BHP Billiton shareholders say comments cited by activist Elliott Advisors lack context
15 JUN 2017
Some BHP Billiton [LSE:BLT] [ASX:BHP] shareholders have rejected the activist investment firm Elliott Advisors’ claim that it has their support for its campaign that demands a change in strategy and structure at the FTSE-100 mining group, The Daily Mail reported on Thursday (15 June).
Elliott on Wednesday, 14 June, claimed that BHP institutional investors such as AMP Capital, Aberdeen Asset Management, BT Investment Management, Escala, Schroders and Tribeca Global were calling for a change at BHP, the item said. The investors were quoted as critical of some aspects of BHP’s management.
However, it is thought that several shareholders named by Elliott are dismissive of the suggestion that they support the activist's campaign and believe that some of their comments have been used without context, the item continued.
One shareholder quoted in the report said they are quite confident with BHP’s direction overall, although some changes are necessary.
Elliott, which owns a 4.1% holding in BHP, is urging the company’s board to exit its US shale business and to “upgrade” its board, the article noted. Elliott also wants BHP to unify its listing - the company currently has listings in Australia and London - and a spin-off of BHP’s oil and gas business.
Elliott said shareholders have in recent weeks clearly indicated the need for meaningful and substantial change.
The activist investment firm quoted AMP Capital as saying that AMP had urged BHP to independently asses Elliott’s proposal regarding the dual listing and to demonstrate the value of its onshore US operations. However, AMP’s full letter to clients, seen by the newspaper, added that Elliott should allow BHP enough time to present its case for retaining the US onshore energy business and sufficient time to meet its targets.
Schroders Investment Management, according to Elliott, described BHP’s dual-listing as a hangover from the “diabolical” Billiton deal and that the company’s expansion into shale gas in the US was “more painful,” the item continued. However, the full quote, from Martin Conlon, BHP’s head of Australian equities, added that Elliott’s proposal raises further questions regarding outcomes and incentives. Conlon’s full quote also said there is “limited interest” in initiatives regarding changes of listing venues.
Elliott Advisors refused to comment, the report said.
BHP Billiton plc’s market capitalisation stood at GBP 69.28bn (EUR 78.69bn) at the close of trading in London on Wednesday