>>> Mediaset, Sky Italia in talks over Premium deal

Mediaset, Sky Italia in talks over Premium deal 
Italian broadcaster Mediaset and pay-TV rival Sky Italia are in contact over a potential agreement involving Mediaset's pay-TV unit Premium after its aborted sale to Vivendi, according to two unnamed sources cited by Reuters. "There has been contact to understand what to do beyond 2018," said one source, referring to the need to submit a joint bid for costly Champions League and Serie A football rights that expire in 2018 and are due for auction in the first half of 2017. However, the parties can’t begin formal talks until Mediaset and France’s Vivendi resolve their legal battle over their collapsed deal, added another source.
In that regard, Mediaset has announced that it’s dropped an urgent request for a court to order the seizure of a 3.5 percent stake in Vivendi just before the first hearing due on 23 November. In a statement Mediaset said it had received assurances that its contractual rights wouldn’t be jeopardised but would still continue with its separate legal action against Vivendi on grounds of the significant potential damages to its business arising from Vivendi’s decision to abort the original sale agreement.

(MAKOR) - Share Class Report


 

MAKOR - Share Class Report

 

Over past week, we didn’t implement any trades but we’re happy with the recent trades we pushed:

 

• The short TITR / TIT is up 165 bps over the past week, we think this can continue

 

• The RDSA / B is up 32 bps. We continue to like this spread, as a value with catalyst one. 

 

• The RYAAY US vs RYA also did ok (+80 bps), we ‘re getting close to unwind levels (109% and above).

 

 

This week, we’d refocus on the UHR / UHRN.

 

• We think the spread is coming back to setup levels.

 

• Swatch has been clearly a massive underperformer over the medium term vs Richemont, LVMH or even Kering.

 

• We estimate the odds of a rebound of Swatch share price are significant, hence UHR’s move should be quicker and bigger than UHRN’s (less liquid)

 

Have a great start of week, 

 

 

 

  

  ​     ​     ​

 

Makor Capital

 

11 Menachem Begin St., 26th FL

Ramat Gan 52681
ISRAEL
Tel         +972 3 5453 762

Fax        +972 3 7162 680

 

   

Research Disclaimer

 

This publication has been prepared by Makor Capital Limited (“Makor Capital”) and is intended for professional or qualified investors only. Makor Securities London Ltd (“Makor Securities”)is distributing this material to its clients who are Eligible Counterparties or Professional Clients under FCA Rules. It may also be disseminated to persons who are Investment Professionals within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion Order 2005).  In the United States, Makor Capital only distributes this material to major US institutional investors (as that term is defined in Rule 15a-6 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934) and to SEC-registered broker-dealers or  banks acting in a broker–dealer capacity. This material is not intended for distribution to any other persons and should not be redistributed.  If you do not fall into any of these categories you should disregard it.

 

This material is a marketing communication.  It is not investment research and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. It is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research under U.K. law. This material is not a research report and is not intended to be a research report as defined under U.S. securities laws and regulations.  This material is not intended to provide information reasonably sufficient upon which to base any investment decision.   

 

This material does not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs of individual clients or other recipients. Before acting on this material, clients and other recipients should consider whether it is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice. 

 

This material should not be construed in any circumstances as an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy any security or other financial instrument, nor shall it, or the fact of its distribution, form the basis of, or be relied upon in connection with, any contract relating to such action. 

 

In the United States, Makor Capital does not offer securities services to U.S. persons except pursuant to SEC Rule 15a-6 only to major US institutional investors and SEC registered broker-dealers or  banks acting in a broker–dealer capacity. Transactions in the United States must be effected through the U.S. broker-dealer, Oscar Gruss & Son Incorporated. Oscar Gruss & Son has not prepared, reviewed or distributed this material.

 

Some of this material is produced by providers which Makor Securities believes to be reliable, but Makor Securities does not warrant or represent (expressly or impliedly) that it is accurate, complete, not misleading or as to its fitness for the purpose intended and it should not be relied upon as such. 

Opinions expressed will be the current opinions of those producing this material as of the date appearing on this material only. We expect those producing the material in  this publication to update it on a timely basis but can give no undertaking that they will do so and regulatory compliance or other reasons may prevent  them from doing so (or us from disseminating updated material).  

 

Members and employees of Makor Securities London Ltd, employees of Makor Capital, Makor Capital Markets may from time to time have long or short positions in securities, warrants, futures, options, derivatives or other financial instruments referred to in this material. For Makor Securities, this information is set out in our Conflicts of Interest Policy which is available on request.  Policies for the production of research from other research providers are available on request.  Unless otherwise stated, share prices provided within this material are as at the close of business on the day prior to the date of the material.

 

Neither the whole nor any part of this material may be duplicated in any form or by any means. Neither should any of this material be redistributed or disclosed to anyone without prior consent. This material is issued for general information and discussion purposes only. None of  Makor Securities, Makor Capital, Makor Capital Markets accepts  liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage of any kind arising out of the use of all or any of this material. 

 

The services, securities and investments discussed in this material may not be available to, nor are suitable for all investors. Investors should make their own investment decisions based upon their own financial objectives and financial resources and it should be noted that investment involves risk, including the risk of capital loss. Past performance is no guide to future performance. In relation to securities denominated in foreign currency, movements in exchange rates will have an effect on the value, either favourable or unfavourable.

 

All investors. Investors should make their own investment decisions based upon their own financial objectives and financial resources and it should be noted that investment involves risk, including the risk of capital loss. Past performance is no guide to future performance. In relation to securities denominated in foreign currency, movements in exchange rates will have an effect on the value, either favourable or unfavourable.

 

Entities

 

Makor Securities London Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct

Authority (FCA registration number 625054) 

 

Makor Capital, company number 514456466, is incorporated in Israel and is a 100% held

subsidiary of Makor Holdings Pte Ltd incorporated in Singapore. 

 

Makor Capital Markets SA, company number CH-660.2.999.011-0 is incorporated in Switzerland

and is also a 100% held subsidiary of Makor Holdings Pte Ltd.

 


Having trouble viewing this email? Click here


This email was sent to lchekroun@makor-cm.com by Research@Makor-Capital.com

Update Profile/Email Address | Unsubscribe | Report abuse


 V.I.Plus e-mail marketing

 

FT : Study finds active global equity funds outperform

Study finds active global equity funds outperform
Research shows international stockpickers beat the market by 1.2 per cent annually

Portfolio managers who promise expertise in actively selecting shares have long been accused of failing to beat the performance of cheaper funds that track an index, but a new study argues that some stockpickers do add value.

According to academic research seen by FTfm, actively managed global equity funds outperformed the market by between 1.2 per cent and 1.4 per cent annually on average between 2002 and 2012.

The findings are likely to provide comfort for some active fund managers who have come under repeated attack from academics, campaigners and research providers for underperforming their benchmarks.

Earlier this year, research by S&P Dow Jones, the index provider, found that 99 per cent of actively managed US equity funds sold in Europe failed to beat the S&P 500 over the past 10 years.

However, the authors of the latest research, which will be published online today, argued that in specific circumstances active management can pay off.

They wrote: “Our results suggest that active management is worth considering in global equity markets.”

The research did not subtract the fees investors are charged from the performance figures, but it said pension funds and other big investors typically pay fees of around 0.75 per cent. This would leave those investors with a net gain of at least 0.45 per cent annually over 10 years.

Retail investors often pay higher fees.

David Gallagher, lead author of the study and a professor at the Australia Business School at the University of New South Wales, said the study shows active equity funds that invest globally “generate an economically significant outperformance”.

According to the study, the excess returns of global equity funds primarily came from managers’ stock selection skills, while allocations to emerging markets also helped boost performance.

Professor David Blake, director of the Pensions Institute at London’s Cass Business School, said he was “a little surprised by the results, in particular the size of the outperformance”, but he cautioned that the study could be prone to so-called selection bias — where only good funds report their performance.

Prof Gallagher’s study, which was co-written by Graham Harman, Camille Schmidt and Geoffrey Warren, included 143 global equity funds that were managed for institutional investors. The funds were assigned a benchmark of either the MSCI World index or the MSCI All Country World index.

Tim Edwards, senior director of index investment strategy at S&P Global, said: “If you have the ability to pick a skilful manager and they are going to charge you a low fee, then that is clearly a better option.

“But there are two big challenges. In most markets the average manager is not enough. Most of the time you have to have a good one and it is often really hard to find a good manager. You also need to have a low fee for this to work. You can’t ignore fees.”

S&P’s research found that few global equity funds available for retail investors outperform the market after fees.

The index provider’s research, as well as numerous academic studies, have heaped pressure on active managers and driven the rapid growth of the passive fund industry, which can provide lower-cost exposure to markets, in recent years.

Figures from Morningstar, the data provider, showed that, in the nine months to the end of September, investors put $35bn into passive equity funds that invest globally but pulled almost $20bn from actively managed equivalents.

Stephen Mitchell, head of strategy for global equities at Jupiter, the UK-listed fund manager, agreed investors benefit from active stock picking when it comes to global equity funds.

“Active management has had a relatively bad press. But we still believe that stock picking is key to active management and it will add value,” he said.

WSJ : Why Saudi Arabia’s Oil Giant Aims to Be Big in Chemicals, Too

Why Saudi Arabia’s Oil Giant Aims to Be Big in Chemicals, Too
Aramco’s plans to vastly expand its petrochemical operations are part of the kingdom’s effort to remake its economy as oil’s future clouds

GELEEN, Netherlands—Saudi Arabian Oil Co. has been the world’s single largest crude producer for decades. It wants to be a lot more than that now, as a new petrochemical complex shows.
Among the Dutch corn fields here is a tangle of pipes, vats and catalyzers that the company uses in its Arlanxeo plant to transform what was oil into synthetic rubber for products ranging from auto-engine hoses to plastic wine corks.
Aramco, as it is commonly known, until recently focused on pumping great quantities of oil and, like the Standard Oil companies of John D. Rockefeller, processing it through its refineries. Aramco now aims to vastly expand its petrochemical operations, turning itself into a modern integrated energy company along the lines of Exxon MobilCorp.

Thousands of miles away, near the Saudi Arabian city of Al Jubail on the Persian Gulf, an army of workers is finishing the $20 billion Sadara petrochemical complex, an Aramco joint venture with Dow Chemical Co. Sadara will use ethane refined by Aramco nearby to make a petrochemical called butadiene to ship world-wide to facilities, likely including its Dutch plant.

Saudi Arabia oil productionSaudi government takes control of its domestic oil industry by purchasing a 25% stake in Aramco, which it increases to 60% in 1974.

Aramco, one of the world’s most powerful and secretive companies, is undergoing an unprecedented makeover, as the oil-price rout hurts its revenue and uncertainty clouds the future of fossil-fuel demand.
Its transformation is intertwined with a long-term plan to diversify the Saudi economy. That plan, led by a powerful deputy crown prince who wants his nation to grow beyond being a petrostate, is accelerating the Aramco shift in ways now becoming clear. By positioning the company to generate more domestic jobs and non-oil revenue, Aramco aims to help provide the funding needed to carry out the prince’s vision.
Aramco’s strategic goal is to create a global network of refining and petrochemical plants that let Saudi Arabia turn its biggest asset into hundreds of higher-value products crucial to modern life, from chewing gum to auto parts.
To extract capital from oil still in the ground, Aramco plans another ambitious gambit: an initial public offering in 2018 that may become history’s biggest. Aramco says it has 261.6 billion barrels of oil left to pump, roughly 20 times as much as Exxon Mobil.
“Aramco’s capabilities will be fully unleashed,” Saudi oil minister and Aramco Chairman Khalid al-Falih said in a briefing with several reporters this year. “The company will be able to go global in multiple ways.”
Khalid Al-Falih, Saudi Arabia's oil minister and Aramco’s chairman, attended a September forum in Tokyo on the kingdom’s plan to diversify its economy. PHOTO:TOMOHIRO OHSUMI/BLOOMBERG NEWS
Aramco declined to answer detailed questions, referring instead to speeches such as one by Aramco Chief Executive Amin Nasser in September. He signaled why the company was interested in a growing petrochemical industry. He said the Gulf region was home to only 2.5% of global petrochemical revenue and less than 1% of the industry’s jobs.
“Considering the Gulf’s endowment of oil and gas, as well as our geographic proximity to major markets in Europe and Asia,” he said, “both those figures should be much, much higher.”
New jobs, revenue
Aramco’s moves position it for a future when crude demand may peak and when owning reserves won’t be as attractive. Even if electric-vehicle adoption and alternative-fuel use soar, cutting global thirst for fuel, demand for petrochemicals is likely to remain strong. By developing more chemical manufacturing of its own, Aramco could attract jobs and revenue to the kingdom, which recently issued $17.5 billion in bonds to shore up its finances.

Aramco’s reinvention as a public company invested in producing gasoline, diesel and specialty chemicals could mean abdicating Saudi Arabia’s traditional role as de facto head of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Historically, the kingdom, through Aramco, has opened the spigot when prices rise too high and restricted supply when they fall too far. To do this, Aramco has kept unused spare production capacity, which shareholders would frown on, say some oil-industry consultants.
It isn’t clear how much of the change will come to pass at Aramco or in the Saudi economy. The government relies on oil for the vast majority of its revenue and has for decades talked about needing to diversify, without much change.
Richard Mallinson at Energy Aspects, a London global-energy-market consultant, says he thinks the diversification plan “will fall a long way short of the lofty ambitions” and “is just too much of a jump from where they are today.”
The strategy of directly owning more petrochemical plants to create outlets for crude and refined products has long been pursued by large firms such as Exxon Mobil and Royal Dutch Shell PLC. “Aramco is the powerhouse in the area of oil. They want to get bigger in chemistry,” says Matthias Zachert, chairman of Aramco’s German joint-venture partner Lanxess AG. “But you don’t create a leading chemical company overnight.”

Several advisers involved in the IPO planning say the transformation will be so complex it could go beyond 2018. The 5% stake targeted for the IPO is so large—Aramco has been valued at $2 trillion to $3 trillion—that finding a deep enough pool of investors may require Aramco to float the stock on several stock exchanges and to face multiple sets financial-disclosure rules, they say. It is a special challenge for bankers, they say, because the company and the kingdom are so deeply intertwined in ways that aren’t public.
A prince’s role
The company has said it will begin disclosing financial statements in 2017. Its operations are shrouded in secrecy and wouldn't meet governance requirements of most exchanges, such as board diversity. Its board includes no women and few outsiders.
King Salman bin Abdulaziz has already shaken up the kingdom’s ruling elite by empowering his son, Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman. Prince Mohammed is moving ahead with a plan drawn up by McKinsey & Co. consultants to wean the country off its oil dependence. In May, he proposed the IPO and the transfer of proceeds to a sovereign-wealth fund that will invest in other sectors.
Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman is moving ahead with a plan to wean Saudi Arabia off its oil dependence. PHOTO: CHARLES PLATIAU/REUTERS
By taking on the transformation, the 31-year-old Prince Mohammed is challenging the established order in ways that could prove difficult to implement, say people close to the current establishment. Even giving shareholders partial control over Saudi Arabia’s oil reserves would be tough because taking control of those assets was a defining moment for the kingdom.
The prince is working with Mr. Falih, Aramco’s chairman, and a tight circle of advisers to map out the future of Aramco and the Saudi economy, say people familiar with the discussions. They are making many decisions surrounding Aramco with little input from the company’s bureaucracy, these people say.
Members of the company’s board learned of the IPO plans from media reports, rather than from Mr. Falih or Mr. Nasser, Aramco’s CEO, one Aramco official says. “In some occasions even the chief executive is not fully aware of the latest update,” the official says of Mr. Nasser. Aramco didn't make Mr. Nasser, Mr. Falih or other executives available for interviews. A spokesman for the prince declined to comment.
Aramco owns directly or through joint ventures plants capable of processing 5.4 million barrels a day in markets that are its biggest crude customers: the U.S., South Korea, Japan, China and Saudi Arabia.
Making Aramco’s integrated model more lucrative, its operating costs for extracting oil remain among the world’s lowest—perhaps $6 a barrel, compared with an average of $10 in Texas’ Permian Basin, according to oil consultant Wood Mackenzie.
“The idea of control of the end market is very important to them,” says Anas Alhajji, an independent energy economist in Dallas. “This is their outlet to the market.”
Aramco presented an exhibit at a September conference in Bahrain for the refining and petrochemical industries, fields in which the Saudi company is expanding. PHOTO:HAMAD I MOHAMMED/REUTERS
That philosophy led Aramco earlier this year to break up a strategic partnership: Motiva, its two-decade-old joint venture with Shell. A key asset was a Port Arthur, Texas, refinery, North America’s largest.
Motiva had begun buying American crude oil, which was competing with Saudi oil, say people familiar with the Motiva relationship.
Shell spokesman Ray Fisher says ending such a long venture with numerous assets and liabilities is “a very complex process, involving various adjustments and changes along the way before final agreements can be reached.”
The breakup will let Aramco cement its U.S. foothold. From Port Arthur, it could ship gasoline, jet fuel and diesel to military bases in Virginia, airports in the Washington, D.C., area and service stations in New York.
The split will free Aramco from certain limits imposed by the Motiva deal, allowing it to expand, for instance, on the West Coast. The Saudi company has looked at buying a large refinery along the Gulf Coast or a stake in a refinery, say people familiar with the company.
Aramco is negotiating with the Malaysian national oil company, Petronas, to work together on a $21 billion refining-and-petrochemicals project near Singapore, The Wall Street Journal reported in October. The project would operate as a joint venture and serve as another major Asian beachhead for Saudi oil.
Aramco owns a stake in the giant Fujian Refining & Petrochemical complex, supplying oil that is turned into gasoline and plastics for China.
Aramco’s roots
Aramco has its roots in Texaco and Standard Oil of California, which formed a partnership that found enormous oil deposits on the Arabian Peninsula. In the early 1970s, the kingdom bought a stake in Aramco and by the 1980s had acquired it all.
In 1991, Aramco began looking overseas when it bought a stake in a South Korean refiner. In terms that Aramco would repeat, it agreed to supply the refinery with crude for two decades. Over the years, it bought and built more refineries.
Still, Aramco remained a company almost entirely focused on producing crude. The first inklings of a new strategy emerged in 2011 when Aramco and Dow Chemical agreed to create Sadara, among the world’s largest petrochemical complexes.
After signing the deal, Mr. Falih, then Aramco’s CEO, explained his vision. Aramco, he said, will “become the world’s leading integrated energy company by the year 2020.”
Aramco for decades has been the world’s largest crude producer, pumping from oil fields through complexes such as this one in shown in 2003 in Shaybah, Saudi Arabia.PHOTO: REZA/GETTY IMAGES
Saudi Arabian crude sales faced new pressures starting in about 2012 as Nigeria and Angola, forced out of the U.S. market by a flood of shale oil, began competing with Aramco in Asia. Demand was stagnating, and countries were moving to limit fossil-fuel use.
Soon after oil prices began falling in 2014, Mr. Zachert, chairman of Lanxess, the chemical firm, suggested a European deal with Aramco. “They saw the strong strategic rationale,” he says. “The transaction was completed in record time.”
Aramco paid $1.2 billion to Lanxess to cleave off half the German company and create a partnership, Arlanxeo, 50%-owned by Aramco and based in a Netherlands industrial park dubbed Chemelot.
Three Aramco executives moved to Holland to help run a company with 20 factories in Latin America, North America, Europe and Asia. “They’re very interested in how we do things,” says Jan Paul de Vries,the Lanxess executive who heads the venture.
Arlanxeo’s synthetic-rubber facility is a neat fit for the Sadara project, which shipped its first chemicals in December. When fully running, Sadara will be able to supply feedstock to Arlanxeo. The plant is a key link between Aramco’s aspiration of building a petrochemical empire and the kingdom’s diversification plan.
One recent afternoon, workers wearing protective masks painted arrows on new roads near the complex’s edge. Beyond a chain-link fence, trucks lined a half-built road on a patch of desert that is part of a planned five-square-mile industrial park.
The goal is to attract manufacturers that would use Sadara’s chemical output while benefiting from the infrastructure. That would complete a circle, allowing Aramco to use its oil extraction, refining and processing chain to supply more Saudi-based manufacturing—one of eight sectors the economic-diversification plan targets for expansion.
Robert W. Jordan, U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia under PresidentGeorge W. Bush, says changes Aramco is making are preparing the country to depart from the past.
“Saudi Arabia may have enough oil for the oil age,” he says. “But the oil age may be ending.”

WSJ : The EU’s New Bomb Is Ticking in the Netherlands

The EU’s New Bomb Is Ticking in the Netherlands
A referendum law has given Dutch euroskeptics a powerful tool to block deeper European integration, and then some, Simon Nixon writes

THE HAGUE—If the European dream is to die, it may be the Netherlands that delivers the fatal blow. The Dutch general election in March is shaping up to be a defining moment for the European project.

The risk to the European Union doesn’t come from Geert Wilders, the leader of anti-EU, anti-immigration Party for Freedom. He is well ahead in the polls and looks destined to benefit from many of the social and economic factors that paved the way for the Brexit and Trump revolts.

But the vagaries of the Dutch political system make it highly unlikely that Mr. Wilders will find his way into government. As things stand, he is predicted to win just 29 out of the 150 seats in the new parliament, and mainstream parties seem certain to shun him as a coalition partner. In an increasingly fragmented Dutch political landscape, most observers agree that the likely outcome of the election is a coalition of four or five center-right and center-left parties.

Instead, the risk to the EU comes instead from a new generation of Dutch euroskeptics who are less divisive and concerned about immigration but more focused on questions of sovereignty—and utterly committed to the destruction of the EU. Its leading figures are Thierry Baudet and Jan Roos, who have close links to British euroskeptics. They have already scored one significant success: In 2015, they persuaded the Dutch parliament to adopt a law that requires the government to hold a referendum on any law if 300,000 citizens request it. They then took advantage of this law at the first opportunity to secure a vote that rejected the EU’s proposed trade and economic pact with Ukraine, which Brussels saw as a vital step in supporting a strategically important neighbor.

This referendum law is a potential bomb under the EU, as both Dutch politicians and Brussels officials are well aware. Mr. Baudet believes he now has the means to block any steps the EU might seek to take to deepen European integration or stabilize the eurozone if they require Dutch legislation. This could potentially include aid to troubled Southern European countries such as Greece and Italy, rendering the eurozone unworkable.

Indeed, the Dutch government gave a further boost to Mr. Baudet and his allies when it agreed to accept the outcome of the Ukraine referendum if turnout was above 30%, even though it was under no legal obligation to do so. This was a major concession to the euroskeptics, as became clear when strong turnout among their highly motivated supporters lifted overall turnout to 31%. With Mr. Wilders’s party, currently polling above 25%, and both Mr. Baudet and Mr. Roos having launched their own parties, Dutch euroskeptics are confident they will be able to reach the 30% threshold in future referendums.

From the rest of the EU’s perspective, the central question of the election is whether mainstream Dutch parties can find a way to defuse this bomb. That won’t be easy.

The first challenge is to find a way out of the Ukraine impasse. Prime Minister Mark Rutte remains committed to ratifying the deal but he needs to do so in a way that won’t expose him to charges of ignoring the referendum result, thereby stoking euroskeptic support. Dutch, EU and Ukrainian negotiators will sit down next week and try to hammer out a legally binding clarification that makes clear that the agreement doesn’t include military assistance and doesn’t offer a path to Ukraine’s EU membership.

But even if the rest of the EU and Ukraine can reach such a compromise, Mr. Rutte may not be able to secure the backing of the Dutch Senate, where he lacks a majority. Opposition parties don’t want to be seen to be participating in what will inevitably be portrayed as an establishment stitch-up so close to elections.

The second step to defusing the bomb is to amend the referendum law to exclude international agreements. But while pro-European politicians privately say this is their goal, few are willing to say so publicly. Parties on the center-right don’t want to antagonize their increasingly euroskeptic voter base, while much of the center-left is hamstrung by its past support for the referendum law, which they backed because of a long-standing enthusiasm for direct democracy.

Instead, some mainstream politicians are privately pinning their hopes on the Christian Democrats, a center-right party currently in opposition and traditionally suspicious of direct democracy, riding to the rescue by insisting on an amendment to the law as a condition of any future coalition agreement. Yet the Christian Democrats don’t appear in any mood to let other parties off the hook so easily: The party is currently leading the parliamentary opposition to the government’s efforts to ratify the Ukraine deal.

Not surprisingly, the mood in Brussels, where this situation is being watched closely, is gloomy. One top official reckons the chances of the Dutch government defusing this bomb at less than 50%. Those may turn out to be the odds on the ultimate survival of the European project.

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 21st of November 20

>>> Up
*Enterprise Inns Raised to Neutral at Citi
*Outokumpu Raised to Reduce at AlphaValue

>>> Down
*Cie d'Entreprises CFE Cut to Hold at ING, PT EU101
*PostNL Cut to Neutral at UBS, PT EU4.60
*Technip Cut to Underperform at Bernstein, PT $14
*WS Atkins Cut to Hold at Liberum, PT 1600p

>>> PT change


>>> Initiation
*AIR LIQUIDE RATED NEW NEUTRAL AT GOLDMAN
*Clariant Rated New Neutral at Goldman
*Croda Rated New Neutral at Goldman
*DSM Rated New Sell at Goldman
*Givaudan Rated New Neutral at Goldman
*LINDE RATED NEW BUY AT GOLDMAN, ADDED TO CONVICTION LIST
*PORSCHE RATED NEW HOLD AT JEFFERIES
*Yara Rated New Neutral at Goldman

>>> Call
>> Stock
*SOLVAY RATED NEW BUY AT GOLDMAN, ADDED TO CONVICTION LIST

>>> What to look at today - 21st of November 2016

Friday US markets on close: Dow -0.2%, S&P500 -0.2%, Nasdaq -0.2%, VIX 12.9 (-0.5pts); Treasuries: 2-yr 1.08% (+2bps), 10-yr 2.34% (+6bps), 30-yr 3.02% (+3bp), Best Sector in S&P500: Conglomerates, Worst Sector in S&P500: Healthcare. Oil prices rise over 1% in electronic trade; Iraq's al-Luaibi said he plans to offer new proposals at Vienna meeting for output cut, Iran's oil min expressed confidence that members will reach a consensus, and Russia's Putin stated it would not be hard for Russia to freeze oil output. China Pres Xi: US-China relations are at a "hinge-moment" following US presidential elections; Hopeful for a smooth transition in relations with pres-elect Trump. Goldman Sachs: China property developers may begin to cut prices in Q1 of 2017. Japan: Trade balance misses consensus on headline but beats on adjusted basis for its best print in nearly 5 years; Exports fall for 13th straight month, imports fall for 22nd straight month; Exports to Europe, Asia and China down just over 9%, exports to US down over 11% y/y.

Nikkei +0.77% Hang Seng -0.10% CSI +0.43% Shanghai +0.51%

Eur$ +1.0607 CNH 6.9168 CNY 6.8980 JPY 111.04 GBP 1.2342 CHF 1.0095 RUB 64.6163

S&P +0.15% EuroStoxx +0.16% DaX +0.09% SMI -0.18%

Macro :
- Trump Presidency to Put Economic Pressure on Europe: Atos CEO
- Kentucky Pension May Stay in Some Hedge Fund Strategies: Peden
- A $19 billion hedge fund is trying to recruit tech talent with a coding contest
- Dealbook: Trump Adviser Takes Stake in China Ride-Sharing Company
- Network Rail Break-Up Mulled by U.K. Government: Sunday Times
- Moscovici Urges More EU Fiscal Stimulus: El Pais
- Airbnb Seeks to Complete 700 Tax Agreements in Cities: FT

Keep an eye on :
- AIR FP : Airbus Faces New Fines for Delays of A400M Plane: Spiegel
- AB1 GY : Tuifly, Air Berlin Leisure May Agree Merger This Week: HB
- AIXA GY : Aixtron Says Cfius to Recommend Against Purchase by Grand Chip
- ATC NA : Altice/SFR Media to Cease Publishing Expansion, AFP Reports
- ATC NA : Altice/SFR Media to Cease Publishing Expansion, AFP Reports
- BAYN GY : Bayer’s Financing for Monsanto Purchase Is Secure: Tagesspiegel
- BCP PL : BCP to Postpone Shareholder Meeting on Voting Rights: Negocios
- BCP PL : Fosun International Agrees to Buy 16.7% of BCP for EUR174.6 Mln
- BT/ LN : BT Says Openreach Dispute Delays GBP6b Investment: Telegraph
- CNA LN : Tokyo Gas Teams With Centrica to Cut LNG Shipping Costs: Nikkei
- CSGN VX : Credit Suisse’s Swiss Unit Kicks Off Operations Ahead of IPO
- DAI GY : Daimler Electric Shift Could Hit 6 of 7 Jobs: Manager Magazin
- DENERG DC : Dong Energy's oil and gas unit interests AP Moller-Maersk and EIG
- ELIOR FP : Elior Enters India, Buying Megabite Food Services, CRCL
- ENGI FP : Engie in Advanced Talks With Neptune Over Oil Unit Sale: Times
- FB US : Facebook Reports Stock Buyback of Up to $6b of Class A Shares
- GSK LN : GSK Gets FDA Approval for Expanded Use of FluLaval Quadrivalent
- INTC US : Intel Said to Plan Job Cuts in Wearables Group: TechCrunch
- ISP IM : Italian Banks Discount Keeps Widening, Intesa Still Favored: CS
- LHN VX : LafargeHolcim Sees ‘Very Encouraging’ U.S. Prospects: Investir
- LECN VX : Leclanche & Narada Power Sign Global Alliance
- LLOY LN : Lloyds Said to Be Lead Bidder for BofA U.K. Credit Card Unit: FT
- MGGT LN : New Meggitt COO in line to become CEO next year; activist Elliott approaches Honeywell, others for sale
- NESN VX : Some Nestle Foods Lose Swiss Cross on Labels: Unit CEO in SamS
- NOVN VX : Novartis Exercises Option to Buy Selexys Pharmaceuticals
- PAH3 GY : Peter Daniell Porsche Willing to Join VW Supervisory Board: FAS
- SSABS SS : SSAB Sees Strengthened Momentum in North America in 1Q: DI
- SLB US : Hess Sues Schlumberger for $200 Million-Plus on Faulty Valves
- SFR FP : Altice/SFR Media to Cease Publishing Expansion, AFP Reports
- GLE FP : SocGen Sounding Investors on Italy Consumer Unit Sale: Sole
- FP FP : Petrobras in negotiations with Total to sell stakes in oil fields, two power-plants
- UCG IM : UniCredit Remains a Buy Ahead of Strategic Update: Jefferies
- UTDI GY : United Internet May Pay Higher 2016 Dividend: Euro-am-Sonntag
- VOW3 GY : VW Should Reclaim Board Bonuses, CDU’s Fuchs Tells RND
- VOW3 GY : VW’s Hohmann-Dennhardt Defends Unequal Payout for Customers
- VOW3 GY : Peter Daniell Porsche Willing to Join VW Supervisory Board: FAS

>>> Asian Update

Asia Mid-Session Market Update: Oil rises on renewed OPEC optimism; Japan trade data mixed, Oct exports disappoint after strong showing in Q3 GDP

***Friday US markets on close: Dow -0.2%, S&P500 -0.2%, Nasdaq -0.2%***
- At the close: VIX 12.9 (-0.5pts); Treasuries: 2-yr 1.08% (+2bps), 10-yr 2.34% (+6bps), 30-yr 3.02% (+3bp)
- Best Sector in S&P500: Conglomerates
- Worst Sector in S&P500: Healthcare

***Weekend US Corporate Headlines***
- HW: To be acquired by Australia's Boral for $2.6B or $24.25/shr cash; Boral intends to raise approximately A$2.06B in new equity to partially fund the acquisition
- LOCK: Confirms to be acquired by Symantec for $2.3B or $24/shr; Symantec raises share repurchase program by $500M (3.3% of market cap) to $1.3B

***Politics***
- (US) President-elect Trump's choice of Treasury Sec narrowed down to economic advisor Steven Mnuchin and Rep Hensarling (R-TX) - press
- (DE) German Chancellor Merkel: Plans to run for 4th term as Chancellor; 2017 election will be "very difficult"; I am not irreplaceable within the CDU party
- (FR) France President center-right primary results: Francois Fillon with 44%; Alain Juppe 28% and Nikolas Sarkozy (concedes defeat) with 22%; Fillon and Juppe move to run-off next weekend.
- (KR) South Korea prosecutors determine Pres Park had a role in influence-peddling case; Top opposition Democratic Party calls for impeachment - press

***Asia Session Notable Observations, Speakers and Press***
Energy:
- Oil prices rise over 1% in electronic trade; Iraq's al-Luaibi said he plans to offer new proposals at Vienna meeting for output cut, Iran's oil min expressed confidence that members will reach a consensus, and Russia's Putin stated it would not be hard for Russia to freeze oil output.

China:
- China Pres Xi: US-China relations are at a "hinge-moment" following US presidential elections; Hopeful for a smooth transition in relations with pres-elect Trump.
- Goldman Sachs: China property developers may begin to cut prices in Q1 of 2017; Implementation of curbs in Shanghai, Nanjing and Suzhou has been stricter than in previous cycles.

Japan:
- Trade balance misses consensus on headline but beats on adjusted basis for its best print in nearly 5 years; Exports fall for 13th straight month, imports fall for 22nd straight month; Exports to Europe, Asia and China down just over 9%, exports to US down over 11% y/y.
- FSA to monitor banks' securities management amid sharp rise in JGB yields following US elections, citing concerns over widening of unrealized losses on investment into bonds

Australia:
- Goldman raises AUD/USD 3-month target to $0.78 from $0.75 and 12-month to $0.75 from $0.72. Sees Australia moving through transition point, and RBA will contemplate rate hikes thanks to sharply improving trade balance and stronger private sector demand.
- Conversely, NAB sees AUD/USD fall to $0.70 next year given risks that US interest rates will rise above RBA's OCR. NAB states under these conditions AUD typically falls below $0.60.

***Asian Equity Markets (23:30ET)***
- Nikkei225 +0.7%, S&P/ASX flat, Kospi -0.2%, Shanghai Composite +0.9%, Hang Seng +0.3%

***FX ranges/Commodities/Futures/Fixed Income (23:30ET):***
- EUR 1.0580-1.0615; JPY 110.65-111.20; AUD 0.7310-0.7545; NZD 0.6985-0.7025
- Dec gold +0.1% at $1,210/oz, Jan crude oil +1.4% at $47.10/brl, Dec copper +1.9% at $2.52/lb
- GLD: SPDR Gold Trust ETF daily holdings fall 5.3 tonnes to 920.6 tonnes; 7th straight decline; lowest since June 22nd
- SLV: iShares Silver Trust ETF daily holdings fall to 10,891 tonnes from 11,080 tonnes prior; 4th straight decline; lowest since July 31st
- Equity Futures: S&P500 +0.2%, Dax +0.1%, FTSE100 +0.2%
- USD/CNY: (CN) PBOC SETS YUAN MID POINT AT 6.8985 V 6.8796 PRIOR; weakest Yuan setting since 2008; 12th straight day of weaker Fix
- (CN) PBOC to inject CNY110B in 7-day reverse repos, CNY60B in 14-day reverse repos, and CNY15B in 28-day reverse repos
- (AU) Australia sells A$600M of 1.75% in 2020 bonds; avg yield 1.9852%; bid-to-cover 3.38x
- (KR) South Korea sells 20-yr bonds; avg yeild 2.235%

***Key economic data:***
- (JP) JAPAN OCT TRADE BALANCE: ¥496B V ¥610BE; ADJ TRADE BALANCE: ¥474B (highest since Nov 2011) V ¥404BE
- (NZ) NEW ZEALAND OCT CREDIT CARD SPENDING M/M: 2.8% V 2.6% PRIOR; Y/Y: 10.2% V 8.2% PRIOR
- (TH) THAILAND Q3 GDP Q/Q: 0.6% V 0.7%E; Y/Y: 3.2% V 3.3%E

***Asia movers***
- Oriental Press Group 18.HK: Reports H1 Net HK$60.0M v loss HK$6.0M y/y; Rev HK$507M v HK$604M y/y; +12.7%
- Melco International 200.HK: Credit Suisse Raised 200.HK to Outperform from Neutral; +7.9%
- Australia gold stocks upgraded at Deutsche; Northern Star Resources (NST) +5.3%; Regis Resources (RRL) +2.2%; Evolution Mining (EVN) +3.1%
- Doray Minerats; Macquarie Raised DRM.AU to Neutral from Underperform; +4.9%
- FamilyMart 8028.JP: Itochu said to spend around ¥40B to increase stake in the company - Nikkei; +4.8%
- Kingsoft 3888.HK: Reports Q3 Net CNY141.7M v CNY47.6M y/y; Rev CNY2.23B v CNY1.51B y/y; +4.0%
- Westfield WFD.AU: Macquarie Raised WFD.AU to Outperform from Underperform; +1.8%
- Fosun Intl; 656.HK: Entered into MOU setting out the terms of Fosuns investment in the share capital of BCP; +1.1%
- PYI Corp 498.HK: Reports H1 Net loss $3.8Mv loss $297.7M y/y, Rev $2.31B v $3.38B y/y; -3.0%
- Yuan Heng Gas Holdings Ltd 332.HK: Issues H1 profit warning; -4.3%

WSJ : Euro, Dollar Flirt With Parity



From: LAURENT CHEKROUN (MAKOR SECURITIES LO) At: 11/19/16 21:30:13
Subject: WSJ : Euro, Dollar Flirt With Parity
Euro, Dollar Flirt With Parity
Trump outlook and Fed’s likely move are strengthening dollar, and ECB may not help stop euro’s fall

A 10-day losing streak for the euro against the U.S. dollar is rekindling an old debate: Will the single currency reach parity with the dollar?

In the last two weeks, the euro has fallen 4% against the dollar, hitting $1.06, a level last seen 12 months ago.

The sharp shift in expectations for U.S. interest rates and economic growth since the presidential election has refueled the euro’s relative fall against the greenback. If the Federal Reserve increases rates, expectations are the dollar would rise further by drawing money to the U.S. looking for higher returns.

The European Central Bank, meanwhile, is showing few signs of a major shift in a monetary policy that has pushed rates into negative territory and includes a massive bond-buying program.

The euro also has to contend with a gauntlet of coming eurozone votes that could increase power for the sort of populist parties that, many investors believe, embrace policies that could stymie growth.

Following Donald Trump’s victory, Citigroup said it had shifted its euro-dollar forecast “180 degrees.” The bank now predicts the euro will tumble to just 98 cents in the next six to 12 months. This week others have joined the bank in predicting parity. The euro Friday closed at $1.058 in European trading.

The divergence of U.S. monetary and fiscal policy with the rest of the world “should be very beneficial to the dollar,” said Adnan Akant, head of currencies at asset management firm Fischer Francis Trees & Watts.

Mr. Akant now believes that parity could be reached fairly soon.

“Well, that’s only 7% to 8% away; yes, I would think so,” he said.

The euro’s decline could be good for the European economy. A weaker exchange rate will make the eurozone’s exports more competitive and should encourage inflation, which has been persistently below the ECB’s target near 2%. But such trends are not all good news for consumers, who will see a rise in the cost of dollar-denominated imports like oil.

Launched in 1999, the single currency spent much of its early years below parity, falling to as low as 83 cents in 2000, when there was a strong U.S. economy and a weak one in Europe.

But the currency has traded above $1 since late 2002, climbing to a high of $1.60 as the U.S. struggled with the financial crisis in 2008.

Analysts were last predicting parity in early 2015, when the euro was dragged down by the ECB’s introduction of quantitative easing, a bond-buying program designed to push down interest rates.

That March, the euro fell to as low as $1.046. But U.S. interest-rate rises didn’t occur as fast as economists were predicting, puncturing the trade.

Monetary policy divergence is once again driving the euro lower against the dollar.

Goldman Sachs expects one interest-rate increase soon from the Federal Reserve, followed by another three in 2017, and believes the ECB will extend its QE program to the end of 2017.

But the current fall is also different from 2015’s big decline. Back then, the euro dropped against the currencies of almost all its major trading partners. This time, the euro is actually up 1.8% this year against a trade-weighted basket.

Not all strategists believe parity is destined. There are two actors in this trade, the euro and the dollar.

“A lot of good news has already been priced in for the U.S., possibly too much,” said Geoffrey Yu, head of the U.K. investment office at UBS Wealth Management, who also bet against parity in early 2015.

“If you just look at how the eurozone has performed in terms of data, things look better than they did the last time people were gunning for parity,” he said.

The eurozone economy has grown slowly but consistently for each of the last nine quarters, expanding by between 0.3% and 0.8% of GDP every three months.

Alongside interest-rate expectations, political risk is weighing on the currency.

“Both blades of the scissor are moving against the euro right now,” said Marc Chandler, a strategist at Brown Brothers Harriman in New York. “My view is that the currency goes to record lows.”

Europe has already witnessed one political earthquake this year, when the British surprised investors by voting to leave the European Union. Now, the eurozone’s political diary is full of potential market shocks.

Early next month, a constitutional referendum in Italy could sink the government of Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. The resignation of Mr. Renzi, one of Europe’s most reform-minded leaders, could freeze Italy’s economic overhaul and erase the meager growth the country has generated.

Also lining up are key elections in France, Germany and the Netherlands, all of which have seen populist right-wing parties gain support.

Investors “were surprised on Brexit, they were surprised on the U.S. election,” said Mark McCormick, head of North American foreign exchange strategy at TD Securities. “This time, they will want to be more cautious when it comes to Europe.”