>>> Metso CEO departure blow to company as group touted as potential target – re

Metso CEO departure blow to company as group touted as potential target

Metso [HEL: METSO], the Finnish industrial group, faced a blow with the departure of its CEO, as it has been subject to takeover speculations, according to Kauppalehti.
The Finnish-language unsourced piece wrote about the departure of Nico Delvaux, the CEO, who was with Metso for only four months. Metso has been mentioned as a potential target for the Swedish Atlas Copco [STO: ATCO-A] due to their complementary product arsenal.
Activist investor, the Swedish Cevian Capital, which owns 15% of Metso was keen to sell the company to the British Weir Group few years ago. However, the Finnish state, which also owns 15% through its investment company Solidium, blocked the sale.
The item said that the state is unlikely to sell its stake.
Metso has also been cautious with its M&A moves, the item added.

(CS) Global Eq. Strat. : 2018 Outlook: Themes, Sectors and Styles

Themes: Technological disruption remains the most important theme and hence idiosyncratic factors are dominating stock and sector performance. Buy European domestic demand plays, focus on non-US defence, global construction and leisure/experiences. The risk is in credit, and we examine plays on that.

Style: We continue with our long-standing overweight of growth (though benchmark in Europe), with a focus on short duration (i.e. high FCF). We remain overweight European small caps. We bring US small caps down to benchmark, and stay underweight UK small caps. Dividend aristocrats look too cheap in Europe.

Sector upgrades to overweight: Auto OEMs, budget airlines, tobacco.

Sector downgrades: Big cap pharma and mining (to benchmark); non-content broadcasters (to underweight). We go into 2018 a small underweight of cyclicals (ex. financials), with cyclicals driven by lead indicators, not bonds.

Key overweights: Technology (software, gaming, cybersecurity, though we reduce our overweight in internet), financials (retail banks in Spain, French composite insurers, GEM-exposed life and P&C), employment agencies, auto components (though reduced), European wireless telecoms, German real estate and healthcare equipment (hearing aids).

Key underweights: Capital goods (China-exposed and growth names), utilities (UK regulated), asset management (retail focused), food producers/HPC, freight forwarders, legacy wireline telecoms, hotels, UK office REITs and UK homebuilders, Continental European retailing and GDSs.

(CS) EU Semiconductors

* Infineon (OP) and STM (N). On IFX, we model ATV sales of €754mn for Dec-Q (+2.5% qoq/+7% yoy) vs. +7% yoy growth in the last quarter. Our view remains that its ATV can grow sales at over 10% CAGR (2% unit CAGR + 5% content CAGR + share gains). For STM, we expect high single digit pa growth for its Auto revenues within ADG segment over 2017/2018
driven by multiple design wins around electrification and radars.

(CS) European Utilities - 2018 Outlook

A year of transition
* 2017 sector performance was strong, helped by growing commodity and power prices as well as limited interest rate
headwinds. Multiple expansion also played a role, in our view. 
* 2018 could be a ’year of transition’:
(i) multiples no longer look attractive, with the sector P/E (FY+1 P/E: 14.4x) above both CS fair value (13.6x) and the 20-year average (14.0x);
(ii) earnings growth has stabilised at around 5% and we do not expect it to improve materially before 2019. However, FCF
generation continues to improve.
* Business models continue to be challenged and we would expect more companies to react to exogenous challenges by
breaking up their traditionally integrated models.
* Balance sheets seem to be much less of a concern than in the past. We expect M&A, which has resurfaced in 2017, to remain a theme in 2018, while we see some upside risk on dividends.

Heading into 2018, these are our top picks:
* Preferred stocks: Enel, Gas Natural Fenosa, Snam, Vinci
* Least preferred stocks: CEZ, EDP, Pennon, Suez
* Stocks to watch: Centrica, Engie, Uniper, United Utilities

FT : At ground zero of eurozone crisis, Italy’s Pesaro sees recovery

At ground zero of eurozone crisis, Italy’s Pesaro sees recovery

Economic fortunes of small industrial towns could be pivotal to EU’s fate in the coming years

For Simona Ricci, a 49-year-old trade union official in Pesaro, a city of 95,000 along Italy’s Adriatic coast, the financial crisis hit like a natural disaster, or a nuclear attack.

“Almost everything was wiped out, and this was a land of relative wellbeing,” says Ms Ricci, speaking in the offices of the CGIL union on Via Gagarin — a street named after the Soviet cosmonaut — in Pesaro’s industrial district.

“There was a Darwinian selection of the manufacturing system and anything associated with it — including services. The dramatic effects of this are still being felt.”

The province of Pesaro-Urbino, in Marche region, is emblematic of the Italian economy. Home to many small and medium-sized, often family-run, manufacturing companies, it suffered a huge reversal in fortunes in recent years.

In 2007 unemployment was 3.2 per cent — about as good as it gets in advanced economies. By 2016, joblessness had risen to 12.5 per cent — even higher than the national average — after the crisis exposed the weak competitiveness and low productivity of many local firms, driving them out of business.

There was no major public sector presence, or tourist industry, to soften the blow — and to make matters worse, the region’s top bank, Banca Marche, collapsed under the weight of its bad loans.


But even here, at one of the ground zeros of the eurozone economy, there are signs of improvement. The companies that survived — due to sheer size, exposure to faster-growing export markets or investments in automation — are seeing growth in revenues and employment.

“If you drive through the industrial district in the rush hour, you start to get some congestion, more trucks in the roundabouts,” says Giorgio Calcagnini, a professor of economics at the University of Urbino.

Business leaders and public officials are finally breathing a sigh of relief.

“We are still in a phase of suffering but we have started moving again,” says Matteo Ricci, the centre-left mayor. “I feared that social cohesion could have been damaged, but it held up. And now we’re looking to the future with greater hope.”

The economic fortunes of places like Pesaro — the hometown of 19th century opera composer Gioachino Rossini — may be pivotal to the EU’s fate in the coming years. In its latest economic forecast, Brussels projected that its 28 member states would grow by an average of 2.2 per cent this year — their fastest pace in a decade.


Even in Italy, a perennial eurozone laggard, the GDP outlook was upgraded this year to 1.5 per cent, from 0.9 per cent in 2016. The improvement has eased some fears that the country is the biggest source of economic and financial risk in the eurozone. Standard & Poor’s raised its rating for Italian debt to BBB from BBB-, the first rating increase in three decades.

But there are still plenty of doubts about the sustainability and breadth of the Italian recovery, given the country’s persistently high public debt, the vulnerability of its banking system, its stagnant productivity and other structural weaknesses.

Moreover, until both the reality — and perception — of better times feeds through to the streets of small manufacturing hubs such as Pesaro, there is unlikely to be any drop in political support for populist Eurosceptic parties — such as the Five Star Movement and the Northern League — that feed off economic anger.

On a national level, Italy is certainly experiencing an industrial revival — or at least a rebound. The IHS Markit Italian Manufacturing index, a survey of sentiment among factory owners in the country, jumped to 58.3 in November of 2017 from 57.8 in September, posting its strongest reading since 2011 on the back of strong measures of output, new orders and employment.

Meanwhile, industrial production as measured by Istat, Italy’s main economic statistical agency, rose 2.9 per cent in the first 10 months of the year, compared with the same period in 2016.

But the Marche region, as a whole, is still struggling. According to a study by the local section of Confindustria, the local business lobby group, industrial production was up just 0.7 per cent on average.

“We lost a lot of productive capacity and we are still far from the levels we had in 2007 and 2008,” says Salvatore Giordano, the director-general of Confindustria Marche Nord, which includes the province of Pesaro.


Mr Giordano confirms that those companies that did emerge alive from the crisis are beginning to crank things up — some in a big way. One of them is Valmex, a family-owned maker of aluminium and copper heat exchangers, used in boilers around the world. It has seen sales rise this year, and hired at least 70 more people this year, bringing the total to about 350.

“I would actually say the crisis helped us. It obliged us to keep our nerve, to invest and stay in the market,” says Severino Capodagli, the company owner.

One of the beneficiaries of Valmex’s growth is Mattia Zenobi, a mechanical engineer, who was hired by the company this year just before he graduated from university. For about €1,300 a month, he performs quality checks along the assembly line. “It’s my first real job. It’s stimulating, and gratifying too,” Mr Zenobi, 25, says. “They saw a light in me.”


In the next two years, he hopes to leave home and move into a small place of his own. But more importantly, Mr Zenobi believes his case is no longer that unusual. “My friends are more or less either under contract or doing an apprenticeship,” he says. “Companies are starting to hire again.”

Groups such as Valmex have benefited from tax incentives promoted by the centre-left governments of both Matteo Renzi and Paolo Gentiloni to amortise the purchase of new machinery — a programme called Industry 4.0 that is intended to spur investment in automation and give a jolt to competitiveness and productivity.

“No matter what you think of this government, it is the only one that gave real incentives for companies to invest,” says Mr Capodagli. “Now if you go order a piece of machinery you have to wait a year, a year-and-a-half, two years. Before the equipment maker would throw it at you because it was ready. They are all full, they can’t take orders. It means something is happening.”


But the worry is that there are simply not enough companies that are big enough or strong enough to be able to take advantage of either the tax breaks or the improving environment.

“The incentives seem to be working but there’s a size problem,” says Ms Ricci. “The group of medium-sized companies that emerged from the crisis better than others is so small around here that I don’t think this will have an impact on the quality and quantity of employment for a long time.”

Mr Giordano put it more bluntly: “We only have a few cavalli di razza, [pure-bred horses]”.

For now, caution still seems to be the prevailing attitude. At Scavolini, the kitchen maker that is one of Pesaro’s flagship companies and made it through the crisis thanks to investments in automation and an aggressive marketing campaign, sales are up this year.

But Fabiana Scavolini, the chief executive, is still hesitant. “It’s slow. Let’s say slow. There’s a lot of talk about a big recovery, and there are a few signs, but I’d rather say things are stable.”

At Fiam, a maker of glass furniture, founder Vittorio Livi says “people are more serene and starting to have more confidence that the business is changing”, compared with when they were just “crying, crying, crying”. But he is not quite ready to start adding employees. “Non dire gatto se non ce l’hai nel sacco,” he says, a proverb that amounts to “don’t count your chickens until they hatch”.

But a floor below Ms Ricci’s office at CGIL, Michela Tozzi, 22, has a glimmer in her eyes. The job situation is still “tragic” for many of her friends, but for her, the recovery has arrived. She has come to tell them she has found work as a part-time saleswoman in a clothing shop — a sign that for her at least, things are improving. “I’m more than happy,” she says.

FT : PSA faces harder decisions over Opel cuts

PSA faces harder decisions over Opel cuts
French carmaker has been careful to avoid cuts and closures — but for how long?

Walking out of Opel’s factory headquarters in Rüsselsheim in Germany, workers are surprisingly upbeat in spite of the threat of job losses after General Motors sold the German carmaker to France’s PSA earlier this year.

“Our team thinks there is potential for more opportunities,” says Manuel, an engineer and one of 15,000 employees at the plant. “We have a bigger market [with] the joint forces we have. We can offer more variants to our customers.”

Another says that he hopes for better practices at Opel, which he describes as inflexible and slow under GM. “That’s our hope with PSA — that we can be more free, have more autonomy.”

But the optimistic outlook on the factory floor jars with the hard reality facing the group’s management, having sealed a deal that makes PSA the second-biggest-selling car group in Europe after Volkswagen earlier this year. 

Opel notched up $19bn of total losses since 1999 under General Motors, and when PSA bought the division earlier this year the new owner said it would need to cut €1.1bn in costs by 2020 to return it to profit.


In November, PSA management spoke of “necessary and unavoidable” cuts to labour at Opel, which also owns Vauxhall in the UK. But it surprised many analysts by pulling its punches on job cuts during its strategic update, saying it would strive to avoid compulsory redundancies and site closures by combining manufacturing, research and procurement.

Investor hopes are that chief executive Carlos Tavares can turn Opel round as he did with PSA. In 2014, when the owner of Peugeot and Citroën brands was on the brink of collapse, Mr Tavares oversaw a recovery based on drastic cost savings and plant closures. Now, PSA is not just surviving, it is achieving better profit margins than rivals. 

While PSA revenue has only increased from €53.1bn in 2013 to €55.4bn in the last four quarters, according to S&P Capital IQ, operating profits have turned from a loss of €389m to a profit of €3.4bn. In half-year results, PSA reported operating margins of 7.3 per cent against less than 4 per cent at the Volkswagen brand.

But analysts are worried the trick will be hard to repeat. “Opel needs more hands-on management and PSA needs to move faster and more aggressively,” says Bernstein’s Max Warburton. 

He adds that PSA “has revealed very few details about what it’s found at Opel and we have no financials to work from. In this kind of vacuum, it's easy to see why investors are getting nervous.”


The European car market is threatening to turn in the near future following years of expansion, particularly as the threat of Brexit looms over the industry.

Analysts are already worried about the cost of Opel’s strategy to meet the EU's 2020 carbon emissions targets, when stiff penalties will hit carmakers missing those targets. Citi estimates the cost of compliance for Opel could be between €1bn to €3bn as the company switches to cleaner PSA technologies at a faster rate.

But the emissions targets — which could lead to millions in euros of fines — are seen by analysts as less of a worry than the fundamental task facing PSA in restructuring Opel and reducing its fixed costs. Opel has a significantly higher ratio of wages to revenue than PSA.

PSA wants to save €1.1bn annually by 2020, rising to €1.7bn by 2026, and taking €700 off the production cost of each car.

But analysts say Mr Tavares faces a different sort of challenge to PSA. “My view is they tried to pitch this thing as another Peugeot turnround, but it really cannot be compared,” says Thomas Besson, at Kepler Cheuvreux.

Analysts argue much of the groundwork at Peugeot, including a crucial agreement with unions, was done before Mr Tavares arrived. The deep crisis at the company also led to the French government coming onboard as an emergency shareholder. 

“That meant it turning a blind eye and allowing them to do this restructuring,” says Mr Besson.

PSA “softened us up psychologically. They played up the crisis and it became much harder to fight the cuts," says Thomas Baudoin, a spokesperson for French union CGT.

According to Citi, between 2011 and 2016, PSA reduced its automotive workforce in Europe by close to 28,000 workers, or roughly 25 per cent. 

In order to meet PSA's benchmarks, Opel will eventually have to cut its 38,000 strong workforce by between 5,000 to 8,000, at a cost of about €500m, estimates Citi. But with conditions less dire and government support for a wide restructuring lacking, Mr Tavares will not have the same free hand



PSA appears eager to avoid forced job cuts or factory closures so far. Opel reached an agreement with its unions last Friday aimed at avoiding compulsory job losses through shorter working hours, voluntary redundancies and other cost savings.

“The good news . . . is that the unions were somewhat involved in the drawing up of the plan. There is buy-in of some sort,” says Philippe Houchois at Jefferies.

“I think it's not exactly the same context [as the PSA agreement with its unions] but the situation could be compared and the spirit is the same,” says Xavier Chéreau, a PSA human resources director, who took part in the union talks. 

Mr Tavares also comes with his personal credit at a high. “Tavares has a high level of credibility,” says Mr Besson. “He has an amazing level of aura and PSA know it and they play it.”

But further cuts will need to occur, and analysts warn that these sorts of decisions will only get harder. The problem for factory workers is that the big decisions are still to come. 

“Right now there is no need and it would actually be negative for them to do a massive reduction of headcount,” says Mr Houchois. “So the first approach is a soft approach, based on talks with unions and voluntary departures.”

The soft touch helps explain why Opel workers remain optimistic, for now. “I take it as a challenge, an opportunity to grow,” says a third engineer in Rüsselsheim. “You don’t have to take it as something bad. It’s a possibility to change.”

Mr Houchois warns the next phase could be tougher if PSA tries to reduce capacity. “That will be harder and based on whether Opel itself can reduce costs [as well as] Brexit risks and broader market conditions,” he says.

>>> US After Hours Summary: STAY +6% and HEI +1.6% following earni

After Hours Summary: STAY +6% and HEI +1.6% following earnings/guidance, CARS +8.5% on Starboard stake, MDR -1.8% lower on CBI all-stock merger news

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: STAY +6% (announces CFO Jonathan Halkyard to Succeed Gerry Lopez as CEO on January 1, 2018; raised FY 17 revs guidance), HEI +1.6%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: AMPE +12.5% (continued strength after 25% move higher today), CARS +8.5% (jumps on Starboard 9.9% active stake disclosure), SCMP +7.2% (after being initiated with Buy and $43 tgt at Nomura / Instinet), OTIV +7% (following Monday's 120% move higher), APTI +4.7% (higher on light volume after Morgan Stanley increases passive stake), PTEN +2.9% (light volume; higher following MDR / CBI news), KTOS +2.8% (lifting after announcing that its Unmanned Systems Division recently received a single award IDIQ contract, with a $27 million ceiling from a U.S. Government Agency related to unmanned drone systems), SQM +2.7% (to begin a new conciliation process), CSOD +2.6% (indicated higher after Silver Lake discloses 10.8% active stake pursuant to the investment agreement), TRVG +2.6% (light volume; 683 Capital Management discloses 7.2% passive stake), SONC +2.3% (after Southeastern Asset Management becomes active investor / affirms 16% stake), NUAN +2.2% (still checking for anything specfic), RIOT +1.8% (continued strength after 28% move higher on Monday), CHCT +1.4% (will replace Ruby Tuesday (RT) in the S&P SmallCap 600), PH +0.9% (ticking higher; Department of Justice confirmed settlement with Parker-Hannifin - requires Parker-Hannifin to divest the Facet filtration business), KORS +0.5% (initiated with Buy/$69 tgt at Needham), CBI +0.4% (CB&I and McDermott to merge in $6 bln deal E&C deal; CB&I shareholders will be entitled to receive 2.47221 shares of MDR), LMT +0.4% (ticking higher after being awarded several government contracts)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: LFIN -30.9% (after surging 200%+ higher and CEO's appearance on CNBC Fast Money), NVAX -18.8% (continues Phase 3 trial of the RSV F Vaccine for infants via maternal immunization and provides update on Phase 1/2 Trial of the NanoFlu Vaccine), MARA -5.4% (to sell 1,354,546 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $7,450,000), MLNK -4.5% (modestly pulling back), CIO -3.5% (commences 4 mln common stock offering), AERI -2.1% (confirmed FDA approval of Rhopressa for elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension), MON -2% (still checking - possibly BAYRY related), MDR -1.8% (CB&I and McDermott to merge in $6 bln deal E&C deal; CB&I shareholders will be entitled to receive 2.47221 shares of MDR), PETX -1.8% (entered into a Sales Agreement with Cowen pursuant to which the Company may sell up $50.0 million of shares of its common stock), MB -1.7% (lower following block trade pricing), DPW -1.6% (files for $100 mln mixed securities shelf offering)

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 19th of December 2017

>>> Up
* Gemalto Upgraded to Add at AlphaValue
* Gas Natural Upgraded to Outperform at Credit Suisse; PT 21 Euros
* Melia Hotels Raised to Buy at Bankinter Securities
* National Grid Raised to Outperform at Macquarie; PT 9.90 Pounds
* Siemens Upgraded to Outperform at MainFirst; PT 130 Euros
* Snam Upgraded to Outperform at Credit Suisse; PT 4.60 Euros
* Voestalpine Upgraded to Buy at SocGen; PT 58.70 Euros

>>> Down
* AB Foods Downgraded to Sector Perform at RBC; PT 31 Pounds
* Alstria Office Downgraded to Hold at Bankhaus Lampe
* Buwog Downgraded to Hold at Commerzbank; PT 29 Euros
* Buwog Downgraded to Hold at Deutsche Bank
* Buwog Cut to Accept The Offer at Kepler Cheuvreux
* H&M Downgraded to Hold at DNB Markets; PT 175 Kronor
* Infineon Downgraded to Hold at Bankhaus Lampe
* Italgas Downgraded to Neutral at Credit Suisse
* Pandox Upgraded to Buy at DNB Markets; PT 170 Kronor
* Saga Downgraded to Sector Perform at RBC; PT 1.35 Pounds

>>> Initiation
* Iberpapel Gestion Resumed Buy at Intermoney Valores

>>> Call

(MS) European Telcos Set to Perform Better in 201

European Telcos Set to Perform Better in 2018: Morgan Stanley

European telcommunications companies have underperformed for a second year, with big cap stocks among the main laggards, but 2018 should see an improvement, Morgan Stanley says in note.
  • Cites momentum trade being potentially overbought, decent quarterly results, successful cost cuts, mobile recovery and low cash taxes as factors to spur recovery
  • Top picks are Orange, Vodafone, KPN, Telecom Italia, Cellnex, Com Hem and Masmovil
  • Suggests avoiding Tele2, Telefonica Deutschland, Swisscom
  • Cuts Nos SGPS to equal-weight from overweight
  • Cost cuts seen having further to run, notes “new generation” of cost cutters having emerged including Orange, Vodafone, Telenor
  • Says Fiber spend now implied in Deutsche Telekom and Orange consensus but not in BT
  • Sees scope for buybacks at Orange, Vodafone
  • MS notes that sharp underperformance has typically been followed by strong outperformance, while telcos also screen attractively vs broader market on valuation
  • NOTE: SXKP telcos index is 2nd-worst performing sub-sector in Stoxx 600 in 2017, down 2.5% vs SXXP up 8.6%