>>> What to look at today - 2nd of April 2026

Oil jumped, while stocks and bonds fell after President Donald Trump warned the US would hit Iran “extremely hard” over the next two to three weeks, undermining expectations for an imminent resolution to the five-week-old Middle East conflict. Brent crude jumped 5% to above $106 a barrel as the war kept the Strait of Hormuz — a key artery for Middle East shipments — effectively shut, tightening supply. The passage would reopen “naturally” once hostilities subside, the US president said, without providing details or a clear timeline. Stocks sold off after Trump’s speech undermined a nascent global rally, as concerns grew that a prolonged war would keep crude oil prices elevated and weigh on economic growth. A gauge of Asian shares fell 2.1%, while equity-index futures for the US and Europe dropped more than 1.2%, signaling the two-day advance in global equities on expectations of easing tensions is unlikely to hold. The dollar strengthened, reinforcing its appeal as the haven of choice during the war. Treasuries dropped on inflation concerns and precious metals declined. Optimism had been building in the run-up to Trump’s speech after the president had earlier said he foresaw the US ending the war with Iran within two to three weeks. The change of tone in Trump’s speech damped hopes for a quick conclusion of the conflict that has already roiled financial markets and pushed several equity gauges into correction territory as investors pare risk. In the near 20-minute speech, Trump didn’t outline any shift in Iran policy, nor did he provide specifics on how operations would proceed beyond what he has said before. Trump said the core strategic objectives are nearing completion, in a speech from the White House. The president nevertheless suggested that military operations may soon escalate, saying “over the next two to three weeks, we’re going to bring them back to the stone ages where they belong.”  The rare prime-time speech came as the president was grasping for an off-ramp in a conflict that has quickly slipped out of control.  Hours ahead of the speech, the Iranian president took the unusual step of issuing a letter addressed to Americans, arguing that his country has no enmity with the US and has acted in self-defense. He warned that “continuing along the path of confrontation is more costly and futile than ever before” and noted that attacks on infrastructure directly target the Iranian people. Earlier, Trump said that Iran has asked for a ceasefire, adding that the US would only consider it if the Strait of Hormuz was reopened. Iran’s foreign ministry said the claim of a ceasefire request was “false and baseless,” according to state TV. US After Hours PENG +10.7%, FC +10.3% higher on earnings; CNTB +16.5% sharply higher on insider purchase

Nikkei -2.40% Hang Seng -1.09% CSI -0.75% Shanghai -0.53% Shenzen -1.17%

Eur$ 1.1536 CNH 6.8888 CNY 6.8869 JPY 159.35 GBP 1.3235 CHF 0.7987 RUB 80.6198 TRY 44.4990 WTI$ 105.19 +5.06% Gold 4,671 -2.43% BTC 66,332 -2.70% ETH 2,045 -4.60%

S&P -1.42% Nasdaq -1.80% EuroStoxx -1.96% FTSE -0.91% Dax -1.89% SMI -

Macro :
- Trump Speech Has Markets Bracing for More Escalation: OCBC
- Ackman’s Call to Ignore the Bears Gels With Market Signals
- Bitcoin Tumbles With Stocks as Trump Signals Harder Iran Strikes
- NASA Astronauts Reach Safe Orbit in Historic Moon Mission
- Deutsche Börse Says US Court Rules in Favor of Iran Creditors
- JPMorgan Sweetens LBO Debt Pricing Bid: Financials Wrap
- Bear-Case Oil at $120 to Spur 10-Point EPS Hit: Equity Insight

Keep an eye on :
- AC FP : Accor to Sell 30.56% Stake in Essendi for Up to €975m
- AC FP : Launch 225 millions euros share buyback part of the 450mil program
- ADDTB SS : Addtech Acquires Staka Holding BV for Undisclosed Sum
- BABA US : Alibaba Unveils Third Closed-Source AI Model in Focus on Profit
- ANTIN FP : Antin Buys Sapphire Gas Solutions From Apollo Funds
- APO US : Apollo Global 1Q Prelim Alternative Net Investment Income ~$205m
- BALSP SW : Baloise Swiss Property Fund Plans CHF150M Capital Increase
- BSS IM : Biesse Says CFO Pierre La Tour Resigned
- BA US : Boeing Wins $900 Million U.S. Air Force Contract
- CON GY : Continental Sees 1Q Tires Adj Ebit Margin Higher Y/Y
- DB1 GY : Deutsche Börse Says US Court Rules in Favor of Iran Creditors
- LLY US : Lilly’s Obesity Pill Gets US Approval in Challenge to Novo
- EL US : Estée Lauder, Puig Said to Advance Talks for Mostly Stock Deal
- Fazer IPO : CEO of Finnish Chocolate Maker Fazer Sees IPO Happening by 2029
- GILD US : Gilead Extends Tender Offer to Buy Arcellx
- GSAT US : Globalstar Shares Jump on Report of Amazon Acquisition Talks +20%
- IDR SM : Indra Names Ángel Simón Grimaldos as Non-Executive Chairman
- KER FP : Kering Sells Majority Stake in Milan Luxury Building
- MSFT US : Microsoft CFO’s AI Spending Runs Up Against Tech Bubble Fears
- AERO SW : Montana Aerospace Sees 2027 Net Sales Above EU1.1B
- MUX GY : Mutares Plans EUR105 Million Capital Increase to Fund Global Expansion
- NANO FP : Médicaments : comment les nanoparticules de Nanobiotix veulent doper les traitements du futur
- NDX1 GY : Nordex Group expands wind farm in Germany by an additional 40 MW
- NOVOB DC : Lilly’s Obesity Pill Gets US Approval in Challenge to Novo
- ORCL US : Oracle Data Center Nears $16 Billion Financing After Twisty Path
- PLTR US : NHS staff boycott Palantir’s data platform over ethical concerns
- 010140 KS : Samsung Heavy Rises 7% After BlackRock Says It Holds 5% Stake
- SHBA SS : Handelsbanken to Recognize SEK1.1BN of VAT Refund in Q1
- Space X IPO : SpaceX Is Said to File Confidentially for IPO Ahead of AI Rivals
- STLA US : Stellantis in Talks to Make Chinese EVs at Idle Canada Plant
- SPSN SW : Swiss Prime Site Fund to Launch CHF74 Million Capital Increase
- Thames Water : UK’s Ofwat Set to Waive Thames Water Fines to 2030, FT Reports
- TTE FP : TotalEnergies and Masdar to Merge Green Assets in Nine Nations
- UNO GY : Uniper Sells 27% of Offered Bierwang Gas Space Wednesday
- UNIT US : Uniti Group Jumps 15% to Highest in Two Years; Volume Surges
- VIE FP : Veolia a réalisé avec succès un nouveau placement obligataire en 2 tranches pour un total de 1 milliard d'euros
- VSAT US : ridium, ViaSat higher after report of Globalstar takeover talks
- WMG US : Warner Music Group Buys Revelator Music Platform
- WLN FP : Scarred by Wirecard, Germany Takes on a Global Payments Scandal

>>> Europe : Brokers Upgrades & Downgrades - 2nd of April 2026

>>> Up
* Aryzta Raised to Hold at Kepler Cheuvreux
* Atlas Copco Raised to Buy at Pareto Securities; PT 205 kronor
* BHP Raised to Hold at Berenberg
* BHP ADRs Raised to Hold at Berenberg; PT $65
* BP PT Raised to 700 pence from 520 pence at Berenberg
* Carel Raised to Buy at Goldman; PT 25.40 euros
* Fortum Raised to Neutral at Citi; PT 20.50 euros
* Glencore: Berenberg Raised PT to 6,30 from 6,00 GBP - buy
* Hiab Raised to Buy at SEB Equities; PT 50 euros
* Kering Raised to Neutral at Rothschild & Co Redburn
* Norsk Hydro Raised to Buy at Goldman; PT 120 kroner
* Rational Raised to Outperform at Oddo BHF; PT 790 euros
* Redeia Raised to Buy at Jefferies; PT 16.50 euros
* Repsol ADRs Rated New Buy at Berenberg; PT $35.50
* Sanoma Raised to Buy at Kepler Cheuvreux
* Technip Energies Raised to Buy at Rothschild & Co Redburn
* Tilray Brands Raised to Buy at Roth Capital Partners; PT $10

>>> Down
* Akzo Nobel Cut to Neutral at Goldman; PT 54 euros
* Amplifon Cut to Neutral at BNP Paribas; PT 10 euros
* Biogaia Cut to Hold at SEB Equities; PT 130 kronor
* CA Immo Cut to Accumulate at Erste Group; PT 26.80 euros
* Elisa Cut to Hold at SEB Equities; PT 44 euros
* Harbour Energy Cut to Hold at Peel Hunt; PT 270 pence
* Lufthansa Cut to Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 7.50 euros
* Neste Cut to Equal-Weight at Morgan Stanley; PT 27 euros
* Nike PT Cut to $57 from $80 at Williams Trading
* Sanoma Cut to Hold at SEB Equities; PT 9.90 euros

>>> Initiation
* B&M European Rated New Buy at Kepler Cheuvreux; PT 240 pence
* Cornish Metals Rated New Buy at Berenberg; PT 196 pence
* Freeport Reinstated Buy at Goldman; PT $70
* HomeToGo Rated New Buy at Baader Helvea; PT 2.50 euros
* Louis Hachette Group Rated New Outperform at BNP Paribas

>>> Call
* Airline PTs Cut, Lufthansa Downgraded at Morgan Stanley on Fuel
* Berkeley is Upgraded at RBC For Second Time in as Many Days
* Neste Downgraded at Morgan Stanley on Greater Policy Risk
* Rational Now Past Low Point of the Cycle, Oddo BHF Upgrades
* Redeia Upgraded at Jefferies on Attractive Valuation Opportunity

>>> Stoxx 600 Pre-Market Indications

  • Repsol (REP TH) +2.3%
  • Equinor (DNQ TH) +2%
  • BP (BPE5 TH) +1.7%
  • Kongsberg (KOZ1 TH) +1.1%
  • Fuchs (FPE3 TH) -3.7%
  • ASML (ASME TH) -3.8%
  • Aixtron (AIXA TH) -3.8%
  • Generali (ASG TH) -3.9%
  • TUI (TUI1 TH) -4%
  • RENK Group (R3NK TH) -4.1%
  • Alstom (AOMD TH) -4.6%
  • Eurofins Scientific (ESF0 TH) -4.7%
  • Lufthansa (LHA TH) -4.8%
    • Airline PTs Cut, Lufthansa Downgraded at Morgan Stanley on Fuel
  • Hensoldt (HAG TH) -5.4%

>>> TradeGate Pre-Market Indications

DAX:
  • Deutsche Bank (DBK TH) -2.5%
  • Rheinmetall (RHM TH) -2.9%
  • Infineon (IFX TH) -3.3%
  • Deutsche Telekom (DTE TH) -3.6%
  • Siemens Energy (ENR TH) -3.8%
MDAX:
  • K+S (SDF TH) -1%
  • Bechtle (BC8 TH) -1.1%
  • Aroundtown (AT1 TH) -4.4%
  • TKMS (TKMS TH) -4.5%
  • Lufthansa (LHA TH) -4.7%
    • Airline PTs Cut, Lufthansa Downgraded at Morgan Stanley on Fuel
  • AUTO1 (AG1 TH) -5%
  • Hensoldt (HAG TH) -5%
SDAX:
  • Kontron (KTN TH) -2.3%
  • Evotec (EVT TH) -2.4%
  • Heidelberger Druck (HDD TH) -2.8%
  • SUSS MicroTec (SMHN TH) -3.2%
  • Mutares (MUX TH) -7.8%
    • Mutares Launches €105M Capital Increase With Subscription Rights

WSJ : The Islands That Give Iran a Stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz

The Islands That Give Iran a Stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz
The dots of land both provide export terminals for Tehran’s oil and a strategic position over shipping lanes


Iran’s fortifications on small islands near the Strait of Hormuz boost its power to control the key waterway, and reopening shipping there might require U.S. or allied forces to capture some of those same dots of land.

The importance of the islands such as Kharg, Qeshm and Abu Musa is increasingly coming into view as Iran causes an economic crisis by blocking most oil tankers from transiting the strait. The waterway carried about 20% of the world’s traded crude oil before the war; traffic has slowed to a trickle since the U.S.-Israeli air war on Iran began on Feb. 28.

“Navigation through the Hormuz Strait requires you to follow a certain route,” says Yossi Kuperwasser, former head of Israeli military intelligence research and now director of think tank Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security. “This route goes between islands that are controlled by Iran.”

Tehran has called its 19 islands in the 100-mile strait aircraft carriers, installing radar systems, airstrips and fuel depots, missile systems and naval launches for submarines and fast-attack boats.

Unlocking the strait promises to be the next phase of the war, either through a negotiated peace agreement or a military operation. An amphibious assault ship, the USS Tripoli, arrived in the Middle East over the weekend ferrying elements of the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, which is specifically trained for operations such as taking control of islands in hostile territory.


Iran’s most strategically important island, Kharg, is actually hundreds of miles northwest of the strait itself. Iran loads 90% of its crude oil at Kharg, making it the beating heart of Iran’s economy.

The U.S. launched a furious aircraft-and-missile assault on Kharg focused on eliminating its military installations. But the attack didn’t touch the oil facilities, and market analysts said tankers continued to load at Kharg in the following days.

President Trump has repeatedly spoken of seizing Kharg as leverage to compel the regime to lay off Hormuz. But taking Kharg would be difficult because it is large and located deep in Iranian territory. And there is no guarantee American control of Kharg’s oil facilities would force Iran’s hand.


The largest island at the Hormuz Strait, Qeshm is critical for Iran’s control of Hormuz. Another location for oil exports, Qeshm hosts a naval station and missiles in underground tunnels. It is also the site of a large desalination plant that Tehran has accused the U.S. of bombing.

Smaller islands near Qeshm are likewise fortified with military structures, including Hormuz to the east. Kish, westward into the Gulf, has an airstrip.


Perhaps most directly tied to Hormuz transits, Larak is linked to Iran’s monitoring of vessel traffic and a key military asset for the regime.

Outwardly a barren desert island, Larak has housed a Russian-made satellite communications-jamming system guarded by Iranian naval infantry and fast-attack vessels with antiship missiles, according to Israel-based Alma Research and Education Center.

As Iran has asserted new levels of control over the strait since the war began, Larak has been used by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to monitor ship traffic, said Max Meizlish, a research fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former sanctions enforcement officer in the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. Meizlish described Larak as “the corridor’s operational backbone.”

In the past, ships transiting the strait passed closer to its southern side, nearer the coast of Oman. But as Iran exerts gatekeeping power, analysts at Lloyd’s List Intelligence say vessels are now transiting a channel between Larak and Qeshm, and hugging the Iranian coast as they head to open seas. Nearly all of the tankers that have exited Hormuz since the beginning of the war have had an Iran connection, according to Lloyd’s.


“This is not how things were moving prior to the war, and it’s a really disturbing development in terms of Iran exerting control over traffic through the Straits,” Tomer Raanan, a Lloyd’s maritime-risk analyst, told an online conference last week.

Raanan said Iran appears to be putting in place a screening system where vessel operators need to contact the IRGC, the powerful paramilitary force running the war effort, through an intermediary and provide documentation to get clearance. In a small number of cases, ships have paid to transit, with the going rate quoted at up to $2 million in Chinese yuan for a very large crude carrier, Raanan said.


Abu Musa is where Iran locked in control over the strait 55 years ago. Closer to Dubai than to the Iranian mainland, Abu Musa was a British protectorate along with seven emirates that are today the United Arab Emirates.

In 1971, the U.S.-backed Shah of Iran put troops on Abu Musa along with Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb during a period of turmoil sparked by British retreat from the region. The Emiratis sustain claims to the islands today.


A pair of tiny sun-baked islands called Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb are Iran’s eyes on the channel, and of course have boasted military fortifications. The larger of the two, Greater Tunb, is about 4 square miles, about the size of Key West.

It is here where Iran has territory closest to the shipping lanes. The strait itself is roughly 21 miles wide at its narrowest point, but ships actually track along two deep channels—one westward into the Gulf and one out—that are each only about 2 miles wide. The Tunb islands sit in between the two channels.

WSJ : U.A.E. Is Revoking Visas, Stranding Iranian Residents Abroad in a Widening

U.A.E. Is Revoking Visas, Stranding Iranian Residents Abroad in a Widening Crackdown
Ties that date back centuries are under heavy strain from Iran’s bombardments during the war

  • The U.A.E. has launched a widespread crackdown on Iranians, canceling visas and closing institutions, to protest Tehran’s daily drone and missile attacks.
  • The crackdown affects nearly half a million Iranians and includes a public ban on Iranian passport holders entering or transiting the country.
  • The U.A.E. is considering freezing Iranian assets and preparing to help open the Strait of Hormuz by force, The Wall Street Journal reported.

DUBAI—The United Arab Emirates has launched a broad crackdown on Iranians in the country, including canceling visas and closing institutions to protest Tehran’s daily drone and missile attacks.

Several Iranian families in Dubai say they have relatives who have lived in the U.A.E. for decades whose visas were suddenly revoked, sometimes while they were traveling, leaving them unable to return.

This week the U.A.E. announced a broader ban on Iranian passport holders from entering or transiting the country. Earlier, it closed the Iranian Hospital—an institution nearly as old as the state—along with an Iranian social club and several Iranian schools, making it harder for families to stay.

The moves have hit a community of nearly half a million people that long has long underpinned a mutually lucrative relationship between the two countries.

The U.A.E. is Iran’s most important link to the global economy and for years has served as a financial hub for Iranian businesses and people seeking a haven from Western sanctions, according to analysts tracking Tehran’s activities and the U.S. Treasury. Iranian cash, in turn, has helped fuel the growth of the Emirati commercial capital, Dubai.

At a decades-old Iranian restaurant in Dubai, Al Ustad Special Kebab, owner Majeed Ansari said he understands the U.A.E. government’s tightening restrictions.

“They want safety, and I understand that,” he said, as waiters bustled past with plates of yogurt-marinated mutton and chicken kebabs. He said that historical ties between Iran and Dubai run deep and won’t be easily shaken by the continuing conflict.

“They respect us, and we respect them,” said Ansari, whose father opened the eatery nearly half a century ago, in 1978, just seven years after the U.A.E. was established.

Just across the street at the Ali Bin Ali grocery store, a shopkeeper was more apprehensive as he arranged boxes of Iranian dates and nuts. He said he has family in Iran but considers Dubai home, and fears leaving in case he can’t return.

The U.A.E. and Iran have always had tensions, but they have intensified under wartime pressure. Iran began firing drones and missiles at the U.A.E. almost immediately after it came under attack by the U.S. and Israel, hitting marquee targets including Dubai’s man-made Palm island, the Burj al-Arab luxury hotel and the airport. Overall it has fired around 2,500 drones and missiles at the country, far more than it has launched at Israel.

The U.A.E. is preparing for the possibility of military involvement with Iran and may take action to reopen the Strait of Hormuz by force, which would make it the first Persian Gulf country to become a combatant, The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday. A U.A.E. official said the country’s posture remains defensive.

The U.A.E. also is considering tougher financial actions, including freezing Iranian assets in the country, the Journal has reported. Every pressure point on Iran is under consideration, a person familiar with the U.A.E.’s evolving policy toward Iranian residents said this week. Authorities will reassess residency policies for communities like Iranians in light of wartime attacks on the economy, the official said.

The U.A.E.’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said its Iranian community is a valued and integral part of its social fabric.

The Persian and Arab populations that line either side of the Strait of Hormuz have been intertwined for centuries. Parts of what is now Iran’s coastline was controlled in the 1800s by a dynasty based in the present-day U.A.E.

Iranian migration to what is now the U.A.E. came in several waves. Merchants came to Dubai in the 19th century. Pious Muslims came in the 1920s, leaving Iran as the shah secularized the nation, including banning the headscarf. Secular Iranians later came in droves to escape the Islamic Revolution in the late 1970s.

Some early Iranian migrants became Emirati citizens during the foundation of the U.A.E. in the early 1970s. More than half of all Emiratis trace their ancestral roots to southern Iran, said Mira Al Hussein, an associate fellow at the University of Edinburgh’s Alwaleed bin Talal Centre.

Other migrants didn’t qualify but continued to live as Iranian nationals in the U.A.E. Some families have resided in the U.A.E. for generations on visas that must be renewed every few years and depend on employment or property ownership.

“There are a lot of politics around the Persian origin,” said Al Hussein, who is Emirati of ancestral Persian origin. “Families who have been in the Emirates a long time ago wear it proudly. Others, especially those that came later, changed their name, worried about being assumed to have dual loyalties.”

Those tensions are now coming to a head. Many Iranians with U.A.E. residency who were abroad during the war have had their residency permits canceled, leaving students stranded at U.S. universities and travelers stuck on family visits in Iran. A notice from the Dubai-based Emirates Airline said Iranian nationals aren’t allowed to enter or transit the country.

On Wednesday, at a travel agency near Al Ustad Special Kebab that advertised “flights to Persia,” the owner said his business to and from Iran had dried up. The government had been increasingly rejecting visa applications for Iranians since the war began, he said.

The parking lot at Dubai’s Towheed Iranian Boys School sat deserted. The lettering had been stripped from the building, leaving only a faint imprint of the school’s name on the facade. Four U.A.E. flags fluttered from the roof in the afternoon breeze, while a small fleet of roughly two dozen school buses stood idle beside the compound.

Across town, entrances to the Iranian Hospital were barred, including the emergency wing. A lone security guard pacing the grounds said authorities closed the facility about a week ago. The morning after the abrupt shutdown, he said he had to turn away doctors and nurses who arrived unaware.

Calls to the hospital, the Iranian Club and the Iranian Business Council went unanswered. Calls to the Salman Farsi School and Towheed Iranian School went straight to a voicemail indicating the power had been cut off.

Saif Sabet, who moved to Dubai more than two decades ago from the Iranian city of Gerash, said he would skip a planned trip to Iran later this year given the new climate. He owns two grocery shops in Dubai and said his roots are now firmly established in the city. His bank called him recently to check in on him, he said with a smile.

“Everyone is hospitable to us here,” he said. “My family is here; my business is here; my life is here.”

One Iranian resident said he was detained by police after an officer stopped and asked for his identification as he wandered on the beach. He was released after being questioned.

Others said they fear that they would be deported if they were critical of the U.A.E., but also that the Islamic Republic could go after their families if they denounce Iran.

“The war is going to have a long-term, permanent impact,” said Mishaal Al Gergawi, an Emirati entrepreneur and writer.

“There will be skepticism around any kind of coexistence with the Iranian regime,” he said. “Iran lost a tolerant neighbor.”

WSJ : Trump Expected to Overhaul Steel, Aluminum Tariffs

Trump Expected to Overhaul Steel, Aluminum Tariffs
Altered rates on finished products made with the metals would simplify compliance, but could effectively raise costs for many imports

WASHINGTON—The Trump administration is preparing to reshape its steel and aluminum tariff regime, altering duties on finished products to help simplify compliance. The net effect of the changes could effectively raise costs for many imports.

What’s changing
Under an expected presidential proclamation, which could be issued as soon as this week, finished products made with imported steel and aluminum would be tariffed at 25%, according to people with knowledge of the plans.

The 25% tariff would apply to the entire value of a finished product—known derivative products—containing steel and aluminum, the people said. That would replace the current 50% duty, which only applies to the value of steel or aluminum used in a product.

The 50% tariff will remain in place for commodity-grade steel and aluminum products—goods that are almost entirely made of the metals, the people said. Some goods could be reclassified as commodity products if they are made almost entirely of the metals.

Kush Desai, a White House spokesman, said that the administration has “always been clear about implementing a nuanced, nimble, and multifaceted strategy to reshore critical manufacturing back to the United States,” adding that “any reporting about potential executive actions that haven’t been officially announced by the administration should, however, be considered unsubstantiated speculation.”

The impact
The consequences of the tariff changes will vary widely depending on the product. Even though the tariff rate will be lower for many goods, the change likely means the cost of the tariffs assessed on many products will be higher. That’s because of duties being charged on the full value of imported products rather than just their steel or aluminum content.

The move could also mean the U.S. government will take in more money under the steel and aluminum tariffs, which are imposed under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. That could help partially offset the lower tariff revenues that the government has collected since the Supreme Court invalidated many of Trump’s other levies in February.

The expected changes are meant to make compliance easier for companies that have struggled to measure the value of the steel and aluminum content in complex manufactured products.

“This action will help ensure these tariffs function as intended to support domestic production and American workers,” said Jon Toomey, president of the Coalition for a Prosperous America, a protectionist group that represents many domestic U.S. steel and aluminum companies and has worked with the administration on the tariff changes.

The back story
In 2018, Trump imposed a 25% tariff on imported steel and 10% tariff on imported aluminum, but only on commodity-grade metal. Manufacturers argued that those tariffs increased their metal costs—and allowed imported finished products made with steel and aluminum to enter the country without tariffs.

When Trump returned to office, he increased the aluminum tariff to 25% and expanded the metal tariffs to hundreds of imported finished goods, including screws, furniture and auto parts that were previously not subject to levies. Last June, he doubled those levies to 50%.

The expected tariff changes would come after months of deliberations inside the administration over how to rewrite steel and aluminum tariffs to simplify compliance. Earlier this year, the administration weighed a plan to create three tiers of different tariff levels, but ultimately decided on an even simpler proposal.

Re:FT : Distressed-debt funds target private credit downturn as ‘greatest opportuni



From: Laurent Chekroun (MAKOR CAPITAL MARKET) At: 03/29/26 22:07:04 UTC+2:00
To: Laurent Chekroun (MAKOR CAPITAL MARKET )
Subject: FT : Distressed-debt funds target private credit downturn as ‘greatest opportuni
Distressed-debt funds target private credit downturn as ‘greatest opportunity’ since 2008
Investors anticipate money-making bonanza as sector comes under strain

Investors who specialise in scooping up distressed assets at bargain prices have identified a downturn in private credit as their best opportunity since the 2008 financial crisis.

These funds, which typically invest in companies with bad balance sheets but viable underlying businesses, have been largely sidelined for a decade as markets surged but are now betting on making money from strains in private credit.

“Biggest opportunity since 2008,” said Victor Khosla, founder of Strategic Value Partners, which manages $21bn in assets.

Andrew Milgram, founder of Greenwich-based Marblegate Asset Management, said: “This is not about a few bad loans . . . We’re out in the market right now raising a new fund because this is the greatest opportunity I’ve ever seen in my lifetime. I couldn’t imagine God would smile on me like this.”

Private credit has become one of Wall Street’s top worries this year, as several funds, managed by the likes of Apollo Global Management, Blackstone and Ares, have faced billions of dollars in redemptions amid questions about their exposure to software companies at risk of losing out to AI.

“These outflows have reached a tipping point, whereby everybody on a rational basis has to ask for their money back,” said John Aylward, the founder of Sona Asset Management. “You have a large amount of distress, and you have forced selling, and it’s going to provide great opportunities that we’re already seeing.”

The proportion of US leveraged loans with an interest coverage ratio — a measure of ability to service debt — weaker than a level that is considered stressed has more than doubled to 20 per cent since 2019, according to recent research by credit investor Davidson Kempner.

At the same time, more borrowers are opting to defer repayments and increase their loan balance. This combination has led some investors and analysts to argue the true corporate default rate is far higher than reported.

Distressed investors bristle at being called “vulture funds” — a sobriquet that gained traction in the 1980s for hedge funds that swoop in when companies run into trouble — arguing they are far more sophisticated than the industry’s early bottom feeders. Many are no longer purely distressed investors, having diversified into buying higher-quality credit and equity.

Milgram at Marblegate said he and his team go on “regional swings” — short trips to cities such as Cincinnati and Charlotte to get a sense of the mood there. He takes local bankers out to steak dinners to learn what keeps them up at night.

For the past several months, the picture has grown increasingly grim. Milgram said the head of restructuring at a large regional bank recently told him private equity firms were abandoning deals and handing over portfolio companies at an “alarming rate”.

SVP specialises in hard assets such as Texas toll roads and Europe’s largest car park business. But recently Khosla directed a small team to study software. “We can’t for the life of us figure out who the losers and winners will be yet,” he said. “It’s too early.”

Since the start of 2025, the firm has invested $3.8bn but sold assets worth more than double that amount, far more than usual, suggesting it wants to have cash reserves as distressed opportunities emerge.

“Our view is that the [distressed] situations will overwhelm the amount of dry powder that’s out there,” said David Walch, partner and co-portfolio manager at asset manager King Street, referring to available capital.

Even the biggest players in private credit are preparing for the worst. Apollo’s chief executive, Marc Rowan, told investors in December that he needed to position the firm to make money “when something bad happens”.

This is not the first time in recent memory distressed investors have predicted a downturn. When Silicon Valley Bank imploded in 2023, there was a similar buzz that many more companies might buckle under the fatal combination of high interest rates and heavy debt loads.

Yet that wave of failures never came about. One executive of a top private capital firm said distressed investors were trying to drum up excitement.

“Hedge fund managers . . . have to create a sense of like, ‘the house is on fire, the house is on fire’. What they’re trying to do is to get banks to pull [credit] lines. They’re trying to create a frenzy because otherwise it’s going to be like watching paint dry,” they added.

FT : Shutting Hormuz is a template for China in Taiwan

Shutting Hormuz is a template for China in Taiwan
Beijing will seek to replicate Tehran’s playbook in the Taiwan Strait — and the global economic impact could be even worse

Iran did not need to sink a single tanker to shut down a fifth of the world’s oil supply. It took only a handful of missile and drone strikes to persuade insurers to pull coverage from vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz. Within days, the vital energy chokepoint was functionally closed. So far, the market is still refusing to bear the risk — despite Washington’s efforts to backstop reinsurance coverage, which would depend on US Navy escorts.

This is a replicable playbook. China is a vastly more capable actor than Iran that could use a more sophisticated version of the same economic blackmail in the Taiwan Strait. The US and its allies should start preparing accordingly.

Tehran’s strategy is one of economic attrition — calculating that the US cannot tolerate a high oil price indefinitely and will eventually back down. If and when it does, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards will control Hormuz. The oil will flow again — but only when Tehran says so, or for the right price.

Beijing has the capabilities to pursue a similar strategy without actually shooting at merchant ships. A Taiwan crisis could begin with a unilateral legal statement: Beijing would declare the right to control who and what comes and goes from the island. China could demonstrate resolve by firing missiles or bullets and declaring “exclusion zones”. Even short of outright conflict, if escalation risk seemed high, private carriers would face pressure to avoid the waters and airspace around Taiwan. The standard “Five Powers Clause” in commercial war-risk insurance terminates coverage in any conflict between the US and China. If it has proved hard to persuade shipping companies to risk sailing amid a few unguided Iranian drones, imagine asking them to take on the People’s Liberation Army.

The choice would therefore fall on Washington: accept a new normal in which Beijing has de facto control over Taiwan’s commerce — including its chipmaking facilities — or risk escalating to outright economic war and possibly a military conflict. Even if a real war were avoided, the macroeconomic and financial shock of such a crisis over Taiwan could be far greater than what we are seeing today in the Gulf. Moreover, the same countries that are currently scrambling would be the worst affected.

Imagine a scenario in which China tries to seize indirect control of Taiwan’s trade. The US and allies try to resupply the island anyway, daring China to interdict them. But China would not need to use lethal force against these convoys. It could simply harass them, or threaten to do so. If trade flows around Taiwan were physically disrupted, the energy shock to regional economies would be far greater than today. Taiwan, Japan and South Korea might find that they could not simply buy energy cargoes on the secondary market at any price, with no one to deliver them.

Additionally, an array of global industries would seize up, from electronics to cars. The Taiwan-based TSMC produces over 90 per cent of the world’s most advanced chips. There is no strategic reserve of semiconductors, no equivalent of International Energy Agency members releasing 400mn barrels. TSMC’s fab in Arizona cannot easily substitute for this lost supply. Taiwan’s government might ration energy allocation to industry if it faced shortages. Or, facing a blockade, Taiwan might curtail its chip production to pressure the world to ensure that it is resupplied.

Today, booming chip exports help cushion the Taiwanese and South Korean economies against the current energy price shock. In a Taiwan crisis, the chip supply itself would be at risk; it would make little sense to keep the energy-guzzling fabs turned on. A semiconductor supply shock would compound the economic and financial pain and could trigger panic in equity markets, particularly the US tech sector, risking rapid global financial contagion.

A Taiwan crisis may not be short. Beijing’s strategy, like Iran’s today, would depend on persuading the US that an authoritarian regime with substantial stockpiles of its own can outlast a coalition of democracies with smaller ones. China is building vast reserves of oil, chips, grain and a wide array of other commodities. The purpose of building a shadow fortress economy is precisely so that it does not have to be used.

The US and its allies need their own joint stockpiling arrangements, pre-positioned crisis logistics and a standing framework for economic crisis management. These will take time to establish, and they should be stress-tested before a crisis, not improvised during one. In any Taiwan crisis, the first order of business — prior to punishing China or decoupling supply chains — would be managing the global economic fallout.

The Hormuz emergency has shown what improvisation looks like. A Taiwan crisis would not be so forgiving.