FT : Top sensor maker Hesai warns world not ready for fully driverless cars

Top sensor maker Hesai warns world not ready for fully driverless cars
Co-founder takes ‘conservative’ view on autonomous vehicles as shares rise 11% in Hong Kong listing

The world’s biggest maker of sensors for self-driving cars has poured cold water on the chance of rapid growth for fully autonomous vehicles, saying society and regulators are not ready to accept deaths caused by machines that drive themselves.

David Li, co-founder of Shanghai-based lidar maker Hesai, said he remained “conservative” about the pace of scaling up fully autonomous vehicles.

“Close to one million people lose their lives every year to car accidents. If a technology company builds a vehicle that kills one person every year, that’s one-millionth of the difference, but it will have trouble to survive,” said Li in an interview ahead of his company’s listing in Hong Kong.

The statement from a big supplier of a part crucial to self-driving cars comes despite the launch of robotaxi services by Elon Musk’s Tesla and Waymo, owned by Google parent Alphabet, in the US.

In China, search giant Baidu and start-ups including Pony.ai and WeRide operate self-driving fleets. Some carmakers have also equipped their models with semi-autonomous capabilities, but Beijing has tightened regulations on them after a fatal crash involving a Xiaomi SU7 electric sedan.

“We have a very low tolerance when they make a mistake,” said Li. “It is not just a technology question — it is a social question, it is a regulatory question, it is a political question.”


Hesai was founded in 2014 and raised $190mn in an initial public offering in New York in 2023. The company accounts for more than a third of global car lidar sales and is expanding its market share as a supplier for robotics.

On Tuesday, the company raised HK$4.16bn (US$535mn) through its offering in Hong Kong. Shares rose more than 11 per cent to HK$237.

The deal was underwritten by state-backed China International Capital Corporation, Guotai Haitong and CMB International Capital, with cornerstone investors including a subsidiary of Chinese billionaire Zhang Lei’s Hillhouse and south-east Asian superapp operator Grab.

Funds from the listing will be used for research, product development, factory expansion and manufacturing automation, according to the prospectus.

Since President Donald Trump took office this year, US-listed Chinese technology companies have considered offering shares in Hong Kong amid mounting concern that his administration might pursue delistings of Chinese companies.

Hesai has been fighting allegations by the Pentagon that it has links to the Chinese military, but Li said its dual listing did not reflect fear of an impending delisting in the US.

“There’s always rumours, but we don’t operate based on rumour,” said Li, adding that the company believed investors in Hong Kong had a better understanding of the self-driving car sector.

Lidar sensors use pulsed laser light to generate a three-dimensional map of a machine’s surrounding environment to help guide it and avoid collisions. The global market for the technology is forecast to reach $6.6bn in 2030 from $2.8bn this year, according to logistics data provider Mordor Intelligence.

Hesai reported second-quarter net profit of Rmb44.1mn ($6.2mn), up from a net loss of Rmb72.1mn the same period last year. Revenues rose 54 per cent to Rmb706.4mn.

Shipments more than tripled to 352,000-plus units, as more companies adopted lidar to support so-called level-two autonomy, which includes speed and steering support and more advanced features such as lane change signalling and hands-free urban driving.

While Hesai believes it is well-placed to meet increased lidar demand as more sophisticated level-three systems are commercialised, Li is more immediately upbeat on robotics.

He said Hesai could leverage its technology and manufacturing scale from the car business to provide lidar sensors for autonomous products such as humanoid robots, drones, lawnmowers and forklifts.

Amid rising western protectionism against Chinese-made technology, the group is also moving to diversify manufacturing outside China.

Construction on its first overseas factory, in south-east Asia, is expected to start in late 2026.

>>> US After Hours Summary: HITI +13.9% nicely higher on earnings; WBTN +71.1% o

After Hours Summary: HITI +13.9% nicely higher on earnings; WBTN +71.1% on signing term sheet with Disney for new digital comics platform; PLAY -14.5% sharply lower on earnings

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: HITI +13.9%, STLD +1.1%, LTC +1%,

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: WBTN +71.1% (non-binding term sheet with Disney for new digital comics platform), AIV +14.5% (closes sale of four properties), ORN +10.5% (new contract awards), AIRE +2.3% (upgrades AI assistant), CMG +2.1% (additional $500 mln for share repurchases), NYXH +1.9% (files patent infringement lawsuit), ADT +1.5% (asset purchase agreement with Everon), ARCB +0.9% (increases share repurchase authorization), HBNC +0.6% (balance sheet repositioning), FBK +0.6% (authorizes new $150 mln share repurchase program), COHR +0.4% (launches WELD1D+), LAKE +0.1% (completes acquisitions of Arizona PPE Recon and California PPE Recon), TRTX +0.1% (CFO to retire, appoints interm CFO), CNS +0.1% (CFO to resign)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: PLAY -14.5%

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: ADTN -10.1% (convertible notes offering), RCAT -5.5% ($300 mln mixed securities shelf offering), NOC -5.2% (awarded $972 mln Air Force contract), OSCR -4.9% (convertible notes offering), RKLB -3.8% ($750 mln ATM equity offering sales agreement), NEOG -2% (CFO/COO to depart), AVPT -1.4% (mixed securities shelf offering), OPAL -1% (completes sale of investment tax credits), KLAR -0.4% (Installment plans now available for in-store Apple Pay purchases in the US and UK), CTRI -0.2% (completes separation from Southwest Gas), SPGI -0.2% (collaboration with Cambridge Associates and Mercer)

>>> US Close Dow +0.11% S&P +0.47% Nasdaq +0.94% Russell +0.34%

Closing Market Summary: Mega-cap strength lifts indexes to new highs ahead of Fed decision
The stock market kicked off the week with index-level gains that saw the S&P 500 (+0.5%) and Nasdaq Composite (+0.9%) secure new all-time intraday and closing highs, while the DJIA (+0.1%) lagged. Gains were largely concentrated in a select group of mega-cap leaders, which continued to flex their influence over index performance.

Shares of Tesla (TSLA 410.04, +14.10, +3.56%) surged early after it was reported that CEO Elon Musk purchased around 2.6 million shares of stock worth nearly $1 billion on Friday, his first open market purchase of the stock since February 2020. Though the stock finished well off its session highs, it still added substantial gains to its impressive September run and helped the consumer discretionary sector (+1.1%) finish among the best-performing S&P 500 sectors.

The communication services sector (+2.3%) comfortably outpaced all other sectors today as Alphabet (GOOG 251.76, +10.38, +4.30%) hit fresh records, becoming just the fourth U.S. company to surpass $3 trillion in market value.

With additional solid showings from Amazon (AMZN 231.43, +3.28, +1.44%), Meta Platforms (META 764.70, +9.11, +1.21%), and Microsoft (MSFT 515.36, +5.46, +1.07%), the Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF advanced 0.9% today.

The information technology sector (+0.8%) traded flattish out of the gate, nursing a loss in NVIDIA (NVDA 177.75, -0.07, -0.04%), which traded lower following reports that China found the company to be in violation of its anti-monopoly law. The company issued a statement in response reaffirming their compliance with the law "in all respects," and the stock finished near its flatline.

Elsewhere in the sector, Seagate Tech (STX 211.12, +15.13, +7.72%) and Western Digital (WDC 102.39, +4.73, +4.84%) furthered their strong recent runs as HDD prices continue to increase due to tight supply and strong demand for large-capacity drives fueled by AI-driven storage requirements.

The industrials (+0.5%) and utilities (+0.2%) sectors round out the five S&P 500 sectors that advanced today.

Of the six sectors that finished lower, only the consumer staples (-1.2%), health care (-1.0%), and materials (-0.8%) finished with losses wider than 0.5%.

While today's action resulted in decent index level gains, the advance was dependent on the strong performances of several mega-cap names. The S&P 500 Equal Weighted Index (-0.2%) finished with a loss today, markedly underperforming the market-weighted S&P 500 (+0.5%).

Today's gains came on lighter-than-average volume, reflecting a cautious tone as investors await this week's FOMC meeting for clarity on the policy path ahead.

With a 25-basis point rate cut already fully priced in, homebuilder stocks retreated in what looked like an early "sell-the-news" move, leaving the iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF down 1.3%.

Meanwhile, smaller-cap names delivered a mixed showing after their recent strength on firming rate cut expectations, with the Russell 2000 closing with a 0.3% gain while the S&P MidCap 400 slipped 0.1%.

On the trade front, the U.S. and China reached a framework agreement to transition TikTok to U.S.
ownership, with a scheduled call between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday to finalize discussions.

U.S. Treasuries began the week with gains across the curve. The 2-year note yield settled down three basis points to 3.53%, and the 10-year note yield settled down three basis points to 4.03%.
  • Nasdaq Composite: +15.7% YTD
  • S&P 500: +12.5% YTD
  • DJIA: +7.9% YTD
  • Russell 2000: +7.9% YTD
  • S&P Mid Cap 400: +5.1% YTD

Reviewing today's data:
  • The Empire State Manufacturing survey fell to -8.7 in September (consensus 3.0) from 11.9 in August.

FT : Amazon to launch augmented reality football coverage

Amazon to launch augmented reality football coverage
‘Prime Vision’ service featuring gaming-style graphics comes as sports broadcasters seek to boost youth engagement

Amazon will this week debut a new feed for live football matches featuring augmented reality data graphics and real-time tactical analysis, the latest attempt by a sports broadcaster to improve engagement, especially among younger people.

Prime Vision will make its first appearance in the UK on Tuesday night during the first round of Uefa Champions League matches, including Tottenham Hotspur vs Villareal. The alternative feed includes automated graphics such as players’ names, running speeds and jump heights overlaid on the live video stream.

Shots on target will generate instant pop-ups showing ball speed and goal probability, while circles will spin under players with the ball at their feet or open for a pass.

Amazon has also developed a “momentum bar”, showing which team is more likely to score next, and a “tactical map” highlighting the live position of every player on the pitch.

Executives hope these visual “enhancements” will help keep fans more engaged with the action on the pitch.


“Prime Vision allows us to experiment and test an all-new broadcast,” said Alex Green, managing director of Prime Video Sport’s international division. “We are going to take the time to listen to fans and add functionality in the years to come.”

The long-term goal is to create a suite of graphic and data options that viewers will be able to customise themselves while watching live matches.

Prime Vision was first rolled out in the US in 2022 as part of Amazon’s coverage of the National Football League. Amazon said viewership of its Thursday night coverage of the NFL, including the Prime Vision feed, is on average seven years younger than those watching through traditional cable services.

The NFL has been at the forefront of experimenting with new forms of live sports broadcast. Last year’s Super Bowl was aired on children’s network Nickelodeon, with cartoon characters SpongeBob SquarePants and Patrick Starfish used as live pundits and augmented reality showing young fans virtual green slime sprayed over the end zone after a touchdown.

Many broadcasters have been trialling new ways to present live sports feeds, amid growing fears that younger viewers have been losing interest or switching off.

In 2023, YouGov reported 31 per cent of global sports fans aged 18-24 were watching live matches, compared with 75 per cent of people aged 55 and over. Younger people preferred to watch highlights, follow athletes on social media or engage with their favourite sports through video games.

Rights holders have increasingly looked to gaming for inspiration. Prime Vision borrows heavily from the visuals that have been commonplace for years in popular football video games, such as football game EA FC — successor to the Fifa series — and NFL title Madden.

This year the NFL, technology company Genius Sports and Electronic Arts joined forces to create a live feed of a match that was presented to viewers as if it were a video game. The Premier League has worked with Sky Sports to create a “game mode” for its live broadcasts and acquired a stake in Rezzil, a virtual reality software company.

SCMP : Why younger Europeans can see their futures in China, despite the obstacl

Why younger Europeans can see their futures in China, despite the obstacles
As China ramps up its search for foreign tech expertise, a new generation of talent finds its perspectives on the country are changing

More than two years after stringent Covid-19 restrictions prompted an exodus of foreigners from China, there are emerging signs that Europeans are cautiously rekindling interest in pursuing opportunities in the country, despite challenges such as visa uncertainties, limited internet access and geopolitical tensions.

For many Europeans eyeing global opportunities, China brims with great potential in technology, entrepreneurship and other aspects.

“It’s not just about career growth but also about being part of a system where things are changing fast,” said Simon Wold, a Swedish student doing his master’s in European intellectual property (IP) law at Stockholm University.

According to Wold, working in China, a country where IP protection still has room to develop, is “far more exciting” than staying in the European Union (EU) where everything is already settled and rigid, although he admitted to being something of an an “outlier”, as most of his peers in the niche field of IP law were more keen on Germany, Britain, the United States or France.
There also seemed to be an age divide in outlook, Wold suggested.

“Among younger people I’ve spoken to, the idea [of working in China] is appealing. They see Shenzhen’s rise, Shanghai’s infrastructure and China’s pace of growth and are curious,” he said.

“Older people I’ve spoken to tend to warn me against it, saying China is polluted, poor and a developing country, but I think their image of China is stuck in the 1980s. When I’ve shown them what modern China actually looks like, they’re usually shocked to the core.”

Inspired by a polyglot YouTuber, Wold started to learn Mandarin in 2018, seeing Chinese “as the language of the future, especially when China is key in trade, technology and business”.

“Since I’m studying European intellectual property law, being able to combine that with Mandarin will give me an edge in bridging EU-China relations in this field,” he said.

The relationship between China and the European Union has evolved significantly since diplomatic ties were established in 1975, with annual trade surging by more than 300 per cent since then.

In recent years, however, the robust economic partnership has become increasingly strained by political tensions, trade imbalances and differing values.

Chinese President Xi Jinping has pledged wider opening up this year to boost cooperation with the 27-nation bloc, describing China and the EU as the two “constructive” powers in the world amid growing US-China tensions.

The effort has focused on traditional areas like automobiles, machinery manufacturing, energy, chemicals and aerospace, while expanding collaboration in emerging fields such as digital, green energy, biopharmaceutical, artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum technologies.

Many Europeans are excited about the opportunities, but factors such as restricted internet access, uncertainties over securing visas and concerns about the politicisation of business are significant considerations.

Alain Saas, a French national who founded a Canada-based AI start-up, expressed unwavering enthusiasm for working in China. “Yes, 1,000 per cent,” he said, when asked if he wanted to live in China to ride the tech wave.

However, Saas has chosen to relocate to Japan as he lived there before and it is close to China. He has also yet to find an opening in China and is concerned about issues such as internet restrictions there.

“The technology [in Japan] does not represent the future as much any more, unlike when I first moved there in 2010, and I would be much more excited by the future in China,” he said.

China has achieved remarkable progress in technology and innovation, transforming into a global powerhouse in areas like AI, robotics, quantum computing and renewable energy, thanks to years of massive state-funded research and development and a strong manufacturing ecosystem.

Still, Saas is bothered by Beijing’s Great Firewall, which blocks access to many foreign websites and apps and slows cross-border traffic, and the uncertainties for foreigners trying to obtain long-term visas or residency status.

It just took him three weeks from application to receiving a five-year highly skilled professional visa for Japan. After working there for one year, someone of his category can obtain permanent residency, with the same rights as a Japanese citizen, except for voting, he said.

“Paperwork costs nothing, is super easy and I get my residency card on arrival at the airport,” he said, adding these things could be more complicated in China, citing experiences shared by his friends.

According to China’s immigration regulations, foreigners who have held senior positions – such as deputy general manager or an equivalent role – for at least four consecutive years, and have lived in China for at least three years with a good tax record, are eligible to apply for permanent residency.

Those who have made significant and outstanding contributions to China or who are urgently needed by the country are also eligible.

But getting a visa to live in China as a foreign entrepreneur is not easy. The application process is complex, requiring navigation of local regulations and submission of extensive documentation, including employment contracts and proof of qualifications, all of which then undergo thorough scrutiny by the authorities.

In a bid to attract top global talent and strengthen its innovation ecosystem, China is introducing new measures aimed at easing entry for skilled professionals in science and technology.

Last month, Beijing announced a new category of K visas for young science and technology talent from overseas, taking effect on October 1.
Eligible applicants include STEM graduates from recognised universities or research institutions worldwide holding at least a bachelor’s degree, or young professionals engaged in relevant education or research work at such institutions.

There is no requirement for a Chinese employer or inviter at the application stage.

Holders of K visas can be engaged in education, research, cultural exchange, entrepreneurship or business in China.

While the detailed implementation guidelines have yet to be announced, Hong Kong-based business consultancy Dezan Shira & Associates expects the K visa to offer greater flexibility regarding the number of entries permitted, validity period and duration of stay.

Sean, an Irish national who asked that only his first name be used, said the K visa concept was good and fit well into China’s broader talent attraction strategy. However, he added that the success of the programme would depend on its practicality and implementation.

“To some degree the appeal of China has dropped due to China-US decoupling, foreigners’ experience during the Covid lockdown and a perceived lack of work-life balance,” the Dublin resident said.

Still, Sean said he would love to work in China, particularly in Shanghai – because of its vibrancy and quality of life.

“In my sector – biotech pharmaceuticals – the innovation coming out of China now is quite remarkable, a bit like AI but is less well known, and I like the people of China, so much great food and beautiful places,” Sean said.

According to the most recent official census data, around 1.4 million foreigners were living in China as of November 2020. Of these, 845,000 were in mainland China and the rest distributed among Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.

Most of China’s foreigners are drawn to the big cities. But between 2010 to 2020, the number of immigrants fell by more than 21 per cent in Shanghai and 41.5 per cent in Beijing, as many left the country during the stringent zero-Covid policies, which included strict travel restrictions and lockdowns.

Many of those who left did not return after China reopened its borders in early 2023. Shanghai was home to 72,000 foreign workers at the end of 2023, according to official data.

That was about one-third the number who were working in the Chinese financial hub in early 2019, according to a report by Jiefang Daily, a publication affiliated with the Communist Party.

Higher living costs and escalating geopolitical tensions between China and the West have also contributed to a decline in the number of Western expats working in major Chinese cities.

Ioana Kraft, human resources working group chair at the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, welcomed the introduction of the K visa but cautioned about details still to be worked out in terms of education and work experience requirements, as well as age restrictions.

“We need more clarity about the permitted activities for K visa holders [and which] entrepreneurial business activities are suggested to be allowed. But we need to see if they [can] come in if a business has been started, or can they [only] come into the country on that visa and then start the business here?” Kraft said.

“So there are still lots of question marks. Although in principle, it’s always a step forward to attract foreign talent and make it easier for them to come.”

Kraft also expressed concerns about Europe’s deteriorating perception of China, partly due to the “politicisation of business”, as seen in the recent exit ban imposed on an American banker, she said.
China confirmed in July that it had barred a senior Wells Fargo executive from leaving the country because of a “criminal case” investigation.

Reports earlier said that Chenyue Mao, an Atlanta-based managing director at the American banking giant and a US citizen, had been prevented from leaving China. Wells Fargo has since suspended all business travel to China.

“Some CEOs are even reluctant to come into China for a short period because they are afraid if there is a legal dispute that involves their companies, they may not be able to leave the country,” said Kraft, who has lived in Shanghai for 22 years.

In addition to limited internet access and high living costs – as much as 400,000 yuan (US$11,000) for international school tuition, for instance – many companies now require fewer foreigners in China because the domestic workforce is just as capable of filling key roles, she added.

Cameron Johnson, a US citizen and senior partner at business consultancy Tidalwave Solutions in Shanghai, said that local talent had caught up in many ways.

“Having an expatriate here is incredibly expensive. Because the local talent gap has shrunk so much, you could actually hire two or three seasoned Chinese [staff instead],” Johnson said.

But he also emphasised the great career opportunities in China for expats, saying that this was because it was in many aspects the centre of the world for technology, manufacturing and supply chain integration, or for R&D.

“If you are in EVs [electric vehicles], semiconductors or rare earths or biotechnology, China is the leader, or No 2 in all those areas. You have to be here. If you are not here, then you will fail as a company,” he said.

“And so that is why China, in many ways, is still positive. Then there are of course many challenges, but the government is still very supportive of developing the industries of tomorrow and today.”

FT : Swiss reject plan to delay parts of UBS capital reform

Swiss reject plan to delay parts of UBS capital reform
Government will be allowed to make some changes by executive ordinance rather than parliamentary process

Swiss lawmakers have rejected a plan to delay some bank capital reforms, paving the way for the government to introduce measures that could increase UBS’s capital requirements by $3bn without going through parliament.

The upper house on Monday voted against a proposal that would have delayed and bundled together measures around capital quality with the rest of a package of “too big to fail” rules set out by the government in June.

The result means that the Swiss government can now mandate the capital quality changes by executive order, while the larger part of the reform package goes through parliament as the country tries to guard against a repeat of the Credit Suisse debacle.

The government previously said that UBS might need as much as $26bn in extra capital to ensure Switzerland could withstand a crisis at its enlarged national champion, although the bank has put the figure closer to $24bn.

Analysts and investors have been betting on the proposals being diluted through trade-offs as they progress through Switzerland’s consensus-driven political system, helping lift UBS’s share price more than 20 per cent since the day before the too-big-to-fail reforms were announced.

The rally has come despite the proposals being far more stringent than those in other countries, particularly the requirement for UBS to bolster the capital of its foreign subsidiaries, which accounts for $23bn of the requirements.

The finance department said in June the overall reforms would become law at the start of 2028 “at the earliest”, while UBS would be given a transition period of “at least six to eight years” to implement the changes once the legislation comes into force.

The capital quality changes relate to how banks quantify items such as deferred tax assets, in-house software and others on their books. Although they would only increase UBS’s capital requirements by about $3bn, they are now likely to come into effect far sooner than the other reforms.

Switzerland’s wider package of reforms also envisages tighter liquidity rules and expanded powers for the financial regulator Finma, which was widely criticised for failing to prevent Credit Suisse’s downfall in 2023. Finance minister Karin Keller-Sutter has argued that rapid implementation is vital to strengthen financial stability, warning against further delays.

But UBS has lobbied intensely against the scale and speed of the changes, saying the measures go further than those required of global peers and would reduce its ability to compete internationally.

UBS executives have also been pushing the idea in private that the bank could move its headquarters outside of Switzerland if the proposals were not watered down, according to people familiar with the matter.

While some senior Swiss bankers are taking such a threat seriously, others see it as a negotiating tactic and say it is very unlikely to happen.

Many lawmakers share concerns that rushing through such a complex overhaul could have unintended consequences.

One parliamentarian with knowledge of the discussions between MPs said ahead of the vote that the outcome was “more negative for UBS” than if the reforms had been bundled together.

Another Swiss lawmaker speaking on condition of anonymity ahead of the vote said they still expected there to ultimately be compromise. “There is still a long way to go on this legislation. I do not expect every reform to be implemented,” the person said. “The point is that there is more open discussion happening about the economic consequences of the legislation.”

Even so, uncertainty continues to weigh on UBS, and investors remain wary of the long-term costs of the reforms. Most continental lenders outperformed UBS during the first five months of the year and the Swiss bank remains a laggard.

Shares in UBS closed up 2.35 per cent on Monday.

WSJ : iOS 26: Liquid Glass Is Here and Your iPhone Will Never Be the Same

iOS 26: Liquid Glass Is Here and Your iPhone Will Never Be the Same
In this guide to the biggest iPhone software change in years, here is what’s new, what you can undo, and what you’ll need to live with

Good. We’re calm now—calm enough to face the reality that your iPhone is about to look like a digital fish tank, permanently full of water. Sorry, not water…Liquid Glass.

It’s iOS 26, where Apple AAPL 0.79%increase; green up pointing triangle has draped your icons and menus in a translucent, shimmery look. On Monday, the company rolled out the biggest software overhaul in a decade, and everyone with an iPhone 11 or newer model can get it.

And no, you didn’t miss seven versions: Apple jumped from iOS 18 to 26 to match the year. How very Windows 95.

There are parts of the new look I like. But while Apple set out to streamline the design and make it easier on the eyes, the plans sometimes backfired. Core tools and familiar elements are moved, and in some places text is harder to read. Mercifully, some of it can be adjusted.

There are also plenty of practical new features that make life better, including a built-in assistant that waits on hold for you, spam text filtering and helpful messaging tricks.

As always, my annual advice holds—maybe now more than ever: If you’re concerned about bugs or battery life, wait a bit before you update. When you’re feeling ready, head to Settings > General > Software Update.

Maybe you think you’ll never be ready for such a big change? Keep breathing. We’ll paddle the Liquid Glass rapids together. In keeping with tradition, I’ve gone for another iOS tip world record: 26 tips for iOS 26 in my video. Watch that for the deep dive.

Lessen the Liquid Glass
When I started living with the new aesthetic this summer, my reaction was somewhere between “This is bad” and “This is really bad.” But that was the beta software. Over time, Apple softened some of the worst of it. Also? I resigned myself to living in a glass house.

You’ll see it immediately: Menus are see-through, giving everything a layered look. Sometimes it’s a neat effect. Other times, especially with light backgrounds, it can be a mess. Text vanishes into whatever’s behind it.

You can turn most of it off. Go to Settings > Accessibility > Display & Text Size > Reduce Transparency. Or, if you just want it toned down, toggle on Increase Contrast in the same menu. Try both and see what your eyes prefer.

If you decide to embrace the look, choose darker wallpapers and try Apple’s new, resizable frosted-glass clock on the Lock Screen.

Relearn the apps
In the redesign, Apple has also reshuffled some of the essentials:

• Phone: The bottom bar has lost the Favorites and Voicemail tabs. To bring them back, head to the Calls tab, tap the three lines in the top right, and choose Classic.

• Camera: The bottom of the app is stripped down to just Photo and Video buttons. Want Portrait or other shooting modes? Press and slide. Need timers or flash? Swipe up on those same buttons. Because nothing says simplicity like a hidden menu.

• Search: The search bar has packed its bags and moved to the bottom of the screen—everywhere. Messages, Notes, Podcasts, you name it, it’s now hanging out at the bottom. And no, you can’t put it back on top (unless you’re in Safari). Two months in, though, I believe it’s actually better: easier thumb access.

Try the new tricks
Some updated features have real utility. Ironically, my two favorites are for us dinosaurs who still make phone calls.

• Call Screening: Instead of letting calls from unknown numbers go to voicemail, you can turn on call screening. “Record your name and reason for calling, I’ll see if this person is available,” the software asks callers who aren’t saved in your Contacts. Then it shows the transcription on your phone so you can decide if you want to pick up. To turn this on go to Settings > Apps > Phone > Screen Unknown Callers > Ask Reason for Calling.


• Hold Assist: No more 1990s smooth jazz loops repeated over and over and over on your customer-service call. When you’re on hold, tap the call screen’s More button and select Hold Assist. The call will be muted and run silently in the background. A live transcript will appear on the call screen, and when a representative finally picks up, your phone will ring you back in.

• Screenshot smarts: If you’ve got an iPhone 15 Pro or newer, you get a few Apple Intelligence screenshot tricks. Take your screenshot then tap the Search button to look up whatever’s in the image—say, a product page in a shopping app. Circle an object to focus the search. Hit the chat button to ask ChatGPT directly. If you don’t love the interface, you can go to Settings > General > Screen Capture > Turn off Full-Screen Previews. Another bonus if you’ve got Apple Intelligence: live translation during phone calls.

And yes, Android has long had all of this. But hey, better late than never.

Uncover the treats
Finally, my favorite part of the annual release: The buried new tools that actually make the day-to-day easier.

• Messages: You can now add polls to Messages, which means no more 45-text debates about sushi vs. Thai for dinner. Just tap the + button in a chat and select Polls. At long last, group texts finally have typing indicators. There’s also a built-in spam filter, which corrals political texts and other junk to their own section without needing a third-party app.

• Clock: In Appleland, snoozing always lasted nine minutes. Now you can choose one to 15 minutes. Apple’s gift to people who want to be exactly seven minutes late.

• More fun: You can now select only a part of a long text message or chunk of text, just tap and hold, then tap Select.

In the new Preview app, migrated from the Mac, you can scan documents and handle PDFs much easier.

And if you have Apple Intelligence, you can now combine two emojis into one. I went with “exhaling” + “iPhone” to capture my reaction to iOS 26: Keep Calm and Liquid Glass On…or Off. Whatever you decide.

WWD : Tariffs and Price Hikes Drive Shoppers to the Secondhand Luxury Handbag Ma

Tariffs and Price Hikes Drive Shoppers to the Secondhand Luxury Handbag Market
As inflation and tariffs bite, consumers turn to resale platforms for more affordable luxury bags.

PARIS – U.S. tariffs of 15 percent on imports from the European Union are bad news for beleaguered luxury brands already struggling with softening demand. But they’re proving a goldmine for the secondhand market, which is booming as shoppers seek out more affordable alternatives.

They are increasingly migrating to resale platforms, not only for the savings but also for greater access, authenticity and sustainability. With price increases compounding across categories — often driven by brands like Hermès, Louis Vuitton and Chanel, which often raise prices — pre-owned luxury now represents a more accessible path to luxury brands.

“The sector is relatively healthy,” said UBS analyst Jay Sole, who follows The RealReal. “It’s not a question of demand, it’s a question of supply. If there are legitimate, authenticated luxury goods available, consumers will buy.”

The new tariffs are adding to the inflationary pressures and post-pandemic buoyancy that have already driven retail prices sky-high. But for resale platforms, the result has been a growing pricing gap between full-price and pre-owned items — a difference that benefits platforms that maintain stable average selling prices.

“Despite the new 15 percent tariffs, average selling prices on the resale market have remained stable — including handbags — making secondhand an even more affordable alternative as firsthand prices continue to climb,” said Maximilian Bittner, chief executive officer of Vestiaire Collective.

Recommerce platform Fashionphile is also seeing that shift play out.

Demand ticked up even before the tariff rate was finalized. “We’ve seen some early activity — people buying before price hikes, and increased listings by owners anticipating higher retail replacement costs,” said Fashionphile founder and president Sarah Davis. “Shoppers are very responsive around those changes. They are buying or selling according to the market and pricing announcements.”

Brand price hikes, including Hermès and Louis Vuitton’s earlier this year, also created a pre-emptive panic among buyers. “This always brings out ‘buy-before-it-gets-more-expensive’ behavior,” she added, while sellers have had a more wait-and-see approach in hopes that offers will increase.

While some price-sensitive consumers are pulling back from new retail purchases, they aren’t necessarily leaving the luxury market. “There are some buyers who have said they shop from us because they’ve been pushed to their limits,” said Davis. “We know that many of those same consumers are migrating to pre-owned rather than exiting the category entirely.”

As tariffs tighten pressure on retail pricing, resale platforms are well-positioned to capture the shift.

Even with economic uncertainty and seasonal slowdowns, resale platforms say consumer interest has remained stable.

“Demand has remained steady month-over-month, highlighting the resilience and attractiveness of the secondhand market,” Bittner said, noting that order volumes from June to August did not see the typical seasonal dip.

In the current climate, the pressure is pushing sellers to list more and buyers to act faster — particularly as new prices continue to climb.

The most sought-after brands on the resale market remain consistent across platforms. Chanel, Hermès, Louis Vuitton, Dior and Gucci top both demand and gross merchandise value.

According to Davis, even amid macroeconomic caution and viral criticism of pricing — particularly following an investigation by Italian prosecutors which alleged Dior paid a supplier 53 euros to assemble a handbag that would sold for upward of 2,600 euros in its boutiques, which amplified on TikTok earlier this year — resale prices have held strong.

“Pricing for Dior has not taken a hit, even on the book tote,” she said.

At the same time, more under-the-radar but in-the-know like U.S. luxury brands like The Row and Khaite are gaining traction. They’re some of Fashionphile’s hottest selling styles.

Recent high-profile creative director shifts at major houses such as Demna to Gucci, Pierpaolo Piccioli to Balenciaga and Matthieu Blazy to Chanel have yet to significantly impact resale demand. Davis noted that designers have not yet launched collections under their new roles, limiting opportunities for renewed consumer interest or, conversely, nostalgia.

“Designer ‘chess moves’ have not yet generated a measurable impact on resale demand or brand awareness,” said Bittner.

However, history suggests that once new collections debut on the runway, resale interest often spikes.

“A designer really can make all the difference and we’ve seen new designers pump up the resale value of even discontinued, older styles. When Daniel Lee breathed new life into Bottega [Veneta], it not only helped with current resale brands but prices for older bags benefited,” said Davis.

For example, following Céline’s reintroduction of the Phantom bag in July, searches for the style increased tenfold compared to the previous month, Bittner noted.

Vintage in particular has emerged as a breakout category, representing legacy and original-era items more than 20 years old.

Bittner said that vintage listings have grown 220 percent in the past five years, while searches for vintage items have increased fivefold. With some vintage handbags from big brands can be priced as low as $100, they hold significant appeal for aspirational buyers facing sticker shock over new goods.

On Sept. 4, Vestiaire launched its “Vintage Pieces at Vintage Prices” campaign, offering heritage handbags at their original price points — a move designed to attract those value-driven aspirational buyers.

“Vintage icons carry the same timeless appeal as modern re-editions, at up to 70 percent less,” Bittner said. “That makes resale not only desirable, but strategic.”

Still, price sensitivity remains a key theme. “There are some buyers who have said that they shop from us because they’ve been pushed to their limits. Economically sensitive consumers pull back on big discretionary new buys,” Davis added. “We know that many of those same consumers are migrating to pre-owned rather than exiting the category entirely.”

According to Sole, the UBS analyst, resale’s ongoing challenge is not moving inventory — it’s acquiring it. “Demand is there. It’s about supply,” he said. By some estimates, there is $200 billion worth of potential inventory in U.S. closets, and it’s a matter of making them available to the eager resale buyer.

The current economic environment, he suggested, could help change that. “If consumers who own luxury goods, who have a bunch of handbags sitting in their closet, feel like they want to turn that inventory into cash, that would be really compelling. That would be a catalyst for growth,” he said.