Barrons : A Freight Glut Is Coming. Shippers Are in for a Long Haul.

A Freight Glut Is Coming. Shippers Are in for a Long Haul.

Remember the supply-chain snarls? Cargo ships anchored for weeks outside the ports of Long Beach and Rotterdam?

That all seems so 2021 now—not least to the shareholders of big shipping companies such as A.P. Moeller-Maersk (ticker: MAERSKA.Denmark) and Hapag-Lloyd (HLAG.Germany).

Oceangoing container freight is an unsung hero of the globalization age. Before its invention in 1956, shipping could account for half or more of the price of international goods, says John McCown, a senior fellow at the U.S. Center for Maritime Security. Today it’s more like 2%.

Shipping costs were also an underestimated factor in postpandemic inflation. Container rates jumped sevenfold in the 18 months prior to September 2021, which notionally added 1.5 percentage points to global inflation in 2022, according to the International Monetary Fund. Not a small number.

Shippers’ bottom lines and stock prices rode the boom. “The industry made unfantasized-about profits,” McCown says.

The bust followed just as swiftly. Rates are back down to 2019 levels. Maersk shares have fallen 40% from a peak in January 2022.

Worse is probably yet to come, with durable goods spending flattening in the U.S. and Europe and merchants looking to unload inventories before placing fresh orders to Asia. China’s exports plunged more than 14% in July from a year ago.

“The destocking cycle will go on into Q1 or Q2 of next year,” says Sathish Sivakumar, head of European transport research at Citi. “That means more downside in freight rates.”

Panama Canal’s Jam
The industry gave way to irrational exuberance during its boomlet, commissioning new ships on an unprecedented scale. Vessels on order will add 30% to global container freight capacity over the next three to four years, says Niels Rasmussen, chief shipping analyst at Copenhagen-based trade group Bimco. Two privately owned companies, Swiss-based Mediterranean Shipping Company and CMA CGM in France led the extravagance—but everyone will struggle with the glut.

Bulk shipping, which carries commodities, boasts a different cast of characters than container freight. Price trajectories have been similar.

Container shippers do have ways to staunch their financial bleeding. The lucrative trans-Pacific routes are dominated by three alliances, which can informally coordinate on trimming the number of sailings or “slow steaming,” reducing ships’ speed to save on fuel and cut the frequency of deliveries. Vessels could slow down by up to 25%, infuriating customers but bolstering finances, Rasmussen estimates.

“It’s a cartel that has great appreciation for what can happen when capacity becomes constrained,” McCown summarizes.

Most of the new ships in the pipeline are cost-efficient monsters of the deep, larger than an aircraft carrier and carrying up to 18,000 20-foot containers. They’ll replace smaller, fuel-guzzling craft. Shippers normally mothball 5% of their fleet every year, offsetting the coming supply bulge, McCown says.

Still, no less an authority than Maersk CEO Vincent Clerc sees choppy seas ahead. “Most of the orders are still in the shipyard, so we have a long haul in front of us,” he told journalists while reporting a 70% drop in year-over-year earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or Ebitda, for the second quarter of 2023. “We will need to adapt to the new market situation over the next 18 months.”

Bad news for Maersk and its competitors is good news for most of the world, which waits with bated breath for inflation to fall and central banks to cut rates before they cause recessions. Powell, Lagarde & Co. can at least count shipping costs as cooled for a while yet.

Barrons : NextEra Offers a Smart Bet on Green Energy and a Rising Payout

NextEra Offers a Smart Bet on Green Energy and a Rising Payout

Wall Street has been captivated by the growth potential of green energy, from wind and solar power to hydrogen, renewable fuels, and carbon sequestration. NextEra Energy offers a relatively low-risk green play, with a 2.7% dividend yield that’s rising.

The largest U.S. electric utility, with a market value of $138 billion, NextEra (ticker: NEE) has two businesses: It owns the leading portfolio of wind- and solar-power assets in the U.S., and one of the country’s biggest, best-run utilities, Florida Power & Light.

NextEra’s shares have outperformed the S&P 500SPX –0.11% index in the past 10 years, a rarity among utilities. But the stock, which peaked in late 2021 at $93 a share, has lagged behind more recently, falling 18% this year, to a recent $68.

NextEra trades at a premium to peers such as Southern Co. (SO) and Duke Energy (DUK), but that gap has contracted as the stock’s forward price/earnings multiple has fallen from a high around 30. Shares now fetch 22 times projected 2023 earnings of $3.12 a share and 20 times next year’s estimated income of $3.40 a share.

The company sees 6% to 8% annual earnings growth in 2025 and ’26, and said last month in its second-quarter earnings slide deck that it would be “disappointed if we are not able to deliver financial results at or near the top of our adjusted EPS [earnings per share] expectations ranges through 2026.” That implies roughly $4 a share in earnings in 2026. Most peers are aiming for earnings growth of closer to 6% annually. NextEra’s 2024 earnings are expected to rise 9%.

“[NextEra] owns one of the fastest-growing utilities in the country and has some of the most constructive regulation,” says John Bartlett, president of Reaves Asset Management, which runs the Reaves Utility IncomeUTG +0.33% closed-end fund (UTG). Bartlett says the Inflation Reduction Act and its raft of subsidies and incentives for renewable energy is another positive for the company.

Wolfe Research analyst Steve Fleishman recently wrote that NextEra has the “best-in-class, high-growth utility,” the “dominant” renewables development in the U.S., and one of the strongest balance sheets in the sector. He rates the stock Outperform and has an $89 price target, based on a sum-of-the-parts analysis.

NextEra’s dividend is low relative to Duke Energy and Southern, which yield about 4%. The industry average is 3.5%. But the payout has risen by an industry-beating 10% annually since 2007, and the company sees 10% yearly growth at least through 2024.

NextEra’s Florida Power & Light has 5.8 million customers. Florida’s favorable population outlook bodes well for growth. The utility is spending heavily to decarbonize its generating fleet and build related infrastructure. Capital expenditures are projected to be about $9 billion this year.

One of FP&L’s big initiatives is to deploy solar to replace natural gas, which now accounts for 71% of its generation capacity. It aims to have carbon-free generation by 2045, in part by pairing battery storage with solar.

Under former CEO Jim Robo, NextEra was early in developing wind and solar energy and now has about 27 gigawatts of clean-energy generating capacity, ahead of No. 2–ranked Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A, BRK.B). The renewables business is housed in an unregulated unit, NextEra Energy Resources, and a portion sits in NextEra Energy Partners (NEP), more than 50% owned by NextEra.

Most of the company’s renewable generating capacity is in wind, but much of its current backlog of 20 gigawatts is in solar and energy storage.

Robo never warmed to developing offshore wind power on the East Coast, citing lengthy development timelines and uncertain permitting, among other drawbacks. It is “terrible energy policy” and expensive, he said in 2018, comments that look smart given the deteriorating economics of offshore wind. NextEra sees its advantage in renewables stemming from its 20 years of experience, a superior land position, better supplier relationships, and a strong balance sheet.

NextEra’s stock has fallen as interest rates have risen, dimming investors’ interest in utilities. The sector’s dividend yields look less attractive relative to cash than they did a year ago. In renewable power, there are fears about rising costs and regulatory barriers, and growing local opposition in many parts of the country that has slowed deployment in the past year.

In addition, Florida Power & Light has been the subject of news articles that its executives funneled money to Florida politicians to protect its interests. The former CEO of FP&L retired in January, and NextEra has launched two investigations into the matter. NextEra CEO John Ketchum said on the January earnings call that there was no connection between the executive’s departure and the company’s probes. NextEra declined to comment for this story.

Rate and regulatory risks are largely reflected in NextEra’s valuation. At its current, depressed price, the stock offers an attractive play on two industry-leading companies under one corporate roof, both with significant growth potential.

>>> Starboard Value (Jeffrey Smith) discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: Confirms new AQN ABCM positions, Increased WIX, Exited ENOV ON LZM


Starboard Value (Jeffrey Smith) discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: Confirms new AQN ABCM positions, Increased WIX, Exited ENOV ON LZM

Highlights from Q2 2023 filing as compared to Q1 2023:
  • New positions in: AQN (~34.1 mln shares), ABCM (~4.59 mln)
  • Increased positions in: WIX (to ~3.79 mln shares from ~1.97 mln shares), HUM (to 885K from 800K)
  • Maintained positions in: GEN (~18.9 mln shares), GDDY (~10.0 mln), LPSN (2.36 mln)
  • Closed positions in: ENOV (from ~0.35 mln shares), ON (from ~0.2 mln), LZM (from ~0.48 mln)
  • Decreased positions in: ACM (to ~3.8 mln shares from ~5.4 mln shares), CVLT (to ~0.12 mln from ~1.6 mln), WTW (to ~0.5 mln from ~1.8 mln), MRCY (to ~2.8 mln from ~3.8 mln), VRT (to ~15.9 mln from ~16.8 mln), CRM (to ~2 mln from ~2.5 mln), SPLK (to ~4.1 mln from ~4.6 mln), PZZA (to ~0.2 mln from ~0.6 mln), ROG (to ~0.77 mln from ~1 mln)

>>> Baupost Group (Seth Klarman) discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New AMZN DG UNP CRH positions


Baupost Group (Seth Klarman) discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New AMZN DG UNP CRH positions

Highlights from Q2 2023 filing as compared to Q1 2023:
  • New positions in: AMZN (~964K), DG (242K), UNP (175K), CRH (~57K)
  • Increased positions in: FIS (to ~6.8 mln shares from ~4.8 mln shares), ATRA (to ~9.8 mln from ~9.1 mln), STX (to 600K from ~137K), SSNC (to ~3.7 mln from ~3.3 mln), JAZZ (to ~674K from ~479K) WTW (to ~902K from ~859K)
  • Maintained positions: VSAT (~16.3 mln shares), LSXMK (~14.9 mln), VRTV (~3.3 mln)
  • Closed positions in: DBRG (from ~1.2 mln shares), SWKS (from ~0.7 mln), FI (from ~0.5 mln), LAD (from ~0.07 mln)
  • Decreased positions in: TBPH (to ~7.4 mln shares from ~10.4 mln shares), LBTYK (to ~45 mln from ~47.5 mln), QRVO (to ~2.6 mln from ~4.65 mln), FNCH (to ~0.07 mln from ~2 mln), GOOG (to ~4.1 mln from ~5.85 mln), EDU (to ~4.1 mln from ~5.4 mln), ADV (to ~10.7 mln from ~11 mln)

>>> Soros Fund discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New GM CRH RNR BABA MBLY positions; Exited FHN BOWL FRSH CRM positions


Soros Fund discloses updated portfolio positions in 13F filing: New GM CRH RNR BABA MBLY positions; Exited FHN BOWL FRSH CRM positions

Highlights from Q2 2023 filing as compared to Q1 2023:
  • New positions in: GM (~0.45 mln shares), CRH (~0.35 mln), RNR (~0.19 mln), BABA (~0.18 mln), MBLY (~0.12 mln), SVV (~0.1 mln), BFH (~0.09 mln), PYPL (~0.08 mln)
  • Increased positions in: LQD (to ~3.17 mln shares from ~2.4 mln shares), RIVN (to ~4.2 mln from ~3.6 mln), KWEB (to ~1.17 mln from ~0.82 mln), AER (to ~0.84 mln from ~0.54 mln), BGC (to ~2.7 mln from ~2.5 mln), APTV (to ~0.33 mln from ~0.18 mln), RKT (to ~0.3 mln from ~0.2 mln) DASH (to ~0.14 mln from ~0.07 mln), AMZN (to ~0.77 mln from ~0.71 mln), TMUS (to ~0.09 mln from ~0.03 mln)
  • Closed positions in: FHN (from ~7.31 mln shares), BOWL (from ~3 mln), FRSH (from ~1.43 mln), AWK (from ~0.32 mln), CRM (from ~0.17 mln), EL (from ~0.16 mln), FRPT (from ~0.1 mln), PR (from ~0.1 mln)
  • Decreased positions in: FIGS (to ~0.2 mln shares from ~2 mln shares), INDI (to ~2.99 mln from ~3.24 mln), FSLY (to ~1 mln from ~1.2 mln), CSX (to ~0.3 mln from ~0.36 mln), UBER (to ~0.75 mln from ~0.82 mln), GOOS (to ~0.1 mln from ~0.15 mln), LPLA (to ~0.13 mln from ~0.18 mln), QCOM (to ~0.07 mln from ~0.1 mln)

>>> US Close Dow 0,30% S&P -0,11% Nasdaq -0,67%


Closing Stock Market Summary

The stock market closed out the first full week of August on a mixed note in a lightly traded session. Market rates jumped in response to a hotter than expected PPI report for July, which created an excuse for investors to continue consolidation efforts that started this month following the stellar start to the year.

Total PPI increased 0.3% month-over-month in July (Briefing.com consensus +0.2%) following a downwardly revised 0.0% (from 0.1%) for June. Excluding food and energy, the index for final demand was also up 0.3% month-over-month (Briefing.com consensus +0.2%) following a downwardly revised 0.1% decline (from +0.1%) for June.

On a year-over-year basis, the index for final demand was up 0.8%, versus 0.3% in June, and the index for final demand, excluding food and energy, was up 2.4%, unchanged from June.

The 2-yr note yield, at 4.80% just before the release, rose six basis points to 4.89%. The 10-yr note yield, at 4.08% just before the release, rose nine basis points to 4.17%.

Weak mega cap stocks acted as a drag on the major indices, leading the S&P 500 and Nasdaq to close with losses while the Dow Jones Industrial Average registered a gain. The Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) fell 0.6% while the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) closed flat.

Apple (APPL 177.79, +0.06, +0.03%) eked out a slim gain, but weakness from the likes of Tesla (TSLA 242.65, -2.69, -1.1%), Meta Platforms (META 301.70, -4.04, -1.3%), and NVIDIA (NVDA 408.55, -15.33, -3.6%) kept the broader market in check. 

The S&P 500 declined 0.1%; the Nasdaq Composite fell 0.7%; and the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.3%. Market breadth also reflected mixed action under the index surface. Advancers led decliners by a slim margin at the NYSE while decliners led advancers by a 4-to-3 margin at the Nasdaq.

Only four of the 11 S&P 500 sectors closed with a loss. Information technology (-0.9%) was the worst performer by a decent margin while energy (+1.6%) led the pack.

  • Nasdaq Composite: +30.4% YTD
  • S&P 500: +16.3% YTD
  • S&P Midcap 400: +9.5% YTD
  • Russell 2000: +9.3% YTD
  • Dow Jones Industrial Average: +6.3% YTD

Reviewing today's economic data:

  • July PPI 0.3% (consensus 0.2%); Prior was revised to 0.0% from 0.1%; July Core PPI 0.3% (consensus 0.2%); Prior was revised to -0.1% from 0.1%
    • The key takeaway from the report is that wholesale inflation has come down sharply from its peak in 2022, although with the recent increase in oil and gasoline prices, there will be some concern that further improvement is going to be delayed.
  • August Univ. of Michigan Consumer Sentiment - Prelim 71.2 (consensus 70.9); Prior 71.6
    • The key takeaway from the report is that it reflected little overall change in sentiment, due in part to largely steady inflation expectations, as year-ahead and five-year expectations decreased by ten basis points apiece.

There is no U.S. economic data of note on Monday.

Le Monde : l’arrivée de Kretinsky chez Atos soulève l’opposition de parlemen



L’arrivée de Daniel Kretinsky chez Atos soulève l’opposition de parlementaires et d’actionnaires
Des sénateurs s’inquiètent de l’entrée de l’homme d’affaires tchèque au capital de la division de cybersécurité du groupe d’informatique, très liée à la défense française.

Pour ces 82 sénateurs et députés, c’en est trop. Ayant encore en tête la vente, en janvier, de la société de défense Exxelia à l’américain Heico, ces élus, tous issus du parti Les Républicains, craignent que le projet de rachat par Daniel Kretinsky (actionnaire indirect du Monde) des activités infogérance d’Atos et son entrée au capital de sa division de cybersécurité, Eviden, entaillent un peu plus la souveraineté française. « Cette entreprise qui demeure clé pour notre autonomie stratégique actuelle, au travers des capacités de calcul, et de demain, avec les enjeux liés au quantique, doit être absolument maintenue sous le giron français », ont-ils écrit le 2 août, dans une tribune au Figaro.

Eviden assure plusieurs missions pour la défense nationale. Par exemple, son logiciel Digital Battle Management System sert de base au système d’information du programme Scorpion de modernisation des capacités de combat au contact de l’armée de terre. Elle a également créé Athea, une coentreprise avec Thales, pour travailler sur la future « infostructure » régalienne du ministère des armées. Quant à ses supercalculateurs, fabriqués dans son usine d’Angers, ils servent au programme de simulation des essais nucléaires. « L’hypothèse de voir un acteur étranger si puissant s’approcher de nos capacités militaires ultrasensibles mérite toute notre attention », écrit le groupe de parlementaires.

« Cessons de brader nos fleurons et de nous fragiliser », poursuit Cédric Perrin, vice-président de la commission des affaires étrangères et de la défense du Sénat, à l’origine de la tribune. Sénateur du Territoire de Belfort, bastion d’Alstom, il reste marqué par la vente de la branche énergie de l’industriel à l’américain General Electric en 2015, avant que l’Etat ne se rende compte de son erreur et rachète en 2022, par l’intermédiaire d’EDF, ses activités nucléaires, dont les turbines Arabelle qui équipent les centrales françaises.

Pas de passage devant le contrôle des investissements étrangers

Après Casino, et en plus de ses activités dans les médias et l’énergie, M. Perrin s’étonne que le gouvernement laisse M. Kretinsky « racheter le tissu économique français par appartement ». En ne prenant que 7,5 % du capital d’Eviden, l’homme d’affaires tchèque s’évite le passage devant le contrôle des investissements étrangers, le seuil déclenchant un examen des services du ministère de l’économie étant fixé à 10 % du capital.

Le 3 août, un porte-parole de M. Kretinsky a jugé « légitime la préoccupation des parlementaires, mais elle repose sur une hypothèse qui ne se vérifiera pas ». Selon lui, l’homme d’affaires entend maintenir une participation « minoritaire » et « passive » au capital d’Eviden. Pour Atos, le choix d’accorder 7,5 % du capital d’Eviden à M. Krestinky répondrait à la volonté de construire un bloc d’actionnaires de long terme. Il est prévu que Fimalac, la holding de Marc Ladreit de Lacharrière, qui épaule déjà M. Kretinsky dans le dossier Casino, entre aussi au capital d’Eviden. Atos et Bercy n’ont pas fait de commentaire.

Les actionnaires d’Atos mécontents

Les sénateurs ne sont pas les seuls mécontents : l’opération déplaît aussi à des actionnaires d’Atos, certains d’entre eux ayant décidé de former l’Udaac, l’Union des actionnaires d’Atos en colère. Depuis l’annonce de l’accord avec M. Kretinsky, le 1er août, l’action du groupe d’informatique a perdu près d’un quart de sa valeur. La transaction est jugée défavorable à la société : ses activités d’infogérance ne sont vendues que contre 100 millions d’euros. La holding de M. Kretinsky reprend à sa charge 1,9 milliard d’euros d’engagements mais toute la dette d’Atos, soit 2,3 milliards d’euros, sera conservée par Eviden.

Avant même l’annonce de cette transaction, la société de gestion Sycomore AM, qui avait tenté d’obtenir le départ du président d’Atos, Bertrand Meunier, lors de l’assemblée générale du 28 juin, avait jeté l’éponge en vendant toutes ses actions. Déçu de ne pas avoir obtenu gain de cause, Sycomore regrettait aussi que la détérioration de la génération de trésorerie d’Atos, information importante révélée aux actionnaires lors de l’annonce des résultats semestriels, le 28 juillet, n’ait pas été communiquée plus tôt.

FT : Weight-loss drugs: will health systems and insurers pay for ‘skinny jabs’?

Weight-loss drugs: will health systems and insurers pay for ‘skinny jabs’?
A new study bolsters the case that semaglutide is not merely a vanity drug but has a key role to play in treating obesity

When Jimmy Kimmel hosted the Academy Awards this year, the comedian opened by telling the audience how great they looked. Then he stung: “When I look around this room, I can’t help but wonder, ‘Is Ozempic right for me?’”

Kimmel was needling Hollywood for its newfound dependence on the diabetes medication that spurs weight loss, which has reportedly become de rigueur among the wealthy and famous. 

Novo Nordisk, the company behind semaglutide — branded as Ozempic for diabetes and Wegovy for weight loss — has benefited from a surge in demand from patients inspired by celebrities’ transformations. But the drug’s reputation as a “skinny jab” has not helped persuade health systems and insurers, or payers, to cover the cost of it. 

This week, the Danish drugmaker published headline trial data that it believes will make the difference. In a trial of patients with obesity and cardiac conditions, Wegovy was shown to cut the risk of serious events such as heart attacks and strokes by 20 per cent, proving that the drug improves heart health — and has the potential to reduce high healthcare costs. 

Lars Fruergaard Jørgensen, Novo Nordisk’s chief executive, tells the Financial Times that the “whole reason” the company did the trial was to help win the argument with payers.

Shares in the company and its main rival, the US pharma group Eli Lilly, shot to record highs, as investors hoped that payers would not be able to refuse to cover the drugs for much longer. Evan Seigerman, an analyst at the Canadian investment bank BMO, added tens of billions of dollars to his sales estimates for the weight loss and diabetes drugs after the announcement. He now forecasts the entire market will one day be worth $130bn to $140bn. 


Drugmakers believe the medicines will help save on the healthcare costs related to obesity, which add up to about $170bn a year in the US, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

However, health insurers and public payers argue that they have no way to magic up the money to pay for the drugs that would be needed to cater to a potential market of tens of millions of patients in the US alone, at a list price of about $1,300 a month, for the rest of their lives.

James Gelfand, president of the ERISA Industry Committee, which represents large US employers that provide health benefits, says the conflict is taking over his LinkedIn feed. 

“It’s a war zone between patient advocates and doctors who are extolling the virtues of these drugs, and then plan sponsors, administrators, actuaries, etc, who are saying these drugs are a massive profiteering scheme,” he says. 

Health effects
After decades of drugs that either offered lacklustre weight loss, or serious side effects, semaglutide was a breakthrough for the treatment of obesity.

First developed to treat diabetes, the compound was trialled by Novo in patients with obesity who were not diabetics. Results published in 2021 showed participants taking the weekly injection lost an average of about 15 per cent of their body weight, compared to about 2 per cent with just diet and exercise.

The next year, a trial showed that Eli Lilly’s similar drug tirzepatide could help patients on the highest dose lose an average of 22.5 per cent of their body weight. Tirzepatide is not yet approved for obesity, though the same active ingredient is available branded as Mounjaro, for diabetes. 

The drugs have side effects — most commonly nausea and gastrointestinal problems — and in animal studies, Wegovy increased the risk of thyroid cancer. But many people frustrated with not being able to lose weight solely through diet and exercise were prepared to put up with these risks to finally see an impact on their size and their health. 

While many clinicians presumed the drugs would improve heart health because obesity is a major risk factor for heart disease, Novo Nordisk invested in its largest ever trial — following over 17,000 people since 2018 — to obtain proof. 

The initial result was “out of this world”, says Martin Lange, executive vice-president of development for Novo Nordisk. The data from trials suggests the drug is not just having an impact by helping people lose weight, he says, but also by lowering blood pressure, changing the balance of lipids in the blood, and reducing inflammation.

He adds that this significant impact on people who already have heart disease suggests that the drug may also help cut the risk for people who have not yet developed it.

The full study, which will be released at an academic conference and is yet to be peer reviewed, will also show the drug’s impact on 28 other factors, including on other expensive conditions such as kidney disease. 

Analysts believe the trial could also help build confidence that the benefits of the drug outweigh the risks, after the European regulator began investigating reports of patients having suicidal thoughts, and a US lawsuit claiming that Novo and Lilly’s diabetes drugs cause “stomach paralysis”. Lange says the heart trial showed no causal link with suicidal ideation or thyroid cancer. Novo and Lilly have said patient safety is their top priority. 

Novo hopes that being armed with this data will help it overcome the competition when Lilly enters the obesity market with its own medication, which is in the same category of so-called GLP-1 receptor agonists.

But Lilly believes Novo’s data will also help it sell its weight loss drug, even though the results of its comparable trial won’t be ready until 2027. On an earnings call this week, Lilly’s president of diabetes, Mike Mason, declared it a “fantastic day for people living with obesity”. 

“It is an important milestone in a long-term goal to get broad access for anti-obesity medications,” he said. 

The question of coverage
Despite Wegovy’s sudden ubiquity in popular culture, less than half of all US commercial insurers cover the weight loss drug. Medicare, the government-backed insurance for seniors, is prohibited by Congress from paying for any obesity medications.

In Europe, where supply problems mean Novo Nordisk is only just slowly starting to launch the drug, public health systems are restricting who qualifies for it. The UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice), for example, will pay for it for patients at the higher end of the body mass index, who already have at least one weight-related condition, and then for only two years, despite evidence showing that if you stop taking the drug, you regain weight. 

After the heart trial data, financial analysts believe this reluctance will have to change. BMO’s Seigerman says not covering a drug that is potentially life-saving will be “unethical”. 

“Before the data, a lot of these weight loss drugs were seen as vanity, no one was treating obesity as a medical condition, a precursor to negative health outcomes,” he explains. “If you have cancer, they are not going to deny you a cancer drug. Now, you’re going to treat obesity as a medical condition.” 

Novo Nordisk’s Jørgensen says that with broader coverage, the company hopes to reach more patients with the highest BMIs and comorbidities, even though “some of the less fortunate individuals will not be able to pay out of pocket”. 

Novo and other drugmakers have been lobbying Congress to pass a law reversing the ban on Medicare coverage of drugs designed to address obesity. Seigerman is optimistic that the new data will eventually help pass the law, because it will prove that it will save Medicare money in the long run, on hospitalisations for heart attacks and strokes. 

Stacie Dusetzina, professor of health policy at Vanderbilt University, says it is “incredibly difficult” for legislation to pass through Congress at the moment. But she said the fact that Medicare does cover semaglutide for treatment of diabetes suggests that, after the new data, it could cover the drug for people with cardiac conditions. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services did not respond to a request for comment. 

In the UK, Jørgensen says Nice could be willing to expand coverage when a trial shows the health benefits go beyond two years. 

Trained as a health economist, he says the drugs could help not just save healthcare costs but also get people back to work. “If you can turn them back from being consumers of healthcare services to consume less of those and actually be active in the workforce and taxpayers, that economic model would be very beneficial for most typical European societies where healthcare is funded by tax payments,” he says. 

‘Very hard to justify’ 
But for insurers and health systems, the conundrum has barely changed.

David Rind, chief medical officer at the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, a non-profit that estimates fair prices for the US health system, says he does not think the heart trial has changed the ethics of not covering the drugs.

ICER’s cost effectiveness assessment concluded they represented low long-term value for money — and it already assumed the obesity medications had some cardiac benefit. 

The biggest problem is the sheer number of people who could qualify for the drug: at current prices, ICER estimated that only 0.1 per cent could be treated within five years without “major budget disruptions” for the insurers. 

“The options are to move money away from other healthcare, raise premiums, or taxes if you’re the government, or manufacturers could lower the price to a cost effective price and still make enormous amounts of money because enormous numbers of patients want this,” Rind says. 

Drugmakers will be reluctant to offer big discounts on such a popular drug, but the opacity of the US drug pricing system means they could do deals to offer larger rebates if volumes increase.

Gelfand, who represents large US employers that provide health benefits, says the price tag is still “very hard to justify”, particularly given patients have to take the drug for life. He expects employers to stick to covering very narrow patient groups, if any at all.

Otherwise, he says, premiums in the US could rise 15 to 20 per cent, increasing the likelihood that healthy people stop buying insurance, and making the remaining population riskier to cover. 

A single heart trial was never likely to change payers’ position on the drugs overnight, and even if it had, Novo Nordisk would not have enough of the drug to supply the world.

But it could be the first in a series of data releases that proves how weight loss drugs prevent the serious consequences of obesity — eventually reshaping not just patients, but also the healthcare industry and the broader economy.

Emily Field, an analyst at Barclays, says that the benefits of the drugs are “only just starting to be understood” and eventually, doctors will become used to treating obesity before other health problems develop.

“This is like the smartphone, it is going to change society in a big way,” she says. “This trial is a huge validation that it is not just cosmetic.”

>>> US Research Calls

Research Calls

  • Upgrades:
    • AIA Group (AAGIY) upgraded to Overweight from Neutral at JP Morgan
    • Alibaba (BABA) upgraded to Buy from Hold at DZ Bank; tgt $120
    • Cogent Communications (CCOI) upgraded to Outperform from Market Perform at TD Cowen
    • Despegar.com (DESP) upgraded to Overweight from Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; tgt raised to $13
    • DigitalOcean (DOCN) upgraded to Equal-Weight from Underweight at Morgan Stanley; tgt lowered to $103
    • Henkel AG (HENKY) upgraded to Hold from Sell at Berenberg
    • Himax Tech (HIMX) upgraded to Outperform from Neutral at Credit Suisse; tgt $8
    • Hubbell (HUBB) upgraded to Peer Perform from Underperform at Wolfe Research
    • Pinnacle West (PNW) upgraded to In-line from Underperform at Evercore ISI; tgt $78
    • Petrobras (PBR) upgraded to Neutral from Sell at UBS
    • Quebecor (QBCRF) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Canaccord Genuity
    • Rigetti Computing (RGTI) upgraded to Buy from Hold at The Benchmark Company; tgt $4
    • Rivian Automotive (RIVN) upgraded to Outperform from Neutral at Exane BNP Paribas; tgt $30
    • Sabra Health Care REIT (SBRA) upgraded to Neutral from Underperform at BofA Securities; tgt raised to $14
    • Twilio (TWLO) upgraded to Buy from Hold at Argus; tgt $72
  • Downgrades:
    • Brookfield Corp. (BN) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Canaccord Genuity
    • Canadian Tire Corporation (CDNAF) downgraded to Sector Perform from Outperform at National Bank Financial
    • Cano Health (CANO) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Citigroup; tgt lowered to $0.80
    • Forward Air (FWRD) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Stifel; tgt lowered to $103
    • Forward Air (FWRD) downgraded to Mkt Perform from Strong Buy at Raymond James
    • Forward Air (FWRD) downgraded to Underperform from Peer Perform at Wolfe Research; tgt $80
    • Heritage Commerce Corp. (HTBK) downgraded to Equal-Weight from Overweight at Stephens; tgt $10
    • Kezar Life Sciences (KZR) downgraded to Equal Weight from Overweight at Wells Fargo; tgt $4
    • Lucid Group (LCID) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at Exane BNP Paribas; tgt $5
    • Medical Properties Trust (MPW) downgraded to Underperform from Neutral at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $8
    • Medical Properties Trust (MPW) downgraded to Underperform from Strong Buy at Raymond James
    • Olaplex (OLPX) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Canaccord Genuity; tgt lowered to $3
    • Origin Materials (ORGN) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Craig Hallum; tgt $2
    • Sealed Air (SEE) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at UBS; tgt $44
    • SLR Capital Partners (SLRC) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Ladenburg Thalmann
    • Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) downgraded to Underperform from Peer Perform at Wolfe Research; tgt $94
    • Triumph Group (TGI) downgraded to Underperform from Buy at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $8
    • Ventas (VTR) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at BofA Securities; tgt lowered to $48
    • Western Midstream (WES) downgraded to Equal Weight from Overweight at Wells Fargo; tgt lowered to $30
    • Wolverine (WWW) downgraded to Hold from Buy at Williams Trading; tgt lowered to $12
    • Wolverine (WWW) downgraded to Neutral from Buy at Seaport Research Partners
    • Wolverine (WWW) downgraded to Neutral from Outperform at Exane BNP Paribas; tgt $9
  • Others:
    • Cisco (CSCO) placed on positive catalyst watch at Citigroup
    • CymaBay Therapeutics (CBAY) initiated with a Buy at Guggenheim; tgt $20
    • Expeditors Intl (EXPD) initiated with an Underweight at JP Morgan; tgt $110
    • HCI Group (HCI) initiated with a Mkt Perform at William Blair
    • Hippo (HIPO) initiated with a Mkt Perform at William Blair
    • Kura Oncology (KURA) initiated with a Buy at BofA Securities; tgt $31
    • Madison Square Garden Entertainment (MSGE) initiated with a Neutral at JP Morgan; tgt $38
    • MercadoLibre (MELI) resumed with a Buy at William O'Neil
    • PROCEPT BioRobotics (PRCT) initiated with an Overweight at Piper Sandler; tgt $42
    • Towne Bank (TOWN) initiated with a Market Perform at Hovde Group; tgt $27