>>> Signet Jewelers beats by $0.01, misses on revs; guides Q2 EPS in-line; reaff

Signet Jewelers beats by $0.01, misses on revs; guides Q2 EPS in-line; reaffirms FY17 EPS guidance, lowers comps

  • Reports Q1 (Apr) earnings of $1.95 per share, excluding non-recurring items, $0.01 better than the Capital IQ Consensus of $1.94; revenues rose 2.9% year/year to $1.58 bln vs the $1.61 bln Capital IQ Consensus.
  • Same store sales increased 2.4% vs. +3-4% guidance, compared to an increase of 3.6% in the first quarter Fiscal 2016, driven primarily by strong sales in select branded bridal and diamond fashion jewelry. Ecommerce sales in the first quarter Fiscal 2017 were $80.1 million, or 5.1% of sales, up $3.2 million, or 4.2%, compared to $76.9 million in the first quarter Fiscal 2016. Overall, average transaction value ("ATV") was higher and number of transactions were lower due to merchandise mix.
  • Co issues in-line guidance for Q2, sees EPS of $1.49-1.54, excluding non-recurring items, vs. $1.53 Capital IQ Consensus; comps +1-2%.
  • Co reaffirms guidance for FY17, sees EPS of $8.25-8.55, excluding non-recurring items, vs. $8.41 Capital IQ Consensus; lowers comps to +2-3.5% from +3-4.5%.
  • Zale acquisition integration progressing well; synergies remain on-target.
  • Repurchased over 1.1 million shares in first quarter for $125.0 million.
  • Signet also announced that its Board of Directors has authorized management to conduct a strategic evaluation of the Company's credit portfolio. Goldman Sachs has been engaged as the Company's financial advisor in this process. Signet will consider a full range of options with respect to its credit operations and update investors as appropriate. Q1 credit metrics improved sequentially and in-line with expectations.

>>> Dollar General beats by $0.08, reports revs in-line

Dollar General beats by $0.08, reports revs in-line

  • Reports Q1 (Apr) earnings of $1.03 per share, $0.08 better than the Capital IQ Consensus of $0.95; revenues rose 7.0% year/year to $5.27 bln vs the $5.28 bln Capital IQ Consensus.
  • Same-store sales in the 2016 first quarter increased 2.2% over the 2015 first quarter resulting from increases in both customer traffic and average transaction amount.
    • Same-store sales increases were driven by positive results in both the consumables category and certain of the non-consumables categories, with sales of consumable merchandise outpacing sales of non-consumable merchandise.
    • Within the non-consumables categories, growth in same-store sales was due to seasonal and home products.
    • The net sales increase also was positively affected by sales from new stores, partially offset by sales from closed stores.

>>> Movado Group beats by $0.03, misses on revs; lowers guidance below consensus

Movado Group beats by $0.03, misses on revs; lowers guidance below consensus citing current retail trends
  • Reports Q1 (Apr) earnings of $0.19 per share, $0.03 better than the Capital IQ Consensus of $0.16; revenues fell 5.3% year/year to $114.1 mln vs the $116.47 mln Capital IQ Consensus.
  • Co issues downside guidance for FY17, sees EPS of $1.55-1.70 vs. $1.89 Capital IQ Consensus Estimate; sees FY17 revs of $565-580 mln vs. $592.10 mln Capital IQ Consensus Estimate.
  • "While we delivered results which were in line with our first quarter expectations, given the current retail trends, particularly in the fashion watch category in the United States, we feel it is prudent to lower our annual outlook. As we look to the balance of the year, we expect our brands to continue to increase market share and we remain encouraged by our innovation pipeline as evidenced by the early success of the Movado Edge collection, as well as our beautifully designed connected Movado watches. Our strong balance sheet allows us to continue to invest in our global brand building efforts while maintaining a high level of flexibility in this volatile environment."

Re/Code.net : Bring your own robot

Bring your own robot

A startup called Jibo will soon introduce a social robot for the home. One for the office can’t be far behind.

The sense of fear and loathing is rising as workers — especially once-secure-feeling knowledge workers — begin to see the threat that artificial intelligence poses to their livelihoods. Increasingly capable algorithms and robots are starting to perform tasks that previously required college degrees to tackle, like determining how an insurance policy should be priced, or what medical diagnosis best matches an unusual set of symptoms, or which marketing messages will generate most sales. Automation, which used to steal the jobs of those who did dangerous, dirty and dull work, is now threatening decision-makers and experts.

As workers try to get a bead on this threat, however, most tend to look upward, toward the managers and IT departments they suspect will wheel in the machines to outperform them. You might do better to glance to your side. The cognitive technology that puts pressure on your job is more likely to be your cubemate’s.

Here’s how it might well go down. Your colleague is just as stressed-out as you are at the rising imperative to do more with less, and the shrinking prospects of jobs, promotions, and raises. He is also equally frustrated by the amount of time he is spending on routine, codifiable parts of the job he mastered long ago. But being slightly more tech-savvy than you, he also spots a solution. By opening his own wallet and making a software purchase — taking advantage of the ever-plummeting cost of processing power — he shows up to work one day with an AI assistant in tow. Just as he made it to work faster than you because he used Waze to navigate through traffic, at work he’s able to make better investments, call on better customers, or make more accurate production forecasts than you.

The idea of "bring your own robot" is not as farfetched as it may seem. There are already automated tools that support a wide variety of specific tasks. And robots are getting easier to interact with. The new thing in manufacturing is "collaborative robots," which are much easier (and less dangerous) to train and work alongside. MIT professor Cynthia Breazeal has been working on "social robots" in the lab for a couple of decades, and is now an executive in a startup, Jibo, that will soon introduce a social robot for the home. One for the office can’t be far behind.

When it arrives, your colleague may become twice as productive and effective as you, and motivated enough to spend his found time cooking up innovations and other clever ways to serve the company’s customers better. He’s a superstar. Can you follow suit fast enough by bringing in your own robot helper? Maybe — but it’s doubtful that everyone in your department can. Will there even still be enough work to go around? If not, the most technically astute are most likely to keep their jobs.

There is a clear precedent for what we are describing. Starting a decade ago, IT departments started raising red flags over what they called the BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) movement. Suddenly, we were living in a world where the laptops, tablets and smartphones people bought for themselves were more powerful and flexible — and way more cool — than their employers’ standard issue.

Meanwhile, with boundaries between work and home life eroding, workers saw no sense in switching over to different devices at, say, 9 am and 5 pm. They started using their own tech in the office. At first, this was the scourge of corporate security, to be discouraged at all costs. But in much the same way that companies have embraced work-at-home arrangements, it was soon enough seen as a way to get higher performance without budgeting more for property, plant and equipment.

But if BYOD didn’t displace many workers we can point to, things may be different with the AI-enabled devices of the very near future. Dramatically more capable, they may be all the more welcome in workplaces, and could create enormous gulfs between the performance of those who invest in them and those who do not. How many managers and professionals have daydreamed of hiring assistants, even at their own expense, to enable them to outperform the rest of the pack — but could never follow through on the wish in their strictly controlled HR environments? Now they can do it, the expense will be manageable, and the arrangement will only get cheaper with time. Intelligent tools like IBM Watson once cost millions to buy, but they are rapidly evolving into smart, inexpensive "bots" or APIs that undertake specific cognitive

Does this all sound hideously Darwinian? Like the old joke about one hiker saying to another, "I don’t have to outrun the bear — I only have to outrun you"? There is a more optimistic way to look at things. When your colleague invests her own money in an AI solution, her motivation will be to arrange the partnership of human and machine such that she keeps the most fulfilling and engaging parts of the job. She will, in other words, aim for mutual augmentation, allowing herself (and the machine) to take on challenges that would have been insurmountable acting alone. She won’t render herself redundant with a fully automated solution.

Peer-introduced AI in workplaces might therefore demonstrate the possible, and set the tone for the employer-sponsored implementations of smart machines that will eventually follow. We suspect that, henceforth, at least as many process improvements will percolate up from the people doing work as will be imposed by the managers sitting layers above them. It usually takes someone who really knows both the job and the capabilities of technology to specify the right division of labor.

So if you’re worried about the rise of the robots and what it might mean for your employment situation, don’t expect the invasion to come from above. Look for it on all sides. And maybe stop assuming you can’t be friends with those smart machines.

>>> Street Pre-Market Indications

CS:
Amec M/P Awarded FEED contract by Kuwait Oil Company -no financials
Autoliv -2% KKR said to seek control of Takata (Takata could survive)
Balfour UNCH Awarded contract for M20 lorry area - worth £120m
B&M +2-3% Pre-tax profit 2% beat, EBITDA 2% beat, special divi of 10p
Bureau Veri -0.5% CFO Sami Badarani to leave, replaced by Nicolas Tissot
Daily Mail -3-4% Company now see DMG op margin at 10% from 13%
Debenhams +1-2% Names Amazon's Sergio Bucher as CEO
Evolva +2-3% Receives patent for Steviol Glycosides
Inchcape +2% Peformance inline with co expectations
Miners +0.5% Copper +0.65%, Brent +1.75%, Iron Ore +0.45%, China -0.92%
Oils +0.5% WTI +1.8% vs Europe close and Brent trades above $50
NN Group UNCH Q1 operating 2% light, launching a Eu0.5bn buyback
Pets at home -2% Numbers inline but margins a touch negative
QinetiQ M/P Revs slightly light, FY17 remain unchanged
Sanofi M/P Wins FDA Panel’s Backing for Once-Daily Diabetes Combo
Seadrill +1-2% Q1 Revs inline, EBITDA 14% ahead
Tate & Lyle +1-2% PBT 193m adjusted vs 190m, confident on progress
United Utils UNCH EBIT inline, EPS at 47.7p consensus at 48.4p

JPM:
BANCO POP Capital raise of EU2.51bn. EU1.25/shr price for each sh. -10%
BME Prelim results, bang in line, will pay special div in July. +3%
DMGT Op margin c.10%, guided to c.113%, div slightly lower. -2%
INCHCAPE Good start, expects to deliver constant performance in 2016 +1%
NN Buyback EUR500m vs JPMe 250m. Dutch life well ahead. +2%
SOPHOS Very strong performance, LFL billings +20% YoY. +3%
SPAN BANKS POP raise will read to the sector. -2%
TATE FY16 op profit 2% below, PBT ahead. EPS above. unch
UU's Revenues, EPS in line unch

Numis:
* B&M EUROPEAN +1%; Numbers bang in line with a £100m special divi announced.
* BALFOUR BEATTY mkt; M20 contract award.
* BENCHMARK +1%; Update in-line, development pipeline is progressing well, confident outlook.
* CLIPPER unch; Trading inline, full roll out of John Lewis collaboration, no change to #’s, we go to HOLD fm BUY target remains 290p.
* DMGT -2%; Mixed statement, advertising remains challenging in the 8wks to May 22nd.
* FOXTONS mkt; New CFO.
* HOSTELWORLD -5%; Q2 trading below expectations due to geo-political events.
* IBSTOCK -2%; TU good trading momentum in to '16, FY expectations broadly unch.
* IMAGINATION TECH -2%; Takes £50m exceptional, underlying trading inline, Heath appointed CEO.
* INCHCAPE +1%; Strong revenue performance and confident on outlook.
* LONDONMETRIC mkt; Development site acqn in Crawley.
* PAN AFRICAN RESOURCES +5%; Acquisition & placing of 111m shares @ 14.25p, (£16m) @ 5% premium to last night close.
* PAYPOINT -1%; Net revenue in line.
* POWERFLUTE unch; Update & AGM all in line.
* QINETIQ -2%; Top line miss but bottom line as expected. Markets remain challenging. Outlook unch.
* SOPHOS +3%; Headline numbers strong, confident outlook.
* STOBART mkt; Completion of disposal of investment property for £37m.
* TATE & LYLE +1%; Finals in-line, small beat on PBT £193m V £191m est. margin expansion in both divisions, confident outlook.
* UNITED UTILITIES -1%; Revenue was £1,730m,underlying operating profit was £604m, lower than last year (£664m) as expected.
* VECTURA +2%; Numbers small beat. Advate patent loss as expected. CFO to step down post merger.

Shore
ASOS - co-founder sells 1.3m shares @ 3525p to cover divorce settlement....UNCH
TATE & LYLE - sales +1% £2.35bn,PBT +5% £193m,restructure cost below f'cast.+2%
DEBENHAMS - announces Sergio Bucher as new ceo, ex VP of Amazon Europe.....UNCH
DAILY MAIL - revs -1%,oper.pft -12%,lowers dmg media margin g'dance.........-3%
VECTURA - revs +24% £72m,EBITDA +43%,profits +35%,royalties impacted........-2%
IBSTOCK - good trading momentum continues,sees FY expectations unchanged....+1%
HENRY BOOT - all units trading well,confident on meeting FY expec..........UNCH
BALFOUR BEATTY - Awarded contract for M20 lorry area........................+1%
INCHCAPE - 4 month lfl revs +11.3%.Ptp.Have had good start to year..........+1%
IMAGINATION TECH - Restructure to result in 50m charge.Performance in line..-3%
PETS AT HOME - Group rev 793.1m.Sees margins this yr hit by weaker currency.-1%
DARTY - total revs +12.8%,LfL +12%,margins -160bps,debt lower..............UNCH

>>> Bayer hires Brunswick, Sard Verbinnen, CNC, Finsbury and Hering Schupperner

Bayer hires Brunswick, Sard Verbinnen, CNC, Finsbury and Hering Schupperner as PR advisers on Monsanto bid

Bayer [ETR:BAYN] has hired the public relations companies Brunswick, Sard Verbinnen, CNC, Finsbury and Hering Schuppener to work on its USD 62bn (EUR 81.58bn) takeover bid for Monsanto [NYSE:MON], the Financial Times reported.

The newspaper did not cite a source for the information, but quoted Bayer chief executive Werner Baumann, who said the German pharmaceuticals and chemicals group is working on “reputational measures” and that the company is working with agencies to address issues of reputation management and communications.

Hering Schuppener and Finsbury are advising Bayer specifically on reputational issues, the item said.

Bayer announced on 23 May that it had approached Monsanto, a St Louis, Missouri-based crop science company, about a takeover offer at USD 122 per share. Monsanto on 24 May said it had rejected the offer as incomplete and financially inadequate, but added that it was open to further talks to explore whether a deal was possible.

The Financial Times report noted that some advocacy groups, including Campact, are against the proposed deal. Campact has urged supporters to petition against the proposed tie-up, the item said, adding that a petition has gained 92,900 signatures.

Monsanto’s business of genetically modified (GM) seeds has proved controversial, as has its association with the chemical glyphosate, which is used in the weed killer Roundup. The World Health Organisation has said Roundup is probably carcinogenic, the item noted.

The European Union is considering whether to grant glyphosate a renewed licence and several large EU members are opposed to renewing the licence, the article added.

Bayer’s head of crop science strategy, Mathias Kremer, said Europe is the only region in which genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are controversial, adding that GMOs are seen as either positive or neutral worldwide.

Baumann concedes that shareholders have informed him of concerns about the reputational risk that could come with a takeover of Monsanto, the article said.

Separately, The Times reported that the US National Farmers Union has asked the US Department of Justice to give carefully and critically review any deals including the proposed tie-up between Bayer and Monsanto that would lead to less competition in the agricultural sector. The newspaper quoted the NFU, which said the agricultural sector is already “heavily concentrated.”

Financial Times, The Times (London)

>>> The Restaurant Group shares spike on large trade; Apollo said to be interest

The Restaurant Group shares spike on large trade; Apollo said to be interested

The Restaurant Group’s [LON:RTN] share price spiked late in trading on the London Stock Exchange yesterday, 25 May, the Financial Times reported. The newspaper’s market report section said the gain was partially due to an atypically large trade shortly before the market closed yesterday.

The item noted previous speculation that private equity groups including Apollo Global Management may be interested in acquiring The Restaurant Group. Apollo owns rival UK restaurant operator Casual Dining Group, the report noted.

The Restaurant Group’s share price closed 17.4p up at 370.5p in London yesterday, valuing the company at GBP 744m (EUR 979m).


Financial Times