FT :Telecoms chiefs back overhaul of EU competition policy

Telecoms chiefs back overhaul of EU competition policy
Sector throws weight behind European Commission plan to create industrial champions

The telecoms sector has thrown its weight behind the new European Commission’s plan to create industrial champions and overhaul its approach to competition policy.

A letter signed by the chief executives of some of Europe’s largest telecoms companies states that they would support the move to provide Europe with an “industrial policy for digital leadership” which could provide a boost for the struggling sector in its battle with giant US technology companies.

The move is a signal of support for the political priorities set out by Ursula von der Leyen, the new president of the European Commission, and Thierry Breton, the former France Télécom chief executive who has been appointed as commissioner for the internal market.

The letter will be published ahead of a meeting in Brussels on Monday between Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s antitrust chief who now oversees EU digital policy in addition to her competition responsibilities, and powerful telecoms figures including Tim Höttges, chief executive of Deutsche Telekom, and Stéphane Richard, head of Orange.

Ms Vestager has proved a divisive figure in the telecoms sector having blocked mergers in Denmark and the UK which slowed the consolidation of the European market. The review of competition policy and a focus on a new industrial strategy, however, could open the door to a different approach.

The heads of the telecoms companies said they wanted to work with the commission to “turn ambition into reality”.

“This requires a stable and sustainable regulatory environment at home, but also fair and balanced rules for competing with global players,” the letter said. It also called for the commission to “actively address the fragmented European telecom market” by encouraging companies to build more national and cross-border scale in telecom infrastructure.

The letter was signed by the chief executives of Deutsche Telekom, Orange, BT, KPN, Telecom Italia, Telefónica and eight smaller incumbent telecoms companies that form the European Telecoms Network Operators (ETNO) grouping. Nick Read, chief executive of Vodafone, and Mike Fries, chief executive of Liberty Global, also signed the letter in a rare sign of co-operation between incumbents and large challenger telecoms companies.

The letter will be published to coincide with the annual FT-ETNO summit in Brussels.

Stephen Howard, head of telecoms research at HSBC, said the debate around whether Europe’s competition policy was fit for purpose was driven by “the ghost of Alstom-Siemens”, the Franco-German industrial deal blocked by Ms Vestager in February.

Mr Breton has indicated that competition policies need to adapt as European companies battle with huge rivals in the US and China.

Mr Howard said those comments should sound encouraging for telecoms companies looking to better compete with global technology companies that have been constrained by the previous European approach to consolidation.

FT : UK insurers forecast to post losses as costs and claims rise

UK insurers forecast to post losses as costs and claims rise
Sector is already under pressure in wake of regulatory probe into pricing

The UK’s insurers are set for a tough 2020 as price rises for home and motor cover fail to keep pace with the rising cost of paying claims.

According to new forecasts from consultancy EY, both the home and motor insurance industries are set to make underwriting losses next year. That will put more pressure on the sector, which is already dealing with a regulatory probe into the way it prices policies.

“Pricing is not keeping up with the rate of inflation,” said Tony Sault, UK general insurance leader at EY, adding “there is a lot for the industry to contend with”.

EY forecasts that the combined ratio — a measure of claims and costs as a proportion of premium income — will worsen to 107 per cent for motor insurance and 102 per cent for home insurance next year. Anything over 100 per cent suggests that the industry will be lossmaking.

The industry is already struggling with its profitability. Last year was the worst year in home insurance for eight years. This year’s motor insurance results are expected to be much worse than 2018.


Both parts of the industry are struggling with rising claims costs.

Home insurance is dealing with a growing number of claims for leaks. “There is a combination of factors, such as poor construction quality, colder winters which freeze the pipes, more plumbed appliances in the house and increased unoccupancy,” said Mr Sault, adding that building materials are also getting more expensive.

This year insurers will also have to pay out for the floods that hit many parts of the country this autumn. According to the Association of British Insurers, the industry will pay out more than £100m to cover the costs of flooding in Yorkshire and the Midlands.

Motor insurers, meanwhile, are dealing with higher payouts to cover serious injuries following a government ruling earlier this year. Changes to the system for compensating whiplash injuries are also coming in, too. There has also been a broader increase in repair costs. Today’s cars, which are packed with technology, are more expensive to fix.

“What was a £150 job a few years ago is now a £700-£800 job,” said Mr Sault.

Meanwhile, data from the ABI show that prices for motor insurance have been flat over the past year while home insurance prices have risen by just 2.6 per cent.

The Financial Conduct Authority has promised to take action to stop the industry from charging loyal customers much more than new ones.

That, says EY’s Ben Wilson, is already having an impact on prices.

Share prices in listed insurance companies have already started reacting to the gloomy outlook. Since January, shares in Admiral, Direct Line and Hastings have all underperformed the FTSE All-Share.

FT : GEDI media group considers Agnelli approach

GEDI media group considers Agnelli approach
Exor in talks to buy 43% of newsprint business from De Benedetti family

John Elkann, chairman of Fiat Chrysler and scion of Italy’s billionaire Agnelli industrial dynasty, is ready to buy a controlling share of Italy’s leading printed media group, adding it to his ownership of The Economist.

CIR, owner of the holding company behind Italian media group GEDI, is considering an offer from Agnelli investment vehicle Exor to buy its stake in the company behind national newspaper La Repubblica, it said in a statement published late on Friday. CIR will consider the approach at a board meeting on Monday.

A deal could see Exor buy 43 per cent of GEDI from the De Benedetti family. Exor already owns 6 per cent of GEDI, which was created in 2016 after a merger of Turin-based newspaper La Stampa, long owned by the Agnelli family, with the De Benedetti media assets into a single group.

If the De Benedetti dynasty agrees to the sale of their controlling stake, Exor would be forced to bid for the outstanding shares with the aim of taking the group private, according to a person briefed on the discussions. GEDI was worth slightly less than €145m at Friday’s market close.

The move underlines a new dynamism in Mr Elkann’s diversification of his family investment portfolio. He is already in talks to merge Fiat Chrysler, Exor’s biggest investment, with French carmaker Peugeot and the deal is expected to conclude in the next few weeks.

In a meeting with investors last week in Turin, Mr Elkann made clear he was open to Exor making more acquisitions, highlighting the luxury goods industry as one area of interest. He underlined Exor’s interest in providing permanent, long-term capital and support companies in finding management succession.

Media ownership was a passion of his grandfather Gianni Agnelli and Mr Elkann took control of The Economist in 2015. Mr Elkann remains enthusiastic about the potential of news media, in contrast to many.

His move to take control of GEDI comes after a family feud among the De Benedetti dynasty broke into the open in October pitting patriarch Carlo De Benedetti against his sons Rodolfo and Marco De Benedetti.

Mr De Benedetti made a bid to buy back a stake in the group he had handed over to his offspring and accused his sons of mismanagement. His offer was rejected but the public bust-up has caused frictions in the newsroom and across the company.

FT : A grand bargain for Europe might yet be possible

A grand bargain for Europe might yet be possible
Security and climate change will be high on Ursula von der Leyen’s list of priorities

Ahead of the start of the Nato summit in London on Tuesday, the Europeans are as divided as ever.

Emmanuel Macron, the French president, shattered unity among European leaders with a letter to Vladimir Putin, offering the president of Russia talks on land-based cruise missiles. His veto of EU accession talks with Northern Macedonia and Albania still resonates in European chancelleries.

As a result, Franco-German relations have entered one of their periodic
crises.

At the same time, France is the only EU country with a serious commitment to international security, post-Brexit. The 13 French soldiers who died in a helicopter crash in Mali last week are a reminder that we still live in a world in which France sends troops and Germany sends cheques.

The problems between Paris and Berlin are to some extent transitional. With Mr Macron, France entered a new era of politics, while German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her grand coalition are entering their final moments. At the weekend the Social Democrats, the junior coalition partner, elected two politicians of the hard left as joint leaders. The decision has made early elections more likely. The SPD is the party of coal. They also oppose higher defence spending. In the snake-pit of grand-coalition politics, Ms Merkel has had to sacrifice the two big multilateral targets she agreed to this decade: the Paris climate goals on carbon emissions; and the Nato defence spending targets of 2 per cent of gross domestic product by 2024.

Yet last week, she reiterated her support for the 2 per cent Nato target, with a delayed date of 2030. At present, however, this has no chance of being agreed.

This is all about post-grand coalition politics. The current arrangement is due to expire by 2021. It might be succeeded by an alliance between the conservative CDU-CSU and the Greens. The Greens are not enthusiastic about higher defence spending either, but they might be persuaded to invest in a European defence capacity if the long-term prize was reduced dependence on the US. If the CDU/CSU accepted Green environmental policies in turn, conservative and green Germany would strike a grand bargain.

The politician pushing hardest for a rethink on defence policy in Germany is Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, CDU leader and defence minister. Her language on European defence is different from that of Mr Macron. But as Ulrike Franke, a German defence policy specialist, has noted, the two leaders are surprisingly aligned in their substantive proposals on the future of European defence. Germany has a stronger commitment to Nato than France. But even the French know that the alliance remains indispensable.

Likewise, it is also clear that Nato cannot be the exclusive pillar of European security forever. The EU will need to share a greater burden. Ms Kramp-Karrenbauer is showing some gumption by championing a cause that, for now, is unpopular in Germany. A vehicle for further integration could be the Macron-inspired European intervention initiative, a forum in which several European countries hope to co-ordinate joint military action.

Security and climate will be high up on the list of priorities for the new European Commission. One of the big projects for Ursula von der Leyen, the new commission president, will be the conference on the future of Europe, which is due to start next year. Its goal is to make recommendations for new policies and institutional changes.

A grand bargain on climate change and security would also indirectly involve the eurozone and its institutions. There is pressure on the European Central Bank to focus asset purchases on green bonds. Zaki Laïdi, a professor of international relations at Sciences Po in Paris, suggested that the EU could harden its soft-power tools, which include the euro, trade and competition policy. Leveraging existing tools is likely to be more effective than creating new ones. But the trouble is that the EU has in the past lacked the political will to use the instruments it has.

A strategy to weaponise the single currency would require deep changes to the eurozone’s governance structure, a eurozone budget and a mutualised safe asset among them. There is no majority for such measures right now, but these instruments perhaps look more attractive if the alternative consists of increases in conventional defence spending. The solution to some of the eurozone’s ongoing problems would happen as a fortuitous byproduct.

I am well aware that the history of the EU in the past 20 years has been a triumph of hope over experience. There are hundreds of ways in which this grand bargain might not happen. And there is only one, as far as I can see, that might just work. The chances do not look great. But they are not zero either.

FT : German car industry faces ‘day of reckoning’

German car industry faces ‘day of reckoning’
Tens of thousands of jobs cut as auto groups pump billions into electric technology

Two weeks ago a bumper crowd of restructuring experts flocked to the swanky environs of Frankfurt’s Villa Kennedy hotel, their sights firmly set on the casualties of the crisis sweeping the German car industry.

Days later, Mercedes-Benz owner Daimler and Volkswagen’s Audi brand announced more than 20,000 job losses, in the first real signs of the huge human cost of the sector’s transition from combustion engines to electric vehicles.

“The auto industry is in the midst of a far-reaching upheaval,” said Volkswagen chief executive Herbert Diess, whose company is seeking to reinvent itself as a world leader in battery-powered cars.

“No one will survive in the form they exist today,” predicted Ralf Kalmbach at consultancy Bain & Co, who has spent 32 years advising German carmakers.

The enormous expense of this transformation, he added, has left the engine of the country’s postwar Wirtschaftswunder, or economic miracle, facing the “biggest crisis since the invention of the automobile” by Karl Benz more than a century ago.

It is estimated that the German car industry, which directly employs 830,000 people and supports a further 2m in the wider economy, will be forced to plough some €40bn into battery-powered technologies over the next three years.

“We have seen the first few chapters of the transformation, but this is a book with many chapters,” warned Ola Kallenius, Daimler chief executive, last month, as he confirmed the carmaker would post significantly lower profits for at least two years.


German auto giants, from Daimler and Audi to suppliers including Continental and Bosch, have announced that around 50,000 job will be lost or are at risk so far this year, as their traditional businesses become less profitable. 

The global economic slowdown, exacerbated by the US-China trade war and the risk of Brexit, has forced manufacturers to revise heady sales projections.

They had expected to sell in excess of 100m vehicles in 2019. With just a few weeks left in the year, that figure is likely to be more like 90m. 

Increasingly localised production by the carmakers in China and North America to avoid tariffs has also sapped the exporting power of German-based plants, which are left catering to the more fragile European market.

To make matters worse, a demographic time bomb is ticking, which could permanently reduce the number of new car buyers, and a new raft of competitors, including the likes of Uber and Google’s Waymo, are emerging with products such as autonomous cars that will probably drive the future of transport.

“The German auto industry needs to learn to adapt faster, to change faster,” warned auto analyst Arndt Ellinghorst at Evercore ISI.

Despite these warnings, the premium carmakers have been reluctant to go “all-in” on electric technology, at the risk of alienating existing engine-loving customers.

With the electric car market still in its infancy, Daimler’s Mr Kallenius told investors that the Mercedes-owner would “not develop technology for the sake of technology”.

BMW, similarly, has been keen to play-up its traditional expertise. 

“We believe there is still much room for growth in the automotive sector,” BMW’s chief executive Oliver Zipse said, dismissing the earnings potential of so-called mobility services, such as car sharing and self-driving taxis.

“There is a long-term growing demand for individual mobility worldwide, especially in the premium segment. The fundamentals behind it are much stronger than the current dip in the overall market, which is mainly due to economic slowdown.”

Their confidence, however, jars with the impending bloodletting in the country’s powerhouse sector.

In the next decade, almost a quarter of a million auto jobs will be lost in the country, according to Ferdinand Dudenhöffer, the director of the Center for Automotive Research at the University of Duisburg-Essen. Smaller suppliers, such as paint shop Eisenmann, have gone out of business.

Car sales in China, which helped Germany’s biggest brands weather the financial crisis, have slowed for 17 months in a row, drastically reducing a key source of revenue at the precise moment it is needed to fund new technologies.

“We have kind of the worst situation now,” Mr Källenius told investors two weeks ago. “We have got to do the heavy lifting in the next three years.”

Despite widespread anxiety in the industry about the lack of demand for electric vehicles, strict EU carbon-emissions rules are forcing carmakers to accelerate their production plans, or face billions of euros in fines from Brussels. 

The EU’s targets for 2030 can mean that between 7m to 10.5m battery-powered cars will have to be on Germany’s roads by the end of the next decade.

Volkswagen, whose first mass-market battery-powered hatchback, the ID3, is rolling off production lines in east Germany, is “convinced that the transition to electric-mobility will gain traction next year,” according to VW’s Mr Diess.


As he announced plans last month to build a further 4m battery-powered vehicles, Mr Diess was adamant that “electrification is not a gamble”. But he warned that “the conversion to e-mobility requires resources,” which must be financed from VW’s “traditional businesses”.

While the world’s largest carmaker does enough of such business to absorb the investment costs of converting entire combustion engine car plants to zero-emission production, Germany’s premium manufacturers, Daimler and BMW, do not.

“For the moment, you have to consider that with every electric vehicle, manufacturers are losing a tremendous amount of money,” said Mr Kalmbach at Bain. That is not expected to change until the middle of the next decade.

A heavy reliance on the sales of profitable luxury cars has left executives with little room for manoeuvre.

“We had a couple of good years and the necessary work of applying cost discipline has not been done,” Mr Kalmbach added. “Companies added fat to their waists.”

VW managed to convert its factory in the east German city of Zwickau without any job losses, and Porsche created 1,500 new roles to build its new Tesla rival, the Taycan, in Stuttgart.

The unique strength of German labour unions has forced Daimler and Audi to provide job guarantees, which stretch to the end of the next decade, while VW’s supervisory board is dominated by its powerful workers’ representatives and local politicians, who would stand in the way of mass redundancies.

The cost of shedding jobs in Germany, often estimated at €100,000 per axed position, forces companies to consider reskilling programmes or wait for employees to retire.

Yet even the German car lobby, the VDA, predicts that the shift to electric cars will cause 70,000 jobs to go in the near future, as their assembly is far less labour intensive, and their components have fewer moving parts than combustion engine models. 

“Even during the financial crisis, there were hardly any lay-offs because of agreements with labour unions,” said Rainer Mehl, a managing director at consultancy Capgemini. “As this crisis gets tougher, there will probably be a need for deeper cuts.”

It seems Germany’s flagship brands are merely putting off the inevitable.

This is because they are still too profitable for widespread cuts to be politically palpable, said Max Warburton, a veteran auto analyst at Bernstein.

“In this industry you can only cut jobs in a crisis,” he added. “Deep down, they all know that. They all know they’re going to have to, they are just trying to postpone the day of reckoning.”

Instead, large carmakers are putting pressure on their suppliers, which are drastically reducing their headcount to remain competitive. 

Continental is doing away with 3,570 positions in Germany alone, while Bosch will slash thousands of jobs in the next two years, and employees at ZF have been protesting against looming cuts. The market for petrol and diesel engine components will decline at 7 per cent a year, according to a recent McKinsey study.

“The times are getting tougher, but this industry has always stood up to the competition and it has the necessary flexibility, determination and knowhow to withstand crises,” said Bernhard Mattes, the outgoing president of the VDA.

The engineering expertise that has helped Germany’s carmakers survive for 130 years would carry them through the tsunami of disruption that looms on the horizon, he added.

“We have no reason to be despondent. It isn’t the makers of vacuum cleaners, the postmen or the high-tech firms that launch innovative vehicles on to the market . . . The German auto industry will become a pioneer.”

FT : Hedge fund TCI vows to punish directors over climate change

Hedge fund TCI vows to punish directors over climate change
Manager seeks disclosure of emissions as he accuses other investors of ‘greenwash’

Christopher Hohn’s activist hedge fund TCI has outlined plans to punish directors of companies that fail to disclose their carbon dioxide emissions in a move that underlines rising investor concerns over climate change and the pressure on boardrooms to respond.

TCI has warned Airbus, Moody’s, Charter Communications and other companies to improve their pollution disclosure or it will vote against their directors and called for asset owners to fire fund managers that did not insist on climate transparency, according to letters seen by the FT. 

“Asset owners should fire asset managers that do not require such disclosure,” Sir Christopher said. He also accused BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, of “greenwash” because it does not require emissions disclosures. 

The decision by TCI, an activist fund with $28bn under management, comes as investors are becoming increasingly concerned about how climate risks will impact their portfolios. None of the world’s major financial centres have made climate risk disclosure mandatory, though regulators in London are weighing it.

“Investing in a company that doesn’t disclose its pollution is like investing in a company that doesn’t disclose its balance sheet,” said Sir Christopher, one of the highest paid fund managers in the industry. “If governments won’t force disclosure, then investors can force it themselves.”

TCI’s move comes ahead of UN climate talks in Madrid this week, and as Bank of England Governor Mark Carney — a strong advocate for more climate risk disclosure — announced he would take up a new post as UN envoy for climate action and finance from February

Sir Christopher, whose personal charity the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation donates around $150m a year to climate groups, said that it was time for investors to step up in the fight to save the earth.

“Major asset managers such as BlackRock have been shown to be full of greenwash,” he said, calling their record on voting for climate-relevant resolutions “appalling”.

“Investors don’t need to wait on regulators who are asleep at the switch and unwilling or unable to regulate emissions properly,” he said. “They can use their voting power to force change on companies who refuse to take their environmental emissions seriously. Investors have the power, and they have to use it. ”

Sir Christopher pointed to a report last week from InfluenceMap, a non-profit research group, which found that BlackRock and Capital Group were the least supportive out of the world’s 15 largest asset managers of climate-related shareholder resolutions which were covered in the study. 

A spokesperson for BlackRock said: “BlackRock has the largest stewardship team in the world, and engaged 370 companies globally on the topic of climate risk in the past two years, more than five times the number of climate-related shareholder proposals that came to a vote over the same period . . . We put a priority on engaging with a company on addressing climate-related issues even in the absence of shareholder proposals.”

TCI has asked the companies in its portfolio to disclose their annual carbon dioxide emissions through CDP, an environmental non-profit consultancy, and to publish emissions reduction targets.

TCI, which has seen its main fund rise by 39 per cent this year, said the worst climate performer in its portfolio was Charter Communications, the telecoms group, in which it holds a 4.2 per cent stake. Charter’s failure to disclose any emissions data were “unacceptable”, TCI wrote in a letter. “The company must disclose its GHG emissions, GHG reduction targets and a low carbon transition plan,” the letter to Charter said.

A spokesman for Charter said the company was preparing to release its first emissions repot in coming weeks, but declined to provide an on-the-record response. 

Other poor climate performers in TCI’s portfolio include Airbus, Moody’s, Anthem, Aena, Atlantia, Canadian Pacific, Getlink, and Univar — all of which have made some degree of disclosure, but received low grades from CDP.

In recent years groups such as BlackRock, Vanguard, Fidelity and State Street have all championed environment, social and governance products. Larry Fink, head of BlackRock, has been seen as a pioneer in this field because he has written missives — known as “Larry's Letter” — to companies he invests in urging them to seek a sense of corporate purpose.

However, some environmental campaigners have become critical about whether BlackRock and others are meeting their lofty targets, since a growing part of these asset managers' portfolios are run with passive strategies, based on indices, and automatically invested in companies with poor ESG records.

A spokesperson for Airbus said it was committed to sustainable aviation, and working to achieve net-zero emissions for its industrial operations by 2050. Moody’s did not respond to a request for comment.

>>> Weekend Papers Summary

* NYT (Saturday): Pressured by an expanding protest movement and a rising death toll, prime minister Adel Abdul Mahdi of Iraq told Parliament he will resign, taking the country into greater uncertainty and possibly months of turmoil ahead; Donald Trump re-launched negotiations with the Taliban in a jolting fashion by seeming to demand a cease-fire that his negotiators had long concluded was overly ambitious; The police shot and killed a man wearing a fake bomb on London Bridge Friday, after two people were fatally stabbed in what the police called a terrorist incident; Senator Lindsey Graham, “who has long prided himself on being an institutionalist, has gone from expressing an open mind about impeachment to becoming a leader of the president’s counterattack” and “an aggressive and unapologetically partisan defender of Trump”; Trump will travel to London next week for a NATO summit marking the alliance’s 70th anniversary, and will meet with French president Emmanuel Macron and German chancellor Angela Merkel, but not with UK prime minister Boris Johnson; Jerrold Nadler, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, asked Trump whether he intends to mount a defense during the committee’s consideration of impeachment articles, setting a deadline of next Friday for doing so; (Sunday): Front page investigative story uses Baltimore as a case study to report on how AMZN “may now reach into American’s daily existence in more ways than any corporation in history”; Venezuela’s devastating six-year economic crisis is hollowing out the school system, once the pride of the oil-rich nation and for decades an engine that made the country one of the most upwardly mobile in Latin America; Fentanyl sourced from China accounted for 97 percent of the drug seized from international mail services by U.S. law enforcement in 2016 and 2017, but Chinese president Xi Jinping’s promised crackdown appears to have slowed the widespread and open selling of the drug; + TWTR: Twitter suspended the accounts of Danielle Stella, a Republican hoping to challenge Democratic representative Ilhan Omar of Minnesota next year, after she suggested the congresswoman should be tried for treason and hanged; Sunday Business: Lead story profiles University College London economist Mariana Mazzucato, who is trying to change the way society thinks about economic value by arguing against the long-accepted binary of an agile private sector and a lumbering, inefficient state

* WSJ (Weekend): Front page story reports “The strength of the American consumer as a driving force behind the economy was on display during the annual Black Friday ritual, as shoppers headed to malls and visited websites looking for deals”; +/- Huawei: Chinese telecom giant plans to fight an FCC decision that further curtails its business with some of its few remaining customers in the U.S., as it continues to advocate for itself in an escalating battle with Washington; + AMZN: The Trump administration is testing a new method for federal agencies to buy office supplies and other goods online, a move that could give the e-commerce giant a foothold in a market worth as much as $50B a year; Bernie Sanders’s most adamant backers expect that he will be the Democratic nominee for president, but if that turns out not to be the case, they want Sanders to put up a fight; A Trump administration push for oil drilling off the coast of South Carolina and Florida faces resistance from Republican leaders on the Southeastern seaboard, who have pledged to put the beauty of the coastal waters above the U.S. thirst for oil; India’s economic slowdown is hurting rural residents as the prices of the commodities they grow and sell are rising more slowly than the things they buy, a growing problem that poses a major challenge for prime minister Narendra Modi; Economic growth in Canada slowed markedly in the third quarter after posting the fastest expansion among Group of Seven countries in the previous three-month period; The Center for Consumer Freedom, a Washington-based nonprofit partly funded by meat producers and other companies has launched a campaign to counter consumers’ belief that meat alternatives are healthier than regular meat; The bull run’s trajectory for next year looks like it will be far more modest than it was in 2019, say investment-bank strategists who forecast stock market performance, but few believe the longest-ever bull market is on its last leg; Lebanon’s repayment of a $1.5B sovereign bond failed to bolster the prices of its other bonds, reflecting mounting concern that the country is running out of cash to meet its foreign obligations; H.O.T.S.: “Airlines are under mounting pressure to improve their environmental credentials, but have few good options”; UK-listed Ocado has earned its place as one of Europe’s most-promising grocery technology ventures, but there are few hard numbers to back the soaring share price; The rise of BABA has brought Chinese parcel shippers plenty of business, but it has also fostered cutthroat competition

* FT (Weekend): DAI’s plan to lay off 10,000 people, a major blow to Germany’s industrial engine, comes as Berlin is implementing a strategy designed to protect sensitive technology from foreign takeovers; India’s economic growth slowed further in the third quarter, highlighting the depth of the downturn afflicting a nation that was only recently reveling in its status as the world’s fastest-growing economy; Big Read story on LVMH says the company’s acquisition of TIF “is the latest in 40 years of voracious dealmaking by Bernard Arnault,” who is “betting on a growing middle class and that conglomerates won’t kill the industry’s artisanal allure”; “Millions of Americans avoided shopping malls and instead reached for their phones to get Black Friday bargains, fueling a boom in online orders over the extended Thanksgiving holiday,” with AMZN capturing 61% of the market share; Lex Column: Ocado’s journey from an overpriced player in Iow-margin food deliveries to snazzy tech company has been remarkable, but may not justify a quadrupling of the share price; Postal Savings Bank of China may be come a safe choice for conservative portfolios when its price drops, but investors seeking growth now should look elsewhere; In the biotech sector, “many are called, but few are chosen”—the number of fledgling startups dwarfs the number of successful buyouts; Comment: Equality should be judged over a lifetime, says Merryn Somerset Webb, and young people calling for the rich to be heavily taxed may regret their words at some point, since age is a huge driver of wealth and income.

* NY POST (Saturday): With a dearth of new, blockbuster toys expected this holiday season, retailers have had to display toy lines that are a year or more old; +/- AAPL: Design chief Jony Ives has left the company, ending a 27-year stint at the company to form his own design firm, LoveFrom, whose roster of clients will include Apple; (Sunday): Millions of people could lose their food stamps, with New Yorkers being particularly hard hit, under new Department of Agriculture eligibility rules, with about two million households nationwide seeing $127 per month in cuts; A pollster for former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg said the Democratic presidential candidate’s campaign will focus on climate change, gun violence, income inequality and education; Researchers at The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research have developed a lightweight, wearable electrode sleeve that regulates and triggers finger movement in quadriplegics, giving hope to millions of people living with paralysis across the U.S