FT : Re-merger of Boeing and Spirit AeroSystems pits quality control against val

Re-merger of Boeing and Spirit AeroSystems pits quality control against value creation
Acquisition might please regulators but would strain jet maker’s liquidity and efficiency measures

Why do entrepreneurs form new companies? Nobel Prize-winning economist Ronald Coase contemplated this question in his groundbreaking work. He concluded that assessments on transaction, monitoring and agency costs would compel managers to either produce internally or outsource to another company. Such calculations have changed in recent weeks at Boeing.

On Friday, the struggling jet maker confirmed it was considering reacquiring Spirit AeroSystems. Kansas-based Spirit manufactures jet parts and was a part of Boeing until its 2005 divestiture to private equity. Yet today, 70 per cent of revenue in its largest division comes from Boeing. The 737 Max programme is particularly crucial to Spirit. 

Both Boeing and Spirit have been at the centre of a firestorm after a door plug on a Boeing 737 Max plane blew out mid-flight in January. A reintegration might please regulators, which might in turn please Boeing investors. For Spirit, it would spell the end of a strange, two-decade journey.

Spirit depends on Boeing. Boeing also depends on Spirit. Integration between the two is understandably tight. Spirit’s chief executive told investors recently that visitors to Spirit’s plant would not be able to tell if a particular employee worked at one company or the other. Every few years, the two sides have struck a “memorandum of agreement” that governs their economic relationship. 

Spirit depends on Boeing to be at the top of its production and delivery game. This has not been the case when it comes to the 737 Max and 787 Dreamliner programmes. The most recent deal, struck last autumn, came amid a liquidity crunch. Spirit generated negative free cash flow of almost $1bn in the past two years.

Spirit’s shares, post-deal rumours, have bumped up more than $30 each. However, that level is not far from its 2007 public market debut at $26. The company’s enterprise value is now $7bn, with a net debt balance of $3bn and more than $300mn of annual interest expense.

Boeing sold off what would become Spirit to focus on plane design and final assembly, both higher margin areas that investors would value. Even after a fall in recent years, Boeing shares have far outperformed those of Spirit.

An acquisition would strain Boeing’s liquidity and efficiency measures. Yet for long-term regulatory and political reasons, component manufacturing might be most optimal when performed in-house.

TechCrunch : Anthropic claims its new models beat GPT-4

Anthropic claims its new models beat GPT-4

AI startup Anthropic, backed by hundreds of millions in venture capital (and perhaps soon hundreds of millions more), today announced the latest version of its GenAI tech, Claude. And the company claims that it rivals OpenAI’s GPT-4 in terms of performance.

Claude 3, as Anthropic’s new GenAI is called, is a family of models — Claude 3 Haiku, Claude 3 Sonnet, and Claude 3 Opus, Opus being the most powerful. All show “increased capabilities” in analysis and forecasting, Anthropic claims, as well as enhanced performance on specific benchmarks versus models like GPT-4 (but not GPT-4 Turbo) and Google’s Gemini 1.0 Ultra (but not Gemini 1.5 Pro).

Notably, Claude 3 is Anthropic’s first multimodal GenAI, meaning that it can analyze text as well as images — similar to some flavors of GPT-4 and Gemini. Claude 3 can process photos, charts, graphs and technical diagrams, drawing from PDFs, slideshows and other document types.

In a step one better than some GenAI rivals, Claude 3 can analyze multiple images in a single request (up to a maximum of 20). This allows it to compare and contrast images, notes Anthropic.

But there’s limits to Claude 3’s image processing.

Anthropic has disabled the models from identifying people — no doubt wary of the ethical and legal implications. And the company admits that Claude 3 is prone to making mistakes with “low-quality” images (under 200 pixels) and struggles with tasks involving spatial reasoning (e.g. reading an analog clock face) and object counting (Claude 3 can’t give exact counts of objects in images).

Claude 3 also won’t generate artwork. The models are strictly image-analyzing — at least for now.

Whether fielding text or images, Anthropic says that customers can generally expect Claude 3 to better follow multi-step instructions, produce structured output in formats like JSON and converse in languages other than English compared to its predecessors,. Claude 3 should also refuse to answer questions less often thanks to a “more nuanced understanding of requests,” Anthropic says. And soon, the models will cite the source of their answers to questions so users can verify them.

“Claude 3 tends to generate more expressive and engaging responses,” Anthropic writes in a support article. “[It’s] easier to prompt and steer compared to our legacy models. Users should find that they can achieve the desired results with shorter and more concise prompts.”

Some of those improvements stem from Claude 3’s expanded context.

A model’s context, or context window, refers to input data (e.g. text) that the model considers before generating output. Models with small context windows tend to “forget” the content of even very recent conversations, leading them to veer off topic — often in problematic ways. As an added upside, large-context models can better grasp the narrative flow of data they take in and generate more contextually rich responses (hypothetically, at least).

Anthropic says that Claude 3 will initially support a 200,000-token context window, equivalent to about 150,000 words, with select customers getting up a 1-milion-token context window (~700,000 words). That’s on par with Google’s newest GenAI model, the above-mentioned Gemini 1.5 Pro, which also offers up to a million-token context window.

Now, just because Claude 3 is an upgrade over what came before it doesn’t mean it’s perfect.

In a technical whitepaper, Anthropic admits that Claude 3 isn’t immune from the issues plaguing other GenAI models, namely bias and hallucinations (i.e. making stuff up). Unlike some GenAI models, Claude 3 can’t search the web; the models can only answer questions using data from before August 2023. And while Claude is multilingual, it’s not as fluent in certain “low-resource” languages versus English.

But Anthropic’s promising frequent updates to Claude 3 in the months to come.

“We don’t believe that model intelligence is anywhere near its limits, and we plan to release [enhancements] to the Claude 3 model family over the next few months,” the company writes in a blog post.

Opus and Sonnet are available now on the web and via Anthropic’s dev console and API, Amazon’s Bedrock platform and Google’s Vertex AI. Haiku will follow later this year.

Here’s the pricing breakdown:

  • Opus: $15 per million input tokens, $75 per million output tokens
  • Sonnet: $3 per million input tokens, $15 per million output tokens
  • Haiku: $0.25 per million input tokens, $1.25 per million output tokens
  • So that’s Claude 3. But what’s the 30,000-foot view of all this?

Well, as we’ve reported previously, Anthropic’s ambition is to create a next-gen algorithm for “AI self-teaching.” Such an algorithm could be used to build virtual assistants that can answer emails, perform research and generate art, books and more — some of which we’ve already gotten a taste of with the likes of GPT-4 and other large language models.

Anthropic hints at this in the aforementioned blog post, saying that it plans to add features to Claude 3 that enhance its out-of-the-gate capabilities by allowing Claude to interact with other systems, code “interactively” and deliver “advanced agentic capabilities.”

That last bit calls to mind OpenAI’s reported ambitions to build a software agent to automate complex tasks, like transferring data from a document to a spreadsheet or automatically filling out expense reports and entering them in accounting software. OpenAI already offers an API that allows developers to build “agent-like experiences” into their apps, and Anthropic, it seems, is intent on delivering functionality that’s comparable.

Could we see an image generator from Anthropic next? It’d surprise me, frankly. Image generators are the subject of much controversy these days, mainly for copyright- and bias-related reasons. Google was recently forced to disable its image generator after it injected diversity into pictures with a farcical disregard for historical context. And a number of image generator vendors are in legal battles with artists who accuse them of profiting off of their work by training GenAI on that work without providing compensation or even credit.

I’m curious to see the evolution of Anthropic’s technique for training GenAI, “constitutional AI,” which the company claims makes the behavior of its GenAI easier to understand, more predictable and simpler to adjust as needed. Constitutional AI aims to provide a way to align AI with human intentions, having models respond to questions and perform tasks using a simple set of guiding principles. For example, for Claude 3, Anthropic said that it added a principle — informed by crowdsourced feedback — that instructs the models to be understanding of and accessible to people with disabilities.

Whatever Anthropic’s endgame, it’s in it for the long haul. According to a pitch deck leaked in May of last year, the company aims to raise as much as $5 billion over the next 12 months or so — which might just be the baseline it needs to remain competitive with OpenAI. (Training models isn’t cheap, after all.) It’s well on its way, with $2 billion and $4 billion in committed capital and pledges from Google and Amazon, respectively, and well over a billion combined from other backers.

WSJ : Russia’s Backdoor for Battlefield Goods From China: Central Asia

Russia’s Backdoor for Battlefield Goods From China: Central Asia
Trade routes through the region are increasingly important to Moscow’s efforts to thwart Western sanctions

SINGAPORE—Two years after the invasion of Ukraine, drones and U.S.-made computer chips are increasingly flowing to Russia from China through Central Asian trade routes, showing the difficulty of strangling supplies to Moscow’s war effort.

Trade routes snaking through former Soviet republics Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan are among the many paths into Russia for so-called dual-use goods—singled out by the U.S. and its allies because they can be used on the battlefield.

Despite their efforts, Central Asia is a growing pipeline for Russia, made possible by thousands of miles of open borders, opaque trade practices and opportunistic middlemen. The goods often originate in China, where they are manufactured in some cases by major U.S. companies, which say the items are being imported by Russia without their permission.

“The Central Asian trade route is especially important because it feeds a high concentration of Western-produced goods into Russia. It is a key route for microelectronics, car parts, luxury goods—items both used on the battlefield in Ukraine and for personal consumption,” said Natalie Simpson, a Russia analyst at C4ADS, a Washington-based nonprofit research firm that specializes in national security.

The U.S. and its allies maintain a list of dual-use goods targeted by sanctions, including computer chips, routers and ball bearings used in tanks. There were 45 items on the list last year, with another five added in February.

Chinese exports of dual-use goods to Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan have surged since February 2022, when the war began, according to China’s customs data. Exports of the 45 targeted goods rose to $1.3 billion in 2023, up 64% over 2022 levels. Many of these goods were then sent to Russia, according to trade records shared by C4ADS.


The two Central Asian nations aren’t the only source of dual-use goods to Russia. Goods are also flowing through countries such as the United Arab Emirates and Turkey. China, the largest source, exported $4.5 billion of such goods directly to Russia last year.

“Chinese companies shipping their own products can take the direct route across the border, but those who are transshipping Western goods often look for an extra degree of obfuscation,” said Simpson. “They can find this in Central Asia.”

Drones, which aren’t on the list of sanctioned goods, have become an essential tool of war. In the two years before the war, China didn’t report exporting a single drone to Kazakhstan.

But in 2023, Kazakhstan bought $5.9 million worth of unmanned aircraft from China and exported $2.7 million worth of such products to Russia, according to Kazakhstan and Chinese trade data. Kazakhstan isn’t a major producer of drones.

Diverted trade originating from China and traveling through Central Asia has only risen in importance as U.S. and European Union regulators have clamped down on their own chip exports. In 2022, the first year of the war, millions of dollars worth of U.S. and EU chips exports ended up in Russia via Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Armenia. But in 2023, U.S. and EU chip exports to those countries fell by 28% to about $22 million.

U.S. and European officials have pressed these nations and China to clamp down on gray-market trade with Russia.

Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan didn’t reply to requests for comment. China’s Foreign Ministry said that Russia was an important trading partner and that it had nothing to hide. “China always handles export of military items in a prudent and responsible manner, and has followed relevant laws and regulations when it comes to the export controls of dual-use items,” it said.

China is already the largest official source of Moscow’s imports, with bilateral trade roughly doubling to $200 billion in 2023 over the past five years, according to Chinese trade data. China sells computer chips, jet-fighter parts and jamming technology to Russian defense companies, The Wall Street Journal has reported. China has said it doesn’t send lethal weapons to parties involved in conflicts, and the U.S. hasn’t accused it of doing so.

Still, shipments of battlefield items, even if nonlethal, threaten to become a sticking point between U.S., Chinese and European leaders. U.S. trade officials have raised concerns with Beijing about Chinese companies violating export controls by transshipping U.S. items to Russia.

Russia managed to import $8.8 billion worth of dual-use goods from around the world in the first 10 months of 2023, just 10% lower than in the pre-sanctions period, according to a January report by the Kyiv School of Economics.

Russia stopped publishing detailed trade data after the invasion and resumed releasing some data a year later. Using commercially available Russian customs records, C4ADS said it was able to track about $64 million of goods exported to Russia from Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan during the first seven months of 2023, although it cautioned the data set it was working with may not reflect the full extent of the transactions.

Many of the goods that are originating in China are made by U.S. companies, according to a review of customs databases. For example, seven shipments of “computing machine devices” that are considered dual-use goods were made in June 2023 from a Chinese subsidiary of International Business Machines to a trader in the Kyrgyz capital of Bishkek. Those shipments, worth $3,700, ended up at OOO BSO, a Russian business on a Treasury Department blacklist.

IBM said it doesn’t do business with those companies and is conducting an internal review. “Any diversion of IBM products to Russia is happening in direct violation of our company’s policies and internal controls,” an IBM spokeswoman said.

In another instance around the same time, a shipment of transistors left the Chinese factory of Vishay Intertechnology, an electronics company based in Malvern, Pa. The Vishay components were sold to a Kazakh company, which then resold them to a Russian electronics wholesaler, according to customs data.

A database run by Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry shows transistors made by Vishay turning up in Russian reconnaissance drones and satellite communication stations on the battlefront. Vishay didn’t respond to requests for comment.

The Kazakh company involved in the transaction, Elem Group, was added to the U.S. Commerce Department’s trade blacklist in December for its potential role in the diversion of export-controlled items. Elem Group exported at least $1.15 million worth of products to Russia between March and August 2023, according to U.S.-based trade-data aggregator ImportGenius.

They included electronic items produced by U.S. companies, including Texas Instruments, based in Dallas, and Analog Devices, based in Wilmington, Mass. China was the largest supplier to Elem Group in the same period, the data shows, providing about 35% of its imports.

Analog Devices said that it has ceased business activities in Russia and Russian-backed regions of Ukraine in compliance with U.S. sanctions. “Any post-sanctions shipment into these regions is a direct violation of our policy and the result of an unauthorized resale or diversion of ADI products,” it said.

A Texas Instruments spokesperson said that the company stopped selling products to buyers in Russia in February 2022 and that any shipments of its chips into Russia were illicit and unauthorized. TI said it strongly opposed the use of its chips in Russian military equipment and the illicit diversion of its products to Russia.

Elem Group, which was founded less than a month after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine by a Russian businessman, had fewer than five employees and made an estimated $14.5 million in revenues in 2022, according to corporate database Statsnet. In March 2023, ownership was transferred to a Kazakh national. Elem Group didn’t respond to requests for comment.

WWD : Douglas Group Plans IPO

Douglas Group Plans IPO
The German beauty retailer could go public as early as this month and targets an equity contribution of around 1.1 billion euros from the transaction.

IPOs are heating up in the European beauty market, with Puig and reportedly Galderma mulling public offers

“The proceeds are expected to be used to continue deleveraging the Douglas Group’s balance sheet,” the company said.

At the end of the first quarter, the group’s net financial debt was 3.06 billion euros.

“The remaining debt position is expected to be refinanced at better terms in connection with the IPO,” the company continued. “The IPO would accelerate the debt reduction and decrease the interest expenses of the company, thus enlarging the financial flexibility of the Douglas Group and its further value creation.”

Following the IPO, CVC Capital Partners will maintain an indirect majority interest in Douglas Group, and the Kreke family is to remain an indirect shareholder in it. Neither will sell any shares at the IPO.

“With our strong performing omnichannel business model we cater to customers in our stores and e-com business and have successfully set the course for long-term future growth with our strategy ‘Let it Bloom – Douglas 2026,’” said Sander van der Laan, chief executive officer of Douglas Group, in the statement. “Our IPO is the logical next step for us to leverage our full potential in the future as a publicly listed company.

“Driven by our highly motivated team, Douglas Group is ideally positioned to further capitalize on the large, resilient and growing European premium beauty market, where our customers are attracted by our comprehensive beauty offering and value our broad and distinctive range of brands,” he continued, referring to a market that is expected to increase by around 5.4 percent at a compound annual growth rate, or CAGR, to 24.2 billion euros by 2028.


“We are very proud of the development of Douglas Group in recent years – the group has successfully transformed into the number-one omnichannel premium beauty destination in Europe,” added Henning Kreke, chairman of the supervisory board of Douglas Group, speaking of the retailer’s five largest European countries: Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland, according to OC&C analysis.

“Our family sees itself as a passionate and committed shareholder, and looks forward to continuing to accompany the Douglas Group on its journey in the future,” he said.

The company said it is on track to reach its mid-term target to grow group net sales at a CAGR of around 7 percent and achieve an adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization margin of around 18.5 percent.


In the company’s first-quarter 2024, sales gained 8 percent in reported terms to 1.56 billion euros, while on a like-for-like basis, they advanced 7.5 percent. Omnichannel growth was robust, with net store sales and e-commerce sales rising 6.7 and10.7 percent, respectively.

In the period, Douglas Group’s net income grew 10.6 percent to 125.2 million euros.

WSJ : Li Auto Shares Fall After Recent Run-Up, MEGA Miss

Li Auto Shares Fall After Recent Run-Up, MEGA Miss
Chinese EV maker launches first full-electric model, MEGA, at a slightly higher price than analysts expected

Li Auto’s LI -5.10%decrease; red down pointing triangle shares dropped sharply on Monday, with analysts attributing the selloff to profit-taking after big gains last week and some consumer disappointment with the Chinese electric-vehicle maker’s newest model.

Shares were 13% lower at 156.20 Hong Kong dollars (US$19.95) by midday, on track for their largest one-day percentage drop since October 2022. The loss, the biggest among Hang Seng Index constituents, trimmed year-to-date gains to 6.1%.

The decline came after Li Auto, a plug-in hybrid electric-vehicle specialist, on Friday launched its first full-electric model, MEGA, at 559,800 yuan (US$77,785), slightly higher than analysts expected.

“Investors’ feedback on the MEGA launch event are polarized in terms of pricing and interior design,” CCB International 601939 -0.43%decrease; red down pointing triangle equity analyst Ke Qu said.

Hanyang Wang, a senior analyst at 86 Research, said that order numbers over the weekend are likely to be weaker than expected.

Li Auto also said late Friday that it delivered 20,251 vehicles in February, up 22% from a year earlier but far below January numbers. Meanwhile, its Huawei-backed competitor Seres, which competes in the SUV market in the same hybrid space, outsold Li Auto for the second straight month.

Li Auto has guided for sales of 50,000 vehicles in March, and investors are waiting on MEGA’s orders to see whether the goal is in reach.

Some of the share-price drop was to be expected, analysts said, after a run-up in shares last week. On Tuesday, after Li Auto provided a solid plan for 2024 in its fourth-quarter earnings report and call, shares rose 25%, their most in nearly two years.

Until Monday’s drop, shares had gained for nine consecutive trading sessions, adding 44%.