FT : Tether: the $180bn gold whale

Tether: the $180bn gold whale

The secretive crypto group buying billions in gold
Tether is one of the world’s most profitable cryptocurrency companies, but it’s lately seemed more bullish on bullion than digital coins.

Tether’s main offering is the stablecoin USDT, a cryptocurrency pegged to the US dollar that is in effect the largest digital money market fund. It has issued roughly $180bn of USDT and ploughed most of that money into US Treasuries while keeping billions of dollars in interest as profits.

But the small group of people who run Tether are investing its “deposits” far from cryptocurrencies, signalling they are not industry cheerleaders. The secretive company has roiled gold markets this year, becoming the world’s biggest holder of the precious metal outside of central banks, Bryce Elder writes in FT Alphaville. 

It has a stockpile “roughly equal to smaller central banks, such as Korea, Hungary and Greece”, according to the investment bank Jefferies. 

Last quarter the company’s gold purchases accounted for nearly 2 per cent of total gold demand and were equivalent to almost 12 per cent of central bank purchases, Jefferies estimates.



Sources tell DD that the gold bets are a reflection of Tether insiders’ belief that the commodity is the world’s best store of value and a better hedge against inflation than digital currencies. (While Tether does still hold billions in bitcoin, it now holds more money in gold.)

Tether’s gold ambitions go far beyond its own vault and into the world of dealmaking. Our attention is on Tether’s dealmaking around gold royalty companies, which invest in mines in return for a percentage of future revenues.

In June, Tether Investments, which is in charge of investing the company’s profits, paid $105mn for a minority stake in Toronto-listed Elemental Altus. It invested a further $100mn in Elemental in September as it announced a merger with rival EMX.

Tether now holds a controlling stake in Elemental, company filings show. Sources tell DD that Tether has bigger plans for Elemental: it’s looking to use its controlling stake to roll up other gold royalty companies.

“Their goal is to keep consolidating the small to mid-cap gold royalty space,” said a person briefed on the matter. Tether had held discussions with multiple gold royalty companies, the FT reported in September.

While some believe Tether’s gold royalty roll-up strategy is canny, not everyone is a fan. Tether “is the weirdest company I have ever dealt with”, one commodity industry executive recently told the FT.

Gold royalties have an advantage over stockpiled bullion: they give Tether a fixed exposure to gold that doesn’t change even if prices soar.

Tether’s gold bet comes as many on Wall Street are questioning whether its finances are as robust as the company claims.

Rating agency S&P Global on Wednesday downgraded Tether’s assets to its lowest rating, “weak”, warning that Tether’s rising exposure to high-risk reserve assets could leave its stablecoin undercollateralised in a crisis. 

FT : EU’s frozen-assets loan plan risks rattling markets, Euroclear warns

EU’s frozen-assets loan plan risks rattling markets, Euroclear warns
Proposal for ‘reparations’ funding for Ukraine using immobilised Russian assets would be seen as ‘confiscation’

European governments would face higher debt costs if the EU presses ahead with plans to use Russian frozen assets to support €140bn of loans to Ukraine, the main custodian of the assets has warned.

In a letter seen by the Financial Times, the Brussels-based central securities depository Euroclear argued that the latest loan plan for Ukraine would be perceived as “confiscation” outside the EU and spook investors in European sovereign debt.

The EU has frozen some €210bn Russian state assets following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, of which around €185bn are held at Euroclear. The Ukraine peace negotiations have renewed the pressure to agree terms for the €140bn loan for Kyiv using the immobilised Russian sovereign assets.

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen told the European parliament on Wednesday the commission “is ready to present a legal text” on a loan backed by the immobilised assets. But the debt plan remains contentious and many of the technical details remain unresolved.

In its letter to von der Leyen and EU Council president António Costa, Euroclear warned that the so-called “reparations loan” risked damaging the attractiveness of the European financial markets and the investment climate in Europe.

“The resultant risk premium will lead to a sustained increase in European sovereign bond spreads, raising borrowing costs for all member states,” Euroclear chief executive Valérie Urbain writes in the letter.

Urbain said that the initiative hurt investment in the continent “as investors, particularly sovereign wealth funds and central banks, will perceive this initiative as being equivalent to confiscation of central bank reserves, undermining the rule of law”.

The European Commission has argued that the proposed scheme does not amount to confiscation, while acknowledging that there is a risk it might be viewed as such.

Urbain argued that forcing Euroclear to invest in “zero-interest tailored-debt instrument funding” in order to enact the scheme would be seen as confiscation by Russia, leading to retaliation and potential legal challenges that Euroclear should be covered for.

“This will lead to compensatory payments by [EU] member states to Euroclear . . . resulting in financial exposure for member states,” Urbain wrote.

She said the scheme should include unconditional, on-demand guarantees to cover Euroclear “as long as there remains legal exposure”. This would include retaliation risks in Russia and other countries, liquidity risks and “any other risks related to the subscription of the instrument”.

The letter echoes long-standing concerns raised by Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever around legal and financial repercussions for his country. Belgium wants to ensure other governments share the risks and include assets immobilised in their jurisdictions.

Since EU leaders failed to agree on the loan at their last summit in October, von der Leyen has also floated the idea of providing bilateral grants or raising new joint debt to fund Ukraine if they are unable to agree how to use frozen Russian assets.

But US President Donald Trump’s new peace push for Ukraine, which initially proposed the frozen assets are used for US-led investment funds in Ukraine and Russia, has raised pressure on the bloc to decide on the loan proposal.

Both the commission and a majority of EU countries hope to clinch a deal on the loan, which would require unanimous support, at the next leaders meeting in Brussels on December 18. Euroclear declined to comment.

FT : Convatec revives itself after post-private equity slump

Convatec revives itself after post-private equity slump
Karim Bitar, who passed away last month, praised for turnaround

When Karim Bitar arrived at Convatec in 2019, the FTSE 100 medical technology group was floundering. The company had issued two profit warnings in the space of a year, its share price was in the doldrums and the board was on alert for a hostile bid.

“Most people thought the business should be broken up,” says Jonny Mason, former Convatec finance chief and Bitar’s successor as chief executive. “Well, Karim disagreed with all of that.”

Over the following six years Bitar, who passed away in October after a period of medical leave, orchestrated an impressive turnaround. He brought in new leaders across the company, invested heavily and focused the business on chronic care, developing products for those with long-term medical conditions.

Now, the company’s share price has recovered to its post-initial public offering level and it is predicting double-digit earnings growth in 2026. Analysts believe it will deliver an operating margin of 16 per cent on revenues of £1.9bn this year, up from a 5 per cent margin in 2019 on revenues of £1.4bn.

“It’s a wonderful achievement”, says Mason, reflecting on his predecessor’s success.

Announcing Bitar’s passing, chair John McAdam described him as a “much admired and respected leader, with strong values, conviction, and above all else, an unshakeable focus on people relying on Convatec products, services and solutions”.

Convatec, which makes medical products such as wound dressings and colostomy bags, started life as a division of pharmaceutical group ER Squibb & Sons, before coming under private equity ownership in 2008. It went public in the biggest UK IPO of 2016 but struggled to deliver growth, with investors questioning its cluttered product portfolio, lacklustre research and development spend and slim operating margins.

By 2019, its shares had fallen to nearly half their listing price and its previous CEO had stepped down on the back of the profit warnings. The company was rudderless and there was talk of a takeover by Swedish private equity group EQT.

It was into that environment that Bitar stepped in 2019, with a plan to rejuvenate the business by narrowing its product range to a few key areas, increasing investment and rejigging the company’s organisational structure.

Convatec’s offering was trimmed to just four categories — advanced wound dressings, ostomy devices, products for those with urinary incontinence and infusion sets used to deliver drugs to the bloodstream.

A scattering of regional organisations within the company was done away with and in its place, four global presidents, each with a focus on one product category, were installed. It was a change that “ensured standardisation across the world”, says Mason. “We have a vision which everybody in the organisation knows.”

On a personal level, Bitar had “strategic clarity” and could spot talented individuals, “coaching and mentoring them”, Mason adds. “He was very personable, a real family man and he brought that caring dimension to work with him every day”, a factor that Mason says contributed to improved employee engagement.

“From an analyst perspective, what started to change was the deployment of capital,” says Miles Dixon, head of healthcare and life sciences research at UK investment bank Peel Hunt. Over the period Bitar was at the helm, R&D spending more than doubled to $111mn in 2024.

At first, all that spending ate into profit margins, frustrating some investors. But Bitar’s strategy eventually came good, with products that improved the experience of patients, and ultimately, increased revenues for the business.

One of Convatec’s latest products helps address the spasms brought on by advanced Parkinson’s disease. Patients typically take tablets that control the involuntary movements, but their effectiveness wears off between doses. Convatec addressed the problem by developing a device that delivers the medication continuously into tissue beneath the skin, where it is then absorbed into the bloodstream.

Mason recalls the “remarkable” impact it had for one early user, who was “shaking quite dramatically and unable to complete household tasks” such as making a cup of coffee, but was able to do so thanks to the device and a drug developed by biotech group AbbVie.


There remain challenges for Convatec as it moves forward, though.

While it has escaped President Donald Trump’s tariff war largely unscathed, a push to crack down on healthcare costs has hit the company in the US. Earlier this year Convatec’s share price fell sharply after US regulators indicated they wanted more evidence on the efficacy of its InnovaMatrix wound care membrane. InnovaMatrix makes up just 3 per cent of Convatec’s total revenue, but investors grew anxious because it is one of the company’s fastest growing products by sales.

Nonetheless, Peel Hunt’s Dixon says the company’s story is a rare example of a successful turnaround in the healthcare sector. “Delivering growth is incredibly hard and it’s no mean feat to do so on public markets with a company that, frankly, had lost a lot of trust with investors.”

For Mason, “the sadness of Karim passing on immediately after achieving this is very poignant”. But, he says, “it’s a fabulous legacy” that Bitar leaves behind.

TechCrunch : Here are the 49 US AI startups that have raised $100M or more in 20

Here are the 49 US AI startups that have raised $100M or more in 2025

Last year was monumental for the AI industry in the U.S. and beyond.
There were 49 startups that raised funding rounds worth $100 million or more in 2024, per our count at TechCrunch; three companies raised more than one “mega-round,” and seven companies raised rounds that were $1 billion in size or larger.


How will 2025 compare? As we enter near the final month of the year, 2025 has already matched 2024 in terms of companies raising rounds that are $100 million and larger. There are also significantly more companies that have raised multiple funding rounds larger than $100 million this year compared to last.
Here are all the U.S. AI companies that have raised $100 million this year:
November
  • Anysphere, the maker of viral vibe-coding platform Cursor, raised $2.3 billion in a funding round that valued the company at $29.3 billion. The round was announced on November 13 and is the company’s second funding round this year.
  • Parallel, which builds web infrastructure for AI agents, raised a $100 million Series A round that was announced on November 12. The round was co-led by Index Ventures and Kleiner Perkins.
  • Healthcare AI agent startup Hippocratic AI raised a $126 million Series C round that valued the company at $3.5 billion. The round was the company’s second this year, was announced on November 3, and was led by Avenir Growth.
October
  • Fireworks AI, a platform that allows users to build AI applications using open source models, raised a $250 million Series C round that was announced on October 28. The round valued the company at $4 billion.
  • Enterprise AI startup Uniphore is valued at $2.5 billion after a $260 million Series F round that was announced on October 22. The round included Snowflake Ventures, Nvidia, Databricks Ventures, and AMD, among others.
  • Sesame, a voice AI company, raised a $250 million Series B round co-led by Sequoia and Spark Capital. The round was announced on October 21 and also included SignalRank as a participant.
  • Cambridge, Massachusetts’s based OpenEvidence, which builds an AI chatbot for the medical field, raised its second funding round of 2025. The $200 million Series C round was announced on October 20 and valued the company at $6 billion.
  • Lila Sciences, which is looking to build a science superintelligence platform, announced its second funding round of 2025 on October 14. The $350 million Series A round was co-led by Braidwell and Collective Global.
  • DeepSeek competitor Reflection AI announced its second mega-round of the year on October 9. The $2 billion Series B round valued the company at $8 billion and was led by Nvidia.
  • EvenUp, which builds AI for the personal injury legal field, announced a $150 million Series E round that valued the company at more $2 billion on October 7. The round was led by Bessemer with participation from Lightspeed, Bain Capital and SignalFire, among others.
September
  • Periodic Labs, which is building an AI scientist, announced a $300 million seed round on September 30. Felicis and Andreessen Horowitz led the round with participation from Nvidia, Lightspeed, and Khosla Ventures, among others.
  • Cerebras Systems, an AI infrastructure company, raised a sizable $1.1 billion Series G round that valued the company at $8.1 billion. The round was announced on September 30 and was co-led by Fidelity and Atreides Management.
  • Modular announced a $250 million funding round on September 24. The round was led by US Innovative Technology Fund with participation from GV, Greylock, and General Catalyst, among others.
  • Distyl AI, which builds AI enterprise software, raised a $175 million Series B round that was announced on September 23. This round valued the startup at $1.8 billion and included investors like Khosla Ventures and Lightspeed.
  • AI infrastructure startup Upscale AI raised a sizable $100 million seed round that was co-led by Maverick Silicon and Mayfield. The round was announced on September 17 and also included StepStone Group, Stanford University, and Qualcomm Ventures, among others.
  • Groq, an AI inference company, raised a $750 million Series E round that valued the company at nearly $6.9 billion. The round was announced on September 17 and was led by Disruptive.
  • AI training startup Invisible Technologies was valued at $2 billion after a $100 million fundraise that was announced on September 16. The raise was led by Vanara Capital with participation from Greycroft, Tallwoods Capital, and Freestyle Capital, among others.
  • Cognition AI, the creator of vibe-coding agent Devin, raised a $400 million Series C round that was announced on September 8. The round was led by Founders Fund and valued the company at $10.2 billion.
  • AI Infrastructure startup Baseten raised a $150 million Series D round that valued the company at $2.1 billion. The September 5 round was led by Bond with participation from CapitalG, IVP and Spark Capital, among others.
  • Bret Taylor’s customer service AI agent platform Sierra raised $350 million in a round led by Greenoaks Capital. This fundraise was announced on September 4 and valued Sierra at more than $10 billion.
  • You.com, a personalized AI search engine, raised a $100 million Series C round led by Cox Enterprises. The round was announced on September 3 and valued the company at $1.5 billion.
  • AI research lab Anthropic raised its second round of 2025 in September. Anthropic announced a $13 billion Series F round on September 2 that valued the company at $183 billion. The round was led by Iconiq, Fidelity, and Lightspeed.
August
  • Healthcare and housing automation platform EliseAI raised $250 million in a Series E round that valued the startup at $2.2 billion. The round, which was announced on August 20, was led by Andreessen Horowitz.
  • Decart, an AI research lab, raised $100 million at a $3.1 billion valuation. The round included Sequoia Capital, Benchmark, and Zeev Ventures, among others, and was announced on August 7.
July
  • Generative media platform Fal raised a $125 million Series C round led by Meritech Capital Partners. The company announced the round, which values Fal at $1.5 billion, on July 31. Salesforce Ventures, Shopify Ventures, Google AI Futures Fund, and others joined the round.
  • Five-year-old Ambience Healthcare, which is building an AI healthcare operating system, raised a $243 million Series C round that was led by Oak HC/FT and Andreessen Horowitz. Kleiner Perkins, OpenAI Startup Fund, Smash Capital, and others also participated in the round.
  • Reka AI, an AI research lab, raised $110 million in a round that included Snowflake and Nvidia. The Series B round was announced on July 22 and values the company at $1 billion.
  • AI research lab Thinking Machines Lab confirmed that it raised $2 billion on July 15. This sizable seed round was led by Andreessen Horowitz with participation from Nvidia, Accel, and AMD, among others. The round values the company at $12 billion.
  • Cambridge, Massachusetts-based OpenEvidence, which is building an AI-powered search tool for clinicians, raised $210 million at a $3.5 billion valuation. The Series B round was announced on July 15 and was led by Kleiner Perkins and GV.
  • Harmonic, which is building a mathematical reasoning engine, raised a $100 million Series B round led by Kleiner Perkins. The round was announced on July 10 and values the company at $875 million.
June
  • Healthcare AI unicorn Abridge announced it raised a $300 million Series E round that values the company at $5.3 billion. The round was led by Andreessen Horowitz with Khosla Ventures participating. It was the company’s second round of 2025.
  • Harvey, which builds AI tools for the legal industry, announced it raised its second $300 million round of 2025 on June 23. This latest Series E round was co-led by Kleiner Perkins and Coatue and brings the company’s valuation to $5 billion.
  • Healthcare AI startup Tennr announced it raised a $101 million Series C round led by IVP with participation from Lightspeed Venture Partners, GV, and Andreessen Horowitz, among others. The round values the company at $605 million.
  • Enterprise search startup Glean continues to rake in cash. The company announced a $150 million Series F round on June 10, led by Wellington Management with participation from Sequoia, Lightspeed Venture Partners, and Kleiner Perkins, among others. Glean is now valued at $7.25 billion.
  • Anysphere, the AI research lab behind AI coding tool Cursor, raised a sizable $900 million Series C round that values the company at nearly $10 billion. The round was led by Thrive Capital with participation from Andreessen Horowitz, Accel, and DST Global.
May
  • AI data labeling startup Snorkel AI announced a $100 million Series D round on May 29, valuing the company at $1.3 billion. The round was led by Addition with participation from Prosperity7 Ventures, Lightspeed Venture Partners, and Greylock.
  • LMArena, a popular, community-driven benchmarking tool for AI models, raised a $100 million seed round that valued the startup at $600 million. The round was announced on May 21 and was co-led by Andreessen Horowitz and UC Investments. Lightspeed Venture Partners, Kleiner Perkins, and Felicis also participated, among others.
  • Las Vegas-based AI infrastructure company TensorWave announced a $100 million Series A round on May 14. The round was co-led by Magnetar Capital and AMD Ventures with participation from Prosperity7 Ventures, Nexus Venture Partners, and Maverick Silicon.
April
  • SandboxAQ closed a $450 million Series E round on April 4 that valued the AI model company at $5.7 billion. The round included Nvidia, Google, and Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalio among other investors.
  • Runway, which creates AI models for media production, raised a $308 million Series D round that was announced on April 3, valuing the company at $3 billion. It was led by General Atlantic. SoftBank, Nvidia, and Fidelity also participated.
March
  • AI behemoth OpenAI raised a record-breaking $40 billion funding round that valued the startup at $300 billion. This round, which closed on March 31, was led by SoftBank with participation from Thrive Capital, Microsoft, and Coatue, among others.
  • On March 25, Nexthop AI, an AI infrastructure company, announced that it had raised a Series A round led by Lightspeed Venture Partners. The $110 million round also included Kleiner Perkins, Battery Ventures, and Emergent Ventures, among others.
  • Cambridge Massachusetts-based Insilico Medicine raised $110 million for its generative AI-powered drug discovery platform as announced on March 13. This Series E round valued the company at $1 billion and was co-led by Value Partners and Pudong Chuangtou.
  • AI infrastructure company Celestial AI raised a $250 million Series C round that valued the company at $2.5 billion. The March 11 round was led by Fidelity with participation from Tiger Global, BlackRock, and Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan, among others.
  • Lila Sciences raised a $200 million seed round as it looks to create a science superintelligence platform. The round was led by Flagship Pioneering. The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based company also received funding from March Capital, General Catalyst, and ARK Venture Fund, among others.
  • Brooklyn-based Reflection.Ai, which looks to build superintelligent autonomous systems, raised a $130 million Series A round that values the 1-year-old company at $580 million. The round was led by Lightspeed Venture Partners and CRV.
  • AI coding startup Turing closed a Series E round on March 7 that valued the startup, which partners with LLM companies, at $2.2 billion. The $111 million round was led by Khazanah Nasional with participation from WestBridge Capital, Gaingels, and Sozo Ventures, among others.
  • Shield AI, an AI defense tech startup, raised $240 million in a Series F round that closed on March 6. This round was co-led by L3Harris Technologies and Hanwha Aerospace, with participation from Andreessen Horowitz and the US Innovative Technology Fund, among others. The round valued the company at $5.3 billion
  • AI research and large language model company Anthropic raised $3.5 billion in a Series E round that valued the startup at $61.5 billion. The round was announced on March 3 and was led by Lightspeed with participation from Salesforce Ventures, Menlo Ventures, and General Catalyst, among others.
February
  • Together AI, which creates open source generative AI and AI model development infrastructure, raised a $305 million Series B round that valued the company at $3.3 billion. The February 20 round was co-led by Prosperity7 and General Catalyst with participation from Salesforce Ventures, Nvidia, Lux Capital, and others.
  • AI infrastructure company Lambda raised a $480 million Series D round that was announced on February 19. The round valued the startup at nearly $2.5 billion and was co-led by SGW and Andra Capital. Nvidia, G Squared, ARK Invest, and others also participated.
  • Abridge, an AI platform that transcribes patient-clinician conversations, was valued at $2.75 billion in a Series D round that was announced on February 17. The $250 million round was co-led by IVP and Elad Gil. Lightspeed, Redpoint, and Spark Capital also participated, among others.
  • Eudia, an AI legal tech company, raised $105 million in a Series A round led by General Catalyst. Floodgate, Defy Ventures, and Everywhere Ventures also participated in the round in addition to other VC firms and numerous angel investors. The round closed on February 13.
  • AI hardware startup EnCharge AI raised a $100 million Series B round that also closed on February 13. The round was led by Tiger Global with participation from Scout Ventures, Samsung Ventures, and RTX Ventures, among others. The Santa Clara-based business was founded in 2022.
  • AI legal tech company Harvey raised a $300 million Series D round that valued the 3-year-old company at $3 billion. The round was led by Sequoia and announced on February 12. OpenAI Startup Fund, Kleiner Perkins, Elad Gil, and others also participated in the raise.
January
  • Synthetic voice startup ElevenLabs raised a $180 million Series C round that valued the company at more than $3 billion. It was announced on January 30. The round was co-led by ICONIQ Growth and Andreessen Horowitz. Sequoia, NEA, Salesforce Ventures, and others also participated in the round.
  • Hippocratic AI, which develops large language models for the healthcare industry, announced a $141 million Series B round on January 9. This round valued the company at more than $1.6 billion and was led by Kleiner Perkins. Andreessen Horowitz, Nvidia, and General Catalyst also participated, among others.

WSJ : The Untold Story of Charlie Munger’s Final Years

The Untold Story of Charlie Munger’s Final Years
The Berkshire vice chair was making gutsy investments, forging unlikely friendships and facing new challenges to the end

Charlie Munger owned a house with spectacular ocean views in Montecito, Calif. The Berkshire Hathaway BRK.B 0.52%increase; green up pointing triangle vice chairman had designed the entire gated community, which locals called “Mungerville.” At one point, he told a friend he expected to spend his last years there.

Instead, Munger chose to remain in his longtime home in Los Angeles. The place didn’t even have air conditioning. During a heat wave three years ago, friends brought electric fans and bags of ice to cool his library.

Munger didn’t care. The home was close to people he liked and projects he found stimulating. Rather than a quiet life by the sea, Munger spent his final years chasing gutsy investments, forging unlikely friendships and facing new challenges.

When Munger died two years ago, weeks before his 100th birthday, the billionaire investor was among the nation’s most beloved businessmen, celebrated for his wit and wisdom—and the role he played helping Warren Buffett build Berkshire Hathaway into a trillion-dollar company.

The unexpected last chapter of Munger’s life is less well-known. In the year before his death, Munger made over $50 million from a bet on an out-of-favor industry he had shunned for 60 years. He revved up his real-estate activities, working with a young neighbor to place big, long-term wagers, unusual for a nonagenarian. He faced down health challenges and wrestled with the future.

“Even a week or two before passing away, he was asking questions such as, ‘Does Moore’s Law apply in the age of AI?’” recalls his friend Jamie Montgomery, referring to whether artificial intelligence would see exponential gains like those experienced in computational power.

Friends and family say Munger’s eventful last period offers lessons for investors—and a blueprint for how to age with grace, equanimity and purpose.

“To the day he died, that mind was running,” says Munger’s stepson, Hal Borthwick. “He never stopped learning.”

A graduate of Harvard Law School who co-founded the law firm of Munger, Tolles & Olson in Los Angeles, Munger quit his practice in 1962 to focus on investing. Later, he shuttered most of his investing partnerships, joining Berkshire in 1978 as its vice chairman.

Munger became Buffett’s consigliere and sounding board, pushing Buffett to loosen his investment parameters beyond bargain investments to buy high-quality companies.

“Charlie and I are interchangeable in business decisions,” Buffett said in 1982.

Buffett declined to comment for this article.

By the last decade of his life, Munger was less involved with Berkshire Hathaway, despite a stake in the company valued in 2023 at $2.2 billion. He spoke with Buffett every week or two. Buffett was based in Omaha, Neb., and Munger lived in Los Angeles, and they both had hearing issues, making communication more difficult.

“They would scream to each other,” says Whitney Jackson, the wife of Munger’s grandson and a frequent visitor to Munger’s home in his last years. “It was likely meant to be confidential, but anyone within a mile’s radius could hear them.”

Munger turned his attention to other endeavors. He was a board member—and superfan—of retail giant Costco, with a stake valued at about $100 million at his death. He invested in hedge-fund manager Li Lu’s Himalaya Capital and smaller investment firms in Boston and Melbourne.

Munger made his own investments, too. Sitting in a recliner in his library, he’d grab green Value Line binders from a nearby desk and pore through data on publicly traded companies.

For decades, he barely looked at coal stocks, friends say, but in 2023, these companies grabbed his attention. Coal usage was in a long-term decline, and investors saw a bleak future for the industry. Yet many producers remained profitable, trading at inexpensive levels. Coal will remain necessary as global energy demand grows, Munger argued to friends and others.

“He read an article that said coal was down the chute,” Borthwick recalls. “He said, ‘Horse feathers.’ ”

In May 2023, Munger purchased shares of coal miner Consol Energy. Later in the year, he bought shares of Alpha Metallurgical Resources, which produces coal for steel production. By the time of Munger’s death, Consol had doubled in value. Alpha had also surged. Together he scored paper gains of more than $50 million, friends say.

“He made a very large bet, and it turned out really well,” Borthwick says.


Consol has since merged with another producer and the stock has fallen. Alpha has dropped, as well. Investor Mohnish Pabrai, a friend of Munger’s, says his coal investments would still be profitable if he held them today.

The moves taught Pabrai a lesson, he says: “You don’t need to slow down, you just keep going.”

Munger made another unusual late-in-life wager. It began in 2005, when Munger was 81 years old and a 17-year-old neighbor, Avi Mayer, knocked on the door of Munger’s longtime home in Los Angeles’s Hancock Park neighborhood. Mayer presented Munger with a Hebrew volume containing the Five Books of Moses.

“I had read about him and thought he was Jewish,” says Mayer, whose grandfather had recently died, leaving a hole in his life. (Munger was not Jewish.)

Mayer was having difficulties in school. He battled ADHD and was discouraged about his future.

“I was insecure,” he says. “My friends were going to college and I wasn’t.”

Mayer began spending time with Munger.

“He listened to my problems and talked about life principles and personal values,” Mayer says.

Munger told others that he appreciated Mayer’s intelligence and ambition. The famed investor supported Mayer as he weighed skipping college, saying Mayer could instead attend “Munger University.” So that’s what Mayer did.

“I watched him in action and learned from him, and he handed me books once in a while,” Mayer says. They became close and Munger arranged for kosher food to be delivered to his home so they could dine together.

When Mayer partnered with his childhood friend, Reuven Gradon, to invest in real estate, Munger studied their early moves. A few years later, he offered to back the young men and their company, Afton Properties. “I’m graduating you,” he said. Starting around 2017, the three men purchased nearly 10,000 “garden” apartments in Southern California, becoming one of largest owners of these low-rise apartments in the state.

In the years before his death, Munger involved himself in almost every aspect of their business—choosing neighborhoods, assessing construction, even picking paint colors. He had special interest in landscaping details, insisting on low-density building complexes, deciding the company should spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to plant new trees, says Mayer, now 37.

Munger encouraged Mayer and Gradon to take long-term loans—even as other real-estate investors favored short-term debt that could be quickly refinanced—arguing that securing favorable interest rates and holding assets for years was the way to profit.

The moves panned out: Afton’s holdings are now worth about $3 billion, according to a person close to the matter. Munger remained involved until the end, helping negotiate the purchase of a building in Santa Maria, Calif., a transaction that closed days after his death. It was across from a new Costco supercenter, making it extra special to Munger.

Munger didn’t tell many people, but in the last decade of his life, he had begun to face health difficulties. Back in 1978, a surgeon had bungled cataract surgery, leaving him blind in his left eye. He learned to compensate, installing bright lights around the house. Around 2014, though, Munger experienced a problem in the optic nerve of his right eye. He faced the possibility of going blind—yet he took the setback in stride, says Li Lu, a regular visitor. Munger decided to adjust his life, asking others to read to him and contemplating other steps.

“I’ll have to learn Braille,” he told one friend. He had studied it after his botched cataract surgery but never mastered it. He was ready to try again.

That turned out not to be necessary. His right eye slowly improved, but Munger’s movement became constricted. Around 2016, he lost the ability to play golf, a longtime passion, and relied on a walking stick. Playing bridge with others became difficult. Munger, who had lost his wife in 2010, feared loneliness and irrelevance.

He chose to spend more time with friends, buoying his spirits. Each Tuesday, he met a half-dozen or so business associates and others for breakfast, usually at the Los Angeles Country Club. The group typically arrived at 7:30 a.m. and could go for hours. They discussed investments, traded barbs and shared jokes. Regulars included investors John Hawkins and John Conlin, Uber Chairman Ron Sugar, and later Bobby Kotick, the former Activision chief executive. Robert Bradway, Amgen’s CEO, made occasional visits. Munger, at the head of the table, told stories and shared philosophies.

“He’d always say, ‘Take out Berkshire’s top five investments and its returns are pretty middling,’ ” says Montgomery, a lesson to the group that success can come from just a few winning moves.

As a younger man, Munger could be cranky and acerbic; now, he was warm and reflective.

“At my age, you make new friends, or you don’t have any friends,” he told the group.

Munger retained a bit of an edge, though. When a senior Ford executive joined the breakfast club one time, Munger surprised the group by outlining the carmaker’s profitability—by product line—over the previous 25 years. Then, Munger hit him with a zinger.

“I don’t know why you guys bother making cars,” he said, noting that the bulk of Ford’s profits came from trucks.

Munger appeared invigorated by the meetings, the last of which took place 10 days before his death.

We all learned from Charlie, and Charlie liked that he learned from us,” says Paul Major, a local businessman who was another regular.

Food became a special passion. Each Friday, friends drove to Munger’s home for a potluck lunch, carrying chicken sandwiches with butter on soft white bread, the crusts sometimes removed. They brought fruit or salad, along with cherry pies and vanilla ice cream.

“Occasionally we would have some See’s Candy for a special treat,” Montgomery says.

For years, Munger’s family tried keeping him on a healthy diet. He resisted the effort. “He sipped water like it was poison,” says Jackson, his grandson’s wife.

By the end, the family’s resolve melted. They began ordering him takeout.

“His last delivery was Korean fried chicken: A whole chicken, kimchi fried rice and waffle fries,” Jackson says.

Munger and Jackson made a list of his favorite meals, which she conjured up. He had fond memories of eating Spam during a stint in the army, for instance, so she cooked a dish of Spam fried rice.

“He went on and on about how it wasn’t how he remembered it, and that it had changed,” Jackson recalls. “I said ‘Granddad, it’s your taste buds.’ ”

Jackson tracked down the former chef of New York’s Plaza Hotel, asking for his corned-beef hash recipe, which included lobster. But most of Munger’s faves were easier to obtain.

“He loved Costco hot dogs,” she says. “In the hospital, one of the last meals he had was an In-N-Out burger and a Diet Coke.”

Munger was counting down to a 100th birthday party on Jan. 1, 2024. Friends and longtime business associates including Jim Sinegal, Costco’s co-founder, planned to fly to Los Angeles for the festivities.

Munger’s health was faltering, though. He sensed the end was near. When a friend asked how he was feeling, he replied: “There’s a lot wrong with me.”

When he discussed his legacy, he said he was comfortable with his accomplishments and optimistic about Berkshire’s future.

“Once it’s built, you don’t need to be Warren and Charlie,” he told a friend. “What we have is a framework for looking at investments.”

Near the end of life, Munger leaned on humor for strength. He told family members that Diet Coke was responsible for his longevity, lightening the mood.

​And he shared a wish with a visitor.

“Oh, to be 86 again,” he said.

Late on Thanksgiving evening two years ago, days before his death, Munger was admitted to a hospital near Montecito. He asked family members to leave the room so he could call Buffett one last time.

They shared a last farewell.

WSJ : Germany’s Secret Plan for War With Russia

Germany’s Secret Plan for War With Russia
A classified blueprint shows why weapons or troop numbers alone may not decide the outcome of a broader conflict between Moscow and the West

BERLIN—A dozen senior German officers convened at a triangle-shaped military compound in Berlin about 2½ years ago to work on a secret plan for a war with Russia.

Now they’re racing to implement it.

Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine ended decades of stability in Europe. Since then, the region has embarked on its fastest military buildup since the end of World War II. But the outcome of a future war won’t depend only on the number of troops and weapons in the field.

It will also hinge on the success of the monumental logistical operation at the heart of Operation Plan Germany, the 1,200 page-long classified document drafted behind the nondescript walls of the Julius Leber Barracks.

The blueprint details how as many as 800,000 German, U.S. and other NATO troops would be ferried eastward toward the front line. It maps the ports, rivers, railways and roads they would travel, and how they would be supplied and protected on the way.

“Look at the map,” said Tim Stuchtey, head of the nonpartisan Brandenburg Institute for Society and Security. With the Alps forming a natural barrier, North Atlantic Treaty Organization troops would have to cross Germany in case of a clash with Russia, he added, “regardless of where it might start.”

At a higher level, the plan is the clearest manifestation to date of what its authors call an “all-of-society” approach to war. This blurring of the line between the civilian and military realms marks a return to a Cold-War mindset, but updated to account for new threats and hurdles—from Germany’s decrepit infrastructure to inadequate legislation and a smaller military—that didn’t exist at the time.

German officials have said they expect Russia will be ready and willing to attack NATO in 2029. But a string of spying incidents, sabotage attacks and airspace intrusion in Europe, many of them attributed to Moscow by Western intelligence, suggest it could be preparing to pounce sooner.

Analysts also think that a possible armistice in Ukraine, which the U.S. is pushing for this week, could free up time and resources for Russia to prepare a move against NATO members in Europe.

If they succeed in boosting Europe’s resilience, the planners think they cannot just ensure victory, but also make war less likely.


“The goal is to prevent war by making it clear to our enemies that if they attack us, they won’t be successful,” said a senior military officer and one of the earliest authors of the plan, known in military circles as OPLAN DEU.

The magnitude of the shift now required was on display this autumn, somewhere in the east-German countryside.

There, the defense contractor Rheinmetall set up an overnight field camp for 500 soldiers, with dormitories, 48 shower cabins, five gas stations, a field kitchen, drone surveillance and armed guards screened for Russian and Chinese influence. It was built in 14 days and dismantled in seven.

“Picture building a small town from nothing and dismantling it in just a few days,” said Marc Lemmermann, head of sales at Rheinmetall’s logistics business.

Rheinmettall recently signed a €260 million deal to resupply German and NATO troops, part of the military’s efforts to incorporate more of the private sector into the plan.

The autumn operation exposed flaws too: The land couldn’t accommodate all the vehicles, said Lemmermann, and it consisted of noncontiguous plots, forcing Rheinmetall to bus soldiers to and fro. A previous dress rehearsal highlighted the need for a new traffic light at a specific location to alleviate gridlock when military convoys move across the country.

Such lessons are continuously incorporated into OPLAN and its annexes. The document, housed on the military’s air-gapped “red network,” is now in its second iteration.

Some of the biggest obstacles facing Germany’s military planners are intangible: ponderous procurement rules, onerous data protection laws, and other regulations forged in a more peaceful era.

Executing the plan requires rewiring mentalities, erasing almost a generation’s worth of habits.

“We must relearn what we unlearnt,” said Nils Schmid, deputy defense minister. “We have to drag people back from retirement to tell us how we did it back then.”

A troubling accident
A stretch of road on the A44 federal highway between the villages of Steinhausen and Brenken, in western Germany, offers a metaphor for how Europe lowered its guard in the past four decades of peace—and what it would take to raise it again.

Unlike elsewhere on the autobahn, the median strip on this 3.5-mile section isn’t grassy but solid tarmac. The rest areas are unusually large and oddly shaped. There are no overpasses or power cables in sight.

Dozens such sections were built during the Cold War for use as emergency landing strips. Kerosene tanks were buried underneath the parking areas. The guardrails could be unclicked and a mobile air traffic tower set up in minutes.

So-called dual-use infrastructure was the norm in Germany during the Cold War. Much like mandatory conscription meant civilian and military life were intimately connected, highways, bridges, train stations and ports were designed to serve as military assets if needed.

Then the Cold War ended, as did the need for dual-use infrastructure. Tunnels and bridges built after that were often too narrow or flimsy to accommodate convoys. In 2009, Berlin dropped requirements for signs showing the military vehicles roads could support.

Even Cold War-era infrastructure isn’t always usable. Berlin estimates 20% of highways and over a quarter of highway bridges need repairs due to chronic underinvestment. Germany’s North Sea and Baltic Sea harbors need work worth €15 billion, including €3 billion for dual-use upgrades such as dock reinforcements, according to the federation of German seaports.

Such patchiness would limit the military’s freedom of movement in case of war. Chokepoints on the military’s mobility map are among the most closely guarded secrets of the blueprint.


“This is leading to detours, delays and is putting lives at risk,” said Jannik Hartmann, associate fellow at the NATO defense college in Rome and an expert in military mobility.

A recent, little-publicized but consequential incident underlines the problem.

On the night of Feb. 25, 2024, the “Rapida,” a Dutch-flagged cargo ship, rammed a railway bridge over the Hunte river in northwestern Germany, shutting down railway traffic.

Railway operator Deutsche Bahn erected a temporary bridge that opened two months later, only to be rammed by another ship in July, interrupting rail traffic again for another month.

Though they only made the local news, the incidents sent NATO scrambling. The reason: The bridge sat on the sole railway link serving the North Sea port of Nordenham, the only terminal in Northern Europe licensed at the time to handle all munitions shipments to Ukraine.

In neither case did security officials find signs of foul play.

Still, ammunition supplies were choked for weeks and some of the cargo had to be reloaded back onto ships. The top U.S. military command in Europe was forced to move shipments to a Polish port, according to a Department of Defense report to Congress.

“Many ports only have one rail route to the hinterland,” said Holger Banik, CEO of Niedersachsen Ports, which owns several ports in Lower Saxony. “This is a weakness.”

In the short term, improving resilience means making the most of the existing road and rail networks. Longer term, Berlin aims to spend €166 billion by 2029 on infrastructure, including more than €100 billion on the long-neglected railways, and give priority to dual-use infrastructure.

Things go off script
The yearslong effort to make Germany war-ready again began days after Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, when German Chancellor Olaf Scholz unveiled a €100 billion rearmament fund, hailing the decision a zeitenwende, or an “epochal change.”

Later that year, the German military, known as the bundeswehr, created a Territorial Command to lead all homeland operations and tasked its commander, Lieutenant General André Bodemann, a veteran of Kosovo and Afghanistan, with drafting OPLAN.

In a war with Russia, Germany would no longer be a front line state but a staging ground. On top of a degraded infrastructure, it would have to contend with a shrunken military and new threats such as drones.

“Refugees and reinforcements would be pouring in from opposite directions. The flows would need channeling, which the bundeswehr alone can’t do, especially while it’s fighting,” said Claudia Major, head of trans-Atlantic security initiatives at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.

This means the military would need to join with the private sector and civilian organizations on a scale it hadn’t done before.

By March of last year, drawing on feedback from an expanding circle of ministries, government agencies and local authorities, Bodemann’s team had completed the plan‘s first iteration.

The time had come to put it in action.

While the new Merz government was trumpeting a €500 billion defense spending plan and a return to conscription this year, the bundeswehr was working under the radar, briefing hospitals, the police and disaster relief agencies, striking agreements with states and the autobahn operator and drawing transit routes for military convoys.

In late September, a military exercise dubbed Red Storm Bravo took place in the northern city-state of Hamburg to rehearse cooperation between the bundeswehr and the police, firefighters and civil protection units.

The scenario was a miniature OPLAN in action: 500 NATO troops would land in the port to form a convoy of 65 vehicles headed eastward through the city. They would have to fend off attempts to block the port, drone attacks and protests.

Disembarking at sunset amid the scent of overripe bananas wafting from a nearby fruit warehouse, the camouflaged soldiers assembled silently on the dock, helicopters circling overhead. Shortly before midnight, the convoy departed for the city.

FT : Private jet passengers flying to UK face fourfold increase in tax

Private jet passengers flying to UK face fourfold increase in tax
More than 500,000 trips will be subject to higher levies

Private jet passengers flying to the UK face a fourfold tax increase after Rachel Reeves closed a loophole that allowed non-commercial flights to reduce their levies. 

Long-haul private jet travellers can expect to pay £1,141 per flight in charges from 2027, compared with just £253 under the current scheme, after the chancellor expanded the types of aircraft liable for the higher rate of Air Passenger Duty (APD). 

Currently only private aircraft weighing more than 20 tonnes, or those with fewer than 19 seats, pay the higher rate. This means roughly two-thirds of private jet passengers pay only the standard rate of APD — the same as anyone flying on commercial aircraft. 

From April 2027, all private jets over 5.7 tonnes will pay APD at the higher level, the chancellor announced in the Budget document on Wednesday. The move would raise roughly £10mn a year from 2027, the document stated. 

About 194,000 people paid the higher rate last year, according to figures from the Treasury. It forecasts that this will rise to 532,000 under the new scheme — a more than doubling of affected journeys. 

One person who uses private jets said: “I don’t think it was a bad call and I don’t think it’ll put anyone off flying private. The people who use them can afford it and it’s normally charged to businesses anyway.”

APD is split into several bands, depending on the length of the flight, with journeys within the UK facing the lowest level. 

According to consultation documents from last October, the change will lead to charges for private jets flying under 2,000 miles rising from £32 to £142 per passenger in 2027.

For those flying up to 5,500 miles it rises from £244 to £1,097, and for any flying further, it climbs from £253 to £1,141 per person. 

“Private jets provide a bespoke, high-convenience form of travel, often used by wealthier individuals and some businesses,” the Budget document states. “Extending the scope of the higher rate ensures the tax is applied consistently and that those who can afford to fly privately make a fair contribution alongside commercial air passengers.” 

Campaigners had been calling for Reeves to equalise the tax treatment of private jet customers. However, several groups had called for even steeper charges, including higher levels of APD and for private jets to face VAT on their fuel. 

Ben Plowden, head of the Campaign for Better Transport, said: “The chancellor missed a huge opportunity to go further by failing to close the aviation tax loophole which exempts aviation fuel duty and allows private jet passengers to fly VAT free.” 

FT : Online gambling operators hit with steep tax rises

Online gambling operators hit with steep tax rises
High street betting shops and fruit machines spared from tax raid as bingo industry enjoys a cut

Rachel Reeves hit online gambling operators with steep tax rises but spared high street betting shops and fruit machines, sparking some relief for a sector that was braced for the worst ahead of the Budget.

The chancellor said she had targeted her tax rises at the online sector because it is “associated with the highest levels of harm”.

The Office for Budget Responsibility estimated that the additional gambling taxes would raise £1.1bn by the end of this parliament, even as it acknowledged that some of the expected tax yield would be reduced due to “potential substitution to the illicit market”.

The new measures include increasing remote gaming duty, which applies to online casino and roulette games, from 21 per cent to 40 per cent.

Reeves also announced that the levy for remote betting would be raised to 25 per cent from April 2027, while the rate for betting at bricks-and-mortar shops would be held at the current level of 15 per cent. 

The chancellor did not announce any increase in machine games duty, which applies to the flashing machines often found in casinos and bookmakers, defying repeated calls from campaigners, including former prime minister Gordon Brown, to deliver a steep increase.

That move will be a relief to the pub sector. JD Wetherspoon pulled in £73mn — more than 3 per cent of its total revenues — from its fruit machines in the year to July. 

The bingo industry, meanwhile, enjoyed a tax cut, as Reeves said the 10 per cent duty paid by operators would be abolished from next April. 

Miles Baron, chief executive of the Bingo Association, said the move was “transformative” and reflected a “clear recognition of the unique community value we provide”.  

The tax rises on the gambling sector, which were widely expected ahead of Wednesday’s Budget, will not be felt evenly across the market, said Adam Rivers, a managing director at consultancy Alvarez & Marsal.

Companies with larger international revenue streams, or a bigger retail presence, could be in a position to hold their prices lower in order to squeeze the competition.

Pravin Gondhale, an analyst at Barclays, said the new levies had already been partly priced in to stock valuations, paving the way for some market relief on Wednesday.

Shares in Ladbrokes owner Entain closed up 3.4 per cent, Paddy Power owner Flutter rose 2.5 per cent.

Casino operator Rank Group, which owns Mecca Bingo, added 10 per cent, even as it forecast that new taxes and higher staff costs arising from the Budget would cause a £45.5mn hit to profits, despite a £6mn boost from the abolition of bingo duty.

Entain said the new levies would cost an extra £200mn annually, but that it could mitigate about a quarter of the impact by reducing marketing and promotions.

But Evoke, owner of William Hill and 888, was down 18 per cent, with investors wary that the company’s heavy UK exposure and high debt level made it less able to absorb the new measures.

Evoke withdrew its medium-term financial targets as it forecast that, without mitigation, the betting taxes introduced in Reeves’ Budget would increase its costs by around £125mn from 2027.

“We will begin immediately on executing our mitigation plans, which involve a significant reduction in investment into the UK, and, very regrettably, the likely need for thousands of jobs to be cut up and down the country,” said chief executive Per Widerström.

Gambling companies have repeatedly warned that higher taxes will lead to worse odds and push bettors into the illicit market. Grainne Hurst, chief executive of the Betting and Gaming Council, said the tax increases on online gambling were “a massive win for the incredibly harmful, unsafe, unregulated gambling black market”. 

Joanne Whittaker, chief executive of bookmaker Betfred, said UK gamblers were “extremely price-sensitive” and would seek “better value with an offshore operator that isn’t paying the same tax and duties”.

FT : Megadeals hit new record as Wall Street’s animal spirits roar back

Megadeals hit new record as Wall Street’s animal spirits roar back
Global transactions of $10bn or more hit 63 as Trump deregulation and fading trade war risks spur M&A blitz

Transactions of $10bn or more have hit an all-time record in 2025 after Donald Trump’s deregulatory push unleashed Wall Street’s animal spirits and a blitz of global dealmaking.

Naver’s $10.3bn all-stock acquisition of South Korea’s biggest crypto exchange Upbit on Wednesday took this year’s megadeal total to 63, topping the 2015 record, according to LSEG data on transactions since 1988.

The frenzy comes despite a sluggish start to the year after the US president’s “liberation day” tariffs sparked weeks of market volatility and deep uncertainty about interest rates and the global economic outlook.

“Companies are taking advantage of this window to pursue the larger transactions that they’ve long wanted to do and have been expected by the market,” said Ivan Farman, global co-head of mergers and acquisitions at Bank of America.

“When you see big deals being struck in your industry, you don’t want to be left out when the chess pieces move.”

Deals roared back in the second half of 2025 as CEOs pounced on once-in-a-generation transactions, including Union Pacific’s $85bn bid for Norfolk Southern, the $55bn Saudi-backed take-private of Electronic Arts, Anglo American’s $50bn merger with Teck and Kimberly-Clark’s $49bn takeover of Tylenol maker Kenvue.

Edward Lee, a corporate partner at Kirkland & Ellis, said chief executives and boards now had the “confidence and visibility” to chase “big strategic moves that they postponed for two years because of interest-rate uncertainty, inflation and the election”.

The greater visibility would allow deals that were previously hitting regulatory roadblocks to finally get done, Lee added.

The second half of the year deal blitz comes after Trump pulled back from a full-blown trade war with China and choked back some of his most aggressive tariffs, all while doubling down on M&A-friendly measures, including relaxing antitrust rules.

“There’s a feeling right now in the current regulatory environment that there’s a chance to do larger-scale transactions that you may not have the opportunity to do again,” said Krishna Veeraraghavan, co-head of Paul Weiss’s M&A group.

The animal spirits have spread across sectors. Bank M&A surged as deals were approved at the fastest pace in more than three decades, while Big Pharma roared back, acquiring biotech assets to restock their drug pipelines. A boom in artificial intelligence spurred a wave of tech and data centre transactions.

“We’re seeing increased activity not just in tech, driven by a tsunami of money going into AI infrastructure, but also in healthcare, industrials, financial and other sectors,” said Drago Rajkovic, global co-head of M&A at Citigroup.

“Why are there so many large deals? There has been a lot of pent-up demand, a favourable regulatory environment and healthy balance sheets,” he added.

But M&A has been stronger among larger companies than smaller ones, a sign that deal activity remains uneven.

“Small deals are often harder to get done as they’re less interesting to buyers because they don’t move the needle. Fundamentally, smaller deals have lower returns, so there’s a trend towards our clients focusing on large transactions,” said Andrew Woeber, global head of M&A at Barclays.

FT : Fire in Hong Kong apartment complex leaves 44 dead and 279 missing

Fire in Hong Kong apartment complex leaves 44 dead and 279 missing
Hundreds of firefighters working to control blaze in city’s northern Tai Po district


A massive fire that tore through several large apartment buildings in Hong Kong has killed 44 people, while 279 are still missing, the city’s authorities said.

Hundreds of firefighters were working to control the blaze in Hong Kong’s northern Tai Po district on Thursday, with 45 people in hospital in a serious condition.

Police on Thursday said they had arrested three local men on suspicion of manslaughter. The men led the construction company responsible for maintenance of the complex and were aged between 52 and 68.

The fire was detected on Wednesday afternoon in Wang Fuk Court, a residential complex with apartment blocks more than 30 storeys high, before spreading to seven of the estate’s eight towers.

Figures from the Hong Kong Housing Authority show one building in the estate hosts 248 apartments.

The city’s previous deadly blaze of a comparable magnitude was in 1996, when 41 people died in a building fire in Kowloon.

Hong Kong chief executive John Lee called the fire a “massive catastrophe”, adding that firefighters were gradually bringing the blaze under control.

Lee said the government had suspended all publicity campaigns relating to upcoming legislative council elections scheduled to take place on December 7 and would decide in a few days whether to postpone the vote altogether, local media reported.

A livestream video of the estate showed the fire had subsided in intensity by Thursday morning, though flames were visible on most floors. Earlier footage had shown flames coming from the buildings, with many burning from top to bottom.


China’s leader Xi Jinping on Wednesday expressed his condolences for the victims.

Hong Kong’s fire department classified the blaze as a level 5 emergency, its highest risk category and the first one in 17 years.

Andy Yeung, director of the city’s fire services, said officers had discovered styrofoam inside the burning apartments, which made the blaze worse, adding that the number of floors on fire had made the flames more difficult to extinguish, according to local media.

Another fire official said strong winds had also been a factor, blowing parts of the bamboo scaffolding and mesh that had been erected around the buildings for renovations to other blocks in the complex.

On Thursday officials said the fire department had found protective netting, plastic sheeting and waterproof tarpaulins, which they suspected did not meet fire safety standards.