(BFW) Greenlight Capital Funds Fell 9.1% in 3Q, 26% YTD: Letter


Greenlight Capital Funds Fell 9.1% in 3Q, 26% YTD: Letter
2018-10-05 16:37:57.214 GMT


By Janet Freund and Joshua Fineman
(Bloomberg) -- David Einhorn’s Greenlight Capital added
Altice USA and BT Group as longs in 3Q, according to letter to
shareholders. Greenlight Capital says it had "another difficult
quarter" as funds fell 9.1% in 3Q and year-to-date have lost
25.7%.
* Greenlight draws parallels to Tesla and Lehman; TSLA shares
fall to session lows
** Thinks TSLA’s deception "is about to catch up" to it
* Exited long positions in Micron and Twitter and TransDigm
short
* Sold last of Apple shares on Aug. 31 at $228/share; says AAPL
investment earned Greenlight over $1b
* Covered 11-year old short in Martin Marietta
* Exited multi-year long in Mylan
* Some of the notable losing positions during the quarter
included Bayer, CNX Resources, GM
* Calls GM Cruise’s development "funding secured"
* "The market appears to be rejecting our entire strategy of
value investing and the mark-to-market losses have affected
nearly our entire portfolio," the letter said
* "Few agree with us on most of our positions"
* Greenlight had two investment analyst departures and two
investment analyst additions: James Lin and Andy Kaplan exited
and Ethan Auerbach and Toby Haselberger joined
* Greenlight’s largest disclosed long positions at quarter-end
were AerCap, Brighthouse Financial, GM, Green Brick Partners,
and gold
* NOTE: July 31, Einhorn Bemoans Results as Greenlight Fund
Slides 19% This Year


To contact the reporters on this story:
Janet Freund in New York at jfreund11@bloomberg.net;
Joshua Fineman in New York at jfineman@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Catherine Larkin at clarkin4@bloomberg.net

WSJ : The Achilles’ Heel for Italy’s Populists: Weak Banks

The Achilles’ Heel for Italy’s Populists: Weak Banks
New government’s plans for higher deficit unsettle investors as much as they do Italy’s European partners

ROME—As Italy’s populist government approaches a showdown with the European Union over its budget, financial-market tremors are hurting the country’s banking system and threatening the economic growth Rome wants to stimulate.

Italian bank shares and bonds have suffered sharp selloffs in the past week as Italy’s government stumbled toward a budget that looks set to break EU rules on fiscal discipline. Rome’s new, EU-skeptic governing coalition between the antiestablishment 5 Star Movement and the nativist League has said it aims for a budget deficit of 2.4% of gross domestic product next year, three times what the previous, pro-EU government planned.

Rome’s optimistic forecasts for growth and tax revenues are expected to draw tough scrutiny from EU authorities, who fear the true deficit could end up dangerously high for a country with an already worrisome national debt. The 5 Star and League’s fiery rhetoric against EU officials have further spooked foreign investors, who fear the European Central Bank—the ultimate guarantor of bond-market stability in the eurozone—is unlikely to support a government that defies the bloc’s economic orthodoxy.

Despite some stabilization in markets since Wednesday, after the government promised slightly smaller deficits in the medium term, Italian bonds and banks remain under heavy pressure.

“It is almost killing the recovery of the banking sector. And this will be a shock for the economy,” said Nicola Nobile, a Milan-based economist for forecasting company Oxford Economics. The danger, he said, is a return of the credit crunch that choked off Italy’s recovery after the eurozone crisis earlier this decade.


ECB President Mario Draghi warned last month that credit has become costlier in Italy’s economy as a result of market tensions fueled by anti-EU rhetoric emanating from Rome. “Words have created some damage,” Mr. Draghi said.

Italy’s political leaders continue to lambaste EU officials tasked with enforcing the bloc’s fiscal rulebook. Dismissing “threats from Europe,” League leader Matteo Salvini on Wednesday quoted an expression from an early 20th-century militant nationalist poet meaning “I don’t give a damn.”

Higher borrowing costs for Italian businesses and households could counteract the economic boost the government is hoping to achieve via fiscal stimulus. The 5 Star wants to raise welfare spending by introducing a universal basic income for the poor and unemployed, while the League wants to cut taxes and lower the pension age. As the coalition’s more radical members from both parties wrestle with cautious officials such as Finance Minister Giovanni Tria, the government has missed its deadline under Italian law for publishing fiscal and economic projections. The country is supposed to submit a detailed budget plan to the EU by Oct. 15.

The eurozone is far more stable now than during its existential crisis of 2010-12, when capital flight nearly destroyed the common currency. Most of its national economies are growing, including Italy’s, though with less momentum than a year ago. The region’s political strains continue to worsen, however, as voters turn against the old center-right and center-left parties that built today’s Europe. Those legacy parties are widely blamed for problems including the economic scars of the crisis years, immigration and security.

Italy’s League and 5 Star are two of the many political movements around Europe riding the antiestablishment wave. Their radical spending and tax-cutting ideas and their demands for greater national sovereignty within the EU are testing Europe’s existing order—including its process of financial healing from the crisis era.

Having spent recent years trying to write down their mountain of bad loans, Italian banks this year had started to embark on new lending. But that effort has been hampered by repeated financial turbulence of which last week’s was only the most recent. In August total loans to companies and consumers fell to the lowest level for two years, according to data from the Italian Banking Association.

“Banks are restricting credit. They are struggling to deploy their liquidity,” said Mario Ravagnan, chief executive of Ravagnan SpA, an engineering company from near Venice.

The market turmoil is hitting banks’ funding costs and their capital cushions. Yields on Italian bank bonds have shot up this week. On Thursday, a bond maturing in Jan. 2023 from UniCredit SpA, Italy’s biggest bank by assets, yielded 2.67%, compared with just over 1% when first issued early this year.

The cost of insuring against default on $10 million of UniCredit’s debt—like that of Italy’s second-biggest lender, Intesa Sanpaolo SpA—has nearly tripled since the start of the year, in another sign that investors are treating the banks as risky and likely to demand higher interest for future funding. UniCredit and Intesa declined to comment.


Italian banks face heavy borrowing needs in coming months and years. Some need to strengthen their capital buffers to satisfy regulators. The sector also needs to repay some €250 billion ($289 billion) of ECB loans that fall due in 2020-21, and funding that can’t all be left until late.

Earlier this year, Banca Carige SpA had to scrap a planned bond sale, blaming “market conditions.” In July the Genoa-based bank received a warning about its thin capital cover from the ECB, which is pushing it to submit a capital plan or consider a merger.

“Banks need to operate in a stable macro environment, and if the sovereign uncertainty leads to market risk-aversion, the banks will find it more difficult to issue funding at convenient prices—or even issue funding at all,” said Paola Biraschi, an analyst at CreditSights.

The sinking value of Italian government bonds already eroded the core capital of the country’s banks over the summer, according to research by Credit Suisse. Less capital makes banks less able to write down bad loans or make new ones.

Analysts at Morgan Stanley say Banco BPM SpA, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA and UBI Banca SpA, among Italy’s biggest lenders, are the most vulnerable because of the size of their exposure to Italian government debt. MPS and Banco BPM declined to comment. UBI said it was cutting its government-bond holdings and remained relaxed about current market turbulence.

Italy’s banking sector holds more government bonds than do its counterparts in Europe’s other major economies. Italian sovereign debt makes up over 10% of total assets at the country’s banks, compared with around 2% in Germany. Italian banks have increased their purchases of government bonds this year while foreign investors have retreated from the market. That leaves the sector ever more exposed if tensions worsen between the EU and Rome’s populist rulers.

“The situation for the banks is really quite dire,” said Tom Kinmouth, fixed-income strategist at ABN Amro Bank.

FT : Carmakers race to catch up with Silicon Valley rivals

Carmakers race to catch up with Silicon Valley rivals
Developing driverless cars requires unique skills and immense amount of cash

Does a traditional carmaker or a big technology company win in autonomous vehicles?

This week’s deal between rivals Honda and General Motors to develop self-driving cars highlights how the traditional automotive industry is racing to catch up with Silicon Valley rivals.

Cruise, GM’s unit for autonomous vehicles, secured a $2.75bn investment from Honda this week just four months after SoftBank’s Vision Fund invested $2.25bn in the venture. The following day Toyota struck a partnership with SoftBank to create a range of services for self-driving vehicles.

The truth is, though, that the endeavour requires different sorts of skills from mastery of Lidar sensors to software. It also requires immense amounts of cash. Across Germany, Japan and the US, partnerships are now common.

One early leader, Waymo, has partnered with Fiat Chrysler. The self-driving unit of Google’s parent Alphabet has completed more than 9m testing miles — far more than others in the sector — and has begun a trial service for potential customers.

Another tech company, Aurora, started by former Waymo director Chris Urmson, is working with Volkswagen, Hyundai and the Chinese electric group Byton.

Other carmakers have chosen to develop their own technologies. Toyota, Renault Nissan, Daimler and Tesla are all working in-house.

>>> Shire/Takeda: Takeda’s dissident group mulling sending letters to individual

Shire/Takeda: Takeda’s dissident group mulling sending letters to individual shareholders to block deal
05 OCT 2018
A group of Takeda Pharmaceutical [TYO:4502] shareholders trying to derail the Japanese group’s GBP 46bn acquisition of Shire [LON: SHP] is considering dispatching letters to individual shareholders urging them to vote against the planned acquisition’s equity raise at its upcoming EGM, a leading member of the group told this news service.

To this end, the 130-member group, which holds 1% of the drugmaker’s shares, will seek to obtain the list of shareholders from Takeda once the name of shareholders of record on 19 October is confirmed, said the member, though he did not entirely rule out the possibility of a proxy fight.

At the same time, the group is also considering urging asset management shareholders affiliated with Takeda’s cross shareholders like Nippon Life Insurance, its financial advisor Nomura Securities and major lenders like Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group [TYO: 8306] to refrain from voting. Asset managers often find it difficult to vote against a company's proposals if their parents are major lenders or financial advisors or life insurance companies for the company, the leading member of the group said.

The member said this persuasion will be done not by directly contacting with these asset managers, but through its own website. The group will also try to persuade proxy advisor Institutional Shareholders Services (ISS) to incorporate into their recommendations a guideline urging asset managers not to vote for the deal where there is clearly conflict of interest.

Likewise, asset managers of Government Pension Investment Fund Japan (GPIF) -Takeda’s largest shareholder – should abstain from voting because almost all of them are affiliates of either Takeda’s financial advisor or lenders or cross shareholders, the member said.

For example, if an asset manager has already lost some of its clients’ money because the share price of Takeda has fallen as much as 30% year to date, that manager should not be voting in favor of the deal. “It is not right to vote in favor of the deal that has caused the huge loss for their customers,” said the member. However, the asset manager may normally find it difficult to vote against Takeda's proposal because its parent is a financial adviser for the drugmaker.

This week, the dissident group sent a letter to President Christophe Weber seeking the disclosure of its debt repayment schedule, the minutes from board of director meetings and more detailed clarification as to why the Shire acquisition is the only means to achieve Takeda’s future growth. The group has asked Takeda to respond to these questions by 31 October.
In the open letter, the group also asked why Takeda decided to pay such a huge premium of 65% to Shire shareholders at a time when the UK pharmaceutical company is set to compete in its core hemophilia business with Hemlibra, developed by Chugai [TYO:4519] and launched by Roche [VTX: ROG].

The member said Takeda needs to borrow as much as JPY 6trn (USD 52.6bn or GBP 40.5bn) for the acquisition. But the company has not even disclosed its debt repayment schedules and its forecasted earnings-per-share (EPS), said the member of the group. The only thing the shareholders know is EBITDA to weigh the pros and cons of this acquisition.

“This is just like requesting shareholders to vote blindfolded,” he said. He argues EBITDA has a defect of not being able to reflect losses from excessive R&D and M&A.

A Takeda spokesperson said almost all these items in the open letter are not answerable until the closing date under the UK takeover code.
“Clearly, it is not possible to answer all these by the 31 October deadline [set by the dissident group]. Nevertheless, we are still studying how to answer them because there must be a number of ways to respond to them,” the spokesperson added.

Takeda has set 19 October as the record date for the EGM, allowing the drugmaker to have the meeting within the three months ending 18 January 2019. Shareholders at the meeting will be able to vote on the necessary matters relating to the proposed Shire acquisition, including new share offerings.

>>> ThyssenKrupp spin-off and Industrials stake sell-down could take years

ThyssenKrupp spin-off and Industrials stake sell-down could take years - MergerMarket
05 OCT 2018
ThyssenKrupp [ETR:TKA] is targeting a shareholder vote on its proposed split at the February 2020 AGM and might retain a stake in the proposed Industrials spin-off entity for a matter of years, according to a company spokesperson.

The 12 to 18 months guidance from the company for when a shareholder vote on the split might take place is too long for most investors, according to a ThyssenKrupp shareholder spoken to by this news service.

In addition, ThyssenKrupp Materials’ stake in ThyssenKrupp Industrials should be sold as soon as possible after the spin-off occurs, dependent on market conditions, the shareholder believed.

The shareholder said they expected Materials’ stake in the Industrial entity to be a “significant minority but not a majority” and that it should not be a “strategic holding”.

The size of ThyssenKrupp Materials’ stake in the Industrials entity has not yet been decided, the spokesperson said. The company would not confirm a suggestion by a TKA supervisory board member that a 30% shareholding would be retained. The size will be decided closer to the time of the split, he said.

The range being looked at is between 20% and 40%, it is understood.

The timeline for the spin-off is in line with other recent spin-offs carried out by German companies including Bayer’s [ETR:BAYN] spin-off of Lanxess [ETR:LXS] and Metro’s [ETR:B4B] separation of Ceconomy [ETR:CEC], the spokesperson said.

The 2019 AGM is coming too soon to hold a vote, which would be the final step in the separation process, the spokesperson said. An EGM could also be called to hold such a vote, but the group is currently aiming for the 2020 AGM, he said.

Post-split M&A?

The purpose of a TKA Materials’ stake in Industrials would not be to block a takeover of the Industrial group, but to support the balance sheet of Materials, the spokesperson said.

“It’s not about control – both companies will be strong but independent from each other,” he said.

If Materials did not retain a stake in Industrials, its balance sheet would not be sufficiently capitalised, the shareholder agreed. That would be bad for Thyssenkrupp and its employees, he said.

The stake would “very probably” be eventually sold, but the timing was uncertain and perhaps not for “one or two or three years”, the spokesperson said.

In addition to Materials, activist investor Cevian Capital, and the ThyssenKrupp Foundation will be the main shareholders in the spun-off Industrials group.

The agreement of Cevian and the ThyssenKrupp Foundation would be necessary to decide whether TKA Industrials, or parts of it, would be sold following the spin-off, the shareholder said.

The Elevator business is the “crown jewel” of the Industrials unit and the split will enable its full value to be unlocked, a German M&A banker said, noting it was valued at above 15x EBITDA and could be compared with Finnish company Kone [CPH:KNEBV] and Swiss company Schindler [SWX:SCHN].

The share price reaction to Thyseenkrupp’s sepearation plans were significant, the shareholder noted. There may have been quite unrealistic expectations in terms of what this could mean, and an immediate deal with Kone might have been calculated, he suggested.

Shares in ThyssenKrupp closed up 17% on 27 September, the day it announced its spin-off plans.

“At the moment, there's a conglomerate discount on Thyssenkrupp's shares. But, with two new listed companies, their respective share prices will increase,” said a German sector lawyer said.

“There will certainly be takers for these assets but that isn't to say that it is the main reason behind the split. I guess management is just following a format that has worked for many companies of this size in Germany,” the lawyer said.

In 2016 German retailer Metro announced the split of its food business from its consumer electronics division, in a move to enable the independent companies to pursue more acquisitions. In 2012, German technology group Siemens[ETR: SIE] announced the spin-off of its lighting subsidiary Osram [ETR: OSR]. This was followed by German drug maker Bayer’s announcement to separate its polymer materials subsidiary Covestro [FRA:1COV].

(BFW) Still Unclear if Pot Investors Will Be Barred From U.S: Official


BN 10/05 18:31 *CANADIAN GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL SPEAKS ON CONDITION OF ANONYMITY
BN 10/05 18:31 *OFFICIAL: UNCLEAR YET IF POT INVESTORS CAN BE BARRED FROM U.S.

Still Unclear if Pot Investors Will Be Barred From U.S: Official
2018-10-05 18:41:59.994 GMT


By Josh Wingrove
(Bloomberg) -- It’s still unclear whether investors in the
Canadian marijuana industry will be denied entry into the U.S.,
according to a Canadian government official.
* Decision could be up to individual border guards, official
says
* Official spoke on condition of anonymity in a technical
briefing
* NOTE: Legal weed market in Canada due to open Oct. 17
* NOTE, from Sept. 6: Why the World Is Watching Canada’s Pot
Legalization: QuickTake


To contact the reporter on this story:
Josh Wingrove in Ottawa at jwingrove4@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Theophilos Argitis at targitis@bloomberg.net
Chris Fournier

(BN) Saudi Crown Prince Vows Aramco IPO by 2021, Keeps to $2 Trillion


Saudi Crown Prince Vows Aramco IPO by 2021, Keeps to $2 Trillion
2018-10-05 17:30:01.0 GMT


By Nayla Razzouk, Stephanie Flanders and Javier Blas
(Bloomberg) -- Saudi Arabia’s crown prince insisted the
stalled plan to sell shares in oil giant Aramco will go ahead,
promising an initial public offering by 2021 and sticking to his
ambitious view the state-run company is worth $2 trillion or
more.
The comments show 33-year-old Mohammed bin Salman’s
determination to press ahead with the IPO even after Riyadh’s
original timetable was undone by skepticism over the company’s
valuation and a plan for Aramco to buy a controlling stake in
the country’s biggest chemical producer.
"I believe late 2020, early 2021," he said, discussing the
timing of the IPO in an interview at the royal palace in Riyadh.
"The investor will decide the price on the day. I believe it
will be above $2 trillion. Because it will be huge."
The IPO project was first announced in 2016 as the
cornerstone of the prince’s Vision 2030 plan to modernize the
Saudi economy. Officials repeatedly said the deal was "on track,
on time" for the second half of 2018, but earlier this year they
said it would be delayed into 2019. Soon after, Aramco put the
IPO on hold and instead started talks to buy a majority stake in
local petrochemical giant Sabic, a deal potentially worth $70
billion.
*T
Read more on Aramco...
Aramco: Why Plans for Saudi Arabia’s Giant IPO Are Going
NowhereThe Aramco Accounts: Inside World’s Most Profitable
CompanyAramco Is Said to Get Cool Cool Response on IPO From U.S.
Investors
*T
Speaking late on Wednesday, surrounded by a handful of
advisers, Prince Mohammed said the IPO was "100 percent" in the
nation’s interest.
"Everyone heard about the rumors of Saudi Arabia canceling
the IPO of Aramco, delaying that, and that this is delaying
Vision 2030," he said. "This is not right."
Prince Mohammed said the IPO’s delay had its origin in
mid-2017, when it became clear that Aramco needed a push into
petrochemicals. He said it would had been unfair to go ahead
with the listing only to surprise investors soon after with a
big deal in chemicals.
The Aramco IPO would be a seismic event for financial
markets. Prince Mohammed said he hoped to raise a record $100
billion by selling a 5 percent stake, dwarfing the previous
record, set in 2014, when Chinese retailer Alibaba Group Holding
Ltd. raised $25 billion.
For Wall Street, it would be a money-maker, with banks from
JPMorgan Chase & Co. to Citigroup Inc. already working for
Aramco. Yet, in a world moving away from oil, the IPO would be a
test of the appetite of global for investors fossil fuels.
The most recent statements on when the IPO would happen
provided considerable room for maneuver. Energy Minister Khalid
Al-Falih said in August that Saudi Arabia would go ahead with
the project "at a time of its own choosing when conditions are
optimum."
Prince Mohammed has now given the company and its advisers
a new deadline, requiring the completion of the Sabic and
acquisition and a giant international share sale in less than
three years. Management and bankers will take some solace from
the fact they’ve already made many of the preparations needed
for an IPO, but it remains a daunting agenda.
Prince Mohammed said the deal between Aramco and Sabic,
which he hopes will close next year, was key for the future of
the country’s energy industry. The state-owned company can pull
it off easily due to its low debt, he said.
"If we want to have a really strong future for Aramco after
20, 30, 40 years from today, Aramco has to invest a lot in
downstream because we know that the new demand for oil 20 years
from now, it will be from petrochemicals," he said.
If Aramco had developed a separate petrochemical business,
Sabic would have definitely suffered, Prince Mohammed said,
partly because Aramco provides Sabic with the bulk of the fuel
it processes into chemicals.
Prince Mohammed said that the Saudi government will keep
the shares of Aramco after the IPO, rather than transfer them
into the sovereign wealth fund as originally planned. Instead,
the PIF will receive the $70 billion from the sale of its stake
in Sabic, plus the $100 billion that country hopes to raise from
the Aramco IPO.
"So PIF is good, the economic plans in Saudi Arabia is
good, and that deal is good for the downstream industry in Saudi
Arabia," he added, referring to the Aramco-Sabic deal.
Prince Mohammed provided a detailed timetable of his plans
for Aramco, saying that after the Sabic deal is completed in
2019, the company would need a full financial year before it can
go ahead and sell shares to the public.
"So the deal in 2019, one financial year in 2020 and then
immediately Aramco will be IPO-ed," he said late Wednesday.
"We’ve tried to push to IPO it as soon as possible, but this is
the timing, based on the situation that we have."

--With assistance from Donna Abu-Nasr, Alaa Shahine, Vivian
Nereim and Riad Hamade.

To contact the reporters on this story:
Nayla Razzouk in Riyadh at nrazzouk2@bloomberg.net;
Stephanie Flanders in Riyadh at flanders@bloomberg.net;
Javier Blas in London at jblas3@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story:
Will Kennedy at wkennedy3@bloomberg.net
Alaric Nightingale

(BLW) Trump Antitrust Enforcers Studying 5G Impact on Internet


Trump Antitrust Enforcers Studying 5G Impact on Internet
2018-10-05 17:54:59.237 GMT


By Victoria Graham
(Bloomberg Law) -- The Justice Department is assessing 5G’s
impact on the broadband marketplace to determine how it changes
both the internet service and wireless markets, the head of the
Justice Department’s antitrust division told Bloomberg Law in an
interview.
Makan Delrahim’s Oct. 4 remarks come as Sprint Corp. and T-
Mobile U.S. Inc. await approval from the DOJ and the Federal
Communications Commission on their $26.5 billion merger. The
CEOs of both companies say the deal is needed to bring forth the
next generation of wireless, 5G. A key question for regulators
reviewing the deal is whether the promised 5G rollout — which
could transform wireless and internet service markets — is worth
any harm the tie-up might cause.
5G networks, carriers say, will be much faster than the
current LTE network and are ideal for emerging technologies,
like connected cars and internet-of-things devices. Delrahim
said 5G could be a competitor in the same market as fixed
broadband. “You may not need to have a home fiber, a cable line,
to be able to get internet if you can buy that from your mobile
phone provider,” Delrahim said.
“The reverse is not necessarily true. You can’t necessarily
buy cellular telephony from Comcast or Cox as a separate
network,” he said. “But we will study that.”
Currently, most cable companies that offer wireless
services operate as “mobile virtual operators,” meaning that
wireless service is leased from another larger provider, like
Verizon Communications Inc.
Delrahim wouldn’t specifically comment on the Sprint-T-
Mobile deal because the merger is still pending. The deal causes
concern from some consumer and antitrust advocates because it
would shrink the mobile wireless marketplace from four major
nationwide competitors to three. Verizon and AT&T Inc. occupy
the top two spots. T-Mobile ranks third, and Sprint is number
four.


Big Questions

Regulators are asking generally how cable companies will
impact the wireless market. This week the FCC queried several
cable providers, such as Comcast Corp. and Charter
Communications Inc., about their new mobile phone offerings as
part of the commission’s review of the Sprint-T-Mobile deal.
According to FCC filings, regulators want a better picture
of the revenues, costs, and profitability of new cable operator
wireless plans.
Such a move is a positive sign for the pending Sprint-T-
Mobile deal because it shows the FCC is interested in how cable
companies can boost the wireless market. The addition of Cox or
Charter in the wireless market could soften the blow of losing
Sprint as a competitor.


High Bar

Delrahim’s comments to Bloomberg Law build on his earlier
statement that the rollout of 5G will change the internet market
by giving customers a different way to go online aside from
cable or fiber fixed connections.
But the parties seeking a merger approval still have to
prove their case. “Efficiency” claims — i.e., that the merger’s
benefits outweigh any anticompetitive problems — must be
recognized as “merger-specific,” Delrahim said in the interview.
“That doesn’t mean that the merger will bring about
efficiency, it means that but for the merger that these
efficiencies wouldn’t be possible,” he said.
Efficiencies must also be verified, Delrahim added. “It
needs to be verifiable, so that a merger will actually do that,
rather than a pie-in-the-sky promise.”
The DOJ likely will take the lead in considering how Sprint
and T-Mobile’s tie up would impact market concentration, Matthew
Schettenhelm, a Bloomberg Intelligence analyst, said in a note.
In telecom mergers, the FCC reviews deals to determine whether
they’re in the public interest, while the DOJ analyzes them to
see how they could change competition.


Push Back

Delrahim also pushed back on an Oct. 3 New York Post story
that suggested the DOJ may investigate Alphabet Inc.’s Google
for anticompetitive concerns.
Delrahim said that the DOJ will investigate potential
anticompetitive conduct cases that the FTC declines to pursue.
However, “that doesn’t mean we actually will bring a case
in every situation,” Delrahim said. “And, if we were to bring a
case, we wouldn’t discuss it until it was public.”
Delrahim’s remarks come two days after Sen. Richard
Blumenthal (D-Conn.) asked FTC Chairman Joe Simons during an
oversight hearing if he would open an investigation into
Google’s search conduct.
Simons wouldn’t verify if the FTC was probing Google but
did say the company’s actions “could be” an antitrust violation.
“I would definitely say that they are not per se legal,” Simons
added.
To contact the reporter on this story: Victoria Graham in
Washington at vgraham@bloomberglaw.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Fawn
Johnson at fjohnson@bloomberglaw.com

>>> New York Fed Nowcast: cuts Q3 GDP forecast to 2.3% from 2.5% prior; cuts Q4

New York Fed Nowcast: cuts Q3 GDP forecast to 2.3% from 2.5% prior; cuts Q4 forecast to 2.8% from 2.9% prior
- News from this week’s data releases decreased the nowcast for 2018:Q3 by 0.2 percentage point and decreased the nowcast for 2018:Q4 by 0.1 percentage point.
- A negative surprise from exports data and negative impacts from parameter revisions accounted for most of the decrease. Positive news from the ISM surveys partially offset the decrease for 2018:Q4.