FT Lex : Queueing is not a virtue when it comes to building data centres

Queueing is not a virtue when it comes to building data centres
Builders of facilities that power AI are stuck in a snaking queue to connect to the UK grid but stamping out gaming of the system could help

As a nation, the UK holds queues in high regard. To those watching from abroad, the 10-mile line to view Queen Elizabeth II’s lying-in-state seemed almost as quintessentially British as the sovereign herself. Yet it doesn’t always make sense to allocate scarce resources on a first-come-first-served basis. The rush to build data centres is an example.

Builders of facilities that power artificial intelligence — which Britain views as crucial to its economic growth — are stuck in a snaking queue to connect to the electricity grid. At the last count, the combined needs of those awaiting connections, many of them data centres, had more than tripled in a year, to 125 gigawatts. Wait times are between 8 and 10 years, thinks consultancy Ember Energy. Some face more than a decade. 


That’s disastrous for a sector engaged in a land-grab. Countries with shorter wait times, such as the Nordics and Italy, are expected to attract a greater share of hyperscalers’ money. The idea of data centres — and thus data — escaping to other countries also raises national concerns about security and resilience.

Britain can, though, speed things up, by stamping out gaming of the system. The ever-lengthening queue incentivises even those without firm projects to apply for a connection. The energy system operator has already started to address a similar issue on the supply queue — those lining up to provide new power generation to the grid — and is likely to impose requirements for queue entry and membership.

Even so there will still be more real ones than the grid can accommodate. So another idea is to let the hyperscalers build their own ‘micro-grids’, with their own power generation and their own batteries, to be gradually subsumed into the national electricity network over time.

This is a smart workaround, and not just because it makes it more likely that data centre infrastructure will actually get built. Those generating their own power may be allowed to jump the queue and hook up to the national grid too, on the understanding that they will barely need to use it. But that two-way connection means that in times when they are producing more power than they need, they can feed some back into the wider pool.

A free-for-all does have drawbacks. Data centre builders may lean on gas-fired generation as a quick fix, at least initially, slowing the country’s progress towards decarbonisation. But the regulator could steer them towards renewables where that’s possible, and insist power sources are replaced with greener alternatives once available. The alternative is for the country’s AI ambitions to remain gridlocked. Uncomfortable as it may seem, some queue-barging is justified.

>>> Weekend Papers Summary

FINANCIAL TIMES
-The Trump administration has informed Ukrainian and European officials that there is limited flexibility regarding its plan to conclude Russia's war, pressuring Volodymyr Zelenskyy to agree to a deal facilitated by Moscow by Thursday. During a tense meeting in Kyiv, US Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll expressed optimism about the potential for peace but emphasized that the US would not negotiate the details of the plan. The meeting, which was perceived as negative by some European officials, coincided with President Donald Trump's remarks suggesting Ukraine must accept Washington's terms. This prompted urgent discussions among European leaders at the G20 summit in Johannesburg regarding interventions to support Ukraine. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that allies would meet during the summit to negotiate a full ceasefire and enhance the current proposal in support of Trump's peace effort.
-On Friday, at the White House, Donald Trump and Zohran Mamdani, the newly elected mayor of New York City, engaged in an unexpected and amicable meeting in the Oval Office. The two leaders, despite their previous contentious exchanges—Trump labeling Mamdani as a Democratic socialist and Mamdani criticizing Trump as a “despot”—expressed mutual respect following their discussions focused on the affordability crisis affecting New Yorkers. Trump remarked on their shared love for the city, saying he felt comfortable with Mamdani as mayor, while Mamdani expressed appreciation for the productive dialogue, highlighting their common goal of improving New York City's affordability. This meeting, which diverged from expectations of confrontational exchanges, marked a significant moment of cooperation between the divergent political figures.
-The Kremlin is shifting the blame to the West for an upcoming tax increase aimed at protecting Vladimir Putin from backlash over the negative impact of the war economy on ordinary Russians. High-ranking officials, including Sergei Kirienko, participated in discussions prior to the new budget law, which raises the value-added tax (VAT) from 20% to 22%, contrary to Putin's prior commitment not to increase taxes before 2030. State-controlled media were provided guidelines to frame the tax rise as a result of Western actions in the Ukraine war, advising them to avoid personal mentions of Putin and focus on positive aspects of other tax measures in the budget.
- Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has intensified his security measures amid concerns of potential US military action, tailoring recent public appearances to rally support under heightened scrutiny. His events are now announced last minute and feature selected crowds, as opposed to his previous appearances alongside high-ranking officials, which have diminished due to risks of targeting. Analysts note Maduro's approach reflects classic security protocols in response to perceived threats, ensuring he appears with large crowds to deter US aggression. The US has mobilized forces in the Caribbean, carrying out numerous strikes on vessels, which Maduro interprets as a move towards regime change. His security detail increasingly relies on Cuban personnel due to fears of disloyalty among Venezuelan guards amid economic turmoil.
-French lawmakers rejected a first draft of the 2026 budget, complicating Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu's efforts to achieve a deficit reduction from 5.4% to below 5% by year-end. This budget could determine Lecornu's political survival, given the fragmentation of parliament into three blocs without a majority. The bill, aimed at tax increases including on multinationals and wealthy individuals, was voted down by 404 lawmakers out of 577, even within Lecornu's centrist camp. Budget Minister Amélie de Montchalin criticized the proposed amendments as excessive but remains hopeful for future consensus in the National Assembly.
- Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has announced her resignation from Congress following a fallout with President Donald Trump, stating she cannot endure a "hurtful and hateful primary" against her. In a video posted to social media, Greene expressed her self-respect in making the decision and said her last day in office would be January 5, 2026. Her resignation follows Trump's withdrawal of support and his endorsement of a primary challenger. Greene criticized both Trump and fellow Republicans, claiming she worked hard to secure their electoral successes while establishment Republicans who opposed Trump have been welcomed back.
-Sales of Apple's iPhone Air, touted as a major redesign, have fallen short of expectations, prompting consumers to choose alternatives that offer better value and features. Launched in September, the iPhone Air's higher price and downsized camera and speaker quality to achieve its slim 5.64mm design have contributed to disappointing sales. IDC reports that Apple significantly reduced production plans shortly after launch, as sales reached only a third of initial forecasts. Despite iPhone sales being crucial, generating $209B in the past year, growth has stagnated, leading Apple to seek strategies to enhance sales.
-The planned cruise of Chinese passengers aboard the Adora Mediterranea to Japan's Miyako Island was thwarted by escalating tensions between China and Japan, ignited by comments from Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan. Passengers expressed disappointment, emphasizing national pride. The diplomatic crisis, deemed one of the worst in years, risks broader implications, including trade disruptions and increased travel warnings, as investors react to potential economic fallout. Meanwhile, the US ambassador has voiced support for Japan, highlighting the complexities of international commitments amidst this growing conflict.
-A US bankruptcy court has ordered Byju's founder, Byju Raveendran, to pay over $1B in a legal battle with creditors. The ruling follows a lawsuit regarding the misappropriation of proceeds from a $1.2B US term loan from 2021. The Delaware court found Raveendran in contempt for failing to cooperate with legal proceedings, with daily penalties accumulating to hundreds of thousands of dollars. Judge Brendan Shannon described the $1.07B relief as "extraordinary" and noted the unique circumstances of the case. Creditors earlier accused Raveendran and others of "masterminding the theft" of $533M in loan proceeds.
NEW YORK TIMES
-In 2025, the US economy displays a stark divide, with the artificial intelligence (AI) sector thriving while other industries falter. In states like Nevada and North Dakota, A.I. data center construction counterbalances local economic downturns caused by weak tourism and low oil prices. Meanwhile, the Washington D.C. area faces federal job cuts and a historic government shutdown, though AI investments provide some relief. The economic boom from AI is evidenced by substantial investments in technology, driving growth in gross domestic product.
-The standard Medicare Part B premium for 2026 is set to increase to $202.90/month, representing a 9.7% rise and marking the first instance it exceeds $200. This figure is 66% higher than it was a decade ago. Additionally, the annual Part B deductible will increase to $283, reflecting a 70.5% rise over the past 10 years. The premium increase will significantly impact the Social Security cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), consuming a large portion of the 2.8% increase in benefits. Consequently, retirees may find their effective COLA much lower than anticipated, with those receiving $2,008 monthly seeing a reduction to 1.9%, and lower-income beneficiaries receiving only 1%. Experts are highlighting the financial strain this places on seniors.
-Eli Lilly has achieved a milestone of $1T in market value, becoming the first publicly traded health care company to do so. This surge is largely due to the success of its GLP-1 weight loss medications, including Zepbound and Mounjaro, which are projected to be the world's top-selling drug this year. Under CEO Dave Ricks, who has led since 2017, Lilly has gained over $900B in market value. This achievement places Lilly alongside only a few technology companies that have reached the trillion-dollar mark, such as Nvidia.
-NYC Mayor Mamdani and President Trump, previously adversarial, have shown a surprising camaraderie after Mamdani's recent electoral victory. Despite Trump's prior accusations labeling Mamdani a “communist” and suggesting his illegal residency, Trump expressed respect for Mamdani as a political underdog, acknowledging his rise from obscurity. Trump noted the public interest in the narrative, contrasting it with his meetings with foreign leaders, which received less media attention. Mamdani skillfully referenced Trump’s voter support in New York to engage with the president and facilitate a constructive dialogue.
- Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia announced her resignation from Congress, effective January, following President Trump's condemnation of her as a "traitor" for her actions regarding the Justice Department's release of Jeffrey Epstein's files. Greene, who has had recent conflicts with Trump despite her previous staunch support, emphasized the need for loyalty and accountability to constituents in her announcement video, suggesting that her disconnection from "MAGA Inc" reflects a broader neglect of ordinary Americans.
-Recent environmental deregulations proposed by the Trump administration threaten U.S. ecosystems and species. The EPA aims to limit Clean Water Act protections affecting millions of acres of wetlands. Proposed changes to the Endangered Species Act may make it harder to safeguard endangered species, weighing economic impacts in decisions on species protection. Moreover, the Interior Department is pushing for extensive new oil and gas drilling across 1.3 billion acres of U.S. coastal waters. These proposals could irreparably harm water quality and biodiversity if enacted, and come amidst a significant global climate summit from which the U.S. abstained. Environmental advocates argue that the administration's fast-paced rollbacks will lead to severe ecological damage.
- After fluctuating in strategy, President Trump seems to have adopted a long-term pressure approach on Russia regarding the Ukraine war. He implemented new oil sanctions, albeit weaker than desired, and approved arms sales to Ukraine from European sources, boosting U.S. defense contractors. However, he hesitated on offering Tomahawk missiles, fearing escalation with Russia. His proposed peace plan largely aligns with Putin's demands, suggesting Ukraine cedes territory in Donetsk and Luhansk to Russia, recognizes this as Russian land, restricts NATO forces in Ukraine, and limits the Ukrainian military to 600,000 troops while prohibiting long-range weapons.
-President Trump criticized Nigeria for its inability to protect Christians, labeling the violence there as "genocide" for the first time. He expressed outrage on Fox News, asserting that thousands are being killed and threatened military action against the nation. The Nigerian national security adviser met with US Defense Secretary to address these allegations. Although over 8,000 people were reported killed in Nigeria this year, evidence does not suggest a higher attack rate on Christians compared to Muslims. Various forms of violence are prevalent, including terrorism, kidnappings, and land disputes, often with impunity for perpetrators. Trump's designation of Nigeria as a "Country of Particular Concern" highlights its severe religious freedom violations and potential military intervention from the US has been discussed.
NEW YORK POST
-President Trump's tariffs, aimed at bolstering U.S. manufacturing, may be backfiring, causing considerable anxiety among manufacturers. Despite an overall positive jobs report, the manufacturing sector had a significant decline, shedding nearly 100,000 jobs over the past year, leading to a decrease in blue-collar employment. The tariffs intend to raise the price of imports to encourage purchases of American-made products and resurrect domestic manufacturing. However, this view is overly simplistic, as the share of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. has fallen from around 27% in the 1960s to just above 8% now, a trend largely attributed to consumers' increasing preference for services. This decline is mirrored in other advanced economies, suggesting that attempts to resurrect past manufacturing levels through tariffs are futile, similar to the myth of King Canute asking the waves to recede. Furthermore, the tariffs increase the cost of imported materials, negatively impacting US manufacturing operations.
-Nancy Pelosi's potential retirement marks a significant shift for Autopilot, the investment tracking app that has gained prominence by following her trading activities. With $1B in assets under management and three million downloads, Autopilot recently secured $8M in funding to expand its operations from San Francisco to New York City. Chris Josephs, the founder of Autopilot, emphasizes the app's mission to promote transparency by showcasing top investors. He acknowledges Pelosi’s exit as a pivotal moment for the political stock trading landscape but has no immediate plans to rename the popular @pelositracker social media account, viewing it as a tribute to her influence. Autopilot is also focused on enhancing its team by hiring experienced engineers and traders, including a notable recruit from Citadel.

The information : Maybe Google Does Win It All

Maybe Google Does Win It All

A horrifying thought has lately been immovable from my mind: Am I gonna have to dump ChatGPT for Gemini?

Well, Gemini 3 is out, and it’s pretty darn slick: Google has improved the chatbot’s ability to code, search and create images, among other features. AI researcher Ethan Mollick is a fan, and so is Stratechery’s Ben Thompson. Our Stephanie Palazzolo deemed it “well worth the wait and the hype.”

What a difference a year or so makes. As recently as spring 2024, Gemini looked like a disaster, attracting widespread jeers for an aesthetic sensibility that wouldn’t have been out of place in a Wesleyan art class. Around that same time, OpenAI seemed to take great pleasure in tweaking Google’s tail, releasing competing products at almost exactly the same moment, many of which got plenty of applause. So people like me threw our lot in with OpenAI and befriended Chat, a buddy I’ve taught to understand my tastes as much as possible—from my morning coffee ritual (a Moka, though sadly not this Moka) to my preferred travel (like this delightful Slovenian hiking-biking expedition).

Having already invested some time and effort in personalizing the chatbot, I’m reluctant to use another, especially if everything I’ve told it becomes a part of a gee-whiz AI device. This speaks to a truism in tech that’s familiar to anyone who’s worked on, say, consumer apps: It’s hard to simply get people to download an app and build the habits that lead to steady use, and convincing someone to switch to a different app is tough, too. Just consider how Twitter has survived more assassination attempts than a third-world dictator.

For now, ChatGPT has many more users than Gemini: 800 million weekly users, while Gemini reports just 650 million monthly users, a wide gulf that reflects OpenAI’s first-mover advantage. OpenAI will hang on to many of them—many of us—simply by that law of inertia I just mentioned.

But there’s no getting around it: OpenAI seems to have fallen behind. We didn’t see it gleefully yanking on Google’s rear this past week, and the recent decision to reach for engagement bait like adult content suggests it has concerns about continued growth—at least in the short term. And while Fidji Simo, the company’s CEO of apps, appears eager to publicly insist the startup’s world domination can continue apace, CEO Sam Altman acknowledged behind closed doors last month that Google’s recent resurgence in AI would mean “rough” vibes for the time being, according to a scoop from our Stephanie and Erin Woo.

Plus, it’s not like OpenAI has been picking up cool points, which might mitigate an innovation slowdown.

Take Sora, for example—the startup’s last big thing. While the video app’s debut made for an undeniable moment, it has also made OpenAI into the de facto enemy of Hollywood and the creative class. Minus 100 cool points!

Relatedly, go talk to someone outside the coastal bubbles—another horrifying thought, I know—and I expect you’ll find that ChatGPT is increasingly the stand-in for AI as an evil, labor-market menace in people’s minds. Simply, ChatGPT is the most resonant brand in AI—and in this case, I guess that counts as a first-mover disadvantage. I used to think Gemini’s lack of powerful branding would really hurt it, but if sentiment around AI does really shift at some point, Google could be in a much better position. Maybe the name “Gemini” dissolves—wouldn’t be much of a loss brandingwise, would it?—and all that high-quality underlying technology gets quietly folded into Chrome and Google Search.

That scenario reminds me of that scene from “Mad Men”—coming to HBOMax in 4K in two weeks!—when Don Draper’s Sterling Cooper colleagues try to talk him into joining them in a pitch for American Airlines, which has just suffered a crash.

“We already have an airline,” Don says.

“We don’t have American,” says his boss, Roger Sterling. “Well, that’s right,” Don replies. “We have the one whose planes didn’t just fall out of the sky.”

Or, in the context of Google’s public image, the company would have the technology that didn’t just vaporize millions of jobs. Just boring ol’ Google Search.

The information : Zach Dell Thinks He Can Solve America’s Energy Crisis

Zach Dell Thinks He Can Solve America’s Energy Crisis
With $1 billion in new funding, Zach Dell, son of billionaire Michael Dell, envisions his startup turning millions of homes into one giant battery.

To get inside why Zach Dell believes he will shake up the half-trillion-dollar U.S. power industry and then go global, it helps to take account of who’s inspiring the moves.

That would be his father, Michael Dell, who sold computer parts out of his college dorm at 19, took Dell Computer public four years later and by age 26 had entirely disrupted the personal computer business and become one of the richest people in the world.

At 29, the younger Dell is still working out the kinks at Base Power, the Austin, Texas, battery startup he co-founded two years ago. That, he concedes, puts him just slightly behind the pace his father set four decades ago. “I got off to a late start,” Dell jokes. Still, investors have been throwing money at him, most recently a $1 billion round in October, which valued Base at $4 billion, almost five times its valuation six months earlier. Base plans to spend some of the money on building two battery-making factories in Austin.

Dell’s idea resembles his father’s effort to bring personal computers to the masses. He is leasing no-frills home backup batteries—large gray boxes that sit outside—for a cut-rate $19 a month plus a few hundred dollars in installation fees. That’s a huge discount to the approximately $15,000 it costs to install a Tesla Powerwall.

The batteries provide homeowners with a source of cheap power for keeping their lights on if a blackout or a natural disaster hits. They’re Wi-Fi enabled and grid connected, so Base recharges them from the grid when its software calculates energy costs are low. In other moments, Base routes energy stored in the batteries to the grid to meet elevated demand—selling that energy at a higher price. The deal doesn’t include solar.

Roughly 18 months ago, it took Dell’s service crew a couple of days to install the first Base home battery. “But then we were just like, ‘OK, how do we make the next step? How do we go from 10, to 20, to 30, to 40 a day?’ Just go, go, go,” Dell said. The crews are now up to 50 installations on good days and have the batteries in more than 7,000 Texas homes. At a scale of millions of homes, Base batteries would be capable of operating like a gigantic power plant.

Base arrives at a time when America is deeply worried about energy. AI data centers threaten to put enormous strain on the country’s existing infrastructure, which was already struggling before their mass proliferation.

Dell notes that utilities are scrambling to get capacity on the grid to meet this booming demand, and he thinks Base will disrupt incumbent energy incumbents like NRG Energy by adding capacity faster than they can: His batteries are, after all, far easier to get running than setting up a nuclear power plant. “We are a technology-led company in an industry without technology-led companies” he said. After conquering the U.S., he plans to expand to Australia, Germany, Spain, the U.K. and other countries.

Dell, with his talk of world expansion and market dominance, fits a certain mold: He’s one of the scions of 1980s and 1990s billionaires who have suddenly surfaced with big plans to shake up industries like biotech, renewable energy and media. There’s David Ellison, son of Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, whose Skydance Media has acquired Paramount Global and is making a run at Warner Bros. Discovery. Meanwhile, Reed Jobs, Steve Jobs’ eldest son and the head of venture firm Yosemite, is seeking to eradicate cancer.

Of course, Dell’s plans come with some big risks: It’s no sure thing that homeowners everywhere will be as eager as power-starved Texans to pay for a battery—or that AI companies will actually build all the data centers in their most ambitious forecasts.

Base will retain ownership of its batteries, meaning it is also assuming enormous expense—which may explain why others have avoided following in Dell’s footsteps. He will have to keep going back to investors and either giving up more equity or taking debt on the company’s balance sheet, until some unknown future date when Base’s cash flow can cover its growth.

“How do you sustain this?” said industry veteran Vikash Venkataramana, the San Francisco–based chief product officer for India’s Amara Raja Power Systems. “You have to keep raising large sums of capital if you want to grow.”

Dell, as it happens, might be just the person in the unique position to do so. “Zach has the ability to raise huge sums of money because of who he is,” Venkataramana said. “I don’t think any entrepreneur trying to do this would be able to bring in this much capital.”

Dell concedes that he has basically been tutored since boyhood on exactly this sort of capture-an-industry play. “I got to see front row how this is done,” he said. “And I feel very blessed to have had that perspective.”

Watching his father do that in computers, Dell obsessed over building his own “great company,” and not just any great company. “I’d been looking for paradigm shifts,” he said of his early 20s. “I was looking for a wave to surf.”

The main vibe you get from Dell is a sense of imperviousness. At 17, for instance, he raised $585,000 from investors including his father’s pal Marc Benioff to bankroll a dating app called Thread. It failed to take off, but Dell shrugged off the experience as no big deal. Growing up as he had, “I was kind of unafraid,” he told me.

In 2020, soon after graduating from the University of Southern California with a social sciences degree, Dell went to work as a private equity analyst at Blackstone. That gave him more confidence, he said, especially about taking “big swings” at deals involving “big numbers on a spreadsheet.”

“You’re the analyst on these big, billion-dollar transactions, and the partners are relying on your math and your analysis,” he said.

In 2021, Dell went to work for Thrive Capital, the venture firm founded by Josh Kushner. He was part of an eight-member team that invested in SpaceX and Anduril Industries, both formative experiences. Dell looked up to the billionaire founders of those two companies—Elon Musk and Palmer Luckey—as role models. They went after big traditional industries—Musk with space, Luckey with weapons—and won.

Now, when Dell looked at big power companies in the U.S. and elsewhere in the West, he thought he saw the same sort of target. Based on cost trends, he thought stationary storage batteries and solar would come to supplant coal as the cheapest way to power the grid—and that could be really big. Yet the leaders of battery and solar companies were moving slowly, if at all.

“These are not engineers, and they’re not engineering-led companies: They are finance-led companies,” he said. “They don’t look like SpaceX; they don’t look like Anduril; they don’t look like Tesla. And energy is a deeply technical part of the economy where technology is really needed.”

Dell made a decision: “I wanted to do to energy what SpaceX did to aerospace and Anduril did to defense.”

While Thrive was conducting its due diligence on Anduril, Dell met Justin Lopas, Anduril’s head of manufacturing and a former SpaceX engineer. In 2023, the two, along with a slew of Tesla, SpaceX and Anduril veterans, co-founded Base. In regular tweets, Michael Dell, who did not respond to a request for comment, has cheered from the sidelines.

“There’s a guy named Dell building a great company in Austin,” he wrote on X last month.

Dell’s push into batteries aligns with the U.S. data center boom. According to BloombergNEF, a renewable energy research firm, hyperscalers will need 362 gigawatts of additional power worldwide by 2035 to sustain the growing data center fleet. Almost half of those will be required in the U.S., according to the Brattle Group. One gigawatt is equivalent to the power usage of up to 750,000 homes. So if the announced projects materialize, the data centers would use the power equivalent of about 270 million homes, or twice the number of U.S. households.

No one knows where the AI industry will get all that power, which makes electricity the biggest bottleneck in expanding data center capacity. Dell thinks his batteries would be a relatively fast—and generally overlooked—way to add gigawatts of capacity to the grid: If a fraction of U.S. households installed a 25 kilowatt-hour battery, the minimum size Base installs, they would provide for much of hyperscalers’ peak needs.

That’s a very simplistic picture, though. The reality is more complicated. Battery-equipped houses would have to be located where hyperscalers need them. And Dell has to make sure that in trading away the power in homeowners’ batteries, he doesn’t leave them high and dry during a blackout, triggering a massive and company-killing customer revolt.

Base will need to keep raising cash—billions of dollars—to buy all those battery cells and the power devices and other parts needed to assemble them into packs for the global buildout Dell outlines. Doing a back-of-the-envelope calculation, the $1 billion he raised last month will perhaps cover a couple hundred thousand home batteries and the initial capacity of the factory he is planning near the Austin airport. There is no guarantee that investors will keep their wallets open, even for someone named Dell.

But Dell seems unworried as usual. He talks like the rest will be there when it needs it. His cash in hand is “a good amount,” he said. “We’ll go, you know, execute and reevaluate.”

CrunchBase : The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: A Lot Of Really Big Deals

The Week’s 10 Biggest Funding Rounds: A Lot Of Really Big Deals

Perhaps venture investors wanted to get their term sheets squared away in advance of the holiday season. Or maybe AI, despite all the bubble talk, is still heating up in a big way in the startup sphere. Whatever the reason, this past week was an exceptionally busy one for very large startup financings.

Not surprisingly, an AI company led the rankings. Lambda, a provider of AI cloud infrastructure, closed on $1.5 billion in Series E funding. Next up was predictions market Kalshi, which picked up $1 billion. More AI, plus crypto, fintech and biotech rounded out the list.

1. Lambda, $1.5B, AI cloud infrastructure: San Francisco-based Lambda, a provider of AI cloud infrastructure, says it raised over $1.5 billion in Series E funding led by TWG Global, a holding company led by Thomas Tull and Mark Walter. Founded in 2012, Lambda has raised $3.2 billion in equity and debt funding to date, per Crunchbase data.

2. Kalshi, $1B, predictions market: Kalshi, a marketplace for wagering predictions on future events, reportedly picked up $1 billion in a new round led by Sequoia Capital and CapitalG. The financing is said to set an $11 billion valuation for the 7-year-old, New York-based company.

3. Luma AI, $900M, multimedia AI: Silicon Valley-based Luma AI, a startup focused on AI-generated video and imagery, announced that it secured $900 million in a Series C round led by Humain that included significant participation from AMD.

4. Kraken, $800M, cryptocurrency: Cryptocurrency exchange Kraken closed on $800 million in new investment across two tranches. Investors including Jane Street Capital, DRW Venture Capital, HSG, Oppenheimer and Tribe Capital led the primary tranche. Citadel Securities also made a $200 million strategic investment at a $20 billion valuation, per Kraken.

5. Physical Intelligence, $600M, robotics AI: San Francisco-based Physical Intelligence, a developer of AI software to power robots, raised $600 million in a funding round led by CapitalG that reportedly sets a $5.6 valuation for the company. Other investors in the round include Lux Capital, Thrive Capital, Jeff Bezos, Index Ventures and T. Rowe Price.

6. Ramp, $300M, fintech: Expense management provider Ramp landed $300 million in fresh funding led by Lightspeed Venture Partners at a $32 billion valuation. The financing marks the fourth raise for New York-based Ramp in 2025 alone, and brings its total equity raised since its 2019 inception to $2.3 billion, per the company.

7. Function Health, $298M, longevity: Austin-based Function Health, a startup offering lab tests, scans and health data with an eye to extending lifespans, secured $298 million in Series B financing. Redpoint led the round, which set a $2.5 billion valuation for the 3-year-old company.

8. Genspark, $275M, agentic AI: Palo Alto, California-based Genspark, a platform for building agentic AI tools for knowledge workers, announced that it closed on $275 million in a Series B round at a $1.25 billion valuation. The company also said it exceeded $50 million in annualized revenue run rate within five months.

9. Suno, $250M, AI music creation: Suno, an AI platform for producing songs and music, raised $250 million in a Series C financing at a $2.45 billion valuation. Menlo Ventures led the financing for the 3-year-old, Cambridge, Massachusetts-based company.

10. Solve Therapeutics, $120M, biotech: San Diego-based Solve Therapeutics, a developer of therapeutics and diagnostics for treating solid tumor malignancies, raised $120 million in a round led by cancer-focused venture investor Yosemite.

WSJ : Bill Ackman Eyes Simultaneous Public Offerings of Firm and New Fund

Bill Ackman Eyes Simultaneous Public Offerings of Firm and New Fund
Billionaire investor wants to take his hedge-fund management company, Pershing Square, public at the same time as a new closed-end fund next year

  • Bill Ackman is eyeing a dual public offering of his hedge-fund firm, Pershing Square, and a new investment fund, Pershing Square USA, early next year.
  • Investors in Pershing Square USA would receive shares in the management company, Pershing Square, as an incentive.
  • Pershing Square manages approximately $20 billion and its main fund is up 17% this year through Nov. 18.

Bill Ackman is looking to take public his hedge-fund firm, Pershing Square, and a new investment fund simultaneously, according to people familiar with the matter.

He hopes to stage the unique double public offering early next year, the people said.

The Wall Street Journal reported last spring that Ackman was considering an IPO of his investment firm and was raising money from investors as a precursor to an IPO.

Meanwhile, Pershing Square had also filed a prospectus early last year for a new closed-end fund, Pershing Square USA, Ltd., which would be marketed to U.S. individual investors and traded on the New York Stock Exchange. He paused fundraising efforts for that fund in July 2024.

Ackman, long a fan of creative financial maneuvers, is now pursuing what would amount to simultaneous offerings of both, the people said.

Investors who invest in the closed-end fund would receive shares in the management company, Pershing Square, for free, some of the people said. Partners of Pershing Square would give away up to 10% of shares in the firm, which could be valued well over the $10.5 billion valuation it fetched in 2024.

It is always possible the plans will fall apart or that Ackman could change course again. The Financial Times reported earlier Friday that Ackman was preparing a listing of his hedge fund business, without mentioning his other plans.

One of the challenges Ackman acknowledges is the need to generate enthusiasm for Pershing Square USA’s closed-end structure, which has fallen out of favor with investors. Similar funds—including one Ackman listed a decade ago in Europe—trade at a discount to the net value of their holdings.

That is part of the reason he attached shares in the management company as an incentive.

A closed-end fund sells a fixed number of shares in a public offering. Investors can exit only by selling shares to other investors at their price on the open market, regardless of the value of the fund’s investments.

Ackman’s profile has risen beyond Wall Street since he became an outspoken social crusader and aligned himself with figures including President Trump and Elon Musk. That could make his closed-end fund attractive to the general investing public.

Pershing Square manages roughly $20 billion. Once known for activism, it since has transitioned its strategy to focus on concentrated stakes in big public companies. His main fund is up 17% this year through Nov. 18.

Ackman himself has a history of pushing the envelope with novel investment ideas and endeavors, not all of which go according to plan. In 2020, he raised $4 billion in what was the largest-ever IPO for a special-purpose acquisition company but failed to consummate his chosen transaction.

Then in 2023 he got regulators’ blessing for a new investment vehicle, a special-purpose acquisition rights company—a spin on a SPAC he said was more shareholder-friendly. It has yet to announce a deal.

More recently, the firm bought nearly half of the real-estate firm Howard Hughes, which Ackman has envisioned as a modern-day Berkshire Hathaway, referencing the company of his longtime idol, Warren Buffett.

WSJ : How Google Finally Leapfrogged Rivals With New Gemini Rollout

How Google Finally Leapfrogged Rivals With New Gemini Rollout
Top-scoring model’s debut shakes up AI chatbot race: ‘I think we’ve hit on something’

  • Google’s Gemini 3 model surpassed competitors in industry benchmark tests, demonstrating advanced capabilities in AI.
  • Gemini 3’s launch presents a challenge to OpenAI and Anthropic, outperforming them in over a dozen intelligence categories.
  • Google’s market value reached $3.6 trillion, exceeding Microsoft’s for the first time in seven years.

Call it America’s next top model.

With the release of its third version this week, Google’s Gemini large language model surged past ChatGPT and other competitors to become the most capable AI chatbot, as determined by consensus industry-benchmark tests.

The results represent public validation for Google employees who, for months, have been conducting their own, personal tests of the model—asking it for jokes, trying to stump it with math problems—and coming away convinced they had something that would finally tilt the LLM field in the company’s favor.

For one of her “vibe checks,” Tulsee Doshi, Gemini’s senior director of product management, asked the model to write in Gujarati, a language that is spoken widely in India but isn’t especially prevalent on the internet. The results were far better than what she had gotten from earlier models.

“I call it signs of life, right?” she said. “People were coming back and saying, ‘I feel it, I think we’ve hit on something.’”

Aaron Levie, chief executive of the cloud content management company Box, got early access to Gemini 3 late last week, several days ahead of the launch. The company ran its own evaluations of the model over the weekend to see how well it could analyze large sets of complex documents.

“At first we kind of had to squint and be like, ‘OK, did we do something wrong in our eval?’ because the jump was so big,” he said. “But every time we tested it, it came out double-digit points ahead.”

The launch of Gemini 3 has handed Google an elusive victory: The company, for the first time in years, has pulled well ahead in the race to develop artificial intelligence.

The release of its latest AI model this week dazzled users who praised its intelligence, accuracy and creative capabilities. On Thursday, the company said Gemini 3 would power a new version of Nano Banana, a popular image-generation tool that has already driven rapid growth in Gemini usage this year.

The success of the new model poses a significant challenge to OpenAI, Anthropic and other startups vying for AI dominance. Gemini 3 outperformed competing models on more than a dozen benchmark tests scoring a range of intelligence categories.

“They are AI winners, that’s pretty clear,” said MoffettNathanson analyst Michael Nathanson. “I feel pretty good about their hand right now.”

OpenAI’s ChatGPT is still by far the most popular AI chatbot. The company said this month it now has 800 million users each week, compared with Gemini’s 650 million monthly users. And Anthropic’s Claude is widely regarded as one of the leading models for coding. But Gemini 3’s advances have the potential to cement it as a preferred tool for a diverse set of tasks, users and analysts say.

Google has been scrambling to get an edge in the AI race since the launch of ChatGPT three years ago, which stoked fears among investors that the company’s iconic search engine would lose significant traffic to chatbots. The company struggled for months to get traction.

Chief Executive Sundar Pichai and other executives have since worked to overhaul the company’s AI development strategy by breaking down internal silos, streamlining leadership and consolidating work on its models, employees say. Sergey Brin, one of Google’s co-founders, resumed a day-to-day role at the company helping to oversee its AI-development efforts.

During its annual developers conference in May, Google unveiled a suite of sophisticated AI products and a revamped version of its classic search engine featuring AI Mode, which answers search queries in a chatbot-style conversation. It helped some investors gain confidence that the company was mounting a comeback, Nathanson said, but the share price still languished this summer.

“Wall Street was debating whether these guys were going to be AI roadkill,” he said.

Then, in August, the debut of Nano Banana launched Gemini usage on its fastest trajectory to date. Gemini’s 650 million monthly users jumped from 450 million in July.

The company also notched a significant victory in September, when a federal judge declined to levy harsh penalties against the company after earlier finding it maintained an illegal monopoly in the search market. The judge said the competitive dynamics of the market were changing already, largely because of AI.

Google parent Alphabet GOOGL 3.53%increase; green up pointing triangle reported record quarterly revenue last month, largely because of growth in cloud computing and advertising. Its shares are up more than 50% this year and more than 60% since the summer. Its market value this week hit $3.6 trillion, surpassing that of Microsoft for the first time in seven years.

Google aimed to develop Gemini 3 to succeed in some of the most challenging areas of artificial intelligence. The company’s engineers and researchers wanted to improve this model’s ability to “see,” analyze and generate all means of content—text, images, audio, video and code. And they wanted to improve its capacity for thought and reasoning in the interest of building a better personal assistant in coding and other tasks.

After the launch, a table showing Gemini 3’s score on 20 benchmark tests circulated widely online. The model significantly outscored the latest ones from ChatGPT and Anthropic on tests involving expert-level knowledge, logic puzzles, math problems and image recognition. It took second place to Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 4.5 on a single benchmark involving coding.

Google ran some of the tests internally. The rest were done by other companies. Employees spent the weekend before launch in anticipation of getting scores back, some of which were far higher than anticipated.

Doshi said the best surprise was Gemini 3’s high performance on an evaluation called Vending Bench, which tests a model’s ability to think and act over time by asking it to operate a vending machine. The model must track inventory, place orders and set prices in order to make money in the simulation.

“Vending Bench reflects one of the things we were hoping to really shift with this model and push on, which is improved tool use and improved planning,” she said.

As part of the launch, Google began offering subscribers the opportunity to use Gemini 3 in AI Mode, the first time the company integrated a new model into search on day one. The company has plans to make it available soon for everyone in the U.S.

Robby Stein, vice president of product for search, said he worked for months with the Gemini team to determine how the new model could improve the delivery of search-engine results. For one of his vibe checks, he used AI mode to ask for help explaining to his 7-year-old daughter the concept of lift force on an airplane.

He expected a written response. The result: an interactive simulation that showed currents moving over a wing, with a slider allowing him to move the wing, change the currents and lift the plane into the air.

“I was like, ‘Wow, this actually can be capable of presenting information in the best way given the question,’” he said. “That was my main ‘aha’ moment with this product.”

FT : UK start-up Fuse Energy nears new funding at $5bn valuation

UK start-up Fuse Energy nears new funding at $5bn valuation
Company founded by former Revolut executives was valued at $1bn at a fundraise earlier this year

Fuse Energy, a UK start-up founded by former Revolut executives, is in advanced talks to raise new funding at a valuation of about $5bn, which would mark a fivefold increase from when it raised money four months ago.

The company is trying to position itself as a fast-growing player in the UK energy sector by providing cheap power to consumers and developing its own renewable power assets, such as solar panels. It is aiming for $100mn in the latest round, according to people familiar with the matter.

US-based investment fund Lowercarbon Capital is set to lead the round, which will also include the UK’s Balderton Capital, the people said. The firms backed Fuse in an investment round that valued the company at about $1bn in July.

Fuse, founded in 2022, said in a third-quarter update that it served over 200,000 households, who saved as much as £200 annually from its tariffs that seek to beat the UK price cap. The company, which also offers services such as electric vehicle charging, said it was generating $300mn in annual recurring revenue.

Investors in Fuse have been attracted in part by the company’s speed in rolling out new products, one of the people familiar with the process said.

The proposed $5bn valuation for Fuse compares with the $9bn achieved by much bigger rival Octopus Energy when it raised fresh funding last year — a 15 per cent increase from a previous round six months earlier. Octopus reached 10mn retail customers globally last month and has software that it is licensing around the world.

Fuse was founded by chief executive Alan Chang, formerly chief revenue officer at Revolut, and chief operating officer Charles Orr, who was also an executive at the UK financial technology group.

The company previously raised $100mn from venture capital investors including Lakestar, Accel, Creandum and Ribbit. In recent weeks, Fuse said it had built its first solar farm in Hampshire.

Fuse’s increased valuation has come even as some of the UK’s newer energy suppliers have struggled to meet capital adequacy targets.

The targets were introduced by regulator Ofgem to try to prevent a repeat of the energy crisis that began in late 2021 and led to about 30 suppliers collapsing because they could not withstand surging gas prices.

Ovo, one of the largest suppliers in the UK with about 4mn households, has been given more time to meet its capital buffer targets as it seeks to raise funding, the Financial Times reported earlier this month.

Lowercarbon, led by managing partner Chris Sacca, has invested in other British companies such as the carbon removal registry Isometric. Balderton was one of the earliest backers of Revolut and a top early backer of Fuse.

Fuse and Balderton declined to comment, while Lowercarbon did not respond to a request for comment.

FT : Real Madrid plots ownership shake-up to stay ahead of Premier League rivals

Real Madrid plots ownership shake-up to stay ahead of Premier League rivals
Member-owned Spanish club could bring in external investors as some fans voice opposition to idea of a stake sale

Real Madrid president Florentino Pérez will this weekend push ahead with plans to bring in outside shareholders for the first time in the member-owned club’s 123-year history, as the Spanish team tries to reinforce its status against the growing financial might of Premier League clubs.

At Sunday’s annual meeting of members, Pérez is to outline the next steps of a plan to bring fresh capital into the club. That would allow an outside investor to take a 5 to 10 per cent stake in Real Madrid, in a test of the club’s valuation, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

While the meeting is a standard event, where members will vote to approve the annual accounts, Pérez’s speech will be closely watched for updates on potential changes to the club’s corporate structure, the way capital will be raised and the effect on members.

Changes to the bylaws will require members to meet and vote, potentially as soon as next year.

The stakes are high following US investment firm Apollo’s deal this month to buy a majority stake in Real’s rivals Atlético Madrid, valuing the club at more than €2bn.

English Premier League clubs vastly outspent their Spanish rivals on new players this summer, upping the financial stakes for competitors in the Champions League, a tournament Real Madrid has won more times than any other club.

The move is also a critical step in cementing the legacy of Pérez, a billionaire businessman whose identity in Spain is tied directly to his running of the club.

People close to Pérez say the changes are intended to create a sense of ownership and accountability among members and a major investor to safeguard the club’s future.

Like rival FC Barcelona, Real Madrid remains owned by about 100,000 individual members, or socios.

Pérez’s plan is to write into the bylaws that a stake of up to 10 per cent can be sold to private investors, keeping the club’s future in members’ hands, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

The person denied the possibility that the move could result in taxes for the socios because of the plan to change the business structure. Under its current corporate structure, Real Madrid is a non-profit that must reinvest in its own business.

However, some Real Madrid supporters are already voicing their opposition. Miguel Otero, a club fan and political economist at the Elcano Royal Institute, said: “Real Madrid should not be for sale. Not 10 per cent, not even 1 per cent. It should belong to its members 100 per cent. This is what makes Real Madrid unique.”

Arguing that the club was “founded on trust and loyalty”, he added: “It should remain this way. By selling even a small percentage it puts a market value on Real Madrid. But this sets a bad precedent — Real Madrid is invaluable.”

The plan is the latest gambit by Pérez, who failed in an audacious but widely lambasted move to form a breakaway European Super League in 2021.

Fans, rival clubs and politicians united in opposition to his proposal to upend the way football is run in favour of a closed format competition inspired by US sports leagues. Real Madrid remains at loggerheads with European governing body Uefa, which runs the Champions League. A22 Sports Management, which has close ties to Real Madrid, has argued for structural changes to engage younger fans and strengthen clubs’ finances.

Pérez also oversaw the €1.2bn renovation of Real Madrid’s Bernabéu stadium, a costly project that has been roiled by complaints from neighbours. The revamp was intended to turn the Bernabéu into a world-class concert venue, but local complaints about noise from performances by the likes of Taylor Swift have forced the club to pause all music plans indefinitely.

Pérez, who is also executive chair of construction company Grupo ACS, is preparing to test Real Madrid’s valuation in what is expected to be a lengthy process to reconfigure the club’s ownership model.

The 15-times Uefa Champions League winners, who boast a star-studded squad including French talisman Kylian Mbappé, England’s Jude Bellingham and Brazil’s Vinícius Júnior, makes more revenue than any other club, surpassing €1.1bn in 2024-25.

Earlier this year, consultancy Football Benchmark valued Real Madrid at €6.3bn including debt, higher than any other club and well north of the €5.1bn ascribed to second-placed Manchester City. Pérez floated a valuation of more than €10bn at last year’s shareholder meeting.

Real Madrid’s model makes it more complicated to raise capital. Even so, the club has strong ties to the financial industry. It worked with JPMorgan on the European Super League proposal and the Bernabéu renovation, and raised €360mn through a stadium partnership with US investment firm Sixth Street in 2022.

Real Madrid’s socios model stands out as private capital firms clamour for European football leagues and clubs. Clearlake Capital provided most of the capital for a £2.5bn takeover of English side Chelsea FC in 2022 — the same year RedBird Capital Partners bought Italy’s AC Milan in a €1.2bn deal. Oaktree seized rivals Inter Milan last year after its previous owner failed to repay debt. Apollo’s swoop for Atlético Madrid followed this year.

Pérez was first elected as Real Madrid president in 2000, signing “Galactico” players including Zinedine Zidane, winning the Champions League two years later and transforming the club into a commercial powerhouse until his departure in 2006. He returned three years later, signed Portuguese forward Cristiano Ronaldo for £80mn and has gone on to win Europe’s biggest trophy another six times.

WSJ : Starbucks Faces a New Rival That Won’t Let Up

Starbucks Faces a New Rival That Won’t Let Up
China’s Luckin opened its first stores in New York, showing off its mobile app and low prices, areas where Starbucks has struggled

  • Luckin Coffee, China’s biggest coffee chain, opened its first U.S. stores in Manhattan, close to Starbucks locations.
  • Luckin’s strategy involves mobile app orders, coupons, and quick service, reminiscent of its disruptive approach in China.
  • a After overcoming an accounting scandal, Luckin is challenging Starbucks, which is also undergoing changes to improve service.

Luckin Coffee could have opened its first stores anywhere in America. China’s biggest coffee chain chose a New York City spot less than 200 feet from a Starbucks.

From there, Luckin is serving up coffee drinks from a flat white to a raspberry cold brew, really fast, ordered on its mobile app whose coupons may be as addictive as caffeine.

Armed with iced coconut lattes, it has the makings of a deliciously audacious corporate rivalry. Luckin has just two U.S. stores, which opened June 30 in Manhattan, compared with Starbucks’s 17,000 U.S. locations. Then again, in China, Luckin didn’t exist when Starbucks arrived and spread coffee culture—and it overtook Starbucks in six years.

“This is just the beginning,” Luckin said on Instagram. “NYC, we’re here.”

That Luckin has appeared in New York is pretty amazing. The company was left for dead in 2020 after an accounting scandal during which it faked more than $300 million in sales. That was the last time it made news in the U.S. Now, it’s on Starbucks’s home turf just as the American coffee giant is trying to turn around under new leadership after five consecutive quarters of declining same-store sales.

Founded by Chinese tech entrepreneurs, Luckin is a master of the gamification that is common among Asian retailers. Luckin customers must order on its app, where they are showered with coupons, including $1.99 drinks for first-timers in New York. The app gives a pickup time and texts when the drink is ready (three-minute and five-minute waits on two recent morning orders). Customers pick up their drinks at the counter without having to interact with another person.

Mobile app orders have been maddening for Starbucks leadership. Customers coming in to pick up their mobile orders were overwhelming its cafes (“a mosh pit,” as Starbucks founder Howard Schultz complained) and spoiled the leisurely, premium vibe Starbucks thrives on. Still, they fueled much of the chain’s business.

When new Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol joined the company almost a year ago, he was frank: Mobile orders needed a makeover. Niccol said that he would better separate mobile pickup queues from cafe dwellers, and place some limits on how much people could doctor their drinks. More than 30% of Starbucks pickup orders are placed digitally.

Trainer Unsworth, a 23-year-old tech salesman, tried Luckin in New York. He returned the next day for an iced latte. The latte had more of a milky taste than a coffee taste, but he didn’t mind. He plans to come back as long as the app keeps feeding him coupons.

“Coffee is getting a little too expensive right now,” said Unsworth, who usually pays about $6 for his coffee elsewhere. His Luckin iced latte was closer to $2.

Luckin didn’t respond to requests seeking comment. Starbucks said, “We are doubling down on what customers have always loved about Starbucks—a warm and welcoming coffeehouse with high-quality beverages crafted by a skilled barista.”

Luckin likely wouldn’t even exist if not for Starbucks. The American chain spread the idea of sipping lattes and lounging in cafes to China when it opened its first store in Beijing in 1999, bringing coffee culture to the traditionally tea-drinking country.

About two decades later, in 2017, entrepreneurs from ride-hailing platform UCAR, Jenny Qian and Charles Lu, founded Luckin, part of a Chinese tech funding boom that propelled companies like TikTok-parent ByteDance and Jack Ma’s Ant Group. Luckin’s Chinese name, Ruixing, generally translates to “auspicious luck.”

From the start, Luckin was a tech native. It built its strategy around a mobile app with the idea of having coffee available at any moment, through grab-and-go stores and speedy delivery. Stores were smaller than Starbucks’s locations and they offered steep discounts.

Profitability was less a concern than grabbing market share. It opened thousands of shops across China at a blinding pace—many just feet away from a Starbucks—and went public in less than two years.

“The market won’t only have Starbucks. Every country has their own coffee brand,” Qian told Chinese state media in 2018.

Its meteoric rise came crashing down when the accounting scandal forced it to delist from the Nasdaq Stock Market in 2020 and pay a $180 million settlement with U.S. regulators. Luckin ousted Lu and Qian, its then chairman and chief executive, and later filed for bankruptcy.

Jinyi Guo, an executive in charge of product and supply chain, took over as CEO. Beijing-based private-equity firm Centurium Capital, Luckin’s largest shareholder and one of its earliest financial backers, poured money into the company to clean up the mess.

“We are trying to redeem ourselves because we want to repair the reputation of Chinese companies,” Guo told The Wall Street Journal in a 2022 interview.

By 2023, Luckin overtook Starbucks as China’s biggest coffee chain by sales. That year, Luckin had about 16,200 stores in China—more than double Starbucks’s 6,800 locations in the country.

Today, Luckin has more than 24,000 stores across mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. Many, especially in smaller cities, are just the size of kiosks. Luckin this year secured the exclusive rights to coconuts from a group of islands in Indonesia to use in its signature coconut latte.

“While cultivating coffee consumption habits, we aim to allow more customers to conveniently enjoy high-quality coffee experiences at very competitive prices, striving to make high-quality coffee become a part of everyone’s daily life,” Guo said on an earnings call in February.

Its New York menu includes an iced coconut latte, pineapple cold brew, iced matcha latte, iced velvet latte and Pink Sunrise, made with coconut milk, mango juice and strawberry sweet cold foam.

Like Starbucks, Luckin lets customers customize their drinks, but has somewhat fewer options. The Luckin app offers six types of milk for an iced latte, for example, and Starbucks has 11.

Luckin has plotted its U.S. entry since at least last year, when it told investors that it was evaluating opportunities to expand to America. The company said it knew the U.S. would be a tough market to crack.

“Given the maturity, saturation and the competitiveness of the U.S. coffee market, we are intending to approach our expansion strategies there with careful consideration,” Luckin’s Guo said in an October 2024 investor call.

Luckin recently hired or was seeking to fill at least a dozen corporate roles in Secaucus, N.J., and the broader New York metropolitan area, according to LinkedIn profiles, posts and job listings.


China, Starbucks’s second largest market, has become a headache for the company. Its market share fell to 14% in 2024, from more than 40% in 2017, as competition from Luckin and other local rivals grew, according to Bernstein Research. Starbucks is evaluating alternatives for its business, such as bringing on a local partner to help run it. Executives have said they remain committed to China and efforts to turn around the operation are starting to work.

Adding to the competition, ousted Luckin co-founders Lu and Qian started a new coffee chain, Cotti Coffee, in 2022 and it now has more stores in China than Starbucks, according to Bernstein. Cotti has also entered the U.S., including a few stores in New York it opened weeks before Luckin.

In China, Starbucks last month cut prices for more than 20 beverages, with the average decrease of a grande drink declining by 70 cents. The cuts are working, Starbucks said. New drink styles, like sugar-free options, are also broadening Starbucks’s customer base and increasing sales, particularly in the afternoons and evenings.

“We try not to get distracted by things we can’t control, like who’s entering the market,” said Brady Brewer, CEO of Starbucks International, in a prior interview. “If we do our best to deliver coffee, our coffeehouse environment and great customer service, we usually win.”

For fiscal year 2024, Starbucks logged $36.2 billion in revenue, while Luckin reported $4.7 billion. Starbucks has a market value of about $106 billion; Luckin’s is around $10 billion.

In the U.S., Starbucks is pushing to return to being a place where people will pay premium prices for a cafe experience. Starbucks has struggled with speed, particularly as an increasing number of consumers have customized their drinks with syrups, foams and other additions. Niccol said earlier this year that about half of in-store orders take longer than four minutes. Technology rolling out in the U.S. is helping it shave an average of two minutes off wait times for in-store orders, helping it reach service time goals of four minutes for its cafe and drive-through business.

On a recent Thursday morning in New York, Hailey Schindler and Tracy Fernandez tried Luckin for the first time. Schindler, 26, got a “Pink Sunrise,” a mango, coconut and strawberry drink. Fernandez, 27, ordered a blood-orange cold brew. The two, who work together at a creative agency across the street from Luckin, typically go out for coffee at Starbucks or Dunkin’ a few times a week. Both said they would go back to Luckin.

“They have a lot of really neat flavors I’ve never had,” Schindler said.

A sign advertising $1.99 coffee lured Danny Goldberg, a 31-year-old motivational speaker, into the store the week after it opened. He downloaded Luckin’s app and ordered a coconut cold brew. He liked the quick, cashierless system.

Enticed by more coupons in the app, Goldberg returned the next day with his wife, 8-month-old baby and golden retriever to get another coconut cold brew, also for around $2. Since then, he has made six more visits and told his friends about Luckin.

Bernstein analysts noted the number of repeat customers they found at the two New York pilot stores, and Luckin’s heavy discounting. They estimate Luckin will be able to achieve profitability in the U.S. at the store level in the next 12 to 18 months if sales volumes increase and discounts moderate. The store number of its second U.S. location—written on the corner of the counter—wasn’t 2. It was 00002. That, the analysts said, is a hint that Luckin has ambitions to become bigger in the U.S.