>>> Musings on Markets : A reminder that equities are risky, in case you forgot!

Musings on Markets


January 2019 Data Update 1: A reminder that equities are risky, in case you forgot!

Posted: 02 Jan 2019 06:10 PM PST

In bull markets, investors, both professional and amateur, often pay lip service to the notion of risk, but blithely ignore its relevance in both asset allocation and stock selection, convinced that every dip in stock prices is a buying opportunity, and soothed by bromides that stocks always win in the long term. It is therefore healthy, albeit painful, to be reminded that the risk in stocks is real, and that there is a reason why investors earn a premium for investing in equities, as opposed to safer investments, and that is the message that markets around the world delivered in the last quarter of 2018.

 

A Look Back at 2018

The stock market started 2018 on a roll, having posted nine consecutive up years, making the crisis of 2008 seem like a distant memory. True to form, stocks rose in January, led by the FAANG (Facebook, Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Google) stocks and momentum investors celebrated. The first wake up call of the year came in February, first as the market responded negatively to macroeconomic reports of higher inflation, and then as Facebook and Google stumbled from self-inflicted wounds. 

 

The market shook off its tech blues by the end of March and continued to rise through the summer, with the S&P 500 peaking for the year at 2931 on September 20, 2018.   For the many investors who were already counting their winnings for the year, the last quarter of 2018 was a shock, as volatility returned to the market with a vengeance. In October, the S&P 500 dropped by 6.94%, though it felt far worse because of the day-to-day and intraday price swings. In November, the S&P 500 was flat, but volatility continued unabated. In December, US equities finally succumbed to selling pressures, as a sharp selloff pushed stocks close to the "bear market" threshold, before recovering a little towards the end of the year.  

 

Over the course of the year, every major US equity index took a hit, but the variation across the indices was modest.

The ranking of returns, with the S&P 600 and the NASDAQ doing worse than the Dow or the SD&P 500 is what you would expect in any down market. With dividends incorporated, the return on the S&P 500 was -4.23%, the first down market in a decade, but only a modestly bad year by historical standards:

 

I know that this is small consolation, if you lost money last year, but looking at annual returns on stocks in the last 90 years, there have been twenty years with more negative returns. In short, it was a bad year for stocks, but it felt far worse for three reasons. First, after nine good years for the market, investors were lulled into a false sense of complacency about the capacity of stocks to keep delivering positive returns. Second,  the negative returns were all in the last quarter of the year, making the hit seem larger (from the highs of September 2018) and more immediate. Third,  the intraday and day-to-day volatility exacerbated the fear factor, and those investors who reacted by trading faced far larger losses.

 

The Equity Risk Premium

If you have been a reader of this blog, you know that my favorite device for disentangling the mysteries of the market is the implied equity risk premium, an estimate of the price that investors are demanding for the risk of investing in equities. I back this number out from the current market prices and expected future cash flows, an IRR for equities that is analogous to the yield to maturity on a bond:

 

As with any measure of the market, it requires estimates for the future (expected cash flows and growth rates), but it is not only forward looking and dynamic (changing as the market moves), but also surprisingly robust and comprehensive in its coverage of fundamentals. 

 

At the start of 2018, I estimated the equity risk premium, using the index at that point in time (2673.61), the 10-year treasury bond rate on that day (2.41%) and the growth rate that analysts were projecting for earnings for the index (7.09%). 

The equity risk premium on January 1, 2018 was 5.09%. As we moved through the year, I computed the equity risk premium at the start of each month, adjusting cash flows on a quarterly basis (which is about as frequently as S&P does it) and using the index level and ten-year T.Bond rate at the start of each month:

 

While the conventional wisdom about equity risk premiums is the they do not change much on a day to day basis in developed markets, that has not been true since 2008. In 2018, there were two periods, the first week of February and the month of October, where volatility peaked on an intraday basis, and I computed the ERP by day, during the first week of February, and all through October:

 

During October, for instance, the equity risk premium moved from 5.38% at the start of the month to 5.76% by the end of the month, with wide swings during the course of the month.

 

After a brutal December, where stocks dropped more than 9% partly on the recognition that global economic growth may slacken faster than expected, I recomputed the equity risk premium at the start of 2019:

 

The equity risk premium has increased to 5.96%, but a closer look at the differences between the inputs at the start and end of the year indicates how investor perspectives have shifted over the course of the year:

 

Going into 2019, investors are clearly less upbeat than they were in 2018 about future growth and more worried about future crises, but companies are continuing to return cash at a pace that exceeds expectations.

 

What now?

I know that you are looking for a bottom line here on whether the numbers are aligned for a good or a bad year for stocks, and I will disappoint you up front by admitting that I am a terrible market timer. As an intrinsic value investor, the only market-related question that I ask is whether I find the current price of risk (the implied ERP) to be an acceptable one; if it is too low for my tastes, I would shift away from stocks, and if it is too high, shift more into them. To gain perspective, I graphed the implied ERP from 1960 through 2018 below:

 

At its current level of 5.96%, the equity risk premium is in the top decile of historical numbers, exceeded only by the equity risk premiums in three other years, 1979, 2009 and 2011. Viewed purely on that basis, the equity market is more under valued than over valued right now.

 

I am fully aware of the dangers that lurk and how they could quickly change my assessment and they can show up in one or more of the inputs:

 

1.      Recession and lower growth: While there was almost no talk about a possible recession either globally or in the US, at the start of 2018, some analysts, albeit a minority, are raising the possibility that the economy would slow down enough to push it into recession, at the start of 2019. While the lower earnings growth used in the 2019 computation already incorporates some of this worry, a recession would make even the lower number optimistic. In the table below, I have estimated the effect on the equity risk premium of lower growth, and  note that even with a compounded growth rate of -3% a year for the next five years, the ERP stays above the historical average of 4.19%.

2.      Higher interest rates: The fear of the Fed has roiled markets for much of the last decade, and while it has played out as higher short term interest rates for the last two years, the ten-year bond rate, after a surge over 3% in 2018, is now back to 2.68%. There is the possibility that higher inflation and economic growth rate can push this number higher, but it is difficult to see how this would happen if recession fears pan out. In fact, as I noted in this post from earlier in the year, higher interest rates, if the trigger is higher real growth (and not higher inflation), could be a positive for stocks, not a negative.

3.      Pullback on cash flows: US companies have been returning huge amounts of cash in the form of stock buybacks and dividends. In 2018, for instance, dividends and buybacks amounted to 92% of aggregate earnings, higher than the 84.60% paid out, on average, between 2009 and 2018, but still lower than the numbers in excess of 100% posted in 2015 and 2016. Assuming that the payout will adjust over time to 85.07%, reflecting expected long term growth, lowers the ERP to 5.55%, still well above historical levels.

4.      Political and Economic Crises: The trade war and the Brexit mess will play out this year and each has the potential to scare markets enough to justify the higher ERP that we are observing. In addition, it goes without saying that there will be at least a crisis or two that are not on the radar right now that will hit markets, an unwanted side effect of globalization. 

 

Looking at how the equity risk premium will be affected by each of these variables, I think that the market has priced in already for shocks on at least two of these variables, in the form of lower growth and political/economic crises, and can withstand fairly significant bad news on the other two. 

 

Bottom Line

I have long argued that it is better to be transparently wrong than opaquely right, when making investment forecasts. In keeping with my own advice, I believe that stocks are more likely to go up in 2019, than down, given the information that I have now. That said, if I am wrong, it will be because I have under estimated how much economic growth will slow in the coming year and the magnitude of economic crises. Odds are that I will see the tell tale signs too late to protect myself fully against any resulting market corrections, but that is not my game anyway. 

 

YouTube Video

 

Datasets

1.      Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills - 1928 to 2018

2.      Historical Implied Equity Risk Premiums for US - 1960 to 2018

Spreadsheets

1.      Implied ERP for January 1, 2019

Data Updates for 2018

1.      January 2019 Data Update 1: A Reminder that Equities are risky, in case you forgot

2.      January 2019 Data Update 2: Fed Up? The Interest Rate Story

3.      January 2019 Data Update 3: A Big Picture Perspective 

4.      January 2019 Data Update 4: Currency Crisis, with a nod to the Cryptos!

5.      January 2019 Data Update 5: Country Risk - The 2019 version

6.      January 2019 Data Update 6: The Cost of Capital

7.      January 2019 Data Update 7: Corporate Investing- The Good, the Bad and the Indifferent 

8.      January 2019 Data Update 8: Debt and Taxes

9.      January 2019 Data Update 9: The Return of Cash (Dividends and Buybacks)

10.   January 2019 Data Update 10: The Pricing Game

 

 

 

 

 

>>> Chang'e 4 landing: China probe makes historic touchdown on far side of the m

Chang'e 4 landing: China probe makes historic touchdown on far side of the moon
Lander sends back first close-up shot of previously unexplored side of the moon
Play Video
1:13
China's Chang'e 4 probe lands on 'dark' side of the moon – video report
A Chinese spacecraft has become the first ever to land on the far side of the moon, according to state-run media, in a giant leap for human space exploration.
The China National Space Administration (CNSA) landed the robotic probe Chang’e 4 in the unexplored South Pole-Aitken basin, the largest, oldest, deepest, crater on the moon’s surface.
Early reports of a successful landing sparked confusion after state-run media China Daily and CGTN deleted tweets celebrating the mission. China Daily’s tweet said: ‘“China’s Chang’e 4 landed on the moon’s far side, inaugurating a new chapter in mankind’s lunar exploration history.”
Official confirmation of the landing came two hours later via state broadcaster CCTV, which said the lunar explorer had touched down at 10.26am (2.26am GMT). The Communist party-owned Global Times also said the probe had “successfully made the first-ever soft landing” on the far side of the moon.
An image tweeted by the English-language version of CCTV showed the first close-up shot of the far lunar surface.
The mission aims to take detailed measurements of the moon’s terrain and mineral composition. The Aitken basin is thought to have been formed during a gigantic collision very early in the moon’s history. The collision is likely to have thrown up material from the moon’s interior, meaning that Chang’e 4 could provide new clues as to how the natural satellite was formed.
The successful landing was touted as a “huge feather in China’s cap” by Malcolm Davis, senior analyst in defence strategy and capability at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
“There’s a lot of geopolitics or astropolitics about this, it’s not just a scientific mission, this is all about China’s rise as a superpower,” said Davis. “There’s a lot of enthusiasm for the space program in China. There’s a lot of nationalism in China, they see China’s role in space as a key part of their rise.”
The landing was greeted as “an impressive accomplishment” by Nasa administrator Jim Brindestine.
A spokesperson from the Australian Space Agency said the agency did not have a comment on the mission except to offer China its congratulations on the success of the landing and to “wish them all the best”.
Jim Bridenstine

✔@JimBridenstine

Congratulations to China’s Chang’e-4 team for what appears to be a successful landing on the far side of the Moon. This is a first for humanity and an impressive accomplishment!

1,011 people are talking about this


Davis said China’s successful landing could “set a fire under the Americans”, who may not like the idea that the next person to set foot on the moon may be a Chinese Taikonaut, as they are unofficially called.
“I imagine we will see an announcement the Chinese do intend to send Taikonauts to the moon by 2030,” said Davis.
Chang’e 4 entered an elliptical path around the moon at the weekend, drawing as close as 15km (9 miles) from the surface.
Spacecraft have taken pictures of the moon’s far side before, but no lander has ever touched down there. The move marks a step towards China’s ambition to become a leading power in space exploration alongside the US and Russia.
Pinterest
An artist’s impression of Chang’e-4’s lunar rover on the moon. Photograph: China National Space Administration/HANDOUT/EPA
Davis said China’s extraterrestrial ambitions seemed to be driven by multiple factors, including a desire for military dominance of space. Other motivations include the access to vast resource wealth provided by the moon and asteroids, in particular Helium-3 which is believed to exist in great abundance on the moon, and also that dominance of the region would be a sign of China’s growing power.
“China has been very clear in its understanding of this. They have compared the moon to the South China sea and Taiwan, and asteroids to the East China sea. They’re making a very clear geopolitical comparison with what’s happening with space and we need to pay attention to that.”

>>> Nice Matin receives offer from Iskandar Safa – report (translated)

Nice Matin receives offer from Iskandar Safa – report (translated)
03 JAN 2019
Businessman Iskandar Safa is understood to have submitted an offer for France-based regional newspaper Nice-Matin, French daily Le Figaro reported without revealing its source of information.
The report noted that Belgium-based conglomerate Nethys confirmed in a letter sent to employees that it was looking to sell its 34% stake in Nice Matin, whereas it had initially planned to increase its stake to a majority 51% shareholding on 1 January 2019. Nethys had acquired the stake in 2016, the report noted.
Meanwhile, French entrepreneur Bernard Tapie, who already controls the La Provence regional daily, denied in French daily Le Mondethat it was interested in acquiring Nice Matin, as previously rumoured.
Nice Matin reported losses of EUR 2m in 2017 and expects to break even in 2018. The report noted that the headquarters of the group are valued at EUR 30m.

>>> What to look at today - 3rd of January 2018

U.S. equity-index futures and suppliers to Apple Inc. tumbled after the iPhone maker added to global growth concerns with a cut in its sales outlook. Stocks in Asia were mixed, while there were wild moves in the currency markets as the yen surged.
Apple suppliers in South Korea and Taiwan paced declines after the company cut its first-quarter guidance for the first time in almost two decades, citing an unforeseen slowdown in China and fewer upgrades to iPhone models. Contracts on the Nasdaq led the drop for U.S. futures while European equities were also set to open lower. Japan’s currency jumped and the Australian dollar slumped to the lowest in almost 10 years as algorithmic programs amplified sharp gyrations amid thin liquidity during a Japanese holiday. West Texas oil again slipped under $46 a barrel as it reversed a rally on the back of Saudi Arabia trimming exports. Gold gained.



Macro :
- Google Shifted EU19.9b to Bermuda Through Netherlands in ’17: FD
- Pound Declines as Fears of Disorderly Brexit Trigger Stockpiling
- Equity Valuations Should Turn a Corner With Easier Fed Policy
- ‘ETFs as Asset Class’ Is Among the Top 2019 Trends in Markets

Keep an eye on :
- AFX LN : Alpha FX Group Sees FY Earnings Ahead of Market Expectations
- ASCL LN : Ascential Undervalued After Asset-Quality Improvement: Berenberg
- CRG IM : Consob Says Carige Shares, Bonds Suspended From Trading
- COST LN : Costain Sees FY Results in Line as Year-End Order Book Rises
- PBB GY : Dt. Pfandbriefbank May Face Margin Pressure as Metzler Cuts PT
- DNO NO : DNO Extends Cash Offer for Faroe Petroleum for Further 14 Days
- ENGI FP : Belgian Nuclear Reactor Utilization Was 50.5% in 2018: Le Soir
- FPM LN : DNO Expresses Concerns Over Faroe’s Report on Exploration Wells
- G IM : Generali Searches Acquisition Targets in Germany: Handelsblatt
- GNFT FP : Genfit, LabCorp Sign Pact for Nash Liver Disease Diagnostic Test
- GLJ GY : Grenke Full Year Leasing New Business Volume EU2.41 Bln
- HSX LN : FBI Probes Hacking of 9/11-Related Documents From Insurers: FT
- DIE BB : Belgian Dec. Car Registrations Drop 17%; D’Ieteren Share 19.1%
- NXT LN : *NEXT CUTS FY19 PRETAX GUIDANCE TO GBP723M FROM GBP727M
- EKT SM : Euskaltel Resumes Liquidity Contract With Norbolsa: Filing
- NXT LN : Next’s Christmas Performance ‘Reasonably Robust,’ MS Says
- NXT LN : Next Trims FY19 Pretax Profit Guidance to GBP723M From GBP727M
- RYA LN : Ryanair Traffic Up 12% to 10.3m Customers in December
- RYA LN : Ryanair to Meet With Spanish Unions Ahead of Planned Strikes
- TAP LN : Taptica Enters Prelim. Talks With Potential Acquisition Target
- UBSG SW : UBS’s Weber Says It’s Too Early to Merge With Another Bank: T-A
- VEC LN : Vectura Group Sees 2018 Ebitda ‘Materially Above’ Consensus
- DG FP : Vinci: Share Purchase Agreement for up to EU200M of Vinci Shares
- WIN GY : SecurCash Declared Bankrupt by The Hague District Court

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 3rd of January 2019

>>> Up
* Ascential Upgraded to Buy at Berenberg
* Games Workshop Upgraded to Buy at Peel Hunt; PT 35 Pounds

>>> Down
* Adecco Downgraded to Underperform at Credit Suisse; PT 40 Francs
* *APPLE PRICE TARGET CUT TO $211 VS $236 AT MORGAN STANLEY
* *APPLE PRICE TARGET CUT TO $187 VS $222 AT PIPER JAFFRAY
* *APPLE PRICE TARGET CUT TO $140 VS $182 AT GOLDMAN SACHS
* Randstad Downgraded to Neutral at Credit Suisse; PT 41 Euros
* SAF Holland Cut to Reduce at Kepler Cheuvreux; PT 9.50 Euros

>>> Initiation
* Asos Reinstated at Peel Hunt With Buy; PT 40 Pounds
* SFS Rated New Sell at Berenberg; PT 65 Francs

>>> Call