U.S. Steel, United Steelworkers Square Off on Takeover
USW is backing Cleveland-Cliffs’ attempt to buy the company, but the steelmaker is considering multiple offers
United States Steel X -0.03%decrease; red down pointing triangle and the United Steelworkers union are at odds over the union’s influence as the steelmaker considers acquisition bids.
The union, which represents about 11,000 hourly production workers at U.S. Steel, is backing rival steelmaker Cleveland-Cliffs CLF -1.27%decrease; red down pointing triangle’ attempt to buy the company. U.S. Steel is pushing back, saying its contract with USW doesn’t give the union a veto vote over any potential deal for the 122-year-old company.
Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel said on Aug. 13 that the company is considering multiple offers for all or part of its business. Alongside Cleveland-Cliffs, industrial conglomerate Esmark has also announced a bid for U.S. Steel, which is one of the four big steelmakers that supply the auto industry, the construction sector and other manufacturers.
U.S. Steel for decades has been one of the nation’s largest steelmakers, operating mills and iron-ore mines. While newer competitors can produce steel more cheaply by melting scrap in electric arc furnaces, U.S. Steel’s iron-ore based production methods remain vital for steel used in auto bodies, food cans, appliances and other manufacturing.
The company’s iron-ore reserves have increasing strategic value in the industry as scrap steel supplies tighten. U.S. Steel also produces pipe for oil and gas wells, and plans to start producing specialized steel for electric-vehicle motors.
A sale of U.S. Steel could put the USW in a precarious position. U.S. Steel and Cleveland-Cliffs are the largest unionized steelmakers in the U.S. Newer steel companies, including Nucor and Steel Dynamics, operate without union-represented workers. U.S. Steel’s newest steel mill, Big River Steel in Arkansas, also has a nonunion workforce.
U.S. Steel executives plan to expand Big River’s capacity, potentially diminishing the company’s need to continue operating some older mills that rely on unionized workers. U.S. Steel since 2020 shut down most of its unionized mill near Detroit and is attempting to sell its union-staffed steel mill near St. Louis.
The union said its contract with U.S. Steel affords it “de facto veto power” over the sale of the company, because a buyer would have to negotiate a new contract with the USW before a sale is concluded.
“The potential sale of the whole company or USW-represented assets could not be consummated without the support of the USW,” the union said on Friday.
U.S. Steel said in a letter to employees Tuesday that the contract “does not grant the USW, or any party it assigns its right to, the right to prevent a potential transaction—with any party—that our board decides is in the best interest of stockholders.”
The company said the union cannot block a sale if a buyer agrees to abide by the terms of the existing contract, which is less than a year old. Any potential acquirer would need to assume the existing contract with the union, U.S. Steel said, and recognize the steelworkers union as the representative of the company’s hourly employees.
The union’s leverage over the sale process would come into play if a buyer wanted to reduce pay or other benefits as a condition for purchasing all or parts of the company, U.S. Steel said. The union could refuse to modify the contract, effectively stalling a sale.
A letter from USW President Thomas Conway to U.S. Steel dated Aug. 3 said the union “unequivocally” endorsed Cleveland-Cliffs’ plan to acquire U.S. Steel, and that the union “will not endorse anyone other than Cliffs.” Cleveland-Cliffs released the letter on Aug. 13 when it disclosed that it had submitted an unsolicited cash-and-stock offer in late July worth about $35 a share.
“Cliffs is the only realistic buyer able to acquire the totality of the U.S. Steel,” the union said.
The union said its support for Cleveland-Cliffs is based on the company’s actions since 2020, when it bought unionized mills operated by AK Steel and ArcelorMittal. The union said Cleveland-Cliffs expanded the union workforce after the acquisitions.
Cleveland-Cliffs also quickly wrapped up negotiations with United Steelworkers last year on a new contract for about 14,000 workers that included raises of 20% over four years.
U.S. Steel eventually agreed to the same wage increase. Cleveland-Cliffs has already agreed to honor the current contract between the USW and U.S. Steel if it acquires the company, the union said.
Conway said Cleveland-Cliffs’ acquisition of U.S. Steel would keep the company from being bought by a foreign-owned company.
“The USW isn’t interested in seeing these important assets falling into foreign steelmakers’ hands, and we advised both U.S. Steel and Cliffs of that position,” Conway said on Monday.
U.S. Steel said the union has the right under its contract to submit an offer to acquire the company. The union said it transferred that right to Cleveland-Cliffs, attaching the union to Cleveland Cliffs’ efforts to purchase U.S. Steel.
U.S. Steel said its board voted down Cleveland-Cliffs’ cash-and-stock proposal, calling it unreasonable after Cleveland-Cliffs refused to sign a nondisclosure agreement covering information about U.S. Steel disclosed during formal negotiations. U.S. Steel said Cleveland-Cliffs wouldn’t sign a nondisclosure agreement unless U.S. Steel accepted the economic terms of its offer.
Industry analysts have said combining U.S. Steel and Cleveland-Cliffs would likely create market concentrations that would attract opposition from government regulators and customers of the two companies. If the companies merged, Cleveland-Cliffs would control an outsize share of the markets for automotive sheet steel, iron ore and specialized metal electric-vehicle motors.