>>> Barron’s weekend Summary

Cover:
-OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is engaged in various ventures, including verifying humans on the blockchain, advising a public company competing with Salesforce for marketing tech tools, promoting a Dan Ives-branded AI-focused ETF, and supporting a clothing line. Meanwhile, Dan Ives, global head of tech research at Wedbush Securities, has become a prominent Wall Street analyst due to his optimistic views and media presence, but his extracurricular roles at Eightco Holdings and Zeta Global, along with his involvement in Wedbush's AI fund, raise concerns about potential conflicts of interest. Ives' s support for AI and crypto on Capitol Hill, while also covering these sectors for Wedbush, may compromise his objectivity, highlighting the importance of transparency in analyst disclosures as required by Finra regulations.

Interview:
-CoreWeave, led by CEO Michael Intrator, distinguishes itself as a non-traditional tech firm focused on providing cloud-computing resources for AI giants like OpenAI and Meta. Intrator, who comes from a commodities and finance background, emphasizes the technical expertise within CoreWeave, which operates large data centers, including a significant 450,000-square-foot site in Plano, Texas, primarily utilizing Nvidia's GPUs. In financing these capital-intensive operations, CoreWeave employs innovative debt market strategies, a departure from the typical Silicon Valley reliance on equity financing. Intrator critiques this conventional approach as inefficient, arguing that debt is crucial for the sustainable development of infrastructure and that the debt markets demand accountability—highlighted by CoreWeave's substantial financial obligations, with $10.3B in long-term debt and $310M in interest expenses reported in their recent quarter. This perspective reflects a broader understanding of balancing financial strategy with technological advancement.

Tech Trader:
-Microsoft unveiled its earnings report, focusing investor attention on its artificial intelligence (AI) initiatives. The company is promoting an AI assistant, Copilot, available as a $30 upgrade for its Microsoft 365 productivity suite, which has about 450 million users. According to CFO Amy Hood, only 15 million users (3%) have subscribed to Copilot thus far, and its sales have not significantly impacted the top line revenue growth of the Microsoft 365 commercial cloud unit, which was up 14%—consistent with previous growth rates. This raises concerns as the AI monetization strategy does not appear to be thriving, and the use of Microsoft's Azure cloud resources for Copilot may be detracting from more profitable services. Consequently, investors reacted negatively, leading to a 10% drop in Microsoft's stock on Thursday, the largest single-day decline since March 2020, despite the company's earnings and revenue surpassing Wall Street expectations.

The Trader:
-The health insurance sector, particularly UnitedHealth Group (UNH), is facing significant challenges, evidenced by a 17% drop in share prices. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed a 0.09% increase in Medical Advantage insurance premiums for 2027, substantially lower than the expected 5%, which could severely impact future earnings. UnitedHealth's recent fourth-quarter results showed revenue of $113.2 billion, falling short of the $113.8 billion forecast, alongside a disappointing guidance for 2026 sales at $439 billion compared to Wall Street's $453 billion. Revenue projections from its Optum unit are also down, expected at $257.5 billion, $18.5 billion below expectations, as the company emphasizes Optum Insight. Additionally, UnitedHealth anticipates a drop of over 1 million Medicare Advantage members due to a strategic right-sizing aimed at cost reduction. Its medical cost ratio has risen for three consecutive years, squeezing profit margins, and the Department of Justice is investigating its government funding requests, complicating the situation further.
-Pharmaceutical stocks have surged, with the State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF rising 32% in six months and nearing its 2015 high. The sector's growth is attributed to a renewed interest in healthcare, with the State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF increasing 15%. Investment in artificial intelligence by healthcare companies is expected to enhance profit margins. Positive sentiment from the J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference regarding FDA approvals for new drug candidates has further boosted market confidence, with notable gains among companies like Merck (27%), Gilead Sciences (24%), and Regeneron (38%). However, the rising valuations may pose risks; any earnings shortfalls or drug pipeline setbacks could lead to stock declines, despite the potential for sustained earnings growth as forecasted by analysts.

Features:
-Credit card issuers, including Visa and American Express, reported strong consumer spending in the last quarter of 2025, with Visa's U.S. payments volume up 7% and American Express noting a 10% increase in retail spending. Visa's CFO highlighted robust holiday spending consistent across income levels, while American Express indicated a 15% rise in luxury retail due to its wealthier clientele. Despite concerns about consumer affordability, these trends suggest that Americans participated actively in holiday shopping. Analysts anticipate further spending growth in the new year, bolstered by potential tax cuts and projected increases in refunds, which could add around $100B in consumer spending this year.
-Kevin Warsh has been selected by President Donald Trump to lead the Federal Reserve, a choice influenced by Warsh’s extensive background, including his previous role as a Fed governor. At 55, Warsh advocates for a "regime change" at the Fed, proposing a shift from the current Chair Jerome Powell’s “data-driven” approach to one that prioritizes government spending and money circulation as key determinants of inflation. Warsh criticizes the Powell Fed for being overly focused on outdated economic data, claiming it has failed and lost market confidence. Following his nomination, the initial response from financial markets was mild, indicating a general expectation for a short-term easing of interest rates. Warsh's potential nomination is seen by some investors as a stabilizing factor amidst Trump’s unpredictable policies, as evidenced by gold prices dropping and the dollar strengthening, implying a market belief in future interest rate hikes. This nomination may reassure skeptics of Trump's influence over the Fed while remaining attentive to inflation concerns.

Europe:
-President Trump’s comments regarding Greenland have intensified discussions in Europe about digital sovereignty, prompting European allies to consider reducing their reliance on American technology companies. This shift in focus has expanded from being primarily a concern of civil society and tech regulators to involving national security agencies, highlighting heightened fears of potential exploitation by the US government. France has announced plans to replace American videoconferencing tools with domestic alternatives as a precaution. Europe's path toward digital sovereignty will depend on distinguishing between areas of achievable independence and those that remain unrealistic, while also being motivated by national and economic security concerns in light of the broader implications of US technology dependence.

Emerging Markets:
-Wall Street strategists predict that emerging markets will continue to outperform in 2023, following a strong performance last year. The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF has risen by 7.2% this year, compared to a 1% increase in the S&P 500. JP Morgan's Mislav Matejka highlighted several factors sustaining this optimism, such as expected interest rate cuts by many emerging market central banks, a weakening dollar, potential economic improvement in China, and favorable investments in artificial intelligence within emerging markets. Additionally, Goldman Sachs anticipates a 17% total return for MSCI Emerging Markets, supported by 19% earnings growth. Although valuations have increased, they remain lower than those in developed markets, creating favorable conditions for investors. Most investors are still underexposed to these markets.

Commodities:
-Gold and copper reached record highs, up 23% and 10% respectively in January 2026, with gold achieving its longest winning streak since March 2025. Silver also saw a significant increase, closing well above $100 after a 60% rise year to date. Julian Emanuel from Evercore ISI believes that the 2020 commodity supercycle is reinforced by chronic supply underinvestment and increasing policy-driven demand. Discussions with Jeff Currie highlight a positive outlook for commodities, especially metals, despite a temporary dip from 2023 to 2024. Supply challenges stem from investments diverted to tech and AI, alongside historical low returns and environmental constraints. Conversely, global demand drivers extend beyond AI, as countries prioritize energy security and self-sufficient supply chains amid deglobalization trends.

Streetwise:
-Wall Street refers to the term "debasement trade" in relation to the sharp increase in gold prices, which have surged from $3,400 to over $5,600 per troy ounce within months. Jack Hough suggests that despite this rise, we have not yet experienced monetary debasement, which is distinct from inflation. While inflation denotes a gradual price increase, debasement signifies a loss of credibility in a monetary system—illustrated by historical instances like Zimbabwe and Argentina. Hough emphasizes that debasement can begin with excessive government spending leading to chronic deficits and high inflation relative to interest rates, resulting in decreased investor confidence in government bonds and a preference for alternative currencies. This clear differentiation highlights the importance of understanding economic terms and their implications for monetary value stability.

>>> AI INFRASTRUCTURE: WHERE THE MONEY MOVES IN 2026

AI INFRASTRUCTURE: WHERE THE MONEY MOVES IN 2026
WHAT'S HAPPENING
Nvidia-OpenAI deal collapsed. This signals the end of "vendor lock-in" as the dominant narrative. When OpenAI diversifies compute (AMD, Cerebras, Broadcom), the monopoly story dies. But the AI capex cycle continues—the margin just shifts.

THE CORE DYNAMICS
1. Nvidia's Margin Compression Is Structural
Custom silicon (Google TPU, Amazon Trainium) is now operational. When hyperscalers have optionality, they use it. Nvidia pricing power erodes from $35k to $20-25k per GPU within 12-18 months. Consensus doesn't price this because they assume monopoly forever. Wrong.
Signal to watch: Feb 25 earnings. If Huang guides gross margin below 74% for Q1 FY2027, margin compression has started.
2. Microsoft's OpenAI Play Is Binary on Ads
Microsoft owns 27% of OpenAI. Series C will dilute to ~18-20%. Unless OpenAI ads partnership happens (needs Microsoft OR Amazon as partner), equity stake value gets hammered on down-round.
The real play: If OpenAI announces ads partnership with Microsoft by Q2 2026, MSFT at $395 is a buy. If no announcement by Q3 2026, exit.
3. Amazon Is Positioned to Win on Multiple Vectors
  • Trainium/Inferentia: Production ready, cost advantage real
  • Anthropic lock-in: Exclusive AWS partnership, can't defect
  • Margin capture: Training + inference + cloud hosting
  • Equity upside: Anthropic Series C at $200-250B realistic (not 350B hype)
Amazon outperforms not because it beats Nvidia in chips, but because it captures margin from multiple layers (infrastructure + software + equity).

YOUR POSITIONS
LONG: Amazon (AMZN)
  • Trainium traction validates in Q2-Q3 2026
  • Anthropic Series C becomes real (watch for $200-250B close, not 350B)
  • AWS capex guidance (Q1 2026) signals confidence
  • Upside: 15-20% through 2026
HOLD: Google (GOOGL)
  • AI infrastructure value already priced in
  • Keep position for DeepMind/Waymo upside (separate from AI infra)
  • Monitor: If TPU third-party access announced, GCP becomes "just another cloud"
CONDITIONAL: Microsoft (MSFT) at $395
  • BUY IF: OpenAI ads partnership announced (Microsoft or Amazon as partner) by Q2 2026
  • AVOID IF: No ads announcement by Q3 2026 (equity dilution risk outweighs upside)
  • The signal: Any OpenAI ad pilot = entry justified
SHORT: Nvidia (NVDA)
  • Not via outright short (Vera Rubin surprise risk)
  • Via options: Short call spreads ($250-280 Feb 2027)
  • Profit from consolidation, cap your downside
WATCH: Infra Names + PE Vultures
  • Data center REITs (EQIX, DLR): Upside real but wait for Q1 2026 utilization data
  • PE plays: Watch for OpenAI cash pressure or hyperscaler capex slowdown (Q2-Q3 2026)

THE OPTIONS STRATEGIES (February 2026 Earnings Volatility)
Strategy 1: Long AMD Call Spreads
Trade: Buy $120 calls / Sell $135 calls (Feb 2027)
  • Cost: $3.50 per spread
  • Max profit: $11.50 (if AMD > $135)
  • Max loss: $3.50 (if AMD < $120)
Why: AMD Q4 earnings (early Feb) is binary on MI450 credibility. Spread lets you play upside with defined downside.
Listen for red flags:
  • "ROCm ecosystem maturing" (still not ready)
  • MI355 deployment units slowing (customers losing confidence)
  • No MI450 sampling timeline disclosed (too risky)
Green flags:
  • "MI450 customer sampling underway Q1 2026"
  • Gross margin stable or improving
Sizing: 5-10 spreads ($1,750-3,500 capital at risk)

Strategy 2: Short Nvidia Call Spreads
Trade: Sell $280 calls / Buy $250 calls (Feb 2027)
  • Credit: $3-4 per spread
  • Max profit: $3-4 (if NVDA < $250)
  • Max loss: $27-30 (if NVDA > $280)
Why: Nvidia Q4 earnings (Feb 25) signals margin pressure. Spread collects premium while protecting against Vera Rubin surprise. You profit from consolidation.
Listen for red flags:
  • "Customers pre-committing for future quarters" (soft orders)
  • "Demand exceeds supply" with no capacity metrics (backlog uncertainty)
  • Any mention of pricing pressure
Green flags:
  • Gross margin holds 75%+
  • Specific pricing examples (confidence in pricing power)
Sizing: 5-10 spreads ($1,500-3,000 max loss)

Strategy 3: Pair Trade (Self-Financing)
Structure:
  • Long AMD spreads ($120-135) → costs $3.50
  • Short Nvidia spreads ($250-280) → generates $3-4
  • Net cost: ~$0 (nearly self-financing)
What you're betting: AMD gains share from Nvidia over next 12 months. If MI450 validates + Nvidia margins compress, both spreads work. If both disappoint, both lose (limited to spread width).
Capital at risk: ~$5,000-10,000 for 5-10 pair trades
Exit: By Aug 2026, if one spread is clearly winning, close the loser and let winner run. By Sep 2026, close both.

THE TIMELINE
Date Event What To Watch
Feb 25 Nvidia Q4 earnings Gross margin guidance for Q1 FY2027 (74% = compression signal)
Early Feb AMD Q4 earnings MI450 sampling timeline + ROCm maturity claims
Q1 2026 Hyperscaler earnings AI capex %, custom silicon mentions, power constraints
Q2 2026 OpenAI Series C close Valuation (200-250B realistic, 350B is hype) + Microsoft ads announcement
Q2-Q3 2026 Oracle MI450 deployment Real validation if customers actually deploy (not just orders)
Aug 2026 Review options Close winners, exit spreads that are clearly dead
THE BOTTOM LINE
Don't chase consensus. Nvidia's monopoly narrative is breaking. The margin moves to:
  1. Companies with custom silicon optionality (Amazon via Trainium)
  2. Companies with exclusive workload lock-in (Amazon via Anthropic)
  3. Companies with strategic partnerships (Microsoft IF ads work)
The options strategies let you play Feb earnings volatility with defined risk. AMD/Nvidia pair trade is self-financing and captures relative performance (the real thesis).
The key question: When does OpenAI hit a cash wall? If burn rate exceeds $2B/month by Q2 2026, PE vultures enter. If muddles through, Amazon/Microsoft benefit from continued capex.
Position accordingly.

Graham Advisors | January 31, 2026

Barron's : S&P Global Stock: More Than the Sum of Its Parts

S&P Global Stock: More Than the Sum of Its Parts
The stock has moved little despite impressive financial results. Its expansion into private credit is one avenue to growth.

  • S&P Global’s earnings per share have grown 17% annually since 2022 and are projected to increase by 44% for fiscal 2025.
  • The company’s Ratings division, generating 34% of 2025 revenue, is set to benefit from lower interest rates and more than $8 trillion in debt maturing by 2028.
  • S&P Global acquired With Intelligence for $1.8 billion, adding over 3,000 customers and $130 million in revenue to its private-market data offerings.

You’d be hard-pressed to find an investor who hasn’t heard of the S&P 500. Yet how many of them know that the equity benchmark’s parent, S&P Global, could serve as a way to add growth and value to their portfolios?

Despite the company’s impressive results last year, its stock gained just 5% as investors shunned companies deemed insufficiently aligned with artificial intelligence. They may want to recheck their prompts. Several tailwinds—among them, ironically, AI—are poised to catapult S&P Global past its rough patch.

“Over 95% of our revenue comes from proprietary benchmarks, data, and tools,” CEO Martina Cheung said at the company’s investor day in November. The company’s ownership of these data sets provides AI data-licensing opportunities through third parties. S&P Global sees “AI players as an additional distribution channel” that can only “improve economics with our customers,” she says.

It has also been developing its own generative-AI and agentic capabilities in response to customer demand, and it has offered machine-readable data feeds since 2020. In November 2024, it launched ChatIQ, “a GenAI-powered assistant,” on its Capital IQ Pro platform.

The company’s ratings division—which is expected to generate about 34% of its $15.3 billion in revenue in 2025 and contributed 41% of third-quarter earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or Ebitda—stands to profit from a confluence of macro factors on the horizon.

Should interest rates continue their descent, companies will likely issue more debt, which will require credit ratings. The so-called maturity wall would also help business: “We see over $8 trillion coming due through 2028, all of which needs to be refinanced,” said Cheung. “That is significantly higher than the 10-year historical average and about 9% higher over 2024.” An increase in global mergers-and-acquisitions activity —forecast by analysts at Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and others—would also trigger an increase in debt issuance and additional opportunities for S&P Global.

Its expansion into private-market data and services—most recently with the $1.8 billion acquisition of With Intelligence, which provides data for private-credit funds and other alternative investments—is another growth driver.


“Private-market data, which tends to be much more fragmented, is all highly proprietary information you can’t necessarily scrape from the internet,” Brian McKnight, an analyst at Tocqueville Asset Management, tells Barron’s. “There are certainly synergies that can be unlocked with S&P Global’s existing private-markets data sets.”

With the acquisition comes over 3,000 customers and an incremental $130 million in revenue, expanding S&P Global’s existing private-market data set to 60 million companies.

The New York–based company, founded in 1917 by James McGraw and John Hill, has expanded margins on Ebitda by 1.8 percentage points a year since 2022. Diluted earnings per share, which have grown at a 17% compounded annual growth rate since 2022, are expected to jump 14% in 2025, according to consensus estimates. S&P Global’s free cash flow has expanded at a compounded rate of 30% since 2022.

A reliable generator of free cash flow, dividends, and earnings for the past 10 years, the company has an established framework for returning 85% of free cash flow through dividends and share repurchases. A discounted cash-flow valuation—using the company’s weighted average cost of capital of 8.1% and a modest 1.5% perpetual growth on a terminal value of $181.5 billion—produces a target share price of $722, about 35% above Wednesday’s close of $528.12.

If S&P Global continues its current trajectory, the market could reward it with a 12-month forward price/earnings multiple of 39 times, up from its current 26 times. Layering that multiple across a 2026 earnings estimate of $20 a share would result in a stock price of $760. Averaging the two valuation methods yields $741—49% higher than current levels.

S&P Global trades at 26.5 times forward earnings, compared with its five-year average of 39.7—a 16% discount to Moody’s, the other major public credit-rating firm. As recently as last July, the discount was 20%.


The company generates a 3.6% free-cash-flow yield and is expected to have repurchased about $5 billion of its shares for 2025 when it reports its fourth-quarter results on Feb. 10—about a 3.1% return.

Risks to the investment thesis include geopolitical volatility, which can reduce debt issuance. This would have a negative impact on S&P Global’s ratings business. Such volatility can depress equity prices, as well, potentially harming the company’s S&P Dow Jones Indices unit’s revenue. (The unit has no relationship with Barron’s publisher, Dow Jones.) Tariffs also pose a risk, albeit indirectly: The company reported in its third-quarter 10-Q that manufacturers have reduced their discretionary budgets in response to tariff uncertainty.

Even with these risks, the stock’s current valuation makes for a rich opportunity, especially with the private-credit growth driver. S&P Global could help your portfolio beat the benchmark.

THE TECHNICAL VIEW
The financial-data play is trading 8% below its most recent 52-week high and is now forming the handle of a weekly cup base, a pattern that began with a bearish shooting star in August. Positive technical signals include a bullish golden cross last week, as the 50-day simple moving average crossed above the 200-day. A move toward $652 in the second half of the year would represent roughly 23% upside from current levels. Remain bullish above $510.—Doug Busch

THE QUANTITATIVE VIEW
Bottom Line: SPGI reads as a high-quality financial-data and ratings franchise with standout profitability and durable quality metrics, supported by strong growth and technical strength. The trade-off is a weaker valuation/setup on traditional factors (low valuation and investment ranks) and a softer balance-sheet score, which can leave the stock more sensitive to multiple compression. Barron’s relative ranking has improved meaningfully over the past three months, reinforcing a constructive near-term tape.
Bias: Hold/accumulate on pullbacks; best suited for quality-oriented investors who can tolerate valuation risk and want exposure to financial infrastructure and data/analytics tailwinds

Barron's : Abbott Stock Fell the Most in 23 Years After Earnings. The CEO Bought

Abbott Stock Fell the Most in 23 Years After Earnings. The CEO Bought $2 Million of Shares.

  • Abbott Laboratories’ shares experienced their largest decline in over two decades, dropping 10% following its fourth-quarter earnings report.
  • CEO Robert Ford purchased 18,800 shares for approximately $2 million.
  • Abbott’s nutrition unit, including Similac and Ensure, significantly affected results, as price increases constrained sales volume growth.

Shares of Abbott Laboratories suffered their worst drop in more than 20 years following Abbott’s fourth-quarter earnings report. The company’s chief executive remains a believer in the stock.

A Form 4 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this week shows CEO Robert Ford bought 18,800 shares for roughly $107.13 each, or $2 million in total, on Friday.

The shares are held in a family trust, of which Ford is a co-trustee, meaning he counts them among 216,203 shares he owns indirectly. Ford owns an additional 253,305 shares directly.

“Mr. Ford’s purchase reflects his confidence in the company’s long‑term strategy and growth trajectory,” Abbott spokesperson Scott Stoffel told Barron’s.

The purchase was Ford’s first in nearly a year. The last time the CEO bought Abbott stock was in March, when he snapped up 31,651 shares for around $4.3 million. A separate securities filing shows he held those shares directly.

Ford’s latest transaction comes on the heels of Abbott’s fourth-quarter earnings report, which triggered a double-digit percentage decline in the stock. Shares fell 10% on Thursday, marking their worst drop since June 11, 2002, when they plunged 16%.

Adjusted earnings beat analysts’ forecasts by a penny, while sales came to $11.5 billion, missing the $11.8 billion consensus estimate. Quarterly performance was mixed across business lines.

The biggest drag on results was Abbott’s nutrition unit, which includes Similac baby formula and Ensure-branded meal supplements. For the past several quarters, the business has struggled despite Abbott’s efforts to offset higher manufacturing costs by raising prices.

In the current environment for consumer spending, the price hikes appear to have constrained sales volume growth, Ford said. Many consumer-goods businesses are facing the same problem, he said.

He struck an upbeat tone on the earnings call, saying Abbott was well-positioned for accelerating growth in 2026. “While we know we’ve got some work to do in nutrition, I can guarantee you that we’re not distracted by that,” Ford said.

Barron's : S&P Global Stock: More Than the Sum of Its Parts

S&P Global Stock: More Than the Sum of Its Parts
The stock has moved little despite impressive financial results. Its expansion into private credit is one avenue to growth.

S&P Global’s earnings per share have grown 17% annually since 2022 and are projected to increase by 44% for fiscal 2025.
The company’s Ratings division, generating 34% of 2025 revenue, is set to benefit from lower interest rates and more than $8 trillion in debt maturing by 2028.
S&P Global acquired With Intelligence for $1.8 billion, adding over 3,000 customers and $130 million in revenue to its private-market data offerings.

You’d be hard-pressed to find an investor who hasn’t heard of the S&P 500. Yet how many of them know that the equity benchmark’s parent, S&P Global, could serve as a way to add growth and value to their portfolios?

Despite the company’s impressive results last year, its stock gained just 5% as investors shunned companies deemed insufficiently aligned with artificial intelligence. They may want to recheck their prompts. Several tailwinds—among them, ironically, AI—are poised to catapult S&P Global past its rough patch.

“Over 95% of our revenue comes from proprietary benchmarks, data, and tools,” CEO Martina Cheung said at the company’s investor day in November. The company’s ownership of these data sets provides AI data-licensing opportunities through third parties. S&P Global sees “AI players as an additional distribution channel” that can only “improve economics with our customers,” she says.

It has also been developing its own generative-AI and agentic capabilities in response to customer demand, and it has offered machine-readable data feeds since 2020. In November 2024, it launched ChatIQ, “a GenAI-powered assistant,” on its Capital IQ Pro platform.

The company’s ratings division—which is expected to generate about 34% of its $15.3 billion in revenue in 2025 and contributed 41% of third-quarter earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or Ebitda—stands to profit from a confluence of macro factors on the horizon.

Should interest rates continue their descent, companies will likely issue more debt, which will require credit ratings. The so-called maturity wall would also help business: “We see over $8 trillion coming due through 2028, all of which needs to be refinanced,” said Cheung. “That is significantly higher than the 10-year historical average and about 9% higher over 2024.” An increase in global mergers-and-acquisitions activity —forecast by analysts at Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, and others—would also trigger an increase in debt issuance and additional opportunities for S&P Global.

Its expansion into private-market data and services—most recently with the $1.8 billion acquisition of With Intelligence, which provides data for private-credit funds and other alternative investments—is another growth driver.


“Private-market data, which tends to be much more fragmented, is all highly proprietary information you can’t necessarily scrape from the internet,” Brian McKnight, an analyst at Tocqueville Asset Management, tells Barron’s. “There are certainly synergies that can be unlocked with S&P Global’s existing private-markets data sets.”

With the acquisition comes over 3,000 customers and an incremental $130 million in revenue, expanding S&P Global’s existing private-market data set to 60 million companies.

The New York–based company, founded in 1917 by James McGraw and John Hill, has expanded margins on Ebitda by 1.8 percentage points a year since 2022. Diluted earnings per share, which have grown at a 17% compounded annual growth rate since 2022, are expected to jump 14% in 2025, according to consensus estimates. S&P Global’s free cash flow has expanded at a compounded rate of 30% since 2022.

A reliable generator of free cash flow, dividends, and earnings for the past 10 years, the company has an established framework for returning 85% of free cash flow through dividends and share repurchases. A discounted cash-flow valuation—using the company’s weighted average cost of capital of 8.1% and a modest 1.5% perpetual growth on a terminal value of $181.5 billion—produces a target share price of $722, about 35% above Wednesday’s close of $528.12.

If S&P Global continues its current trajectory, the market could reward it with a 12-month forward price/earnings multiple of 39 times, up from its current 26 times. Layering that multiple across a 2026 earnings estimate of $20 a share would result in a stock price of $760. Averaging the two valuation methods yields $741—49% higher than current levels.

S&P Global trades at 26.5 times forward earnings, compared with its five-year average of 39.7—a 16% discount to Moody’s, the other major public credit-rating firm. As recently as last July, the discount was 20%.


The company generates a 3.6% free-cash-flow yield and is expected to have repurchased about $5 billion of its shares for 2025 when it reports its fourth-quarter results on Feb. 10—about a 3.1% return.

Risks to the investment thesis include geopolitical volatility, which can reduce debt issuance. This would have a negative impact on S&P Global’s ratings business. Such volatility can depress equity prices, as well, potentially harming the company’s S&P Dow Jones Indices unit’s revenue. (The unit has no relationship with Barron’s publisher, Dow Jones.) Tariffs also pose a risk, albeit indirectly: The company reported in its third-quarter 10-Q that manufacturers have reduced their discretionary budgets in response to tariff uncertainty.

Even with these risks, the stock’s current valuation makes for a rich opportunity, especially with the private-credit growth driver. S&P Global could help your portfolio beat the benchmark.

THE TECHNICAL VIEW
The financial-data play is trading 8% below its most recent 52-week high and is now forming the handle of a weekly cup base, a pattern that began with a bearish shooting star in August. Positive technical signals include a bullish golden cross last week, as the 50-day simple moving average crossed above the 200-day. A move toward $652 in the second half of the year would represent roughly 23% upside from current levels. Remain bullish above $510.—Doug Busch

THE QUANTITATIVE VIEW
Bottom Line: SPGI reads as a high-quality financial-data and ratings franchise with standout profitability and durable quality metrics, supported by strong growth and technical strength. The trade-off is a weaker valuation/setup on traditional factors (low valuation and investment ranks) and a softer balance-sheet score, which can leave the stock more sensitive to multiple compression. Barron’s relative ranking has improved meaningfully over the past three months, reinforcing a constructive near-term tape.
Bias: Hold/accumulate on pullbacks; best suited for quality-oriented investors who can tolerate valuation risk and want exposure to financial infrastructure and data/analytics tailwinds

WSJ : The $100 Billion Megadeal Between OpenAI and Nvidia Is on Ice

The $100 Billion Megadeal Between OpenAI and Nvidia Is on Ice
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has privately played down likelihood original deal will be finalized, although the two companies will continue to have a close collaboration

Nvidia’s NVDA -0.72%decrease; red down pointing triangle plan to invest up to $100 billion in OpenAI to help it train and run its latest artificial-intelligence models has stalled after some inside the chip giant expressed doubts about the deal, people familiar with the matter said.

The companies unveiled the giant agreement last September at Nvidia’s Santa Clara, Calif., headquarters. They announced a memorandum of understanding for Nvidia to build at least 10 gigawatts of computing power for OpenAI, and the chip maker also agreed to invest up to $100 billion to help OpenAI pay for it. As part of the deal, OpenAI agreed to lease the chips from Nvidia.

At the time, the ChatGPT-maker expected the deal negotiations to be completed in the coming weeks, people familiar with the plans said. But the talks haven’t progressed beyond the early stages, some of the people said.

Now, the two sides are rethinking the future of their partnership, some of the people said. The latest discussions, they said, include an equity investment of tens of billions of dollars as part of OpenAI’s current funding round.

Nvidia Chief Executive Jensen Huang has privately emphasized to industry associates in recent months that the original $100 billion agreement was nonbinding and not finalized, people familiar with the matter said. He has also privately criticized what he has described as a lack of discipline in OpenAI’s business approach and expressed concern about the competition it faces from the likes of Google and Anthropic, some of the people said.

“Our teams are actively working through details of our partnership. NVIDIA technology has underpinned our breakthroughs from the start, powers our systems today, and will remain central as we scale what comes next,” an OpenAI spokesman said.

An Nvidia spokeswoman said that Nvidia has been OpenAI’s preferred partner for the past 10 years and it looked forward to continuing working with the company.

OpenAI is laying the foundation to go public by the end of 2026, and has spent much of the past year racing to secure large amounts of computing capacity to help power OpenAI’s future products and growth. The stalled Nvidia pact is a blow to this effort and shows how CEO Sam Altman’s penchant for announcing flashy big-ticket deals carries the potential to backfire if the terms have yet to be finalized.

In a joint announcement unveiling the September deal with Altman and OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Huang called the deal “the largest computing project in history.” Nvidia’s stock rose by nearly 4% on the news, pushing its market value to almost $4.5 trillion. As part of the deal, Nvidia discussed guaranteeing some of the loans OpenAI planned to take out to build its own data centers, The Wall Street Journal previously reported.

OpenAI went on to sign a string of other agreements with chip and cloud companies that helped fuel a global stock-market rally. But investors have since grown jittery about the startup’s ability to pay for these deals, leading to a selloff in some tech stocks tied to OpenAI. Altman has said that the deals put the startup on the hook for $1.4 trillion in computing commitments—more than 100 times the revenue it was on pace to generate last year.

OpenAI executives say the total commitments are lower after accounting for overlap in some of the deals, and that the agreements will take place over a long period.

Much of the recent concern about OpenAI has come from the success of Google’s Gemini app, which slowed ChatGPT’s growth and led OpenAI to declare a code red. Anthropic is also putting pressure on OpenAI thanks to its popular AI coding agent, called Claude Code. Nvidia said in November that it was committing to invest up to $10 billion into Anthropic.

In a November filing, Nvidia said there was no assurance that it would “enter into definitive agreements with respect to the OpenAI opportunity or other potential investments, or that any investment will be completed on expected terms, if at all.”

At a UBS conference in Scottsdale, Ariz., the following month, Nvidia CFO Colette Kress said that the company hadn’t completed a definitive agreement with OpenAI.

Huang has indicated to associates that he still believes it is crucially important to provide OpenAI with financial support in one form or another, in part because OpenAI is one of the chip designer’s largest customers, people familiar with the matter said. If OpenAI were to fall behind other AI developers, it could dent Nvidia’s sales.

Anthropic relies heavily on a combination of chips designed by Amazon Web Services known as Trainium, as well as Google’s in-house designed TPU processors, to train its AI models. Google largely uses its TPUs to train Gemini. Both chips represent major competitive threats to Nvidia’s bestselling products, known as graphics processing units, or GPUs.

News Corp, owner of The Wall Street Journal, has a content-licensing partnership with OpenAI.

>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
  • Gapping up:
    • GCL +65.4%, SNDK +20.3%, DECK +14%, RHI +10.7%, TBN +6%, RMD +4.8%, USAR +3.9%, VZ +3.9%, AJG +3.5%, ABCB +3.3%, VOR +2.3%, MNOV +2.3%, SIGI +2.3%, TSLA +2.2%, SYK +2.1%, CMRC +1.9%, DCI +1.8%, FLG +1.8%, APD +1.6%, AROC +1.2%, ORC +1.2%, VERI +1.1%, ORRF +1.1%, FHI +1.1%, HOOD +0.9%
  • Gapping down:
    • BNAI -35.9%, PFSI -26.4%, SNDR -18.4%, MXL -14.6%, CVCO -12.6%, APPF -11.2%, OLN -10%, BZH -9.6%, KLAC -8.5%, ALV -7.4%, LXRX -6.9%, SSRM -6.8%, KYIV -6.1%, OR -5.8%, RR -4.2%, TBBK -4%, ARCB -3.9%, VEON -3.6%, WDC -3%, PZG -2.9%, VOYG -2.8%, DXC -2.8%, RKLB -2.7%, SKYW -2.5%, KRMD -2.4%, OSIS -2.4%, AON -2.3%, LPLA -2.2%, XOM -2.2%, SEZL -2.1%, ABAT -1.9%, AEC -1.9%, EMN -1.9%, MTX -1.9%, META -1.6%, MRNA -1.6%, SENS -1.6%, PCVX -1.6%, REGN -1.6%, FRMI -1.4%, TFSL -1.3%, V -1.3%, LYB -1.3%, GPRK -1.2%, TER -1.1%, LPG -1.1%, HZO -1%, DLB -1%, SXI -1%, PII -0.9%, SCHW -0.9%, VFS -0.9%, NAVN -0.8%, AMZN -0.8%. AAPL -0.5%

>>> US Gapping down

Gapping down
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:
  • PFSI -21.8%, SNDR -19.3%, MXL -14.8%, CVCO -12.6%, APPF -11.7%, BZH -10.2%, OLN -8.7%, KLAC -7.9%, ALV -5.8%, TBBK -4%, ARCB -3.9%, SKYW -3.2%, DXC -2.8%, OSIS -2.4%, LPLA -2.2%, WDC -2.2% (also intends to monetize its 7.5 mln SNDK shares before the one year anniversary of the separation), EMN -1.9%, MTX -1.9%, REGN -1.7%, XOM -1.5%, V -1.1%, DLB -1%, SXI -1%, NMR -1%
Other news:
  • BNAI -28.2% (secures $1.518 mln premium private placement at $63.25 a share, strengthens balance sheet with $818k in warrant proceeds, full debt repayment)
  • LXRX -9.7% (prices offering of 32.0 mln shares of common stock at $1.30 per share; also also provides updated disclosures to potential investors)
  • SSRM -5.7% (announces Hod Maden Technical Report Summary with $1.66B NPV5% and 39% IRR)
  • KYIV -5% (prices secondary offering of 12.5 mln shares of common stock at $10.50 per share)
  • OR -4.4% (acquires additional 1.0% NSR royalty)
  • RR -3.7% (closes $38.7 million at-the-market private placement)
  • VEON -3.6% (prices secondary offering of 12.1 mln shares of common stock at $10.50 per share)
  • GRAL -1.9% (submits FDA premarket approval application for Galleri multi-cancer early detection test)
  • AEC -1.9% (amends credit facility with Extract Advisors)
  • PCVX -1.6% (prices offering of 11.0 mln shares of common stock at $50.00 per share)
  • FRMI -1.5% (admits additional common shares and updated total voting rights)
  • SEZL -1.4% (CFO to retire; names new CFO)
  • META -1.3% (U.S. investigating claims that WhatsApp chats are not private, according to Bloomberg)
  • GPRK -1.2% (announces acquisition of Frontera Energy's Colombian E&P assets)
  • HZO -1% (files for $300 mln mixed securities shelf offering)
  • ALT -0.8% (prices offering of 17,045,454 shares of its common stock for gross proceeds of $75 mln)

>>> US Gapping up

Gapping up
In reaction to earnings/guidance
:
  • SNDK +22.4% (also extends JV with Kioxia; also WDC intends to monetize its 7.5 mln SNDK shares before the one year anniversary of the separation), DECK +12.9%, RHI +7.8%, RMD +6.8%, CHTR +3.9%, AJG +3.5%, ABCB +3.3%, FLG +3%, VZ +2.4%, SIGI +2.3%, LYB +2.1%, CACC +1.9%, SYK +1.9%, CL +1.8%, FHI +1.1%
Other news:
  • GCL +51.4% (subsidiary 4Divinity received an additional $10.0 mln strategic investment from ADATA Technology)
  • TBN +6% (stock offering by selling shareholders)
  • USAR +5.1% (Director bought 100000 shares worth $2.14 mln)
  • VOR +2.5% (stock offering by selling shareholders)
  • TSLA +2.5% (SpaceX is considering a potential merger with Tesla as well as an alternative combination with xAI, according to Bloomberg)
  • CMRC +1.9% (expands partnership with Stripe)
  • DCI +1.8% (names new CEO)
  • VERI +1.1% (major expansion of Veritone Data Refinery suppliers)
  • ORRF +1.1% (files for $200 mln mixed securities shelf offering)
  • AROC +1.1% (increases dividend)
  • HOOD +1% (US could give HOOD a key role in managing "Trump Accounts" for children, according to Bloomberg)
  • AZN +0.9% (expands weight management portfolio through CSPC Pharmaceuticals collaboration)