We are short shares of Straight Path Communications, a disgraced “5G” hype vehicle whose stock price surged last week for an unusual reason: the announcement of a harsh regulatory crackdown. After a pseudonymous short seller in 2015 accused Straight Path of “fraud,” the FCC opened its own investigation into whether the company had violated its legal duty to actually provide service rather than merely hoard spectrum for the sake of speculation. To end this investigation, Straight Path agreed to pay up to $100 million over time, surrender many of its licenses, and sell its entire remaining spectrum portfolio, with 20% of the sale proceeds going to the FCC.The market greeted this news joyously, apparently relieved that Straight Path had avoided an even more draconian penalty and convinced that a spectrum sale would be fast and lucrative. This optimism is badly misplaced. Straight Path’s spectrum is worth far less than the company’s current half-billion-dollar market cap. Indeed, as we discuss below, Verizon is set to buy a similar amount of higher-quality spectrum from a sophisticated, deep-pocketed seller – Carl Icahn – for just $200 million, 61% lower than where Straight Path trades, implying massive downside for its stock price even before taking into account the harsh FCC penalties. Adjusting for these penalties and the lower quality of Straight Path’s spectrum, we believe the true downside exceeds 70%. The notion that a company that holds less than $10 million in cash, burns $7 million a year, and must pay out $15 million in fines in the next nine months will drive a drastically harder bargain than Carl Icahn – in a government-mandated fire sale – is beyond absurd. Yet to own Straight Path at this price, that’s what one must believe.
After Hours Summary: SALE +49% on buyout news, MXWL +40% on SDIC equity investment,After Hours Gainers:
Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: SALE +49% (RetailMeNot to be acquired by Harland Clarke Holdings for $11.60 per share in cash), MXWL +40.4% (signs stock purchase agreement with SDIC Fund - purchase price is $6.32/share and is anticipated to represent approx 19.9% of co's common stock; also Maxwell Tech and Viex Capital enter cooperation agreement), QUOT +10.6% (SALE sympathy), AUPH +4.4% (initiated with a Overweight at Cantor Fitzgerald; tgt $14), SVU +2.6% (Supervalu to acquire Unified Grocers for approx $375 mln; expected to be accretive to EPS in the first full fiscal year following closing)
After Hours Losers:
Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: SLP -8.2%, MTSC -4.1%, SEAC -3.3% (light volume)
Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: CYTX -23.8% (commences common stock offering), UNFI -0.9% (continued weakness following JANA / WFM news), FRO -0.9% (files for $300 mln mixed securities shelf offering), UAL -0.8% (reports March traffic, DOT concerns may also be attributed to modest pullback), VRX -0.8% (schedules annual meeting for May 2)
Closing Market Summary: Equities Eke Out Win To Kick Off the WeekThe stock market opened the week with a win, but concerns over heightened geopolitical tensions held gains in check throughout the session. The S&P 500 and the Nasdaq settled with slim gains of 0.1% apiece, while the Dow finished flat.
Investors started the day with optimism, moving the major averages modestly higher, but there was no doubt that last week's missile strike in Syria weighed on the positive sentiment. In addition, the U.S. Navy ordered the Carl Vinson Strike group to begin moving towards the Korean peninsula over the weekend. With those concerns playing in the background, the stock market dipped into negative territory around midday on rumors that China deployed about 150,000 troops in two groups to its border with North Korea. Equities recovered shortly thereafter, but never quite made it back to their best levels of the day.
This rumor of Chinese troop movement has been gaining traction with Asian media in recent days, and it has been noticed by U.S. investors during an abbreviated week, which is likely to see reduced participation. That was the case on Monday with only 794.0 million shares changing hands at the NYSE floor (200-day average: 1.1 billion).
For sector standings, the energy group (+0.8%) finished atop the day's leaderboard thanks to a solid performance from crude oil. The commodity finished 1.6% higher at $53.06/bbl following further production complications in Libya. The country's largest oilfield was shut down on Sunday after a group blocked a pipeline linking it to an oil terminal.
The consumer discretionary (+0.4%), industrials (+0.2%), consumer staples (+0.3%), real estate (+0.7%), and utilities (+0.2%) sectors also outperformed the broader market. Retailers helped the consumer discretionary sector in its advance, evidenced by the 1.5% increase in the SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT 42.11, +0.60). One of the XRT's top-performers was Amazon (AMZN 907.04, +12.16), which added 1.4% in another solid performance.
On the flip side, the financials (-0.3%) and telecom services (-0.3%) groups settled at the bottom of the day's leaderboard while the health care (-0.2%) and technology (-0.2%) groups performed only modestly better. The top-weighted technology sector suffered from a lackluster performance from its top component by market cap, Apple (AAPL 143.14, -0.20), and selling pressure within the semiconductor industry; the PHLX Semiconductor Index closed lower by 0.8%.
In the Treasury market, the main event, Fed Chair Janet Yellen's speech at the University of Michigan, has yet to occur. Ms. Yellen will participate in a question-and-answer session with the public shortly at 16:10 ET. The benchmark 10-yr yield settled two basis points lower at 2.36%.
Investors did not receive any economic data on Monday. The first report of the week--February JOLTS--will cross the wires tomorrow at 10:00 ET.
- Nasdaq Composite +9.3% YTD
- S&P 500 +5.3% YTD
- Dow Jones Industrial Average +4.5% YTD
- Russell 2000 +0.7% YTD
![]()

After much debate about the widening gap of M1-M2 growth in 1H2016, the story shifts to this gap narrowing again since last July.
- 1H2016: When the M1-M2 gap widened since Mar 2015, many argued it indicated more funding was moving into short-term investment, likely to push up the domestic A-share equity market instantly. Some believed it was a sign of severe liquidity trap, and, as a result, monetary expansion would fail to reflate the economy.
- 2H2016-2017: After the gap peaked in July 2016, a new theory emerged, claiming the narrowing gap was due to capital being channeled into the real economy, which would lead to an imminent investment boom.
Limited prediction power on growth or stock marketIn our view, the M1-M2 growth gap has shown limited prediction power over future investment demand and equity market performance.
- Despite the widening in M1-M2 growth gap in 1H16, there is no evidence of a liquidity trap or an A-share rally afterward. Government bond yields rose notably since August, and our BofAML China ACT index rebounded in March and improved slightly by July 2016. The SHCOMP index first corrected 28% to 2,688 in Feb 2016), and then came back by 11% to 2,979 in July 2016.
- The narrowing M1-M2 growth gap since 2H2016 did not lead to an investment boom either. FAI growth only picked up to 8.9% yoy in January-February from 7.8% in 4Q and 7.0% in 3Q16, due to higher infrastructure investment.
- Slower home sales growth: Home purchases effectively shift money from households’ deposits (part of M2, but not M1), into home presale proceeds in developers’ demand deposit. As home sales growth slowed down from peak levels in spring 2016 due to tighter property policies and a higher comparison base, it becomes much less supportive for M1 growth.
- Potentially a small improvement in capex demand in some areas: Real borrowing costs for some up-to-mid stream corporates came down with a rapid rise in PPI inflation, while expected investment-returns may rebound on better growth expectation and supply-side reform. As such, capex demand may be encouraged in some areas even though an overall boom is absent. [The idea here being that when M1 growth starts to decline and M2 growth rises, it means some cash has found its way into some specific projects and is no longer housed in demand deposits account waiting for immediate financial transactions.]
- Tapered fiscal easing: In our view, the strong fiscal easing from 2015 to early 2016 mobilized funds from time to demand deposits at public organizations (POs), ready for spending. But as funds were allocated to projects while fiscal easing tapered, POs’ demand deposit growth has started to ease gradually.


