FT : China’s exports tumble as trade woes persist

China’s exports tumble as trade woes persist
Struggling manufacturing sector fails to lift growth in world’s second-biggest economy

China’s exports fell 8.8 per cent in August compared with a year earlier, marking their fourth consecutive month of decline in another hit for the ailing manufacturing sector in the world’s second-largest economy.

The August contraction was less severe than a forecast fall of 9.2 per cent, according to analysts polled by Reuters, and better than a decline in July, when China’s exports shed 14.5 per cent, the worst since the start of the pandemic.

Imports dropped 7.3 per cent in August, compared with a Reuters forecast of a 9 per cent decline and a 12.4 per cent fall in July.

The sustained weakness in trade comes as Chinese policymakers are grappling with turmoil in the property sector, one of the country’s other main engines of economic growth.

Chinese trade buoyed economic activity during the country’s pandemic lockdowns, but exporters have struggled this year with high global inflation as western consumers cut back on electronics purchases.

Policymakers in Beijing have refrained from enacting sweeping stimulus measures to revive growth in the economy, which lagged in the second quarter.

Trade turbulence and property sector woes, combined with sluggish consumer sentiment, led prices to fall in July. Factory activity slowed for a fifth consecutive month in August.

China’s official economic growth target for this year is 5 per cent, the lowest such mark in decades.

FT : China’s ‘piecemeal’ stimulus plan stirs hope in property market

China’s ‘piecemeal’ stimulus plan stirs hope in property market
Beijing seeks to rekindle growth in economically crucial sector but investors remain cautious

For Beijing-based real estate agent Xue, deals have bounced back over the past week in the wake of government measures aimed at propping up the country’s stumbling property sector and the broader economy.

“The inventory of available properties is decreasing daily,” said Xue, who asked to be identified by one name, adding there were signs that after a long period of falling prices, some homeowners were hoping to raise them again.

Xue’s upbeat prognosis was not universally shared — other agents reported little change in the market — but high-frequency property market data over the past week showed some increase in buyer interest in the country’s biggest cities, economists said.

The precarious state of China’s property sector, which normally accounts for more than a quarter of activity in the world’s second-largest economy, prompted Beijing last week to unleash its most comprehensive effort in years to rekindle demand in the debt-stricken industry.

The measures, which included relaxing requirements for mortgage downpayments and interest rates, came alongside wider steps designed to boost confidence that targeted the country’s stock market, consumer sentiment and weakening currency, the renminbi.

Taken together, the announcements represented policymakers’ firmest acknowledgment of the scale of the challenge facing China’s faltering economy. But economists said investors would wait for more evidence of a tangible impact on domestic demand before venturing back into the market.

“These are the strongest measures to date when it comes to the property market, so it really shows that Beijing is putting some muscle behind its words,” said Frederic Neumann, HSBC chief Asia economist. “It remains to be seen really how much traction they’re getting.” 


China’s economy began showing signs that a post-pandemic recovery was losing steam in the second quarter as slumping property sales compounded a fall in exports and industrial production.

Sentiment continued to weaken after the ruling Communist party’s July politburo meeting failed to muster even a modest stimulus package to boost a recovery they admitted was making only “tortuous” progress, let alone a hoped-for “bazooka”.

In August, more bad news swept markets, including missed interest payments by China’s biggest private property developer by sales, Country Garden; a huge loss at rival Evergrande, whose default in 2021 rippled across the sector; and a liquidity crisis at financial conglomerate Zhongzhi.

The government stoked further distrust among investors by suddenly scrapping the publication of youth unemployment data, which had reached record levels, while consumer prices fell. Factory activity was down for a fifth consecutive month in August.

Last week, however, the government stepped up its response. In addition to reducing minimum mortgage downpayments and allowing cuts to existing mortgage interest rates, it increased personal income tax allowances for children’s education and caring for infants and the elderly. On the stock market, policymakers sliced trading fees and took other measures.


“Reflationary policy is ramping up at a pace unseen in recent years,” Morgan Stanley economist Robin Xing said in a research note, adding that the measures were the strongest response since 2018, when China’s economy slowed amid a growing trade war with the US.

Hui Shan, chief China economist at Goldman Sachs, said a rough calculation of the government’s fiscal, monetary and property measures indicated they could boost gross domestic product growth by about 60 basis points.

“Even without a ‘bazooka’, if you do enough of these kinds of piecemeal easing measures, there’s still a chance you will stabilise the economy and have an impact on growth,” said Shan.

But she cautioned: “Investors are not completely convinced yet; people are looking at property transaction data to see if it really translates into stronger sales and activity.”

Much will depend on buyers’ price expectations, analysts said. With speculative activity subdued by the downturn and market oversupply, as well as China’s already high home ownership rates and weak demographic outlook, most demand will come from upgrades or further urbanisation.

“Price expectation is one area that is perhaps holding back buyers,” said Shan.


Faster urbanisation will depend on further reform of hukou, China’s tightly controlled household registration system that entitles certain urban residents rights to city services. While some cities are relaxing hukou, the process is complicated and highly political.

Neumann raised the possibility of future mortgage rate cuts and purchase incentives such as tax cuts for buyers, adding that authorities would fine-tune the measures. “If they don’t get traction, you do more,” he said.

“A lot of this is about signalling to potential buyers that actually, the government will do whatever it can to stabilise housing prices.”

Property stocks rose this week after Country Garden avoided a technical default by meeting interest payments on its dollar bonds.

Recommended

Robin Harding
China’s demand dilemma could spell trouble for the world

But even if the property market stabilises and cyclical growth returns, the government will need to undertake a host of reforms to replace the growth engine provided by real estate and put the economy on a more sustainable track, said Xing.

Global banks have cut economic growth expectations for 2023 below the official government target of 5 per cent, itself the lowest mark in decades.

Reforms are badly needed in politically tricky areas such as social welfare spending, which needs to be increased to encourage consumption, and restructuring debt-laden local governments and their finance vehicles.

In the meantime, the property market in cities such as Beijing remains depressed. In an outlying district of the capital, Ye put his parents’ home on the market in April. But five months and one price cut later, it remains unsold.

“If it doesn’t sell, that’s it, I’m not cutting the price anymore,” he said.

FT : When Softbank is selling, why are you buying?

When Softbank is selling, why are you buying?
Can’t spell ripoff without IPO

There are many reasons not to buy Arm Holdings. Here are a few:

  • It’s not Nvidia. 

  • From some angles its IPO looks nearly as expensive as Nvidia. 

  • It’s not à la mode. Technology investment goes in fashions and Arm’s strengths — efficiency, portability, interoperability — are considered unattractive now that power is limitless, antitrust lawyers are extinct and no one goes outside. 

  • Cornerstone investors like Apple, Google, Nvidia, Samsung, Intel and TSMC appear to want blocking stakes that can prevent any eventual takeover by other cornerstone investors. Protecting Arm’s industry neutrality means, post float, the shareholder base may come to resemble a Mexican standoff. 

  • Arm’s previous owners were commonly British fund managers who don’t wait for an invitation to gripe about how the company lost its soul with the retirement of Robin Saxby, or Warren East, or Jamie Urquhart, or Sophie Wilson. Buying Arm in 2023 means an investor will be obliged to listen to them. 

Another reason worth considering is the identity of the seller, because Softbank doesn’t have a great record with floats. Only four IPOs of Softbank-backed companies still trading are higher than their issue price, with 21 underwater, FT Alphaville’s analysis shows. The average loss from IPO across the portfolio is 46 per cent.

Below is a chart of equity fundraisings where Softbank has or had a significant interest, a version of which has been circulating among buy-siders in recent days. We recreated the table using Bloomberg data and our own research. Hover over each bar for more detailed information:

On a simplified view, the IPOs of Softbank-backed companies have raised the equivalent of $75.4bn in total. The present value of the shares sold is $68.7bn, or 9 per cent less.

Overall performance is helped by Alibaba’s landmark 2014 flotation on the New York Stock Exchange. Exclude it and the total sum falls to $50.4bn raised, with the present value down nearly 33 per cent at $33.9bn.

When follow-on offerings are included the total raise grows to $81.7bn against a current value of $72.6bn. Note however that the dataset includes both primary and secondary share sales, and that these transactions don’t necessarily involve Softbank, so it’s a bit of a misleading measure.

Try to make sense of it yourself with this bar chart . . . 
. . . and this bubble chart, where the size of the bubble indicates the size of the raise:
(The Alibaba Bangkok IPO in 2022 relates to depository receipts. We cite it here because it’s in the Bloomberg data, even though it looks odd.)

Another thing to do is show whether additional offerings were above or below the IPO price. There have been slightly more sales at a premium than a discount, per the chart below, though that’s thanks largely to Nasdaq-listed oncology group Guardant Health:

Will Arm break the general trend of value destruction? Probably not. Its float is already on the back foot.

Having taken the chip designer private in 2016 for $32bn, Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son had been angling to double his money. The group last month awarded Arm a $64bn valuation by buying a 25 per cent stake from its own Vision Fund unit.

The plan now is to sell 9.4 per cent of Arm at a market capitalisation of between $48bn and $52bn. Bookrunners on the deal are tasked with raising just $4.9bn, or possibly less, which for Softbank puts the initial placing in the same value range as Coupang (down 47 per cent since IPO) and Didi Global (down 75 per cent) — albeit with a humongous overhang of stock still to sell.

And as the above charts show, investors in Softbank-backed companies have rarely lost out by waiting for their follow-on offerings rather than buying at the IPO. An even-more-reliable strategy has been to avoid them completely.

So, to each of Arm’s 28 bookrunners, good luck.

>>> US After Hours Summary: SPWH -21.1%, VRNT -13.6%, YEXT -13%

After Hours Summary: SPWH -21.1%, VRNT -13.6%, YEXT -13.5%, CHPT -10.8%, BB -8.3%, AI -6.6% lower on earnings or guidance; CVGW +10.8%, GME +5.8% higher on earnings

After Hours Gainers:

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: CVGW +10.8%, GME +5.8% (also continues to evaluate portfolio of assets), AGX +5.2%, PATH +5.1% (also authorizes new $500 mln share repurchase program), BASE +0.1%, DSGX +0.1%

Companies trading higher in after hours in reaction to news: WRK +11.1% (nearing deal to merge with Smurfit Kappa, according to WSJ), CRVS +10.5% (confirms planned initiation of CPI-818 phase 3 trial), BKCC +4.8% (BKCC and TCPC to merge into subsidiary of TCPC), TCPC +3% (BKCC and TCPC to merge into subsidiary of TCPC), IP +2% (CEO to step down), TRIN +1.3% (names new CEO), BSX +1.2% (FDA approves WATCHMAN FLX pro left atrial appendage closure device), AAOI +1.2% (CEO bought 5964 shares), SMTC +0.4% (to delay 10-Q filing), ZIM +0.1% (announces new operational cooperation agreement with MSC)

After Hours Losers:

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to earnings/guidance: SPWH -21.1%, VRNT -13.6%, YEXT -13.5%, CHPT -10.8%, PHR -9.9%, CURV -9.1%, BB -8.3% (guides AugQ revs below consensus), AI -6.6%, INTA -4.2%, CTLP -3.7%, AEO -1.9%, CXM -1.6%, PLAY -0.4% (also increases share buyback authorization by $100 mln)

Companies trading lower in after hours in reaction to news: LZ -9.4% (stock offering by selling shareholder), AMKR -8.3% (announces 10 mln share offering by Kim Family), CRGY -7.5% (to acquire incremental working interest in Western Eagle assets for $250 mln; also announces stock offering), BROS -5.7% (files mixed shelf securities offering; also files $300 mln stock offering), ROL -5.5% ($1.35 bln stock offering by selling shareholder), AEIS -4.5% (announces proposed offering of $500 mln convertible notes), NTRA -3.5% (files for $250 mln common stock offering), ALGN -2.5% (to acquire privately held direct 3d printing pioneer Cubicure for €79 mln; also introduces new vivera retainer), RDW -2.3% (files $400 mln mixed shelf securities offering), AMRX -1.9% (FDA approves Calcium Gluconate Injection), CNTY -1.5% (completes sale-leaseback of four properties), DD -1.3% (completes $3.25 bln accelerated share repurchase transaction; launches new $2 bln accelerated share repurchase transaction), VSH -1.2% (files for $600 mln convertible note offering), ALHC -0.7% (former CMO returns), ODFL -0.5% (reports LTL operating metrics for August), MAA -0.1% (CFO to retire; names new CFO), CBOE -0.1% (reports August monthly trading volume), TRNO -0.1% (enters into distribution agreements for $500 mln stock offering)

>>> US Closing Stock Market Summary

Closing Stock Market Summary

Today's trade started on a mixed note. There wasn't much conviction on either side of the tape early on, leading the major indices to trade near yesterday's closing levels. Stocks settled into a broad retreat, though, after market rates bounced in response to the ISM Services PMI at 10:00 a.m. ET.

The ISM Services PMI jumped to 54.5% from 52.7% and the Prices Index rose to 58.9% from 56.8%. That is a combination that will support the Fed's thinking that rates need to stay higher for longer. The 2-yr note yield, which is most sensitive to changes in the fed funds rate, sat at 4.95% before the data, but settled up eight basis points from yesterday at 5.04%. The 10-yr note yield, at 4.25% before the data, settled at 4.29%.

Another jump in oil prices ($87.57/bbl, +1.02, +1.2%) contributed to the negative bias today. That move, along with elevated gas prices, has stirred concerns about a slowdown in discretionary spending. On a related note, several airlines sounded a cautious note today about rising jet fuel costs.

The major indices were able to climb off their worst levels in the afternoon trade, but still registered decent losses. The S&P 500 for its part closed below its 50-day moving average (4,475). A big loss in Apple (AAPL 182.91, -6.79, -3.6%) following a few negative headlines weighed heavily on the broader market. China banned government officials from using Apple devices, according to The Wall Street Journal, and the EU Commission designated Apple as one of six "gatekeepers," which will place it under a regulatory microscope.

The Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) fell 1.2% while the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) logged a 0.3% decline. Other growth stocks were noticeably weak, too, pressured by the jump in market rates. The Russell 3000 Growth Index fell 0.9% versus a 0.3% loss in the Russell 3000 Value Index.

Nine of the 11 S&P 500 sectors closed with a loss. The information technology sector (-1.4%) saw the largest decline by a decent margin, weighed down by Apple. The utilities (+0.2%) and energy (+0.1%) sectors closed at the top of the leaderboard.

Volume remained on the light side as decliners topped advancers by a roughly 9-to-5 margin at the NYSE and a nearly 2-to-1 margin at the Nasdaq.

Nasdaq Composite: +32.5% YTD
S&P 500: +16.3% YTD
S&P Midcap 400: +7.0% YTD
Russell 2000: +6.4% YTD
Dow Jones Industrial Average: +3.9% YTD
Reviewing today's economic data:

Weekly MBA Mortgage Applications Index -2.9%; Prior 2.3%
July Trade Balance -$65.0 bln ( consensus -$68.0 bln); Prior was revised to -$63.7 bln from -$65.5 bln
The key takeaway from the report is that there was a pickup in both exports and imports that was not suggestive of any material economic weakness on a global scale, yet there are clear signs of slowing with exports down 3.5% year-over-year and imports down 4.7% year-over-year.
August S&P Global US Services PMI - Final 50.5; Prior 51.0
August ISM Non-Manufacturing Index 54.5% (consensus 52.4%); Prior 52.7%
The key takeaway from the report is twofold: services sector activity accelerated in August but prices also increased at a faster pace. The latter will be a concerning development presumably for the Fed and the Treasury market, which will be contemplating the notion of rates needing to stay higher for longer.
Thursday's economic calendar features:

8:30 ET: Weekly Initial Claims (consensus 233,000; prior 228,000), Continuing Claims (prior 1.725 mln), revised Q2 Productivity (consensus 3.7%; prior 3.7%), and revised Q2 Unit Labor Costs (consensus 1.6%; prior 1.6%)
10:30 ET: Weekly natural gas inventories (prior +32 bcf)
11:00 ET: Weekly crude oil inventories (prior -10.58 mln)

FT : Telefónica/STC: Spanish deal spreads risks and builds soft power

Telefónica/STC: Spanish deal spreads risks and builds soft power
Saudi telecoms group follows in footsteps of Gulf rivals as it seeks to spread its wings internationally

Spain’s culture is richly rooted in the period when it had Muslim rulers. Saudi Arabian telecoms group STC has just added a modern link. It has bought a 9.9 per cent exposure in Spanish counterpart Telefónica worth €2.1bn.

An ambivalent Spanish reaction has little to do with heroic myths surrounding the Christian reconquista. Instead, it reflects the purchase of a meaningful stake in a national asset by a business controlled by an authoritarian foreign government.

Acting economy minister Nadia Calviño said Spain was reviewing the purchase to check strategic interests would not be compromised. Telefónica does business with defence groups in Spain.

Foreign investment laws mean any increase in voting rights above 4.9 per cent would trigger a national security review. Spanish eyebrows will arch at the fact that STC’s precise cash equities stake is 4.9 per cent, with the balance held via derivatives.

STC says it has no intention of taking control of Telefónica. Its aim is to spread its wings internationally. Saudi Arabia is diversifying its risks out of oil and gas.

The two sides already know each other. They announced a strategic partnership in February in areas such as the internet of things.

Telefónica churns out money. Free cash flows should average €3.6bn annually through to 2025. They easily cover dividends and share buybacks. Telefonica’s net debt-to-ebitda leverage ratio (including leases) should peak this year at about 2.5 times, according to S&P CIQ.

STC spent €1.2bn on tower infrastructure in eastern Europe in April. Telefónica would add to these not only in Spain but in Brazil, Germany and the UK. However, 79 per cent of the group’s value comes from Spain and Brazil, points out James Ratzer at New Street Research.

STC is following in the footsteps of rival e&. Last month, the United Arab Emirates business announced it wanted to increase its stake in UK group Vodafone to 20 per cent. It may influence a restructuring of the telecoms company.

STC will lack that pivotal role at Telefónica, which is a more stable business. And it is debatable whether Spain would allow Saudi Arabia to take a one-fifth stake.

There is an element of soft power in even a smaller, passive stake. But Spain has seen other Gulf investors come and go, notably Kuwait in the nineties. It can afford to remain sanguine.

FT : WeWork tells landlords it will renegotiate most office leases

WeWork tells landlords it will renegotiate most office leases
Company calls rental costs ‘dramatically out of step with current market conditions’

WeWork is seeking to renegotiate nearly all of its leases around the world, weeks after the SoftBank-backed office space group warned that there was “substantial doubt” about its ability to continue as a going concern. 

The New York-based company’s drive to cut lease costs it described as “dramatically out of step with current market conditions” threatens a commercial real estate industry that is already suffering from the excess capacity that followed a coronavirus pandemic-driven surge in working from home.

As of June, WeWork was in 777 locations in 39 countries, with long-term lease obligations of more than $13bn, most of which come due in or after 2028. 

WeWork announced the plan after telling its landlords they were “strongly advised” to join a listen-only call on Wednesday morning New York time at which it would share an important business update.

David Tolley, chief executive, told landlords that dialled in that WeWork expected to exit some “unfit and underperforming locations” but would remain in most of its buildings.

In a statement after the call, he said WeWork was “taking immediate action to permanently fix our inflexible and high-cost lease portfolio” that he described as a legacy of a “period of unsustainable hypergrowth”.

WeWork has already spent several years seeking to cut its long-term lease liabilities, which exceeded $18bn at the time Adam Neumann stepped down as chief executive after a failed initial attempt at going public in 2019.

At the same time, landlords have been looking to reduce their exposure to a company that has an outsized share of the office market in cities from New York to London and has appointed a series of bankruptcy experts in recent weeks.

“We’ve been approached by about 70 landlords since 2020 and have ended up taking over eight or nine [WeWork spaces]. The approaches are accelerating right now,” said Jamie Hodari, the chief executive of Industrious, another flexible office space company.

Hodari said his company had also been “inundated” with calls from WeWork customers since its going concern warning in August.

Real estate executives have said that many of WeWork’s New York sites are in lower-quality buildings, so its troubles may contribute to a widening divide between the most modern properties and more dated ones.

As recently as the first quarter of this year, WeWork accounted for almost a quarter of new leasing activity in New York, but several industry members have sought to play down the impact of a potential bankruptcy.

“It’s a small part of the market,” one said. The company occupies about 6.4mn sq ft in a Manhattan office market that is 414mn sq ft.

Even so, some landlords have moved to protect themselves. Last year, for example, the Spanish bank Santander took 160,000 sq ft of space at 437 Madison Ave that had previously belonged to WeWork. The rent was a bit lower, according to a person familiar with the transaction, but it let the building’s owner, Sage Realty, reduce its exposure to the co-working company. 

Shares in WeWork, which ultimately gained a public listing through a merger with a blank-cheque company in 2021, have fallen by 98 per cent in the past year. Having once commanded a private market valuation of $47bn, its equity is now valued below $200mn. WeWork’s shares were 3 per cent lower at midday on Wednesday.

The lease renegotiations would have “no impact” on WeWork’s day-to-day operations, Tolley said. “Let me finish by making one thing clear,” his statement said. “WeWork is here to stay.”