>>> US Research Calls I

Research Calls I
  • Upgrades
    • Accelerant (ARX) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Goldman, tgt $19.50
    • Affirm (AFRM) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Rothschild & Co Redburn, tgt $101
    • Axalta Coating (AXTA) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at Citigroup, tgt $34
    • Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at Keefe Bruyette, tgt $30
    • Blue Owl Technology Finance (OTF) upgraded to Overweight at Wells Fargo, tgt $15
    • Brinker (EAT) upgraded to Buy from Neutral at BofA Securities, tgt $192
    • Charles River (CRL) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at William Blair
    • Fidus Investment (FDUS) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at Keefe Bruyette, tgt $21.50
    • Ford (F) upgraded to Hold from Underperform at Jefferies, tgt $12
    • FS KKR Capital (FSK) upgraded to Equal Weight from Underweight at Wells Fargo, tgt $15
    • Intellia (NTLA) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at Citizens JMP, tgt $33
    • Kayne Anderson BDC (KBDC) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at Keefe Bruyette, tgt $16.50
    • Lennox (LII) upgraded to Equal Weight from Underweight at Wells Fargo, tgt $575
    • Micron (MU) upgraded to Overweight from Equal Weight at Morgan Stanley, tgt $220
    • Mobileye (MBLY) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Deutsche Bank, tgt $19
    • Morgan Stanley Direct Lending (MSDL) upgraded to Overweight at Wells Fargo, tgt $17
    • MSC Income Fund (MSIF) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at Keefe Bruyette, tgt $16.50
    • PennantPark Floating Rate (PFLT) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at Keefe Bruyette, tgt $10.50
    • TPG (TPG) upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JPMorgan, tgt $78
  • Downgrades
    • Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF) downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at JPMorgan, tgt $103
    • AT&T (T) downgraded to Sector Perform from Outperform at Scotiabank, tgt $30.25
    • Bath & Body Works (BBWI) downgraded to Neutral from Overweight at JPMorgan, tgt $26
    • Boston Beer (SAM) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup, tgt $235
    • Check Point (CHKP) downgraded to Sector Perform from Outperform at Scotiabank, tgt $205
    • Elastic (ESTC) downgraded to Sector Perform from Outperform at Scotiabank, tgt $90
    • Emerson (EMR) downgraded to Equal Weight from Overweight at Wells Fargo, tgt $140
    • Lithium Americas (LAC) downgraded to Underperform from Sector Perform at Scotiabank, tgt $5
    • OR Royalties (OR) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Jefferies, tgt $40
    • Papa John's (PZZA) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities, tgt $50
    • Portillo's (PTLO) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities, tgt $7
    • Rambus (RMBS) downgraded to Neutral from Positive at Susquehanna, tgt $100
    • Shake Shack (SHAK) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities, tgt $86
    • Sociedad Quimica y Minera (SQM) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Jefferies, tgt $50
    • Sweetgreen (SG) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities, tgt $9.50
  • Others
    • AvePoint (AVPT) initiated with a Buy at DBS Bank
    • Cassava Sciences (SAVA) initiated with a Buy at Lucid Capital, tgt $8
    • Charter (CHTR) resumed with a Buy at Citigroup, tgt $325
    • Commerce Bancshares (CBSH) initiated with an Outperform at Hovde Group, tgt $70
    • Figure (FIGR) initiated with a Buy at Goldman, tgt $42
    • Figure (FIGR) initiated with a Buy at Needham, tgt $51
    • Figure (FIGR) initiated with an Outperform at Keefe Bruyette, tgt $48.50
    • Figure (FIGR) initiated with an Outperform at Mizuho, tgt $47
    • Figure (FIGR) initiated with an Outperform at Bernstein, tgt $54
    • Figure (FIGR) initiated with an Overweight at Piper Sandler, tgt $50
    • Figure (FIGR) initiated with a Neutral at BofA Securities, tgt $41
    • Figure (FIGR) initiated with a Neutral at Autonomous, tgt $41
    • Figure (FIGR) initiated with a Hold at Jefferies, tgt $40
    • Invivyd (IVVD) initiated with an Overweight at Cantor Fitzgerald, tgt $10
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with a Buy at Goldman, tgt $55
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with a Buy at BofA Securities, tgt $51
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with a Buy at Deutsche Bank, tgt $48
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with a Buy at Citigroup, tgt $58
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with a Buy at UBS, tgt $48
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with an Outperform at Keefe Bruyette, tgt $52
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with an Outperform at Wolfe Research, tgt $50
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with an Outperform at Autonomous, tgt $51
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with an Overweight at JPMorgan, tgt $50
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with an Equal Weight at Morgan Stanley, tgt $43
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with a Neutral at Rothschild & Co Redburn, tgt $46
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with a Neutral at BNP Paribas Exane, tgt $46
    • Klarna (KLAR) initiated with a Market Perform at Bernstein, tgt $45
    • LB Pharmaceuticals (LBRX) initiated with an Outperform at Leerink, tgt $34
    • LB Pharmaceuticals (LBRX) initiated with an Overweight at Piper Sandler, tgt $78
    • LB Pharmaceuticals (LBRX) initiated with a Buy at Stifel, tgt $27
    • M&T Bank (MTB) assumed with an Overweight at Piper Sandler, tgt $225
    • Ondas (ONDS) initiated with a Buy at H.C. Wainwright, tgt $12
    • Skyward Specialty Insurance (SKWD) initiated with a Buy at Janney
    • TG Therapeutics (TGTX) assumed with a Buy at H.C. Wainwright, tgt $60

WWD : Chanel’s Bruno Pavlovsky on How Matthieu Blazy’s Arrival Is Reshaping the

Chanel’s Bruno Pavlovsky on How Matthieu Blazy’s Arrival Is Reshaping the House
The executive shared how the house is preparing for its new creative "spark" by restructuring its teams and naming new brand ambassadors.

PARIS — Matthieu Blazy’s first show for Chanel is one of the most eagerly awaited events in a year chock-full of designer debuts, fueling the sort of speculation usually associated with the release of a Taylor Swift album.

Observers searched for clues in the red carpet looks worn at the Venice Film Festival. (Chanel on Sunday named Ayo Edebiri, who attended the premiere of “After the Hunt” in a red strapless evening gown, as its new brand ambassador and said she would sit front row.)

Images of old Chanel collections circulated on Instagram, masquerading as an “exclusive preview” of Blazy’s spring 2026 collection.

In the run-up to the show at the Grand Palais on Monday, the brand began drip-feeding teaser images shot by veteran photographer David Bailey — the back of a model’s bobbed hair, and a white shirt with a garment cover — hinting at a minimalist new direction for the brand.

Ten days earlier, Bruno Pavlovsky, president of fashion and president of Chanel SAS, sat down with WWD in his Paris office to talk about the brand’s new chapter under Blazy, who succeeds Virginie Viard, the former right-hand of longtime creative director Karl Lagerfeld.

“The energy here is off the charts,” Pavlovsky beamed.

He addressed why the brand has spent more than a year showing collections designed by a studio team, how Blazy’s arrival is reshaping its organization, and why he hopes the new collection will prove the right kind of creative “spark.”

WWD: This has been an unusually protracted handover period, especially when you consider that some other houses have staged presentations within months of naming a new creative director. Why was that?

Bruno Pavlovsky: I really admire anyone who can join a house and put out a full collection in a matter of days or weeks. We take a longer-term approach. The most important thing was giving Matthieu time to truly settle into the brand. That’s also what sets us apart, so I believe we made the right decision and chose the right pace.

First, we wanted to give him the time he needed to really get to know Chanel. Not that he was unfamiliar with it — he is very cultured and has a deep knowledge of the history of fashion, whether at Chanel or elsewhere, so even before his arrival, I believe he spent a great deal of time on his own doing research and really figuring out what Chanel stands for. On top of that, we have adapted our set-up to make sure we can continue producing our 10 collections a year under the best possible conditions.

We’ve structured the workflow with Matthieu in a way that allows us to manage multiple collections simultaneously, giving him the space to step back and see the broader picture. In many ways, he’s like the conductor — orchestrating everything, ensuring that each element aligns, and that kind of process takes time.

His first haute couture collection is coming in January, and that will also mark the beginning of a new chapter. It will be the first collection with a team that is new to haute couture, which makes it especially interesting.

Then there are collections like Coco Beach and Coco Neige — more tactical in nature, but also offering space for distinct forms of expression.

Coco Beach is ready, and you will see a new narrative both in terms of product and imagery. This is Matthieu’s take on the Coco Beach concept, and it’s really fascinating. Of course, some people will love it, others may feel it leans too far in one direction or another. But for me, that’s not the point. What matters is that it’s a fresh start.

WWD: Your fall campaign also marks a departure, with full-page photos of shoes and bags featured as “hero” products.

B.P.: With this campaign, the intention was to put the focus back on the product and that’s something we intend to continue doing.

WWD: Did he have any input in this campaign?

B.P.: Of course, he was already here, and from the moment he arrived, we’ve run everything past him. But this campaign doesn’t represent his influence directly. Officially and practically, Matthieu’s imprint begins with the collection on Oct. 6.

WWD: His arrival comes against the backdrop of a generational handover on the management side, with the arrival in 2022 of Leena Nair as global chief executive officer of the brand. Why did you think the time was right for a new creative direction?

B.P.: For me, there are two interconnected but distinct aspects at play. First: the generational change in Chanel’s leadership, which was not only planned, but absolutely essential. It was necessary for us to lay the foundations for the next 20 years, and I believe we’re off to a strong start on that front.

Virginie did an extraordinary job handling the transition after Karl’s passing. She helped the brand evolve by bringing a greater sense of ease to the collections. It worked really well, but we also knew that, at some point, we would need to introduce a new creative eye to begin a new cycle and regain momentum.

I’m not sure that, in 15 years’ time, there will be many creative directors with the longevity of someone like Giorgio Armani, Ralph Lauren or Karl Lagerfeld. They are truly exceptional. Will this new generation of designers have the same staying power? One can only hope so, but inevitably, the questions of succession and creative renewal arise, and it just so happens that it’s happening everywhere all at once.

For us, this wasn’t the product of some strategic directive. Rather, it was about meeting the moment and it became clear at a certain point that a shift was needed. We’re genuinely thrilled to have Matthieu onboard. I have complete confidence in his vision and ability to take the house to the next level.

WWD: For almost four decades, the final fittings before the show were a sacred ritual, when Chanel welcomed chosen editors to preview the collection. For the first time this season, it won’t take place. How are the teams adapting to this new way of working?

B.P.: We no longer have those final fittings because everything is ready much earlier.

Karl had established a certain way of working — he taught us to pull it all together in just two afternoons. With Matthieu, it’s happening over eight days.

For the teams, I think it’s been a welcome change. In the past, there was often a bottleneck of information while we waited for those final two days and then everything had to come together very quickly. But now, with things being decided earlier and unfolding more gradually, the teams have had time to adapt.

We’re still fine-tuning things. Matthieu, his new team and our existing teams are working it out together. Some days, it all runs very smoothly, others, less so, but that’s entirely natural. I believe that in six months to a year, with two or three collections under our belt, we will have completely switched to this new way of working.

At the end of the day, what we care about is that Matthieu has everything he needs to deliver a collection and a show that truly reflect his vision. And there’s a dedicated team around him, working to ensure just that.

WWD: Has there been a lot of turnover in the design studio?

B.P.: There hasn’t been a huge amount of turnover, but we have significantly reinforced the teams.

We have assigned certain people to specific collections, while others work across all of them. This shift has required us to hire more people.

We’ve had to expand and adapt our development and technical teams too. They are now collaborating with the studio much earlier in the process, and that’s a win-win situation. In many cases, we’ve promoted people from within. Right now, we’re in a phase of ongoing discovery, learning and adaptation.

Witnessing this transformation has been absolutely fascinating from my perspective. And I want to be clear: this is not a critique of what came before. At that time, we were doing exactly what was needed. But this new approach will likely improve the speed of development, collaboration with suppliers and overall production timelines, because we’re starting earlier. Ultimately, I hope this leads to more reliable deliveries of certain collections in our boutiques.

WWD: Some houses undergoing a creative transition are also using that moment to introduce new muses and brand ambassadors. Are you?

B.P.: Yes, you will definitely see some new faces at this show, but you’ll also see ambassadors who have been with us for a long time.

Of course, Matthieu brings his own set of creative affinities, which are new and incredibly enriching, but not at the expense of existing relationships. On the contrary, it’s about adding depth and diversity to the panel of women who represent the brand. What matters to us is representing a broad spectrum of identities: different women, different cultures, different nationalities. It’s entirely legitimate that Matthieu should gravitate to a new set of people. He’s also very comfortable, I think, with our existing ambassadors. They’ve gotten to know each other and there’s a lot of goodwill.

That’s precisely why it was important to allow for a longer transition period: to preserve the identity of the house, even as we open up new horizons. We absolutely want Matthieu to put his stamp on the brand — to bring his energy, inspiration and personal vision. Naturally, that means change.

I hope the collection surprises people.

WWD: Even if that involves taking a risk?

B.P.: It might be a risk on paper, but we need this new energy and everything I’ve seen so far is pointing in the right direction. There hasn’t been a single moment where I’ve thought, “This isn’t right.” I find it deeply exciting to welcome new perspectives and interpretations. This is the first of many collections to come, so it will be a progressive evolution, but you need that initial spark.

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 6th of October 2025 V3(++)

>>> Up
* Epiroc Raised to Buy at Pareto Securities; PT 230 kronor
* Ford Raised to Hold at Jefferies; PT $12
* Galderma Raised to Buy at Bank Vontobel; PT 155 Swiss francs (+)
* Glencore PT raised from 350 to 425p at Jefferies
* Grab Holdings Raised to Add at CGS Int'l; PT $7
* Micron Raised to Overweight at Morgan Stanley; PT $220
* Mobileye Raised to Buy at Deutsche Bank; PT $19 (++)
* Nestle PT raised from 71 to 72 CHF, still Underweight, at Morgan Stanley
* Shield Therapeutics Raised to Buy at Stifel; PT 10 pence (+)
* Sonova Raised to Neutral at Rothschild & Co Redburn
* Stellantis Raised to Neutral at Mediobanca SpA; PT $11.37
* Orion Raised to Buy at Nordea; PT 75 euros
* UCB PT Raised to 285 euros from 250 euros at Deutsche Bank (+)

>>> Down
* Ashmore Cut to Underweight at Barclays; PT 150 pence
* Diagnostyka Cut to Hold at Wood & Company; PT 203 zloty
* Metso Cut to Hold at Handelsbanken; PT 12.50 euros (++)
* Papa John's Cut to Neutral at BofA (++)
* QinetiQ Cut to Hold at Kepler Cheuvreux; PT 530 pence (++)
* Sandvik Cut to Hold at Pareto Securities; PT 270 kronor
* SEB SA Cut to Neutral at CIC; PT 60 Kronor (++)
* Wartsila Cut to Hold at Nordea

>>> Initiation
* DBA Group Rated New Buy at Equita; PT 5.70 euros (+)
* Enagas Rated New Neutral at Citi; PT 12.80 euros
* FM Mattsson AB Rated New Buy at SB1 Markets; PT 65 kronor
* Securitas Rated New Buy at SB1 Markets; PT 165 kronor
* Sentia Rated New Buy at Pareto Securities; PT 80 kroner

>>> Call
* Momentum Chasing Grows, Positioning Not Stretched: Deutsche Bank (+)

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
Other news:
  • SKYE -62.2% (reports Topline CBeyond phase 2a data from nimacimab monotherapy and combination clinical trial)
  • DFLI -21.7% (prices offering of 20,000,000 shares of common stock at $1.25 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $25.0 mln)
  • QUBT -12.1% (prices offering of 37,183,937 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $750 million)
  • FITB -3.8% (Comerica to be acquired by Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) in all-stock transaction)
  • SYRE -1.8% (announces poster presentations at United European Gastroenterology Week (UEGW) 2025)
  • TIC -1.1% (announces $250 million private placement)
  • ORKA -0.8% (files for 39,425,806 share common stock offering by selling shareholders; files for $500 mln mixed securities shelf offering; also $200 mln common stock sales agreement with TD Securities as sales agent)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:
  • DVLT +9% (guidance)
Other news:
  • AMD +23.7% (Co and OpenAI announce a 6-gigawatt agreement to power OpenAI's next-gen AI infrastructure across multiple generations of AMD Instinct GPUs)
  • IVVD +14.7% (FDA has cleared the company's Investigational New Drug application and provided feedback to advance the company's REVOLUTION clinical program)
  • ABVX +12.8% (announces late-breaking presentation of 8-Week ABTECT induction trial results in participants with and without prior inadequate response to advanced therapies)
  • CMA +12.6% (Comerica to be acquired by Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) in all-stock transaction)
  • DGNX +9.9% (completes acquisition of Matter DK ApS, strengthening Diginex's AI-driven ESG data and analytics leadership)
  • FLY +9.8% (acquires SciTec to advance national security capabilities)
  • GLXY +8.8% (announces launch of GalaxyOne)
  • ARVN +5.1% (presents late breaking, Phase 1 Clinical Data for ARV-102)
  • NIU +4.6% (reports Q3 sales volumes of 465,873 units)
  • IMDX +4.2% (reports kidney transplant patient achieved ‘immune reset' with novel therapy and graftassure monitoring)
  • KLTR +3.3% (CFO to step down; reaffirms guidance)
  • LPA +3.2% (files for 5,041,598 ordinary share offering by selling shareholders)
  • SKYT +3.1% (files for $350 mln mixed securities shelf offering)
  • NAMM +3.1% (files for 1,750,000 ordinary share offering by selling shareholders)
  • BETR +3% (CFO Keven Ryan to retire)
  • UUUU +3% (closes upsized offering of 0.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031)
  • CRTO +2.8% (Criteo & DoorDash (DASH) sign multi-year partnership to expand retail media access)
  • SKE +2.6% (files prospectus supplement and entered into offering of 5.21 mln common shares at C$24.00 per common share)
  • PLTR +2.4% (OneMedNet selects Palantir to advance healthcare AI and data analytics)
  • TSLA +2.1% (teases event tomorrow in video on social media)
  • SATS +2% (DISH Research confirms addressable TV unlocks growth in a fragmented market)
  • CDNA +2% (announces new IVD products and IVDR certification for AlloSeq Tx and QTYPE at the 2025 American Society of Histocompatibility & Immunogenetics Annual Meeting)
  • ACDC +1.9% (files for 3,171,970 share common stock offering by selling shareholders, relates to convertible preferred stock)
  • FFAI +1.9% (Founder and Co-CEO YT Jia shares weekly investor update: FX Finalizes U.S. production assembly plan)
  • FCX +1.3% (issues update on PT Freeport Indonesia operations)

FT : Carlyle nears €7bn deal for BASF unit

Carlyle nears €7bn deal for BASF unit
Potential sale of coatings business to US investment group would be one of Germany’s largest transactions this year

BASF, the world’s largest chemicals group, is nearing a roughly €7bn deal to sell its coatings business to the US investment group Carlyle in one of Germany’s largest transactions this year.

Carlyle topped other private capital groups in an auction for the business unit and is now in exclusive talks with BASF, according to people familiar with the matter. The people cautioned that a deal had not been finalised.

A sale of the division would provide new funds for BASF, which has faced its worst crisis in years due to sharp increases in energy prices since Russia invaded Ukraine.

Last year the company slashed its dividend by a third. BASF stock has traded roughly flat this year but remains down significantly since the start of the war.

The BASF coatings business counts Germany’s struggling carmakers among its most important clients. The unit has more than 10,300 employees and generates €3.8bn in annual sales, according to its website.

European chemicals businesses have broadly struggled and are in a prolonged industry downturn, due to overcapacity, weaker than expected demand, and tough competition from Chinese rivals.

Groups including ExxonMobil and Saudi Arabia’s Sabic are considering exiting some of their European chemical operations, while earlier this year LyondellBasell sold four European plants.

Ludwigshafen-based BASF had been running an auction process for the coatings unit that drew interest from other private equity groups including KPS Capital Partners.

BASF last week closed the sale of its decorative paints unit in Brazil to Sherwin Williams for $1.15bn and said it was also eyeing up the sale of its feed enzymes business.

BASF also confirmed its intention to part with a minority stake in its agrochemicals division, as it continues to spin off or sell industry-specific business areas. The company said it aimed to have the agrichemicals division ready to be listed in 2027.

Carlyle has invested in other assets, notably acquiring the chemicals division of Dutch conglomerate AkzoNobel for €10.1bn in what remains Carlyle’s biggest European deal.

It has since renamed that business Nouryon and spun out salt and chemicals producer Nobian as a separate business in 2021.

BASF and Carlyle declined to comment.

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
  • Gapping up:
    • FLY +17.4%, ABVX +13.6%, ARVN +12.9%, DGNX +12.3%, CMA +9.3%, DVLT +6.7%, UUUU +5%, NEWP +4.8%, BETR +3.6%, LPA +3.2%, NIU +2.9%, SKE +2.8%, CRTO +2.8%, FFAI +2.6%, SKYT +2.4%, TSLA +2.4%, FCX +1.4%, BAK +1.2%, INCY +0.9%, DASH +0.8%, CWEN +0.8%
  • Gapping down:
    • QUBT -12%, FITB -4.3%, SYRE -1.8%, ORKA -0.8%, ATKR -0.7%, ABBV -0.5%

WSJ : Bill Ackman Says He’s ‘Uncancelable’

Bill Ackman Says He’s ‘Uncancelable’
The founder of Pershing Square Holdings opens up about his mistakes, his anti-DEI crusades and why he still hates to pay for parking

IT’S SAFE TO SAY Bill Ackman isn’t afraid of getting canceled. No matter how you view his posts about DEI, antisemitism or free speech—either as articulate counterpoints or as rambling, impolitic screeds—no one can deny that they’ve resonated far beyond his 1.8 million followers on X.

Being loud comes naturally to Ackman, the son of the commercial real estate broker Larry Ackman, who was known for being the outspoken parent at PTA meetings. Born in Manhattan, Bill grew up in Chappaqua, N.Y., in a $56,000 home that was a “stretch” for his father. Ackman credits his drive in part to his dad making it clear not to expect a penny’s inheritance from him.

When he was still in his 20s, Ackman launched Gotham Partners with $3.1 million in funds. He quickly pivoted to activist investing. As CEO of Pershing Square Capital Management, he’s seen some spectacular highs (the restructuring of mall operator General Growth Properties and Canadian Pacific Railway) and crushing lows (a hefty position in Valeant Pharmaceuticals cost him an estimated $4 billion when the stock plummeted). Of the losses, Ackman now says, “That would have been the end, but no f—king way was I going to let them liquidate me.”

Ackman has recently turned his megaphone to social issues, cementing his place among a brotocracy of the nation’s wealthiest men trying to dictate policy. He was Harvard’s most vociferous critic for its handling of pro-Palestinian student protests. Some saw his efforts contributing to the resignation of the university’s president, Claudine Gay, as laudable, while others found them deplorable. Asked why he’s the rare Wall Street executive to comment on polarizing issues, he says, “Everyone is afraid of losing business. If you don’t want to buy more stock, you know, don’t buy my stock. Who cares?”

Do you consider yourself self-made?

I got a big head start. If you are born to parents in New York’s Midtown, like me, instead of tough areas of the South Bronx, there’s a different outcome. I don’t know exactly how much personal credit I can take for that.

Tell me why you had an advantage.

I lived in a house that my dad paid $56,000 for in 1965, which was a big stretch for him. I went to a good school. We were comfortable. But there were things I could order on the menu, and certain things I wasn’t allowed to order. I never got the CB jacket I wanted or the Nike shoes. I never got an allowance. I had to work to have spending money.

Did you ever feel your parents were being too strict with you to make a point?

No, not at all. My father said very clearly to me that no matter how successful I am, “You’re not going to inherit any money from me. You’ve got to make it on your own.”

Besides family happiness, how do you judge success?

Based on the returns I generate for our investors. Warren Buffett had a 60-plus-year track record—my ambition is to best it. Our industry is a phenomenal industry, and we get paid extremely well if we do a good job. But I don’t see people ranking themselves on how much money. I’m not competitive, in a way.

It’s so interesting that you believe you’re not competitive with your peers.

At my stage of the game, what am I focused on? I’m focused on my success in my business; it’s based on my track record.

Say Dan Loeb or Carl Icahn, or another peer, does better for five years. That doesn’t rankle you?

It would only motivate me. It certainly wouldn’t rankle me. Good for them, you know, whatever.

I’m not sure I believe you. Do you think people see you as tougher than you are in real life?

How am I seen? Tell me.

For starters, you’re an activist investor, tough as hell, with an insane drive to beat others. Maybe to a pulp.

I told my dad that I was going to be a millionaire by 30, have $100 million by 40 and a billion by 50. I told him this when I was 18 or 19, and I was always ahead of my goals. I didn’t adjust for the inflation or the depreciation of the dollar, but I was always ahead. I was always optimistic, generally and about myself, and that carried me a long way.

Lots of people peak in high school. But when they get to real life, they’re not as quick on their feet or as talented as they think they are.

So I was lucky.

Is that hard work or luck? You went to Harvard with lots of smart people. What made you believe you had a comparative advantage? And what was your comparative advantage?

My comparative advantage is that the things I set myself to achieve as a kid, I achieved, and that built confidence that I could do the next thing I set myself to achieve. That’s it. Simple.

Some people make a lot of money and love to spend it. Others, like Warren Buffett, are not interested in “balling out,” as my kids say. Do you look down on huge planes and boats and Beyoncé birthday parties?

I’m not judgey. To each his own.

Are you neurotic about your own money?

No.

You sure? I also don’t believe that.

All right—I don’t like wasting money.

I knew it was something.

If I don’t like the price of the garage, I’ll go to a different one. It’s funny. I don’t like paying for parking, and I used to own a parking company. Or it really upsets me if the gas grill was running over the weekend—which it was, and it pissed me off. I really don’t like wasting money. I wouldn’t call it a neurosis, but it’s something that I care about.

I find most of those things are patterned in childhood.

Dad was very big on not wasting things. If I left my light on in my room, he’d get really upset. Now I go around the house turning off every light.

How do you talk about money with your kids?

I’m still working on that.

I’m for setting a good example. Kids do what you do, not what you say. I’m for being realistic and not hypocritical. I think it’s confusing for kids who grow up a certain way, and their parents are like, “You can’t have a cappuccino.”

I totally understand that. If you’re in a position to help, I think the best thing you can do for your kids is create the opportunity to pursue the thing they’re most passionate about. If they want to be a teacher, you don’t want them to be an investment banker just so that they can afford to live in New York City. If you have the ability to help them with an apartment so they can be a teacher and still live a nice life, that’s a wonderful thing a parent can do for a child, and I don’t think it poisons them.

Tell me about your biggest bump in the road.

I wrote this white paper questioning the AAA rating of a company called MBIA, and they went after me very aggressively. I found myself in a really bad place, under investigation by [Eliot] Spitzer, the New York AG, and then the SEC. And some guy on crutches comes over and says, “Ackman, what the f— is going on?” It’s Ian Cumming, the chairman of Leucadia National. He goes, “I told you this s— was going to hit the fan. But, look, we really believe in you. You’ll get through this, and when you’re ready, we’re going to back you in a significant way.”

It doesn’t sound like luck to me. Sounds like life and grit.

Success comes from how you deal with failures. I dealt with that failure well, and I launched Pershing Square in January 2004. My investment was $4 million. And I had to borrow a million against my house, OK? In 2004 I probably had $10 million net worth, plus an apartment. I wasn’t worth that much.

Comparatively speaking you weren’t worth that much. How many times are you up from that now?

A lot. A lot.

What’s a lot?

A thousand times. When I was 50, I brought the whole firm together and I said, “Look, we don’t have to raise money anymore. We’re out of the hedge-fund business. We have what Buffett had.” I looked it up: When Buffett was 50, Berkshire had $400 million of capital, and our public vehicle had $3.9 billion. We have a vehicle 10 times as large—not adjusted for inflation, but still.

What was the scariest moment of the past few decades?

The only scary moment was the day my new girlfriend, Neri Oxman, called me and said, “Brad Pitt is at the [MIT] lab visiting our students.” Neri and I usually text and talk all day, but with Brad Pitt there, it’s like radio silence from 10 in the morning to 10 at night; she doesn’t respond. I say to myself, “OK, I’m going to lose this woman. Brad’s going to steal my girlfriend, and then I’ll get wiped out.” So you tell me, how much did luck play a role? A lot.

I’m still not convinced it was luck.

My father always said to me, “Bill, in life, you have to keep your antennae up. Opportunities present themselves. You’ve got to take advantage of them.”

I’m curious about the psychology of people who make it to the tippy top. CEOs are often energized from some deep interior place. Was there anything sad in your childhood?

No.

Why are you so driven then? You wanted to please your parents? What do you credit it to?

I didn’t like that my parents could decide stuff for me. I wanted to do whatever I wanted, say whatever I wanted. I’m very motivated to speak freely. That’s why I’m so active on Twitter.

Have you ever felt concerned about your image?

I hate it when people have an inaccurate perception of who I am.

What’s the most annoying instance of that? Generally speaking.

Something about private-jet, hedge-fund guy.

You do have a private jet, and you’ve been a hedge-fund guy for years. How much money are you giving away—or what percentage are you planning to give away?

A substantial majority.

Giving effectively can be difficult. How are you going to do it?

I don’t know exactly. I’ve given away over $900 million. My other foundation still has almost a billion dollars. I’m going to come up with a thoughtful way to distribute the resources.


OK, let’s talk about the Twitter madness, because sometimes it is pure madness. Explain what you are doing.

I’m doing what I was motivated to do from the time I was a kid: I wanted to be able to say what I thought. One of my best friends said, “Bill, you know, the way you should live your life is pretend you’re dead. Your best friend gets up at your funeral. What do you want them to say?” You should work your life in reverse, right? I figured out I’m going to die. I want a significant life. I want to have the greatest beneficent impact on the largest number of people.

Isn’t giving your money away going to have the greatest beneficent impact on the most people?

I thought originally, business was about making money, philanthropy was about doing good, and that’s how I was going to save the world. I fairly quickly concluded that business actually can do enormous good—way more good than any nonprofit. In fact, many nonprofits are a complete disaster, the governance structure, everything’s terrible. Philanthropy should be saved for capital market failures, where there isn’t a for-profit answer, something no venture capital will back.

Give me examples on how philanthropy can do things businesses can’t.

They can fund early-stage scientific research. You can solve poverty in Africa with philanthropy, or reduce hunger. But the other way you can have an impact is having a voice.

Some people would say your voice is loud, but they don’t believe it’s made the world better.

Well, they should look at all the various issues I’ve taken on. Look at the Pornhub people: I got them to take down 85 percent of videos that were nonconsensual, or under 18, sexual abuse. We achieved that in part by shaming Visa, MasterCard. That’s a very powerful thing. So I like Twitter.

You’re political on Twitter.

Look, I helped Trump get elected. I was a very “out there” voice supporting him. Not everyone, including some people in my family and some friends, agrees with me on Trump.

Have you ever pulled down a Twitter post?

Sure.

Because it embarrassed you or someone pointed out something false?

The latter. I learned something that caused me to realize I was wrong, but not often. My whole Twitter history is up there, pretty much, except for a couple.

Do you even get embarrassed?

No, because I’m not afraid to admit my mistakes, which in my business is really important. I do it very publicly, which very few people do in my industry.

Are you cocky?

I don’t think so. When I was a kid, people thought I was cocky, but I was just confident.

What’s the difference?

Cocky is being very confident with no basis for it, or an inadequate basis. Confidence is when you believe in yourself because you’ve proven you can do what you say you’re going to do.

Let’s talk about the demonstrations at Harvard. You were the most vocal alum. Do you wish you’d done anything differently?

Nope. I wish Harvard had opened the kimono and listened. From the very beginning, Claudine Gay never responded to my letters. I wanted the opportunity to meet with the board, but I wasn’t given that. That’s why I ended up going public. That was the catalyst. They were afraid of me because I had a Twitter account.

You’ve been outspoken about antisemitism, anti-DEI and pro–free speech. Why do you feel you need to comment on everything? Your peers are so cautious.

Why do people not speak up? They’re afraid of getting canceled, afraid of being accused of being a racist, of losing business. One of the most important things I’ve been willing to do is speak what I believe to be the truth, regardless of what other people think. That’s one of the benefits of being independent financially. I’m unafraid. Yeah, if you don’t want to buy more stock, you know, don’t buy the stock. Who cares?

Have you ever been canceled by a group?

No. I’m uncancelable.