>>> US Early premarket gappers

Early premarket gappers
Gapping up: LEDS +12.5%, SIRI +7.8%, SOL +6.9%, FNF +6.6%, SCTY +5.6%, JKS +4.5%, TSL +4.2%, TWC +3.8%, PLUG +3.8%, YGE +3.6%, GLPI +3.5%, PACR +3.2%, QIHU +2.8%, RMBS +2.7%, YONG +2%, BA +1.5%, DDD +1.3%, BAC +1.2%, CTIC +0.9%, DAL +0.9%, ABX +0.8%, TCS +0.6%

Gapping down: CAMT -3.1%, FSLR -2.7%, ONVO -1.8%, RIO -1.7%, CELG -1.4%, UNXL -1.3%, RDS.A -0.7%, BBL -0.6%

(BFW) T-Mobile to Buy 700 Mhz A-Block Spectrum Licenses for $2.365b

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

BUS 01/06 12:00 T-Mobile to Acquire 700 MHz A-Block Spectrum from Verizon Wireless, Significant Step in Rapidly Advancing Un-carrier Network BN 01/06 12:05 *T-MOBILE BUYS SPECTRUM FROM VERIZON WIRELESS FOR $2.4 BLN CASH BN 01/06 12:02 *T-MOBILE,VERIZON WIRELESS TO REALIGN PRIMARLY N. CAL, ATLANTA BN 01/06 12:01 *T-MOBILE,VERIZON WIRELESS TO REALIGN SPECTRUM BLOCKS SOME MKTS BFW 01/06 12:01 *T-MOBILE TO BUY SPECTRUM FROM VERIZON WIRELESS FOR ABOUT $950M BFW 01/06 12:00 *T-MOBILE TO BUY SPECTRUM FROM VERIZON FOR VALUE ABOUT $950M BN 01/06 12:00 *T-MOBILE TO BUY 700 MHZ A-BLOCK SPECTRUM LICENSES FOR $2.365B BN 01/06 12:00 *T-MOBILE TO BUY SPECTRUM FOR VALUE ABOUT $950M BN 01/06 12:00 *T-MOBILE TO BUY 700 MHZ A-BLOCK SPECTRUM FROM VERIZON WIRELESS,

+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

T-Mobile to Buy 700 Mhz A-Block Spectrum Licenses for $2.365b 2014-01-06 12:05:33.191 GMT

By Andrew Cinko Jan. 6 (Bloomberg) -- T-Mobile buying from Verizon Wireless certain 700 MHz A-Block spectrum licenses $2.365b in cash and transfer of certain AWS and PCS spectrum licenses, worth ~$950m. * Deal, along with existing A-Block holdings in Boston, to give TMUS low-band spectrum in 9 of the top 10 and 21 of the top 30 markets in U.S. * Conf call 11am 800-432-9830, PW 1719015; slides to be posted about deal at 7am on website Link to Statement:{NSN MYZAO0MEQTY0 <GO>} Link to Company News:{VZ US <Equity> CN <GO>} Link to Company News:{TMUS US <Equity> CN <GO>}

For Related News and Information: First Word scrolling panel: {FIRST<GO>} First Word newswire: {NH BFW<GO>}

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Andrew Cinko at +1-609-279-4533 or cinko@bloomberg.net

>>> Nestle : Connecticut private equity firm buys Haverhill pasta company

Connecticut private equity firm Brynwood Partners has acquired Joseph’s Pasta Co., the 23-year old Haverhill company that makes frozen pasta and sauces.

Brynwood Partners of Greenwich, Conn., through an investment fund purchased Joseph’s from Nestlé Prepared Foods Co., which has owned the pasta company since 2006. The financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

“We’re really excited to have acquired the Joseph’s business and we look forward to investing in the company and putting it on a growth track,” said Henk Hartong, senior managing partner at Brynwood Partners.

Joseph’s makes more than 300 varieties of frozen pastas and sauces, which it predominantly sells at wholesale to restaurants. The company employs more than 300 workers at a 150,000-square-foot manufacturing plant in Haverhill.

FT : China draws up new rules to curb shadow banking risks

China draws up new rules to curb shadow banking risks

Chinese one-hundred yuan banknotes are arranged in a bowl for a photograph in Hong Kong, China, Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2013. The yuan rose to the strongest level in 20 years today on signs the Communist Party is already delivering on its November pledge to give markets a more “decisive” role in the world’s second-largest economy©Bloomberg
China has drawn up new rules aimed at containing risks in its burgeoning shadow finance sector while enshrining non-bank institutions as a pillar of its economy.
The draft regulations, a copy of which was obtained by the Financial Times, mark an attempt by the government to better co-ordinate regulation of the country’s shadow banks, but also indicate a more permissive official stance than many observers had anticipated.
China’s financial system was long dominated by banks, which traditionally accounted for more than 90 per cent of all funding in the economy. But over the past five years the rise of non-bank institutions, especially trust companies, has changed the complexion of Chinese finance, with banks now providing roughly half of all new funding in the economy.
The boom in shadow banking has been seen by critics as a major risk, helping fuel a surge in Chinese debt levels and making credit flows less transparent. However, proponents have countered that shadow banks represent a shift to a more diversified, market-led financial system.
The new rules – which were first reported by China Business News, a local newspaper, and have not yet been publicly released – take a middle ground between those views. While demanding enhanced supervision, the regulations say shadow banking has also benefited the economy.
“The emergence of shadow banks is an inevitable result of financial development and innovation. As a complement to the traditional banking system, shadow banks play a positive role in serving the real economy and enriching investment channels for ordinary citizens,” the document said.
Regulators around the world have stepped up their oversight of non-bank institutions since the global financial crisis, recognising that entities from money market funds to private equity firms can have significant impacts on economic stability. From an international standpoint, non-bank “shadow” financing in China is still relatively small but it has been growing by as much as 50 per cent a year.
Officially titled “A notice about some issues related to strengthening shadow banking regulation”, the new Chinese draft rules run to just seven pages.
Issued by the State Council, or cabinet, the rules are known as “Document no. 107”. The next step will be for regulatory agencies to draw up more detailed implementation guidelines.
Both Haitong Securities and China Securities, two major domestic brokerages, said the draft rules would limit off-balance sheet lending by banks and place non-bank institutions under closer scrutiny.
Yet analysts said the proposed new rules were not as harsh as the “Document no. 9” drafted last year by the Chinese banking regulator to limit interbank lending.
“Depending on detailed ministry-level documents, I don’t think it will be tougher,” a banking analyst said. “Most of the principles being emphasised are not new.”
Document no. 107 constitutes China’s first overarching regulatory framework for shadow banking and tries to define the slippery term, which has been used to refer to everything from illegal underground banks to corporate bonds.
The document identifies three kinds of shadow banks and vows to monitor their development more closely.
First, there are those with no operating licences, such as internet finance companies, that are subject to no regulations. The second group are those that do not hold licences and are only partly regulated, such as credit-guaranteed companies. The final batch are those that have licences but face inadequate regulation such as money-market funds.
“At present, our country’s shadow banking risks are under control overall,” the document stated. “But as the 2008 global financial crisis demonstrated, shadow banking risks are complex and hidden, and vulnerabilities can emerge suddenly and spread easily causing systemic problems.”
Although issued by the State Council, Document no. 107 is believed to have been drafted jointly by the central bank and the banking, securities and insurance regulatory commissions, a sign of the government’s desire to develop a more co-ordinated approach to financial regulation.

FT Europe set to ease reform on bank splits

Europe set to ease reform on bank splits

The proposals stem from the 2012 Liikanen report and are the culmination of reforms begun after the financial crisis of 2008
Brussels is set to ease financial reforms so that big European banks are not forced automatically to split lending operations from risky trading.
In a draft European Commission proposal, seen by the Financial Times, the separation is no longer mandatory, would be less costly and restrictive than first envisaged and national supervisors are given wide discretion in applying the reforms.
In a further twist, the commission adds its own “narrowly defined” version of the US Volcker rule, which outlaws proprietary trading. The ban applies to around 30 big banks, regardless of whether their deposit-taking part is fenced off.
The proposals stem from the 2012 Liikanen report on the structure of banking. They are the finale to a welter of EU reform since the 2008 financial crisis, which has raised capital standards, introduced the first common rules to wind up failed lenders and launched a eurozone-based banking union.
    While deliberations on Liikanen are continuing within the commission, early drafts suggest Michel Barnier, the EU commissioner responsible, is opting for a middle way between international attempts to make bank structures safer and less complex to wind up.
    Mr Barnier’s proposal is expected to be published in late January or February – shortly before the European parliament breaks for elections. No agreement on the law is expected before December 2015, meaning it will become the responsibility of Mr Barnier’s successor.
    The blueprint has emerged from a difficult 15-month Brussels effort to draw up a law to implement the review led by Erkki Liikanen, a Finnish central banker, whose most contentious findings were resisted byFrance, Germany and a host of European banks.
    Like recent reforms pursued in France and Germany, it allows a bank’s supervisor to decide whether certain trading poses a “systemic risk” that should be separated. This judgment would be based on “metrics” designed by the European Banking Authority.
    Supervisors will be empowered to force activities such as including market-making and buying and selling derivatives to be placed in a separately capitalised entity. The potential inclusion of market-making is highly contentious and goes further than reforms planned by Paris and Berlin.
    But after such a split, the deposit-taking bank would still be allowed to sell standardised derivatives for hedging risk to insurance groups, non-financial companies and pension funds – within an exposure limit that Brussels would be empowered to set.
    The EU’s banking union plans seek to place eurozone banks under the overarching supervision of the ECB, followed by the creation of a bank resolution scheme for the bloc and, eventually, a common deposit scheme
    Supervisors would have the option to demand tougher standards. Alternative models for separation such as the UK Vickers reforms, which safeguard high-street banking and other “core” banking operations, would be permitted subject to Brussels approval.
    The Brussels timeline envisages the proprietary trading ban applying from 2018 and the separation of some banks from 2020. This means that the decision on separation for most affected banks will be taken by the European Central Bank, which this year becomes the eurozone’s top bank supervisor.
    The “Barnier rule” on proprietary trading prohibits activities for “the sole purpose of making a profit for own account without actual or anticipated client activity” – a narrow definition that goes beyond existing curbs planned in Europe.
    Mr Barnier sees the reforms as necessary but tailored to avoid damage to the financing of the real economy and capital markets. But the revisions to Liikanen will be controversial. Sven Giegold, a German Green MEP pressing for structural reforms, said the rules “risk having no real effect on the banking sector apart from adding bureaucracy”.
    “It looks like a purely symbolic political act,” he said.
    Potential exemptions will be a relief to industry. Thousands of EU small banks are exempt from any separation requirements or the prohibition on proprietary trading. EU sovereign debt trading remains untouched. Supervisors are also permitted to shield big mutuals, and co-operative and savings banks. These include Crédit Agricole and Group BPCE of France, and Germany’s DeKa and DZ Bank.
    The Liikanen report, by contrast, said its recommendations must “apply to all banks regardless of business model, including the mutual and co-operative banks, to respect the diversity of the European banking system.”

    (BFW) Liberty Global Said to Be Finalizing Ziggo Acquisition

    +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

    Liberty Global Said to Be Finalizing Ziggo Acquisition 2014-01-06 11:14:24.763 GMT

    By Sam Chambers Jan. 6 (Bloomberg) -- Two cos. are discussing final terms, aim to announce deal as early as the middle of this month, according to five people with knowledge of the matter. * Outstanding issues said to include whether Ziggo’s new CEO Rene Obermann will stay at the co. * NOTE: Ziggo confirmed it was in talks with Liberty on Dec 12

    For Related News and Information: First Word scrolling panel: FIRST<GO> First Word newswire: NH BFW<GO>

    To contact the reporter on this story: Sam Chambers in London at +44-20-7673-2021 or schambers7@bloomberg.net

    To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Ludden at +44-20-7673-2645 or jludden@bloomberg.net

    FT : Telefónica says no deal on Tim Brasil - that's the problem

    At first glance, there is an absurd ring to last week's request by Italian stockmarket regulator Consob that Telefónica comment on "indiscretions in the press" over whether it is buying Telecom Italia's Brazilian mobile unit Tim Brasil with a view to a three-way break-up.

    True, Telecom Italia's share price was all over the place last Friday and yes, the Spanish company will soon control the Italian operator. But it is not as if Consob is Telefónica's regulator.

    On top of sniffing around Tim Brasil, Consob's fishing expedition also sought to ascertain whether Telefónica has had dealings with Brazil's competition watchdog Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Económica (Cade) about a Tim Brasil deal.

    As it happens, Telefónica is already tangling with Cade over its request that it reduce its grip on Brazilian mobile telephony.

    Those charmingly-described "indiscretions" look to be based on talk that did the rounds three months ago, when Telecom Italia lost its CEO and research firms published compelling notes on the merits of Telefónica buying Tim Brasil and divvying it up between itself, América Móvil and Oi Telemar. The Spanish company would end up with the lion's share of the Brazilian mobile market.

    Telefónica today gamely came up with the line that although it "does not comment on speculative articles and news published by the press, [it] would like to clarify that it is not part to any such vehicle and it has no details of any kind on any such potential transaction to disclose to the public for market evaluation".

    Nor has it been chatting to Brazil's Cade about such a deal.

    Much as it would make sense for Telefónica to buy TIM Brasil and divvy it up – not least because Telecom Italia needs the cash to bring its precarious debt pile under control - it needs to be done without stiffing Telecom Italia minorities. That means that it should launch a consortium bid with its Brazilian partners - a solution that is as practical as it is transparent.

    That's if Telefónica has not just painted itself into a corner by responding to Consob's fishing expedition and saying it is not (at least not on its own) up to anything.

    FT : Peugeot charts route to recovery after surprise sale

    Peugeot charts route to recovery after surprise sale

    General Motors called up Goldman Sachs one dark afternoon in mid-December and asked it to sell its entire stake in PSA Peugeot Citroën, at the time worth about €270m and the second-largest after the Peugeot family.
    The surprise sale, which tanked the share price, came in a week that marked a rough end to the year for the French carmaker.

    In the same seven days Peugeot admitted its alliance with GM would save less money than expected and it was forced to write down €1.1bn on its foreign operations, Peugeot also finally announced what everyone knew: The proudly French company was in talks with state-owned Chinese carmaker Dongfeng for a financial lifeline.
    A tumultuous 2013 follows five years of troubles for Peugeot. It relies too much on the shrinking European car market, and its market share in that region has fallen from 19 per cent in 2007 to about 13 per cent. Brazilian and Russian operations have struggled. The group bleeds cash. Its price to book ratio is the worst in the entire global automotive industry.
    But the hope is that 2014 will mark a turning point. The deal on the table with Dongfeng is set to result in a cash injection of €3bn-€4bn – more than its €3.3bn market capitalisation – and involve the deep pockets of the French state.
    Industrial partnership
    Part of that deal would be an industrial partnership with Dongfeng to produce low-costs cars for the southeast Asian markets, helping Peugeot to reduce its reliance on Europe for two-thirds of its revenue, according to two people briefed on the talks.
    There will also be a new chief executive, Carlos Tavares, the former number two at Renault with years of experience dealing with international alliances, including Dongfeng.
    But the mountain to climb is steep. Peugeot has not produced positive free cash flow since 2010 and net debt is estimated to reach about €4.5bn by the end of 2013, with a cash burn for the year of €1.3bn, followed by about €700m this year.
    The company has done what it can to cut back spending, trimming investment into new models and research. But as rivals such as Volkswagen continue to pump money into future growth, Peugeot risks entering a downward spiral of a smaller product pipeline producing smaller returns.
    Cash position
    Peugeot executives declined to be interviewed by the Financial Times, but company officials repeatedly stress that the group has enough cash to keep on going in the short term.
    The house is not burning. But if it does not get some repairs soon, it could collapse
    - Person with knowledge of company’s internal thinking
    Its cash position with €9.8bn of cash and cash equivalents at the midpoint of this year is healthy, on paper, thanks in part to guarantees from the French state such as a €7bn safety net for its banking arm. But with another year of negative cash flow this year and rising debt, something has to give.

    Peugeot is the fifth most shorted stock in Europe, with 14 per cent of its shares out on loan, according to Markit, meaning that large wagers have been placed by hedge funds on the stock falling. The majority of GM’s stake was snapped up by hedge funds with short positions, according to two people with knowledge of the sale.
    Those sceptical that any Dongfeng deal would solve Peugeot’s woes point to three issues.
    First, in the short term, there is concern that – regardless of the discount or number of subscription rights – it will be so dilutive it will severely hurt the value of current shareholdings.
    “The deal may be good for the future of the company long term, but shareholders do not own the future of the company,” says Philip Watkins, director of automotive research at Citi. “It looks like it will be a really very significant dilution.”
    Governance
    Second, the thought of Peugeot being jointly governed by the French government, the Chinese state and the Peugeot family – itself internally divided – has the investment community fearing the worst.
    “The big thing to worry about is governance. It will be a three-headed monster,” says a senior investment banker in London.
    This is the one get out of jail card that they have
    - Senior investment banker in London
    The most fundamental critique is that while Dongfeng’s cheque keeps the wolf from the door for a while, and the extra sales in southeast Asia over the coming years would be welcome, it does not go to the core of the problems at Peugeot: its lossmaking European operations and lack of scale.
    For these challenges, Dongfeng has little to bring to the table in terms of volumes outside of China. In any case, alliances typically take the best part of a decade to mature and show tangible financial benefits.
    “This is the one get out of jail card that they have,” says the banker of Peugeot’s alliance with Dongfeng. “But [Dongfeng] will not do anything for the company industrially for at least five years. There’s no scale or expertise. It’s just money.”
    Production levels
    Peugeot produces just 3m cars a year, compared with 10m for Toyota, 9m for both GM and Volkswagen and 8m for Renault-Nissan, giving it less purchasing power than rivals. Even if Peugeot could capture 10 per cent of this 5.5m a year southeast Asian market – twice Renault-Nissan – that is still only half a million cars a year.
    Despite efforts to reduce its cost base, Peugeot still produces at higher costs than many of its competitors
    That lack of output has exacerbated the company’s high cost base and overcapacity in France. While the top five Volkswagen group plants in Europe have about a 90 per cent utilisation rate, the top five Peugeot ones have about a 77 per cent utilisation, according to Société Générale research. And that figure does not include other big PSA plants such as Rennes at 35 per cent and Villaverde at 20 per cent.
    The company has been bending over backwards to bring this cost base down over the past three years under chief executive Phillipe Varin, who announced 11,200 job cuts, froze wages and closed the first large factory in France for 30 years.
    But it still produces at higher costs than many of its competitors. Half of all 200,000 Peugeot employees are in France, compared with about 40 per cent of Renault’s 130,000 employees.
    Market share
    On top of this the company is losing market share in Europe. Its cars are well reviewed, but have found themselves in the squeezed middle between low-cost brands such as Kia and Dacia and premium players downsizing to meet emission norms.
    I hate the tentative Dongfeng deal because it will not improve the productivity of Peugeot in France and probably destroys employment
    - Philippe Villin, prominent French investment banker
    “This deal does not help with the core problems in Europe,” says Rabih Freiha, analyst at Exane BNP Paribas. “Over the next three years Peugeot are still going to have to restructure operations and cut capacity in Europe.”
    “I hate the tentative Dongfeng deal because it will not improve the productivity of Peugeot in France and probably destroys employment,” says Philippe Villin, a prominent French investment banker, reflecting the concern locally about Chinese involvement.
    “And ultimately it’s a crazy cost of capital because the company will be giving over its brands and technology to a Chinese player,” he says.
    But it is the cash injection that is making some optimistic that the Dongfeng deal will be a good one. The bulk of the French unions, for example, far from being fearful of Chinese ownership, are optimistic.
    “If Dongfeng wants to recapitalise Peugeot, that is basically great,” says Christian Lafaye of Force Ouvriere union. “Peugeot cannot live alone. Today we need more capital because we need cash to develop new cars and products.”
    New capital
    The new money raised from the capital increase will probably go to paying down debt as well as providing capital for the restructuring of the group, be it cutting capacity in Europe or developing emerging market operations.
    “Peugeot has no immediate problem funding the business, but there are product investment decisions that need to be made very soon for vehicles that will be launched around 2017,” says Stephen Reitman, analyst at Société Générale, adding that restructuring will also cost money.
    The Dongfeng deal is therefore still just the beginning of a long and dangerous road for Peugeot, a move to give breathing room for the group to address its European problems as well as to turn around fortunes in Brazil and Russia.
    For that it will be the new chief executive Mr Tavares, in a potentially crowded boardroom with the Chinese, the French government and the Peugeot family, who has to arrest the decline, hopefully helped by an improving European market.
    “It’s important that they continue to grow outside of Europe, but there is no getting away from the fact that they really have to tackle the domestic business,” says Mr Reitman. “That is a longer and more uncertain road.”