FT : Investors join opposition to SEC stock market reforms

Investors join opposition to SEC stock market reforms
Fund managers doubt retail traders will benefit from changes aimed at improving transparency and pricing

Several big investors have joined opposition to an ambitious stock market overhaul proposed by US regulators to improve transparency and pricing for smaller retail traders.

The criticisms point to deep concern about elements of plans published in December by the Securities and Exchange Commission and promoted by chair Gary Gensler which amount to the biggest reform of equity trading in two decades.

The regulator’s focus on the innards of stock trading follows the explosion in consumer interest during pandemic lockdowns. That produced the 2021 “meme stock” frenzy which collapsed in acrimony after overwhelmed brokers limited trading in several companies.

The SEC’s proposals to increase the data brokers publish and to shrink trading increments has gathered some support, albeit with suggested changes. The increments or “tick size” rule would allow stock prices to move up and down by less than a penny and in theory would improve pricing for the most in-demand stocks.

But more controversial is a plan to introduce its own “best execution” regime — mandating brokers to make all efforts to find the best price for investors — on top of similar standards that are already in place.

The SEC also wants to force brokers to auction retail investor orders to a wider group of trading venues in a rebuff to the practice of “payment for order flow”. PFOF enables retail-focused brokers such as Robinhood to offer “free” trading to customers as market makers like Citadel Securities pay them to execute their orders.

The SEC’s ideas have stirred fierce debate among market participants over their potential impact. Comments on the proposals were due on Friday.

While retail brokers and market makers were expected to resist the proposals, which could threaten their current business models, several big fund managers are also sceptical that end users of the markets would benefit as the regulator intended.

Kenneth Bentsen, head of finance industry association Sifma, called on the SEC to study the extra data that would be collected under the most broadly supported proposal before deciding whether its more ambitious plans would benefit investors.

“We respect the SEC’s role as a policy and rulemaker, but it is acting very rapidly and largely on theory — and that could bring risk into the system,” he said. “Congress has looked at equity markets pretty closely in the last two years and its recommendations didn’t come close to what the SEC is proposing.” 

Sifma’s asset management arm has submitted a separate letter that also questions the value of the auction rule and of adding another best execution rule. Others to have raised issues include Fidelity, BlackRock. State Street Global Advisors, T Rowe Price and UBS Securities.

“We are concerned with the prescriptive nature of the proposal and believe that it does not clearly benefit retail investors and may disadvantage them,” said Fidelity. The fund manager is not involved in PFOF.


Retail trading reached record levels earlier this year, accounting for almost a quarter of all market activity on some days in late January according to JPMorgan analysts. The orders are considered particularly valuable.

The largest stock exchange groups have also raised concerns despite being the intended beneficiaries of some of the proposals. Exchanges have lost substantial market share to less heavily regulated groups such as Citadel Securities over the past decade, and Gensler has been vocal about his desire to reverse the trend.

Yet in its response to the SEC’s plans, the New York Stock Exchange teamed up with Citadel to voice its concerns. Although they are competitors, Citadel Securities is also a key client of the NYSE and its parent group Intercontinental Exchange.

In a letter that was also cosigned by Charles Schwab, the largest retail brokerage, the NYSE and Citadel Securities urged the regulator to withdraw the auction and best execution proposals, and to significantly water down the others.

They also requested the commission reconsider some previously agreed changes that were designed to increase transparency and would have been sped up under the most recent proposals.

NYSE rival Nasdaq was less critical, but also called for a more “incremental and pragmatic” approach. It said the regulator’s focus on auctions to improve competition for retail investors was risky, and warned there was “no silver bullet solution.” 

Its most vigorous criticism was targeted at the SEC’s plans to cut the fees that exchanges can charge for trading against their quotes. Nasdaq and NYSE use the fees to pay for rebates to other market makers and increase liquidity.

Nasdaq said “it would be arbitrary and capricious for the commission to proceed with the proposal in the absence of evidence that the current fee cap is actually harmful”.

However, not all exchanges were opposed. Brad Katsuyama, chief executive of IEX — which does not rely on rebates — said: “It has been nearly 20 years since the last major regulatory change in the stock market, making it hard to argue that modernising outdated rules will be bad for investors.” 

The SEC is expected to take time to review the comments before deciding what amendments, if any, to make.

FT : M&G to oppose private equity bid for UK exhibition group Hyve

M&G to oppose private equity bid for UK exhibition group Hyve
Big shareholders will vote against £481mn offer from US firm saying it undervalues company

M&G Investments will vote against a private equity takeover of UK-listed Hyve, along with at least two other large shareholders who warn the bid significantly undervalues the international exhibition company.

US firm Providence Equity Partners struck a deal last month to pay 108p per Hyve share, valuing the London-listed events business at £481mn. The board of Hyve said “the offer represents value for shareholders”. Its largest investor, Strategic Value Partners, has said it will vote in favour of the deal.

However, top shareholders including M&G, Redwheel, and Blackmoor Investment Partners are planning to vote against the offer in the coming weeks. For the deal to go ahead, Providence needs 75 per cent of shareholder capital voting in favour.

“The latest offer for Hyve materially undervalues the company and we plan to vote against the takeover,” Rupert Krefting, head of corporate finance and stewardship at M&G Investments, told the Financial Times.

“We remain supportive of the management team and their strategy to capitalise on the significant investments made in recent years.”

Shares in Hyve were trading above £6 before the pandemic, but investors argue earnings have yet to fully recover. Taking it off the market now would mean longstanding shareholders lose out on the opportunity to revert to pre-Covid levels, they argue.

Krefting said Hyve’s share price is also still recovering from the impact of divesting assets linked to Russia and its high cost of debt connected to acquisitions which have performed well for the company — a dynamic which will alter as debt is paid down.

Hyve was among a number of businesses that was hit hard by lockdown. The war against Ukraine also sped up its planned exit from Russia, which accounted for half its revenue in 2021.

“We think the company has a positive future under public ownership, to the benefit of our clients,” said Krefting.

Redwheel fund manager David Stewart, the second-largest shareholder in Hyve with more than 10 per cent, also plans to vote against the deal.

“If you’ve got a level of confidence in the ability of this company to deliver on its targets and strategies, you would not want to sell it at the minimum acceptable price at this point in time,” Stewart said. Hyve is targeting medium-term growth of at least £250mn in revenue and an operating margin of 30 per cent.

Although investors credit the management team for repositioning the company, its future growth prospects have yet to be reflected in the share price.

Douglas Smith, managing partner at top 20 shareholder Blackmoor Investment Partners, which will also vote against the deal, said: “The board suggests the offer gives a total entity value of £481mn, but our current analysis sees a lower net debt which suggests closer to £440mn.

“This is a high quality business that is just recovering: it has significant barriers to entry from the network effect at the individual conference level; has pricing power in these inflationary times; got rid of the unattractive Russia exposure; and, holds important positions in attractive conference segments that would slot neatly into a number of competitors portfolios.”

Providence and Hyve declined to comment.

Business Of Fashion : Fashion Can’t Count on Tourists to Come to the Rescue Agai

Fashion Can’t Count on Tourists to Come to the Rescue Again
Vacation destinations are gearing up for another huge year, including the return of Chinese travellers for the first time since the pandemic. But whether tourists will splurge on fashion like they did last year is less clear.

When writing about seasonal trends, I often find it’s helpful to look at what was written the last time around. What struck me about the start of the peak travel season in 2022 was how everyone — brands, analysts, journalists — was dead certain it was going to be a very, very good spring and summer. That’s more or less how it played out: tourism boomed (with the exception of China, still in zero-Covid lockdown). Travellers, particularly wealthy ones, splurged on new wardrobes.

Heading into the Easter holiday this coming weekend, after which it’s a short few weeks to Memorial Day in the US, and then summer vacations, the outlook is nowhere near as clear. For many brands, sales peaked soon after that magic summer, and giants like Levi’s, Gucci and Estée Lauder reported rare revenue declines in the fourth quarter. Rising interest rates and the Silicon Valley Bank crisis haven’t helped consumer sentiment since then. Forecasters are predicting Americans in particular will travel in even greater numbers this year, but inflation could take a toll: extra dollars spent on airfare and hotels leave less to spend on swimsuits and summer dresses.

Elsewhere, the picture is also hazy. Images from Paris of riots and trash piled up in the street may put a damper on travel to the city, where international tourists are a key market for many luxury brands. Perhaps not though; there are signs the protests and strikes are on the wane, and past bouts of unrest haven’t hurt Paris’ status as a top vacation destination.

Ironically, the exception to the gloomier consensus this time around is once again China, only in the opposite direction. Chinese citizens are free to travel the world for the first time since 2019. Forecasters are being cautious about how quickly international travel will bounce back: Oxford Economics predicts such traffic will hit 48 percent of 2019 levels this year, and many analysts expect Asian tourism hubs to see a rebound faster than Europe, the US and other far-flung destinations. There are already reports Chinese tourists are experiencing the skyrocketing airfares, shortages of planes and cabin crew and other inconveniences the rest of the world did after reopening. That didn’t stop Americans, Brits or Australians from spending last year, of course. And even a trickle of Chinese tourists will be welcome news for stores in Milan, Paris, New York and beyond that once relied on these visitors.

WWD : Dissecting the Billionaire Fashion in ‘Succession’

Dissecting the Billionaire Fashion in ‘Succession’
The hit HBO show has popularized the phenomenon of “stealth wealth” adopted by some real-life billionaires and admired by the general public.
For the last five years HBO’s “Succession” has resonated with fans for its witty dialogue, dysfunctional family relationships and finely curated wardrobe that has helped popularize a niche trend within minimalist fashion. And along the way it’s fueled demand for many of those understated products.

The hit TV show, which is airing new episodes of its final season on Sundays, has become one of the prime examples of the “stealth wealth” fashion phenomenon, one that Fashion Institute of Technology professor Cathleen Sheehan explained has been around long before “Succession” debuted.

“It’s things that are understated and polished,” Sheehan said. “They’re not saying, ‘look at me,’ but it’s more like, ‘look a little closer in order to really see what’s going on.’ You have to study it. It’s like when you’re sitting in a waiting room or on an airplane and you find yourself studying someone and looking closer at their sweater or shoes. It’s the care and the materials, and if you’re in the fashion business, you might recognize some of the pieces.”

Sheehan explained “stealth wealth” can be seen as an extension of previous minimalist fashion trends like ‘90s minimalism or the normcore of the 2010s. But “stealth wealth” is unique in its emphasis on quality and discretion.

This has been seen on many of the characters in “Succession,” which focuses on the dysfunctional relationships among patriarch Logan Roy (played by Brian Cox), who helms the international media conglomerate Waystar Royco, and his children, who are fighting for leadership of the company.

For the last three seasons, fans have come to expect the characters to be dressed in nondescript clothing, such as blank baseball caps, cashmere sweaters and neutral-colored suits that rarely jump off the screen. For superfans of the show, the logo-less clothing has become an Easter egg-style game of determining the brand behind the styles, which are typically luxury brands like Loro Piana, Brunello Cucinelli, Tom Ford, Paul Stuart, Ralph Lauren and others.
A still from “Succession” season four.
COURTESY OF HBO

“We did our research of the Rupert Murdochs, Sumner Redstones and Jeff Bezos of the world,” said Jonathan Schwartz, the assistant costume designer on “Succession.” “We don’t follow necessarily what they are wearing. We follow who the character is and where they would shop. Whereas Roman might be shopping more downtown, Tom would be shopping on Madison Avenue. It fits into this overall theme of billionaires because they’re definitely going to those high-priced stores, but it’s really the character that dictates the types of clothing they would wear.”

Or the items that wannabe billionaires want to buy. There have been numerous articles over the last five years of how “Succession” has helped fuel demand for certain luxury items — from Loro Piana’s baseball cap to its white-soled shoes. Both can cost in the hundreds of dollars but often have sold out at retail after a “Succession” character wears them.

Over the four seasons, Schwartz noted that Kendall Roy (played by Jeremy Strong) has had the biggest style evolution, which was meant to reflect the changes in his character. The character started off the show in corporate-style suits and has since evolved to more casual, yet pricey leather and suede jackets and streetwear sneakers. The character’s casual style still plays into “stealth wealth” as his clothing is typically from Loro Piana, Tom Ford or Gucci.

Schwartz stated that besides Kendall Roy, the show’s characters have had little evolution style-wise in the four seasons, which perhaps reflects a larger message.

“The funny thing about this show is even in the characters, nobody changes,” he said. “In writing, people are supposed to change and transform. That’s the funny thing about ‘Succession.’ They start off as bastards and they end up unchanged from that.”

Schwartz thinks the show’s costumes have worked because of their authenticity to the characters and how they don’t distract from the dialogue.

The show’s season four premiere episode seemingly addressed the characters’ inclination to “stealth wealth” when Nicholas Braun’s character (who is referred to as cousin Greg) brings a date to Logan Roy’s birthday party who accessorizes her look with what character Tom Wambsgans described as a “ludicrously capacious bag.” The bag in question was the Burberry Title Vintage Check Tote Bag, which despite a high price tag of $2,890, doesn’t fit in with the logo-free aesthetic prominent in “stealth wealth.”

It’s another example of viewers’ eagerness to “find the label.” After the episode aired, Google searches for the Burberry bag skyrocketed.

Both Schwartz and Sheehan believe the show’s costumes and “stealth wealth” have appealed to the masses for their aspirational quality. Sheehan also noted “stealth wealth” can be seen as an extension of the pandemic-influenced fashion trend of paring down wardrobes and investing in better quality pieces.

“It’s aspirational because they’re wearing Loro Piana sweaters that most of us might not be able to afford,” she said. “It’s a classic black turtleneck, but you have to study it and see why it looks good, what it is about it, so it’s aspirational. There’s something interesting about that that it feels like a shift from ‘look at me’ fashion to look a little closer.

WSJ : OPEC+ Members to Cut Production Through Year-End

OPEC+ Members to Cut Production Through Year-End
Curbs to total over 1 million barrels of oil a day, with much of the sum coming from Saudi Arabia

Some members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its Russia-led allies agreed to cut more than 1 million barrels a day until the end of the year tied to concerns over the stability of financial markets, said Saudi state media and OPEC delegates.

Much of the new reductions are coming from Saudi Arabia, state media said. The cut includes extending 500,000 barrels a day of voluntary reductions from Russia, OPEC’s biggest ally. The decision would add new curbs to a cut of 2 million barrels a day agreed to in October.

The cuts announced in October ratcheted up tensions with the Biden administration, which had hoped the group of petrostates would increase production and help tame rising inflation, driven in part by high energy prices. At the time, the White House accused the 23-member group collectively known as OPEC+ of actively supporting Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The move is likely to push up global energy prices and help oil-exporting Russia pay for its war in Ukraine. Moscow has been hit by bans on its oil exports to Europe and price caps after the invasion.

The latest cut comes as oil prices have tamed somewhat since highs of $100 a barrel last summer. Oil prices have risen close to $80 a barrel after a dispute over Iraqi Kurdish exports disrupted about 500,000 barrels a day of Iraqi exports.

The energy ministry of Saudi Arabia, which would cut 500,000 barrels a day, said in a written statement that its voluntary reduction was a precautionary measure aimed at boosting the stability of the oil markets.

Iraq, which is OPEC’s second-largest oil producer, would reduce its output by 211,000 barrels a day, its oil ministry said.

Saudi Arabia in particular is concerned about the vulnerability of the banking sector. A $1.5 billion Saudi investment in Credit Suisse Group AG was almost wiped out after Credit Suisse’s merger with UBS Group AG .

FT : Swiss prosecutor opens probe into Credit Suisse takeover

Swiss prosecutor opens probe into Credit Suisse takeover
Investigation will examine leaks and potential breaches of criminal law by officials, regulators and bank executives

Switzerland’s Federal Prosecutor has opened an investigation into the state-backed takeover of Credit Suisse by its larger rival UBS.

The Bern-based prosecutor is looking into potential breaches of Swiss criminal law by government officials, regulators and executives at the two banks, which agreed an emergency merger last month over the course of a frantic weekend in order to avert a potentially catastrophic financial crisis.

A focus of the probe concerns sensitive information from the negotiations that was leaked to the press, said a person familiar with the investigation, which could constitute a breach of state secrecy or industrial espionage laws. 

“The Federal Prosecutor’s office wants to proactively fulfil its mission and responsibility to contribute to a clean Swiss financial centre and has set up monitoring in order to take immediate action in any situation that falls within its field of activity,” the authority told the Financial Times.

There were “numerous aspects of events around Credit Suisse” that warranted investigation, it said, which needed to be analysed to “identify any crimes that could fall within the competence of the [prosecutor]”.

The prosecutor, Stefan Blättler, has issued a number of “investigatory orders” to government bodies. His office has also been in contact with the federal and cantonal governments and is likely to seek to interview key officials in relation to the takeover.

The forced marriage of the two banks has caused outcry in Switzerland: political parties have triggered a special sitting of parliament this month in which a formal commission of inquiry is likely to be voted into power.

Polling shows that more than three-quarters of Swiss citizens are opposed to the $3.25bn takeover, which will create a financial behemoth with more than SFr5tn ($5.5tn) of assets under management.

A majority support legislation to split up the bank or even measures to claw back bonuses from senior staff, who they say should be held responsible for their actions.

Parliamentarians from across the political spectrum have also questioned the use of emergency powers by the government — the seven-person Federal Council — to extend taxpayer-backed financial guarantees to UBS and to silence possible shareholder opposition.

The Federal Council issued an ordinance to wipe out more than SFr16bn of so-called AT1 subordinated hybrid debt instruments issued by Credit Suisse in order to smooth the takeover, while choosing to preserve some value for equity holders.

The measure angered some large international fixed-income investors, and caused concern among international regulators over its impact on other banks’ ongoing ability to raise capital.

Some of the investors affected have pledged to take the Swiss government and financial regulator to court over the decision.

Bern has insisted the urgency of the situation last month left it with few options. Credit Suisse experienced a dramatic deterioration in its ability to access liquidity in the days before the rescue was finalised, on March 19, the government has said.

According to finance minister Karin Keller-Sutter, a state takeover of Credit Suisse, or its orderly break-up in a process known as “resolution” were not viable alternatives to the takeover owing to the unacceptable financial risks to taxpayers they would have incurred.

Shareholders for both UBS and Credit Suisse — who were denied a say by the government fiat — will next week have an opportunity to air grievances at both banks’ annual meetings.

Credit Suisse and UBS declined to comment.

Miss Tweed : Watchmakers brace for a slowdown in 2023

Watchmakers brace for a slowdown in 2023

GENEVA - Demand for luxury watches is cooling down after the post-Covid boom of 2022, executives said at trade fairs in Geneva this week. Swiss watch exports may continue to rise but the reality is that distributors’ stock is growing and many retailers have become reticent to commit to major orders, they said.

The U.S. market, the biggest for many major watchmakers, is a top concern. Rising interest rates are holding back discretionary spending. U.S. consumers have a culture of revolving credit – they buy with their credit card and pay bills later. Rising interest rates mean that for upper and middle classes, luxury products such as watches, jewelry or handbags have become more expensive. On top of weakness in the U.S. market, demand in China is not recovering as fast as analysts expected and social unrest in France is likely to keep tourists away for the foreseeable future.

Hence, the global picture is far from rosy even though the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry said last month that watch exports had risen year-on-year by 12.2 percent in February, against 8.6 percent in January.

“Due to rising interest rates, after record growth in 2022, we are experiencing a temporary slowdown in discretionary spending in the United States,” Bulgari CEO Jean-Christophe Babin told Miss Tweed in an interview in Geneva, where the brand presented its latest watch collections. The U.S. is Bulgari’s third-biggest market after China and Japan. “The U.S. remain a territory of opportunity for luxury, but this market is now growing less than others.”

Babin, who just came back from China, said that market was recovering quickly but had not reached 2021 record levels in terms of traffic. With the recent reopening of Hong Kong and Macao, many shoppers have returned. However, traffic in malls and boutiques there and elsewhere in China is around 10 to 20 percent below what it was in 2021, said the executive, who has dual French and Italian nationality.” But if there are fewer visitors, those who come, spend more than two years ago.

“Those people who visit malls come more to spend money than to walk around,” Babin said. “As a result, we make more revenue in 2023 with fewer clients versus 2021.” He pointed to the fact that there were visa emission and flight capacity constraints that prevented Chinese tourists from leaving the country and shopping abroad. He expected them to start traveling overseas again in May or June.

Overall, after a record year in 2022, Babin said he expected Bulgari to enjoy solid growth this year, helped in part by local clients in Europe or Japan with which the brand has built strong relations in recent years. Another growth market is Saudi Arabia, which executives say is becoming the new Dubai of the Middle East in terms of the gravity center for luxury sales. Many luxury brands, including Bulgari, have created a subsidiary and are opening boutiques there.

Bertrand Savary, CEO of the Arnold & Son and Angelus watch brands, part of the Japanese group Citizen, said Saudi Arabia was one of his top priorities in terms of investment. “The population in Saudi Arabia is young and affluent,” Savary said on the fringes of the Watches & Wonders fair in Geneva. “The country is opening up and allowing joint ventures with foreign companies and offering attractive conditions for investors.”

Savary said he also planned to work on the European market and develop relationships with retailers and local customers. China is also on his top list of priorities in terms of market expansion. However, he said was concerned about the current social unrest in France. “When people see on television that Paris is burning, this frightens tourists,” he said. Savary also shared Babin’s worries about the U.S. market. “For me, there is a lot of concern about how the U.S. market is going to behave in the next few months,” he said. Like him, he predicted that China would not recover fully for a while. Taking all these factors into account, Savary said he planned to increase production this year by 20 percent against 45 percent last year. “We are going to be prudent this year in terms of production.”

Julien Tornare, CEO of Zenith which is part of LVMH like Bulgari, is one of many executives who say the post-Covid euphoria is fizzling out. “I think we are going to come back to a phase of normality after the post-Covid boom,” Tornare told Miss Tweed. But for Zenith, Tornare was quite optimistic about its growth prospects for 2023 after having enjoyed buoyant trading in the past three years. “We continue to enjoy strong growth. We don’t see any negative indicators at this time. Order books are full. Globally, we are not particularly exposed to any major turbulences.” Regarding the ongoing turmoil in France that could scare off tourists, he said: “In Europe, we have learned how to do business without tourists. So, even if there are fewer tourists this year, it’s not that bad.”

DIFFICULT YEAR AHEAD
Wholesalers are bracing themselves for a more difficult year. “There has been a paradigm change,” explained Maximilian Busser, CEO of MB&F, an independent watch brand that has won many prizes for its creativity and innovation. “Retailers are being much more cautious than last year. “Many big distributors told me that their total inventory had doubled since the beginning of the year. They are bracing themselves for a sharp slowdown,” Busser said.

However, there was some good news. If customers were frustrated when they couldn’t buy the watch they wantedlast year, replenished stocks this year mean they should now be able to buy the watch of their dreams. If last year, they bought whatever time pieces were available, this year they are likely to prefer to wait to get the model they want, he said. “On brands that have big volumes, customers are going to be able to leave the boutique with a watch,” Busser said. “But customers are no longer ready to buy whichever watch is available. They want the watch for which they came.”

Busser said MB&F was increasingly approached by distributors keen to sell the brand’s watches. However, since production is limited, he preferred to stick with those distributors that believed in MB&F from the beginning. This year, Busser said he expected to produce 420 watches against 345 in 2022. Demand for his brand is so strong that distributors have waiting lists of many years, he said.

SECOND HAND
The price of watches on the second-hand market dictates a brand’s desirability. One of the main worries for watch buyers is that the price of very popular models for hot brands such as Rolex, Patek Philippe and Audemars Piguet has been steadily falling since last year. The good news is that those who bought watches to speculate on their value in the second-hand market and were behind last year’s bubble are progressively disappearing from the market, industry players said.

Arjen Van De Vall, CEO of Richemont’s second-hand retailer Watchfinder, said it was difficult to predict what was going to happen in terms of price trends in second-hand time pieces. “If we talk purely about watches for which there was a lot of speculation, there is a risk that there could be a further decline in prices. But there could also be a further spike,” Van De Vall told Miss Tweed on the fringes of the Watches & Wonders trade fair.

“What we are seeing in the last few weeks is that collectors are getting back into the market,” he said. “Many people are still testing the waters. We see a lot more interest than six months ago for very high-end pieces, watches costing more than €30,000 on the second-hand market,” he noted. “What we see now is that there is more availability of pieces that were more difficult to secure six to nine months ago. Many flippers have left the market. Some of them made a lot of money but some of them also got burned,” he explained.

WHOLESALERS
In the past few years, many major watch groups and brands have cut down the number of wholesalers they work with. They prefer selling their products in their own boutiques. This allows them to control image, prices and stock. Also, they pocket the margin they were previously giving wholesalers.

Audemars Piguet, one of the market’s most popular brands, has been reducing its network of wholesalers for more than a decade and mainly relies on its own network of monobrand boutique. Same for Richard Mille. Patek Philippe, which for decades relied solely on third-party distributors, announced that it would cut the number of authorized dealers by 30 percent. This means that Patek Philippe is going to open boutiques. Rival Richemont, owner of Cartier, Van Cleef & Arpels and several watch brands, is also downsizing its network of wholesalers. In Paris, the Swiss group Bucherer, one the city’s most important watch retailers, closed down the accounts of several of its brands including Panerai, IWC and Jaeger-LeCoultre. Last year, Bucherer had already stopped selling Richemont’s Vacheron Constantin and Lange & Söhne.

One senior source close to Bucherer in Paris said the retailer told Richemont recently: “You cannot pick and choose like in a menu. Either Bucherer in Paris works with all of Richemont’s brands or Richemont takes all of its brands back.” The senior source added: “The idea was to send a warning to Richemont that they cannot behave like that. It is a matter of principle. You cannot say I am going to open boutiques for those brands that are doing well and I leave you those brands that are not doing particularly well.”

As wholesalers lose business with big brands, they are on the lookout for new names and concepts. Some independent brands that were struggling to find distributors one or two years ago say it has become much easier to find retail partners. “If three years ago, many watch dealers would tell us that they are not taking on any new brands, today they have become much more forthcoming,” Robert Punkenhofer, CEO of the minimalist Viennese watch brand Carl Suchy & Söhne founded in 2018. One of its investors is Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, the former chairman and CEO of Nestlé. Today, the brand works with 10 retailers including Chrono Passion in Paris.

Former banker François Moreau is the founder of Reservoir, a watch brand launched in 2017 that features both a retrograde minute hand and jumping hour indicator. It looks like an RPM gauge or speedometer, and is coupled with a power reserve function that indicates how much autonomy the automatic time pieces have. Many Reservoir watches are inspired by vintage cars’ dashboards like that ofPorsche 356 Speedster from the 1950s. Some also feature cartoons like Popeye. “Yes, it’s true that it has become easier to find distributors but they are mainly interested in brands that stand out from others,” Moreau told Miss Tweed.

Reservoir, alongside 50 other brands, took part in the Time to Watches fair at Geneva’s HEAD fashion and design school. It ran in parallel to the Watches & Wonders fair at Palexpo out near the city’s airport. Miss Tweed was not given access to the Watches & Wonders fair, even though it had received an email that confirmed it was registered. The organizers of the fair did not give any warning about the fact that the media was no longer accredited. The explanation, provided by the brands that had invited Miss Tweed to the fair, was that Richemont had blacklisted the Paris-based media. The same thing happened in 2022. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.