>>> US Gapping up


Gapping up
In reaction to strong earnings/guidance
:

  • BCRX +1.6%

M&A news:

  • NITE +67.1% (o be acquired by Biogen (BIIB) for $25.50/share in cash)

Select biotech related names showing strength:

  • RKDA +26.2%, SGMO +10.4%, PGNX +5.1%, TRVN +3.7%

Select Chinese stocks trading higher:

  • KNDI +3.2%, VIPS +3%, BZUN +2.4%, MOMO +2.4%, CTRP +2.2%, WB +2.2%, SOHU +1.7%, JD +1.7%, BABA +1.6%, NTES +1.2%, BIDU +1.2%

Other news:

  • ASND +60.2% (announces positive top-line results from phase 3 heiGHt Trial)
  • AVXL +9.2% (publication by independent scientific group of new preclinical data for ANAVEX2-73)
  • ODP +9.6% (Co and Alibaba.com (BABA) announced a strategic collaboration)
  • ATNX +7.5% (presents results from two Phase III studies of KX2-391 ointment in the treatment of actinic keratosis)
  • CSII +7% (to join S&P SmallCap 600)
  • SLDB +6.2% (positive Barrons article)
  • RGNX +5.9% (positive Barrons article)
  • WRE +5.7% (to join S&P SmallCap 600)
  • XON +4.3% (announces a strategic licensing agreement with Surterra Wellness 'to utilize Intrexon's Botticelli)
  • VYGR +2.4% (positive Barrons article)
  • NKTR +2.3% (presents preliminary immune activation, safety and clinical activity data from the ongoing dose-escalation stage of the REVEAL Study)
  • QURE +2.1% (positive Barrons article)
  • TSLA +1.2% (CEO Elon Musk tweets Model Y event will be March 14)
  • TEVA +1% (announces U.S. launch of authorized generic of Flector Patch) . 

Analyst comments:

  • ON +2.5% (upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at BMO Capital Markets)
  • KHC +2% (upgraded to Equal-Weight from Underweight at Morgan Stanley)
  • IMMU +1.8% (initiated with a Buy at H.C. Wainwright)
  • HAS +1.7% (upgraded to Market Perform from Underperform at BMO Capital Markets)
  • FL +1.1% (upgraded to Buy from Hold at Pivotal Research Group)

>>> US Early premarket gappers


Early premarket gappers

Gapping up:

  • RKDA +23.4%, TRVN +9.6%, PGNX +5.1%, CHK +3.5%, KNDI +3.2%, DDD +2.6%, SGMO +2.5%, KGC +2.2%, CTRP +2.2%, GRPN +2.1%, VIPS +2.1%, BZUN +2%, MOMO +2%, FRO +1.8%, HTZ +1.8%, SOHU +1.7%, WB +1.6%, WFT +1.6%, JD +1.5%, CS +1.5%, BCS +1.4%, TGT +1.4%, PSO +1.3%, BABA +1.3%, NTES +1.2%, HPQ +1%, FOXA +1%, BIDU +0.9%

Gapping down:

  • VALE -4.8%, FMS -2.7%, GFI -2%, AU -2%, NVO -1.5%, DDS -1.4%, GOLD -1.3%, FCX -0.9%, TEAM -0.9%, SAN -0.8%, ABB -0.8%, NVS -0.8%

The Verge : Trump’s 2020 reelection campaign wants to push for government contro

Trump’s 2020 reelection campaign wants to push for government control of 5G networks
A strategy that is unlikely to gain much support

Politico reports that President Donald Trump’s 2020 reelection campaign wants to advocate for governmental control of 5G wireless airwaves, which would in turn lease access to private wireless providers.

The campaign says that the plan is designed to “drive down costs and provide access” to rural, “underserved” parts of the country with faster internet access, according to the campaign’s national press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany. On its face, the thinking behind the strategy appears similar to a plan that was leaked in 2018, which suggested that the federal government providing its own infrastructure that would in turn be used by wireless carriers. That plan earned plenty of backlash from the telecom industry and FCC chairman Ajit Pai, and the Trump Administration quickly walked the memo back, saying that it had no plans to build its own infrastructure.

As my colleague Russell Brandom wrote last year, the idea of a national telecom is appealing, because it could bring connectivity to rural areas — like my home state of Vermont — and provide some competition for private carriers. But, simply rolling out 5G infrastructure isn’t the silver bullet that will fix the issues that those underserved parts of the country faces, especially given the respective track records of companies like AT&T and Verizon (not to mention the state of US politics and the upkeep of its own infrastructure.)

THE PLAN IS LESS ABOUT RURAL ACCESS, AND MORE ABOUT COUNTERING CHINA
That’s also if you take the campaign’s word that the plan is designed to bring wireless access to rural America, which isn’t really the case. The goal behind last year’s memo was designed to counter China’s growing dominance in the 5G space, something that the Trump administration has spoken about recently. Trump advisor Newt Gingrich recently penned an op-ed in Newsweek (via Politico) in which he made the argument that a public-private partnership would be a moonshot-type project that would head off Chinese dominance. The administration has also considered barring American companies from using equipment from Chinese companies, and has pressured European allies to avoid deploying it as well, citing potential security risks. Indeed, Trump himself has tweeted about the issue, saying that the US should deploy 5G (even 6G) infrastructure “as soon as possible,” to keep the US from lagging behind China.

Politico notes that the campaign’s plan likely isn’t going to get much traction from the wireless industry, which have already begun slowly rolling out their own 5G networks. It pointed to a blog post from wireless trade association CTIA, which argues that the country shouldn’t try to “out-China China” and that a free-market approach will prevail. Even the author of the 2018 memo, former National Security Council senior director for strategic planning Robert Spalding, doesn’t think that it’s a practical plan, saying that the military would have to share the airwaves with the public. “I know that DoD has no interest in using any kind of department resources in making this a priority.”

TheVerge : Tesla Model Y SUV will be unveiled March 14th

Tesla Model Y SUV will be unveiled March 14th

And the third version of Tesla’s Supercharger will debut this week

Image: Tesla
Tesla will unveil its Model Y crossover SUV on March 14th during an event at the company’s design studio in Los Angeles, CEO Elon Musk announced Sunday. The new electric car will be Tesla’s fifth since the company was founded in 2003.
The Model Y will share about 75 percent of its parts with the Model 3, which is currently Tesla’s most affordable car. Musk said the Model Y will be about 10 percent bigger, cost about 10 percent more, and will have slightly less range than the Model 3. The Model Y won’t have the “Falcon Wing” doors that are found on Tesla’s bigger SUV, the Model X. (Musk had previously hinted that it might.)

More details on specs and pricing will be revealed at the event, according to Musk, and Tesla will offer test rides, meaning the company likely has a few pre-production prototypes already finished. Musk also said on Sunday that Tesla will unveil its electric pickup truck “later this year.”
Tesla will build the Model Y at the company’s Gigafactory outside Reno, Nevada, and the vehicle is supposed to enter volume production in 2020. Tesla also eventually plans to make Model Ys at the Gigafactory it’s building in Shanghai, China.
Musk’s announcement comes just three days after Tesla finally made the long-promised $35,000 Model 3 available to purchase. The company also announced last week that it is transitioning to an online-only sales model going forward, is closing “many” of its stores around the world, and is laying off an undisclosed number of workers.
Tesla has only shown one teaser image of the Model Y to this point: a simple black-and-white silhouette. But the company’s been talking about the car for years. In 2015, Musk tweeted the name of the Model Y before quickly deleting the tweet. He also went back and forth on whether the compact SUV would be built on the same technological platform as the Model 3, before ultimately deciding to share technology between the cars in order to be able to bring the Model Y to market on time. Musk said Tesla signed off on the final design late last year.
Musk had previously joked that the Model Y would be unveiled on March 15th “because the Ides of March sounded good.” A few Chinese media outlets had speculated earlier this month that Tesla might wait to reveal the car at April’s Shanghai Auto Show.
Musk also tweeted Sunday that the third version of its “Supercharger” electric car charging stations will be revealed this coming week. The first public station will go live at 8PM PT on Wednesday, March 6th, though he didn’t reveal the location.
Version 3 of Tesla’s Supercharger is supposed to be able to charge cars at a rate of 350kW or more, according to previous tweets from Musk. That would help the company keep pace with some budding competition in the space. Porsche has said it will build 350kW chargers for its much-anticipated lineup of electric sports cars, and Volkswagen has already begun building a network of charging stations under the Electrify America brand that can charge between 150kW and 350kW. Tesla’s current Superchargers have a max rate of 145kW, and its cars can only accept up to 120kW.

NYT : With Big Stars and Plans, Luminary Aims to Be the Netflix of Podcasts

With Big Stars and Plans, Luminary Aims to Be the Netflix of Podcasts

LOS ANGELES — Patti LuPone as a bebop-singing junkie nun in John Cameron Mitchell’s musical follow-up to “Hedwig and the Angry Inch.” A new show from Lena Dunham called “The C-Word.” Series from Conan O’Brien, Malcolm Gladwell and Trevor Noah.

It sounds like the latest programming blitz from Netflix. But this lineup — more than 40 exclusive shows, all without ads — has nothing to do with video. The offerings come from a podcast start-up called Luminary that has emerged from stealth mode to unveil nearly $100 million in funding and a subscription-based business model that it hopes will push the medium into a new phase of growth.

“We want to become synonymous with podcasting in the same way Netflix has become synonymous with streaming,” Matt Sacks, Luminary’s co-founder and chief executive, said in an interview. “I know how ambitious that sounds. We think it can be done, and some of the top creators in the space agree.”

Mr. Sacks, 28, was referring to Guy Raz, known for “How I Built This” and other hit podcasts; Leon Neyfakh, the “Slow Burn” creator and host; and Adam Davidson, a force behind “Planet Money,” the award-winning NPR podcast. All three men have signed on with Luminary for their next shows, which will roll out exclusively on the company’s app in the coming months.

Mr. Raz is working on “Wisdom From the Top,” focused on business and political leaders. Mr. Neyfakh will contribute “Fiasco,” an investigative show that delves into governmental imbroglios. And Mr. Davidson has created “Passion Economy,” a podcast about people who experience strokes of genius, like an Amish farmer with no electricity who makes his business skyrocket with the use of an iPhone.

Most podcasts are free, but the Luminary app — set to arrive by June — will focus on subscriptions. For $8 a month, subscribers will gain access to Luminary’s ad-free lineup. For creators, Luminary is offering large upfront payment guarantees in exchange for exclusive rights to distribute their work, reducing the risk of a concept and, hopefully, encouraging greater creativity and higher production values. Luminary will also pay creators bonuses if their shows reach certain listening thresholds.

“For podcasting to grow, creators must be able to take risks on more conceptual ideas, and the Luminary model provides that comfort,” Mr. Davidson said.

Most podcast creators make money by selling ads. Podcasts are expected to generate $514 million in ad sales this year, a sum projected to rise to $659 million in 2020, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau and PwC.

As with radio or broadcast television, which are also reliant on ad sales, reaching the biggest audience possible is the goal. As a result, the same kinds of mass-appeal podcasts tend to get made. That means news shows, sports commentary and lots of chat.

Editors’ Picks
The Meaning of the Scene: Sean Spicer Repents
There Are No Five Stages of Grief
‘S.N.L.’ Cold Open Skewers Michael Cohen Hearings With Stiller and Hader
Making a living by advertising, as many podcasters have discovered (like YouTube stars before them), is harder than it looks. The scramble is constant. An advertiser could pour in money one month and vanish the next. With podcasting in particular, it is difficult to measure how many people listen to the ads. More podcast apps offer ad-skipping buttons.

The Luminary app will not be totally absent of ads. It will also offer a free area, where listeners can play any of the estimated 600,000 ad-supported and nonexclusive podcasts in the market.

“Matt has figured out a smart and sustainable way to push the business forward — better discovery for listeners, allowing creators to focus on creating the highest-quality content possible and stop worrying about selling ads,” Liza Landsman, a partner at New Enterprise Associates, a venture capital firm that has invested in Luminary, said of Mr. Sacks.

Luminary has 70 employees in New York and Chicago, about 40 of whom are engineers. The company is beginning a marketing campaign on Monday that includes outdoor advertising in New York, Los Angeles and Austin, Tex.

To some degree, of course, all media start-ups think they are going to be the next Netflix. The test for Luminary will come in the execution. And there are plenty of challenges. Subscription-based businesses are hot at the moment, but analysts say that consumers will begin pushing back and asking, How many entertainment services do I really need to be paying for every month?

Luminary is also entering an increasingly crowded field.

Apple devices have long dominated the podcast market, despite what analysts describe as a largely ambivalent approach; Apple has improved its podcasting app over the years, but it has never felt like a priority. That could change now that Google has reintroduced a podcast player and music streaming services like Spotify are looking to podcasting for growth.

Last month, Spotify paid a reported $230 million for Gimlet Media, a producer of audio dramas like “Homecoming” and “Crimetown.” Spotify also offers free listening with ads and a premium version for subscribers who pay a $10 monthly fee. And Spotify offers some exclusive podcast shows from stars like Amy Schumer and the rapper Joe Budden.

Subscribe to With Interest
Catch up and prep for the week ahead with this newsletter of the most important business insights, delivered Sundays.

SIGN UP
Other podcast platforms include Stitcher, Pocket Casts, Overcast and Castbox. Among start-ups, Himalaya Media, a San Francisco start-up backed by the Chinese audio giant Ximalaya FM, announced last month that it had raised $100 million and would introduce a podcast-distribution app with exclusive shows and a feature that would allow listeners to leave gratuities. Its stated goal? “To climb to the peak of the global podcast space.”

Mr. Sacks brushed off the competition.

“Just like in the premium television space, there is more than enough room for multiple offerings to thrive,” he said.

“What sets Luminary apart,” he continued, “is our exclusive content right off the bat. Nobody comes close.”

In addition to new shows from people like Ms. Dunham, whose “C-Word” podcast will offer a weekly look at women who have been deemed “crazy” online, Luminary will serve as the new exclusive home for a half-dozen established podcasts. Those include “Under the Skin,” hosted by the British comedian Russell Brand; a popular sex-focused show with an unprintable name created by Corinne Fisher and Krystyna Hutchinson; and Nick van der Kolk’s eclectic interview program “Love and Radio.”

Still, the project that probably best demonstrates where Luminary would like to go is Mr. Mitchell’s new musical.

“Hedwig,” the story of an East German transgender rocker, made its debut Off Broadway in 1998 and became a cultural phenomenon. Mr. Mitchell’s new show, “Anthem: Homunculus,” written with Bryan Weller, is not a sequel, although it contains material that was originally intended for one. The musical is set in a small town and finds Mr. Mitchell’s character battling a brain tumor and running out of insurance. He stages an audio-telethon to raise money for his treatment.

In addition to Ms. LuPone, the cast includes six Tony Award winners, including Glenn Close, who wails a punk song while ostensibly nailed to a cross. Produced by Topic Studios, the company behind the hit podcast “Missing Richard Simmons,” the musical includes 31 original songs and will unspool over 10 episodes, stretching roughly six hours in total.

“I’m very interested in pushing podcasts to a cinematic level of storytelling,” Mr. Mitchell said. “We had other suitors for this project, but none had the imagination of Luminary. Matt understood what I wanted to do immediately.” Also drawing Mr. Mitchell’s attention: Luminary intends to aggressively market individual podcasts to make them feel more like events.

Mr. Sacks grew up in Chicago and studied history at the University of Pennsylvania. When he was a junior, he teamed up with friends to create Splash.FM, a now-defunct social network focused on music discovery.

After a brief stint at Goldman Sachs post-graduation, Mr. Sacks went to work at New Enterprise Associates. In early 2017, he found himself scrounging for smart podcasting investments on behalf of the firm. But he couldn’t find any he really liked.

“Nobody was focusing on content discovery to the degree that I wanted as a consumer: the right person finding the right show at the right time,” he said. “So I decided to build my own.”

(Nikkei) Activist investors set their sights on Asia

Activist investors set their sights on Asia
Number of targeted companies up 20% with Japan at the forefront

TOKYO -- The number of activist campaigns in Asia surged nearly 20% last year, putting the region second only to the U.S. in terms of activist investor activity.

A record 111 companies headquartered in Asia faced requests from activist shareholders to improve corporate governance last year, according to the report "Activist Investing Annual Review 2019," produced by consultancy Activist Insight in association with Schulte Roth & Zabel.

This is the first time Asia has overtaken Europe (excluding the U.K.) in terms of number of companies targeted. It is also the fifth consecutive increase for the region and a threefold increase from 2013, when there were 37 activist campaigns.

Most of the targeted companies were Japanese, with 47 subjected to activist demands -- a jump of over 40% compared to a year ago. The uptick in activism follows reforms designed to improve shareholder engagement, as well as corporate governance.

It has been four years since the government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe adopted Japan's corporate governance code. The code was revised last year to encourage transparency, with companies compelled to disclose information on topics such as policies for reducing cross-shareholdings. More recently, the Financial Services Agency has been moving to require disclosure on how executive compensation is determined.

"American activists have been studying markets like the U.K., Germany, and Japan for some time," the report said, predicting that if the U.S. market experiences high valuations, "they are now ready to deploy capital" in those non-U.S. regions.

Of the 111 companies in Asia, 22 were in China (including Hong Kong) accounting for 20% of the total, while South Korea and Singapore accounted for 10% each, with 11 companies respectively. A few companies from India, Taiwan and Malaysia also attracted interest.

Globally, 922 companies were publicly targeted, with the U.S.accounting for more than 50% of the total. In Europe, the number of campaigns fell 17% to just 101 companies targeted.
U.S. activist hedge fund Elliott Management was among the most active last year, with public campaigns against 24 companies across the globe. In Asia, it acquired shares in Japanese manufacturer Alpine Electronics and its acquirer, Apple parts supplier Alps Electric. The hedge fund also called for improved shareholder returns at South Korea's Hyundai Motor Group, as well as a review of businesses.

Shirou Terashita, CEO and president of IR Japan Holdings, predicts that the number of Asian companies targeted by activists will continue to increase. The onslaught will come from big funds like Oasis Management and Effissimo Capital Management, as well as "new activist funds that are popping up around the world," he said. Ele Klein of Schulte Roth & Zabel also stated in the report that "there are startups that are just concentrating on individual areas like Asian-dedicated activists and you are going to see more of that."

Activist campaigns targeting company boards are gaining momentum. In Japan, 31% of activist demands involved board issues. Overall, activists gained 56 board seats in Asia last year and this number is expected to grow.

Companies are beginning to respond to this increased pressure, experts said, and this could prompt more activism in Asia. For example, Japanese medical equipment and camera maker Olympus recently proposed giving U.S. activist ValueAct Capital a seat on its board. "This was a positive surprise for a lot of people and will surely prompt more activists to enter Japan or other Asian nations," Terashita said.

(Nikkei) JD.com loses ground as growth shifts to China's smaller cities

JD.com loses ground as growth shifts to China's smaller cities
E-retailer hurt by weak rural service, joins Alibaba in seeking new revenues

SHANGHAI -- JD.com, China's second-largest e-commerce platform, is losing domestic market share to leader Alibaba Group Holding and emerging players -- especially in regional cities, the key to growth in the country's maturing market.

The Tencent Holdings-backed company posted a net loss of 2.4 billion yuan ($358 million) for 2018, larger than the 150 million yuan in red ink amassed the prior year. JD.com's user base expanded about 4% last year to around 300 million people, a sharp slowdown from 29% growth in 2017.

"We have been developing regional cities over the last few years, but we must offer more products to attract more customers," JD.com CEO Richard Liu said during an earnings call Thursday.

Liu's words betray the source of JD.com's troubles. As e-commerce matures in China's major metropolitan areas, the driver of growth is shifting to regional cities and farming villages -- areas where JD.com lags Alibaba.

JD.com is known for quick and punctual deliveries thanks to its in-house distribution system. The e-retailer also sells many of its own products directly to shoppers in a business model resembling that of Amazon.com. The company gained favor among consumers for its reliable service compared with No. 1 Alibaba, whose delivery quality varies because it entrusts shipping to cooperating companies.

But Alibaba has begun to remedy this situation. Chairman Jack Ma said last year that the company will invest 100 billion yuan in its logistics network and consider additional funding if needed. The e-retailer also is expanding partnerships with delivery services.

By contrast, JD.com's insistence on self-sufficiency can harm its reputation for superior service due to a lack of distribution centers in regional areas.

JD.com accounted for 25% of China's e-commerce transactions by value in first half of 2018, down about 7 percentage points compared with all of 2017, according to the Electronic Commerce Research Center. Alibaba's market share rose 2 points to roughly 55%.

Emerging competitors nip at JD.com's heels. Electronics retailer Suning.com and Pinduoduo, a platform known for low prices, have expanded their market shares.

"I use Alibaba often. I also use Pinduoduo, which is cheap, to buy daily goods like toilet paper," said a 34-year-old office worker living in the Jiangxi Province city of Yichun. He rarely uses JD.com, saying it "is more expensive and has a narrow selection of products."

Governance issues add to the struggles at JD.com's core business. The Lunar New Year spirit was spoiled last month when the company said it would lay off 10% of senior executives based on their performance this year. The move was the result of changes to management behind the scenes.

Liu entered the e-commerce market in 2004 and developed JD.com into a model for China's private sector. But his arrest in the U.S. last year on sexual assault allegations damaged the company's image and led to a temporary plunge in its stock price. No charges were filed.

After his release, Liu transferred authority over core segments such as online sales and distribution to other managers. But the shift to a decentralized system from one built on his leadership has left JD.com "without someone to take the reins and organize important internal strategies," said a source inside the company, which has yet to unveil an effective plan for revamping its online sales business.

JD.com seeks a solution by supplying other companies with the logistics and unmanned supermarket technology it developed in China -- a new source of income that would reduce its dependence on e-commerce. In February, the company teamed with Japanese peer Rakuten on delivery robots.

Growth in China's online sales market softened to 25% last year from 39% in 2017 for a total of 9.65 trillion yuan, according to China's National Bureau of Statistics. Even Alibaba senses the slowdown, investing in Suning.com and fostering cloud services to reduce its reliance on e-commerce. Tencent also took a stake in Pinduoduo as the Chinese technology giants intensify their rivalry.

Chinese online retailers have gone overseas and are investing in a variety of potential cash cows as they try to overcome their dependence on domestic e-commerce, but none of those projects has become profitable.

WSJ : A Storm Is Gathering Over Container Shipping

A Storm Is Gathering Over Container Shipping
Sagging global trade, rising fuel costs and stubbornly low freight rates have shipping lines facing new headwinds in an elusive search for stability

It used to be that you could measure confidence in the container-shipping industry by the ever-increasing scale of the carriers’ vessels and the size of their ship orders.

These days, the hulking megaships that serve the world’s biggest trade routes look more than ever like monuments to brash corporate planning and projections built out of hopes rather than reality.

From slowing global trade to rising fuel prices to capacity increasingly out of step with demand, container-shipping operators are facing new challenges over the next two years, hurting prospects for a recovery after nearly a decade of moving in fits and starts toward stability.

Shipments of boxes stuffed with clothing, electronics, manufacturing parts and a broad range of consumer goods across the oceans are the backbone of global trade. But the cost of moving them could go up sharply as regulations calling for cleaner—and more expensive—ship fuels kick in next year.
Estimates are that shipping companies will try to pass on to cargo owners about $10 billion a year in combined additional expenses from the new fuel requirements, but they will almost certainly have to absorb some of those costs to keep customers on board.

Container ships move things as diverse as clothes, food, furniture, electronics and heavy-industry parts. In the years before the 2008 financial crisis, boxships fueled globalization. Demand for ocean trade rose as much as 8% annually and owners spent billions to buy more vessels.

This created loads of excess tonnage that, at the current rate of new ship deliveries, will take at least two years to absorb. It also means that on top of higher fuel expenses, freight rates likely will continue to hover way below break-even levels across some of the biggest ocean trade routes.

With China’s economy slowing and shipments taking a hit from the evolving trade war between Washington and Beijing, operators are already cutting their full-year forecasts.

“We see clearly a global economic growth that is declining,” Soren Skou, chief executive of A.P. Moller-Maersk AS, the world’s top container operator by capacity, told an investor conference call recently. “We see weaknesses, in particular, in China and Europe. We expect container demand growth to fall to 1% to 3% this year from 3.7% to 3.8% last year.”

Copenhagen-based Maersk said 2019 will be subject to considerable uncertainties because of the risks of further restrictions on global trade. It added that a new regulation by the International Maritime Organization to cut sulfur emissions from ship stacks “will bring significant increases in fuel prices.”

Industry experts expect the IMO rule, which goes into effect at the beginning of next year, to boost ship fuel costs by about one-third.
Equities analyst David Kerstens of Jefferies LLC in a report last week trimmed the investment bank’s target for Maersk shares, in part based on the carrier’s wary outlook for the year. The firm expects Maersk to recover its $2 billion in added fuel costs, but “irrational behavior with price competition remains the key risk factor and could potentially trigger the fourth wave of sector consolidation and a shakeout among some of the smaller loss-making and financially distressed Asian carriers.”

“The fuel price increase is very significant and there will be a premium in freight rates,” Jeremy Nixon, CEO of Japan’s Ocean Network Express, told The Wall Street Journal in a recent interview. “We are trying to pass on the fuel charge to customers, but we are not doing it very effectively.”

The operators are at a critical point of the year on shipping prices, with talks on annual freight contracts now under way with their biggest customers, including Walmart Inc., Home Depot Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and Target Corp.

Consulting firm AlixPartners LLP said in a report last week that ships on the main Asia-to-Europe trade route would need to boost freight rates by 40%, and 33% for trans-Pacific trades.

Shipping executives say uncertainty over the availability of cleaner fuels makes price estimates this year little more than a guessing game. “It has turned the shipping market, the transportation market, into a casino,” said Andreas Hadjiyiannis, president of the Cyprus Union of Shipowners.

The continuing standoff between the U.S. and China caused shipping volumes to rise sharply in the second half of 2018 as companies pulled orders forward to get ahead of tariffs. With threats of additional tariffs set aside for now, estimating orders and shipping volumes this year is a guessing game.

“We don’t believe a China-U.S. deal will be the last we have heard of trade tensions in 2019,” said Mr. Skou. “There is also clearly an outstanding discussion between Europe and the U.S.”

A persistent imbalance between shipping supply and demand only adds to the uncertainty.

London-based Braemar ACM Shipbroking Services PLC estimates demand for container shipping will rise between 2% and 3% annually over the next four years, while fleets are expected to expand at a 5% annual rate. About one-third of the new tonnage will be ultralarge container vessels that move as many as 22,000 boxes.

Maersk introduced those behemoths in 2013 and other carriers quickly followed, deploying dozens of the vessels on Asia-to-Europe routes. The idea was that billions could be saved by stacking scores of boxes on a single ship rather than on a number on smaller ships.

The carriers are struggling to keep the ships full to make up for the big capital outlays, however, and the effort is crashing against supply chains. Shipping lines are cutting weekly services to get as many boxes as possible on each ship, which means fewer port calls and delays in deliveries that leave customers angry.

“It’s the A380 superjumbo,’” said Lars Jensen, CEO of SeaIntelligence Consulting in Copenhagen. “It only works in specific corridors, otherwise it’s too big.”

Airbus SE is now winding down its disappointing A380 jet program. But the world’s container-shipping lines are stuck with their megaships and only a big rebound in global trade will turn around their business.

WSJ : Investors Scale Back Inflation Bets, Signaling Doubts About Growth



From: LAURENT CHEKROUN (MAKOR SECURITIES LO) At: 03/03/19 20:43:32
Subject: WSJ : Investors Scale Back Inflation Bets, Signaling Doubts About Growth
Investors Scale Back Inflation Bets, Signaling Doubts About Growth
A widely tracked measure of inflation expectations is mired below 2% even in a tight U.S. job market

Bets on a pickup in inflation are falling out of favor, underscoring investors’ skepticism that the U.S. economy will be able to turn stronger after a soft start to the year.

The growth outlook has dimmed over the past year as measures of manufacturing activity, consumer spending and business confidence have waned. The cool-down in the economy helped keep inflation from running past the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for a seventh straight year in 2018.

The fact that inflation has continued to undershoot targets has allowed the Fed to suggest it will pause its rate-increase campaign, helping the S&P 500 rise 12% in 2019 and notch its best two-month start to the year in decades. But many bond investors have taken a more pessimistic view, questioning whether muted price increases are another sign that prospects for the economy and earnings are dimming.

Investors will get another look at where inflation is headed on Friday, when the Labor Department publishes its monthly jobs report.

“I’m in the camp of those who are doubtful,” said Zhiwei Ren, managing director and portfolio manager at Penn Mutual Asset Management.

Mr. Ren said he bought Treasury inflation-protected securities in 2017 but wound down purchases last year and believes he won’t buy much, if any, this year. TIPS offer yields—albeit relatively small ones—that rise together with inflation, making them most desirable to investors when they believe prices across the economy are heading higher.

“I thought 2017 would be a good year because that’s the year we all talked about synchronized global growth,” Mr. Ren said. “But we didn’t see [inflation], and now, all the data shows a slowdown.”

A widely tracked measure of investors’ expectations for average annual inflation over the next decade, known as the 10-year break-even rate, has remained below the Fed’s 2% target in 2019. Measured by the gap between yields on the 10-year Treasury note and 10-year TIPS, the break-even rate was at 1.95% on Thursday. That is up from recent lows in December but still below the four-year high of 2.18% hit in May, according to FactSet.

Demand for other products that hedge portfolios against inflation has also waned in recent months. The Schwab U.S. TIPS exchange-traded fund is on track to post a quarterly outflow for the first time since 2013, according to Lipper.

And surveys show investors are growing increasingly doubtful that the economy will heat up. Among global fund managers surveyed by Bank of America in February, 55% expected below-trend growth and inflation over the next year, the highest share since December 2016.

Few—including Mr. Ren—believe that the U.S. is on the brink of recession. The unemployment rate remains near multidecade lows. For 100 consecutive months, the labor market has added more jobs than it has lost. Wages have risen at least 3% on a year-over-year basis for six straight months, and data Thursday showed gross domestic product rose more than expected in the final quarter of 2018. In the past, these factors—especially low unemployment—would have prompted investors to fret about inflation.

Yet a tight labor market hasn’t been enough to keep inflation running consistently at the Fed’s 2% target. That has stirred debate among economists about whether factors like the diminishing power of unions and globalization have created an environment in which inflation is likely to stay muted.

One factor that could change the picture: the Fed.

In recent months, Fed officials have begun publicly discussing potential changes to how they define their inflation target. One approach would have the Fed aim for an average of 2% inflation over several years, meaning it would deliberately seek modest overshoots of the 2% target during good times to make up for falling below target during recessions. The Fed would want slightly higher inflation to reduce the risk of deflation in a slowdown and to give investors and consumers confidence that growth would continue. Officials have said they won’t make any changes before early next year.

“These are incredibly dovish concepts, a complete change in the response function of the Fed,” said Matt Toms, chief investment officer of fixed income at Voya Investment Management. “It’s suggesting the Fed won’t immediately respond to kill inflation.”

Traders have begun pricing in a small chance of the Fed lowering short-term interest rates this year, a move that could help nudge inflation higher by lowering the cost for businesses and households to borrow and invest. Federal-funds futures, which track market-based expectations for monetary policy, showed Wednesday a 20% chance of the Fed lowering rates by year-end, according to CME Group. That compares with around 4.1% at the start of the year.

So far, though, there are few signs of investors positioning for an uptick in growth and a corresponding boost to inflation.

The 10-year Treasury yield, used as a reference rate for everything from mortgages to auto loans, has drifted along in a relatively narrow range this year after reaching multiyear highs above 3% in 2018. The 10-year yield tends to rise when investors are confident about growth and retreat when they are less sure about the economic outlook. Yields rise as bond prices fall.

Mutual funds and exchange-traded funds tracking equities have also logged steep outflows, while those offering investors exposure to bonds are posting net inflows so far in 2019, according to a Bank of America analysis of EPFR Global data.

That pattern suggests that investors aren’t convinced that the economy is about to heat up. Inflation tends to make Treasurys less attractive to investors, since it chips away at the purchasing power of their fixed payouts.

“The Fed can do everything they try to do to increase inflation expectations, but the market is doubtful they can achieve that,” Mr. Ren said.

FT : PE managers turn to rivals to fund exit of founding partners

PE managers turn to rivals to fund exit of founding partners
Chart of the week: buyout groups also need capital for acquisitions and tech investments

A rising number of private equity managers have sold minority equity stakes to other PE firms to raise capital to support acquisitions, expand into new areas and fund technology investments.

This trend has accelerated because of the emergence of players dedicated to buying portfolios of minority stakes including Dyal Capital, Blackstone’s Strategic Capital Holdings, Goldman Sachs’ Petershill unit and AlpInvest Partners. This group together has raised more than $17bn to pursue deals since 2012 and is seeking to raise $14bn more, according to Bain, the consultancy.


“The need to manage generational change often is not the publicly stated reason since firms are careful to avoid the appearance that they are cashing out the team responsible for historical performance,” said Hugh MacArthur, head of Bain’s PE practice.

“The truth is that a growing number of firms face the challenge of succession planning as founding partners approach retirement.”

Dyal, a division of Neuberger Berman, has been particularly active, acquiring stakes in 40 private equity and hedge fund managers including American Securities, Golub Capital, Clearlake, Sound Point and Starwood.

The acquirers gain access to the income stream from management and performance fees but are also betting that their partners will be able to raise substantial assets.

Terms of these transactions are rarely disclosed but some observers believe acquirers are overpaying, given the deteriorating outlook for returns, as a result of the intense competition among PE managers for deals. Selling an equity minority stake also dilutes the profit pot for existing partners, increasing the risk that top talent could leave.

Buyers, said Mr MacArthur, were putting “enormous faith” in private equity managers' ability to maintain performance, underlining the need for thorough due diligence and care in structuring any deal.