FT : Mercedes risks US sales ban under Senate China bill Commerce panel approves

Mercedes risks US sales ban under Senate China bill
Commerce panel approves legislation barring companies with significant Chinese ownership from US market

Mercedes-Benz faces a possible ban on selling cars in the US after a Senate committee passed a bill that penalises groups with Chinese investment, in another sign of mounting rivalry between the US and China.

Mercedes, a German automaker that is 20 per cent owned by Chinese companies, had lobbied the Senate commerce committee to dilute the Connected Vehicle Security Act, which would also ban the import of battery systems from China’s CATL, the world’s biggest battery maker.

The bill bars automakers from selling connected vehicles — which use hardware and software for communications — in the US if they are more than 15 per cent owned by Chinese groups. It still requires approval by the full Senate before being reconciled with any version passed by the House of Representatives.

It comes amid mounting concern in Detroit that the entry of Chinese electric vehicles could decimate the US car industry. But it is also the latest sign of how Washington is cracking down on Chinese technology on security grounds.

Introduced by Republican Bernie Moreno of Ohio — a former Mercedes car dealer — and Democrat Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, the bill says giving adversaries access, control or influence over communication systems in connected vehicles creates risks that include “surveillance, espionage, cyber intrusion and disruption of critical infrastructure”.

At a meeting to debate the legislation, Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican who chairs the committee, criticised the decision, saying General Motors had lobbied for the measure in an effort to push Mercedes out of the US. His comment came after the panel rejected two amendments that would have eased the restrictions.

In lobbying for the bill to be watered down, Mercedes had highlighted its big footprint in the US, where it supports 160,000 jobs across factories, suppliers and dealers. It said it backed rules “designed to protect US national security” but “remains committed to ensuring that any legislation does not impact our operations”.

Entities linked to Chinese carmakers Geely and BAIC combined own roughly a fifth of shares in Mercedes. The German company said “no shareholder holds more than 10 per cent of our stock, and our major shareholders are not directly represented on the supervisory board or have any control or decision-making authority”.

John Moolenaar, a Michigan lawmaker who heads the House China committee, and Debbie Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, welcomed the committee’s decision. The legislators, who have introduced a companion bill in the House, thanked the senators for “rejecting weak amendments” and passing “a strong bill that keeps China out of our market”.

Rush Doshi, a China expert at Georgetown University and former White House official, said Mercedes had raised the ire of the left and right, unions and venture capitalists. “This is usually a hard thing to do.”

Ahead of the vote, Chris McGuire, another former White House official, of the Council on Foreign Relations, said he was very concerned about efforts to weaken the language on battery-management systems, which he said posed a big security threat.

“The electronics inside modern batteries decide when it charges, how hot it gets and whether the safety limits hold. If a foreign adversary controls those electronics, it could use that access to push the battery past its limits until it catches fire, effectively turning car batteries into car bombs,” he said.

Craig Singleton, a US-China expert at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said the 22-9 vote to reject an amendment weakening the provision on batteries “underscored a broad bipartisan consensus that adversary-linked batteries and battery-management systems do not belong in America’s connected vehicle supply chain”.

“These systems are becoming smarter, more connected and more deeply integrated into vehicle operations, creating potential pathways for surveillance, cyber intrusion and disruption of critical transportation networks,” said Singleton.

CATL said vehicle manufacturers, rather than the group, maintained access to and control over all battery-management system data flows. “They inherently do not have the capability to transmit data externally, nor do they contain independent channels to access vehicle or user information.”

FT : Uber founder Travis Kalanick raises $1.7bn for new start-up Andreessen Horo

Uber founder Travis Kalanick raises $1.7bn for new start-up
Andreessen Horowitz and the ride-hailing group join funding round

Uber founder Travis Kalanick has announced a $1.7bn debt and equity funding deal for his latest venture, to build a “computer for the physical world”, backed by venture firm Andreessen Horowitz and Uber itself.

Tech investor Ben Horowitz, co-founder of the venture firm leading the funding round for Kalanick’s new venture Atoms, will also join the start-up’s board. Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan are among the banks lending to the start-up as part of the deal.

Kalanick has pursued several new businesses since he left the ride-hailing group in 2017 following a boardroom clash. He is still involved in CloudKitchens, a network of “dark kitchens” designed to serve food delivery apps that he has run since 2018.

On Wednesday, Kalanick said that the fundraising round would support Atoms’ work to automate industrial processes by deploying advanced robotics in a number of sectors.

“Mining, construction, heavy transport, food production are just a few examples of atom-heavy industries awaiting massive digital transformation,” Kalanick said in a blog post. “Industrial AI is getting ready to power the next Industrial Revolution.”

Kalanick renamed real estate group City Storage Systems as Atoms when he launched the new business in March.

Horowitz said Atoms was “the realisation of Travis’s multi-decade long vision and ambition to digitise the physical world”.

“It takes a rare kind of entrepreneur to change these old-school, heavy parts of our economy,” he said in a blog post. “They need a gritty work ethic, drive, and range that spans across domains, from software architecture to mechanical engineering. Travis is that guy.”

During Kalanick’s tenure at Uber, the company suffered from reports of managerial dysfunction. Former engineer Susan Fowler accused Uber under his leadership of fostering a culture that turned a blind eye to sexual harassment and discrimination.

A boardroom clash ensued and, following a scathing report by former US attorney-general Eric Holder in 2017, the Uber co-founder stepped down.

CloudKitchens has also been at the centre of complaints around cultural issues, the FT previously reported. The company in 2023 made lay-offs and closed several locations in a bid to rein in expenses.

Kalanick sold his final shares and stepped down from Uber’s board in 2019. The new deal comes as the company he founded is grappling with a growing challenge from “robotaxis” such as those made by Alphabet’s Waymo.

Uber has made a series of investments in self-driving vehicle start-ups including Nuro, Wayve and Waabi.

Pronto, an autonomous vehicle company serving the mining industry that was founded by former Uber engineer Anthony Levandowski, is also now part of Atoms after Kalanick acquired the company in April.

In 2020, Levandowski was sentenced to 18 months in prison for stealing trade secrets from Google when he joined Uber. He was later pardoned by US President Donald Trump.

Kalanick said on Wednesday that he regretted not partnering with Andreessen in the past and that Uber suffered by not having the venture firm on its board during the period when he was ousted.

FT : Why the US is losing Chinese AI stars More entrepreneurs from China believe

Why the US is losing Chinese AI stars
More entrepreneurs from China believe there are now greater opportunities at home than in Silicon Valley

In 2019, Moonshot AI’s founder Yang Zhilin completed his PhD at Carnegie Mellon University in just four years — about two fewer than the standard. Apple wanted him. Google and Meta had already hosted him as an intern. Postdoctoral doors at Stanford and MIT stood open. He chose none of them. He returned to China.

His CMU supervisor, Russ Salakhutdinov, later recalled Yang’s reasoning: “If he didn’t at least try starting his own company, he would regret it for the rest of his life.”

That decision — which once seemed a contrarian bet — now looks like foresight. Beijing-based Moonshot last week released Kimi K3, a large language model that has been ranked alongside flagship offerings from OpenAI and Anthropic. Elon Musk called it “impressive work”.

Silicon Valley awoke to a question: why did America let him go? But one narrative, that Yang was pushed out by US immigration policy, is incomplete. Salakhutdinov has stressed he had multiple pathways to stay. An Apple executive even offered Yang a role in Apple’s Beijing office, accommodating his desire to be home. Yet Yang chose to build his own AI company, giving it a name taken from his favourite Pink Floyd album Dark Side of the Moon. 

The deeper explanation lies in a shifting calculus: the growing pull of China’s AI ecosystem. Yang’s trajectory underscores that shift. A graduate of Tsinghua University, he co-authored leading papers such as Transformer-XL during his CMU years — work that shaped the transformer architecture underpinning today’s large language models. Within three years of starting Moonshot, his 300-person team has produced a model that competes with the world’s best.

Would he have been able to achieve the same had he founded Moonshot in the US? Maybe. But multiple Chinese founders with similar backgrounds have told me they found it easier to build a start-up in China. Partly this is due to their larger networks at home and a more familiar culture. Some founders also cite a unified regulatory framework as well as a much deeper and more productive talent pool.

Of course, there are lots of challenges to operating in China as an AI company: tight constraints on advanced computing power; the geopolitical risks of having your products banned overseas; the risk of political intervention and censorship; and a much shallower market for fundraising compared with the US.

But one Chinese entrepreneur told me that although his start-up could probably reach a valuation at least 10 times higher in the US, he had a much better chance in China of developing AI for tasks such as autonomous driving that would exceed human capacity in the next five years.

Most Chinese students in science, maths and technology have, historically, chosen to stay in the US after their PhDs but the number of returnees is reported to be increasing. Even for those who chose to stay, more have started to return mid-career. One reason for some is the political and social environment. A Stanford survey of 1,304 US-based Chinese-descent scientists in 2024 revealed that 73 per cent of them felt unsafe as academic researchers, with 65 per cent pointing to fears around “anti-Asian hate and violence”.

The debate over Yang’s departure has become a proxy for broader US concern about AI talent retention. Some in Silicon Valley have called for green cards to be stapled to every AI PhD. But that misses a larger structural reality.

China is no longer merely a net importer of US-trained talent; it has built its own pipeline. Stanford’s Hoover Institution tracked 356 researchers behind DeepSeek’s core models and found that 53.5 per cent had never studied or worked outside China. Among those with US experience, 70 per cent ultimately returned to China.

Yang belongs to a vanguard for whom returning is not a fallback but a first choice. His decision was not driven by visa uncertainty but by entrepreneurial conviction. Yet the message America sends to the next Yang Zhilin matters. The US visa system is built around employment, not entrepreneurship. That works less well for founders.

For decades, America’s tech dominance rested on a simple formula: attract the world’s brightest minds and keep them. Yang Zhilin’s story suggests that approach is being tested — not just because the US has become less welcoming but because China has become more magnetic.

The question is not whether Yang made the right choice. It is how many more like him will make the same one — with a conviction that the future they want to build lies elsewhere. 

FT : Segro board signals it would back £14bn takeover after battle with US bidde

Segro board signals it would back £14bn takeover after battle with US bidder
Real estate group Prologis’s ‘best and final’ approach for London-listed rival follows previous £13.5bn bid

UK real estate group Segro said it was minded to recommend an improved £14bn takeover offer from US rival Prologis after a weeks-long takeover battle.

Prologis on Wednesday raised its bid for London-listed Segro to a “best and final” offer of 1,032p per share, up from an offer of 993p that valued the UK company at £13.5bn announced on Monday.

The fourth bid came after Segro had insisted that remaining as an independent company would provide superior returns for its shareholders and said its shares had been valued at about 1,300p.

The deal would be the biggest for a London-listed group this year.

Segro’s board said the new proposal was “at a level that it would be minded to recommend” to shareholders if a firm proposal arrives ahead of an extended August 12 deadline for the bidder to finalise its offer or walk away.

Prologis said late on Wednesday that it welcomed Segro’s announcement and that it was “ready to work with the Segro board in reaching an outcome that delivers value for all stakeholders.”

The latest bid would pay investors mostly with shares in Prologis but includes up to £3.5bn in cash. Segro shareholders would own about 9 per cent of Prologis following a combination if the cash option is fully taken up.

Segro said Prologis had agreed to add a secondary London listing of its shares after any deal. It will now allow Prologis to conduct due diligence.

Prologis has been increasing pressure on Segro in recent days to engage with its overtures. Dan Letter, Prologis chief executive, told the FT this week that the UK group was relying on “very aspirational” projections as it resisted the takeover bid.

“We have listened to feedback from shareholders and . . . improved our proposal to make a compelling offer to the Segro board. We run Prologis with discipline and this is our best and final offer,” Letter said earlier on Wednesday as he announced the bid.

Prologis’s offer has gained backing from leading shareholders, including the Norwegian wealth fund. Dutch group APG Asset Management, which owns 5 per cent of Segro and more than 2 per cent of Prologis, said the two groups should “enter into formal engagement and carefully consider the opportunities such a combination may present”.

However, a top 10 shareholder told the FT that the latest offer was still too low. “I will be waiting for what the board says. I had in mind some price levels at which I’d say to the board ‘I think you should engage . . . to either get a better deal or open the books’, but it’s frustratingly below that.”

He continued: “They made an approach in 2024, they’ve made four different offers now. If over the next 12 months Segro’s share price is disappointing, they’ll be back.”

He also said Segro was a “unique” asset and that “you can’t buy another Segro”.

Segro shares closed at 895p on Wednesday.

NYT : Trump’s New Trade Fights (and Deals) President Trump has resumed his appro

Trump’s New Trade Fights (and Deals)
President Trump has resumed his approach of big threats against some trading partners and generous pacts with others. Experts see new risks.

Andrew here. For years, Warren Buffett has warned that the proliferation of nuclear weapons represents “the great problem of mankind.” The news that the U.S. has agreed to a broad nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia is likely to cause consternation in Omaha. It should also prompt the rest of the world to consider the implications.

Buffett once said, “We can’t put the genie back in the bottle — but we can keep that genie contained.” The deal will likely mean billions of dollars for U.S. companies, but lawmakers in the U.S. and in Israel are raising questions.

One other issue to consider: Buffett recently said that A.I. may represent as big of a risk as nuclear weapons. Now think of the combined risk, in light of OpenAI’s admission on Tuesday that two of its models broke out of their “sandbox” and hacked another company to cheat on a test. More below.

New carrots and sticks
Trade is back on President Trump’s agenda, with new threats against Canada on billions of dollars’ worth of goods, and a major nuclear accord with Saudi Arabia.

The moves reflect a return to the Trump administration’s approach of carrots for favored allies and threats of stiff tariffs to intimidate others into acquiescence. But many of the administration’s moves carry big risks, experts say.

Example A: Saudi Arabia. The administration is expected to announce on Wednesday a broad accord that could let the Middle Eastern country eventually enrich its own uranium, according to The Times and others.

The long-discussed proposal — initially broached during the first Trump administration — is meant to tighten ties with the Saudis as the war with Iran has strained relations. But it’s also expected to give U.S. nuclear companies, including Westinghouse, billions of dollars worth of contracts.

More money could come if, after the conclusion of a two-year study, Washington allows Riyadh to enrich nuclear material on Saudi soil. Americans would build an enrichment facility for the Saudis under a “black box” arrangement that wouldn’t transfer sensitive technology to the Gulf state, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Yet skeptics worry about nuclear arms proliferation. Saudi Arabia wouldn’t be subject to the stronger nonproliferation terms that the U.S. required of the United Arab Emirates in a 2009 nuclear deal.

Example B: generic drugs. Makers of generic pharmaceuticals must onshore their manufacturing to the U.S. within two years, or face a 100 percent tariff starting in 2028, President Trump wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. (It would go up to 200 percent in 2029.)

Analysts warn that the threat could push up treatment costs for millions of Americans, instead of fulfilling Trump’s promise of lower drug costs.

Example C: Canada. Polling suggests that Canadians are willing to support Prime Minister Mark Carney in fighting back hard against Trump’s threatened 50 percent tariffs on an array of Canadian goods, set to take effect next month.

One thing to watch: whether the courts uphold the Trump administration’s use of a provision within the Tariff Act of 1930, known as Section 338, to justify the Canadian tariffs.

Example D: more tariffs. The administration is set to impose new duties on dozens of trading partners by Friday to replace a set of 10 percent tariffs, imposed under a 1974 law, that are set to expire this week, according to Bloomberg.

WSJ : This AI Tech Billionaire Just Doubled His Net Worth. His Ex Asked for Half

This AI Tech Billionaire Just Doubled His Net Worth. His Ex Asked for Half.
South Korea’s romanticized ‘marriage of the century’ blew up in a real-life serial drama everybody is calling the ‘divorce of the century’

SEOUL—Chey Tae-won, the billionaire atop blockbuster memory chip maker SK Hynix, announced the breakup of his fairy tale marriage to the daughter of a past president in a three-page letter to a South Korean newspaper a decade ago.

In the letter, Chey acknowledged he loved another woman and had a child with her. In court papers cited by local media, he said he didn’t believe his 27-year marriage could be saved and quoted the opening of Leo Tolstoy’s novel “Anna Karenina,” a tragedy that plots its own love triangle: “Happy families are all alike; every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.”

The yearslong divorce battle nears a climax Friday, when a panel of appeals court judges is scheduled to decide how to divide Chey’s roughly $5 billion fortune with his 65-year-old ex-wife, Roh Soh-yeong.

The case, known here as the divorce of the century, has mesmerized South Koreans—a real-life K-drama of money, romance, corruption and betrayal. Its expected finale comes as Chey, also 65, is seemingly having the time of his life.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and Chey quaffed whiskey at a fried chicken restaurant last month with the gusto of two billionaires at the pinnacle of the world’s AI investment bonanza. Chey offered to pay everybody’s tab at the packed restaurant, and the crowd shouted “SK! SK!”


Huang and Chey, whose company makes the memory chips that helped fuel Nvidia’s rise to become one of the world’s biggest companies, had plenty to celebrate. SK Hynix’s stock jumped roughly 10-fold since the start of 2025, helping more than double Chey’s net worth.

The opening settlement demand by Roh: half of Chey’s assets, which are mostly held in stock of the SK conglomerate’s holding company that also has recently ballooned in value. Chey and Roh declined to comment.

Chey, a nephew of the SK conglomerate’s founder, posts Instagram photos of himself to tens of thousands of followers, posing with Silicon Valley chief executives such as Huang, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. Chey, who goes by “Tony” in the West, played golf at Mar-a-Lago before a meeting with President Trump last fall. Joe Biden had called him a pal during a 2022 visit.

Chey also has twice been convicted, imprisoned—and later pardoned by two South Korean presidents—for white-collar crimes.

Roh appealed a roughly $50 million divorce judgment in 2022, which would have been a fraction of Chey’s assets. She called the sum a “denial of women’s commitment to the household.” Two subsequent trials failed to resolve the dispute.

Chey’s ex-wife now wants an appeals court to grant her a higher proportion of Chey’s fortune, fattened by the global AI frenzy, using an updated asset valuation. Chey has argued that Roh played no role in SK’s recent success and that judges should base the divvy on an earlier measure—before his company’s stock boom.

The ruling could push Roh’s settlement to as much as $1 billion, said South Korean divorce attorneys not involved in the case. A payout of that size would dilute Chey’s ownership grip on SK, exposing him to greater risk with activist investors or other outside pressure. Chey’s legal team believes the figure could be much lower.

South Korean newspapers declared their 1988 nuptials as “the wedding of the century.” The ceremony was held at the presidential Blue House just months after Roh’s father, Roh Tae-woo, became South Korea’s first president after the collapse of the country’s military dictatorship.

In December 2015, the couple’s happily-ever-after image shattered with the publication of Chey’s intention to seek a “clean end” with his wife.

In the hours after the humiliating public disclosure, Roh told friends she wondered whether she had been too selfish and inconsiderate of her husband’s emotions, according to local media reports. She also said she would defend her household and keep the family together.

“I will not divorce him,” she said at the time.

Behind bars
Chey and Roh had met as graduate students at the University of Chicago, and the powerhouse pairing—a marriage of political and business elites—embodied a fresh image for South Korea. The country had hosted the 1988 Summer Olympics and sought to put its decades of brutal military rule behind it.

At the ceremony, Roh wore a simple white wedding dress. Chey paired an ivory suit with a black tie. The country’s then-Prime Minister Lee Hyun-jae officiated. “The two of you now, as one flesh, should create a family that devotes itself to the nation and its people,” Lee told them.

Scandal later emerged involving the Roh administration’s dealmaking with SK. In 1992, SK was awarded a license to operate the country’s second mobile-phone network.

Kim Dae-jung, an opposition lawmaker who later became president, called it a “shameless act of presidential nepotism” and the “absolute climax of corrupt, political-business collusion.” Members of Roh’s party also voiced outrage.

Within days, SK returned the license. The conglomerate, which is now South Korea’s largest telecommunications player, said this month the license was granted lawfully and based on merit.

Roh Tae-woo, who died in 2021, faced various criminal charges after serving as president from 1988 to 1993. In one case, he was convicted of taking illegal payments from the heads of South Korea’s biggest conglomerates and creating a personal slush fund totaling hundreds of millions of dollars.

Evidence surfaced in court documents submitted in Roh’s divorce that her father had allegedly spent some of the money on clandestine payments to SK. Roh Soh-yeong’s lawyers submitted a handwritten note that Roh’s mother had apparently saved. It wasn’t clear who wrote it, but it showed Sunkyong—SK’s prior name—written alongside “30 billion won,” roughly $23 million.

Roh’s lawyers said the payments were made to Chey’s father, alleging it was money the ruling SK family might have used to expand the conglomerate’s businesses. Chey’s lawyers have denied that SK received such payments.

The note and other evidence persuaded an appeals court in 2024 to order Chey to give his ex-wife 35% of his assets, amounting to nearly $1 billion at the time. The supreme court last year confirmed the couple’s divorce, but left the divorce settlement for a lower court to decide. Separately, the court ordered Chey to pay Roh the equivalent of $1.4 million for the emotional distress he caused.

Chey also had criminal convictions. He was sentenced in 2003 to three years in prison for illegal trading and accounting fraud. He spent months behind bars until being released on bail. A court granted him a suspended sentence. Later, a presidential pardon wiped his record clean.

In 2013, Chey returned to prison to serve a four-year sentence for embezzling roughly $42 million in company funds. The money funded speculative personal investments that were used to help cover personal trading losses accrued years earlier.

Chey denied the embezzlement allegation, saying the transactions were legitimate corporate investments. “I don’t know what it is that I failed to prove,” he said in court, “but I can honestly say that I did not commit this crime.”

A South Korean judge criticized Chey for failing to express a sincere view about his responsibility. Chey later said, during the appeals trial, that he had made a wrong decision and “deeply regretted everything.”

While behind bars, Chey cemented his power over SK’s controlling company through the merger of two SK affiliates. He also published a 229-page book, titled “New Exploration, Social Enterprise,” detailing how governments can create incentives for companies to help solve social problems. He received a second presidential pardon in August 2015.

He ended the year revealing his plans for divorce, leaving his wife for a younger woman.

Emotional distress
Chey’s partner, Kim Hee-young, is 50 years old, according to corporate filings for a foundation she leads. Kim, who uses the English name Chloe, has posted several photos with her teenage daughter.

The two established the T&C Foundation in 2018, a charitable group involved in youth scholarships and educational programs. They officially appeared together at an event the following year, where Chey said he had come to see himself as a coldhearted businessman with zero sympathy.

“I reflected on my past,” he said at the time, “and realized that I had lived my life wrongly.”

Roh finally agreed to a divorce months later. “I think it might be right to let my husband go find the ‘happiness’ he so desperately wants,” she said in a social-media post. She later sued Kim for emotional distress, winning a $1.5 million payout.

Roh operates the Art Center Nabi, South Korea’s first media-art museum, which had occupied a floor of SK’s downtown headquarters. Yi Won-kon, a professor emeritus of fine arts who advised Roh in the center’s early days, said he had initially doubted a wealthy socialite without formal training in media-art theory could succeed. He now acknowledges he was wrong.

The SK affiliate managing the company headquarters accused Roh’s art center of illegally occupying the space in 2023, citing a lapsed rental contract. In June, Roh moved the art center near South Korea’s former royal palace. The debut exhibit, featuring kinetic artwork, is titled, “A Pregnant Pause.”

Chey and Roh both attended their youngest daughter’s wedding in October 2024. Their daughter walked down the aisle alone. All three of their adult children have worked at SK subsidiaries. Only one does now.

Chey and SK Hynix remain on an epic streak. The company’s market value surpassed $1 trillion in late May. A recent plan for SK Hynix to invest more than $250 billion in chipmaking production in South Korea drew praise from President Lee Jae Myung, who referred to Chey and his counterpart at Samsung as “heroes of the nation and the people.”

On July 10, Chey rang the bell at New York’s Nasdaq to celebrate SK Hynix’s U.S. trading debut. The listing generated more than $26 billion for the Korean memory-chip company.

In a November social-media post, Roh expressed nostalgia as she prepared to leave the home where she had raised a family and lived for 37 years. “Now that I am over 60, everything feels precious,” she said.

Roh uploaded photos of her wedding dress, luxury handbags and other possessions. She wrote that her heart ached most looking at a poster her three children made when they were young. They affixed headshot cutouts of their parents from photos and placed them above paper cutouts of a wedding dress and a tuxedo.

The children decorated the poster with hearts and stars. They also left short messages.

“True love,” one said.

WSJ : Ralph Lauren’s Polo Bar in Talks to Move to a New Office Tower Securing an

Ralph Lauren’s Polo Bar in Talks to Move to a New Office Tower
Securing an exclusive dining spot is crucial to New York City office buildings

Developer Related Cos. is in talks to bring Ralph Lauren’s Polo Bar to the new Midtown Manhattan tower it is building—the latest sign that marquee restaurants have become an increasingly important weapon in the battle to fill trophy office buildings.

Polo Bar has emerged as one of New York’s most exclusive dining spots since clothing brand Ralph Lauren opened the doors in 2015, attracting celebrities such as Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce, and the Kardashians. Known for its equestrian-inspired decor, the wood-paneled restaurant just off Fifth Avenue has become one of the city’s hardest tables to book.

Now, Related is close to luring Polo Bar four blocks north of its current location on East 55th Street to Madison Avenue, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Related broke ground earlier this year on a 53-story office tower it plans to build at 625 Madison Ave. Related is scheduled to complete the tower in the summer of 2029.

The New York developer, best known for its sprawling Hudson Yards complex on Manhattan’s West Side, is trying to fill the Madison Avenue tower with hedge funds, private-equity firms and other deep-pocketed tenants willing to pay some of Manhattan’s highest office rents.

More than ever, landing a destination restaurant has become part of that strategy. Landlords increasingly see them as a critical branding tool that gives their tenants a coveted place to entertain and impress clients without leaving the building.

Other examples include One Vanderbilt, the 1,401-foot-tall office tower next to Grand Central Terminal where chef Daniel Boulud’s Le Pavillon helped attract such blue-chip tenants as Carlyle and TD Securities.

After spending hundreds of millions of dollars redeveloping the former Sony Building into a trophy office tower, Olayan Group signed Michelin-starred Cote Korean Steakhouse, another perennial fixture on the list of tough New York reservations to land.

“We knew we had to commit to the highest-caliber restaurant to validate the stature of the building,” said Mary Ann Tighe, the CBRE broker who led leasing at the tower.

For many of these landlords, the strategy has paid off. The buildings that have attracted signature restaurants are also among the small group of Manhattan towers pushing office rents to record levels.

Related is seeking rents exceeding $200 to $400 a square foot for the upper floors of 625 Madison, according to a person familiar with the negotiations. Average Midtown office rentals are around $85 a square foot. The developer is close to finalizing a roughly 150,000-square-foot lease with private-equity firm General Atlantic as the anchor tenant and is in talks with software investment firm Veritas for about 90,000 square feet, according to people familiar with the matter.

Manhattan landlords are able to reach for high rents because New York has emerged as the country’s strongest office market. Leasing activity totaled 7.88 million square feet in the second quarter this year, 24% above its five-year quarterly average. The availability rate fell to 14.4%, according to CBRE.

The city has benefited from an influx of AI companies and a concentration of finance and law firms that are demanding employees spend more time in the office. Its extensive public-transit network also has made commuting easier than in most U.S. cities, helping office attendance rebound.

Not every landlord is benefiting equally. Tenants are increasingly gravitating to buildings with ample amenities like gyms and rooftop terraces while more ordinary office buildings continue to struggle.

For landlords, the restaurant is part of the sales pitch. “There are only a handful of restaurants that are on that same level as Polo Bar,” said Evan Margolin, vice chairman of real-estate services firm JLL. “Everybody knows it. Everybody wants to go there. So, to say, ‘Hey, I’m in the Polo Bar building.’ I think that’s pretty cool.”

FT : Germany to buy stakes in defence start-ups Measure is one of more than 150

Germany to buy stakes in defence start-ups
Measure is one of more than 150 designed to boost funding for start-ups in Europe’s largest economy

Germany is planning to buy direct stakes in defence technology start-ups, as part of several measures designed to boost innovation and help revive its stagnating economy.

Friedrich Merz’s government on Wednesday said the state would invest directly in defence ventures through development bank KfW, introduce tax incentives and streamline digitalised processes to set up a company.

“We are laying the foundations for the next generation of German global market leaders,” said Katherina Reiche, economy minister. “It has three objectives: to make it easier to set up a business, to accelerate growth and to keep innovation in Germany.”

The move signals a more dirigiste approach to industrial policy, and a response to longstanding complaints from entrepreneurs that Germany is stifling innovation through bureaucracy and a lack of venture capital. While a top recipient of VC funding in the EU alongside France, Germany has consistently lagged behind the UK and the US.

After winning general elections last year, Merz has failed to revive Europe’s largest economy, which is reliant on traditional manufacturing industries, such as car production and steelmaking. These export-oriented sectors have suffered from cheaper Chinese competition, forcing groups such as Volkswagen to shed jobs and shut plants in Germany.

Merz’s coalition of his Christian Democrats and the Social Democrats has sought to spur innovation, notably by leveraging the country’s massive rearmament push.

The government is planning to spend more than €700bn on defence by 2030, and wants to maximise the spillover effect for the entire economy, people close to government have said.

“Large financing rounds are often led by international investors,” the government’s bill reads, adding: “This can conflict with technological sovereignty and the long-term preservation of value creation and jobs in Germany and Europe.”

The government will set up a “new vehicle for direct investments in start-ups and scale-ups”, according to proposals seen by the FT. “This vehicle will support companies that clearly produce and provide products and services with military applications” including those subject to tight export controls. The government will make it easier for start-ups to participate in public procurement.

Among the more than 150 measures proposed, Berlin also vows to develop a “strategically oriented arms export policy that provides reliability to defence and dual-use start-ups and scale-ups”. It also promises to review export control licences more quickly, while paying greater attention to the potential outflow of sensitive technology.

The government plans to accelerate the digitisation of bureaucratic procedures so that data for tax, social security and licences will be processed in one place.

The plans were welcomed by some defence start-ups. Marc Wietfeld, co-founder and chief executive of the unmanned vehicle maker ARX Robotics, said Berlin was “sending a clear signal that start-ups and scale-ups are central to this country’s future”.

“Governments and the military are among our most important customers and partners,’’ he added. ‘‘This level of commitment makes me more confident than ever that Germany is serious about building the industries it needs to secure prosperity and credible deterrence.”

Others in the sector voiced scepticism about the idea of government taking equity stakes in private businesses, adding that it would be better for them to support start-ups simply by buying their products.

>>> Alphabet earnings call notes -- AI momentum accelerates as search and cloud

Alphabet earnings call notes -- AI momentum accelerates as search and cloud deliver strong growth
  • AI is driving growth across the entire company. Management repeatedly emphasized that AI is no longer just an investment theme but a meaningful revenue driver across Search, Google Cloud, YouTube, advertising, and enterprise software. Alphabet highlighted strong adoption of Gemini models, AI Mode in Search, and AI-powered advertising tools as evidence that AI monetization is accelerating.
  • Google Cloud delivered exceptional results and remains a major growth engine. Cloud revenue surged 82% yr/yr, driven by demand for AI infrastructure and enterprise AI solutions. Management also noted Cloud backlog reached $514 bln, customer acquisition more than doubled from a year ago, and nearly 90% of Fortune 100 companies now use Gemini Enterprise, reinforcing confidence that Cloud should remain one of GOOG's fastest-growing businesses.
  • Search continues to benefit from AI rather than being disrupted by it. Management said AI Mode has surpassed 1 bln monthly active users, while AI Overviews and AI Mode are generating incremental search queries instead of replacing traditional search activity. GOOG also said AI-powered search is now sending billions of clicks to websites each week, helping alleviate concerns that AI could significantly reduce web traffic.
  • Advertising monetization is improving as AI expands. GOOG reported continued strong monetization from AI Overviews and highlighted that longer, more conversational AI searches create additional opportunities for highly targeted advertising. AI Max has already been adopted by 500,000 advertisers, while advertisers using GOOG's AI-powered campaign tools are seeing roughly 15% higher conversions at similar returns on ad spend.
  • Developer and enterprise adoption of Gemini continues to accelerate. GOOG now has more than 9 mln monthly developers building with Gemini, API token processing increased to approximately 22 bln tokens per minute, and enterprise AI usage continues to expand rapidly. Management views this ecosystem growth as an important competitive advantage that should support future revenue opportunities.
  • YouTube continues to strengthen both engagement and monetization. YouTube advertising revenue increased 13%, helped by strong brand and direct-response advertising. Management also highlighted record World Cup engagement, growing AI-powered features such as Ask YouTube, and subscription revenue (Premium and Music) growing faster than advertising, creating multiple long-term growth drivers.

FT : Southern Water and ex-CEO face criminal charges over wastewater tests Matth

Southern Water and ex-CEO face criminal charges over wastewater tests
Matthew Wright faces fraud allegations in Environment Agency’s first charges against a water boss

Southern Water, its former chief executive and three other former employees face criminal charges brought by the UK’s Environment Agency over allegations they undertook a “carefully planned and extensive fraud” to cheat sewage treatment compliance checks.

The agency said on Wednesday that Matthew Wright, the utility company’s former CEO, is among the four former employees. The charges mark the agency’s first criminal proceedings taken against a water company’s boss for alleged failings on their watch.

The EA alleges that between January 2012 and December 2017, the four conspired to defraud the agency and the UK’s water regulator Ofwat by “manipulating” its self-monitoring testing regime by carrying out “artificial no-flow events at wastewater treatment works”.

“What is alleged against [them] involves carefully planned and extensive fraud and dishonesty at a high level within the company and on a large scale,” Lord Justice Popplewell and Mr Justice Hilliard wrote in a judgment on Wednesday.

The scheme is alleged to have involved the removal of sewage from treatment sites by tankers “in order to create no-flow results, with a view to covering up pollution and deceiving those whose function is to protect the public from such harm”, according to the judgment.

The self-monitoring regime requires water companies to take samples at their wastewater treatment works and report the results to the EA.

According to Wednesday’s judgment, the EA alleges that the scheme allowed Southern Water to avoid penalties of about £45mn while the regulator’s own assessment put the figure higher.

The EA said: “Strict rules govern how samples must be taken to ensure their independence and accuracy. It is an offence if there is evidence that flows or data are deliberately manipulated to avoid compliance checks.”

Conspiracy to defraud carries a maximum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment.

Stephen Shergold, Wright’s solicitor at White & Case, said he “denies all wrongdoing and has co-operated fully with the Environment Agency’s investigation”.

Southern Water, which serves more than 4mn customers across Kent, Sussex and Hampshire, would separately face charges of breaching environmental permits in connection with the same conduct, the agency said. Three further individuals will also face charges linked to failure to comply with environmental permits.

In 2021 Southern Water received a record £90mn fine for illegally dumping between 16bn and 21bn litres of raw sewage from 17 different sewage plants.

Three former staff members at the company were separately convicted of obstructing data collection by the Environment Agency in 2019, but this marks the first time a CEO of a water company has faced criminal charges.

Southern Water said in a statement: “The charges relate to a historic set of failures between 2012 and 2017. These were uncovered through an internal company investigation in 2017. As soon as they were identified, Southern Water reported them to regulators, including the Environment Agency.”

It added: “Under new leadership and backed by new shareholders, we’ve radically addressed our culture, governance and operations. We’re serious about further change and improvement, and are investing in our largest-ever programme to protect the environment.”