Barron's : Silver Topped Gold In 2025. It’s Copper’s Turn.

Silver Topped Gold In 2025. It’s Copper’s Turn.

Silver gained 140% in 2025. I checked, and that’s not the name of a retro-ironic cryptocurrency spun out from, say, AngryHamsterRugPull or ButtToken. It’s the actual metal from column 11 of the Periodic Table of Elements. That’s a hot column, as it turns out. One space up from silver is copper, up 36%. One down is gold, up 69%.

The whole neighborhood shot higher in 2025, really. One column to the left, platinum jumped 133%, and palladium, used to cut smog in car exhaust, 95%. Two to three columns to the right, aluminum rose 15%, and tin, 49%. And have you seen the price of adamantium and vibranium?

That was a test; those come from Marvel superhero movies. If we’re going to have a chance at keeping up with markets in 2026, we might need to develop a view on some of the transitional metals, or middle-right-of-the-table stuff used in industry, jewelry, and coinage. Throw on a lab coat, spark a Bunsen burner, and stay close to the eyewash station, but hopefully it won’t come to that.

Wall Street categorizes metals as precious, base/industrial, and maybe “other” for the weird ones. There is plenty of overlap. Precious metals include gold and silver, of course, but also palladium, for its rarity, high value, and corrosion resistance, even though demand for it is dominated by the car industry. Base metals are common, reactive, and often useful in manufacturing, like copper, zinc, nickel, and tin.

Uranium is neither precious nor base. Its magic trick is that 0.7% of the element found in nature is fissile. If you can increase that concentration to 3% or 5%, you can fuel a nuclear power plant.

The electricity demands of artificial-intelligence data centers have helped bring nuclear power back into fashion. Uranium gained some 11% in 2025, and is up 168% over the past five years. You can call cobalt a base metal, or stick it with uranium in special metals. It’s used mostly for batteries, including ones for electric vehicles. Cobalt’s price jumped 115% in 2025.

A surge in metal demand can come from a hot economy, supply interruptions, or a technology shift, as with uranium and cobalt. For precious metals, it can come from fears of monetary debasement, or from missing out on gains, or both.

U.S. federal debt is a daunting 115% of gross domestic product. The deficit, or ongoing budget shortfall that is adding to the debt, was $1.8 trillion over the past year, versus $1.4 trillion at the most desperate point of the global financial crisis, in 2009. The U.S. dollar is down 10% in 2025 against a basket of key foreign currencies. The Federal Reserve has been cutting interest rates, even though inflation remains above its target. On the bright side, economic growth has been robust.

This combination has powered gold from $2,068 per troy ounce two years ago to $4,479 recently. A troy ounce is 1/12th of a pound. (For more than you surely want on troy ounces and other gold minutiae, see our cover story from April, back when gold was at $3,406 an ounce: “Gold is Beating Everything. How to Get a Piece of the Action.”) Gold has now beaten the S&P 500 index, not just in 2025, but over the past two decades, 791% to 703%.

There is a lot of metallurgical whataboutism that goes on in commodities forecasting. A Barron’s colleague, Greg Bartalos, argued presciently last February that silver was undervalued based on its ratio to gold. This past week, Ned Davis Research concluded the opposite, that the “gold/silver ratio shows gold oversold with [a] bullish outlook supported by...real interest rate and currency trends.”

Price targets? Take your pick. RBC Capital says gold is headed to $4,800 by the end of 2026. Société Générale says $5,000. Economist Ed Yardeni has a particularly shiny forecast. In his view, gold and the S&P 500, recently 6,934, are following the same trendline. “If the S&P 500 reaches 10,000 by the end of 2029, as we expect, gold should trade at $10,000,” he wrote this past week.

Gold has no earnings or dividends, which makes pegging its fundamental value difficult. One guidepost is the all-in cost of mining the stuff, but we are too far removed from that for it to be much help. RBC reckons the cost will rise from $1,569 an ounce in 2025 to $1,715 in 2026.

That means that gold miners are making preposterous profits. Their returns on invested capital are approaching those of the technology sector. In 2024, gold miner stocks lagged well behind the gold price, but in 2025, they shot ahead of it. So far, the companies have been uncharacteristically prudent with their windfalls, paying down debt and buying back stock rather than spending wildly on takeovers.

If there is a consensus bullish opinion on Wall Street now, it is copper. J.P. Morgan likes it for “acute supply disruptions, fragile ex-U.S. inventories, and renewed Chinese buying,” and says to buy shares of Freeport McMoRan.

UBS agrees, and also likes Anglo American, traded in London, and Teck Resources. Its other favorite metals for 2026 are aluminum, where it recommends shares of Norsk Hydro, and lithium, where it likes Albemarle. For gold, the risk and reward have grown less favorable, but apparently not unfavorable: “No bull market lasts forever, but in our view it is too early to call the top,” writes UBS. There it likes Barrick Mining.

For a scattershot approach, there’s the State Street SPDR S&P Metals & Mining exchange-traded fund, but it’s half in steel and coal, with 16% in gold, 9% in aluminum, and 5% in silver. For more luster, there’s the Invesco DB Precious Metals ETF, but it’s poshly priced, with expenses of 0.79% a year.

Note that crypto lately hasn’t been living up to its billing as digital gold. In 2025, the Nasdaq Crypto Index, which tracks Bitcoin, Ethereum, and less memorable ones, is down 15%.

The Timeshare Industry Pivot (Barrons) (VAC, HGV, TNL, AC FP, MEL SM, VAC FP)

Executive Summary: The Timeshare Industry Pivot

Industry Transformation
  • Rebranding: Shifted from "timeshares" to "vacation ownership" to shed a legacy reputation for being rigid or "scammy."
  • Modernization: Transitioned from fixed-interval weeks to a flexible, points-based system allowing global property swaps.
  • Demographic Shift: The average buyer age has dropped to 39, driven by Millennials seeking long-term travel utility and predictability.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
  • Property Sales: Reached $10.5 billion last year, doubling since the 2020 lows.
  • Occupancy: Hit 80% in 2024, significantly outperforming traditional hotels (mid-60% range).
  • Customer Satisfaction: Reported at 90% via trade group ARDA, supported by high recurring maintenance fee revenue.

Company Valuation Performance/Outlook
Marriott Vacations (VAC) 8x 2026 EPS The "value play." High dividend yield (5.4%) but facing margin and leadership transitions.
Hilton Grand Vacations (HGV) 11x 2026 EPS High growth. Expected 82% earnings jump; focuses on aggressive share buybacks over dividends.
Travel + Leisure (TNL) 10x 2026 EPS Record highs; stable 30%+ margins and unique lifestyle brand partnerships (Margaritaville, Sports Illustrated).

Analysts view the sector similarly to the 1990s casino evolution. By integrating with major hotel brands (Marriott, Hilton, Wyndham), the business model has become a "free cash flow machine" supported by pre-paid vacations and steady recurring fees, making the stocks an attractive alternative to traditional hospitality.

Based on the article's data and current 2025/2026 market projections, the three major players offer different "risk-reward" profiles.
If you are looking for potentiam (potential), the choice depends on whether you prefer a "turnaround play," a "growth engine," or "steady yield."

1. The High-Upside Turnaround: Marriott Vacations (VAC)
Marriott is currently the "hardest to love" but offers the most significant mathematical upside if it corrects its course.
  • The Thesis: It is trading at a deep discount (8x 2026 EPS) due to temporary pain: a CEO transition, property upgrades, and debt concerns (downgraded to B+ by S&P).
  • Potential Catalyst: The appointment of a new CEO and the completion of its "modernization program," which aims to add $150M–$200M in EBITDA by the end of 2026.
  • The Reward: Analysts see a massive "fair value" gap (some projections suggest up to 90% upside if it returns to historical multiples). It also pays the highest dividend (5.4%–5.5%), paying you to wait for the recovery.

2. The Pure Growth Engine: Hilton Grand Vacations (HGV)
Hilton is the choice for investors focused on earnings acceleration and aggressive financial engineering.
  • The Thesis: After absorbing Bluegreen Vacations (expanding its base by 40%), HGV is positioned for a massive earnings "pop." EPS is expected to jump 82% to $4.14 in 2026.
  • Potential Catalyst: Realizing cost synergies from the Bluegreen merger and the success of "HGV Max" (their premium tier).
  • The Reward: It has the highest analyst "Buy" conviction. While it doesn't pay a dividend, management is aggressively buying back shares ($150M last quarter), which boosts the value of remaining shares.

3. The High-Quality Compounder: Travel + Leisure (TNL)
TNL is the "safest" bet with the most diversified business model.
  • The Thesis: Unlike the others, TNL owns RCI (the world’s largest exchange network), which provides a high-margin, stable fee stream even if new sales slow down.
  • Potential Catalyst: Expansion into "lifestyle" brands like Margaritaville and Sports Illustrated Resorts, which appeal to the younger (average age 39) buyer demographic.
  • The Reward: It offers a balanced mix of growth and income (3.1% dividend) and has been the best performer over the last five years (+75%). It is the "institutional favorite," with 87% of shares held by large funds.

Summary Table: Which one for you?
Goal Stock Why?
Value / Reversal VAC Deeply undervalued; high dividend; new leadership coming.
Aggressive Growth HGV Massive EPS growth forecast for 2026; heavy buybacks.
Stability / Quality TNL Diversified revenue (RCI); consistent 30% margins.


1. Marriott Vacations Worldwide (VAC)
  • Current Price (Approx): $58.50
  • Average 12-Month Target:$64.00 (~9% Upside)
  • High/Low Targets: $93.00 / $37.00
  • Analyst Consensus:Hold (Recent downgrades from Mizuho and Goldman Sachs due to lower margin guidance).
  • Potentiam: This is the contrarian play. While the consensus is "Hold," the high-end targets suggest a nearly 60% return if the new CEO can successfully integrate recent acquisitions and normalize margins.

2. Hilton Grand Vacations (HGV)
  • Current Price (Approx): $45.20
  • Average 12-Month Target:$56.50 (~25% Upside)
  • High/Low Targets: $76.00 / $39.00
  • Analyst Consensus:Buy (Strong conviction from Truist and Mizuho).
  • Potentiam: Analysts expect a massive recovery in EPS by 2026. Truist recently adjusted their target to $59.00, citing the industry’s "cleaning up" of its reputation and the power of the Hilton brand name. It has the highest "average" upside of the three.

3. Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL)
  • Current Price (Approx): $72.50
  • Average 12-Month Target:$74.90 (~3% Upside)
  • High/Low Targets: $90.30 / $63.00
  • Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy / Outperform (Upgraded by Barclays in Dec 2025).
  • Potentiam: While the "average" target is close to the current price, TNL is at all-time highs. High-end targets ($90+) imply a further 24% gain. It is viewed as the "market leader" with the best cash flow profile and the lowest risk.

Investment Summary Table
Stock Ticker Dividend Potential (High Target) Key Catalyst
Marriott VAC 5.4% +59% CEO Appointment & Margin Recovery
Hilton HGV 0% +68% EPS "Pop" in 2026 / Share Buybacks
Travel + Leisure TNL 3.1% +24% Lifestyle Brand (Margaritaville) Success
Analyst Note: The Potential in this sector currently lies in HGV for raw growth and VAC for a deep-value turnaround. TNL is the "steady compounder" for those who want lower volatility.

European Sector Summary: The "Big Three" Comparison
Stock Role in Portfolio 2026 Target / Potential Key 2025/26 Milestone
Accor (AC.PA) The Sector Titan €54 - €60 (+15%) Massive share buybacks (€440M) and Luxury/Lifestyle RevPAR growth of 7%+.
Meliá (MEL.MC) The Value Play €9.30 - €11.00 (+20%+) Dominating the "Asset-Right" resort model; 11/12 analysts rate as "Strong Buy."
P&V (VAC.PA) The Turnaround €2.25 - €2.30 (+25%+) Reached Net Cash position; 2030 EBITDA target of €270M is the main rerating trigger.

The "Read-Across" Winner: Pierre & Vacances (VAC.PA)
Based on its December 2025 results, P&V is the purest example of the "Timeshare Comeback" logic applied to Europe:
  • Financial Cleanup: It has moved from a decade of losses to Net Cash (+€45M) and its second consecutive year of net profit (€41M).
  • The "Premium" Effect: Much like the US shift to "Vacation Ownership," P&V has renovated 100% of its Center Parcs domains. This has pushed 62% of its units into the Premium/VIP category, driving a +35% increase in RevPAR (Revenue Per Available Room).
  • Strategic Trigger: Management has confirmed an EBITDA target of €185M for 2026. Even with a temporary tax headwind in the Netherlands (Dutch VAT), the company is maintaining its 2030 goal of €270M EBITDA, which analysts say could justify a 40%+ rerating from current levels.

The "Safety" Play: Accor (AC.PA)
If you want the stability of the big US brands (Marriott/Hilton), Accor is the European equivalent.
  • Lifestyle Dominance: Its "Luxury & Lifestyle" division is growing 3x faster than its budget brands.
  • Capital Return: Unlike the turnaround names, Accor is returning cash directly to you through a €440M share buyback and an increased dividend of €1.26.

The "Mediterranean" Alpha: Meliá (MEL.MC)
  • Occupancy Lead: Occupancy is normalizing at high levels with "no signs of a slowdown" despite macro jitters.
  • Institutional Backing: With an average price target of €9.33, it has the strongest "unanimous" support from Wall Street analysts among the European hotel groups.

Barron's : Timeshares Have Made a Comeback. Can Their Stocks?

Timeshares Have Made a Comeback. Can Their Stocks?
Once tarred as an unwise investment at best, fractional ownership has a new set of fans.

Like other vacationers, timeshare owners are looking to get away from it all—including the business’ poor reputation. An industry revival is helping them do just that.

Count Carol Lilienfeld among the fans. After a 2018 operation, she got the best kind of prescription: Her doctor told her she had to take long weekends away to lower her stress. As a timeshare owner, she could follow that advice easily, without adding much to her budget.

Timeshares aren’t perfect. Lilienfeld has sometimes run into hassles booking trips, and as an attorney, she’s well aware that timeshares aren’t good estate planning tools, as they’re sometimes advertised. Yet she’s still been an owner for about two decades. “For the most part, I’ve been happy with them,” she says.

She isn’t the only one. Some 10 million households own timeshares, and report a 90% satisfaction rate, according to the latest data from the trade group American Resort Development Association, known as ARDA. Average occupancy hit a postpandemic high of 80% in 2024, well ahead of the hotel occupancy rate in the mid-60% range, while rental revenue has ballooned by $1 billion since 2021, reaching a record $3.2 billion last year.

Just don’t call them timeshares. Once tarred with the idea that these arrangements are unwise investment at best, and a scam at worst, vacation ownership, as it has been rebranded, counted $10.5 billion in property sales last year—a near-record level and more than double the 2020 low of $4.9 billion. That growth reflects a sea change in how and where these accommodations are used—and by whom—and a potential boon for the stocks related to them.

“If you go back 30 or 40 years it had a pretty dicey reputation,” says Truist analyst C. Patrick Scholes. “What happened especially for the publicly traded companies, was the Wall Street-ification of the timeshare business.”

Scholes likens it to the transition the casino industry went through in the 1990s, when companies left behind their seedier roots and modernized their businesses to appeal to investors. “That doesn’t mean it can’t be an aggressively pushed product, but it’s become more mainstream, and the industry has definitely cleaned itself up in the past 20 years,” he says.

Part of that push happened because the world’s biggest hospitality brands got involved. Although they are separate publicly traded companies, it’s easy to see why Marriott International has a vested interest in making sure timeshare operator Marriott Vacations Worldwide has high standards and satisfaction rates. A similar story holds for Hilton Hotels and Hilton Grand Vacations. After a 2021 merger and rebrand, Travel + Leisure now owns Club Wyndham and WorldMark by Wyndham, which are connected to Wyndham Hotels & Resorts through Wyndham Rewards.


Today’s guests are happier because they have more options. The old fixed-interval model required owners to visit the same location and stay in the same unit for the same dates every year, a Groundhog Day-style system that wasn’t very popular. It now uses a much more flexible, points-based system that allows owners to visit properties worldwide, whenever they want, from Boston to Bali and Bhutan. “The industry has evolved and gotten more user friendly,” says Deutsche Bank analyst Chris Woronka.

Moreover, as ARDA notes, some timeshare companies allow members to use their points—the currency of the vacation ownership world, akin to airline miles—for other accommodations, like traditional hotels and cruises, as well as activities like golf and spa trips.

The industry used to have a stodgy reputation, dating from its early days when it catered to oldsters, but that is not the reality today: The average age of a recent timeshare purchaser is 39, and the average age of all timeshare owners is 45.

Some of those may have inherited them from their parents, but Woronka says it’s easy to see why millennials are seeking them out on their own: “The economics suggest that the sooner you buy a timeshare, the more utility it has. So if you think you’ll be able to travel fairly regularly until you’re 75 or 80 years old, you’re better off buying in your 30s.”

The companies themselves have an appealing business model. Annual fees include things like taxes, daily operations, and regular property renovations—and provide a steady recurring revenue stream. Regular payments that count toward ownership incentivize travelers to prioritize staying with the brand when they travel and to travel more frequently, given they have already prepaid for a good portion of the trip.

“Our owners are vacationing largely with dollars they spent five to 10 years ago,” says Travel + Leisure CEO Michael Brown. “So the question becomes not ‘do I want to go,’ but ‘where do I want to travel.’”

The three publicly traded companies—Marriott Vacations Worldwide, Hilton Grand Vacations, and Travel + Leisure—have been on very different journeys in recent years. Marriott did well after its spinoff from Marriott International in 2011, but has lost half of its value in the past five years. Hilton has risen 50% over the same period, while Travel + Leisure has climbed 75%. The S&P 500 is up 86% over the same period.

“All three of these are in a very good space, trade below market multiples, and throw off a lot of free cash,” says Woronka. Even with Marriott’s recent troubles—attributable to a number of likely temporary issues like acquisition integration hiccups and the need to upgrade properties—the company is “still throwing off a couple hundred million in free cash flow this year.”


Marriott is the hardest to love, but also the cheapest to buy. With the company’s earnings per share expected to grow 3.4% next year to $6.95, it trades at just eight times 2026 projected EPS. The company is on the hunt for a new chief executive officer, whose job it will be to boost the lowest gross margins of the group—and that appointment could be a catalyst for the shares. Marriott is also actively buying back its stock, and sports a hefty 5.4% dividend yield.

Hilton changes hands for 11 times 2026 earnings, with gross margins above 50% in recent years, and is expected to see earnings jump 82%, to $4.14, after two years of weaker earnings growth. It, alone among the three, doesn’t pay a dividend but bought back $150 million of its shares in the most recent quarter.

Travel + Leisure recently hit record highs but still trades at 10 times 2026 earnings, and has sustained gross margins in the mid-30% range. It, too, is an active share repurchaser and has a 3.1% dividend yield. In addition, it has a host of new specialty-themed projects, including Margaritaville Vacation Club resorts, Sports Illustrated Resorts locations announced in Nashville and Chicago, and the launch of the Eddie Bauer Adventure Club partnership with Authentic Brands Group. “Consumers are increasingly prioritizing experiential travel and destination-based vacations they can engage with, which aligns well with our strategy,” Brown told Barron’s.

Scholes has Buy ratings on all three stocks. But he isn’t just a timeshare bull; he’s also an owner. After years of dealing with the inconsistencies of Airbnb on his family vacations—culminating in a malfunctioning bathroom on New Year’s Eve at a rental whose property manager’s phone went straight to voice mail—he decided to take the plunge.

“I follow this space but I never thought about it until that moment,” he says. Scholes doesn’t treat it as an investment, but after doing the math, it was clear a timeshare would be the most cost-effective long-term option. “It turned out to be a great deal for me, and I’m happy with it.”

More and more travelers—and investors—agree.

>>> Weekend Papers Summary

FINANCIAL TIMES
-Government borrowing costs for Italy and Spain have dropped to a 16-year low relative to Germany, with the extra yield on 10-year Italian debt narrowing to within 0.7 percentage points of German Bunds. Similarly, strong economic growth has reduced Spain's 10-year spread with Germany to under 0.5 percentage points, the lowest since before the Eurozone crisis. Ales Koutny of Vanguard noted a convergence in investor perceptions between peripheral nations and those previously viewed as safer such as France or Belgium.
-Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky will meet Donald Trump at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida over the weekend. This meeting follows weeks of diplomacy regarding a US peace proposal involving a 28-point plan created with Russian officials. Zelensky mentioned a broad agenda for their discussions, aimed at finalizing aspects of the peace plan. However, Trump emphasized that Zelensky's 20-point plan requires his approval to proceed, expressing cautious optimism about the meeting and indicating future discussions with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
-Saudi Arabia has attacked the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council (STC) in Yemen, highlighting growing tensions between Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The STC expressed serious concern over the strikes targeting its elite forces in Hadhramawt province. This military action follows the STC's offensive to seize control of Hadhramaut, which is crucial to Saudi interests due to its wealth and strategic significance. Analysts suggest that the STC's aggression was likely supported by the UAE. The situation reflects the deteriorating relationship between the two Gulf nations, who have been at odds over regional conflicts.
-On the evening of Christmas Day, residents of Jabo, a Muslim village in the state of Sokoto, Nigeria, reported seeing a small aircraft followed by a loud explosion and a fireball. This incident was part of a US military operation targeting ISIS in Northwest Nigeria, described by President Trump as a successful strike. While the US claimed multiple ISIS members were killed, Jabo residents expressed surprise, noting that no injuries occurred and that the munitions landed in empty fields. Major General Samaila Uba confirmed the Nigerian military's collaboration with the US, emphasizing that the strike was based on credible intelligence and planning.
-China's industrial profits fell 13.1% in November, marking the fastest drop in over a year, as reported by the National Bureau of Statistics. This decline contrasts sharply with a smaller 5.5% decrease in October and reduces year-to-date profit growth to just 0.1% over the previous year, down from 1.9% earlier in the year. The economy continues to grapple with challenges such as industrial overcapacity, weak consumer confidence, and ongoing deflationary pressures, compounded by a struggling property sector now in crisis for five years. Despite improvements in high-tech manufacturing exports and a temporary easing in the US-China trade tensions, the data underscores the difficulty for policymakers in restoring confidence among businesses and consumers.
-Thailand and Cambodia have agreed to a ceasefire effective from noon Saturday after renewed border conflicts resulted in numerous casualties and significant displacement. Both nations pledged to refrain from troop movements and provocative actions, allowing current troop levels to remain. Thailand will return 18 captured Cambodian soldiers as part of the agreement. On Thursday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio communicated with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet, emphasizing the commitment to peace and the implementation of the ‘Trump brokered’ Kuala Lumpur Peace Accords.
-Data center developers are increasingly relying on aircraft derived jet engines and fossil fuel generators due to supply chain shortages and lengthy grid connection delays, which hinder the adoption of cleaner energy options. With wait times extending to seven years for grid access, on-site energy solutions like aeroderivative turbines and diesel generators have seen rising demand. These technologies enable data centers to power AI operations independently of the grid. GE Vernova is providing aeroderivative turbines to Crusoe, aimed at generating nearly 1 gigawatt of power for major clients such OpenAI and Oracle.
NEW YORK TIMES
-Richard Grenell, president of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, has sent a letter threatening litigation against musician Chuck Redd for canceling an annual Christmas Eve jazz concert. Redd canceled the concert in protest of the center's new name, the Trump-Kennedy Center, following a board vote by members appointed by President Trump. Grenell accused Redd of using "sad bullying tactics" in his protest against the name change, which Redd has hosted for nearly two decades.
-The California High-Speed Rail Authority has dropped its lawsuit against the Trump administration over the termination of $4B in federal grants for the state's high-speed rail project, opting instead to pursue private investment. Attorney General Rob Bonta of California filed a notice of dismissal on Tuesday, ending the federal lawsuit that the state had brought in July in the Eastern District of California. The Transportation Department said a compliance review found that California had failed to meet federal grant requirements, citing costly changes to contracts, lowered ridership forecasts and missed deadlines.
-Russia launched heavy missile and drone attacks, coinciding with Ukrainian President Zelensky's planned meeting with President Trump to discuss peace. Zelensky criticized Russia's willingness for peace, stating that their continued military actions reveal their true intentions to prolong the conflict and amplify Ukraine's suffering.
-Residents of Wang Fuk Court estate had repeatedly expressed concerns to Hong Kong officials regarding a renovation project they deemed hazardous. They alleged that the government-sanctioned repairs on the aging towers involved overpriced, substandard work using flammable materials due to corrupt influences. Complaints targeted the owners' board and construction firms, hinting at political collusion. Despite inspections and notices issued to contractors, authorities provided inconsistent responses, with one official downplaying the fire risk associated with the renovation.
-A ship carrying nearly 40 researchers from four continents has embarked from New Zealand to study Antarctica's rapidly melting glaciers. The expedition, which will last a month, emphasizes the challenging conditions of the frozen continent, where harsh weather limits daily research activities. Despite these difficulties, the allure of Antarctica lies in uncovering its complex, alien environment.
-Australia's recent decision to ban children under 16 from using social media has sparked global discussions among parents about similar measures in their own countries. In Australia, surveys indicate strong parental support for the new rules, even as teenagers are exploring VPNs to circumvent them. Several countries are considering similar actions; Malaysia plans to implement restrictions starting in 2026, while Denmark is set to block users under 15 next year, allowing parental consent for children as young as 13. In the USA, various states have enacted laws aimed at limiting children's access to social media with parental consent requirements.
-Some 50% of Myanmar’s population lives in poverty according to the UNDP. Foreign investment has drastically decreased, leaving cities like Yangon marked by incomplete construction projects. The military junta, in an effort to gain legitimacy and lift international sanctions, announced three election rounds from December to January. However, the elections, the first since the 2021 coup, are widely regarded as a façade, especially after the disbandment of the National League for Democracy and the continued imprisonment of its leaders, including Aung San Suu Kyi. Voting is also restricted in over half the country due to ongoing armed resistance against the junta, which has resorted to bombing civilians in response.
NEW YORK POST
-Thursday's strikes against ISIS targets in Nigeria indicate a heightened American commitment to combat jihadist growth in Africa. ISIS has established a significant presence in northeastern Nigeria and the tri-border region of Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso. In the eastern regions, including Somalia, Mozambique, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, ISIS poses a severe threat, with previous US special forces operations aimed at counterterrorism. Successful operations rely on local cooperation, as demonstrated by the recent coordination with Nigerian authorities. Nigeria's government has faced challenges in safeguarding Christians and addressing the threats posed by Boko Haram and ISIS. Counterterrorism strategies in Africa must also address the risks presented by Al Qaeda's various affiliates across the continent.
-Americans have been cutting their end-of-year charitable donations due to economic challenges such as high living costs, inflation, and rising unemployment, as indicated by an AP-NORC poll. Approximately half of the related respondents have already decreased their charity contributions for 2025, with only 24% planning to donate before the year's end. December is critical for charities, with nearly one-third of annual giving occurring in this month. Despite varied causes to support, lower-income households are particularly affected, limiting their ability to contribute. Many families, like that of Oakley Graham from Missouri, report tightening their budgets significantly.

Barron's : Salesforce Is Ready to Emerge an AI Winner. Buy the Stock.

Salesforce Is Ready to Emerge an AI Winner. Buy the Stock.
The company has unfairly received the label of AI loser. That should change, and soon.

Key Points
Salesforce’s annual recurring revenue from Agentforce grew 330% year over year in the fiscal third quarter, reaching $540 million.
Salesforce’s profit margins have improved by more than 15 percentage points from 2021 lows, reaching 33% this year.
Calendar year 2026 sales are expected to rise about 11% over 2025 levels, exceeding 2025’s expected 10% growth.

Software, which was once eating the world, has caught a stomach bug—and Salesforce “AI virus” has investors sweating. The stock can rally as artificial-intelligence fears fade and management demonstrates commitment to improving profitability.

The software sector, once a stalwart on Wall Street, has been whipsawed over the past few years. A post-Covid boom in digitization ran into an interest-rate-hiking cycle that crushed valuations in 2022. Then, ChatGPT entered investors’ consciousness. Now, investors are in “constant debate over AI winners and losers,” says BTIG analyst Nick Altman.

From 2009 to 2019, software stocks in the S&P 500 returned almost 20% annually. Returns were double that from the end of 2019 to the end of 2021, before software shares cratered 30% in 2022. The sector has bounced back since then, but performance has diverged. Among the winners is Palantir Technologies, which has returned more than 200% annually for the past three years. Salesforce stock has lost about 20% a year over that span.

Salesforce has been deemed an AI loser. A year ago, shares of the San Francisco–based enterprise software company traded at $369 per share, making the company worth approximately $350 billion, or nine times estimated 2025 sales. The stock is now almost 30% from all-time highs, and trading at under six times estimated 2026 sales.

At issue: Salesforce’s Agentforce platform, which makes use of AI agents to perform various sales, service, and marketing tasks. “The debate on CRM’s execution with Agentforce will likely continue in the years ahead,” says BTIG’s Allan Verkhovski, who rates Salesforce stock Buy, with a $335 price target. Still, “the current valuation suggests to us that some investors are pricing in CRM’s demise.”

That is too bearish. Expectations for AI-related revenue are about as low as they can get, especially now that Agentforce is gaining traction. The annual recurring revenue from Agentforce grew 330% year over year in the company’s fiscal third quarter, to $540 million. More than half of new Agentforce bookings came from existing customers, versus just over 40% in the second quarter.

AI-related revenue, while growing, is still a sliver of the projected calendar year 2026 sales of almost $46 billion. More important, calendar year 2026 sales are expected to rise about 11% over 2025 levels, an acceleration from 2025’s expected 10% growth—and well above the lowest growth since the pandemic of about 9% in 2024. Growth looks like it has bottomed.

That call emanates from Salesforce’s current remaining performance obligation, or CRPO, the revenue booked for the next 12 months. Management guided for CRPO to grow 9% organically in the current quarter, and Chief Financial Officer Robin Washington said she expects that to support revenue growth acceleration.

With that backdrop, trading at eight to 10 times sales “makes economic sense” for a software company, says Oakmark Funds portfolio manager Bill Nygren, who adds, “Not too crazy a number.”

Other might not agree, but they should recall the rule of 40 in software. Top-line growth and profit margins should sum to 40, helping a software stock reach a “normal” valuation. Currently, S&P 500 software stocks trade for nine times estimated sales for the coming 12 months.

Salesforce violated the rule of 40 for much of 2025 and was punished by investors. Nygren says CEO Marc Benioff’s “track record at growth value has been fantastic,” adding that Benioff is more concerned about profitable growth these days.


Salesforce’s profit margins have improved by more than 15 percentage points from 2021 lows, to 33% this year. As long as margins keep improving, Salesforce could achieve the rule of 40 by simply by meeting revenue growth expectations.

If that happens, investors will forget all about Salesforce’s artificial-intelligence woes. “In 2025, AI doubters obsessed about the monetization of AI,” says Daniel Newman, CEO of technology research firm Futurum. He expects that “obsession” to fade in 2026 as revenue growth accelerates and more companies adopt AI tools from existing players.

Increased adoption requires customers to see that AI agents create higher efficiency not only in theory, but in reality. Stifel analyst Brad Reback writes that he expects customers to “move from proof of concept to production with agents.”

If that spurs faster growth, shares can return to eight times estimated calendar year 2026 sales. That implies a share price of about $390, up 50% from recent levels.

The immediate risk: Salesforce misses current estimates. Even if growth remains the same, that would likely be insufficient for the market. In the long term, AI trends outside the company’s purview could replace Salesforce’s own agents. But as long as management continues to improve its product’s effectiveness, that risk will fade.

Sizable gains don’t require Herculean assumptions, just basic business execution. That feels like a smart bet heading into a new year that will surely bring more AI drama.

THE TECHNICAL VIEW
Salesforce is having a weak 2025, down 21% year to date. But its chart is beginning to suggest that 2026 could look more constructive. Shares have held on to the entire 13% advance from the first week of December, their first double-digit weekly gain in two years. CRM now trades above the 200-day simple moving average for the first time since early March. The stock has formed a bull-flag pattern, and a breakout above the $265 pivot would imply a measured move toward $310. That level could be reached by mid-2026. The bullish thesis remains intact as long as shares hold above $252.—Doug Busch

THE QUANTITATIVE VIEW
Bottom Line: Salesforce remains a high-quality, profitable, growing cloud franchise, now trading at a more reasonable multiple after a period of underperformance. The fundamental story (growth + margin expansion) is intact, but near-term sentiment has cooled and the stock lacks technical support, so returns from here will depend mainly on continued earnings delivery.
Bias: Buy/Accumulate on a multiyear view for investors seeking core large-cap software exposure; tactically neutral for momentum or revision-driven strategies until the technical and estimate trends improve.
Overall: Strong fundamental profile but not aligned with the current macro regime. Best viewed as a long-term secular compounder rather than a short-term macro or factor-timing vehicle right now. —Vestmo

Barron's : These ‘Quality’ Stocks Are Trading at a 40% Discount to the Market. A

These ‘Quality’ Stocks Are Trading at a 40% Discount to the Market. Act Now.
The rally in low-quality names is bound to end in 2026. The S&P 500 isn’t cheap, either.

Key Points
  • The S&P 500 index has returned 18% so far, with low-quality stocks outperforming high-quality ones by 50 percentage points since March.
  • Defining “quality stocks” is challenging, and many popular quality funds hold expensive shares, like the iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) at 26 times estimated 2025 earnings.
  • Free cash flow-based metrics are suggested for identifying quality stocks, with a basket of such stocks historically returning 15% to 16% annually, 5 percentage points better than the S&P 500.

“We’re incautiously optimistic—buy hot garbage,” advised none of the big investment firms a year ago in their 2025 outlooks. Pity. The S&P 500 index, despite a springtime tariff wobble, has so far returned a splashy 18%. And since the beginning of March, speculative, low-quality stocks have beaten high-quality ones by 50 percentage points, UBS finds. It predicts 10% more upside for the U.S. market in 2026, but says that investors should now bet on high quality: “The sharp rally in low quality appears unsustainable amid elevated uncertainty and extreme crowding.”

Quality sounds intuitively appealing to any shopper, from car-lot tire kickers to produce-aisle melon sniffers. For investors, high-quality companies bring to mind financial resilience—just the thing today to offset concerns over runaway artificial-intelligence spending, or a recent rash of flaky business models, like companies that raise cash to hoard crypto. If UBS is right that quality stocks are statistically due for a bounce, all the better.

There are only two problems. First, there is no widespread agreement on how to define quality stocks, so funds with “quality” in the name can vary widely in their approach. Second, the most popular of these funds currently hold pricey shares. For example, the iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor exchange-traded fund, ticker QUAL, trades at 26 times estimated 2025 earnings.

Investors who use a better approach can find quality stocks trading at discounts of 40% or more to the market. Some ETFs and seven stock picks in a moment.


The broad stock market isn’t cheap. The S&P 500 goes for 25 times earnings, versus just under 18 times earnings, on average, over the past two decades. So, it’s understandable if the iShares quality ETF, QUAL, goes for a little more, but it’s a bigger turnoff that it does so after having underperformed since its launch in 2013. Also, its top holdings include many of the same giants that dominate the S&P 500, like Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Meta Platforms. If the purpose of buying a quality fund is to diversify against a core S&P 500 position, that might not be ideal.

To find a better approach, let’s first dig into some of the metrics that funds use to separate high-quality stocks from the rest. The most common of these is called return on equity. That’s a year’s worth of a company’s earnings divided by the net accounting value of the things it owns. In simplest terms, ROE answers the question: How much money does this company make relative to its stuff? In not-quite-as-simple terms, well…

At Virginia Tech University, there is a building formerly called Graduate Life Center at Donaldson Brown, or informally, DB. It’s named for an electrical engineering alum who landed a job in 1909 selling explosives for the E.I. du Pont de Nemours Powder Company, and eventually worked his way up to treasurer. One of Brown’s financial innovations, today called DuPont analysis, involves breaking ROE down into its constituent factors to tell why it is high or low. Try jotting down three fractions separated by multiplication signs: earnings/sales x sales/assets x assets/equity. Recall from grade school fraction math that you may cancel diagonally; the two “sales” disappear, as do the “assets.” What’s left is earnings over equity, or ROE. If it’s too low, try to improve your profit margins (earnings/sales), or bring in more business using less stuff (sales/assets). Or, somewhat less ideally, maybe throw on some leverage (assets/equity).

You can see where this last factor, leverage, might unduly flatter the ROE of overborrowers. Some indexes that select for high ROEs will separately look for low leverage. QUAL does both of these things, plus it favors high earnings stability.

There are many variations in other quality funds. Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF, or SPHQ, tracks stocks chosen for ROE, leverage, and something called the accruals ratio. It measures how much of a company’s earnings come from noncash accounting adjustments. The accrual ratio is sometimes called the Sloan ratio, after an accounting professor named Richard Sloan, whose research showed that companies with cleaner earnings generally produce superior stock returns. (He is no relation to famed General Motors head Alfred P. Sloan, who, as it happens, brought in DuPont’s explosives-man-turned-treasurer to help blow up inefficiencies.)

Fidelity Quality Factor ETF, or FQAL, weights three measures equally. One is return on invested capital, or ROIC, a cousin of ROE that’s harsher on heavy borrowers. The others are free-cash-flow margin and free-cash-flow stability—more on free cash flow in just a moment. Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF, or JOET, favors shares that are running higher. JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF, JQUA, says only that it looks for “profitability, quality of earnings, and solvency.” And so on.

This is a strange business. An investor seeking Japanese stocks, or utilities, or high dividend yields, can find ETFs filled with exactly those things. But one who orders up quality stocks might be served a choice of two ETFs as far apart as mashed potatoes and marshmallows. Which method is best?

Jared Woodard, head of the Research Investment Committee at Bank of America, has studied the factors used to screen for quality stocks and finds that ones based on free cash flow produce the best results. Casual investors tend to focus on earnings and are often less familiar with free cash flow, which is ironic. Of the two measures, free cash flow is by far the simpler. Picture a mom-and-pop store with an old cigar box for a till. Customer money goes in. Store costs come out. What’s left at the end of the day or week is free cash flow.

Earnings, on the other hand, are designed to tell a tidy story. If a company spends $50 billion this year to build and fill hyperscale AI data centers, it doesn’t subtract that money from earnings right away. It calls it a capital investment, and deducts it from earnings little by little. Just how many years it should stretch out those deductions can be, and is now in the case of AI computing power, the subject of some debate. Think of free cash flow as earnings stripped of storytelling and excuses. When free cash flow is divided by the enterprise value of a company—the cost to buy all of a company’s shares and pay off its debt while using its available cash—the resulting free cash yield can be a powerful signal of quality.

“Historically, investing in a basket of stocks that score well on this measure…has performed about 15%, 16% total returns a year since the early ’90s,” says BofA’s Woodard. “That’s about five percentage points a year better than the S&P 500, which has already by itself been a pretty good place to invest.”


Unsurprisingly, some of the names turn up in both the QUAL and VFLO quality ETFs, like Merck. It has the world’s best-selling drug, called Keytruda, which helps the immune system attack cancer cells, and launched more than a decade ago. That means the company faces key patent expirations starting in 2028. But Wells Fargo Securities upgraded the stock to Overweight in November based on a bright growth outlook into the 2030s. Merck has directed its considerable free cash flow toward recent acquisitions to offset future Keytruda declines, and its development pipeline will yield a string of key trial readouts over the next 18 months.

Last Christmas, Brent crude went for $73 a barrel. Now, it’s about $10 cheaper. Yet Chevron stock has managed to produce a small gain this year. UBS calls the company the best-in-class upstream player, or producer, following a legal battle with Exxon Mobil and takeover of Hess that brought vast reserves in Guyana. At a $70 average Brent price, UBS estimates that free cash flow could grow by 10% annually over the next five years.

Expedia Group scores well on free cash generation and growth, and poorly on popularity, with barely a third of analysts who cover the stock recommending a purchase. The company is small relative to Priceline owner Booking Holdings, especially in hotels, which are much more lucrative than flights and rental cars. But Expedia, under new management since last year, solidly beat quarterly bookings estimates in early November, sending its stock 18% higher in a day.

Deckers Outdoor is best known as the maker of Ugg boots, even though sales there are likely to be overtaken in the coming year by the company’s Hoka brand of pillowy running shoes. The stock has slipped on a banana peel this year, losing half of its value. Growth rates for Hoka have slowed from 50%-plus a few years ago, to 20%-plus over the past two years, and now, to low-teens percentages. In mid-November, investment bank Stifel upgraded the stock to Buy from Hold, citing management meetings that boosted confidence in Decker’s long-term ability to increase Hoka sales at low-double digit percentages, and Ugg at low to mid-single digit ones.

Longtime dog AT&T turned things around by getting out of show business and satellite dishes, and focusing its free cash on paying down debt, shoring up its dividend, and rolling out more fiber broadband to compete with cable. The stock has beaten the market over the past two years. A selloff since September on competitive concerns in wireless offers bargain hunters another look. KeyBanc Capital Markets upgraded the stock to Overweight from Sector Weight in November, calling wireless challenges overblown, and AT&T a leader in convergence, or the bundling of fiber broadband and wireless service, which tends to help with both profit margins and customer turnover. The dividend yield is 4.6%.

General Motors stock is doing something highly uncharacteristic: beating the stock market. Investors have made 135% over the past two years. Electric-vehicle demand has skidded, and tax perks have been scrapped. By keeping its EV bets modest, GM has avoided taking a massive loss like its rival Ford Motor recently did. Morgan Stanley upgraded GM stock to Overweight from Equal Weight in December, citing increased focus on lucrative fuel-burning vehicles. Shares go for eight times projected 2025 earnings, and earnings are expected to grow by 15% a year over the next two years.

Omnicom Group stock has underperformed the U.S. market by 50 points over the past two years on concerns over advertising demand and the rising industry presence of Amazon.com and other digital giants. In November, Omnicom bought Interpublic Group, creating the world’s largest holding company of ad agencies. Expect layoffs, reduced real estate, and other cost-cutting. By 2027, UBS predicts $1 billion in yearly savings, higher profit margins, and $2 billion in stock buybacks, leading to earnings per share of $11.35, up from just over $8 last year. Shares traded recently at seven times the higher figure—a tempting pitch from an industry known for them.