>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 6th of April 2016

>>> Up
*BIOMERIEUX RAISED TO OUTPERFORM VS NEUTRAL AT EXANE
*CRH RAISED TO OVERWEIGHT VS NEUTRAL AT JPMORGAN
*ELECTROCOMPONENTS RAISED TO NEUTRAL AT CREDIT SUISSE
*NORDEA BANK RAISED TO OVERWEIGHT AT BARCLAYS
*TELEFONICA RAISED TO NEUTRAL VS UNDERPERFORM AT CREDIT SUISSE (Full note attached)

>>> Down
*ABB CUT TO SECTOR PERFORM AT RBC CAPITAL
*BOUYGUES CUT TO ADD VS BUY AT ALPHAVALUE
*GN STORE NORD CUT TO NEUTRAL VS BUY AT BOFAML
*GULF MARINE SERVICES CUT TO NEUTRAL VS OVEREIGHT AT JPMORGAN
*HEIDELBERGCEMENT CUT TO NEUTRAL AT JPMORGAN
*HERA CUT TO SELL VS NEUTRAL AT CITI
*LAFARGEHOLCIM CUT TO REDUCE AT HSBC
*ROTORK CUT TO UNDERWEIGHT VS EQUALWEIGHT AT MORGAN STANLEY
*TURKCELL CUT TO NEUTRAL VS OVERWEIGHT AT JPMORGAN

>>> PT Change
*MONEYSUPERMARKET REITERATE OUTPERFORM AT CREDIT SUISSE, PT RAISED FROM 350p to 400p (Full note attached)

>>> Initiation
*EUROCASTLE RATED NEW OUTPERFORM AT CREDIT SUISSE; PT EU10
*IMIMOBILE RATED NEW BUY AT INVESTEC, PT 210P
*KLEPIERRE RATED NEW EQUALWEIGHT AT BARCLAYS, PT EU40.6
*UNIBAIL-RODAMCO RATED NEW UNDERWEIGHT AT BARCLAYS, PT EU220

>>> Call
>> Stock
*ANIMA, EI TOWERS, IREN SET AS NEW LONGS AT MEDIOBANCA
*CERVED, POSTE, SARAS REMOVED FROM LONG STOCKS AT MEDIOBANCA
*WARTSILA ADDED TO HSBC EUROPE SUPER 10 PORTFOLIO
*UBI SET AS NEW SHORT AT MEDIOBANCA, REPLACING FERRAGAMO

(CS) Telefonica - Upgraded from Underperform to Neutral

* Investment Case: We remain around eu500m below consensus EBITDA forecasts for Telefonica. We expect Telefonica Brasil growth to continue to deteriorate as the Brasil telecoms market weakens, due to continued GDP erosion and pricing pressure (including cheaper x-net calls). We also continue to assume some drag on FX rates from inflation in Argentina and Venezuela. These negatives offset the recovery in GEM FX rates and Telefonica Spain growth.

* However, we continue to believe the 3-O2UK deal is likely to complete. This has gone from being a consensus view to a bull-case as the deal deadline approaches. With CKH motivated to complete the deal – the only way to achieve significant scale after trying to grow 3UK organically for 13 years – and several keen remedy-takers (e.g. Virgin, Sky, TalkTalk) we expect 3UK to be able to create the remedies required for the EC to agree the deal. The deal would transform Telefonica's balance sheet and see it returning some of the deal proceeds to shareholders through a return to a 75c cash dividend, a c 8% dividend yield at current price. Equally, a failure of the deal would have little or no downside to the current Telefonica share price (in our view), with the agreed sale price relatively low at 6.6x, other means to secure an investment grade rating without issuing shares and a continued 35c cash dividend giving a 4% yield in line with the sector. Given this skew, and our view that the deal will probably complete, we upgrade Telefonica to Neutral.

* Valuation: Telefonica trades at a premium on EV/EBITDA but a discount on equity FCF yield, due to a relatively cheap FTTH build in Spain.

WSJ : Daimler Confirms Microsoft, Amazon in Talks to Invest in HERE Location Ser


Daimler Confirms Microsoft, Amazon in Talks to Invest in HERE Location Service

Tech giants could provide cloud, data services for platform

BERLIN—Germany’s premium car makers Audi AG, BMW AG and Daimler AG, which owns Mercedes-Benz, are in talks with Amazon.com Inc. and Microsoft Corp. that could lead to the tech giants taking minority stakes in the HERE digital mapping service, a senior Daimler executive said.

The three auto makers, which make the world’s leading premium car brands, acquired the Berlin-based digital mapping service HERE from Nokia Corp. last year for €2.5 billion ($2.85 billion) as part of a bold plan to build a platform for self-driving cars connected to the Internet.

Soon after taking control of HERE, the car makers began approaching tech firms and other auto makers about joining the venture as strategic investors.

“We are talking to Amazon, Microsoft and many auto makers,” Thomas Weber, a Daimler board member in charge of research and development, said in an interview late Tuesday. “We need a cloud provider to handle the huge amounts of data created by HERE and its users. We haven’t taken any decisions yet.”

Should a deal be concluded, which isn’t certain, it would be a major step in creating a global platform for connected cars that links the engineering prowess of some of the industry’s top auto makers and information technology know-how of Silicon Valley.

Amazon and Microsoft could be natural allies for HERE as both compete against Google in information services. German auto makers have been wary of allowing Google to get too deep inside their vehicles, fearing that they could lose control of data produced by the car and its users and sacrifice potential profits.

“We’ve always said that we wanted to protect our independence,” Mr. Weber said.

Mr. Weber said talks were still at an early stage and that a decision about opening the digital mapping service to new investors would likely be taken sometime this year.

HERE’s other investors—Audi and BMW—acknowledged talks with a variety of potential investors but declined to comment on specifics.

Max-Morten Borgmann, a spokesman for BMW, said HERE’s consortium of investors always made clear they were interested in bringing in additional partners and that they wanted to reduce their own investment in the company.

“We have determined that there is a lot of interest in this, not only from potential partners in the automobile industry but also from interested parties in other industries,” he said in an emailed statement, declining to elaborate.

Amazon wasn’t immediately available for comment.

HERE and Microsoft declined to comment.

HERE is developing a high-definition, real-time map that is seen as a key component to wide deployment of self-driving cars and connecting individual vehicles to each other and the Internet.

HERE is more than a conventional route-finding or navigation service. The company is creating a high-definition, 3-D digital representation of roads, highways and their surroundings that is constantly updated as cars connected to the service upload data about traffic, weather and road conditions to the cloud in real time. That information then becomes available in real time for other drivers.

Cars traveling in winter, for example, could provide information about temperature and road conditions that could be shared through the cloud with drivers coming up behind them, potentially improving road safety. The service could also alert drivers to sudden changes on the road, such as new construction or even accidents that a static route-finding map wouldn't contain.

The ability to provide information about changing traffic and road conditions in real-time is seen as a necessary step to develop self-driving cars.

Amazon and or Microsoft could enhance HERE’s service by providing cloud services and big data analytics, needed to process the huge amounts of data and transform that data into a basis for profitable data-based services.

Mr. Weber said HERE’s owners are also eager to have more car makers on board as a way of enhancing the accuracy of HERE’s service. The more cars uploading data to HERE’s cloud, the more accurate HERE’s location services become. That is why HERE wants to have more big auto manufacturers locked in as investors to increase the number of cars on the road that feed data to its cloud.

“In the future, we don’t only want to utilize data that HERE produces, but also data that is created by customers,” Mr. Weber said.

Earlier this year, Renault SA, the French car maker, and auto supplier Continental AG said they were considering joining HERE as strategic investors. Continental’s rival Robert Bosch GmbH formed a strategic partnership with HERE competitor TomTom NV, the Dutch mapping service considered No. 3 after HERE and Google Maps.

>>> Asian Update

Asian Market Update: China Services PMI recovers despite soft employment component; Japan govt officials clash over state of economy as Yen continues

***Economic Data***
- (CN) CHINA MAR CAIXIN PMI SERVICES: 52.2 V 51.2 PRIOR; Composite: 51.3 v 49.4 prior; 11-month high
- (HK) HONG KONG MAR COMPOSITE PMI: 45.5 V 46.4 PRIOR; 13th straight contraction; 7-month low
- (NZ) NEW ZEALAND MAR QV HOUSE PRICES Y/Y: 11.4% V 11.6% PRIOR
- (UK) MAR BRC SHOP PRICE INDEX Y/Y: -1.7% V -2.0% PRIOR; 35TH STRAIGHT DECLINE

***Index Snapshot (as of 04:00 GMT)***
- Nikkei225 +0.2%, S&P/ASX +0.7%, Kospi +0.4%, Shanghai Composite +0.1%, Hang Seng +0.4%, Jun S&P500 +0.5% at 2,049

***Commodities/Fixed Income***
- Apr gold +0.1% at $1,231/oz, May crude oil +2.7% at $36.85/brl, May copper +0.2% at $2.15/lb
- (NZ) Fonterra Global Dairy Trade auction: Dairy Trade price index: +2.1% v -2.9% prior; biggest increase in 4 months
- (US) Weekly API Oil Inventories: Crude: -4.3M v +2.6M prior; first draw in 7 weeks
- GLD: SPDR Gold Trust ETF daily holdings fall 0.3 tonnes to 815.4 tonnes; 5th straight decline; lowest since Mar 19th
- SLV: iShares Silver Trust ETF daily holdings rise to 10,411 tonnes from 10,378 tonnes prior; Highest since Dec 2014
- (EC) Ecuador President: Latin America oil producers to meet on Apr 8th to discuss an oil output freeze - financial press
- USD/CNY: (CN) PBOC SETS YUAN MID POINT AT 6.4754 V 6.4663 PRIOR; 2nd straight weaker setting
- (CN) PBOC to inject CNY30B in 7-day reverse repos
- (JP) BOJ offers to buy ¥350B in 1-3yr JGBs, ¥440B in 3-5yr JGBs, ¥450B in 5-10yr JGBs
- (AU) Australia MoF (AOFM) sells A$900M in 4.25% 2026 Bonds; avg yield: 2.435%; bid-to-cover: 2.56x

***Market Focal Points/FX***
- Asian equity markets are modestly higher despite broader selling on Wall St, with more benign China data and a rebound in oil helping to slow the recent skid. Australia is outperforming, led by the energy sector, while the rally in Tokyo is slightly more subdued amid continued volatility in the Yen. Overnight, USD/JPY hit a 17-month low below 110 on risk aversion, retreat in US Treasury yields, and speculation that Japan's monetary officials may wait until the end of the month to deliver more easing or get a better sense of whether USD can get a lift from improved earnings. The pair traded in a 110.20-60 range in the Asian session. In other USD majors, AUD/USD whipped around in the 0.7530-70 range, with most pronounced strength coming after China services PMI. NZD/USD traded in a 20pip bank around 0.68, consolidating the gains made after a strong dairy trade auction announced in early US hours.

- China Services PMI rose by a point to 52.2 and Composite PMI hit an 11-month high, returning to expansion territory. Markit did note that despite stronger expansion, companies took a cautious approach to staff numbers with the first fall in service sector employment since August 2013. Data findings were also tempered by only a slight rate of backlog depletion, and firms were also unable to pass on higher input costs. Caixin economist remarked that the govt still needs to push forward with "supplyside reform" to encourage the development of emerging industries.

- Also of note in China, former PBoC researcher Yu called for another round of infrastructure investment to boost demand given the economy's sound fiscal state, with "proactive fiscal policy and accommodative monetary policy" intended to secure sustainable growth. Fitch warned that while China hard landing is unlikely, there is some skepticism about govt's ability to avoid a slowdown. In Hong Kong, composite PMI contracted for the 13th straight month and also hit a 7-month low due to "weak market conditions and fewer new orders leading firms to reduce their purchasing activity sharply." HK staff numbers were also said to fall at the "fastest recorded since August 2015."

- With about a month to go to expected decision on 2nd round of consumption tax hike, Japan govt officials are debating just how bad the current conditions are to justify postponing the increase. PM Abe has recently suggested that the govt will raise the tax rate unless there is a Lehman-type event, and today LDP lawmaker Yamamoto remarked that consumption is at its worst level since the Lehman crisis. Govt spokesperson Suga replied that he does not see the current situation to be quite so dire. In the mean time, a research note out of JPMorgan suggested there is little chance of Japan intervening to curb Yen strength.

- Energy markets were also volatile in electronic trade after API inventories showed the first draw in 7 weeks. Also of note, Ecuador President said Latin America oil producers will meet on Apr 8th to discuss an oil output freeze. Recall overnight, Kuwait Opec Governor also suggested that there is likely to be an initial deal to freeze output at April 17th production meeting.

***Equities***
US equities / ADRs:
- PLCM: Merger talks with Mitel Networks reportedly in advanced stages - press; +10.5% afterhours
- WYNN: Reports prelim Q1 adj EBITDA $292-308M v $323M y/y; Rev $987-1.007B v $1.01Be; -1.6% afterhours
- CREE: Reports prelim Q3 $0.13-0.15 v $0.24e, R$367M v $420Me; -18.9% afterhours

- AGN: Pfizer and Allergan reportedly to terminate their merger agreement on Wednesday morning - financial press

Notable movers by sector:
- Consumer discretionary: Wasu Media Holding Co 000156.CN -1.6% (FY15 result)
- Consumer staples: Sugi Holdings Co 7649.JP -0.9% (FY15/16 result)
- Financials: Sunac China Holdings 1918.HK +4.8% (March result); China Vanke Co 2202.HK +0.3% (March result); Evergrande Real Estate Group 3333.HK -1.8% (March result)
- Industrials: BBMG Corp 2009.HK +7.0% (strategic cooperation); Broadspectrum BRS.AU +2.0% (Ferrovial increases final offer)
- Materials: China Resource Cement 1313.HK -1.2% (guidance); Newcrest Mining NCM.AU -0.2% (guidance); Saracen Mineral Holdings SAR.AU +1.7% (raises production forecast)
- Healthcare: Celltrion Inc 068270.KR -5.7% (FDA's approval of Pfizer's Inflectra)

>>> After Hours Summary: MITL +8% & PLCM +7% on Bloomberg reported


After Hours Summary: MITL +8% & PLCM +7% on Bloomberg reported merger talks; CREE -18% following reduced guidance

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: MITL +7.7% (Bloomberg reports Co is in advanced merger talks with PLCM), PLCM +6.5% (Bloomberg reports Co is in advanced merger talks with MITL), OAS +2.2% (commences an open season for the Johnson's Corner Pipeline Project)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: CREE -17.5%, WYNN -2%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: LINE -22.9% (enters into settlement agreement with certain debt holders), DOC -4% (commences 18 mln common share offering; 

>>> Why the German Car manufactures should be scared


Why the German Car manufactures should be scared… (in particular BMW, Daimler and VW)
Three German automakers: BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen are under threat to be disrupted by the current 267,000 pre-orders of Tesla 3
Currently Tesla is still a long way from “disrupting” the global auto giants, due to small quantity 50,000 and a clear sign that Tesla X was already a big struggle for the company. However I am certain Elon Musk will take extra care and apply a further capital raise, secured against the pre-orders. Clearly Tesla is not profitable, is spending heavily on capital expenditure, but this is in some way very good, as he is the only one who can afford it. Try this same spending plan at BWM, VW or Daimler. Shareholders would certainly be not very happy.
Even they today make cars in the millions, it does not matter. As Nokia versus Apple and Android has shown. I remember the first encounter at Google with Jyri and Petteri (two ex-Nokia employees, who developed Jaiku, an early version of Twitter (on Nokia’s) (acquired by Google)). Both showed me an early version of an Android phone. Numerous meetings without any progress, between truphone.com (a company I founded) and Nokia to make installations of Wifi Calling Apps less than 35 un-commercial and customer unfriendly steps, now rings a bell. This experience will be repeated in the car industry.
However as Tesla can already proof in the luxury segment in U.S. sales of its Model S sedan trounced those of directly comparable sedans from the German brands that have long dominated the global luxury-car conversation. And if I look at the market in Los Angeles TESLA S is clearly a market leader. Very rarely you see a BMW or a Daimler or an Audi on the streets of Santa Monica, Hollywood. Its a Tesla city, state, soon maybe country. The US takes the lead in Electric Cars, German will feel it heavily in lost pension, lost jobs in the coming years and decade. (disclosure I am German born, educated as a mechanical engineer in Germany, USA, UK), and have lived the past 20 years in Silicon Valley, New York and London.

THIS CHART FROM TESLA’S FOURTH-QUARTER SHAREHOLDER LETTER TALLIES U.S. MODEL S SALES AGAINST THOSE OF DIRECT LUXURY RIVALS. SOURCE: TESLA MOTORS
Cleary BMW, Daimer and VW did fine in 2015, of course, thanks in part to other vehicles in their portfolios (particularly luxury SUVs). (and to be clear I am fan of them as well).
But for BMW, Audi, and Mercedes-Benz, sedans are their core products — and compact sedans have long been their high-volume mainstays.
So here’s the question: Given the huge number of Model 3 reservations, how will the new baby Tesla compare with BMW’s vaunted 3 Series and its German rivals?
So this is how I see the Model 3 will impact the compact luxury sedan segment
Tesla CEO Elon Musk said on Sunday that the company had received in my opinion a fairly decent 276,000 “reservations” for the Model 3 sedan it unveiled late last week. I asked Elon Musk on Twitter if he could disclose the country break down, but so far we do not know the details.
Assuming that Tesla’s ramp-up to production goes roughly as it hopes, (and there is no issue like with Tesla X (which I believe was a mistake to build, and several owners of Tesla S and X have reported the X is mediocre in several aspects to the S).
How will Tesla Model 3 reservations translate into U.S. sales in 2018, when Model 3 deliveries are likely to begin in earnest? My assumption might be wrong but here they are:
Assume that 75% of those Model 3 reservations will “convert,” meaning that the people who hold them will end up actually buying a Model 3 when their turn comes up.
Assume that all of those cars will be delivered in 2018 (and that any further reservations will be for delivery in 2019 or later).
Assume that half will be delivered to U.S. customers. (Just over half of the 50,557 vehicles delivered by Tesla in 2015 went to customers in the U.S.)
Those three assumptions give us a total of 103,500 Model 3s delivered to U.S. customers in 2018. How does that compare to the Germans?
If 2015 U.S. sales are any indication, it compares very well indeed.
BMW (the current leader)
BMW 3- and 4 Series
140,609 (2015)
142,232 (2014)
Change –1.1%
Mercedes-Benz C-Class
86,080 (2015)
75,065 (2104)
Change +14.7%
Audi
A4 and A5
41,947 (2015)
50,613 (2014)
–17.1%
As you can see, my projected number for 2018 would have put Tesla’s Model 3 in second place in the segment in 2015, trailing only the combined total of BMW’s four-door 3 Series and two-door 4 Series.
And of course, that doesn’t really express its true likely impact, as it will almost certainly steal at least some sales from the Germans.
But even if the new Tesla doesn’t steal many sales from the Germans, it represents a lost opportunity to capture over 100,000 U.S. buyers that were willing to step up for a great electric luxury sedan.
Either way, executives including the German old and outdated board members, management teams within the giants, and employees) at those three brands have a lot to think about.
As one can see even politics can be disrupted (GOP Republican) party TRUMPism, hence the Germany companies could follow easily follow the Nokia route.
The Germans will likely respond with electric cars of their own, but how when the competition has gone so far to build 1) the worlds supply required for batteries 2) had driven millions of miles autonomous before BMW, Daimler and VW have any data 3) is in Silicon Valley and LA and has access to A.I., machine learning in a way German companies could only dream about, 4) and has the mentality on its board, its management team to execute and the capital structure.
I do think that the Model 3 will steal sales from more than just the German luxury brands. If the Model 3 didn’t exist, some of the 276,000 reservation holders might well buy a 3 Series or C-Class.
But as with the Model S (and almost certainly the new Model X SUV), Tesla will rightly be able to say that it trounced the German luxury brands if things play out as we’ve assumed. That has to hurt in Munich, Stuttgart, and Ingolstadt — and rumors suggest that all three brands are already working hard on new electric vehicles in hopes of matching or beating Tesla at its own game, just as Elon Musk has long hoped. However, if I would be a founder / CEO of BMW, Daimler or VW, I would opt for an emergency board meeting to set an agenda to not be disrupted.

>>> US Close Dow-0.75% S&P-1.01% Nasdaq-0.98% Russell-1.14%

Closing Market Summary: Indices End Lower as Financials and Health Care Weigh

The stock market ended the Tuesday affair on a lower note as global growth concerns and new rules regarding tax inversion mergers dominated today's trade. Additionally, fluctuating oil price and the underperformance of the heavily-weighted financial (-1.4%) and health care (-1.2%) spaces provided for some continued weakness in the broader market. The S&P 500 (-1.0%) finished its day behind both the Nasdaq Composite (-1.0%) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (-0.8%).

Equity indices opened their day sharply lower after global bourses struck a risk-off posture in response to a weak showing from Japan's Nikkei (-2.4%) and some below-consensus economic data out of Europe. Predominantly, disappointing German Factory Orders for February (-1.2%; expected +0.5%) and a weaker than expected reading of the March Markit Composite PMI (53.1; expected 53.7) for the eurozone dampened investor sentiment.

Furthermore, the U.S. Treasury Department surprised investors after yesterday's close, announcing new regulations regarding inversion mergers. The new provisions aim to make it more difficult for companies to complete corporate tax inversions through mergers by targeting serial inverters and the potential tax advantages of "earnings stripping." The news struck a chord with Allergan (AGN 236.55, -41.00), which is attempting to merge with Pfizer (PFE 31.36, +0.64) in an inversion-type deal.

A positive reading of the March ISM Index (54.5; consensus 54.0) helped offer a momentary reprieve from selling pressure, but the averages were unable to extend their rebound effort. A leg lower in crude oil and relative weakness from the financial (-1.4%) and health care (-1.2%) sectors brought the averages back towards their lows by the afternoon.

All ten sectors finished the day in the red with utilities (-1.9%), financials (-1.4%), and health care (-1.2%) rounding out the leader board.

In the heavyweight health care space (-1.2%), health care plan names and generic drug manufactures displayed relative weakness. The generic drug manufacturer sub-group traded lower in sympathy with Allergan after its merger with Pfizer was put in jeopardy. Meanwhile, health care plan companies underperformed after yesterday's release of the latest policy and payment updates for Medicare Health and Drug Plans.

The financial sector (-1.4%) demonstrated broad-based weakness as the group extended its 2016 decline to 6.7%. Wells Fargo (WFC 47.51, -0.99) and Bank of America (BAC 13.19, -0.32) outpaced the losses in the broader sector while Morgan Stanley (MS 24.38, -0.66) extended its weekly loss to 4.5%.

On the flipside, industrials (-0.6%), consumer staples (-0.7%), and materials (-0.7%) finished with the slimmest losses.

The commodity-sensitive energy sector (-0.8%) recovered from a 1.1% decline as the group tracked the trajectory of crude oil. On that note, WTI crude ended its day higher by 0.6% at $35.94/bbl ahead of tonight's stockpile data from the American Petroleum Institute. Separately, Baker Hughes (BHI 39.36, -2.11) saw increased pressure after reports indicated that the Department of Justice may file an antitrust suit in order to block the company's merger with Halliburton (HAL 34.40, +0.40).

The U.S. Dollar Index (94.63, +0.12) recovered from its worst level of the day as the greenback gained against the euro and trimmed its loss against the yen. The euro/dollar pair slipped 0.1% to 1.1383 while the dollar lost 0.9% against the yen (110.35).

The Treasury complex ended its day near its high with the yield on the 10-yr note dropping four basis points to 1.72%.

Today's participation was above the recent average as more than 1.04 billion shares changed hands on the NYSE floor. 

Today's economic data included February Trade Balance, ISM Service Index for March, and February JOLTs:

  • The latest trade data showed the U.S. trade deficit widened to $47.1 billion in February (consensus -$46.2 bln) from $45.9 billion in January.
    • That was due to imports increasing by $3.0 billion from January and exports increasing by only $1.8 billion.
    • On the surface, it sounds good to say that both exports and imports increased, yet there wasn't necessarily the strongest of demand accompanying those figures.
    • The uptick in exports was driven primarily by a $1.1 billion increase in consumer goods, almost all of which stemmed from exports of gem diamonds ($0.6 bln), pharmaceutical preparations ($0.3 bln), and artwork ($0.2 bln).
    • Similarly, the uptick in imports was driven by a $3.6 billion increase in consumer goods, more than half of which was owed to pharmaceutical preparations ($1.3 bln) and toys, games, and sporting goods ($0.6 bln).
    • The real trade deficit widened to $63.3 billion from $61.8 billion. The first quarter average of $62.6 billion is above the fourth quarter average of $60.1 billion, which is a negative factor for GDP computations.
  • The ISM Non-Manufacturing Index edged up to 54.5 in March from 53.4 in February. The March reading was above the consensus estimate of 54.0 and is the highest reading this year; however, the index stood at 56.9 in the same period a year ago.
    • The Non-Manufacturing Index report follows on the heels of the ISM Manufacturing Index, which also surprised to the upside.
    • The faster pace of growth in March should temper some of the festering concerns about a potential spillover effect from the slowdown on the manufacturing side of the economy, which had been building with five straight sub-50 readings for the ISM Manufacturing Index and a slower pace of growth for the ISM Non-Manufacturing Index over the same period. The dividing line between expansion and contraction is 50.0.
    • The improvement in March for the Non-Manufacturing Index was aided by upticks in several component indexes, namely new orders (from 55.5 to 56.7), employment (from 49.7 to 50.3), prices (from 45.5 to 49.1), and new export orders (from 58.5 to 53.5).
    • The import index (from 55.5 to 53.0) was the only index to turn down from February. The indexes for inventories and the backlog of orders were both unchanged at 52.5 and 52.0, respectively.
    • March marked the 74th straight month of expansion for the non-manufacturing sector.
  • The February Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey showed that job openings decreased to 5.445 million from a revised 5.604 million (revised from 5.541 million) in February.

Tomorrow's economic data will include the weekly MBA Mortgage Index and the release of the Federal Open Market Committee's latest Minutes, which will cross the wires at 7:00 ET and 14:00 ET, respectively. 

  • Russell 2000 -3.4% YTD
  • Nasdaq Composite -3.3% YTD
  • S&P 500 +0.1% YTD
  • Dow Jones +1.0% YTD