FT : Caxton hedge fund chief warns on brinkmanship damage to US

Caxton hedge fund chief warns on brinkmanship damage to US

One of the hedge fund industry’s most successful money managers has warned that dysfunction in Washington has damaged the US economy, leaving the Federal Reserve with little option but to continue its policy of extraordinary monetary easing indefinitely. “It’s clear to us now that the US economy just isn’t going to reach escape velocity,” said Andrew Law, head of Caxton Associates, in a wide-ranging and rare interview with the Financial Times. “Tapering is off the table for the foreseeable future.”

Mr Law’s stark outlook for the US contrasts with widely-held expectations that the US economy will bounce back quickly in the coming months. Most investors and Wall Street analysts expect the Fed to begin “tapering” its programme of quantitative easing in December. Caxton, which is 30 years old this year, has made its clients over $13bn in net gains over its lifetime, according to data provider LCH Investments, making it one of the best performing hedge funds alongside the likes of George Soros. Like Mr Soros, Caxton specialises in making money from shifts in the global economy – betting on changes in countries’ economic circumstances through bonds, currencies and derivatives. $1,000 invested with Caxton in 1983 would now be worth just under $200,000. The 47-year old Mr Law said the shutdown and debt-ceiling debate in Washington had “undoubtedly” caused damage to the country’s economy. “What happened [last week] was just another can kicking exercise,” he said of the political deal reached between Democrats and Republicans in Washington to raise the cap on the government’s ability to borrow. “The problem has not been solved and the hopes for a grand bargain are in tatters . . . the lack of visibility is very damaging.” Caxton closely guards its secrecy and rarely speaks about its trading activities. The firm has snapped up US bonds of various maturities in recent weeks because it believes that bond prices will rise as markets price in a longer-than-expected period of low rates in the coming months. Mr Law’s prognosis is all the more startling since Caxton was particularly bullish on prospects for the US earlier this year. The firm had made hundreds of millions shorting Treasury bonds. “We just don’t see how the economy is going to accelerate in the foreseeable future,” he said. “Sequester spending cuts, the debt ceiling and shutdown have all taken their toll . . .  there are no incentives for the corporate world to go out and spend right now . . . that, and the housing market are critical. You’ve already seen earnings release statements for companies mentioning shutdown as a reason for a drop-off in orders.” The grim outlook, while contrarian, is shared by a number of hedge funds. Last week, Jeffrey Gundlach, founder of DoubleLine Capital, one of the most influential US bond market investors also said he believed US growth had stuttered, and tapering was unlikely, making bonds an attractive investment. Caxton also believes the dollar will continue to weaken against the euro – potentially precipitating a currency fight with the eurozone. “It will be fascinating to see how the ECB [European Central Bank] responds,” said Mr Law, adding that one likely option for Frankfurt would be for it to lower rates. “They are not going to be too pleased [with a weakening dollar],” he said. The result of the German election meant the ECB now has a freer hand to act, he argued.

>>> Barron’s Saturday summary: Money managers bullish on stocks through to Mid 2

Barron’s Saturday summary: Money managers bullish on stocks through to Mid 2014; positive on AT&T, OUTR; cautious on AMZN

Cover story: Barrons Big Money poll finds money managers think stocks are the best place for investor money over the next 12 months, with half thinking the U.S. will be the best-performing market during that time; favored stocks include AAPL, GOOG, MSFT, Samsung, EMC, KMI, CF, while TSLA, NFLX, AMZN, FB, and CRM appear too richly priced.

Features: 1) Positive on T: Carrier is posting strong subscriber growth, shares could rise to about $40 in the next year, which in tandem with a strong yield could generate a 20% total return for investors. 2) Story says Odds are the current political standoff will continue, maybe until we hit the debt ceiling again, adding the only way to avoid another battle is if bipartisan House and Senate panel can formulate a mutually acceptable budget blueprint by December 13. 3) Positive on CAN, AET, RTN, WU: Four companies focus on returning cash to shareholders not just via dividends, but by buying back shares on a regular basis.

Tech Trader: Cautious on AMZN: Range of estimated Kindle sales vary widely, but company is clearly making progress on the tablet front, and is increasing Fire sales at a brisk pace, with some observers suggesting black-and-white reading devices will slowly fade as tables become the go-to device; columnist Alexander Eule says the most important issue is the degree to which Amazon has become a tangled web of information, and that its complex, interwoven set of businesses leave investors in the dark.

Trader: Positive on MOS: Shares of potash producer appear attractively valued, and theres some downside protection in company as a low-cost producer with a strong balance sheet; Positive on VLO, MPC, HFC, WNR: The next two years should be good for oil refiners as production in the U.S. continues to grow, despite some volatility in the market.

Small Caps: Positive on OUTR: Activist investor Jana Partners could be the catalyst that investors have been waiting for, and could push management to boost cash generation and return more capital to shareholders.

Follow-Up: Cautious on GS: Banks recent weakness could spur an activist investor to push to break up the company, with one approach being to spin off of the investment management unit, which could be worth $20B or more based on nearly $1T in assets.

Mutual Funds: Interview with Rajeev Bhaman, Portfolio Manager, Oppenheimer Global (top ten holdings: L.M. Ericsson, Euro Aeronautic Defense & Space Co., GOOG, UBS, BMW Preferred, EBAY, LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, WLP, SAP, DIS); Kevin Starr, Co-Founder, Third Rock Ventures, who with his partners created a new way to finance medical breakthroughs (medical portfolio includes: Blueprint Medicines, Eleven Biotherapeutics, Zafgen, Sage, Jounce Therapeutics, CytomX).

European Trader: Positive on LYG: Bank is well capitalized and domestically focused, and could be past the worst of some of its recent problems, as well as being freed from the state-owned stock overhang that has taken some sparkle out of an otherwise stellar share performance.

Asian Trader: Asia has the fastest-growing air travel market in the world, with growth coming from lesser-known, short-haul, low-cost carriers who are expected to see more growth amid Southeast Asian deregulation (Positive on AirAsia, Cebu Air, Nok Air).

Emerging Markets: Corporate India is on pace to deliver its best quarterly growth in more than a year, but thats unlikely to translate into a broad stock-market rally because local consumption hasnt improved, and much needed structural reforms wont occur until next Mays elections.

Commodities: Cocoa futures are hot, but the market still has room to run. CEO Spotlight: Profile of CBS chief Leslie Moonves, who says Whether you watch your favorite show this week or next week, we will still get the same advertising revenue.

Streetwise: Michael Shaoul of Marketfield Asset Management thinks the S&P 500 has a chance to hit 1,800 before year end, but many observers think a new set of snares awaits the market as we head into the new year.

(Barron's) Budget Battles: Are We Headed for Déjà Vu All Over Again?

Budget Battles: Are We Headed for Déjà Vu All Over Again?

Odds are the current political standoff will continue, maybe until we hit the debt ceiling again. The one hope: pork-barrel spending brings the two sides together.

Democrats and Republicans purportedly learned an invaluable lesson while at one another's throats over the budget and the debt ceiling. So, no more tantrums that take us to the edge of a debt default, right? No more imperious refusals to negotiate with one another, and no more frightening roller-coaster rides for the economy? Well, maybe.

Last week, Republicans and Democrats narrowly avoided a politically induced debt default by rescheduling the day of reckoning until after the New Year's holiday. Rock-ribbed conservatives didn't declare a formal truce, however. So it isn't clear they won't attempt to wage yet another suicidal spending battle beginning on Jan. 15, when a temporary measure funding the government expires, and keep on fighting into late February or early March, when the ceiling on government borrowing is reached again, in hopes that an equally unyielding President Barack Obama will cave in to their demands.

Enlarge Image

Win McNamee/Getty Images Members of the bipartisan budget conference, from left: Sen. Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.); Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.); Sen. Patty Murray (D., Wash.); and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D., Md.). The only way to avoid another pitched battle is if a 29-member bipartisan House and Senate panel can formulate a mutually acceptable budget blueprint by Dec. 13—which, by the way, falls on a Friday.

The odds are against a deal. Although panel quarterbacks Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Budget Committee, and Patty Murray, chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, said last week they are hopeful a compromise can be reached, other members of Congress and aides simultaneously talked down the possibility of a major breakthrough.

THE STICKING POINT IS THAT the Grand Old Party is set on reducing entitlement spending and not raising taxes. Obama, on the other hand, long has insisted that higher taxes on the wealthy be part of the entitlement fix, so the poor and middle class don't bear the full brunt of cutbacks. Means-testing for the programs, often suggested by the GOP, might be a way around the problem.

We've had other debt commissions. Back in 2010, there was the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, co-chaired by Republican Alan Simpson and Democrat Erskine Bowles, which sought to cut the deficit by $4 trillion. Murray co-chaired a bipartisan "supercommittee" in 2011, prompted by a stalemate between Democratic and Republican Congress members. That led to the sequester.

Furthermore, it isn't even clear the same House leadership will be in place when the new budget and borrowing-ceiling deadlines hit. Theoretically, the conservative Tea Party sympathizers could replace House Speaker John Boehner. In the recent can-kicking vote, only 87 GOP House members joined with 198 Democrats to cement a deal, while 144 GOP members opposed it.

Don't panic yet. Political experts believe that while some Tea Party members may attempt to overthrow Boehner next year, they won't have the votes.

Gregg Hartley, vice chairman of Cassidy & Associates, one of the capital's best-known lobbying shops, says that last Wednesday when Boehner decided to throw in the towel and allow the full House to vote to end the crisis, most of the House GOP's conference rose to its feet to applaud him.

WHAT REMAINS TO BE SEEN, says Hartley, is whether that majority going forward will align itself more closely with Boehner and not with the 30 to 40 conservative House members who were the force behind the calamitous government shutdown. If supporters do gel around Boehner, then the Speaker will have more leverage when negotiating with the president, says Hartley. Obama might choose to work with House Republicans if Boehner can deliver the votes to seal a deal.

Most likely, however, Congress, with a few exceptions, will remain in the grip of gridlock.

"The war continues" is the way Hartley describes the immediate future.

In fact, Obama's admonitions aside, Republicans most likely will use next January's budget deadline as an opportunity to push their fiscal agenda without the threat of a government shutdown. Hartley points out that there are Republicans who dislike the Draconian sequester law as much as the Democrats do and want to replace it with more-gradual, targeted budget cuts. Republicans might offer this carrot in return for some sort of fiscal deal.

If the sequester is removed, political pork could emerge as the one nexus of self-interest where the two competing parties meet to bridge their differences. Remember, 2014 is an election year. Every campaigning politician likes to bring home some bacon.

"There's tremendous frustration inside the Congress and inside the business community that we are not doing something about our infrastructure," says Hartley. Key political constituencies like manufacturers, contractors, and unions would benefit from a big spending package.

For Wall Street, talk of building pork bridges is much better than talk of blowing up the economy.

(RTR) Lenovo will face obstacles in any BlackBerry deal

(Reuters) - Chinese computer maker Lenovo, which has signed a non-disclosure deal to examine BlackBerry's books, faces regulatory obstacles if it bids for all of the company and will likely pursue just parts, a source familiar with the matter said on Thursday.

BlackBerry Ltd said in August it was exploring options that could include an outright sale. And the Canadian company, which helped pioneer smartphones, has since been linked with a string of potential buyers from private equity firms to rival technology companies.

Its shares, which rose 4 percent after the Wall Street Journal first reported the interest from Lenovo Group Ltd, ended up less than a percent at $8.20 on the Nasdaq.

Multiple sources close to the matter have told Reuters BlackBerry is in talks with Cisco Systems Inc, Google Inc and Germany's SAP AG among others, about selling all, or parts of itself. The potential buyers have all declined to comment.

None of these technology companies have made a formal bid for BlackBerry yet. However, industry experts believe that, while these players might not be interested in all of BlackBerry, they are keen on at least some pieces that would mesh well with or expand their own businesses.

Two sources said they expect some of these strategic players to be paired in bids for BlackBerry, depending on their level of interest its hardware and network assets.

Such a deal would be an alternative to a preliminary, $9-a- share offer by a group led by BlackBerry's biggest shareholder, Canada's Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd. Earlier this month, co-founders Mike Lazaridis and Douglas Fregin said they were also considering a bid.

TOUGH REGULATORY REVIEW

The sale of BlackBerry, or any of its assets will likely undergo tough regulatory reviews in both Ottawa and Washington.

Most security experts believe BlackBerry's most vital asset, a secure network that handles millions of confidential corporate and government emails every day, is likely to be sold to a North American entity because of the security concerns. Its less contentious handset business, however, could be shopped to an Asian device maker.

Under the Investment Canada Act, the federal government has wide ranging powers to veto any foreign takeover of a Canadian asset or company if it deems such a deal would not bring a "net benefit" to the country, or if it believes a deal might pose a threat to national security.

Last week, Canada blocked an Egyptian telecommunication entrepreneur's bid to acquire the Allstream fiber optic network owned by Manitoba Telecom Services Inc, citing unspecified national security concerns.

Industry Minister James Moore declined comment on the Lenovo interest in BlackBerry.

LENOVO INTEREST

BlackBerry, based in Waterloo, Ontario, virtually invented mobile email with its first pagers, but it has rapidly lost market share to rivals in recent years.

Its latest results highlighted disappointing sales for a new line of devices the company initially saw as its way to win back market share from Apple Inc's iPhone and the numerous devices powered by Google's Android operating system.

And senior Lenovo executives have on more than one occasion expressed an interest in acquiring BlackBerry, or parts of the company, as it would help boost their own smartphone business.

In an interview at the World Economic Forum earlier this year, Lenovo Chief Financial Officer Wong Wai Ming told Bloomberg the company would consider a bid for BlackBerry.

Lenovo downplayed the comments at the time, saying that Wong was speaking broadly about Lenovo's M&A strategy.

A spokesman for Lenovo declined to comment on news of the company's renewed interest. BlackBerry said it is conducting a thorough review of its alternatives and that it does not intend to disclose further developments until it approves a transaction, or otherwise concludes the review.

The Wall Street Journal said Lenovo was looking at a bid for all of BlackBerry, which includes its faltering hardware unit, along with its security-focused service businesses and a string of hard-to value patents.

>>> EDF to ink Hinkley Point deal tomorrow; China and Areva could take 40% stake

EDF to ink Hinkley Point deal tomorrow; China and Areva could take 40% stake

EDF Energy of France is to sign an agreement on the proposed British nuclear facility at Hinkley Point tomorrow, 21 October, The Sunday Telegraph reported. The unsourced report said UK ministers are thought likely to reveal the subsidy deal guaranteeing multi-billion-pound revenues for EDF.

Based on an estimated strike price of GBP 92.50 (EUR 109.27)/MWh over 35 years, EDF could see GBP 83bn guaranteed revenues, according to an analysis carried out by CF Partners for the Telegraph. The report noted that EDF and its partners have yet to finalise Treasury-backed debt for the project and the subsidy deal will first have to secure state-aid approval from the EU.

China General Nuclear Power Corporation and China National Nuclear Corporation are to acquire stakes in Hinkley Point which could amount to as much as 30% of the GBP 14bn project, the report said. It added that the French reactor supplier Areva could acquire 10%.

Source Sunday Telegraph

(Barron's) Return on the Bull : Raking In Returns

Raking In Returns

America's money managers expect stocks to rise 7% from now through the middle of next year. They like Europe, tech shares and real estate, but not bonds. Memo to Ben: It's time to taper.

Whew! It's back to business in Washington after a 16-day government shutdown. And it's back to business on Wall Street—the business of buying stocks, that is.

Markets cheered the news last week that Congress had finally come to its senses, or what passes for the same, in reaching a deal to lift the U.S. debt ceiling and send government workers back to their posts. The Dow rallied 1.4% on Wednesday, and 1% on the week, to 15,399, and the Standard & Poor's 500 rose 2.4%, to a new high of 1744.

America's money managers had a strong hunch things would work out on Capitol Hill, at least for now, and they told us so in their largely upbeat responses to our fall Big Money poll. Sixty-eight percent of participants, representing a cross section of the nation's professional investors, declared themselves bullish or very bullish about the stock market's prospects through the middle of next year, evidence that they see no lasting damage from Washington's latest drama.

"The government shutdown is near-term noise for investors," said Jason Norris, senior vice president of research at Portland, Ore.–based Ferguson Wellman Capital Management, in the days before the deal was announced. "A few months from now, we'll be looking back at what could well be a good buying opportunity. We like that there are a lot of skeptics out there. It means the stock trade isn't crowded."

Enlarge Image

Robert Turner, chairman of Turner Investments in Berwyn, Pa., calls this "the most joyless" bull market in history, given the doubts attendant to every point rise in the Dow. But you won't find much hand-wringing in his office, as he expects strength in corporate fundamentals to persist. "For 18 quarters, earnings have come in above expectations, and that won't change," he notes. "Shares are still reasonably valued. These runs don't end unless excesses are created, and I don't see any excesses."

Healthy corporate balance sheets and a world economy that is slowly healing also are working in stocks' favor, says Stephen Drexler, a managing director of Wells Fargo Advisors in Colorado Springs, Colo. "Slow and steady with little fanfare and still much to worry about isn't a bad backdrop," he says.

YET, EVEN AFTER ADDING up the pluses, the pros have pulled in their horns some since spring. Back then, a record 74% of poll respondents said they were bullish on stocks.

Today's bulls see the U.S. market advancing by only single digits through next June. Based on their consensus estimate, the Dow will rise 7% between now and then, ending this year at about 15,700 and mid-2014 at 16,486. The bulls see the S&P 500 gaining 5%, to 1824, by the middle of next year, and the Nasdaq adding 5%, to 4116, in that span.

The managers' subdued forecasts reflect the fact that 71% of poll participants now regard stocks as fairly valued, compared with 58% in the spring. Only 15% consider the U.S. market undervalued, down from 26% last April.

The S&P 500 is trading for 14 times next year's expected earnings of $122.19, which, from a historical perspective, makes the market neither rich nor cheap. Just over half of the Big Money managers expect the price/earnings multiple to expand in the next 12 months, while 11% see a contraction, and the rest see no change.

"We're unlikely to see the gains in stocks that we've had in the past couple of years, just because valuations are higher," observes Todd P. Lowe, president of Parthenon, a Louisville, Ky., money manager. "Also, the Federal Reserve is going to unwind [its bond-buying program]. We're not optimistic it will be able to do so seamlessly."

John Fox, co-manager of the $900 million FAM Value fund, sees long-term returns "in the high-single/low-double digits over five to 10 years," reinforcing the need for savvy stock-picking. He looks to capture faster growth overseas by investing in U.S. companies with big footprints in Europe and China. Also, he applauds corporations with substantial cash flow that enhance value by buying back shares, paying dividends, and merging.

ACCORDING TO THE Big Money pros, rising corporate profits, stronger economic growth, and better employment news are the three factors that would be most likely to send U.S. stocks sharply higher in the next six months. Better news about China's economy also would reverberate positively here.

The managers finger continued political dysfunction as the most likely rally-killer, followed by earnings disappointments and slowing economic growth. "The rhetoric from both political parties is holding back the recovery," says C.T. Fitzpatrick, founder of Vulcan Value Partners, in Birmingham, Ala.

Hands down, the Big Money managers view the stock market as the best place for your money over the next 12 months—and the next five years. On a near-term basis, 80% expect equities to outperform all else, while 6% are betting on cash, and 6% on real estate.

About half of the managers think the U.S. will be the best-performing market in the next 12 months; 24% say European equities will shine brightest as the Continent emerges from a multiyear slump; and 8% are putting their money on Japan. Many managers expect emerging markets to do best over five years, outperforming the U.S., a reflection of the rapid growth of developing economies.

Enlarge Image

Among stock-market sectors, the managers like technology best, given the industry's strong fundamentals. Thirty-two percent are betting that tech will lead the pack in the year ahead, with 11% backing financials, and 10%, energy stocks.

Norman Conley, chief executive of JAG Capital Management in St. Louis, sees revenue growth as a key to lifting sectors. "There is only so much you can achieve from balance-sheet machinations, and the markets are slowly starting to recognize that," he says.

Conley favors industrial and technology stocks, and prefers biotech stocks to relatively staid large-cap drug and consumer-staples companies.

Utilities get little respect from our crowd. With bond yields edging up, about a third of the Big Money crowd thinks utility shares will be the worst performers in the next 12 months. The managers also worry about the outlook for consumer-cyclical and financial issues.

The managers' big bet on tech is apparent from their favorite stocks, a list topped this fall by Apple (ticker: AAPL), Google (GOOG), and Microsoft (MSFT). Strip out Apple's net cash, notes Fitzpatrick of Vulcan, and the shares, now $508, sell for only seven times expected earnings.

Other favorites include Samsung Electronics (005930.Korea), EMC (EMC), energy-pipeline operator Kinder Morgan (KMI), and CF Industries (CF), a fertilizer producer.

As usual, there is broader agreement on the market's most overvalued issues, with Tesla Motors (TSLA), the electric-car maker, the managers' No. 1 pan. The company is expected to sell only about 20,000 cars this year, but sports a market value of $22 billion, or $1.1 million per vehicle.

Netflix (NFLX), Amazon.com (AMZN), Facebook (FB), and Salesforce.com (CRM) also look too richly priced in the view of survey respondents. And some think the same of, yes, Apple.

THE BIG MONEY POLL is conducted twice yearly, in the spring and fall, with the help of Beta Research in Syosset, N.Y. Our latest survey, mailed in mid-September, just after the Fed's policy makers met, drew responses from 135 institutional investors, representing some of the U.S.' largest asset managers as well as smaller firms.

Just 8% of respondents describe themselves as bearish about the outlook for stocks through next June. Nearly one in four is neutral, up from 19% in the spring. The bears expect the Dow to close the year at about 14,450, and drop to 14,016 by next June. They see the S&P 500 falling to 1609 by year end and 1561 by mid-2014, and the Nasdaq trading at about 3400 in nine months, 13% below its current level.

Most bears say the bull market's fate is tied to future Fed moves to curb quantitative easing, as its bond-buying program is known. The Fed has been purchasing bonds to drive down interest rates and stimulate economic growth.

Jason Brady, manager of the Thornburg Strategic Income fund, says that accommodative central-bank policy has pushed money into risky assets, artificially inflating stock prices. If corporate earnings falter and the Fed starts to taper, the rationale for current prices will be undermined.

Enlarge Image

Brady expects this negative scenario to play out over time; he sees the Dow holding at 15,000 for the remainder of this year before dropping to 14,000 six months hence. "If quantitative easing has been really effective in spurring economic growth, taking it away can only lower growth prospects," he contends.

William Tempel, chief investment officer at Reynolds Capital Management, a family office based in Fort Worth, Texas, argues that price distortions created by two rounds of QE make it difficult for equity investors to determine what true value is. "It is difficult to get a good understanding of what you should be buying when it is financed with 2% money," he avers.

Consequently, Tempel has been investing in start-up businesses, such as a salt-extraction enterprise in the domestic oil- and gas-producing region known as the Bakken shale. Start-ups, he notes, offer opportunities to build value independent of the Fed's moves.

SEVENTY-TWO PERCENT of Big Money managers are bullish on real estate, in part because its returns aren't correlated with financial markets. Thirty-four percent are bullish on commodities, and 29% like gold. The yellow metal rallied 3% on Thursday, to $1,320 an ounce, amid short-covering and expectations that the cost of the government's shutdown would further postpone the Federal Reserve's plans to taper its asset buying. Gold closed the week at $1,316 an ounce.

Largely because of the U.S. central bank's policies, it's hard to rouse a kind word for bonds from the managers. Only 9% are bullish on U.S. Treasuries, though 18% think positively of corporate bonds. Just 4% see any value in bond-related mutual and exchange-traded funds.

Greg Melvin, chief investment officer at Pittsburgh's CS McKee, says that stocks will outperform, even with the market "fairly valued," precisely because of the dismal prospects for bonds. "Our client base of pension funds has no alternative but to put money into stocks to meet their actuarial assumptions," he says. "Rates will go up for the next 30 years, leaving almost zero return for bonds."

What's true of institutions could also pertain to individual investors. Chas Smith, president of CPS Investment Advisors in Lakeland, Fla., expects the rotation into stocks, which began this year, to gather steam as retirees book losses on their fixed-income accounts. "This will cause bond-fund redemptions," he says. "The Fed has manipulated interest rates to artificially low levels. Rates have to rise."

LIKE MOST INVESTORS, the Big Money managers are trying to gauge when the Fed will pull back from the market and let the economy stand on its own. After all, 80% say monetary policy influences their investment decisions significantly or somewhat. Only 4% say it's of no consequence.

Two-thirds of our respondents disagreed with the central bank's decision last month to postpone tapering, although 80% expect the Fed to reduce its bond purchases starting in next year's first half. As one manager said in written comments, "If the economy is improving, the bond-buying program should end. If the economy isn't improving after multiple years of bond-buying, it may be time to try a different strategy."

Another noted that while QE has been beneficial personally, persistently low rates "are destroying savers, senior citizens, and people in the middle and lower classes."

Enlarge Image

Or, as James Spence, co-founder of Spence Asset Management in Las Cruces, N.M., put it, "the Fed assumes there is no cost to using monetary policy to cure problems not caused by monetary policy."

As the Fed pulls away from the market, bond yields are expected to rise. The yield on the 10-year Treasury has already jumped to 2.58% from a low of 1.6% in May, and 3% no longer seems so distant. Indeed, 76 of the Big Money managers expect the 10-year to yield 3% to 3.5% a year from now, while 17% see yields of 4% or more.

For all of the doubts they express about QE and its chief architect, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, the money managers are split in their assessment of the strategy's results. Two-thirds say that quantitative easing has been beneficial to neutral for the U.S. economy, at least until this point, although it could prove harmful if prolonged.

Gross domestic product increased in the second quarter at an annual rate of 2.5%, and a third of the managers look for that pace to be sustained in the next year. Another 21% foresee GDP growth of 3.5% or more.

At these growth rates, inflation doesn't seem a worry, at least to half of the managers in our survey. As for the rest, 36% predict that prices will rise, and 13% aren't sure.

Enlarge Image

Most respondents expect unemployment to stay stuck at about 7% to 7.5% in the next 12 months, but slip to 6%-6.5% the following year—yet another sign of modest progress. The managers also see continued good news for the housing market, which has picked up this year.

The Big Money men and women see little change in oil prices in the year ahead. West Texas crude is trading at $100.81 a barrel, and their mean forecast puts it at $104.37 in 12 months. John White, of Triple Double Advisors in Houston, thinks prices might drop, however, now that Libya is back in the oil market. The growth of domestic shale-oil and gas production underpins his optimism about the U.S. economy and the stock market. "The U.S. is benefiting from cheaper and more abundant natural gas," he says. "This should allow us to build out manufacturing and infrastructure."

MOST OF THE INVESTMENT managers in our survey pay less attention to fiscal than monetary policy, but that doesn't mean they don't keep a close eye on Washington, especially these days. While it's early to be handicapping the 2014 midterm elections, we asked them to do just that.

More than 90% expect the Republicans to retain control of the House of Representatives in the next Congress, and 68% look for the Democrats to keep the keys to the Senate. That suggests more wrangling and less clarity ahead about taxes, government spending, and regulation.

The S&P 500 has rallied 22% this year, with little help from Congress but plenty from the Fed. It has been tough even for professional investors to keep pace. Still, 65% of Big Money managers say they're beating the market this year, and the rest probably are rushing to catch up. That's another reason to think the bulls will stay in the driver's seat for now.

Fed QE Taper Seen Delayed to March as Shutdown Slows Growth

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Fed QE Taper Seen Delayed to March as Shutdown Slows Growth (1) 2013-10-18 20:00:01.85 GMT

(Updates to add total purchases in 10th paragraph.)

By Jeff Kearns, Joshua Zumbrun and Catarina Saraiva Oct. 18 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve will delay the first reduction in its bond purchases until March after the government shutdown slowed fourth-quarter growth and interrupted the flow of data, economists said. Policy makers will pare the monthly pace of asset buying to $70 billion from $85 billion at their March 18-19 meeting, according to the median of 40 responses in a Bloomberg News survey of economists. The 16-day budget impasse in Washington reduced growth by 0.3 percentage point this quarter, economists said in the survey. Forecasters, surprised when the Fed opted against tapering at its Sept. 17-18 meeting, pushed out their expectations after the shutdown furloughed as many as 800,000 federal workers. The closing also disrupted collection and publication of economic reports the Fed says it needs to determine whether the expansion is strong enough to handle less monetary stimulus. “It’s going to be harder to extract the signal from the data, and the Fed’s policies are tied to the data,” said Laura Rosner, a U.S. economist at BNP Paribas SA in New York and a former researcher at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York who expects the first tapering in March. “They’re waiting for more confirmation the economy is moving in the direction of their outlook, and if we don’t have data or it’s inconclusive, then the Fed isn’t going to feel confident enough in the outlook.”

New Chairman

The U.S. central bank will reduce monthly purchases to a $25 billion pace by July and end the program at the October 2014 meeting, according to the survey conducted yesterday and today. Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s second term ends Jan. 31, and President Barack Obama has nominated Vice Chairman Janet Yellen to succeed him. Economists had expected the central bank to reduce purchases to $80 billion last month, according to a Bloomberg survey before the September meeting. “Conditions in the job market today are still far from what all of us would like to see,” Bernanke said at a press conference following last month’s meeting. Economists after that focused on December as the most probable date for the Fed to begin reducing the purchases. Twenty-four of 41 economists in a Sept. 18-19 survey identified the central bank’s December meeting as the time to taper. That was before the government shutdown, which was resolved early yesterday morning when Obama signed legislation opening the government until Jan. 15 and suspending the nation’s debt limit through Feb. 7.

Rising Estimates

Total bond buying is poised to exceed prior estimates as the Fed delays tapering to assess the shutdown. The quantitative easing program once finished would total $1.6 trillion, according to the median estimate of economists. That’s up from a projection of $1.29 trillion prior to the September meeting and $1.47 trillion in the Sept. 18-19 survey. The policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee’s last two meetings this year are scheduled for Oct. 29-30 and Dec. 17-18. “They’re not tapering in October, but they never were,” said Joseph LaVorgna, chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. in New York. “Conceivably, December is still on the table, although it’s possible the integrity of the October data may not be great.”

Commerce, Labor

The shutdown delayed the publication of key economic reports from the Department of Labor and Department of Commerce. It also prevented data collectors at the agency from gathering some of the data at the usual time period. The Labor Department said yesterday the September jobs report will be released Oct. 22, while October’s will be pushed back to Nov. 8 from Nov. 1. The August report showed employers added 169,000 jobs, less than the median forecast of economists. That report also lowered prior estimates for employment growth in June and July. Chicago Fed President Charles Evans, an outspoken advocate of continued stimulus, said the central bank should not begin reducing the pace of asset purchases with unreliable numbers. “Only the data can tell us how much progress we’ve made, and they aren’t saying much right now,” Evans said yesterday in a speech in Madison, Wisconsin. “Data available in September were inconclusive, and since then incoming information has been silenced with the federal government shutdown.”

‘Been Swamped’

Even Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher, who has called for reducing asset purchases, said fiscal discord has undermined the argument for tapering. Talk of cutting bond buying has “all been swamped by fiscal shenanigans,” Fisher told reporters after a speech yesterday in New York. “Across the board -- Fisher to Evans -- they’re saying tapering is further down the road than it might have been if we hadn’t had the shutdown,” said Michael Hanson, senior U.S. economist at Bank of America Corp. in New York and a former Fed economist. If the data are “impaired from the shutdown,” policy makers may wait until January to begin reducing purchases, he said. Hanson forecasts the economy will grow 2 percent in the fourth quarter, a 0.5 percentage point cut from his expectations before the government shutdown began. The world’s largest economy will grow at a 2.4 percent annual pace in the fourth quarter, according to the median estimate of economists in a survey last week.

Potential Postponement

“If the data stay soft, it’s conceivable they won’t be tapering in January,” said Hanson, and the decision could be postponed until March. “It could very well be toward the end of the year,” before the program is finished entirely, he said. The Fed remained open during the government shutdown and conducted its Beige Book business survey, a collection of anecdotal accounts on the economy through Oct. 7. Four Fed districts saw slower growth, while the remaining eight said the expansion held steady amid “uncertainty” from the fiscal deadlock, according to the Oct. 16 report. Growth remained “modest to moderate” as consumer spending maintained gains and business investment grew, the Fed said. Employment growth “remained modest” in September, and price and wage pressures “were again limited.” The Fed is pressing on with its third round of quantitative easing begun in September 2012, and officials pledged to continue buying until achieving “substantial improvement” in the labor market. The purchases have swollen the Fed’s balance sheet to a record $3.81 trillion. Americans in October were the most pessimistic about the nation’s economic prospects in almost two years, as concern mounted that the political gridlock would hurt the expansion, the Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index of expectations shows. “A lot of the impact really depends on the behavior of consumers during that time,” said Drew Matus, an economist at UBS AG in Stamford, Connecticut, and a former markets analyst at the New York Fed, who expects the central bank to begin reducing purchases in January. “The fact that most government workers knew that they were going to get their money is probably one of the reasons if you went golfing in the last couple weeks you probably had trouble getting tee times.”

For Related News and Information: Fed Saw ‘Modest to Moderate’ Growth Amid U.S. Budget Impasse NSN MUS06F0D9L35 <GO> Fed’s Evans Sees QE Tapering Postponed After Data Shutdown NSN MUTQW00D9L35 <GO> Delayed September U.S. Employment Report Coming Out Next Week NSN MUU4901A74E9 <GO> Fed rates, data, news, statements: FED <GO> Fed balance sheet graph: FARBAST INDEX GP W <GO> FX dashboard: XDSH <GO> Treasury curves: GC I25 TODAY 1Y 2Y 5Y 7Y <GO> Global economy watch: GEW <GO>

--With assistance from Kristy Scheuble in Washington. Editors: Brendan Murray, Chris Wellisz

To contact the reporters on this story: Jeff Kearns in Washington at +1-202-624-1806 or jkearns3@bloomberg.net; Joshua Zumbrun in Washington at +1-202-624-1984 or jzumbrun@bloomberg.net; Catarina Saraiva in Washington at +1-202-654-7302 or asaraiva5@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Chris Wellisz at +1-202-624-1862 or cwellisz@bloomberg.net

>>> Weekly Market Update

Weekly Market Update: Stocks Charge Higher After US Debt Stalemate Ends with a Whimper

- The United State Congress managed not to let the country default on its debts this week, passing a bill to reopen the government and to raise the debt ceiling for a few months. After two weeks of a government shutdown, the Congressional bluster quieted and a backroom deal was reached just ahead of the Treasury's October 17th debt ceiling deadline. All in all, the impact of the shutdown is expected to be fleeting, though S&P suggests it cost the United States $24 billion in economic activity, and will shave about 0.6% off of Q4 GDP, not to mention sacrificing a significant but intangible amount of the country's international standing. In response to Washington's brinkmanship, Fitch put its AAA US rating on watch negative and Chinese agency Dagong cut its US rating to A- from A, while investor Warren Buffett labeled the debt limit a "political weapon of mass destruction." The GOP and the Congress garnered record-low approval ratings. Meanwhile earnings season rolled on, with 75% of the S&P500 companies that reported this week meeting or beating consensus expectations. Very weak showings at Goldman Sachs and IBM hampered the DJIA, while the S&P500 closed out the week at new all-time highs and the Nasdaq pushed to within 100 points of the 4000 handle. For the week, the DJIA gained 1%, the S&P500 rose 2.4% and the Nasdaq surged 3.2%.

- Budget negotiations continued all through the weekend in the Senate following two weeks of squabbling in the House. Senators from both sides of the aisle stepped in to help outline a consensus solution, and by Tuesday Majority Leader Reid and Minority Leader McConnell were reassuring the country that they were very close to a deal, which was passed by the Senate (81 to 18, with more than half of GOP members voting yes) and then the House (285 to 144, with 87 Republicans voting yes) on Wednesday. The agreement funds the government through January 15th and extends debt limit through Feb 7th, with the Treasury granted the authority to use extraordinary measures to push the debt limit through March. After the deal, McConnell pledged that he would not allow another shutdown or debt ceiling gambit aimed at defunding Obamacare. The deal also requires the creation of a bipartisan budget panel to facilitate negotiations on a longer-term debt reduction agreement. Senate Budget Committee Chairwoman Patty Murray (D-WA) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) were tapped to lead the budget panel, which has been charged to reach a budget reconciliation by Dec 13 (a Friday). Most Washington insiders now expect that any agreement reached will likely be a modest reallocation of the automatic cuts imposed by the sequester rather than the elusive 'grand bargain.'

- Fed hawks Fisher and George offered contrasting opinions about the potential for tapering QE. Fisher said he does not expect QE bond buying to be reduced at the October FOMC meeting, warning that markets were too delicate at the moment to begin the taper. Fisher also said that personally he would not consider tapering a good idea in October due to the current fiscal standoff. Meanwhile George said the Fed should begin tapering QE now, while also cautioning that the time is not yet right for tightening rate policy.

- There were no surprises in most of China's September economic data, with the exception of trade numbers. Third quarter GDP growth was in line at 7.8%, supported by strong domestic and foreign demand. The GDP data continues to place China on path to achieve the government annual growth forecast of 7.5%, although there are still uncertainties about whether the current recovery is sustainable. September industrial production and retail sales met expectations. The China trade balance fell to a six-month low, with exports negative for the first time in three months. Imports were in line with expectations at +7.4%.

- WTI crude continued its extended its six-week decline, closing out the week just above the $100 handle. In Geneva, the P5+1 group of western powers plus Russia concluded a very positive two-day round of talks with Iran, and agreed to meet again on November 7-8th in order to keep talking. Newly elected Iranian President Rohani continued to make conciliatory statements, and the majors powers were cautiously optimistic about the change in tone, but cautioned that they were a long way from a breakthrough.

- The threat of the Fed taper during the last quarter took a bite out of Goldman Sachs, whose Q3 profits fell 2% and revenues dived 20%. CEO Blankfein said the results reflected "a period of slow client activity." Bank of America posting solid profits although revenue was down slightly y/y and loan growth was nearly flat. Citigroup's North America retail banking revenues fell 35% thanks to a big drop in mortgage origination revenue and fixed income revenue fell 26% y/y. Morgan Stanley reported very strong Q3 results, with earnings and revenue topping expectations on very strong growth in trading revenues at the firm. Note that Morgan Stanley's gains in equity trading revenue more than offset most of the decline in fixed-income, FX and commodity trading, where revenue fell 44%.

- IBM's revenue was severely compromised in certain areas: hardware revenues were down 17% y/y, and revenue in BRICs areas were down 15%, both largely due to slow China hardware sales. Management said execution issues and a pause related to China's government developing a new economic plan due in November caused Chinese hardware sales to plummet 40% in the quarter. Both Google and Yahoo saw double-digit gains in paid clicks, even as revenue per click for both declined. Shares of Google soared above $1,000 as the firm emphasized strong metrics, while Yahoo offered poor Q4 guidance, keeping shares in the red on the week. Intel beat expectations in its Q3, but delayed launching its 14nm 'Broadwell' chip production, hampering the stock.

- Earnings at Johnson & Johnson, Verizon, and American Express were pretty solid. J&J beat estimates and raised its FY13 guidance. Verizon's postpaid phone service and the FiOS internet business continue to see subscriber growth and overall revenue grew modestly. American Express saw strong gains in both US and international card services revenue. All indications are that customers continue to expand card spending at a steady rate.

- The dollar remained weak against the euro even after the end of the debt ceiling standoff. EUR/USD spiked up to the 1.3700 level late in the week, testing the January highs. There was plenty of snarky commentary out of the usual sources questioning the reserve currency status of the dollar, aiding the euro, the dollar's only realistic reserve currency alternative. ECB officials continue to soft-peddle the stability of the euro, however some admit they need to begin factoring in FX issue to the ECB inflation outlook.

>>> US Close Dow+0,18% S&P+0,65% Nasdaq+1,32%

Closing Market Summary: Nasdaq Leads Equities Higher

The S&P 500 registered its third consecutive gain, rising 0.7% to extend its weekly advance to 2.4%. However, the Nasdaq (+1.3%) was today's standout as Google (GOOG 1011.41, +122.61) made a significant contribution to the relative strength of the tech-heavy index. Shares of Google surged 13.8% after the company surpassed earnings expectations by 37 cents.

Thanks to Google's surge, the tech sector settled in the lead with a gain of 1.8%. Even though the sector ended sharply higher, some other top members underperformed. Qualcomm (QCOM 68.40, -0.30) shed 0.4% and IBM (IBM 173.78, -1.05) fell 0.6% after plunging 6.4% yesterday. Chipmakers sat out the rally as Intel (INTC 23.88, -0.05) slipped 0.2% while the broader PHLX Semiconductor added 0.3%. Outside of technology, the industrial sector (+1.1%) was the only group that ended with a gain larger than 1.0%. Top sector component General Electric (GE 25.55, +0.87) jumped 3.5% after beating earnings expectations by a penny on a 1.5% year-over-year decline in revenue. Transports also contributed to the sector's strength as the Dow Jones Transportation Average advanced 1.2%.Kansas City Southern (KSU 117.35, +4.19) was the top index component, rising 3.7% despite reporting a bottom-line miss. Elsewhere, the energy space (+0.9%) outperformed with Schlumberger (SLB 93.99, +2.56) providing a measure of support after beating on earnings. Crude oil ended with a modest gain of 0.2% at $100.84 per barrel.

Also of note, the financial sector (+0.3%) underperformed even as Morgan Stanley (MS 29.69, +0.76) rose 2.6% after beating on earnings and revenue. JPMorgan Chase (JPM 54.30, +0.09) received a late-afternoon boost off its lows amid reports of the bank reaching a $4 billion settlement with the Federal Housing Finance Agency after the FHFA sought as much as $6 billion in damages. Even though financials lagged, the sector was the top performer of the week, rising 5.1%. On the downside, the health care space (-0.4%) ended in the red. Intuitive Surgical (ISRG 376.52, -22.61) weighed following its top-line miss while biotechnology underperformed as well. The iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (IBB 206.78, -1.59) lost 0.8%. Treasuries ended little changed with the 10-yr yield at 2.59%.

Trading volume was aided by options expiration as nearly 900 million shares changed hands on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

September existing home sales will be reported on Monday at 10:00 ET. On the earnings front, McDonald's (MCD 95.20, -0.27), Halliburton (HAL 52.47, +0.75), and SAP (SAP 73.75, +0.86) will report their quarterly results prior to the opening bell.

FT : Slim’s hardline tactics seen in KPN retreat

Slim’s hardline tactics seen in KPN retreat

When Mexican telecoms billionaire Carlos Slim failed to buy part of Telecom Italia in 2007, he told the FT in an interview that overseas expansion was "a question of circumstance. You cannot plan those things." Indeed not. Less than a month ago, he was tentatively pencilling in October to launch his planned América Móvil takeover bid for KPN of the Netherlands. This week, he scrapped it. It was a rare climbdown for the self-made billionaire whose reputation for seldom putting a foot wrong has bestowed on him the aura of a Mexican Midas. The son of Lebanese immigrants, Carlos Slim was already keeping his personal accounts by the age of 12, and investments in banking stocks helped him amass a fortune of 5m pesos ($391,000) by the age of 26, not counting his inheritance. His net worth today is $73bn, according to Forbes. He and Bill Gates vie for the top spot as the richest man on earth, yet Mr Slim is a modest mogul, unwilling to swap the home where he raised six children for an expensive mansion, and, according to biographer José Martínez, wears suits bought from Sears; he owns the Mexican arm of the US department store chain. Mr Slim learned his business smarts from his retailer father, who died when he was 13. Mr Slim senior’s meticulousness once led him to challenge the prices his supplier was charging for safety pins, on the grounds that he had been given a bigger discount the previous year. That kind of hardheadedness was evident in Mr Slim’s decision to walk away from what had become a rollercoaster Dutch adventure after the independent foundation that controls KPN held out for a higher price than he was prepared to pay. The setback, which could yet prove temporary if he decides to return to the table at a later date, reinforces his reputation as a man who sticks to his guns and is proud of never having raised the terms of an offer he has made. Arturo Elías Ayub, his son-in-law, describes Mr Slim as a man who "always sees the good side of things". But it must still have been difficult for him to see the silver lining in the collapse of KPN’s share price from the €8 at which he bought a 30 per cent stake to just over €2 now. Mr Slim is known as a long-term investor, so some in the market expect him to sit tight on his KPN investment for now. Meanwhile, he is free to focus his attention on another of his ambitions – his interest in Telecom Italia’s Brazilian mobile unit, which could soon be put up for sale. Mr Slim’s empire extends far beyond telecoms into banking, tobacco and other businesses, but the day-to-day running of his operations is in the hands of his close-knit family, freeing him up to focus on wider strategy. Mr Slim’s KPN adventure may not have come to much so far, but as many who have dealt with him in the past can attest, it never pays to underestimate Carlos Slim.