FT : The year when hits just kept coming for European banks

The year when hits just kept coming for European banks
Poor profitability, outdated business models and negative rates have driven investors away en masse


When Deutsche Bank boss Christian Sewing hosted a call for his top managers in October to discuss yet another disappointing set of results he lost his cool, lashing out at their “bullshit” excuses for poor performance.

It is not hard to see why Mr Sewing and his fellow European bank chief executives feel under so much pressure these days.

The region’s lenders have had their worst year since the nadir of the eurozone crisis as a constellation of issues including anaemic profitability, outdated business models, negative rates and the seemingly perpetual farrago of Brexit have driven investors from the sector en masse.

European bank stocks have fallen on average 25 per cent — the most since 2011 when they dropped by a third — eliminating all gains made in the past six years and wiping out $380bn in shareholder value, according to analysts at Autonomous Research. Collectively they are on track to make a 2018 return on equity less than half the 16 per cent generated by their US rivals, Citigroup data show.

“Everyone hates European financials at the moment. There’s almost no discrimination in the sell off,” said Richard Buxton, chief executive of London’s Merian Global Investors. “People are concerned about profitability — rate rises look further and further out and many are convinced the next recession is around the corner.”

None of the 16 largest British, French, German, Italian or Swiss banks trade above book value. On average, they are valued at about 0.6 times their net assets, compared with ratios of 1.1 for the top six US banks and 1 for lenders on the MSCI Emerging Asia Banks Index.



At the bottom of the European pile is Mr Sewing’s Deutsche, which trades at a quarter of its book value after plunging 53 per cent during a tumultuous 2018. Germany’s biggest lender fired its CEO in the spring and last month was the subject of a two-day police raid linked to money laundering. It is struggling to retain its best staff as deferred stock bonuses have halved in value.

“When most banks are trading well below book value, many significantly below, there is clearly a major problem in Europe,” said Philipp Hildebrand, vice-chairman of BlackRock and former head of the Swiss central bank. “We have one of those really tough moments where business model issues, cyclical issues and external challenges like technology are coming together all at the same time.”

Regulators are well aware of the dangers of persistently low returns. The Bank of England and the European Central Bank have both said they are worried about lenders’ ability to earn enough to survive another prolonged economic downturn.

Mario Quagliariello, the senior European official leading the most recent round of stress tests, told the FT in November “profitability remains the key challenge”.

On the surface, things should be getting better. Analysts at Citigroup predict a 42 per cent growth in European banking profits this year on the back of an 86 per cent increase in 2017. Banks are safer, having more than doubled their capital buffers since the financial crisis and most have put their biggest misconduct fines behind them.

However, any improvements in performance have been overshadowed by geopolitical and macroeconomic worries, combined with an underlying concern banks have not altered their business models enough to reflect tougher capital standards and leverage restraints.

“The hits have just kept on coming for the European banks,” said Stuart Graham, chief executive of Autonomous Research. “2018 started as a sell-off on disappointing growth, gathered pace with the election of a new Italian government, was compounded by the ECB’s dovish rate guidance in mid-June and amplified by concerns over emerging markets, especially Turkey, and trade wars.”


Italy tops the list of worries, where a stand-off between the Eurosceptic populist government and the EU over the size of its budget deficit has led to speculation it might leave the single currency. Dire warnings also exist about possible contagion from a “doom loop” caused by the country’s weakened banks owning too much of its devaluing sovereign debt.

“It is difficult to find a marginal buyer of European banks right now and you can’t fight the tape,” Adam Gishen, chief adviser to Credit Suisse chief executive Tidjane Thiam, told the FT. “The macro is so negative that for a fund manager to make a big bet has become a very, very difficult thing to do.”

2019 looks even bleaker. The prognosis for the UK economy is highly uncertain, with the prospect of a chaotic Brexit and few economists expect European interest rates to climb out of negative territory soon. ECB president Mario Draghi said this month that eurozone risks are rising because of a number of concerns from geopolitical uncertainty to trade protectionism and market volatility.

The scale of the bank stock decline has also dented the hopes for cross-border EU M&A, which regulators say is needed to reduce competition on a continent that still has far too many lenders. For example, Deutsche boss Mr Sewing has ruled out a long-rumoured merger with Commerzbank while valuations are so low.

These days, 12-year-old Dutch online payments company Adyen is worth €13.4bn, more than Commerzbank at €8.2bn and not far off Deutsche at €15.7bn.

The lack of political progress on a pan-European capital markets union — which would allow capital and liquidity to move more freely across the bloc — and especially a common eurozone deposit insurance scheme are also major barriers to banking consolidation.

“We don’t invest in [the banking sector],” said the head of equities at one of Europe’s biggest fund management groups. “The whole bank business model is questionable.”

Much of Europe — from the UK and Germany to Spain and Italy — is beset with problems such as slim net interest margins, the prospect of asset price deflation and weak technology, they said. These make banks unattractive investments, even at current “screamingly cheap” share prices.

The equities boss at another big European asset manager said there were now no active bank investments in the company’s portfolio, pointing to low interest rates and resultant weak profitability as the key disincentive. “There is better risk-reward elsewhere,” the fund manager said.

Investors are particularly unconvinced by those Europeans still trying to compete with Wall Street in investment banking. Even though a resurgent Barclays has posted four consecutive quarters of market share growth in bond and equity trading, its stock has steadily fallen. A high-profile activist investor is trying to force it to exit large swathes of the business, arguing it absorbs too much capital for too little return.


The “migration into US-style investment banking for the most part has turned out to be a very bad adventure,” said BlackRock’s Mr Hildebrand. “We are at a point in Europe — and this has taken in my mind too long, I don’t quite understand why — where we have a recalibration” away from “something that basically hasn’t worked”.

Peter Richardson, an analyst at Berenberg in London, said: “There is definitely more scepticism about those with large investment banking operations remaining. Investors believe US franchises will continue to take a larger share of a smaller pie.”

European banks are now just 5 per cent away from hitting an all-time low relative to other sectors, analysis by Berenberg shows. Credit Suisse’s Mr Thiam — whose stock is down 35 per cent this year — said earlier this month that European banks are so cheap there is a great buying opportunity.

However, while they might seem good value trading as they are at about eight times their estimated earnings power, this is contingent on them increasing income at between 2.5 and 3 per cent a year.

“History has shown that investors have consistently overestimated banks’ ability to grow, with revenues exceeding expectations just once in the last seven years,” said Berenberg’s Eoin Mullany. “We expect the disappointment to continue. The sector remains a long-term value trap.”

Perhaps understandably, morale inside banks is low.

During an internal video recorded during the latest police raid on Deutsche, Mr Sewing faced a blunt question by a staffer: “Everyone is asking, when does this end?”

The chief executive replied: “I share the frustration . . . We’ve always said the years between 2015 and 2018 would be very busy cleaning up our issues, and we are very much at the end of this now, but still things are coming up.”

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers

Gapping up: SIRI +1.6% CCL +0.8%

Gapping down: DB -4.2%, PRGO -3.4%, JD -2.8%, BKNG -2.4%, MU -2.3%, GE -2.2%, AMD -2.2%, INTC -1.9%, IWM -1.7%, NVDA -1.6%, SPY -1.6%, DIA -1.6%, QQQ -1.5%

FT : Tax cuts one year on: ‘we are on a very unstable fiscal path’

Tax cuts one year on: ‘we are on a very unstable fiscal path’
Trump’s reforms lifted short-term growth and earnings but have widened the deficit

It was hailed as a “historic victory” by President Donald Trump, and a “heist” by Democratic senator and possible presidential contender Elizabeth Warren. A year after the $1.5tn tax cut was passed into law, the economic effects are becoming apparent. 

The reductions have added octane to an already robust recovery, helping lift growth well above its trend rate and towards 3 per cent this year. 

The sustainability of that expansion is far less sure, however. The Federal Reserve has stuck with estimates of longer-run growth at just 1.8 per cent — no higher than before the package was passed — and business investment fell back sharply in the third quarter. 

What may prove long-lasting is the damage wrought by widening budget deficits. 

“We have had a big fiscal push — a big increase in spending, and a big increase in the deficit due to tax cuts,” said Alan Auerbach, an economics professor at University of California, Berkeley. Despite the current strength of the economy, the prognosis down the road was less encouraging. “We are on a very unstable fiscal path”. 

Investment 

Companies made bold promises after the tax cuts were pushed through Congress, pledging a total $194bn of investments, alongside wage boosts for around 2m employees and $7bn in one-off bonuses, according to analysis of 751 corporate announcements. Assuming the spending is spread over five years, the lift to growth over that period from those specific announcements is modest — amounting to a couple of tenths of a per cent, according to Dana Peterson of Citi, who compiled the data. 

At the same time, wage growth has shown greater buoyancy, advancing to 3.1 per cent according to the November jobs report. It is hard to establish how much of this is down to fiscal changes — the labour market has been getting progressively tighter for years. A durable acceleration in wage growth — which was predicted by Mr Trump’s economic advisers in advance of the tax cut — will rely in part on higher investment boosting US productivity. 

It is premature to judge the enduring impact of the corporate tax cut on investment, but early evidence is decidedly mixed. After a strong first quarter of the year, when it grew an annual pace of more than 11 per cent, annualised growth in business investment decelerated to a modest 2.5 per cent in the third quarter. Given the scale of America’s oil industry, falling oil prices could impose a further drag on corporate spending. 

Growth effects 

There is no doubting the short-term growth effects of the deficit-fuelled package. The estimates from Citi point to a 0.7 percentage point boost to growth in 2018 from tax cuts and this year’s big public spending package — a stimulus that will extend into next year. But unless Congress takes measures to avoid a “fiscal cliff”, lower public spending will drag down growth in 2020, at a time when higher interest rates could also restrain the economy. 

Analysis from Barclays argues that investment levels are still far too low to provide the kind of long-term lift in GDP growth that US Treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin has predicted. To boost growth to 3 per cent over a sustained period solely on the back of capital formation would require business investment to leap by 30 per cent, they estimate — dwarfing the growth seen to date. 

The Fed has left its estimates of longer-term growth unchanged at 1.8 per cent in the face of all the tax reforms, suggesting it is not counting on any long-term boost to the economy. 
The federal deficit 

Mr Mnuchin argued that the tax reforms would pay for themselves via higher growth, but there is no evidence of that heady claim in the data. Given the strength of the economy, it is highly abnormal to see a widening budget deficit, but that is what is happening. 
The deficit will this fiscal year hit $970bn, Congressional Budget Office projections show; that is 4.6 per cent of GDP, up from just under 4 per cent previously. Never in modern US history have deficits been this high outside a recession or war and its aftermath, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. 
If the tax cuts and spending increases are extended, public debt could rise from 78 per cent of GDP to 148 per cent by 2038, according to the CBO. The fiscal deterioration will start to drag on growth as private investment gets crowded out amid swelling government debt early in the next decade. 

Earnings and returns 

Cutting corporate America’s taxes predictably boosted its bottom line. Earnings in the S&P 500 had grown at 8.5 per cent in the quarter just before the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed, but leapt by 28.4 per cent in the same period of 2018. 
That, coupled with the repatriation of cash held overseas, gave boards a rare opportunity to pay off debt and bolster shareholder returns. Within six months, Moody’s calculated, 100 cash-rich companies repaid $72bn in debt and distributed $81bn to investors, cutting their collective cash hoard from $1.99tn to $1.8tn. 

An FT analysis showed that just five tech companies bought back $115bn of stock in the first three quarters of 2018. 

There was no such step-change in dividend payments, however, suggesting that boards remained wary of committing to more than a one-off increase in returns. And while the absolute sums spent on buybacks and dividends hit records, as a proportion of market value they have been higher in the recent past.
Market and corporate sentiment 

The cuts to corporate tax rates built on a growing economy and investor optimism about the Trump administration’s deregulatory instincts to bolster market sentiment at the start of 2018, but the rally that greeted the new tax legislation was short lived, ending by late January. 

US stocks picked up steam again as the strength of earnings and buyback spending became clear, but by the end of the year rising concerns about tariff battles had crowded out investors’ focus on the benefits of tax reform. 

The mood swings were visible from the Business Roundtable’s quarterly survey of CEO confidence. Its index of sales projections and hiring and investment plans jumped 21.8 points in the first quarter of the year to 118.6, its highest level since the survey began in 2002. Executives’ confidence peaked in February, however, with the index losing half of that gain by the fourth quarter. 
The drag from trade wars 

What changed the mood? In part, President Trump’s trade policy. In March, tariffs on imported steel and aluminium went into effect, delighting domestic steelmakers but leaving manufacturers of everything from washing machines to cars counting the cost. From June onwards, the administration ratcheted up penalties on a host of Chinese imports, prompting price rises and sweeping reviews of supply chains. 
Tariffs, said Josh Bolten of the Business Roundtable in December, had become a “headwind” countering the tailwind from lower corporate taxes. 

An FT analysis of earnings call and investor conference transcripts via Sentieo shows the change. In February, as companies came out with their first earnings reports after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted, tax reform dominated the discussion between analysts and executives like no other topic. By the summer, however, tax talk had given way to concern about tariffs and trade wars. 

>>> Fresenius looks to continue acquisitive stride in Brazil in coming year

Fresenius looks to continue acquisitive stride in Brazil in coming year

Fresenius [ETR:FME] will continue its acquisitive pace in Brazil next year, O Estado de São Paulo reported, without citing a source for the information.
The German provider of products and services for patients with kidney diseases made eight buys in Brazil this year, as part of its plan to invest BRL 300m (USD 76.7m) in the country until 2020, the Portuguese-language paper said.

>>> Philipp Plein receives preliminary offers

Philipp Plein receives preliminary offers

Switzerland-based fashion house Philipp Plein has received preliminary offers from a number of international private equity funds and fashion houses, Italian-language daily Il Sole 24 Ore reported. The report cited market rumours claiming that other offers are likely to be received in the next few days.
The report claimed that Philipp Plein is likely to sell a majority stake rather than a minority holding as previously thought.
The item added that the sale is expected to conclude in 1Q19 with the fashion house likely to be valued at around EUR 700m.
The article said that Philipp Plein closed 2017 with turnover of EUR 250m, a figure which is expected to grow by 15%-20% in 2018. The report said that the company's largest market is Russia which accounts for 10%-15% of turnover.

FT : Vinci buys majority stake in Gatwick airport for £2.9bn

Vinci buys majority stake in Gatwick airport for £2.9bn
French infrastructure group takes control of world’s busiest single-runway airport

French infrastructure group Vinci has bought a 50.01 per cent stake in the UK’s Gatwick airport for £2.9bn, the company has announced.

Gatwick is the UK’s second largest airport, with 46m passengers in the past year, and is the world’s busiest single-runway airport. It was disrupted in the run-up to Christmas by drone sightings which forced its closure for more than a day.

Each of the existing shareholders, which include private equity firm Global Infrastructure Partners and the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), sold down half of their stakes, leaving GIP with 21 per cent and ADIA with 7.9 per cent.

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System kept 6.4 per cent, the National Pension Service of Korea 6 per cent and the Future Fund Board of Guardians, Australia’s sovereign wealth fund, 8.6 per cent.

Vinci is one of the world’s largest construction groups and infrastructure operators, with activities ranging across toll roads, airports, energy and telecoms and other big civil engineering projects.

Gatwick’s chief executive, Stewart Wingate, who will stay in his job, said: “This is good news for the airport as it will mean both continuity but also further investment for passengers over the coming years to improve our services further.”

Nicolas Notebaert, chief executive of Vinci Concessions and president of Vinci Airports, said: “The whole Vinci Airports network will benefit from Gatwick airport’s world-class management and operational excellence.”

The parties expect the transaction to complete by mid-2019.

In the year to the end of March 2018, Gatwick reported revenue of £764m, with earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation of £411m.

(Business of Fashion) Acne Studios Takes Minority Investment

Acne Studios Takes Minority Investment
IDG Capital and Hong Kong-based I.T Group have acquired stakes of 30.1 percent and 10.9 percent of the company.

STOCKHOLM, Sweden — Acne Studios has sold minority stakes to China-focused investment firm IDG Capital and Hong Kong-based I.T Group, ending almost a year of speculation that the brand would be acquired by a larger rival.

Acne, one of the earliest and most successful purveyors of the "Scandinavian cool" style that has since become popular across fashion and design, had held talks with potential buyers as far back as 2013, from French luxury conglomerate Kering to private equity firms. Earlier this year, the company was working with Goldman Sachs on a possible sale, at a valuation of up to €500 million ($570 million).

Instead, IDG and I.T Group will acquire stakes of 30.1 percent and 10.9 percent respectively, from Öresund, Creades and PAN Capital, Acne said in a statement Sunday. Founder Jonny Johansson and executive chairman Mikael Schiller will remain majority shareholders in the business.

When Acne began shopping itself around earlier this year, the M&A market for fashion and luxury was booming, powered by perceived growth opportunities and increasing market complexity that made it harder and harder for sub-scale players to compete without greater access to the capital — and expertise — that sophisticated and deep-pocketed strategic or private equity investors can bring to the table. Over the course of 2018, Dries Van Noten sold a majority stake to Spanish luxury group Puig for an undisclosed sum, and Missoni sold a 41.2 percent stake to FSI Mid-Market Growth Equity Fund in transaction worth €70 million. Most recently, Michael Kors acquired Versace for $2.1 billion.

But in recent months, the temperature of the market has changed. The ongoing trade spat between the US and China has fuelled economic uncertainty and raised questions about the future of luxury demand. Shares of publicly traded luxury brands have plummeted.

The Stockholm-based label, founded in 1996, launched as a niche denim brand and has since built a strong modern contemporary-luxury name, well known for its upscale ready-to-wear and a distinct Scandinavian vibe that is popular with streetwear-attuned millennials. While the brand has yet to develop a strong leather goods offering, its sneakers are gaining traction. Last year, it generated $221 million in sales revenue with Ebitda, a measure of operating profit, of $35 million. It has over 50 own-brand stores in 13 countries.

However, sales growth slowed at the brand last year, rising just 9 percent, the slowest pace in at least a decade, according to a Goldman Sachs presentation to potential buyers reviewed by BoF. The brand still generates 43 percent of its sales through a network of 600 wholesalers, a potential point of vulnerability in a world where direct-to-consumer fashion is stealing market share from department stores.

Acne's two new investors are likely to give the brand a leg up in Asia, already a key source of growth (Asia drove one-quarter of Acne's sales last year, second only to Europe, according to the Goldman presentation). I.T Group has served as Acne's Asian retail partner since the early 2000s. IDG Group, which has also invested in Farfetch and Moncler, specialises in expansion opportunities in China and the rest of Asia (10 of the firm's 13 offices are based in the Asia region).

“Acne Studios will greatly benefit from their extensive know-how within fashion and the rapidly evolving universe of online and offline retail,” Schiller said in a statement.

* What's Acne Studios Worth?
The Swedish label is up for sale and market sources say it could fetch €400 million to €500 million — potentially more if there is competition.

FT : European bank stocks have worst year since eurozone crisis

European bank stocks have worst year since eurozone crisis
Collective 25% fall has cost shareholders $380bn and left all big banks trading below book value

European banks’ shares have had their worst year since the height of the eurozone crisis, with the sector falling 25 per cent, as investors lost faith in the region’s lenders amid enduring low profitability, outdated business models, negative rates and Brexit.

The slide has cost shareholders about $380bn and has left all major banks in the UK and across the continent trading below book value. On average they are now valued at about 0.6 times their net assets, compared with ratios of 1.1 for the top six US banks and 1 for lenders on the MSCI Emerging Asia Banks Index.

“The European bank sector is making more money than in recent years but continues to suffer from poor profitability relative to American or Asian peers,” said Ronit Ghose, chief banks analyst at Citigroup. “Share prices are down this year about three times more than earnings ‎forecast revisions.”

While profits and capital levels are up and regulatory fines down, any improvements in underlying performance have been eclipsed by new scandals, as well as geopolitical and macroeconomic shocks. Most notably, the election of a Eurosceptic, anti-establishment government in Italy over the summer heaped further doubt on the stability of the eurozone already shaken by Brexit.

Bankers, analysts and investors say sentiment has turned so sour there are few active buyers left, with the sell off almost indiscriminate across countries and business models.

Few economists now expect interest rates — perhaps the key determiner of bank earnings — will rise out of negative territory any time soon. There is still little clarity on the future relationship between the UK and the EU after Brexit, which has saddled banks with hundreds of millions in restructuring costs.

Relative to the US banking industry, expenses remain stubbornly high in Europe and are inhibiting the large scale investment needed to overhaul IT infrastructure. The average American bank makes a return on equity of 16 per cent whereas in Europe returns are about half that, according to Citi data.

“Investors are worried that higher profitability expectations are being pushed back due to concerns over the end of the US cycle, fears that ECB rate rises may be later or smaller and also ongoing shocks from technological change,” Mr Ghose said.

The most drastic fall has been at Deutsche Bank, which ends the year down 53 per cent after revenue continually disappointed expectations and it lost further market share in investment banking. The German lender fired its chief executive in the spring and last month was raided by police investigating money laundering.

Another scandal that dented sentiment was the emergence of large-scale money laundering at Danske Bank, whose shares fell 43 per cent after it was discovered €200bn of money from Russia and ex-Soviet states had been processed through its Estonian branch.