other deals, and expectations that it will move on ITV have faded.

A sale of ITV isn’t reason enough for investors to own the shares, but the compelling investment case is a good excuse to tune in.

Barrons : Yardeni: No U.S. Recession in Sight

Yardeni: No U.S. Recession in Sight

Wall Street economist Ed Yardeni is optimistic long-term, but he expects 2016 to be “choppy and difficult.”

Every day, the collegial eight-member team that constitutes Yardeni Research peers into the murk of corporate earnings, indicators, Fed speeches, global capital flows, and market fads, and produces a shrewd, stylish piece of analysis describing what investors ought to expect from stocks. It’s led by Ed Yardeni, 65, who has advised big investors for more than 30 years at a host of Wall Street firms and then as president of the Long Island, N.Y.–based company. The affable Yardeni also pens film reviews for his clients and is fond of comparing movies to real life. Lately, the latter has been more exciting.

Barron’s: What movie best describes the market we’re experiencing today?

The Revenant. Leonardo DiCaprio was outstanding. In one early scene, there was a realistic bear attack on a human. It was painful to watch. That bear should have been nominated for best supporting actor. And in January, the bull was mauled by a bear attack. I got the same churning feeling in my stomach.

Now remind us of the significance of the number 666, which figured prominently in the horror film The Omen as the number of the Beast of Revelation.

In March 2009, I was visiting one of my accounts in Princeton, N.J., and we were all slightly suicidal. The market was horrendous. We were trying to figure out what could turn it around. When I came out of the meeting, a trader walked by and said, “Hey, the S&P just hit 666 and bounced off it.” I thought, what a funny coincidence, that’s the diabolical 666. I really should be a symbologist, like the Tom Hanks character in The Da Vinci Code. A week later, I wrote that 666 might well have been the interim low in the market. Around that time, I was pleased to hear, Congressman Gary Ackerman, along with Barney Frank, strongly encouraged FASB [the Financial Accounting Standards Board] to suspend mark-to-market. The Fed also turned things around by expanding QE1 [the first round of quantitative easing].

This past Jan. 20, I was visiting accounts in Europe and checked into the Radisson Blu at the Zurich Airport. I opened my key card and it said 666. I thought, this is a really bad omen! They should give me another room. But I actually had fond memories from 2009, and so I checked in. That day, the market took another dive, to 1812. That might have been the capitulation. We’ll see, we’ll see.

What’s in the cards for the Standard & Poor’s 500 index?

I started out the year thinking we could get to 2300. Then I cut that to 2150. Now that earnings growth is coming in negative for the fourth quarter, and analysts are projecting another decline for the first quarter, I am lowering my 2016 estimate by $2, to $122 per share for S&P earnings. That’s a growth rate of 3%. So now my target is for 2000 and a second choppy year with lots of motion without going anywhere, because of the strong dollar, because oil continues to fall. I’m sticking with my earnings growth forecast of 5% for 2017, or $128 a share, and a target of 2300 for 2017. Basically, I’m still a secular bull. Clearly, we’ve had a lot of volatility in the 15-to-17 multiple range for the S&P 500. I admit the risks of recession are increasing, but I’m not looking for multiples to dive into the single digits, which they do in recessions. And, for better or worse, central banks will continue what they’ve been doing, in response to the clear, continued slowing in the global economy and the increasing risk of a global recession.

So we should fight the Fed? The other central banks are.

Not fighting the Fed worked very well until last summer, when investors started to question whether the central banks have run out of ammo. The Fed terminated QE in October 2014, and the chatter immediately turned to when they would begin raising rates, which they did in December. You’d think, one measly 25-basis-point [0.25%] increase, what’s the big deal? But they also predicted four rate hikes this year. They got cocky, thinking the economy was on a solid footing. At the end of the day, the most important tool central banks have is credibility, and they will continue what they’ve been doing. European Central Bank President Mario Draghi promised to do [more easing] in March. If you bail out of stocks, your risk is that some major central bank somewhere will do something that makes stocks rally for a while.

The selloff started on Jan. 4, the day before Fed Vice Chair Stanley Fischer said that he was buying into four rate hikes this year. Then John Williams of the Federal Reserve of San Francisco reiterated that he, too, wanted to prepare the markets for four to five rate hikes. But 12 days later, Williams said he’s losing sleep over China causing a global recession that could spill over to the U.S. And now William Dudley of the Fed in New York says the weakening outlook could have significant consequences. Now that Japan has joined the negative interest-rate parade, and Draghi plans something in March, you’ll hear more chatter about waiting before expecting another rate hike.

Will the chatter be right?

I’ll say it again: This year, it’s either one and done, or none and done. Any rate hike would be late in the year, on evidence that the economy is doing well. The 10-year is under 2%. If the Fed backs off, as I think they’re likely to, and Draghi jumps in with more stimulus, I think the 10-year trades between 1.5% to 2.5%.

Here’s the problem. The Fed is focused on just two mandates—the unemployment and inflation rates—but is averse to thinking about the foreign-exchange and global credit markets. They paid no attention to the impact of their ultraeasy policies on emerging markets. They think the soaring dollar and plunging oil prices are transient events, and once they pass, inflation will magically rise back to 2%.

When the dollar is up 22%, it automatically lops 11% off corporate profits because half of S&P 500 earnings come from overseas. It is equivalent to a 100-basis-point increase in the fed-funds rate. They achieved this by preparing the markets for a measly 25-basis-point rate hike. Now we’re starting to see the impact in places like Houston, where office vacancy rates have been rising.

The commodity supercycle bubble started bursting when China slowed significantly around 2014. When the Fed terminated that year, the dollar soared, which pushed commodity prices over the cliff. I think that 1) inflation is dead, 2) globalization killed it, 3) aging demographics are killing it, and 4) major technological disruptions in just about every industry are keeping a lid on it. Easy money has actually propped up supply more than boosted demand, namely in China. Central banks are going to keep interest rates near zero, and even the Fed may change its tune.

Bubbles bursting can cause financial crises. Are we in one?

Maybe because I had a happy childhood, I remain fundamentally optimistic. Last year was choppy and difficult; this year will be choppy and difficult. But the U.S. will come out of this in particularly good stead. We have a more resilient and more diversified economy than others. Clearly, the manufacturing data lately look like recession, and a lot of that is related to energy—30% of the S&P 500’s capital spending is attributable to energy companies, which are slashing spending. But, excluding energy, profits are still growing. The consumer is still growing, but at a slower pace. A lot of jobs are being created in the services economy. Exports will be negative, but fiscal drag is now turning into fiscal stimulus at the federal, state, and local levels.

Paul Ryan, the new speaker of the House, just negotiated a deal between the Democrats and Republicans. It was the same old “I’ll let you increase your spending if you let me increase mine and give me a couple of tax cuts here and there.” So government spending will be positive. And state and local spending has been picking up. The one issue, obviously, is that oil-producing states like Texas and North Dakota may be cutting back.

Look, the risks of global recession outside the U.S. have increased. But if this drags the U.S. into recession, it would be the first time it has happened, a point David Levy made in Barron’s a few weeks ago [“David Levy Forecasts a Global Recession in 2016,” Dec. 19]. I have confidence the U.S. economy will remain resilient enough to grow 2.5% this year.

Once again, we are dependent on the U.S. consumer. We may be in an era of permanently low oil prices, meaning gasoline prices could be at $2 or lower for several years. A couple of years ago, they were $5 in California. The price mechanism is working on the demand side. Global oil demand is rising at a faster rate, which is very encouraging. I think oil is at $30 to $50 for the next five years, which keeps the price of gasoline in most of the U.S. at $2 or less. Americans don’t believe it’s sustainable because they’ve seen the volatility before. I think they’re going to spend it. Wage gains aren’t great, but they’re beating price increases, so real incomes are going up. The service economy is growing; there is discretionary income.

All of which mean good things for stocks, according to you. At least in 2017.

Stocks should do reasonably well. What’s changed is we’re back in a stockpicker’s market. You can’t just buy any dividend-yielding stock anymore or any growth stock. Companies that can beat average revenue and earnings growth will be highly prized. Industry analysts are expecting a year-on-year decline in the current quarter, but I still expect profits to recover. If the Fed doesn’t give us four rate hikes, we may be close to a peak in the dollar and a bottoming in commodity prices, not in a V-shaped recovery, but an L-shaped formation. Once things calm down, most U.S. companies will benefit from this era, which could be a prolonged five-year period.

Where can investors make money?

During this bull market, there are two broad alternative themes: going global or staying home. We’ve been recommending staying at home all along, and it hasn’t always been comfortable. Stay at home means health-care stocks. The pricing side has been attacked by politicians. Once the elections are behind us, I think they will be outperformers.

Do you mean hospitals? Pharma? Devices? Biotech?

I am talking across the board. The demographics for health care are so extraordinarily bullish. Health care is one of the most backward sectors in terms of using technology, and that’s changing rapidly. They are increasing productivity across the board. The consumer will benefit from the weakness in commodity prices, the continuing shift from manufacturing to services, and, increasingly, to the very rapidly growing knowledge economy. So anything related to consumer entertainment services—movies, theme parks, hotels, resorts—are all going to be profitable, with good growth prospects. We’re clearly seeing some consolidation in the hotels in response to Airbnb.

In tech, some of the FANGs [ Facebook (ticker: FB), Amazon.com (AMZN), Netflix (NFLX), and Google, now Alphabet (GOOGL)] have been defanged this year. But they’re companies that can generate growth and have billions in cash to figure it all out. I don’t do individual stocks, but we just saw Apple [AAPL] trip up, Facebook doing really well, and Amazon going the other way. Social media and Internet retailing should continue to be strong growers. And high-yield is very speculative, even if you can get a lot more yield now. So I’m not telling anybody to load up on that.

Who will win the presidential election?

It is too hard to call. All the lead players are quirky and vulnerable to tripping over their own feet. I’m rooting that gridlock will be the winner, given the pathetic leadership shown by both parties. The White House may not matter as much as the Fed. If the Fed backs off from raising rates this year, the secular bull market should prevail.

What about the Oscars?

Leo DiCaprio for The Revenant, Brie Larson for Room, and Spotlight for Best Picture.

Barrons : Here Comes $20 Oil

Here Comes $20 Oil

Oil could fall as low as $20 a barrel in the first half of this year, recovering to $55 by year end. That could help drive stocks, which have closely followed oil prices, much higher.

Oil bulls, take heart. The last leg of the bear market that began in mid-2014 is probably in sight, as marginal producers fall by the wayside. Supply cutbacks should bring a rebound in the price of crude by the second half of 2016.

But before a rebound, West Texas Intermediate crude will probably continue to fall, perhaps as low as $20 a barrel, before vaulting to the mid-$50s by year end.

Stock market investors can also take heart. The stock indexes have been closely correlated with oil of late, moving up or (mostly) down, as the price of crude has gyrated. This perverse pattern has persisted even though the overwhelming majority of global companies benefit from cheaper crude, since they buy the refined products to help run their operations.

It’s true that many oil exporters are in emerging market economies, and low oil prices have slowed their economic growth and put a dent in their sovereign wealth funds. Beyond this, stock traders may be subscribing to the misguided belief that low oil prices are signaling imminent global recession.

Our expected recovery in crude by the second half of this year will, therefore, probably bring a recovery in equities. And perhaps even before then, stock traders might wake up to the fact that the bear market in oil has mainly been reflecting a world awash in black gold.

While global weakness on the demand side has played a part in the buildup of excess supply, it has been weakness in the rate of growth, not an outright economic contraction. A further slowdown in global growth, especially from China, will also play a role, but here again, the supply side will dominate, as cutbacks in production bring a rebound in prices.

Barron’s predicted $75 oil in late March of 2014, when crude was trading above $100. But the market soon overshot our contrarian forecast, as the slowdown in global growth curbed the growth in demand. We followed up on that story repeatedly, lowering our sights to $20 a barrel a year ago (see chart below).

WORLD CONSUMPTION OF OIL has held up relatively well. It rose in 2014 to 92.8 million barrels a day from 2013’s 91.9 million, a below-par increase of just 0.9 million barrels. Consumption in 2015 rose to 94.5 million, for a relatively substantial rise from 2014. But, of course, that was due mainly to the price plunge that made oil dirt cheap.

For 2016, in no small part because of the expected economic slowdown in China, Citigroup’s senior energy analyst Eric Lee projects below-par oil demand growth of one million barrels a day, to 95.5 million.

The supply side, then, has been the main driver of the oversupply that has wrought the bear market. And nowhere has the supply-side revolution been more dramatic than in the U.S. As recently as 2010, the U.S. produced 5.5 million barrels a day of oil. Due to the advent of hydraulic fracturing, or fracking—the extraction of oil from shale—production jumped to 8.7 million by 2014. In 2015, production set another record, at 9.7 million.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia, long the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries’ swing producer, has recognized that it is powerless to control the market, and has simply produced at full tilt, with the aim of earning as much as it can. Russia, too, was able to increase production last year, in part because the collapse of the ruble against the dollar meant that it earned more rubles by selling oil for dollars, despite the collapse in the dollar-denominated oil price.

The worldwide oversupply of oil is evident from the buildup of inventories. Storage-tank capacity outside the U.S. is virtually exhausted. Edward Morse, head of global commodity research at Citigroup, who was cited in our first story, says that warm weather in December caused a buildup of heating-oil supplies in Europe that is being stored on ships, since there’s nowhere else to put the stuff.

The U.S. is virtually the only nation remaining with storage space left. And even here, as the Energy Information Administration reported last week, “at 502.7 million barrels, U.S. crude-oil inventories remain near levels not seen for this time of year in at least the last 80 years.” That figure of more than 500 million excludes the crude held by the U.S. government in its Strategic Petroleum Reserve, at nearly 700 million barrels.

The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is an anachronistic throwback to a time when energy insecurity might have been justified. Also anachronistic: federal restrictions that were long imposed on the U.S. export of oil.

This is no time to start selling the Strategic Reserve, however nonstrategic it has become, but export restrictions were finally lifted by Congress in December. That’s a sensible move, although one that should bear fruit only over the long run. For the time being, the market abroad for crude would seem to be close to saturated.

The chart above page reflects the likely trajectory, as seen by Citigroup’s Morse and Lee. As fundamental analysts, they project the price in quarterly averages; Barron’s has interpolated monthly prices that are consistent with these averages.

Also providing key insight: Steve Briese, publisher and writer of the Bullish Review of Commodity Insiders newsletter, who has frequently been cited by Barron’s.

The price decline in January to an average of $31.70 from $37.20 in December—punctuated by a low of $26.68 touched on Jan. 20—resulted from four factors: clear signals from China that growth of this powerhouse economy was slowing, thus curbing demand; mild winter weather, which caused a huge buildup of heating-oil stocks that the Europeans had to store on ships; investors shorting the market on the expected lifting of sanctions on Iranian exports; and the usual seasonal pullback in January of refinery utilization after the seasonal drawdown in December.

As Morse points out, “The only entities in the world that actually consume crude oil are refineries.” A price rebound in February and March is expected, due to the return of refinery demand and to the typical winter pattern of prices rising with the colder weather in February and March.

Briese cites a key indicator that affirms this constructive view of the next two months. He pays close attention to the Commitments of Traders Report released weekly by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The report tracks the long and short positions in futures and options on WTI traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange. This derivatives market is used by refiners that would naturally take long positions to hedge against a price rise, and producers who would take short positions to hedge against a price decline.

Briese long ago found strong evidence that in this, as in most other commodity futures and options markets, “commercials” as a group do not hedge by rote. Rather, they trade strategically—generally against the price trend.

As of Feb. 2, the most recent date for which figures are available, the net-short position—longs minus shorts—was 270,008 contracts. Since commercials as a group are almost always net short, the key point for Briese is this net-short position was at the low end of the historical range. For example, in June 2014, at the market’s last price peak, the commercials’ net-short position came to 512,853.

The fact that, at 270,008, the net-short position of the commercials was relatively low is a signal for Briese that the “smart money” is optimistic on the oil price—but only mildly positive. For example, in December 2008, at the market’s last price bottom, the commercials’ net-short position was even lower, at 99,753 contracts, which signaled an even bigger vote for a price rebound.

For the second quarter, Morse anticipates a return to price weakness based on two key factors: a larger refinery-maintenance period worldwide, particularly in the U.S., and especially in April, which will bring a pullback in demand, and the expectation that by April, Iranian production will have a noticeable effect on supply.

From Briese’s perspective, this could set the stage for the $20 capitulation low he has long been expecting, and which Barron’s has cited several times. As of Feb. 2, the large speculators held a huge long-only position of 579,266 contracts, nearly 36% of all the open positions in crude held on Nymex. As the fundamentals start to weigh on the price, forced liquidation of this long position could briefly push the price as low as $20.

Citigroup’s Lee also foresees an interim scenario for $20 oil driven by supply/demand fundamentals. As he points out, if storage supplies build up to the point that no capacity is left, even in the U.S., then any production that comes on-stream would have to be sold immediately. Such distress sales could mean that prices briefly drop below $20.

BUT BY THE SECOND HALF, the bull market will return. “We think,” says Morse, “that the world is poised to lose a lot of oil production in the U.S., Colombia, Mexico, Venezuela, China, and then potentially in Russia, Brazil, and the United Kingdom sector of the North Sea.”

Russia is in a bind, he explains. The government has a dwindling amount of hard-currency reserves. So unless it decides to spend those reserves down to nothing, it will need to raise taxes, and likely targets are the oil and gas companies. The companies will therefore be forced to reduce their production, thus partially killing the golden goose that has been Russia’s main source of hard currency. And because of financial sanctions on Russia, the companies have no ability to borrow.

Morse projects a $50 average price in the fourth quarter, from which Barron’s extrapolates $55 by December. As a sign of how much the environment has changed, note that when we predicted $75 oil in March 2014, it was an outrageously bearish prediction. A $55 prediction now looks quite bullish.

As the nearby chart shows, the price of crude really does influence the price of gasoline, although not one-for-one, since the price of the refined product has other costs built into it that are relatively fixed, especially labor costs. When the WTI price was at $105 per barrel, the gasoline price averaged $3.70 a gallon; at $55, the price at the pump should run $2.50 a gallon.

As noted in our first bearish story predicting $75 oil, over the past five years, the world has found a trillion extra barrels of oil—the equivalent of 30 years of extra supply—with a third of it coming from shale, a third from deep water, and a third from oil sands. Over the past year, the costs of recovery from these sources has noticeably fallen. A return to triple-digit prices on crude oil is unlikely for the foreseeable future.

Barron's Saturday summary: Cover predicts oil could drop to $20/bbl and then reb

Barron's Saturday summary: Cover predicts oil could drop to $20/bbl and then rebound sharply; positive on CELG, GILD 

Cover story: "Oil could fall as low as $20 a barrel in the first half of this year, recovering to $55 by year end. That could help drive stocks, which have closely followed oil prices, much higher"; Stock traders "may be subscribing to the misguided belief that low oil prices are signaling imminent global recession." 

Features: 1) The Barron's/Lipper Fund Family ranking for 2015 is topped by Sit Investment Associates, Eaton Vance, and Thrivent Financial; 2) Positive on CELG, GILD: Companies rely on a few closely related medicines for the bulk of their income, but they are profitable and the recent drop in the sector creates a buying opportunity; shares of each could trade 30% higher during the next year; 3) Kevin Kaiser of Hedgeeye, whose short bets on KMI, LINE, and CHK have paid off, says the worst may not be over for master limited partnerships, which continue to face a number of challenges. 

Technology Trader: The plunge in tech shares such as CRM, WDAY, and NOW shows that cloud-computing companies aren't immune to macroeconomic conditions, which are weighing on corporate budgets, though even after Friday's drubbing their shares remain high; Cautious on INFN, ANET, FNSR, CIEN, AVGO: It's unclear whether companies that supply the infrastructure for cloud computing will suffer as the market loses faith in that sector's growth. 

Tech Trader: Non-cyclical companies, including staples and utilities, are on track to show 4.3% earnings growth this year, and domestic companies are vastly outperforming international ones; Cautious on CHD: Maker of Arm & Hammer and other consumer brands is vulnerable to competitive pressure in its core markets from rivals such as PG, and share remain pricey; Positive on TMO: Shares of world's largest scientific equipment maker are down, but a boom in research funding and smart acquisitions could lift them 25% in the next year.

Interview: Ed Yardeni of Yardeni Research says the Fed "is focused on just two mandates-the unemployment and inflation rates-but is averse to thinking about foreign exchange and global credit markets." 

Profile: Raman Srivastava, portfolio manager, Dreyfus/Standish Global Fixed Income fund, which has benefited from a hefty weighting of developed-country government bonds and a low quotient of riskier high-yield and emerging-market bonds (top 10 government bond holdings: Australia 2018, Italy 2024, Australia 2025, Japan 2044, Canada 2024, Australia 2019, Italy 2019, Korea 2025, Australia 2024, Germany 2046). 

Small Caps: Positive on TOWN, SBCF: Though shares are down, small banks are benefiting from industry consolidation, and with a rebound their stock should generate healthy returns. 

Follow-Up: Positive on AMZN: Share price "looks reasonable relative to the profits analysts expect Amazon to make by the end of the decade"; Cautious on GPRO: Barron's continues its contrarian stance on the camera maker; an acquisition by AAPL is unlikely, but SNE or UA could bite, though there's a good change once acquired the brand would cease to exist; Positive on VNTV: Payment processor should continue to benefit as more merchants embrace the EMV standard, and shares could have 15% upside. 

European Trader: Positive on ITV: London-based broadcaster should see increased ad revenue, and it has several potential avenues for growth; EPS could climb this year at a double-digit rate. 

Asian Trader: Hong Kong continues to face problems, and as a global financial center, it imports volatility from the U.S. and China, two largely uncorrelated stock markets. 

Emerging Markets: Argentina's problems are far from over, but reform-minded president Mauricio Macri has devalued the peso, cut energy subsidies, and secured financing to reduce the deficit. 

Commodities: Cocoa has fallen this year amid the general drop in commodities, though it managed to buck the trend until last year's third quarter, and any rebound is likely to be small. 

Streetwise: Chinese companies can't make acquisitions in "strategic" U.S. industries, but there are still a wide range of options; potential targets include JOY, TRN, GBX, EMR.

>>> Weekly Update

Weekly Market Update: Markets Reprice Fed Policy Forecasts


After two weeks of moves sideways or higher, most global equity markets resumed the downtrend seen in early January. The big exception was the suspiciously calm Shanghai Composite, which eked out a modest gain ahead of China's Lunar New Year holiday week and was much less volatile than in recent weeks. With central bank largess pacifying most of Europe and Asia, concern about the US played a central role. The dollar saw its biggest weekly decline against the index since 2009, while US treasuries rallied and the 10-year UST yield sank as low as 1.790% on Wednesday, its lowest level since last February and within half a percentage point of the record low of 1.380% seen in 2012. Analysts reoriented their forecasts on Fed policy moves, with many suggesting only one or two rate hikes may be possible this year. Lower interest rates slammed US banks, as shares of a raft of major US financials hit 52-week lows. Commodity prices broadly lifted outside of energy, on the outlook for lower rates allowing the beaten down global materials stocks to enjoy a modest rebound. Gold moved back above the 200-day moving average for the first time since November while the mining stocks saw big outperformance. Weak earnings results from many oil and tech names provided no relief and for the week the DJIA lost 1.6%, the S&P fell 1.3%, and the Nasdaq plunged 5.4%.

Markets recalibrated their outlook for Fed monetary policy this week, helping to weaken the greenback. In a note published on Tuesday, Goldman Sachs pushed its forecast for the next Fed interest rate hike out to June from March, and lowered its view for the number of increases this year to three from four. On Wednesday, New York Fed Governor Dudley acknowledged that conditions were worse now than they were in December when the FOMC delivered its first rate hike, but also stated the FOMC was not ready to draw very many conclusions about policy right now. Dudley's cautious comments about the strong dollar also helped momentum. The closely-watched dollar index fell more than 3% on the week and gave up all its gains since late October. EUR/USD climbed more than three big figures on the week - rising from 1.0850 to around 1.1200 - putting the dollar at its weakest level against the euro since last fall, when the ECB began hinting about additional QE measures and tanked the single currency.

Key US January data raised tough questions about the state of the domestic economy. The ISM manufacturing PMI remained in contraction territory for the third month in row, while the employment component dropped to its lowest level since June 2009 (45.9 vs 48.0). Services PMIs deteriorated, with the Markit reading dropping to its lowest point in the series in 27 months and the ISM data at its weakest since March 2014. The January US jobs report was a mixed bag: the nonfarm figure was +151K, well below expectations and the weakest total since the +149K gain in September, while the December nonfarm figure was revised down by 10% to 262K. On the other hand, unemployment declined to 4.9%, pushing the economy even closer to full employment. Hourly earnings were materially higher, giving the Fed some of the wage inflation it has been looking for.

Global interest rates descended after the Bank of Japan's move to negative interest rates late last week. Two-year yields fell to -0.5% in Germany and -0.2% in Japan, where the 10-year yield touched 0.025%. The sugar high felt by the yen wore off quickly, as USD/JPY dropped back to the 116-118 area it had been occupying in the weeks leading up to the BoJ decision, off the 121.50 area. BoJ Governor Kuroda spoke extensively about last week's decision, stating that just because negative rates were adopted it does not mean the bank is out of ammunition to expand asset buying. Kuroda said he is still concerned that inflation expectations will weaken in medium term, but for now saw the economy recovering moderately. He reiterated the BoJ is prepared to push further into negative rates, if necessary.

Crude prices were volatile this week, and despite the snapback on dollar weakness remained below last week's highs. Coming into the week, prices dipped on the weak China manufacturing numbers and a round of denials that an emergency OPEC meeting would be taking place. WTI sank around 11% to below $29.50 and Brent dropped 10% to $32.30 on Monday and Tuesday as hopes for coordinated production cuts were crushed. OPEC and Russia January production reports showed modest growth in output, further pressuring prices. Russia pumped the equivalent of 18.9M bpd, +1.5% y/y, a post-Soviet record. The plummeting dollar revived prices briefly, but both contracts were well off their highs as the week drew to a close, with Brent around $34/bbland WTI below $31/bbl.

After the market volatility last August and this January, China's FX reserve levels have become a point of concern for broader markets. The December data showed the biggest monthly decline on record in Chinese reserves. For 2015 overall, reserved declined $513B, the biggest annual drop ever. The January report drops over the weekend, and expectations are for another record drop by more than $100 billion, to a total of $3.2 trillion. While this number is almost unimaginably huge, some analysts suggested that markets would start to worry if the total dropped to $2.8 billion or less, as the PBoC could be forced to let the yuan slide lower with dramatic consequences. Needless to say, the softer dollar gave the Chinese breathing room in their struggle to manage the yuan this week.

The BoE's Monetary Policy Committee returned to unanimity for the first time since last July, voting 9-0 to keep interest rates on hold at record lows. McCafferty, the MPC's only real hawk, switched his vote to the majority and conceded to the data, noting that the pick-up in wage growth has been more muted than expected. And while the committee also cut its economic growth outlook over global growth concerns, it also stated that a rate hike would be more likely than not over the forecast period. At his press conference, Governor Carney said the committee did not discuss negative interest rates and reiterated that the whole MPC believes the next rate move likely higher, not lower. Cable leaped to one-month highs after the decision, testing briefly above 1.4650 before dropping to 1.4470 on Friday.

The Q4 earnings season is in full bloom but results have not been a boon for the equity markets. Results in the tech sector included some notable disappointments. GoPro sales bombed during the holiday quarter and guidance was even worse as management said they would need the next quarter to clear out excess inventory. Executives promised a simplified product line and a focus on developing better software would improve the user experience and future results. Renewing a commitment to long term thinking, they also said they would no longer give quarterly guidance. Yahoo reported another lackluster quarter, and CEO Meyer announced her latest underwhelming turnaround plan. She confirmed reports that the board would review alternatives for the core internet business, but gave every indication that she is not in favor of the idea. On Friday, shares of LinkedIn traded down 40% after earnings and very weak guidance caused analysts reconsider their valuation of the stock.

Among the most notable earnings out this week were results from the global oil majors. BP's fourth-quarter earnings plunged 91% y/y, with its key "underlying replacement cost profit" metric falling to $196 million from $2.2 billion. For 2015, BP saw an annual loss of $5.2 billion compared with a profit of $8.1 billion a year earlier, worse than the $4.9 billion loss in 2010, when BP was battered with write-downs and charges related to the Gulf oil spill. Exxon's quarterly results were better than expected, although profits fell more than 50% y/y and revenue was down sharply. ConocoPhillips bent under balance sheet pressure, slashing its dividend by 66% after its net losses steepened dramatically on a y/y basis. Royal Dutch Shell saw its profits cut in half y/y, while revenue fell slightly less than 50%, although its preliminary report two weeks ago prepared markets for the slump. Norway's Statoil saw profits shrink 44% y/y.

In deal news, Abbott agreed to pay $56/share in cash to acquire over-the-counter testing kit firm, Alere. The offer represented a huge premium of more than 50% over Alere's prior closing stock price. The total deal is valued around $5.8 billion. Just two weeks after News Corp quashed rumors it was pursuing Twitter, new reports circulated that private equity firms were working on a deal to take Twitter private. Six months after Syngenta said no to a $47 billion takeover attempt from Monsanto, the Swiss ag firm has said yes to a $43 billion offer from state-owned China National Chemical Corporation. The transaction would be the largest acquisition of a foreign company by a Chinese business and the latest in a string of deals by the company, known as ChemChina.

>>> US Close Dow-1.29% S&P-1.85% Nasdaq-3.25% Russell-2.87%

Closing Market Summary: Indices End Week Under Pressure

The major averages ended the final session of the week under heavy selling pressure as the health of the U.S. economy and its ability to sustain further fed funds rate hikes remained in focus following the release of the January Employment Situation Report. The report contained diverging metrics that showed weaker than expected job growth but stronger than expected wage growth. Additionally, the data showed that the unemployment rate fell to an eight-year low of 4.9%. The Nasdaq Composite (-3.3%) finished behind both the S&P 500 (-1.9%) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-1.3%).

Other contributing headwinds to today's session included:

  • A reversal in the dollar that weighed on oil
  • A lack of leadership from market cornerstones; and
  • Weaker than expected earnings results

Overnight sessions and futures were fairly restrained as global markets awaited the U.S. Nonfarm Payrolls report. Participants found the report disjointed with misses on headline metrics but positive growth from other benchmarks. For instance, both nonfarm payroll and private sector payroll numbers grew less than expected, but the unemployment rate dropped to 4.9%. Furthermore, hourly earnings rose 0.5% showing potential for an uptick in inflation. This disconnect between data points fueled anxiety over the health of the economy and increased speculation regarding future rate increases.

Countercyclical telecom services (+0.8%) and utilities (+0.3%) were able to end the day in positive territory while heavyweight sectors like technology (-3.4%) consumer discretionary (-3.2%) and health care (-2.0%) finished on the bottom of the leaderboard.

In the top-weighted technology space, large-cap constituents showed relative weakness with Facebook (FB 104.06, -6.42), Alphabet (GOOGL 703.76, -26.27), and Microsoft (MSFT 50.16, -1.84) declining between 3.5% and 5.8%. Elsewhere, LinkedIn (LNKD 108.38, -83.90) plunged 46.6% after below consensus guidance overshadowed a bottom line beat. The high-beta chipmakers showed relative weakness, evidenced by the 3.5% decline in the PHLX Semiconductor Index. Component Qorvo (QRVO 37.25, -1.53) underperformed in the sub-group after issuing below-consensus guidance.

Discretionary component Amazon (AMZN 502.13, -34.13) saw continued weakness, falling 6.4%. The stock has surrendered 20.5% since reporting its Q4 earnings on January 28th. Netflix (NFLX 82.79, -6.92) also extended its recent slide, diving 7.7%.

The commodity-sensitive energy space was hurt by falling oil prices as dollar strength weighed on the commodity and sector. WTI crude ended its pit session down 2.4% at $30.87/bbl. ConocoPhillips (COP 32.90, -2.42) extended its post-earnings losing streak as it declined 6.9%, registering its second consecutive loss after cutting its dividend.

Biotechnology showed relative weakness, evidenced by the 3.2% decline in the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB 256.24, -8.45). To be fair though, large-cap health care names Johnson & Johnson (JNJ 100.54, -3.36) and AbbVie (ABBV 53.12, -3.64) did not fare any better with respective declines of 3.2% and 6.4%.

Today's participation was above the recent average with more than 1.1 billion shares changing hands at the NYSE floor. 

Treasuries fell to their lows after the release of January's Employment Situation Report but eventually inched higher even as the sell off in equities continued. The yield on the 10-yr note ended its day higher by one basis point at 1.85%. 

Today's economic data included the January Nonfarm Payrolls report, December's Trade Balance, and Consumer Credit for December.

  • Nonfarm payrolls increased by 151,000 (consensus 188,000)
    • December nonfarm payrolls revised to 262,000 from 292,000
    • November nonfarm payrolls revised to 280,000 from 252,000
  • Private sector payrolls increased by 158,000 (consensus 183,000)
    • December private sector payrolls revised to 251,000 from 275,000
    • November private sector payrolls revised to 279,000 from 240,000
  • Unemployment rate was 4.9% (consensus 5.0%) versus 5.0% in December
    • The U6 unemployment rate, which accounts for the total unemployed plus persons marginally attached to the labor force and the underemployed, was unchanged at 9.9%
    • Persons unemployed for 27 weeks or more accounted for 26.9% of the unemployed versus 26.3% in December
  • January average hourly earnings were up 0.5% (consensus 0.3%) after increasing x% in December
    • Over the last 12 months, average hourly earnings have risen 2.5% versus 2.5% in December
    • Aggregate earnings were up 0.9%, which should be a positive portent for consumer spending
  • The average workweek was up 0.1 to 34.6 hours (consensus 34.5)
    • January manufacturing workweek was up 0.1 hours to 40.7 hours
    • Factory overtime was unchanged at 3.3 hours
  • The labor force participation rate was 62.7% versus 62.6% in December
  • The December trade deficit widened to $43.4 billion from an upwardly revised deficit of $42.2 bln (from $42.4 bln) for November (consensus estimate of -$43.5 billion).
    • The widening in the deficit was owed to imports increasing by $0.6 billion from November to $224.9 billion in December and exports decreasing by $0.5 billion to $181.5 billion.
    • On a year-over-year basis, exports were down 6.9% while imports were down 6.5%. December marked the 12th straight month that exports have declined on a year-over-year basis. Imports have declined year-over-year for the last nine months.
    • For 2015, the goods and services deficit increased by $23.2 billion to $531.5 billion with exports decreasing $112.9 billion to $2,230.3 billion and imports falling $89.7 billion to $2761.8 billion.
    • The real trade deficit averaged $60.2 billion in the fourth quarter versus $58.8 billion in the third quarter. That increase helps explain the negative contribution net exports had on fourth quarter GDP.
  • The Consumer Credit report for December showed an increase of $21.27 billion (consensus$16.50 billion). November's credit growth was revised higher to $14.02 billion from $13.95 billion.

Investors will not receive any economic data on Monday. 

  • Russell 2000 -13.1% YTD
  • Nasdaq  -12.9% YTD
  • S&P 500 -8.0% YTD 
  • Dow Jones -7.0% YTD