Prada’s Unfavorable 4Q Start a Rising Concern, Bocom Says

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Prada’s Unfavorable 4Q Start a Rising Concern, Bocom Says 2013-12-23 01:14:04.738 GMT

By Lisa Pham Dec. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Core European mkt seeing further slowdown in Nov., Dec. to date, analyst Phoebe Wong writes in research note. * Europe, Greater China 3Q sales growth slowed the most * Bocom sees fiscal yr 2014 operating margin flat at 27%; cuts EPS ests. by 8% for fiscal yr 2014, by 9% for fiscal yr 2015 on lower margin, SSS growth assumptions * PT cut to HK$62 from HK$69.60; neutral reiterated * NOTE: Prada said it may fall short of analysts’ ests. for fiscal-year revenue * 22 buys, 11 holds, 2 sells: Bloomberg data * Shrs down 3.3% YTD vs 0.7% rise for Hang Seng Index

For Related News and Information: First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO> First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the reporter on this story: Lisa Pham in Sydney at +61-2-9777-8681 or lpham14@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Shiyin Chen at +852-2977-6909 or schen37@bloomberg.net

(BFW) Tiffany to Pay Swatch Group Damages of CHF402m


 BN 12/22 18:06 *SWATCH COMMENTS IN E-MAIL STATEMENT
 BN 12/22 18:05 *NETHERLANDS ARBITRATION INST. DISMISSES TIFFANY COUNTER-CLAIM
 BN 12/22 18:04 *TIFFANY TO PAY SWATCH GROUP DAMAGES OF CHF402M, NAI SAY

Tiffany to Pay Swatch Group Damages of CHF402m
2013-12-22 18:11:21.364 GMT


By Andrea Snyder
     Dec. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Netherlands Arbitration Institute
passes judgement in the lawsuit Swatch Group vs Tiffany, Swatch
says in e-mailed statement.
  * Tiffany counter-claim dismissed
  * NOTE: Swatch terminated collaboration with Tiffany for
    breach of contract in Sept. 2011, claimed damages in Dec.
    2011
  * NOTE: Tiffany filed counterclaim in March 2012

Link to Company News:{TIF US <Equity> CN <GO>}
Link to Company News:{UHR VX <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>}
First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Andrea Snyder at +1-202-624-1831 or
asnyder5@bloomberg.net

(Barron's) Good Film, Extremely Bad Wolf

Good Film, Extremely Bad Wolf

Martin Scorsese's new movie raises an important question: Will Jordan Belfort ever be forced to repay his victims?

Director Martin Scorsese has spent a sizable chunk of his career exploring the world of gangsters, from Mean Streets to Goodfellas to Casino to Gangs of New York to The Departed. And he has found the perfect man to extend his gangster chronicle in Jordan Belfort, the charismatic penny-stock swindler behind Stratton Oakmont and the central figure in Scorsese's new film, The Wolf of Wall Street. After a sizzling seven-year run, Stratton Oakmont imploded in the 1990s, costing investors more than $300 million.

Relentlessly profane and raucously funny, the characters in The Wolf of Wall Street, starring Leonardo DiCaprio as Belfort, consume drugs in quantities that would stun a charging rhino. And each scene seems to come with its own set of naked women and often public sex acts. It's exhausting, but dazzling.

Based on Belfort's memoir of the same title, the film shows a classic "pump-and-dump" operation, wherein brokers drive up the price of shares, then sell at the top and leave clients holding the bag. DiCaprio's Belfort is briefly portrayed as a straight arrow, until his financial career turns him into an overspending, drug-taking, hooker-hiring, client-bilking sociopath. "Whip their necks off, don't let 'em off the phone" was Belfort's motto, or so one former Stratton broker told a Forbes reporter back in the firm's heyday. That reporter is portrayed in the movie; the editor of her 1991 story is now an editor at Barron's.

As for what drew Scorsese to this material, one factor might be that the most outrageous incidents come straight from Belfort's mouth. Landing a helicopter on his lawn with one eye shut because he was high at the time? True. Persuading a female employee to shave her head by offering to pay for her breast implants? Belfort says he did that. Getting so loaded on maximum-strength Quaaludes that he wrecked his Ferrari without realizing it? That happened, too.

The movie begins with an ad for Stratton Oakmont that blatantly parodies Merrill Lynch's meandering-bull commercials: A male lion roams a trading floor, ready to eat everyone's lunch. After DiCaprio starts his voice-over with a tally of his possessions and drug intake—and that takes a while—there's a flashback to his sober young self being humiliated in his first Street job.

He's ambitious, but the system hasn't shown him yet how to be ruthless. In real life, Belfort was likely not so innocent. Before he sold rancid stocks, he sold meat and seafood, door-to-door, and ended up filing for bankruptcy at age 25 because, he once told a reporter, the margins in that business were too small. After signing on with a series of sleazy penny-stock operators, he started his own firm in a used-car dealership in Queens, N.Y.

IN THE FILM VERSION, Matthew McConaughey, who plays a senior broker at a white-shoe firm, takes Belfort to a fancy restaurant. The broker pounds his chest, advises the youngster to make some good old-fashioned cocaine a part of his daily routine, and tells him their profession is "fugazi"—fake: "Nobody knows if the stock is gonna go up, down, sideways, or in circles," he says.

Then Belfort runs headlong into an irresistible force: Black Monday, Oct. 19, 1987, when the market dropped 23% in a single day. Silence envelops the trading floor at the closing bell; there isn't another still moment in the film until Belfort himself bottoms out.

Having tried things the more-or-less straight way, a jobless Belfort discovers the world of penny stocks, where the broker's cut is 50%, not 1%. He founds what becomes Stratton Oakmont with a bunch of losers. Donnie Azoff, a composite character played by Jonah Hill, sidles up to Belfort at a restaurant and soon becomes his fawning partner. Belfort's actual partner, Daniel Porush, threatened to sue Paramount, the film's producer, if he was depicted in the film.

The firm becomes an amoral, bacchanalian cult. Prostitutes are an everyday presence; Belfort divides them into categories according to price and safe-sex requirements, dubbing the top-of-the-line hookers "blue chips" and the lowest-end ones "pink sheets." The male brokers' toxic attitude toward women is often hard to watch, and the scenes concerning "midget-tossing" contests are excruciating.

Belfort stages a gleefully crooked initial public offering for the shoe maker Steve Madden. He dumps his doe-eyed innocent wife (Cristin Milioti) for model Naomi, played by Australian Margot Robbie with a Brooklyn accent and a welcome amount of self-preserving common sense.

And he attracts the attention of an FBI agent, played by Kyle Chandler. Belfort stashes his dough in Switzerland, and that's where his unraveling begins.

The movie buys into Belfort's self-aggrandizing view of his Wall Street status, with DiCaprio even telling his acolytes they're going after "the wealthiest 1%." Moviegoers who buy that plotline, however, are purchasing another Belfort bill of goods.

In reality, the victims were more like John Kilroy, a Pizza Hut franchisee in Maineville, Ohio. Kilroy, who lost an "upsetting" amount of money in Stratton Oakmont's crooked stocks, says he received only token restitution from the roughly $11 million seized from Belfort and Porush.

After pleading guilty to fraud and money laundering in 1999, Belfort was ordered to make restitution of $110.4 million—plus interest. (Porush was ordered to pay more than $200 million.) Indeed, the judgment required Belfort to pay half of his earnings into a restitution fund, which, prosecutors say, he hasn't done.

In addition to $10.4 million in assets that were seized from him personally, Belfort has coughed up only $1.2 million so far—and most of that involuntarily. For example, he forked over $702,000 in royalties from his two memoirs only after a restraining notice was served on his agent, according to prosecutors. The Wolf of Wall Street was followed by Catching the Wolf of Wall Street, in which he revels in ratting out his former friends in return for a reduction in prison time.

Having served 28 months of a 42-month sentence, Belfort now claims he is reformed. He says he has made repeated offers over the past two years to turn over the money he received for the movie rights to the government. But prosecutors say he paid only $21,000 in restitution in 2011, the same year he signed the $1.045 million movie deal and reported the receipt of $940,500.

Belfort didn't respond to Barron's requests for comment. His attorney, Nick De Feis, at the New York firm De Feis O'Connell & Rose, says: "The parties continue to be in discussion about the restitution obligation."

FOURTEEN YEARS AFTER his guilty plea, Belfort is basking in his renewed infamy. He lives in a mini-mansion overlooking the ocean in Manhattan Beach, Calif., drives a Mercedes SL, and earns five-figure sums for his motivational speeches, according to a recent magazine article. Given that, you'd think he could have done a little bit better by his victims—and that the U.S. Attorney for New York's Eastern District, Loretta Lynch, could have pursued him more vigorously. The U.S. Attorney's office had no comment.

Scorsese, however, is not a prosecutor, and he's using Belfort to riff on a theme that runs through many of his movies. He is the great American bard of addiction—to violence as well as drugs. In The Wolf of Wall Street, which is scheduled to open on Christmas Day, sex takes the place of violence, and the drug consumption may be the greatest in the history of American movies. You can follow the plot, or you can measure the coke. You'll never be able to do both. But sex and drugs are just the trappings.

The movie's addiction narrative is about money, and how it turns a middle-class kid into, well, Jordan Belfort. Money is a drug that corrupts and rushes in to fill a moral void. And while DiCaprio owns this movie—there's scarcely a shot that doesn't include either his face or his voice—most of the other characters are equally contemptible. It's showcase Scorsese, the most sardonic entry yet in his cinematic rogues' gallery.

In the film's closing scene, the real Belfort, looking smugger and sleazier than even DiCaprio's masterful skills can capture, introduces the taller, handsomer film version of himself to a credulous audience that has paid to attend his get-rich-quick seminar.

In a recent letter to the court, Belfort's fiancée, Anne Koppe, argues that her husband-to-be is being persecuted by the government, that "he is an exemplary contributor to the economy," and that "[o]ur business and our family rely on his reputation of being an honest and honorable man."

Even DiCaprio might have been taken in. In a promotional video for Belfort's motivational-speaking business, the actor says, "Jordan stands as a shining example of the transformative qualities of ambition and hard work."

Victims like John Kilroy, who are still waiting for a second round of restitution money, are less convinced of Belfort's redemption. "Hopefully, he'll make a few more movies, and I'll get a check every year," he says, "but I'm not going to hold my breath."

FT : France claims breakthrough with artificial human heart

France claims breakthrough with artificial human heart

France has claimed a breakthrough in human organ technology with the first implant of an artificial heart designed to replace the need for a transplant from another person.
President François Hollande, anxious to lift a mood of pessimism over the country’s economy, hailed the event as an example of French innovation.

“France can be proud of this exceptional deed in the service of human progress,” Mr Hollande wrote in a letter to Alain Carpentier, the veteran inventor of the artificial heart, and the medical team that carried out the operation.
The device, which autonomously mimics the action of a real heart, was implanted in an anonymous 75-year-old man with terminal heart disease on December 18 at the Georges Pompidou European hospital in Paris. He was said by the hospital at the weekend to be awake and talking, making jokes with his family and doctors.
The operation represents a critical moment for Carmat, the quoted company founded by Prof Carpentier and his industrial backers in the 1990s to develop the artificial organ. The implant was confirmed in a statement by Carmat after the market closed on Friday.
Prof Carpentier, 80, was a pioneer of replacement heart valves using animal tissue and combined with aeronautic engineers from what was to become EADS, the aerospace company, to develop the prosthetic heart. EADS continues to hold a 33 per cent stake in Carmat, which was listed on the Paris bourse in 2010.
Unlike other artificial hearts, which act as a temporary bridge for patients until a compatible human heart is available for transplant, the battery-powered Carmat heart is intended to be a permanent replacement for a diseased heart, extending life for five years.
Prof Carpentier said patients would experience some constraints from the need to maintain its electricity supply. But he said the prosthetic heart, using biological and synthetic materials, was designed to avoid the problems of rejection that confront heart transplants and would require little or no use of anticoagulants.
“It is about giving patients a normal social life with the least dependence on medication,” he said.
The professor said in an interview with the Sunday newspaper Journal du Dimanche that the heart incorporated an algorithm that allowed it to “reproduce exactly the contractions of a real heart”.
“If you see your lover walk through the door, your Carmat heart will beat faster just like a real one,” he said.
The medical team said the first month would be critical in assessing the performance of the implant, which has been fitted to 30 cows. It has been subjected to tests based on aircraft proving technologies that Carmat said assured “similar reliability to an aeroplane on its maiden flight”.
Several implants were likely in the next few weeks, the company said. Permission has also been given for the procedure in Belgium, Poland, Slovenia and Saudi Arabia. Carmat estimates a potential worldwide market of €20bn for its device, based on 125,000 patients seeking transplants annually.
However, the heart still requires development, not least to make it smaller. The current model weighs 900 grammes, three times the weight of a male human heart. It is therefore only suitable for about 75 per cent of male patients and 20 per cent of women.

FT : Mikhail Khodorkovsky vows not to seek power in Russia

Mikhail Khodorkovsky vows not to seek power in Russia

Mikhail Khodorkovsky passes by photographers as he arrives at the Wall Museum in Berlin on December 22, 2013©AFP
Mikhail Khodorkovsky, formerly Russia’s most famous prisoner, said on Sunday he would not return to Russia unless an outstanding legal case against him was resolved, and did not plan to get involved in politics.
Speaking to the Financial Times and a small group of international journalists at Berlin’s Checkpoint Charlie Museum, yards from where the Berlin Wall once divided the city, Mr Khodorkovsky added that he would not fund Russian opposition parties.

“I understand better than our opposition how dangerous this would be for them,” he said in his first public appearance since his release.
Looking surprisingly fit and relaxed in a navy blue suit, white shirt and navy blue tie, Russia’s one-time richest man said he was not prepared to thank President Vladimir Putin for the pardon that led to his release on Friday.
“It is very difficult for me to say that I am grateful to him. I thought a long time about what I might say. I am glad about the decision, that’s the most accurate thing I can say,” said the former oligarch.
Mr Khodorkovsky was once said to be worth $15bn before he was arrested in 2003 on fraud and tax evasion charges, after he became too big a challenge to Mr Putin’s authority.
He was spirited out of Russia on Friday, barely 24 hours after Mr Putin revealed Mr Khodorkovsky had requested a pardon and that he was prepared to grant it.
The former tycoon was freed from a prison camp in Karelia, near the Finnish border, on Friday morning and flew to freedom in Berlin on a corporate jet provided by a German company. He was reunited with his family, including his parents and eldest son, Pavel, in Berlin on Saturday.
Responding to a question from the FT, Mr Khodorkovsky said he had not previously sought a pardon as he had always been told he would have to admit his guilt. “For me, this was totally unacceptable, for quite understandable reasons.”
He added that any admission of his guilt would have had implications for other imprisoned former executives of his Yukos oil company.
But the former oligarch said he had recently received a message from Hans-Dietrich Genscher, the former German foreign minister, who had lobbied Mr Putin for his release. Mr Genscher told him the Russian president might be prepared to pardon him and the “question of admission of guilt was not posed”.
“I received a proposal from Mr Genscher in which it was said, if this plan suits you, I suggest you write to the president,” Mr Khodorkovsky said. He added that family circumstances had also played a part in his decision, as his mother is ill.
Mr Khodorkovsky said he would not return to Russia for the time being, because he was still facing a $500m legal claim connected to his first conviction, which could be used to prevent him from leaving the country again. He said he would return only if and when the issue was resolved by Russia’s supreme court.
“Not to have the possibility to leave Russia is something I simply can’t accept,” he said.
He said he would not get involved in politics “in the sense of fighting for power”, but would be involved in “civic activities” and fighting for the release of “political prisoners”. Those included former Yukos colleagues, and opposition protesters arrested at a Moscow demonstration last year.
The former Yukos chief executive said he believed the need for Russia to improve its deteriorating international image had been a factor in Mr Putin’s decision to free him.
“It’s a symbol that Putin is seriously concerned about the image of Russia as a democratic state,” he said. “If you can’t advance an attractive image of your country, that really prevents you from resolving many significant questions in the international arena, even if you have lots of money. You can’t resolve everything through money.”
Mr Khodorkovsky said the most difficult thing in his 10 years in jail had been separation from his family.
“I had only four years in this time when I had the opportunity, once every three months, to have three days to see my family,” he said.
The former tycoon added that he did not plan to take legal action to try to recover Yukos assets. The company was seized after his conviction and sold off, largely to state-controlled Rosneft, to pay off billions of dollars of alleged tax arrears.
“Other shareholders are doing it, but I won’t participate, partly because I don’t want to spend time on this,” Mr Khodorkovsky said.
The former tycoon later appeared at a press conference in front of hundreds of waiting journalists and television cameras, before being driven away with family members.

(ZH) The Last 3 Times This Happened, Markets Turmoiled

The Last 3 Times This Happened, Markets Turmoiled

Thanks to Bob "I don't get out of bed unless it's over 20" Pisani's daily diatribes about VIX (the so-called 'fear' index), we are supposed to rest assured that all is well in the ever-decreasing horizon world of equity markets. However, while VIX measures the expectations of 'normal' day to day moves in stocks, it does not offer any insight into market participants' perspectives on tail risks (or 'the big one'). CBOE's SKEW index does just that, based on the pricing differences between normal and fat-tail risk pricing in the options market, it provides a measure of the market's belief in extreme events... and for only the 4th time in history, it's flashing a big red warning signal of volatility ahead.

The last 3 times this happened... markets went a little crazy...

In 24 years of history, SKEW has been above 140 only 4 times (including the current)... the last 3 times were...

06/21/1990 - S&L Crisis (Stocks dropped 18% in next 3 months and the US entered recession)
10/16/1998 - Russian Default and LTCM (Stocks soared 22% in the next 3 months and the dot-com bubble was born)
03/16/2006 - Housing Bubble peak (Stock dropped 6% in next 3 months and the 'great recession' started within a year)
And now?

12/20/2013... Taper...

(BFW) Abengoa to Meet 2013 Business Targets, CEO Sanchez Tells El Pais


Abengoa to Meet 2013 Business Targets, CEO Sanchez Tells El Pais
2013-12-22 13:19:26.527 GMT


By Esteban Duarte
     Dec. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Rev. to be EU7.25b-EU7.35b, CEO
Manuel Sanchez tells El Pais.
     Sanchez also tells newspaper:
  * Net debt/ebitda to be at 3x in 2013, and ~2.5x or less from
    2014
  * Abengoa to sell about EU1b in 2014, after EU2b of assets
    sold in 2013
  * Co.’s capex to be at EU450 per years from 2014


Link to Company News:ABG SM <Equity> CN <GO>

For Related News and Information:
First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO>
First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

To contact the editor responsible for this story:
Esteban Duarte at +34-91-700-9606 or
eduarterubia@bloomberg.net

>>> Lafuma shareholders approve capital increase and public offer by Calida

Lafuma shareholders approve capital increase and public offer by Calida
The shareholders of French sports clothing group Lafuma have approved the public offer made by the Swiss group Calida, French daily le Figaro wrote, without citing sources.

The report said Calida will acquire 50.85% of the capital and voting rights at Lafuma. This includes a EUR 35m capital increase at Lafuma by Calida, the report noted.

An earlier press release announcing the public offer said execution of the takeover offer is conditional, among others, on LAFUMA shareholders approving the capital increase reserved for CALIDA, which they will vote on at an EGM on 20 December 2013.


Source Le Figaro

>>> Chrysler: Fiat restarts negotiations with Veba to acquire 41.5%

Chrysler: Fiat restarts negotiations with Veba to acquire 41.5%
Fiat, the listed Italian carmaker, has re-opened negotiations with Veba, the medical and pension fund, to acquire its 41.5% stake in the Michigan-based car maker Chrysler, a newswire reported.

The item carried by Bloomberg on 20 December cited three sources with knowledge of the situation who said Fiat/Chrysler's CEO Sergio Marchionne met with Veba representatives, earlier during the week.

The report said earlier in December, Veba had turned down an improved offer for the stake from Fiat. The item said Fiat may improve its offer to ward off Chrysler's IPO being pushed for by Veba.

The report cited one of the sources who claimed Fiat was now offering USD 4.2bn but Veba was asking for at least USD 5bn.


Source Newswire Round-up

Edgar M Bronfman dies at 84

Edgar M. Bronfman, the billionaire businessman and philanthropist who as chairman of the Seagram Company expanded his family’s liquor-based empire and who as president of the World Jewish Congress championed the rights of Jews everywhere, died on Saturday at his home in Manhattan. He was 84. His death, of natural causes, was confirmed by the family’s Samuel Bronfman Foundation. Mr. Bronfman inherited control of Seagram from his father, Samuel Bronfman, an irascible, self-made Canadian magnate who founded a distilling company in 1924 and got rich during Prohibition when Bronfman liquor found its way to American customers through bootleggers. Edgar gave the company a more sophisticated image, in keeping with his own elegantly turned-out profile in New York society — a prominence underscored in the 1970s by the headlines generated by the kidnapping of his son Sam for ransom money. But as liquor profits began to falter, he broadened the company by acquiring Tropicana, taking Seagram into the oil business and eventually making it the largest minority shareholder in DuPont, the chemical giant. Later, he allowed his son Edgar Jr., who had succeeded him as head of the company, to risk billions of dollars to transform Seagram once again, this time into a major player in Hollywood. As president of the World Jewish Congress, from 1981 until 2007, Mr. Bronfman turned a loose, cautious federation of Jewish groups in 66 countries into a more focused, confrontational organization. Under his leadership, the Congress pressed the Soviet Union to improve conditions for Jews living within its borders and to allow freer emigration. Spurred by Mr. Bronfman, the Congress led efforts to expose the hidden Nazi past of Kurt Waldheim, the former secretary general of the United Nations who became president of Austria. And it campaigned successfully to force Swiss banks to make restitutions of more than a billion dollars to the relatives of German death camp victims who deposited their savings in Switzerland before World War II. Mr. Bronfman shrugged off criticism from those who feared that his aggressive tactics were risking an anti-Semitic backlash. “The answer isn’t to say, ‘Don’t make trouble,’ and hide our heads in the sand,” he wrote in his 1998 memoir, “Good Spirits: The Making of a Businessman.” “We may not earn the friendship of others, but we will demand their respect.” Edgar Miles Bronfman was born in Montreal on June 20, 1929. His father and his mother, the former Saidye Rosner, were Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe who had moved to Montreal from Winnipeg, Manitoba. Edgar was the third-born of their four children. Sam Bronfman and his brother Allan established a successful mail-order liquor company but were forced to give it up when provincial governments in Canada took over the retail side of the liquor business themselves. The Bronfmans decided that if they could not sell liquor, they would produce it. The family built its own distillery near Montreal in 1925. It prospered, and the Bronfmans took advantage of Prohibition by opening more distilleries just across the border from the United States. One that the brothers bought was owned by the Seagram family, and they incorporated the name. When Prohibition ended, they were strategically placed to open a Seagram subsidiary in the United States, in 1933. “How much business Father and his brothers did with bootleggers was never clear,” Mr. Bronfman wrote in “Good Spirits.” Edgar and his siblings grew up in aristocratic splendor. Their family’s suburban Montreal mansion was staffed with a butler, a cook, maids, nannies, gardeners and chauffeurs. They spent summers at their country estate in Tarrytown, N.Y., and at the family retreat on Lake Placid in the Adirondacks. But affluence did not always evoke fond memories. “My childhood was marked by a tension between privilege on the one hand and emotional dysfunction on the other,” Mr. Bronfman wrote in “Good Spirits.” He complained that his father had rarely been around and that his mother had been remote and inaccessible. Mr. Bronfman said he had grown up with a confused understanding of his Jewish identity. The Bronfmans kept a kosher home, and the children received religious schooling on weekends. But during the week Edgar and his younger brother, Charles, were among a handful of Jews sent to private Anglophile schools, where they attended chapel and ate pork. “No one said anything to my face,” Mr. Bronfman remembered, “but I constantly heard comments denigrating Jews.” Mr. Bronfman enrolled at Williams College in Massachusetts and then transferred to McGill University in Montreal, graduating in 1951. At 21 he joined Seagram, working as an apprentice taster and accounting clerk in Montreal and then at the main distillery nearby, where he eventually oversaw production. He had a knack for finances and the boldness to tell his tyrannical father how best to handle his money. At 22 he explained that Seagram could reap great tax benefits if it incorporated its petroleum subsidiary and carried out exploration in the United States rather than in Canada. “Fortunately, Father saw the point at once and agreed,” he wrote. Mr. Bronfman was a confident executive, safe in the knowledge that as the firstborn son he was the heir apparent. His brother accepted his status and throughout his life deferred to Mr. Bronfman on business decisions. But his oldest sibling, Minda, resented the accident of gender that had removed her from consideration as the eventual heir, despite her degree in business administration. Relations between her and Edgar were strained for most of their lives. In 1953 Mr. Bronfman married Ann Loeb, a granddaughter of the financier Carl M. Loeb. Loeb, Rhoades & Company helped the Bronfmans purchase the Texas Pacific Coal and Oil Company. Mr. Bronfman convinced his father that since the United States accounted for 90 percent of Seagram revenues, it made sense to install himself permanently in New York. In 1953 Samuel Bronfman put Edgar in control of the company’s subsidiary in the United States, Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, and placed Charles in charge of the Canadian branch, the House of Seagram. Mr. Bronfman moved to New York two years later and shortly afterward became an American citizen — although it was his sister Phyllis, who had studied architecture, who was put in charge of the construction of the new company headquarters, the Seagram Building, on Park Avenue, considered a jewel of modern skyscraper design. At its zenith, in 1956, Seagram’s products accounted for one of every three distilled-alcohol drinks in the United States. Then its market share began to slide. To compensate for the losses, Mr. Bronfman squeezed more profits from less production, using modern cost-cutting methods and focusing on more expensive brands of whiskey. But he was frustrated by his inability to wrest full control of Seagram from his aging father, and he began to dabble in film and television production. After losing a bid for MGM to the financier Kirk Kerkorian, however, he returned full time to the beverage business. With the death of his father in 1971, Mr. Bronfman’s personal life began to unravel. That same year he separated from his wife, with whom he had five children. After their divorce, he married Lady Carolyn Townshend, in 1973, but that marriage also ended in divorce, a year later. He quickly became involved with another Englishwoman, Rita Webb (who changed her name to Georgiana). They married and divorced each other twice, and had two daughters. He then married Jan Aronson, an artist and a former triathlete. He is survived by Ms. Aronson; his sons, Samuel, Edgar Jr., Matthew and Adam, and his daughter Holly Bronfman Lev, all from his first marriage; his daughters with Ms. Webb, Sara Igtet and Clare Bronfman; his brother, Charles; his sister Phyllis Lambert; 24 grandchildren; and two great-grandchildren. In 1975, Samuel Bronfman II was kidnapped in New York and held for ransom. Mr. Bronfman himself delivered the $2.4 million ransom to one of his son’s two kidnappers, who were both arrested shortly afterward by the F.B.I. But the kidnappers’ lawyer claimed in court that the abduction had been a hoax and that Sam Bronfman had been a part of it. In the end, the jury convicted the defendants of the lesser charge of extortion. With liquor consumption in decline in 1981, Mr. Bronfman tried to buy Conoco, a major oil and gas company. Seagram lost out to DuPont in the bidding but, because of its investment in Conoco, ended up with a 20 percent share of DuPont — and soon raised this to almost 25 percent, making Seagram DuPont’s largest minority shareholder. Initially, most Wall Street analysts and the financial press took the position that Seagram had been outdueled for Conoco by DuPont. A 1981 Business Week article quoted a DuPont senior executive as saying jokingly that he enjoyed drinking “Seagram on the rocks.” But by 1985 its stake in DuPont accounted for nearly 75 percent of Seagram’s earnings, and Mr. Bronfman was being hailed as a smart, risk-taking businessman. At the same time, Mr. Bronfman was becoming increasingly involved in Jewish causes. He was elected president of the World Jewish Congress in 1981. “Making money is marvelous, and I love doing it, and I do it reasonably well,” he told The New York Times in 1986, “but it doesn’t have the gripping vitality that you have when you deal with the happiness of human life and with human deprivation.” As his devotion to Jewish causes grew, he reduced his involvement with Seagram and prepared to turn over the company to the next generation. By family tradition his oldest son, Sam, was the logical successor, but he favored his second son, Edgar Jr., and without consulting either, Mr. Bronfman announced his choice in a 1986 interview with Fortune magazine. It would be Edgar Jr. “It took Sam a long time to get over the hurt that I had inflicted,” Mr. Bronfman later conceded. “But my responsibility was to choose the right C.E.O. for Seagram regardless of presumed birthright or familial relationship.” Edgar Bronfman Jr. became president of Seagram in 1989 and chief executive in 1994. With his father’s approval, he sold Seagram’s shares in DuPont and used the proceeds, more than $9 billion, to purchase MCA, a major Hollywood film and music company, which was later split into Universal Studios and Universal Music. DuPont’s share price doubled within four years, while Seagram’s stock barely budged during the long bull market of the 1990s. Undeterred, Edgar Jr. spent billions more on entertainment. In 1998 he bought PolyGram, the giant music company, but the resulting conglomerate floundered, forcing him to seek a strategic partner. So in 2000 he negotiated yet another controversial deal, an all-stock acquisition of the French conglomerate Vivendi. He briefly became chief executive of the new company, Vivendi Universal, but after Seagram lost control of its entertainment holdings, he stepped down from an executive capacity in 2001. Seagram then sold its beverage business. In 2004, Edgar Jr. acquired Warner Music Group. Edgar Sr., for his part, became a major philanthropist through the family foundation, with a focus on Jewish educational and social programs in the United States and Israel. At New York University, he helped establish the Edgar M. Bronfman Center for Jewish Student Life. In 1999, President Bill Clinton presented him with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. He also wrote four autobiographical books. His work with the World Jewish Congress also accelerated. In the 1990s the Congress, spurred by Mr. Bronfman, negotiated with Eastern European countries to recover — or at least receive compensation for — the property of Jews that had been seized first by the Nazis and then by the Communists. In the late ’90s, the Congress became one of the foremost critics of Switzerland’s role during World War II, accusing Swiss banks of having stolen the deposits of European Jews who died during the war. After several years of bitter negotiations, Swiss banks agreed in 1999 to distribute at least $1.25 billion in compensation to relatives of European Jews who had secretly deposited their money in Switzerland before perishing at the Nazis’ hands. Mr. Bronfman acknowledged that he could be abrasive in pursuing Jewish causes, but he defended his approach, telling The Times in 1986, “I would like every Jew to be as comfortable in his skin as I am in mine.”